Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Potassium Trihydrate
Potassium Trihydrate
ABSTRACT
The aim of this experiment is to synthesize potassium tris(oxalato)chromium (III) via the
addition of oxalic acid and potassium dichromate, K2Cr2O7 to form a reagent. It will then being
added with potassium oxalate monohydrate, K2C2O4.H2O after a few minutes of cooling
process from previous reactions. A dark green precipitate will be formed after several process
and it will be dried in the oven and a total of 1.23g will be obtained. Later, the theoretical mass
and the percent yield will be calculated. Precipitate obtained will be kept in the vial to be used
in next experiment.
INTRODUCTION
Potassium tris(oxalato)chromium (III) is a metal complex of iron with three oxalate ligands
(C2O42-) bonded to every central metal atom. These ligands are bidentate, meaning that each
of them binds to the metal atom at two different places. It has the chemical formula
K3[Cr(C2O4)3]·3H2O, and the three-dimensional structure proposed in Figure 1. Potassium
tris(oxalato)ferrate (III) is hygroscopic and light sensitive in nature.
In this experiment,the desired product was produced in the form of dark green precipitate.
The oxalic acid utilized in the first step of this reaction scheme can be synthesized by
hydrolyzing cyanogen1 or by oxidizing sucrose or glucose with nitric acid in the presence of a
small amount of vanadium pentoxide.2 Another method of forming oxalic acid involves the
oxidative carbonylation of alcohols followed by hydrolysis.1
After successfully synthesizing the product, the percent yield is calculated using the mass of
precipitate obtained and theoretical yield using the formula below.
METHODOLOGY
The first part of this experiment involved synthesizing the desired product, potassium
tris(oxalato)chromium (III). This was done by mixing 5.00g of oxalic acid (H2C2O4·2H2O) in 10
mL of water with potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) in a 25 mL BOECO conical flask. A filter
funnel was placed on the flask. A blue-black or dark blue mixture was formed and it was
spontaneously warm up almost to boiling. Bubbles formation was observed during this
process. After about 15 minutes,the reaction was subsided and 2.10g of potassium oxalate
monohydrate, K2C2O4.H2O was dissolved in the mixture. It was then being heated up on a
FAVORIT hot plate at level 4 temperature. After 13 minutes,the mixture was boiled and it was
left to cool down to room temperature. Then, 10mL of 95% ethanol was added before the
mixture in the flask was cooled further in a bath of ice for about 15 to 30 minutes. A dark
green precipitate will be formed at the bottom of the conical flask.
The second part of this experiment involved suction filtration process of the mixture.
WHATMAN filter paper was used in this process. The remaining precipitate was collected an
put on a glass plate. It was then being allowed to dry in a MEMMERT oven at the temperature
of 73 Celcius degree for 20 minutes. After that,the solid was taken out from the oven and
being weighed on a balance. The theoretical yield and percentage yield was obtained and the
solid precipitate was kept in a vial to be used in next experiment.
RESULT AND OBSERVATION
= 0.0061 mol
Thus,
= 5.51g
= 1.23 x 100
5.51
= 22.32 %
4. WHAT IS THE OXIDATION STATE OF CHROMIUM IN K 2Cr2O7 AND IN THE PRODUCT?
Reduction:
14 H+ + Cr2O72- + 6C2O42- + 6e- → 2 Cr(C2O4)32- + 7H2O
Oxidation:
3C2O4 → 6CO2 + 6e-
Overall Equation:
K2Cr2O7 + 7 H2C2O4 + 2 K2C2O4 → 2 K3[Cr(C2O4)3] + 6 CO2 + 7 H2O
There are some errors happening throughout the experiment such as the systematic error of
the balance. It has a an error value of – 13.05 g. There are also some random errors done by
students when reading the measured value for any liquid,determining the colour of mixture
and solution and also while using the equipment. Althought this is an individual
experiment,the ice bath was shared by more than three students which somehow affecting
the stirring action for everyone. Time taken for cooling down process in the ice bath,waiting
for reaction to cool down to room temperature and also time taken for the precipitate to dry
are different for everyone. All of the above aspects are more or less affecting the end
results.
Some precautionary steps that could be taken to minimize errors are by reducing systematic
errors and random errors. Besides that, an abundant amount of equipment should also be
prepared to avoid oversharing between students.
CONCLUSION