You are on page 1of 156

i

DEVELOPING A SCHEME OF ACTION FOR ENHANCED ALTERNATIVE


LEARNING SYSTEM

A Dissertation
Presented to
The Graduate School of
CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
Main Campus, R. Palma Street
Cebu City, Philippines

In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
DOCTOR IN DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION

ALFONSO C. ABASOLO JR.

May 2017
ii

APPROVAL SHEET

This Dissertation entitled: “DEVELOPING A SCHEME OF ACTION FOR


ENHANCED ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM”, prepared and submitted by
ALFONSO C. ABASOLO JR. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in
DOCTOR IN DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION has been examined and is recommended
for acceptance and approval for Oral Examination.
DISSERTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

ROSEIN A. ANCHETA, JR., ASEAN ENGR., DM., Ph.D.


Chairperson

MARILYN M.MIRANDA, Ed. D. REBECCA DC MANALASTAS, Ed.D., Ph. D.


Adviser Member

ADORA A. VILLAGANAS, Ph. D. PERLA N. TENERIFE, Ed.D.,Ph. D.


Member Member

WILMA C. GIANGO, Ph. D. JANUARIO L. FLORES, JR. Ed.D., Ll.B.


Member Member

SEVERINO R. ROMANO, Ed.D


Member
______________________________________________________________________
APPROVED by the committee of Oral examination with the grade of _________

PANEL OF EXAMINERS

ROSEIN A. ANCHETA, JR., ASEAN ENGR., DM., Ph.D.


Chairperson

MARILYN M.MIRANDA, Ed. D. REBECCA DC MANALASTAS, Ed.D., Ph. D.


Adviser Member

ADORA A. VILLAGANAS, Ph. D. PERLA N. TENERIFE, Ed.D.,Ph. D.


Member Member

WILMA C. GIANGO, Ph. D. JANUARIO L. FLORES, JR. Ed.D., Ll.B.


Member Member

SEVERINO R. ROMANO, Ed.D


Member

Accepted and Approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
DOCTOR IN EDUCATION MAJOR IN DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION (Dev.Ed)

Comprehensive Examination: PASSED


Date of Oral Examination: April, 2017

REBECCA DC MANALASTAS, Ed. D., Ph. D.


Dean, Graduate School
iii

ABSTRACT

DEVELOPING A SCHEME OF ACTION FOR ENHANCED ALTERNATIVE


LEARNING SYSTEM

Alfonso C. Abasolo Jr
alfonsoaxel@yahoo.com
Cebu Technological University – Main Campus

The main thrust of the research Developing a Scheme of Action for


Enhanced Alternative Learning System was to measured and assessed the
Alternative Learning System in the Department of Education, Talisay City Division
for the improvement of the program implementation and to develop on its operation
in the field. The study utilized the descriptive research supplemented by
questionnaire and were given to 12 implementers and 186 learners in Alternative
Learning System. It was found out that the ALS Implementers used andragogy
method of teaching for the learners who were the Last, Least and Lost learners
which is the out of school youth and adult learners. In terms of academic profile,
only few of the Implementers finished their Master’s degree and all of them are
Bachelor’s Degree holder with an area of specialization in education. It was also
established that the Implementers possess the attributes of a good leader based
on the performance in handling ALS sessions and linkage to stakeholders. The
challenges, threats and opportunities met in the program implementation were also
explored as basis for the proposals of an improved development plan. The attitude
of being an ALS facilitator is contributed much, as guide on the learners’
performance and how they responded on the program. The Alternative Learning
System is a way for the non-formal education program and busy students to
achieve elementary and high school education without need of going to attend
classroom instructions on a daily basis just like the formal education system.
Furthermore, an enriched instructional program was prepared for the
implementation of the delivery system of the Alternative Learning System (ALS)
Accreditation and Equivalency (A&E) Program. This study provided a direction on
how ALS will be implemented in the community through the factors that effect on
its implementation.
Key Words : Alternative Learning System, Development Plan, Scheme of
action, enhance; Talisay City, Cebu.
iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The researcher wishes to extend his profound and sincerest gratitude to the

following persons for their valuable contributions in the research. The technical

group headed by the very able educator Dr. Rosein A. Ancheta, University

President; to Dr. Rebecca DC Manalastas, the Dean of Graduate School; to Dr.

Marilyn M. Miranda, his adviser for her guidance and professional advice to further

enhance his work; to Dr. Adora A. Villaganas, Dr.Perla N. Tenerife, Dr. Wilma C.

Giango, Dr. Junario L. Flores Jr and Dr. Severino R. Romano, for their valuable

suggestions and brilliant ideas to improve the research.

DepEd Talisay City Division, Talisay City, Cebu, our School Division

Superintendent Dr. Leah P. Noveras, for the never-ending support in ALS

Program, Augustus R. Larida, Glenn Tahanlangit, ALS Implementers (Junry, Ferdi,

Jovencio, Ingrid, Mera, Crista, and Dannah) and to all Education Program

Supervisors, for their unquestionable dedication in assisting all of his activities.

Mr.& Mrs.Alfonso C.Abasolo Sr.,the parents who always there for the love.

Ma. Ernestine A. Abasolo, the very understanding wife, who has shown

great concern and inspiration to finish this Doctorate Degree, together with the

three beautiful and cute kids: Juliene, Jules, Justine and above all, God Almighty

and Archbishop Teofilo Bastida Camomot, for the health and countless blessings.

ALFONSO CABELLON ABASOLO JR.


v

DEDICATION

This humble work is humbly dedicated:

To the love of my life

Ma. Ernestine Alcantara Abasolo

My Gems

Juliene Luissa, Jules Lorenz, Justine Louise

My Inspirations

Raf Raf, Roi Roi, Rhea, Regie & Ryka

My understanding Papa Pony and Mama Lesing

Sisters Siony and Weng Weng

and especially to

Almighty God for his protection and guidance.

ALFONSO CABELLON ABASOLO JR.


vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

TITLE PAGE………………………………………………………………….……..…..i
APPROVAL SHEET………………………………………………………….…..…....ii
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………...…..........iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT……………………………………………………..………..…iv
DEDICATION ……………………………………………………..………..………..…v
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………….……...vi
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………..………………….ix
LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………...……..…xi
Chapter 1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS RESEARCH DESIGN

INTRODUCTION
Rationale of the Study……………………………………………...…1
Theoretical Background…………………………………………….…8
THE PROBLEM
Statement of the Problem ………………………………………….19
Significance of the Study …………………………………....………20
Flow of the Study ……………………………………………..…...…24
THE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Environment …………………………...……...……………….....…25
Subjects/ Respondents ………………………….…………………29
Instruments …………………………………………………………..38
Procedure for Data Gathering………………...……………...…….38
Treatment of Data ……………………………………………...……39
Scoring Procedures…………………………………………….....…41
DEFINITION OF TERMS…………….………………………….…….….…42
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Related Studies………………………………….……………….….46
vii

Chapter 3
PRESENTATION, DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Profile of Respondents Groups…………………………….…..…..73
ALS Implementers …………………………………………….…73
Age and Gender……………………………………...….….73
Highest Educational Attainment……………...……….…...75
Year of Experience……………………...………….……….76
Appropriate Trainings and Seminars ………………….....78
ALS Learners……………………………...……………....……...79
Age and Gender ………………………………………….....79
Civil Status ………………………….………………..……...80
Highest Educational Attainment ……………………….….81
Combined Family Income………………...…………….…..83
Respondents’ Perception on the ALS Implementation………84
Instructional Materials…………………….......…………..85
Physical Facilities and Equipment……………….…..…..87
Financial Resources and Linkages…………….…...……88
Cooperation from stakeholders………………………..…91
Attitude of ALS Implementers……………………...……..92
Summary of Responses ………………………..………..……..94
Significant Coefficient of Correlation between ALS
Implementation and identified Variables……………....96
Perception of the ALS Implementers on the Best
Practices Related to ALS Implementation ……….…103

Chapter 4
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings……………………………………….….105
Conclusions……………………………………………………..109
Recommendations……………………………………....…….111
viii

Chapter 5
Output of the Study
Rationale…………………….……………………………….………….112
Objectives……………………………………………...………………..114
Scheme of Implementation…………………………………………….115
Development Plan…………………………………………………..…..116
BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………..…...…..119
APPENDICES
Transmittal Letter to the Superintendent……………………....………124
Transmittal Letter to the Adviser………………………………………..125
Teachers Profile………………………………………….....……..….....126
Learners Profile…………………………………………...…………..…129
Teachers Self-rating in Instructional Materials……………...………...131
Teachers Self-rating on Facilities and Equipment…………….…...…132
Teachers Self-rating on Financial Resources………………...……....133
Teachers Self-rating on Cooperation from stakeholders………….….133
Attitude of ALS Implementers……………………………………..…...134
Learners Self-rating on Instructional Materials…………………….…135
Learners Self-rating on Facilities and Equipment……………….……136
Learners Self-rating on Financial Resources………………….......…137
Learners Self-rating on Cooperation from stakeholders…………….137
Success story…………………………………………………….………138
CURRICULUM VITAE…………………………………………………………..….141
ix

LIST OF TABLES

Table Number Title Page

1 Distribution of the Respondents 30

2 Age and Gender of the Implementers 74

3 Highest Educational Attainment of the ALS Implementers 76

4 Years of Experience as ALS Implementor 77

5 Appropriate Trainings and Seminars 78

6 Age and Gender of Learners 79

7 Civil Status 80

8 Learners Highest Educational Attainment 81

9 Combined Family Monthly Income 83

10 Instructional Materials 85

11 Physical Facilities and Equipment 87

12 Financial Resources and Linkages 89

13 Cooperation from stakeholders 91

14 Attitude of ALS Implementers 92

15 Summary on Responses on ALS Implementation 95

16 Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers Age

and the ALS Implementation 96

17 Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers

Gender and the ALS Implementation 97

18 Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers

Educational Attainment and the ALS Implementation 97

19 Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers


x

Years of Experience and the ALS Implementation 98

20 Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers

Trainings and Seminars and the ALS Implementation 99

21 Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers

Income and the ALS Implementation 99

22 Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners Age

and the ALS Implementation 100

23 Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners

Gender and the ALS Implementation 101

24 Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners

Combined Family Income and the ALS Implementation 101

25 Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners

Educational Attainment and the ALS Implementation 102

26 Best practices related to ALS implementation in Talisay City

Division, Cebu 103


xi

LIST OF FIGURES

Table Title Page

1 Theoretical-Conceptual Framework of the Study 18

2 Flow of the Study 24

3 Schools Implementing ALS in Talisay City, Cebu 31-36

4 Research Environment Respondents 37

5 A Career Pathing for ALS Implementers and Learners 114


1

Chapter 1

THE PROBLEM AND RESEARCH DESIGN

INTRODUCTION

Rationale of the Study

Countries like South Africa, United States of America, Uganda and other

Countries needs a broad consolidated youth and adult education policy for the

many people who a have not benefited from the formal system of education and

training. Although this policy may understandably priorities literacy and basic

education and take in the attention to out-of-school youth and marginalized

children and to language issues and support for the creation of literate

environments (http://www.educationinnovations.org). In the Philippines and some

other countries, the children who face the most severe barriers to education, such

as those associated with gender, poverty, displacement, nomadism, disability,

and/or ethnicity, are still left behind. Many of these children do not get a chance to

go to school because their families bank on them for labor, the distance and the

risk in going to school. Some cannot attend because the local schools lack water

points, latrines, or accessible facilities for children with disabilities. The greatest

challenges are met by children who encounter several of these barriers.

The Mobile school is a cart with extendable blackboards and it can be set

up and torn down, a fully weather resistant and can be used on sidewalks, parks

and slums of big city. The mobile school is fully weather resistant that is suitable

in a burning Caribbean sun and freezing temperature in Romania. The Kariton

Klasrum in the Philippines provides street children, out-of-school children, and


2

school dropouts aged five to 14 years old with easier access to education. After

six months, learners are assessed for school-readiness, before eventually being

reintegrated into regular schools or the Alternative Learning System (ALS).

The government of Micronesia is also contracted the National Training

Council (NTC) to work on the development of out-of-school youths’ skills and

potential through various training opportunities that will help them to find jobs and

thus secure better conditions for their future lives. The programme’s target groups

were out-of-school youths aged between 17 and 23 whose mother tongue was

Marshallese. In terms of their initial level of education, most were 9th to 11th grade

drop-outs. As most of the learners wanted to participate in a Job Corp training

programme in Hawaii. In Mumbai, India, if their children cannot go to school, then

the school should go to them. Around 3,000 children benefit from the project every

year. Everyday a school bus pulls up at 4 locations outside the slums and

Volunteer teachers hold non-formal education classes and encourage parents to

send their children to the school bus for a couple of hours per day (plan-

international.org).

In the Philippines the program intended for our out-of–school youth and

adult is called Alternative Learning System (ALS). Since every Filipino has a right

to free basic education, the Government creates ALS to deliver all Filipinos the

chance to have right of entry and complete basic education in a mode that fits their

present situations and needs.

The Alternative Learning System is a parallel learning system to provide a

viable alternative to the existing formal education instruction, encompassing both


3

the non-formal and informal sources of knowledge and skills, the Department of

Education, through the Bureau of Non formal education is mandated to ensure that

all learning needs of the marginalized learners are addressed; one of the most

important initiatives in Non-Formal Education in the Philippines in the last 10 years

in the Alternative Learning System (ALS), which is a major component of basic

education with a clearly defined role within the overall educational goals; The ALS

will respond to the need of a more systematic and flexible approach in reaching to

all types of learners outside the school system (DepEd R.A. 9155).

Pursuant to Section 14 of Republic Act No. 9155, otherwise known as

“Governance of Basic education act of 2001,” hereinafter referred to as the “act,”

the following Rules and Regulation are hereby promulgated: the Department of

Education shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all.

(Rule I Section 1.1)

The Department of Education (DepEd) shall establish, maintain and support

a complete adequate and integrated system of basic education relevant to the

needs of the teachers and society. It shall establish and maintain a system of free

and compulsory public education in the Elementary and Secondary level.

All educational institutional shall indicate patriotism and nationalism, foster

love of humanity, respect for human rights, appreciation of the role of national

heroes in the historical development of the country, teach the rights and duties of

citizenship, strengthen ethical and spiritual values, develop moral character and

personal disciplines, encourage critical and creative thinking, broaden scientific

and technological knowledge, and promote vocational efficiency.


4

Non formal Education is defined as any organized, “systematic educational

activity carried outside the framework of the formal system to provide selected

types of learning to a segment of the population”( DepEd, Republic Act 9155). It is

“a lifelong process of learning by which every person acquire and accumulates

knowledge, skills, attitudes and insights from daily experiences at home, at work,

at play and from life itself”.

Bureau of Alternative Learning System (BALS) before is currently handled

by the (BLD-SID) Bureau of Learning Delivery-Student Inclusion Division that

carries out two Non formal Education Programs. These are the Basic Literacy

Program (BLP) for non-illiterate learners and the Accreditation and Equivalency

(A&E) Test for elementary and high school drop-outs/ overaged learners. BALS is

currently setting up the Informal Education Curriculum that will include self-interest

and life experience program. Initially, it has already developed a special curriculum

for Indigenous Peoples (IPs), Madrasah, SPED/ Special Education Program. With

their construct, greater learning needs will be addressed and funneled to promote

lifelong learning in all streams of education.

Perhaps literacy is not a remedy for solving all the problems facing in every

countries and communities implementing the Non-Formal Education or Alternative

Learning System, there is no doubt that a literate population is more productive

and empowered to make informed decisions to enjoy sustainable livelihoods than

an illiterate population. It should be pointed out that non-formal education should

not be assumed to be for non-literates only because it does accommodate literate


5

people and contribute towards improving their livelihood and alleviate the status of

each individual in terms of living condition.

The researcher develop a scheme of action for enhance Alternative

Learning System of Division of Talisay City for the purpose of more and better

implementation on the program set by the government to the learners and to

enhance “the right of every citizen to quality basic education and shall take

appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all” (Section 1.1 R.A

9155).

For how many years Alternative Learning System implemented in the

Philippines many out of school youth and adult were benefited the program, most

of them entered in the field of work and some continued their studies. Manny

“PACMAN” Pacquiao , World Boxing Champ and a Senator in the Republic of the

Philippines, as anticipated, people milled around him during the registration. He

took the test as any usual test taker did, and finished it in four hours and a half.

Manny Pacquiao was one of the 11,736 test takers in the whole of Mindanao. A

Business Management student of Notre Dame University in Dadiangas, General

Santos City. An ALS A&E passer and a proud Ambassador of the Alternative

Learning System (ALS).

As an implementer and ALS advocates it is our Vision and Mission to

empower the learners through more responsive quality Alternative Learning

System Program and the empowerment of the Filipino with desirable knowledge,

skills, attitudes and values that will act innovatively and humanely in improving the

quality of his life, community and country. And to fulfill this, it is our aim to help
6

those far from school, marginalized, underserved people to become literate and

functional in their own field, So that they can get a better job or uplift their lives into

the real world.

According to Republic Act 9155 that education is accessible to all where

there is free and compulsory elementary education with high school level. The

state shall encourage local initiatives for improvement, ensure the values, needs

and aspirations of school community. The statement under Item No. 7 of DepEd

Order No. 64, s. 2011 (Equal Opportunities and Standard Implementation of

DepEd Policies for the Alternative Learning System (ALS) Implementors) has

additional legal basis. Mobile Teacher and District ALS Coordinators who follows

flexible teaching schedule without summer vacation to meet the learning needs of

the Learners, they are entitled to earn leave credits and avail of the privilege of

monetization of leave credits. Availment of such privilege must be pursuant to the

guidelines prescribed under MEC Memorandum No. 12, s. 1982 entitled

“Accumulation and Crediting of Leaves”. DECS Order: (No. 51, s. 1997) under this

Circular, government officials and employees shall now be allowed to monetize a

maximum of thirty (30) day vacation leave/service credits, subject to the following

conditions. As a Teacher in DepEd, the Mobile Teacher/DALSC is entitled for

promotion to the next higher level as a Master Teacher, as a School Head or as a

Supervisor at the District, Division and Regional levels based on the Civil Service

Commission based on the qualification standards as what is stated in the Equal

Opportunities and Standard Implementation of DepEd Policies for the Alternative

Learning System (ALS) Implementors DepEd Order: (No.: 64, s. 2011), As a


7

Teacher, the Mobile Teacher/DALSC shall receive the same benefits and

professional development packages awarded to regular teachers in terms of

fellowships, scholarships and training opportunities in all learning areas of the

basic education curriculum. Andragogy by (Knowles, 2000) to label the academic

discipline that reflects and researches the education and learning of adults. This is

give emphasis to the differentiation between the field of practice and the scholarly

approach. In our understanding “andragogy” comprises the “life wide learning” of

adults. This understanding includes not only institutionalized forms of learning, but

also self-directed and even partly-intentional or non-intentional forms of learning.

Contingency Theory by (Fiedler, 2004) is sometimes known as a “situational” view,

a contingency theory describes some aspect of leadership that applies to some

Contingency model of leadership, and this theory may explain how leader behavior

typically varies from one situation to another. The approach of Purposive

Behaviorism have been utilized to understand adolescent risk taking as a

purposive behavior enacted with a specific goal in mind. Adolescent risk taking is

the result of arrogance or perceived invulnerability and interpreted as a means to

an end. The Implementation of the ALS program in the City of Talisay with the

guide of these Theories and Memoranda through systematic planning become

successful and can reduce the non-literates, out of school youth and adult in the

community.
8

Theoretical Background

This study is primarily anchored on the Contingency Theory of Fielder

(2004). Fiedler came up with this approach to leadership after realizing that leaders

could function well if they changed their styles to suit the situation at hand. This is

where the name contingency originates. Fielder conducted several studies of

effective and ineffective leaders. Thereafter, Fielder (2004) concluded that the

most successful approach would be to match organizational settings with

leadership styles. These two parameters form the basis of the contingency theory

of leadership.

According to Fiedler (2004), leadership style is the way leaders and

employees interact with one another. One cannot claim that a manager's

leadership style changes from time to time. On the contrary, this is a fixed

parameter since every leader has a different personality. The latter term largely

affects the nature of the leadership style. Since this trait is important, Fielder came

up with a method for categorizing leadership styles. He used the Least Preferred

Coworker Scale (LPC). The Scale is applied only to leaders; the latter are asked

to rate the person they feel has worked very poorly with them. The scale starts

from one to eight and may be a classification of a co-worker from the past or the

present depending on which worker was the worst. Examples of personality traits

that guide the scaling process include; Unfriendly versus friendly workers; hostile

versus supportive; guarded versus open; and uncooperative versus cooperative

(Fiedler, 2004).
9

All the latter traits are in ascending order with number 1 representing the

character trait on the left while number 8 represents the character trait on the right.

The LPC scale's main purpose is to determine whether a particular form of

leadership style is task oriented or people oriented. Leaders who score high marks

in the scale favor interpersonal relationships. Consequently, those leaders who

rate their co-workers in a negative light may be more interested in the task at hand.

This also implies that such leaders have poor interpersonal relationships.

However, critics have asserted that such traits may not necessarily be accurate.

Some individuals may portray their co-workers in a negative light but still be keen

on interpersonal relationships.

Fielder (2004) felt that those leaders who managed to match the

requirements of the task with a dominant personality trait tended to be more

successful. Dominant personality traits largely determine the approach chosen by

leaders i.e. either people oriented or task oriented approach. The LPC scale

indicates whether or not a certain individual values interpersonal relationships. In

case leaders score highly, then they normally consider interpersonal relationships

as a crucial part of implementing tasks. However, those who score low marks in

the scale value task completion more than anything else does. Consequently, most

of them may not bother creating close relationships with their employees.

Fielder (2004) was also concerned with the organizational environment or

what is also called the situational variable. According to him, the situational

variable can be defined as that aspect within the organization that can allow

leaders to exert influence within their team.


10

The leader-member structure is defined as the level of acceptance team

players have towards their leader. Task structures may be defined as the level of

job specificity among subordinates. Lastly, position power is described as the level

of authority attributed to a leader as result of his position within the organization

(Fiedler, 2004).

In the Leader-member situation, a leader would be more successful if he

establishes strong links between himself and the other people within the

organization; this is through trusting and respecting members of his organization.

Additionally, successful leaders in the task structure situation are those ones that

specify job detail well. Powerful leaders in the position power situation are those

ones that exercise their right to fire and hire or to reward individuals within the

organization.

All the latter three situations create eight leadership styles. These are then

divided into two important groups known as the relationship and task oriented

leaders. Five of the leadership styles fall under the latter category.

Fielder (2004) felt that task oriented approach were more appropriate in

disasters or extreme situations. In cases where a fire strikes an organization, then

leaders would be more efficient if they applied the task oriented approach. At this

time, the issue of position power is not very relevant and neither are the

relationships of the co-workers. In extreme cases or in disasters, the individuals

who direct tasks most efficiently become the leaders. The opposite is true for

leaders who try applying a people oriented approach. This would mean considering
11

what people think and this would eventually delay outcomes. Such cases require

only the fastest responses for survival.

Task oriented relationships are also important in blue collar jobs. This is

because such workers normally require direction and job specificity. Therefore, this

leadership approach would be most appropriate. On the other hand, such

scenarios may still be characterized by strong leader member relationships. The

latter situation can be effected when leaders reward worker well for their efforts.

Relationship oriented leadership styles may be more favorable in situations

where the organizational environment is highly predictable. Some of the most

appropriate environments include research institutes. In such circumstances,

subordinates would not like it if their leaders interfered with the nature of their task.

Here, it would be more appropriate to work on building relationships with

subordinates.

It should be noted that Fielder's theory does not cover all the possible

factors affecting leadership. Some leaders may be more effective if they undergo

training or gain experience on the job. Such factors have not been accounted for

by the contingency theory.

This study is also anchored on the Burrhus Frederick Skinner (2010), the

“Behavioral Psychologist,” noted of his operant respondent. Operant learning

results from an organism’s operating on its environment. Whatever it does that

proves instrumental in obtaining its objective is reinforced by the obtaining of the

objective. A pigeon, for example, is placed in the box when, during its endeavor to

find food, it happens to depress a lever, a pallet of food into the dish. Gradually the
12

animal learns to get food by pressing down the lever and instrumental conditioning

has been established.

Skinner believes that education should maximize knowledge. This is done

through operant conditioning through building up a student’s repertoire of

response. Skinner insists that when students can answer questions in a given

area, and speaks and write fluently about the area, then by definition, they

understand the area. A verbal repertoire is not a sign language – it is knowledge

Good teaching, therefore, is the ability to arrange the proper sequence of

reinforcement to make sure that these reinforcements are contingent upon

students emitting the appropriate responses.

Skinner also suggest that teachers should use techniques that produce

meaningful behavioral changes. Though teachers may sometimes use primary

reinforces such as candy, condition reinforces such as good grades, promotion

and prizes. He favored the use of teaching materials, programmed instruction, and

behavior therapy, for it can provide immediate reinforcement and help bridge the

gap between the students behavior and the more instant conditioned reinforces

such as promotion or grades. Skinner is against the use of punishment in the

schoolroom, not because it will not control behavior but it may produce a host of

negative emotional reaction. According to Skinner, teachers cannot always wait

for behavior to manifest itself; therefore they must sometimes shape the behavior

of the individual. By means of innovations such as videotape replay, for example,

students see themselves in action and discover their deficiencies. Such devices

prove beneficial in reinforcing learning in large classes, in which the teacher is


13

unable to cope with all individual problems that raise. To generalize the laws of

classical conditioning to the whole range of human behavior is to carelessly

overwork a fairly restricted formula. A Skinner pointed out, a human being is a far

more than a mere jack – in – a – box with a list of tricks to be elicited by pressing

the correct bottom. The bulk of an individual’s response takes another form.

For E.C. Tolman’s creator of “Purposive Behaviorism” a bridge between

rigid behaviorism and doctrinaire gestalts’, offered a cognitivist of learning. The

mental processes at work in the learning experience are more than mere stimulus

– response connectism. The fundamental law of learning is the acquisition of “sign

– gestalts,” that is, of cognitive representations intervening between stimulus and

response. It was called purposive behaviorism because Tolman insisted that far

from being random and chaotic, learning is goal directed. The learning organism

is a striving to give meaning to behavior. Yet Tolman’s theory was also

behavioristics because he believed that scientific validity could be achieved only

by observing objective behavior (Tulio, 2010). For Abraham Maslow and Carl

Rogers emphasize the individual’s self-concept and striving for growth,

development and self-actualization.

By Burrhus Frederick Skinner, in his operant conditioning, through building

up a student repertoire of responses. He suggest that the teachers may sometimes

use primary reinforces such as condition reinforces promotion, good grade and

others. He favored the use of teaching materials, programmed instruction, and

behavioral therapy, for it can provide immediate reinforcement and help bridge the
14

gap between the students behavior and the more instant conditioned reinforces

such as promotion or grades.

This work has been of great interest to the educational psychologist, who

have long recognized that emphasis on the individual tended to result in neglect of

the socio-psychologist factors as found in classrooms and other school groups,

such as student councils, homerooms and other school activities, by Kurt Lewin in

his nature of small groups.

By the two psychologist Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers emphasize the

individual’s self-concept and striving for growth, development and self-

actualization. For E.C. Tolman insisted that far being random and chaotic, learning

is goal directed. The learning organism is striving organism, striving to give

meaning to behavior.

This study is also anchored on Andragogy theory of teaching Adults by

Malcolm Knowles, Experiential Learning Theory by Carl Rogers and Humanistic

Theory by Abraham Maslow .

Andragogy is a concept popularized by Malcolm Knowles. Knowles’ theory

of andragogy was an attempt to create a theory to differentiate learning in

childhood from learning in adulthood. The term itself was not new. European adult

educators had been using it consistently to refer to both the practical aspects of

adult teaching and learning and to the academic study of adult education.

Knowles contrasted andragogy as “the art and science of helping adults

learn” with pedagogy, the art and science of helping children learn. The second

edition of his book, however, marked a rethinking in Knowles original conception


15

of andragogy as characterizing only adult learners—as indicated in the change in

subtitles from Andragogy Versus Pedagogy to From Pedagogy to Andragogy. His

most recent conclusion was that the use of andragogical and pedagogical

principles is to be determined by the situation and not by the age of the learner.

Andragogy is essentially a “model of assumptions” (Knowles, 2000) about

the characteristics of adult learners that are different from the traditional

pedagogical assumptions about child learners rather than an actual theory of adult

learning. Based on humanistic psychology, Knowles’ concept of andragogy

presents the individual learner as one who is autonomous, free, and growth-

oriented. The two dimensions of andragogy as elaborated by Knowles are its

assumptions about the characteristics of adult learners and the process elements

of adult education that stem from these characteristics. He initially related four

basic assumptions and added a fifth and sixth in later publications. Self-

concept: As people mature, they move being a dependent personality toward

being more self-directed; Experience: As people mature, they amass a growing

set of experiences that provide a fertile resource for learning; Readiness to learn:

As people mature, they are more interested in learning subjects that have

immediate relevance to their jobs or personal lives; Orientation to learning: As

people mature, their time perspective changes from gathering knowledge for future

use to immediate application of knowledge. As such, adult learners become more

problem-centered rather than subject-centered (Knowles, 2000) Motivation to

learn: As people mature, they become more motivated by various internal

incentives, such as need for self-esteem, curiosity, desire to achieve, and


16

satisfaction of accomplishment; and Relevance: As people mature, they need to

know why they need to learn something (Knowles, 2004). Furthermore, because

adults manage other aspects of their lives, they are capable of directing or, at least,

assisting in the planning and implementation of their own learning.

Self-direction. About the same time that Knowles introduced andragogy,

self-directed learning appeared as another model to help distinguish adult learners

from children. Not only did Knowles indicate that self-directed learning is one of

the key assumptions of adult learning, but he also contributed to the literature with

his book entitled Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and

Teachers (2005). His book explains the concept and outlines how to implement it

through learning contracts. According to Knowles (2005), in its broadest sense,

self-directed learning describes a process “... in which individuals take the initiative,

with or without the help of others, in diagnosing their learning needs, formulating

learning goals, identifying human and material resources for learning, choosing

and implementing appropriate learning strategies, and evaluating learning

outcomes. Being self-directed signifies that adult students can and should be

allowed to participate in evaluating their learning needs, planning and

implementing the learning activities, and evaluating those experiences. Knowles

further stated that individuals can be assisted in becoming more self-directed when

given appropriate learning tools, resources, experiences, and

encouragement. For example, educators might provide assistance to individuals

or groups of learners in locating resources or mastering alternative learning


17

strategies. The learners would then seek out this assistance through technology

or learning centers.

The Alternative Learning System is a parallel learning system to provide

viable to the existing formal education instruction, encompassing both the non-

formal and informal source of knowledge and skills.

Section 14 of Republic Act No. 9155, otherwise known as “Governance of

Basic Education Act of 2001, state that the Department of Education shall protect

and promote the right of all citizens to quality basic education and shall take

appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all. And shall maintain and

support a complete adequate, and integrated system of basic education relevant

to the needs of the people and society. It shall established and maintain a system

of free and compulsory public education in the elementary level and free education

in the high school level. The aforementioned theories served as bases in the

development of the research problem and interpretation of the data.


18

Andragogy
Republic Act 9155 by (Knowles, 2000)

Contingency
DECS Order: (No. 51, Theory
MEC s. 1997) by (Fiedler, 2004)
Memorandum: (No.
12, s. 1982) Purposive Operant
DepEd Order: (No.: 64, Behaviorism Conditioning
s. 2011) (Tolman, 2008) by (Skinner, 2010)

The Implementation of the Alternative


Learning System in the Division of Talisay
City

Persons Involved Activities Strategies


Schools Division Superintendent
Advocacy and Social Identify potential learners
Assistant Schools Division
Mobilization Information dissemination on ALS
Superintendent
Orientation programs and projects .
Chief Supervisor
Enroll Learners Strengthen partnership with
Public School District Supervisor
Conduct ALS Sessions community leaders.
Education Program Specialist-ALS
ALS A&E Registration Develop teachers’ competence in
ALS Implementers, LGUs,NGOs
ALS Graduation ALS Implementation through
ALS Learners
seminars and workshop

Development Plan

Monitor ALS sessions regularly


Conduct Mock test for learners
Increase number of ALS A&E test Passers
ALS INSET/ Team building for Implementers

Figure 1.

Theoretical-Conceptual Framework of the Study


19

THE PROBLEM

Statement of the Problem

This research assessed the level of implementation of the Alternative

Learning System (ALS) program, among the implementers and learners in the

Division of Talisay City, Cebu, during the calendar year 2016 as basis for an

enhanced development plan.

Specifically, this study sought to answer the following questions:

1. What was the profile of the respondents groups as to:

1.1 ALS Implementers’

1.1.1 age and gender

1.1.2 highest educational attainment;

1.1.3 years of experience as ALS Implementor; and

1.1.4 appropriate trainings and seminars?

1.2 ALS learners’

1.2.1 age and gender

1.2.2 civil status

1.2.3 highest educational attainment

1.2.4 combined family monthly income

2. As perceived by the respondents groups, what is the level of ALS

implementation as perceived by the respondents groups in terms of factors:

2.1 instructional materials,

2.2 physical facilities and equipment,

2.3 financial resources and linkages,


20

2.4 cooperation from stakeholders; and

2.5 attitude of ALS Implementers?

3. Is there a significant relationship between the levels of ALS implementation of

the ALS Implementers and their:

3.1 age and gender,

3.2 highest educational attainment,

3.3 years of experience as ALS Implementor,

3.4 appropriate trainings and seminars, and

3.5 learners combined family monthly income?

4. What are the best practices related to ALS implementation?

5. Based on findings what enhanced Development plan can be designed?

Null Hypothesis

This study postulates the given hypothesis:

Ho 1: There is no significant relationship between the respondents groups’

perception to the level of implementation of the ALS program.

Ho 2: There is significant relationship between the respondents groups’

perception to the ALS teachers’ profile and the level of implementation of the ALS

program.

Significance of the Study

This study is conducted in DepEd to determine the implementation of

Alternative Learning System of Division of Talisay City, Cebu for school year 2016-

2017, as bases for proposing a scheme of actions to promote, improve, monitor

and evaluate the Alternative Learning intervention for functional literacy of out-of-

school youth and adults, for ethnic minorities and other groups with special
21

educational needs that cannot be met by schools, and for desired competencies

that are part of lifelong learning,” ALS (EFA). It is expected that the findings of this

study will be useful for any training, programs, scheme of actions for the purpose

of the implementation of the Alternative Learning System.The importance and

value of this study can be benefited by the following persons;

Department of Education (DepEd). This study will benefit the department

because the results will be the basis for improvement of the implement of all non-

formal and adult learning programs of the government.

DepEd Talisay City Division. The office and the ALS Implementers can

benefit of this study to determine the strength and weaknesses of the ALS Program

Implementation in the division.

School Heads and Operating Officers. This study will be useful for

anything programs that involve community participation, to increase the rate of

participation of the youth who enrolled in ALS classes.

Education Program Specialist in Alternative Learning System. They

can assessed and improved the needs of the ALS program in their respective

offices.

District Alternative Learning System Coordinators. They will be able to

reassess the success and areas for improvement of the program through

quantitative and qualitative data generated from this study.

Alternative Learning System Mobile Teachers. They will learn new

knowledge and information from this study because this covers the implementation

level of ALS and the common problems they encountered.


22

Barangay Officials will also benefited from this study because they can

help the adult learners in their community.

Parents. Through the findings, they will be encouraged and help their

growing to continue their study through the ALS.

Alternative Learning System Learners. They are the adult learners who,

through the findings can be guided on how to seek the basic literacy skills

functional life skills and support services for the improvement of the quality of their

life.

Other Out-of-school youth. Through the findings of the study can became

educational opportunities of the formal school system who have dropped out from

the formal elementary and secondary education.

The Researcher. The output of the study will help the researcher and the

school to intensify the integration of study through the ALS.

Future Researchers. The findings of this study will serve as reference and

guide in developing future studies related to ALS.


23

Flow of the Study

This presents the inputs of the study which are required for the process that

will provide the necessary results or outputs. The inputs included the profile of ALS

teachers’ respondents as to their age and gender, highest educational attainment,

years of experience as ALS implementor and appropriate trainings and seminar;

and the profile of learners’ respondents as to their age and gender, civil status,

highest educational attainment, combined family monthly income.

Processes of the study are the act of surveying through the use of

questionnaires.

Evaluating ALS teachers and learners profile pertaining to the

implementation of ALS program. Also included the checking, presenting the data,

statistical treatment, analysis and interpretation of data. Then conclusions and

recommendations made.

The outputs are proposals to enhance the implementation of the Alternative

Learning System in the Division of Talisay City, Cebu.


24

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

1.The profile of the respondents


1.1 ALS Implementers Analysis of Inputs
1.1.1 age and gender;
through the use of:
1.1.2 highest educational attainment;
1.1.3 years of experience as ALS
Implementor; and Survey using the
1.1.4 appropriate trainings and Questionnaire
seminars?
1.2 Learners
1.2.1 age and gender Data Gathering
1.2.2 civil status Proposed
1.2.3 highest educational attainment
1.2.4 combined family monthly income Statistical Analysis
2. ALS implementation perceived by the
Development
respondents groups as to the Interpretation of
following factors: Data
2.1 instructional materials Plan
2.2 physical facilities and equipment
2.3 financial resources and linkages Findings
2.4 cooperation from stakeholders; For an Improved
and
2.5 attitude of ALS Implementers Conclusions
Implementation
3. Significant relationship between the Recommendations
levels of ALS implementation of the
ALS Implementers and their: of ALS
3.1 age and gender
3.2 highest educational attainment
3.3 years of experience as ALS
Implementor
3.4 appropriate trainings and
seminars; and
3.5 learners combined family
monthly income

4. Best Practices in ALS Implementation

Figure 2

Flow of the Study


25

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Environment

This study is conducted in Talisay City. Talisay was formerly an

estate/vesita of the Augustinian account. It was named after a tree species that

grows abundantly in the place called “Magtalisay”. The other account was that it

was named after a town in Spain. The town was founded in 1849 with Silverio

Fernandez as the first gobernadorcillo and Pedro Labuca as capitan. During the

Spanish, Japanese and American struggles, Talisay used to be the center of

guerilla operations. The American forces landed and liberating the entire province

of Cebu in the shores of Cansojong and Poblacion last August 28, 1945. Talisay

is the home of brave generals who fought furiously for the most cherished freedom

from the foreign colonizers who wished to invade and enslave the Talisaynons and

these were the Tres Aliños and the modern day generals of our times. Talisay is

rich in heritage and colorful culture that truly showcase the real essence of a

Talisaynon that is value-laden and an empowered citizenry. The center of

commerce in Talisay takes place in the Tabunok area, where several public

markets, malls and commercial establishments are situated. The biggest mall is

Gaisano Grand Fiesta Mall Tabunok, which has a supermarket, department store

and cinema. However, much of the population still depend on the public markets,

where they can find fresh meat, fish and vegetables, as well as other household

needs. Talisay City and the Tabunok area also serve as the commercial area for

municipalities south of the city, being the southern gateway to Cebu City.Talisay

City, its citizens and its surrounding barangays have benefitted from the
26

construction of the South Road Properties project, which is a 6-lane coastal

highway from downtown Cebu City to the town of Minglanilla, with several exits in

between, many of which serve several areas of Talisay. The highway, traffic, which

has always been a problem for the inhabitants in the past few years for this area,

has been greatly reduced, making the city a popular zone for housing once more,

as it was in the early 70s and 80s. By virtue of Republic Act 8979, Talisay became

one of the component cities in the province of Cebu on January 12, 2001.The

inception of the cityhood also gives birth to the Division of Talisay City on January

10, 2003. Talisay City then became a separate division from DepEd Cebu

Province. Department of Education (DepEd)Talisay City Division has 18

elementary schools and 25 secondary schools:

ALS Implementing Schools

Maghaway Elementary School is located in the mountain area in the

barangay. Barangay Maghaway has a land area of 244 hectares with six (6) sitios.

The barangay belongs to the 5th income class of the City of Talisay.

Lagtang Elementary School teaches students in grades first through sixth

in Talisay City, Cebu of Central Visayas (Region VII). The school has 33

instructional rooms and 1 non-instructional rooms, which are all powered by a

power grid. With 1,920 students, class size is around 58 students (2014-2015).

Lagtang is one of the 22 barangays of Talisay City in the province of Cebu,

Philippines. It has Tabunoc to the east, Jaclupan to the west, Lawaan II to the

south, and Bulacao to the north.


27

Bulacao Elementary School teaches students in grades first through sixth

in Talisay City, Cebu of Central Visayas (Region VII). The school has 22

instructional rooms and 2 non-instructional rooms, which are all powered by a

power grid. With 1,258 students, class size is around 57 students. Bulacao is a

barangay of Talisay City. Bulacao got its name from the word "bucaco", the

Visayan name for the highgrade variety of sorghum, "dawa" or "kabog". Most of

these bucaco trees were raised by the original settlers of this barangay. It was the

natives who adopted this name that when this place was transformed into a barrio,

the name Bulacao was used. This happened in the early 19th Century. In 2002,

Bulacao hand an estimated population on 9,125.

Tanke Elementary School has 11 instructional rooms and 1 non-

instructional rooms, which are all powered by a power grid. With 1,214 students,

class size is around 110 students.

Iba Elementary School is located in the mountain barangay of Jaclupan,

teaches students in grades first through sixth in Talisay City, Cebu of Central

Visayas (Region VII). The school has 4 instructional rooms and 0 non-instructional

rooms, which are all powered by a power grid. With 134 students, class size is

around 34 students.

Talisay City Central Elementary School belong to District of Talisay I,

teaches students in grades first through sixth in Talisay City, Cebu of Central

Visayas (Region VII). The school has 71 instructional rooms and 5 non-

instructional rooms, which are all powered by a power grid. With 4,533 students,
28

class size is around 64 students. Mostly of the sudent are coming from nearby

barangays which is Barangay Dumlog, Mohon and Cansojong.

Talisay City National High School located inside Talisay City Central

Elementary School, teaches students in grades seventh through twelveth in

Talisay City, Cebu. They offered ABM (Accountancy, Business and Management),

GAS (General Academic Strand), HUMSS (Humanities and Social Sciences),

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), TVL- ICT( Computer

Hardware Servicing), TVL-IA ( Electrical Installation and Maintenance). The school

has 32 instructional rooms and 0 non-instructional rooms, which are all powered

by a power grid. With 2,330 students, class size is around 73 students.(SY 2013-

2015).

Tabunoc Central Elementary School with the total population of 17,593

in the barangay(2010), most of the primary age student went to these school and

offers kindergarten to sixth grade ,Madrasah Education for the Muslim and Special

Education.

Tabunoc Night High School shared rooms from Tabunoc Central

Elementary School, teaches students in grades seventh through twelveth in

Talisay City, Cebu of Central Visayas (Region VII). The school offered ABM

(Accountancy, Business and Management), GAS (General Academic Strand ),

TVL-IA ( Electrical Installation and Maintenance).

San Roque National High School located inside Laray Elementary

School, also known as Laray National High School - Jaclupan National High
29

School Extension, teaches students in grades seventh through twelveth in Talisay

City, Cebu. They offered GAS (General Academic Strand), HUMSS (Humanities

and Social Sciences), TVL- HE ( Dressmaking NC II, Beauty and Nail Care NC-II

& Front Office Services NC II ).

San Isidro Night High School found inside the vicinity of San Isidro

Elementary School and some of the rooms are shared with the primary school,

Teaches students in grades seventh through tenth in Talisay City, Cebu. The

school has 3 instructional rooms and 0 non-instructional rooms, which are all

powered by a power grid. With 310 students, class size is around 103 students.

Respondents

Purposive and convenient sampling was used in determining the research

respondents. Those who are involved in ALS were part of the study and available

and willing to participate during the data collection. The respondents of this

research were the district and school coordinators, mobile teachers and learners

of the Alternative Learning System in Division of Talisay City. Mobile Teachers and

full-time District Alternative Learning System Coordinators are required to enlist at

least 75 learners for Nonformal Education (i.e Basic Literacy Program or

Accreditation and Equivalency Program) excluding enrollees of Informal Education

or InfEd (i.e. short term courses, livelihood training, etc.). All Mobile Teachers

(MTs) and District ALS Coordinators (DALSCs) are entitled to receive the teaching

aid and transportation allowances. Such allowances shall be used to defray

transportation expenses that they incur to reach all types of ALS learners in far-

flung areas and other types of barangays. On the other hand, the teaching aid
30

allowance is intended for purchase of supplies and/or reproduction of materials

they will use in the teaching-learning process DepEd (Order 59, s.2016). There

were 198 respondents in this study coming from Alternative Learning System

facilitators, coordinators and learners. Specifically, 6 mobile teachers (3 Male and

3 Female), 1 Female district coordinator, 5 school coordinators (3 Female and

2 Male ) a total of 12 ALS Implementers and 186 learners(113 Male and 73

Female).

Table 1
Distribution of the Respondents
Schools ALS Facilatators % Learners Total
Implementing ALS District ALS Mobile Teacher School ALS
Coordinator Coordinator
Maghaway Elementary 1 0 0 23 24
School
Lagtang Elementary 0 1 0 23 24
School
Bulacao Elementary 0 1 0 23 24
School
Tanke Elementary 0 1 0 23 24
School
Iba Elementary 0 1 0 23 24
School
Talisay City 0 1 1 28 30
Central Elementary School
Talisay City 0 1 0 23 24
National High School
Tabunoc Central 0 0 1 5 6
Elementary School
Tabunoc Night 0 0 1 5 6
High School
San Roque 0 0 1 5 6
National High School
San Isidro 0 0 1 5 6
Night High School
TOTAL 1 6 5 186 198
31

As shown in the Table 1, the 75 learners of Mobile Teachers and District ALS

Coordinators and of the 15 learners from the schools ALS coordinators, 30% of

learners in each Implementers were utilized for this research, a total of 12 ALS

Implementers and 186 Learners.

Maghaway Elementary School

Lagtang Elementary School


32

Bulacao Elementary School

Tanke Elementary School


33

Iba ElementarySchool

Talisay City Central Central Elementary School


34

Talisay City National High School

Tabunok Central Elementary School


35

Tabunok Night High School

San Roque National High School


36

San Isidro Night High School

Figure 3

Schools Implementing ALS in Talisay City, Cebu


37

ddd

Iba Elementary School

Maghaway Elementary Lagtang Elementary


School School
San Isidro Night High Bulacao Elementary
School School

Tabunok Central
Elementary School

Talisay City National


Tabunok Night
T High
High School
School

Talisay City Central San Roque National High


Elementary School School

Tanke Elementary School

Figure 4

Research Environment Respondents


38

Instruments

A researcher-made questionnaire was used in the study supplemented by

the documents. Some parts of survey questionnaire were paralleled from the

Functional Literacy Test (FLT).

Procedures for Data Gathering

The Data gathering followed procedures to go through the study:

Preliminary Preparation

Upon the approval of the research design, the researcher ask permission

from the schools division superintendent to conduct the study in the ALS

implementing schools. The data gathering instrument was developed based on the

readings of the researcher. This was substantiated analysis of the Department of

Education Enhanced Basic Education Information System (EBEIS) and Learner

Information System (LIS). The instrument mentioned the level of implementation

of ALS particularly as to instructional materials, physical facilities and equipment,

financial resources and linkages and cooperation from stakeholders.

Administration of the Questionnaire

After the approval to conduct the study, the ALS Implementers was

informed the purpose and importance of the research. The tools be administered

by the ALS coordinators, facilitators, mobile teachers and other teachers involved

in ALS implementation. Individual administration and interview be conducted on

some occasions. High confidentiality of the responses be strictly observed. The

interviews conducted in various ALS centers in Division of Talisay City. A

researcher-made brief questionnaire was also being provided in order to gather


39

the selected profile of the ALS Implementers to determine the age and gender,

highest educational attainment, years of experience as ALS implementor and

appropriate trainings and seminars attended. Also the profile sheet of learners to

determine the age and gender, civil status, highest educational attainment and

combined family monthly income.

1. Retrieval of the Questionnaire

After accomplishing the instruments of the ALS implementation evaluation,

the researcher retrieved the instruments and the data will be tabulated and

processed.

Treatment of Data

This study utilized the following statistical formula in the treatment of the data:

1. Simple Percentage. This was used to determine the percentage of the

responses of the respondents.

2. The weighted mean. This was utilized to analyze and interpret the

responses of the respondents.

3. Mode. This was used to assess and evaluate the attributes that were

chosen most often by the respondents.

4. Chi-Square. This was used to find the significant relationship between

ALS implementers and learners on the levels of ALS implementation in

Talisay City Division, Cebu

5. Scoring Procedures

The first part of the questionnaire was about the ALS teachers’ profile and

they answered by themselves. The ALS learners were chosen in a random


40

sampling using the Survey Sampling. A five point scale as introduced in the

questionnaire on the different items in each level of competencies, namely:

instructional materials, physical facilities and equipment, financial resources and

linkages and cooperation from stakeholders.

The responses are assigned to the following:

Mean Values:

Weight Interpretation Verbal Description

3.36 - 4 Excellent If the categories is highly possessed

2.6 - 3.35 Good If the categories is well possessed

1.76 - 2.5 Fair If the categories is possessed

1 .0 – 1.75 Poor If the categories is poorly possessed

The second part of the questionnaire was about the best practices related

to the level of implementation of ALS as perceived by the Implementers and

Learners. There were several items stipulated such as support from the LGUs

about the program, more participation from the out of school youth and adult

who are interested in ALS and permanent community learning centers. The

following parametric scale was used to describe the degree of the

aforementioned variables:

A questionnaire also develop intended to gather the selected socio-economic

profile of the ALS learners.

Percentage. To provide clear, objective valid and reliable presentation,

analysis and interpretation of the facts or information gathered in the study, the
41

simple percentage was used treating statistically the profile of the teacher and

learner respondents.

Weighted Mean. To determine the effectiveness of the ALS implementers in

the extent of their implementation in ALS, the weighted mean was utilized. The

formula is:

Pearson Product-Moment Coefficient Correlation. To determine the

implementers’ level of ALS implementation and their profile, the Pearson Product-

Moment Correlation was used. It employed the following formula:

Chi- Square (x2). The chi- square (x2) is used in finding the relationship

between the ALS implementation in DepEd,Talisay City Division of implementers

and learners.

Coefficient of Contingency. To test the significant relationship through the

Chi-square (x2) the coefficient of contingency as used. The formula is:

Scoring Procedure

Qualitative terms are qualified.

The adjectival or quantitative descriptions or scores were used in assessing

the ALS implementation of the ALS Implementers and best practice are presented

below:

Parametric Scale Adjectival Description

3.36 - 4 Excellent

2.6 - 3.35 Good

1.76 - 2.5 Fair

1 .0 – 1.75 Poor
42

DEFINITION OF TERMS

The following terms are defined operationally to clarify the text and for better

understanding and appreciation from the teachers.

Accreditation and Equivalency (ALS A&E) Test. This is formerly known

as the Non-formal Education A&E Test, is a paper and pencil test designed to

measure the competencies of those who have neither attended nor finished

elementary or secondary education in the formal school system.

Alternative Learning System. This is a parallel learning system to provide

a viable alternative to the existing formal educational instruction. It encompasses

both the non-formal and informal sources of knowledge and skills (Sec. 1.4 RA

9155).

Alternative Learning System for Differently-Abled Persons (ALS-DAP).

This refers as a project which aims to deliver Basic Literacy Program to the

special/differently abled children/OSYs/adults, e.g., hearing impaired learners who

have not availed of/have no access to the formal school system through

specialized approaches.

Arabic Language and Islamic Values Education in Alternative

Learning System (ALIVE in ALS). This is intended for the Muslim Migrants to be

able to positively contribute to the peace efforts of our government in order to

improve the quality of life of Muslim OSY and adults.

Attitude of Administrators. This is refers to the disposition and behavioral

responses shown by the administrators toward the implementation of the ALS

program in Division of Talisay City.


43

Attitude of Mobile Teachers. This is refers to the disposition and

behavioral responses manifested by the mobile teachers in carrying out the goals

of ALS.

Challenges. This term refers to the problems and concerns of the teachers

which are related to ALS implementation.

Community Learning Center (CLC). This is where the teaching-learning

process takes place between the learners and the literacy volunteer.

Cooperation from Stakeholders. This is refers to the degree of support,

participation and involvement of teachers, parents, government officials and the

teachers in the community who have stake in implementation of the ALS.

DepEd-delivered. This is refers to the implementation arrangement where

program is directly carried-out by DepEd ALS implementers such as the ALS

Mobile Teachers and District ALS Coordinators.

DepEd Partners-delivered. This term refers to the implementation of ALS

Programs by non-DepEd organizations such as Local Government Units (LGUs),

Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and other Government Organizations

(GOs), international donor agencies, church-based organizations and individuals

on a voluntary basis using their own resources.

DepEd-procured. This is refers to the implementation arrangement where

program is contracted by DepEd to service providers such as non-government

organizations and other government organizations and literacy volunteers.


44

Facilities and Equipment. This means the software, hardware and other

materials like projector, screen, television, radio and other necessary appliances

used in teaching- learning process used by ALS teachers.

Family Basic Literacy Program (FBLP). This is a literacy service learning

intervention utilizing literate family members to help non-literate members upgrade

their literacy skills and improve the educational opportunities of poor families in the

depressed, deprived and underserved (DDU) areas.

Financial Support. This is refers to the logistics or monetary support from

the lead implementer department, local government and other organizations which

are tasked to implement the ALS program.

Functional Literacy Test (FLT). This is to determine the level of learners

learning

Implementation. This is refers to the degree of realization and the level of

achievement of the Alternative Learning System in Division of Talisay City.

Indigenous Peoples Education. This is a research and development

project which aims to provide basic education support services to IP communities.

Informal Education for Disadvantaged Children. This is a program that

focuses on packaging of short-term educational activity that addresses the special

needs and interests of the street and working children. It intends to use life skills

active learning approaches/strategies aimed at developing/enhancing social, civic,

aesthetic, cultural, recreational physical and personal development

Instructional Materials. This is refers to the tools used in teaching adult

learners. These are the materials used in teaching under the ALS program.
45

Learners Portfolio. This must be made when a learner is registered into

ALS Program, may fashion and decorate the front of their portfolio as they desire,

inside the portfolio are the Personal information, Literacy Assessments, History of

skills, Learning goals and record of current progress with ALS.

Parent Education. This means a life skills short-term course that

addresses the special needs and interests of the parents to promote pride in their

work and ownership of their responsibilities as members of the family and their

community.

Problems Encountered. This is refers to the challenges and setbacks

experienced by the ALS coordinators and mobile teachers in carrying out the

objectives of the ALS program.

Profile. This is refers to the age, gender civil status, highest educational

attainment, years of teaching experience in ALS, trainings and seminars.

Proposed Development Plan. This is refers to the output of this study that

will suggest reforms and solutions to address the poorly implemented programs of

the ALS.

Radio-Based Instruction (RBI). This is an alternative delivery mode using

radio broadcast to deliver the ALS programs. As a form of distance learning, it is

able to develop access to education by transporting it to where the learners are.


46

Chapter 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

This chapter presents the relevant literatures and related studies to

expound the variables of this study.

Related Literature

The Department of Education informed the public that the Alternative

Learning System become a source of hope for many teachers who are outside the

formal school system. And they include learners who are behind bars. ALS

addresses basic education needs of school – age children who are out – of school.

Moreover, it caters to those who are beyond school age but who have not been to

school at all or those who have dropped out of school. It also seeks to reach those

living in far – flung areas and isolated communities. From Bureau of Alternative

Learning System (BALS) carriers out two Non formal Education Programs: a) the

Basic Literacy Program (BLP) for illiterates; and the b) Accreditation and

Equivalency (A&E) System for elementary and high school drop-outs. Teaching-

Learning Strategy – Alternative Learning System is flexible. It is anytime and

anywhere learning. It uses interactive modules and learning sessions at

community learning centers at an agreed schedule between the learners and the

learning facilitator. Primarily, ALS anchored on the teaching of life skills that goes

beyond obtaining information but is more concerned about the application of the

competencies and values to develop within the individual the power to make

decisions towards improving the quality of his or her life. Programs Delivery

Mechanisms – ALS programs are delivered in various delivery modes such as


47

face-to-face group learning, family or household approach, individual tutorial and

others. An Information Communication Technology component is being tested in

the radio-based approach where learning modules are being aired in selected

provinces of the country. ALS programs are either implemented by DepEd ALS

implementer or contracted to provide service providers. From DepEd

Memorandum no. 443 s. 2007, state. “in order to standardize the program

operations and ensure increased access, efficiency and effectiveness of the

program delivery, the Bureau of Alternative Learning System (BALS) has

developed the United Guidelines for the Alternative Learning System (ALS)

Contracting Scheme. This set of guidelines cover the Basic Literacy (BL), School

Adults (BPOSA) programs of the ALS. To support this unified contracting scheme,

there is also a unified fund known as Field Operations Funds for ALS as provided

for in the General Appropriations Act, R.A. No. 9162, Special Provision No. 11.

This fund replaces the former Literacy Service Contracting Scheme (LSCS),

Learning Support Delivery System (LSDS) and Balik–Paaralan Para sa Out-of-

School Adults (BPOSA) funds used for field implementation of the above ALS

program.The Bureau of Alternative Learning System (BALS) implements two

major programs namely, the Basic Literacy Programs (BLP) and the Accreditation

and Equivalency (A&E) Program. Funds were used separately to implement the

two programs, i.e., BLP using the LSCS funds and A&E using the LSDS funds.

The funds from the Central Office are transferred to the Regional Office (RO).

Using these funds, the Division Office (DO) contracts the services of qualified

education service providers. Service Providers (SPs) are private groups or


48

organizations, private and state universities and colleges (SUCs) as well as other

government organizations, who are awarded the funds in order to deliver the

BL/A&E Programs to target learners in the community. Selection of Service

Providers is based on criteria and award is made covering specific contract

periods. Consequently, there were two different implementations guidelines for

contracting the services of service providers for the two ALS programs. In order to

standardize program operations and ensure increased participation, efficiency and

effectiveness of programs delivery, there is now a consolidation of the funds as

well as unification of the guidelines for service contracting. Bureau of Non-Formal

Education is hereby renamed to Bureau of Alternative Learning System (BALS)

(Section, EO 356). The Bureau of Alternative Learning System shall have the

following functions: a. address the learning needs of the marginalized groups of

the population including the deprived, depressed and undeserved citizens; b. to

coordinate a with various agencies for skills development to enhance continuing

employability, efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness in labor market; c.

ensure the expansion of access to education opportunities for citizens of different

interest, capabilities, demographic characteristics and socio-economic origins and

status; and d. promote certification and accreditation of alternative learning

programs both formal and informal in nature for basic education, (Sec. 2, E.O.

356). The Bureau of Alternative Learning System mandate the following: 1. The

Department of Education is undertaking significant initiatives to attain Education

for all; 2. Two Bureaus of DEPED (Bureau of Elementary Education and

Secondary Education) are responsible for the in-school children through the formal
49

school system. The third Bureau of Alternative Learning System (BALS) addresses

basic education needs of school – age children who are out-of-school and more

importantly those who are beyond school age but who have not been to school at

all or those who have dropped out of school especially those living in far-flung and

isolated communities of the country; and 3. Education for All states that: “the

existing Bureau of Alternative Learning System of the DEPED should be

developed, strengthened and mandated to serve as the government agency to

guide the evolution of the country’s alternative learning system. Among its key

functions should be to promote, improve, monitor and evaluate, alternative learning

intervention for functional literacy of out-of school youth, and adults for ethnic

minorities and other groups with special educational needs that cannot be met by

school, and for desired competencies that are part of lifelong.” To reach this

marginalized group of learners. BALS implements non formal and informal school

system. In developing the organizational structures, the Department of Education

also identified the themes or organizational strands common to all levels of the

Department. These organizational strands reflect the similarity of functions and

objectives of offices and units. The organizational strands are as follows: The

Office of the Secretary (OSec) provides overall leadership and direction at the

national level. Attached and support agencies to DepEd are included under the

OSec. Curriculum and Instruction; this strand ensures that the organization

focuses on the delivery of a relevant, responsive, and effective basic education

curriculum around which all other strands and offices provide support. Strategic

Management; this strand enables the organization to focus on long-term directions


50

and interface with the internal and external environment and stakeholders.

Governance and Operations; this strand ensures the capacity of the organization

to continuously improve and be strategic in managing the environment for which

“teaching and learning” takes place. In accordance with RA 9155, the Secretary of

Education delegates the supervision of field offices (regional and schools division

offices) to the Undersecretary for Governance and Operations. The Office of the

Regional Director provides leadership and management of the Department’s

mandate at the regional level; and The Office of the Schools Division

Superintendent provides local management and administration of the

Department’s mandate at the schools division level. The Alternative Learning

System is under the management and staff of Curriculum and Instructions

Department in the Central Office and Curriculum Implementation Development

(CID) in the DepEd Division Offices while the ALS Accreditation and Equivalency

Test (A&E) is under the management of Bureau of Education Assessment (BEA).

Learning can be defined formally as the act, process, or experience of acquisition

of knowledge or skills. In contrast, memory can define the capacity of storing,

retrieving, and acting on that knowledge. Learning helps us move from novices to

experts and allows us to gain new knowledge and abilities. Learning strengthens

the brain by building new pathways and increasing connections that we can rely

on when we want to learn more. Definitions that are more complex add words such

as comprehension and mastery through experience or study. Physiologically,

learning is the formation of cell assemblies and phase sequences. Children learn

by building these assemblies and sequences. Adults spend more time making new
51

arrangements than forming new sequences. Our experience and background

allow us to learn new concepts. At the neurological level, any established

knowledge (from experience and background) appears to be made up of

exceedingly intricate arrangements of cell materials, electrical charges, and

chemical elements. Learning requires energy; re-learning and un-learning requires

even more. We must access higher brain functions to generate the much-needed

energy and unbind the old. Remarkably, teachers can learn from the moment of

birth. Learning can be and should be a lifelong process. Learning should not be

defined by what happened early in life, only at school. They constantly make sense

of their experiences and consistently search for meaning. In essence, they

continue to learn.Though humans like the familiar and are often uncomfortable with

change, the brain searches for and responds to novelty. Rote learning frustrates

them because the brain resists meaningless stimuli. When they invoke the brain’s

natural capacity to integrate information, however, they can assimilate boundless

amounts. This may explain why sometimes a tough class, one they never thought

you would get through, was one of your all-time favorites. Western society once

believed adults did not learn. Even today, if you ask a group why adults cannot

learn, it may surprise you how many begin answering the question without

challenging the premise. Unfortunately, many adults deny themselves what should

be one of the most enriching parts of life because they assume they cannot

learn.They can learn from everything the mind perceives (at any age). Our brains

build and strengthen neural pathways no matter where we are, no matter what the

subject or the context. In today’s business environment, finding better ways to


52

learn will propel organizations forward. Strong minds fuel strong organizations. We

must capitalize on our natural styles and then build systems to satisfy needs. Only

through an individual learning process can we re-create our environments and

ourselves (Tschannen - Moran, 2007). The Department of Education shall take

into account the regional and sectoral needs and shall encourage local planning in

the development of educational policies and programs are as follows: Basic

Education is the education intended to meet the basic learning needs which lays

the foundation on which subsequent learning can be based. It encompasses early

childhood, elementary, high school education and alternative learning system for

out – of school youth and adult learners that includes education for those with

special needs. Quality Education is the appropriateness, relevance and excellence

of the education given to meet the needs and aspiration of an individual and

society. Each of these dimensions are measured by a subtest of the Organizational

Health Inventory for Elementary Schools (OHI-E). The reliability scores for the

scales were relatively high: Institutional Integrity, Collegial Leadership, Resource

Influence, Teacher Affiliation and Academic Emphasis. A factor analysis of several

samples of the instrument supports the construct validity of the concept of public

schools’ culture (Hoy, Tarter, & Kottkamp, 2001; Hoy &Tarter, 2007). In addition,

the predictive validity has been supported in other studies. See Hoy, Tarter, and

Kottkamp (2001).

Institutional Integrity. The overall reputation of the institution is of critical

importance to Iowa State University leaders. Faithful pursuit of the institutional

mission, compliance with local, state, and federal laws and regulations, and
53

responsiveness to the needs of students, faculty, staff, and other constituents are

top priorities of the administration. Academic administrators work closely with

faculty to maintain and enhance academic quality while seeking to embrace best

practices in institutional policies and procedures. Highly aware of their

responsibility to the public, University personnel administer curricular and

co−curricular programs, including extension and auxiliary activities, in the best

interest of the constituencies that they serve. The evidence in the sections will

demonstrate that Iowa State upholds and protects its integrity while always looking

for areas to improve overall institutional effectiveness.

Collegial leadership is characterized by supportive and democratic

behavior. The leader is not only focused with task achievement, but is considerate,

helpful, and genuinely concerned about the social welfare of teachers. The leader

is caring, but also the faculty aware what is expected of them while maintaining

definite standards of performance (Tschannen - Moran, 2007). Traits of a collegial

leadership of the principal as measured on the Organizational Climate Index

include the following: “The principal treats the faculty members as equal, maintains

definite standards of performance, friendly and approachable and explores all

sides of topics and admits that other opinions exist”(Ho y, Sweetland & Smith,

2002). Following up on the work of Hoy and Sabo (2008), Hoy, Hannum and

Tschannen - Moran (2008) condensed all 12 factors of the Obsessive-Compulsive

Data Quality (OCDQ) and the Omega Healthcare Investors (OHI) into the same

four factors to study the climate in 86 New Jersey middle schools. They also

attained student achievement scores in reading, writing, and math along with
54

socioeconomic data for students during the same year that teacher climate data

was collected and again two years later. They concluded that environmental press,

collegial leadership, teacher professionalism, and academic press play a

significant role in raising student achievement. The correlation between student

achievement and climate was similar even after two years, demonstrating that high

performing middle schools are places where teachers are committed to their work,

respect their colleagues, and view their principal as supportive and enabling.

Mascall and Leithwood (2008) even replaced academic emphasis with

organizational citizenship in their study on academic optimism and distributive

leadership because “successful change in schools depends on the willingness of

teachers to engage in work with their colleagues outside of their own

classrooms”(p. 216). Collegial leadership, faculty trust in colleagues, and

academic emphasis strongly correlate with organizational citizenship (DiPaola

&Hoy, 2005). Supportive leadership is the key to getting teachers to do beyond

what is formally expected. Collegial leadership affords more decision - making

opportunities to teachers. Sweetland and Hoy ( 2000 ) concluded that the two

strongest climate predictors of teacher empowerment were collegial leadership

and academic press. They stated, “Schools in which the principal’s leadership is

collegial, teachers demonstrate a high degree of professionalism, and there is a

strong internal academic press are conducive to teacher empowerment”

(Sweetland & Hoy, 2000, p. 720). Mascall and Leithwood ( 2008 ) discovered that

the more academically optimistic are teachers, the more likely they are to report

that leadership is distributed in their schools in a planfully - aligned pattern.


55

Teacher empowerment must be authentic in order to be effective (Malen et al.,

2000; Marks & Louis, 2007). Teachers are not impressed by school health who

share decision - making only because it is mandated by superiors (Malen &

Ogawa, 1988; Malen et al., 2000).Teachers must feel like they are trusted by their

administrators as professionals who are capable of making choices to help the

organization. Collegial leadership is the key component that allows school head to

release power to teachers whom they trust. The academic optimism of school

evolved from general work on positive psychology, which goes beyond the

traditional focus on pathology to examine human experience in terms of hope and

fulfillment; that is, academic optimism is rooted in humanist psychology. The

theoretical foundations of academic optimism are Albert Bandura's social cognitive

and self-efficacy theories, James Coleman's social capital theory, Wayne Hoy and

his colleagues' work on culture and climate, and Martin Seligman's study of learned

optimism. Conceptions of optimism treat it as a cognitive characteristic - a goal or

expectancy based on knowledge and thinking, but our conception of academic

optimism includes both cognitive and affective (emotional) dimensions and adds a

behavioral element. Collective efficacy is a group belief or expectation; it is

cognitive. Faculty trust in parents and students is an effective response. Academic

emphasis is the push for particular behaviors in the school workplace; it captures

the behavioral enactment of efficacy and trust. Optimism is the overarching theme

that unites efficacy, trust, and academic emphasis because each of these

elements contains a sense of the possible. The three (3) facets interact with each

other to produce a positive force for learning. These elements are not only similar
56

in nature and function but also in their potent and positive influence on student

achievement; in fact, Hoy and his colleagues (Hoy et al., 2006) have demonstrated

at the collective level that the three properties of schools come together in a unified

fashion to create a positive academic environment, which they label academic

optimism of a school. Further, they demonstrate that the academic optimism of the

school positively influences school achievement even controlling for

socioeconomic status (SES), prior student achievement, and urbanity. Additional

research (McGuigan & Hoy, 2006; Smith & Hoy, 2007) has also supported the

academic optimism link with student achievement in urban schools and elementary

schools, namely: 1. The school sets high standards for performance; 2. Students

respect others who get good grades; 3. Students seek extra work so they can get

good grades; 4. Academic achievement is recognized and acknowledged by the

school; 5. Students try hard to improve on previous work; 6. The learning

environment is orderly and orderly; 7. The students in this school can achieve the

goals that have been set for them; and 8. Teachers in this school believe that their

students have the ability to achieve academically. Alternative Learning System is

a ladderized, modular non-formal education program in the Philippines for

dropouts in elementary and secondary schools, out-of-school youths, non-readers,

working Filipinos and even senior citizens. It is part of the education system of the

Philippines but an alternative to the regular classroom studies where Filipino

students are required to attend daily. The alternative system only requires students

to choose schedules according to their choice and availability. The program has

two different schematics for conducting instruction; school-based and community-


57

based. On the school-based program, instructions are conducted in school

campuses while in the community-based program, formal instruction are

conducted in community halls or on private places. The ALS program follows a

uniform lesson modules for all academic subjects covering the sciences,

mathematics, English, Filipino, social studies, current events among others.

Delivery of instructions are provided by government-paid instructors or by private

non-government organization. Aside from schematics, the program has two levels;

elementary and secondary. Students have to start from elementary level, then

proceed to high school level. If a student is a graduate of elementary under a formal

classroom system, the student is automatically admitted to the secondary levels

depending on which year level the student stopped schooling. Program

administration is held by the Department of Education, an agency of the

government of the Philippines in charged in providing education to all Filipinos.

Private non-government organization may deliver the program but still under the

supervision of the Philippine education agency. After finishing the curriculum, all

participants of the program belonging to a particular education district are given

the final comprehensive examinations covering all subject areas in the curriculum.

Successful examinees are then grouped together in a closing ceremony where

they are given their certificate of completion either for the elementary or secondary

level (McDonald, 2012). Elementary. If a student has never reach the first grade,

the student will be admitted in the Grade 1 level with the corresponding module of

instruction given. The students has to finish all the modules for the first grade level

and pass assessment test before proceeding to the next level. After successfully
58

finishing all the modules, the students are given the comprehensive examinations

prior to admission in the graduation. High School. The procedure for the secondary

level is the same as the elementary level. Once the student is graduated in the

secondary level, he or she may opt to enroll in the tertiary level without need for

attending in the formal classroom system, hence the name alternative learning

system. Normally, under the education system of the Philippines, no student is

allowed to enter tertiary level of education without high school diploma. The

alternative system is the other path and opportunity to access vocational

technology or college education in the Philippines. The program covers mostly

among dropouts in elementary and secondary schools, out-of-school youths, non-

readers, working teachers and even senior citizens wanting to read and write.

Students enrolled under the classroom-system are disallowed to participate in the

program. Age level, economic and personal circumstances are among the

determinants in availing the program (McDonald, 2012). The Alternative Learning

System evolve from the non-formal education that has been conducted by the

government of the Philippines. Previously, non-formal education was mostly

concentrated in instructions in livelihood skills training with basic reading and

writing incorporated in the module. Under the current system, skills training and

livelihood training have been excluded and established as a separate education

system. Skills training had become a stand-alone program with Technical

Education and Skills Development Authority (Philippines) taking charge of the

program. The Alternative Learning System is a way for the informal and busy

students to achieve elementary and high school education without need of going
59

to attend classroom instructions on a daily basis just like the formal education

system. Secondary education has now become a prerequisite in vocational

technology and college education in the Philippines. Livelihood trainings however,

do not need formal or non-formal education in the Philippines (McDonald, 2012).

Instructional materials are highly important for teaching, especially for

inexperienced teachers. Teachers rely on instructional materials in every aspect

of teaching. They need materials for background information on the subject they

are teaching. Young teachers usually have not built up their expertise whenever

they enter into the field. Teachers often use instructional materials for lesson

planning. These materials are also needed by teachers to assess the knowledge

of their students. Teachers often assess students by assigning tasks, creating

projects, and administering exams. Instructional materials are essential for all of

these activities. Teachers are often expected to create their own lesson plans. This

can be difficult, especially if the teacher has limited background knowledge on the

subject. Teachers are expected to have a wide variety of expertise in many

different fields. Often, they need instructional aides to supplement their knowledge.

Instructional materials can help provide background knowledge on the subject the

teacher is planning for, and offer suggestions for lesson plans. Lesson planning is

often the most stressful aspect of teaching. Teachers are usually dependent on

them to do their job properly (McDonald, 2012). When thinking about teachers

expectations for students, take a moment to brainstorm everything they do each

and every day. Also, think about those issues that are extremely important to them.

These may include things such as honesty, integrity, neatness, being prompt,
60

striving for personal best, and cooperation with others. Other expectations may

include what they want students to do when entering the classroom, leaving the

classroom, requesting a break or hall pass, sharpening pencils or getting supplies,

turning in homework, working as a group, or taking a test (McDonald, 2012). When

they stop to think about it, they actually have quite a few specific expectations of

their students. However, too often these expectations are assumed on their part

and never explained or outlined to students. How can they expect our students to

meet our guidelines and set procedures if they never communicate them?

Imagine that one are visiting a country that they have never seen before. When

they arrive, a list of cultural guidelines and laws are given to you to help them know

what is and is not acceptable. They read over these, and feeling confident that you

are aware of everything they need to know, they venture out for dinner. Upon

arriving at a restaurant, they enter and wait to be seated. The hostess comes and

beckons for they to follow her. They calmly follow her to their table. Suddenly she

turns around, looks down at their feet and begins to scream at them. They are

startled and do not really understand the problem. The hostess is now quickly

ushering them out of the restaurant. As the teachers are being pulled back towards

the exit they realize that everyone else is wearing closed toe shoes with socks

while they are wearing sandals. It is an unwritten rule, or expectation, that

everyone wear socks and closed shoes inside buildings. Unfortunately, this was

not in the list of guidelines and no one ever told them about this "unwritten rule".

Now they are flustered, they feel stupid, and feelings of anger and resentment

begin to build because they are being punished for not knowing the expectation.
61

While this anecdote is a bit far-fetched, it does come close to describing what

happens in many classrooms. This is the last thing they want to happen. When

students begin to feel flustered and resentful, we start to see behavior problems

that refuse to go away. Instead, one of their goals at the beginning of the school

year should be to explain, teach, and train their students in what is expected of

them while in their classroom. Now with the many different expectations we have,

is it possible to do this all in the first day? Absolutely not! Humans can only process

so much information in a given time. Instead, prioritize your expectations and go

over the most important ones on the first day. Then, throughout the first several

weeks, continue to teach and train their students in what is expected of them

(Banach and Gregory, 2001). For example, instead of going over the expectations

for group work on the first day, wait until they have a group activity planned.

Schedule some extra time, or even an extra class period, to explain and model

how they expect students to act when working as a group. Although this will take

up more time at the beginning of the year, it will be well worth it later on. You will

not have to continually train each time they work in groups. Instead, they will only

need to remind them before starting an activity. Now, when going over

expectations at the beginning of the year, they want to be sure to: maintain eye

contact with each student this type of body language helps keep students focused

on them; speak slowly and pause after each sentence -- this emphasizes the

importance of what they are saying and gives the brain time to process the

information; practice procedures over and over until they are a reflex for students;

use activities to help students think about and work with their expectations. For
62

example, students could show what an expectation Is/ Is Not; create a skit showing

what an expectation/ procedure should look like; draw pictures of what the

expectation looks like, sounds like, feels like; etc. Copying the rules does not fall

under this category. They want students to internalize these expectations, not feel

like they are being punished on the very first day of school. Stakeholders offer

important insight into each phase of program planning, implementation and

evaluation in the Alternative Learning System. Stakeholders are most commonly

involved at the beginning stages of program planning. They are able to provide

insight for the various needs that a program or curriculum should meet. Experience

shows that once the goals have been set in the first part of program development,

stakeholders are sometimes not consulted in latter stages of program

implementation and evaluation. This is unfortunate because stakeholders have the

potential to illuminate issues and needs during the course of program

implementation (Banach & Gregory, 2001). Frequently stakeholders who

participate in an initial needs assessment may not be the same stakeholders who

ultimately sustain the program. Consequently, eliciting on-going feedback and

keeping lines of communication open are crucial to program success. This is

particularly true in community-based youth development programs. A broad range

of stakeholders has the knowledge, daily life experiences and expertise that can

contribute to program success. Stakeholders may be involved in multiple roles and

various functions. Focus groups may be conducted to get initial ideas and reveal

community norms, history and players. Community mapping may be conducted to

learn about the important features, places and events. Volunteer opportunities,
63

advisory committees, participation in hiring processes, program committees, and

various other means can be explored. The important point is that if stakeholders

are valued, they will be welcomed and their voices heard. School culture is the

behind-the-scenes context that is reflects of the values, beliefs, norms, traditions,

and rituals that build up over time as teachers in a school work together—school

heads, teachers, students, parents, and community members. School culture

influences not only the actions of the school population, but also its motivations

and spirit (Peterson, 2009). Understanding school culture can help us to use "a

broader framework for understanding difficult problems and complex relationships

within the school" (Stolp, 2004). Sometimes called the school climate, school

culture often determines how teachers will think and act. School culture can affect

the way teachers relate with each other, students, parents, school heads, and the

community. Mentors help their protégé by encouraging them to understand how

school culture can influence and affect them. School culture affects how teachers

define their work (Rosenholtz, 2001). School culture can also affect how problems

are solved, the ways new ideas are implemented, and how teachers will work

together. A teacher's belief systems and values can change and adapt to the

culture that is dominant in the school. Beginners in isolated settings soon abandon

their initial humanistic notions about tending to students’ individual needs in favor

of a routine technical culture characterized by a more custodial view, where order

is stressed over learning, and where students are treated more impersonally,

punitively, and distrustfully (Rosenholtz, 2001). Walk into any school—stopping

by the office, the teachers' lounge, the cafeteria, and the playground — and you
64

can gain a sense of what characterizes the school's culture. Often, what teachers

are saying to each other will signal the type of climate within the school. School

cultures are thought to be located on a continuum, ranging from bureaucratic

(known also as standard or traditional) culture to collegial (or interactive) culture.

And there is one type of school culture that is a death knell for longevity of teaching

careers and an instigator of high teacher turnover in a school—the toxic culture—

which is evident in a negative ambience and dissatisfaction that is highly palpable.

Characteristics of the bureaucratic school culture include: School Head at the

helm; teachers are followers of the dictated regimen; Strong emphasis on

standardization, or following the book; Teachers work in isolation with little chance

for interaction with peers; Policies are mandated from above, with little or no input

from teachers; and Bureaucratic cultures leave many teachers feeling isolated and

devalued. There is little incentive to grow, and growth can be seen as threatening

to others. Turf-guarding is common. Bureaucratic cultures also encourage

individual teachers to solve the problem (which they see as a "the student's

problem") in their own classrooms. School Heads and parents are only called in

when the teacher cannot resolve the problem on his/her own in the classroom.

Characteristics of the collegial school culture include: collegiality; experimentation;

high expectations; trust and confidence; tangible support; reaching out to the

knowledge bases (ie. "going to the source of information", developing information

networks rather than trying to solve problems in isolation or assuming one person

has all the answers); appreciation and recognition; caring, celebration and humor;

involvement in decision making; protection of what's important (ie. not "throwing


65

the baby out with the bathwater"); traditions (ie. the rituals, ceremonies and

symbols that strengthen the school culture); and Honest, open communication;

(Butler & Dickson, 2007). Collegial cultures engender a sense of cohesiveness and

collaboration. Teachers are encouraged to grow. Community is treasured, and

sharing of resources and ideas is commonplace. Collegial cultures also value

involvement of parents, teachers, school heads and even students in solving

problems, which are seen as a social, not individual, challenges (Deal & Peterson,

2008). Characteristics of the toxic school culture include: View students as the

problem rather than as their valued clients; are sometimes part of negative

subcultures that are hostile and critical of change; believe they are doing the best

they can and don't search out new ideas; frequently share stories and historical

perspectives on the school that are often negative, discouraging, and

demoralizing; complain, criticize, and distrust any new ideas, approaches, or

suggestions for improvement raised by planning committees; rarely share ideas,

materials, or solutions to classroom problems; and have few ceremonies or school

traditions that celebrate what is good and hopeful about their place of work (Deal

& Peterson, 2008). Toxic cultures engender feelings of hostility and hopelessness.

The focus is on failure—failure of students, failure of programs, failure of new

ideas. Energy is spent on maintaining the negative values causing high levels of

stress for those unfortunate enough to be part of that culture. The field of education

lacks a clear and consistent definition of school culture. The term has been used

synonymously with a variety of concepts, including "climate," "ethos," and "saga"

(Deal 2003). The concept of culture came to education from the corporate
66

workplace with the notion that it would provide direction for a more efficient and

stable learning environment. Scholars have argued about the meaning of

CULTURE for centuries. Noted anthropologist Clifford Geertz (2003) has made a

large contribution to our current understanding of the term. For Geertz, culture

represents a "historically transmitted pattern of meaning." Those patterns of

meaning are expressed both (explicitly) through symbols and (implicitly) in our

taken-for-granted beliefs. A review of the literature on school culture reveals much

of Geertz's perspective. Terrence E. Deal and Kent D. Peterson (2000) note that

the definition of culture includes "deep patterns of values, beliefs, and traditions

that have been formed over the course of history." Paul E. Heckman (2003)

reminds us that school culture lies in "the commonly held beliefs of teachers,

students, and school head." These definitions go beyond the business of creating

an efficient learning environment. They focus more on the core values necessary

to teach and influence young minds. Thus, SCHOOL CULTURE can be defined as

the historically transmitted patterns of meaning that include the norms, values,

beliefs, ceremonies, rituals, traditions, and myths understood, maybe in varying

degrees, by members of the school community (Stolp and Smith 2004). This

system of meaning often shapes what teachers think and how they act.

Researchers have compiled some impressive evidence on school culture. Healthy

and sound school cultures correlate strongly with increased student achievement

and motivation, and with teacher productivity and satisfaction. Consider several

recent studies. Leslie J. Fyans, Jr. and Martin L. Maehr (2000) looked at the effects

of five dimensions of school culture: academic challenges, comparative


67

achievement, and recognition for achievement, school community, and perception

of school goals. In a survey of 16,310 fourth-, sixth-, eighth-, and tenth-grade

students from 820 public schools in Illinois, they found support for the proposition

that students are more motivated to learn in schools with strong cultures (Keefe

2003). In a project directed at improving elementary student test scores, Jerry L.

Thacker and William D. McInerney (2002) looked at the effects of school culture

on student achievement. The project they studied focused on creating a new

mission statement, goals based on outcomes for students, curriculum alignment

corresponding with those goals, staff development, and building level decision-

making. The results were significant. The number of students who failed an annual

statewide test dropped by as much as 10 percent. These results are consistent

with other findings that suggest the implementation of a clear mission statement,

shared vision, and school wide goals promote increased student achievement.

School culture also correlates with teachers' attitudes toward their work. In a study

that profiled effective and ineffective organizational cultures, Yin Cheong Cheng

(2003) found stronger school cultures had better motivated teachers. In an

environment with strong organizational ideology, shared participation, charismatic

leadership, and intimacy, teachers experienced higher job satisfaction and

increased productivity. School heads who are interested in changing their school's

culture should first try to understand the existing culture. Cultural change by

definition alters a wide variety of relationships. These relationships are at the very

core of institutional stability. Reforms should be approached with dialogue, concern

for others, and some hesitation (Keefe 2003). One strategy was outlined by Willis
68

J. Furtwengler and Anita Micich (2001). At a retreat, students, teachers, and school

heads from five schools were encouraged to draw visible representations of how

they felt about their school culture. The idea was to "make thought visible" and

highlight positive and negative aspects of their respective school cultures.

Teachers, parents, and school heads were able to identify several areas that would

benefit from change. Likewise, school artifacts such as the routines, ceremonies,

rituals, traditions, myths, or subtle difference in school language can provide clues

for how to approach cultural change. School artifacts change over time. A principal

may decide to shorten time between classes only later to find out that this time was

important for teacher interaction and unity. Paying attention to such routines,

before changing them, may provide valuable insights into how school cultures

function. A formal and well-tested instrument for approaching cultural change is

NASSP's Comprehensive Assessment of School Environments' Information

Management System (CASE--IMS). This instrument focuses on leadership styles,

organizational structure, beliefs and values, classroom satisfaction, and

productivity. CASE--IMS offers a diagnostic assessment that focuses on the entire

school environment (Keefe 2003). A coherent vision specifies the particular values

and beliefs that will guide policy and practice within the school. Ideally, the school

board and superintendent set a broad vision for all schools in the district, and,

within that context, the principal coordinates the process of arriving at a particular

vision for each school. The creation of a vision is not a static event, because the

vision must change as culture changes. As Peter Senge (2000) notes, "At any one

point there will be a particular image of the future that is predominant, but that
69

image will evolve." The principal who is able to adapt a vision to new challenges

will be more successful in building strong school cultures. A vision for creating a

healthy school culture should be a collaborative activity among teachers, students,

parents, staff, and the principal. Michael G. Fullan (2002) writes, "Whose vision is

it?" "School Head," he says, "are blinded by their own vision when they must

manipulate the teachers and the school culture to conform to it." A more useful

approach is to create a shared vision that allows for collaborative school cultures

(Keefe 2003). The most effective change in school culture happens when school

head, teachers, and students model the values and beliefs important to the

institution. The actions of the principal are noticed and interpreted by others as

"what is important." A principal who acts with care and concern for others is more

likely to develop a school culture with similar values. Likewise, the principal who

has little time for others places an implicit stamp of approval on selfish behaviors

and attitudes. Besides modeling, Deal and Peterson suggest that school head

should work to develop shared visions--rooted in history, values, beliefs--of what

the school should be, hire compatible staff, face conflict rather than avoid it, and

use story-telling to illustrate shared values. More practical advice comes from Jane

Arkes, a principal interviewed by Stolp and Smith: work on team-building; put your

agenda second; know that you don't have all the answers--everyone has

limitations; learn from students and staff; put teachers before paper. Finally and

most important, school head must nurture the traditions, ceremonies, rituals, and

symbols that already express and reinforce positive school culture (Keefe, 2003).
70

Related Studies

In the study of Beyans and Miech (2007), it said that an organizationally

healthy school environment is associated with favorable student and staff

outcomes and thus is often targeted by school improvement initiatives. However,

few studies have differentiated staff-level from school-level predictors of public

schools’ culture. Social disorganization theory suggests that school-level factors,

such as faculty turnover, student mobility, and concentration of student poverty,

would be negatively associated with public schools’ culture, but these relationships

may be moderated by staff-level factors. The Beyans and Meich (2007) study

examined the association among school- and staff-level predictors of staff-

perceived public schools’ culture (eg, academic emphasis, collegial leadership,

and staff affiliation), as measured by the Public Schools’ Culture Inventory. Subban

and Sharma (2005) investigated the attitudes of mainstream teachers toward the

philosophy of inclusive education. Results suggest that teachers in Victorian

schools generally hold positive attitudes toward the inclusion of students with

disabilities into mainstream settings. These positive views may be attributable to

an increase in the awareness of students with disabilities among the respondents,

possibly due to renewed efforts by the Department of Education, Victoria to

educate teaching personnel regarding their roles as inclusive educators. It is

evident that the inclusion of students with disabilities into regular classrooms is

additionally viewed as nurturing increased feelings of tolerance and respect among

all participants within the inclusive setting. However, a student's level of disability

may emerge as a factor shaping the attitudes of teachers to the inclusion of


71

students with disabilities. Respondents were also strong in their expression of a

need for more information, knowledge, and expertise in their attempts to include

students with disabilities into mainstream classrooms. Respondents who had

members of their family with a disability, and who had worked closely with teachers

with disabilities, appear to have heightened awareness, when it came to including

students with disabilities into the regular classroom. Further, the responses of

participants revealed that previous experience with including students with

disabilities into regular settings appears to better prepare teachers for inclusion.

The findings of this study should be interpreted in the light of the following

limitations. Findings were largely based on self-reports by mainstream teachers;

there will always be some doubt as to whether teachers' responses reflect their

true attitudes and concerns regarding the inclusion of students with disabilities into

mainstream settings. Responses should therefore be interpreted with caution. This

study only investigated a limited number of variables related to the attitudes and

concerns of mainstream educators regarding the inclusion of students with

disabilities into their classrooms. There are undoubtedly other variables that should

be considered, when ascertaining such attitudes and concerns. The influence of

factors such as those relating to systemic supports including school culture,

language, and geographic location have not been considered. Future

investigations may consider the influence of these variables on teacher attitude

and concern about inclusive education. The preceding literature and studies

provided a direction and bases in developing the research problem and in the

interpretation of data.
72

Chapter 3

PRESENTATION, DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of the data gathered

from the questionnaires administered to the respondents.

Part I of this chapter reveals the profile of the ALS Implementers in terms of

age and gender, highest educational attainment, years of experience as ALS

Implementor and appropriate trainings and seminars and profile of ALS Learners

in terms of age and gender, civil status, highest educational attainment and

combined family monthly income.

The teacher’s ability to teach contributes significantly on the achievement

of learners in schools. Implementers found in schools and in the learning centers

have their different particularities and characteristics that distinguish one being

from the other.

It is on this basis that to decided and find out if the difference in teachers

profile will influence student’s achievement.

The learners profile is the complete picture of his/her learning preferences,

their strengths and weaknesses on where the learning begins.

Part II discusses the level of implementation of ALS as to the following

factors: instructional materials, physical facilities and equipment, financial

resources and linkages and cooperation from stakeholders. Learning materials are

one of the factor that is important on the ALS implementation and they can

significantly increase learner’s achievement by supporting learners learning.


73

Part III presents the rest significant relationship between the levels of ALS

implementation of the ALS Implementers and their age and gender, highest

educational attainment, years of experience as ALS Implementor, appropriate

trainings and seminars and learners combined family monthly income.

It is precisely determined the Implementers-learners profile, their

competence and performance in the ALS implementation in Talisay City Division.

Part IV displays the best practices related to ALS implementation in terms

of support from the LGUs about the program, more participation from the out of

school youth and adult who are interested in ALS and permanent community

learning centers.

PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENT GROUPS

This portion shows the profile of the respondents the profile of the ALS

Implementers of Talisay City Division as to their age and gender, highest

educational attainment, years of experience as ALS Implementor and appropriate

trainings and seminars.

ALS Implementers :

Age and Gender. Age and gender play vital roles in analyzing the

responses of the respondents in terms of who and which age controls the

leadership roles in the institutions and who and which age dominates the teaching

world.
74

Table 2

Age and Gender of the Implementers

ALS Implementers

Male Female Total

Age F % F % F %

61-70 0 0 0 0 0 0

51-60 1 8.33 1 8.33 2 16.67

41-50 0 0 1 8.33 1 8.33

31-40 3 25 3 25 6 50

20-30 1 8.33 2 16.67 3 25

Total 5 41.67 7 58.33 12 100

Legend : F-Frequency %-Percentage

As what is reflected in Table 2 the age and gender of Alternative Learning

System Implementers, three (3) or 25.00 percent of implementers were between

ages 20-30. Most of the implementers who age 31-40, six (6) or 50.00 percent of

the total respondents. On the other hand only one (1) or 8.33 percent age 41-50

and the ALS implementers who are between 51-60 years old were only two (2),

who are 16.67 percent of the respondents. Lastly, none of the implementers who

were between 61-70 years old. In analyzing the age of the ALS Implementers,

most the implementers in Talisay City Division are range from 31-40 which were

50 percent in which at this age the teachers uses personal experience to enhance

and can affect learning to the learners. They can encourage active participation of

the out of school youth and adult to join the program in ALS. They already possess

experience and knowledge about teaching, leadership, and wisdom to lead the
75

learners. The new DepEd Secretary, Dr. Leonor Briones is pushing for a more

dynamic implementation of Alternative Learning System (ALS) to bring education

to more learners across the country. The ALS Program is a flagship to our

President Rodrigo Duterte and Deped Secretary, to help the OSY and OSA in the

country. This paved the way for the young and energetic teachers to be hired to be

part of the teaching force of Department of Education (DepEd). With regard to the

gender of the ALS Implementers, five (5) or 41.67 percent of the respondents are

male, while seven (7) or 58.33 percent are female. This means that female

teachers are dominant in the teaching profession and only few men are entering

the craft. The reason probably why women dominate school leadership is that more

women are in to teaching profession. However, men are not discriminated in this

craft; they are given equal opportunity to women. Sometimes, it is advantage to

the male teachers to become ALS Implementers to some factors that being an ALS

mobile teachers they have to go to one place to another and have a flexible time

to teach on which the availability of the time of the learners will be followed.

Highest Educational Attainment. The teacher is the essential figure in the

classroom from whom the lesson comes. For this reason, a look was made into

his qualification to identify how educationally and professionally prepared he is to

perform the delicate task of teaching.


76

Table 3

Highest Educational Attainment of the ALS Implementers

ALS Implementers

Educational Attainment F %

Doctoral Degree 0 0

Master’s Degree 2 16.67

BSED/BEED/AB with CAR 4 33.33

BSED/BEED/AB 6 50.00

Total 12 100

Legend : F-Frequency %-Percentage

As shown in the Table, there were 12 ALS Implementers in Talisay City

Division. None of them finish Doctoral Degree, two (2) or 16.67 percent of the

Implementers is a full-fledged M.A. Holder, four (4) or 33.33 percent are having

Complete Academic Requirements and six (6) or 50.00 percent of the ALS

implementers who are Bachelor Degree Holders.

The data show that most of the ALS Implementers are Bachelor’s Degree

holders, followed by with earned units towards the master’s degree or said to have

completed academic requirements (CAR) holders and lastly with Master’s Degree

Holder. Such findings imply that the teacher are very much concerned on their

professional growth and had exerted effort for their professional enhancement.

Years of Experience. Years experienced in teaching can be considered as

one of the key factor for effective teacher, thus many claimed that experience is

the best teacher.


77

Table 4

Years of Experience as ALS Implementor


ALS Implementers

No. of years in Service F %

21-above 1 8.33

16-20 2 16.67

11-15 1 8.33

6-10 5 41.67

1-5 3 25

Total 12 100

Legend: F-Frequency %-Percentage

As indicated in the Table the number of years of experience as an ALS

Implementor. Their experiences include the years of being classroom teacher,

whether in private or in public institution. Based on the Table, three (3) or 25

percent implementers has an experience between 1-5 years. Furthermore, five (5)

or 41.67 percent the majority of the implementers experienced 6-10 years. One (1)

or 8.33 percent experienced 11-25 and 21-above years as an ALS Implements.

However, two (2) implementers or 16.67 percent experience 16-20 years in

teaching the out of school youth and adult. The data reflect information that most

of the Implementers experienced are in the range within 6-10 years in teaching.

This meant that the most of the ALS Implementers of Talisay City Division are new

in the field of teaching the out of school youth and adult or in the ALS program.

Thus, the need to upgrade these teachers of the current trends in the profession
78

particularly in the ALS curriculum, which could develop them to be more dynamic

and proficient in their line of work.

Appropriate Trainings and Seminars. The training seminars/workshop

attended was included as among the variables considered in determining factors

that correlate with competencies and effectiveness. Mobile Teachers are

“specialized” teachers who live among the people in remote barangay of the

country and to conduct sessions for ALS, the District ALS Coordinators are

primarily designated to harmonize ALS initiatives in a district. Tainings and

Seminars are very useful to the ALS Implementers I help them understand the

least, last and lost learner in the country. The results of the survey are reflected in

Table 5.

Table 5

Appropriate Trainings and Seminars


ALS Implementers

No. of Trainings and F %


Seminars/workshops
10-15 2 16.66

6-10 3 25

1-5 7 58.33

Total 12 100

Legend F-Frequency %-Percentage

As shown in Table 5 there were seven (7) or 58.33 percent ALS

Implementers who have attended between 1 to 5 training, seminars/workshop.

Three (3) or 25 percent attended 6 to 10 5 training, seminars/workshop and two

(2) or 16.66 percent have attended 10-15 training, seminars/workshop. Based on


79

these findings, these indicated that the ALS Implementers in Talisay City Division

had a very limited number of appropriate seminars attended in their teaching

profession as a mentor of out of school youth/adult and not all of them attended

such seminars for their professional development, they should be given more

seminars and workshop either in the Division, Regional and Central level to

upgrade their professional growth.

ALS Learners

Age and gender. Table 6 presents the age and gender distribution

of the ALS learners of Talisay City Division, Cebu who were the respondents of

this study.

Table 6

Age and Gender of Learners


ALS Learners
Male Female Total

Age F % F % F %

27-above 13 11.50 6 8.21 19 10.21

22-26 18 15.92 20 27.39 38 20.43

17-21 51 45.13 33 45.20 84 45.16

12-16 31 27.43 I4 19.17 45 24.19

Total 113 100 73 100 186 100

Legend F-Frequency %-Percentage


Alternative Learning System Accreditation and Equivalency (A&E)Test

2015, qualification to take the test for elementary students presently enrolled in the

formal school system age 13 years old and for the dropouts with age of at least 11

years old on or before the day of the test. For high school students enrolled in the
80

formal school system with age 17 years old or older and for the dropout with age

of at least 15 years old on or before the day of the test. Usually in Philippine setting,

our elementary graduates’ age ranges from 12-13 years old and 16-17 years old

for junior high school.

As indicated in Table 6, majority of the learners in Talisay City Division,

Cebu are males which is 113 or 60.75 percent. Fifty one or 45.13 percent of males

are from ages 17-21 and thirty-three or 45.20 percent of females are also 17-21

years of age. This is followed by thirty- one or 27.43 percent of males ages 12- 16

years old and twenty (20) or 27.39 percent for females ages 22-26 years old. Only

the over-all, eighty four (84) or 45.16 percent of the ALS Learners are on the ages

of 17-12 years old. These data implies that most learner-respondents 17-21 years

old on which supposedly at these age one should be a college graduate or already

working.

Civil Status. Civil status play an important role in the people’s goal of

solidarity and progress and it has a big significance to the society.

Table 7

Civil Status

ALS Learners
Male Female Total
Civil Status F % F % F %

Married 9 7.96 21 28.76 30 16.12

Single 104 92.03 52 71.23 156 83.87

Total 113 100 73 100 186 100

Legend: F-Frequency %-Percentage


81

The data provided information that most of the learner-respondent were

single which is 156 or 83.87 percent and only thirty or 16.12 percent were married.

This implied that, not only learners who are single are interested to finish their

studies as well as the married learners for their future, but it is advantage if the

learners are still single because they don’t have children to take care of, while

having their ALS sessions. We cannot deny that some of the married learners

cannot attend the ALS classes because of their family chores or need to work for

their family but in ALS, parent are allowed to bring their kids while having sessions

as long that it will not interrupt the classes and they can concentrate the lessons.

Highest Educational Attainment. Educational attainment is a word used in ALS

to mention the highest level of education of an individual has established.

Table 8

Learners Highest Educational Attainment


ALS Learners
Male Female Total
F % F % F %

Grade 9 21 18.58 27 36.98 48 25.80

Grade 8 32 28.31 18 24.65 50 26.88

Grade 7 12 10.62 15 20.54 27 14.52

Grade 6 16 14.16 4 5.47 20 10.75

Grade 5 17 15.04 3 4.10 20 10.75

Grade 4 4 3.54 4 5.48 8 4.30

Grade 3 3 2.65 0 0 3 1.61


Grade 2 3 2.65 2 2.74 5 2.69
Grade 1 5 4.42 0 0 5 2.69
Total 113 100 73 100 186 100
Legend: F-Frequency %-Percentage
82

The data provided information that the learners-respondent were in the

position to help their educational requirements. It can be implied that the children

could get enough support from their parents and relatives to be able to go through

their schooling properly.

Table 8 reveals that 16 or 14.16 percent of male-respondent and four (4) or

5.47 percent of female-respondent finished grade 6, a total of twenty or 10.75

percent for elementary level and pursue their education through ALS program. In

Secondary level 21 or 18.58 percent of male-respondents and twenty-seven or

36.98 percent, total of forty-eight or 25.80 percent finished grade 9 on which these

learners are now in ALS to continue and hopefully finish their studies. But most of

the learner-respondents as shown in the data stopped their schooling in Grade 8

on which there were fifty or 26.88 percent.

Based on the ALS Management Information System (MIS) Form, there are

factors and reasons that the ALS potential learners answers during the initial

interview on why they stopped their studies.

1. High cost of education. Although Philippine public schools do not charge

tuition fees but consider also the meals and other expenses in the family

such as a family member falling ill, parent losing his job or when an

emergency occurs and cannot cope with school work and projects.

2. Schools are very far. These set of learners were beneficiaries of the old

government administration, where roads are not yet developed and

schools were concentrated mainly in the center of the town.


83

3. Employment/looking for work. The low income of their parents prevented

them from continuing higher education. But the most common problem

is poverty so the learners were forced to stopped and help their family.

4. Housekeeping/Housework. Learners are forced to assist with domestic

chores. Oftentimes, the family is in a very poor financial situation with

large number of family members.

5. Lack of personal interest. Many students gave personal reasons for

leaving school, which included the need to get a job, parenthood, or

having to care for family members. This also encompasses teens who

decide to drop out high school to join a gang or to be accepted in other

teen groups and street communities.

Combined Family Income. Income is important because with it, we can

afford the things we desire, such as paying and buying our needs. In real life, things

are not always so simple without money.

Table 9

Combined Family Monthly Income

Income Frequency Percentage

P 10,000.00 and above 8 4.30

8,000-9,000 11 5.91

6,000-7,999 16 8.60

4,000-5,999 54 29.03

2,000 and below 97 52.15


Total 186 100
Legend: F-Frequency %-Percentage
84

Table 9 shows the combined family income. The combined family monthly

income is grouped into five. Leading among them was the income from P2,000.00

and below a month where ninety-seven or 52.15 percent of the families of the

respondents belonged to the lowest bracket. This is followed by the fifty-four or

29.03 percent families of the learners belonged to the bracket group from

P4,000.00-P5,000.00. Sixteen or 8.60 percent had an income ranging from

P6,000.00-P7,000.00. Eleven or 5.91 percent families on which their income range

from P8,000.00 – P9,000.00. Only eight (8) or 4.30 percent had an income of

P10,000 and above. This is a reality and very typical of the families of the ALS

learners where the income is not sufficient, a reality where finances are in wanting,

a member of the family with a job but the salary is not enough “hand to mouth”

enough only to buy food, a lot of things can happen and can go wrong. The table

implied that, one of the reason why learners attend the ALS program because they

want to finish their schooling and earned a four year course or even a short

program from TESDA so that they can help and support their families, the only

method they can fulfill their dreams. Through ALS program flexibility of class

schedule and time they can attend sessions while they are working.

RESPONDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE ALS IMPLEMENTATION

ALS teachers and learners were made to perceive the ALS Implementation

in Talisay City Division, Cebu through different categories: instructional materials,

physical facilities and equipment, financial resources and linkages and cooperation

from stakeholders.
85

Instructional Materials

Learning is better facilitated when teacher use organized materials. It is

communication process in teaching between the implementers and learners. This

part of the study dole out the instructional materials of the ALS implementers as

perceived by the respondents.

Table 10

Instructional Materials

Indicator Implementers Learners

WM Interpretation WM Interpretation
1.Adequacy of Visual Aids in ALS 3.75 Excellent 3.20 Good
Classes

2.Integrate on the use of media in 3.16 Good 3.00 Good


the delivery of the lesson to
various subjects

3.Quality Instructional Materials 3.08 Good 3.30 Good


available during ALS sessions

4.Appropriateness instructional 3.66 Excellent 3.22 Good


materials to ALS learner

5.Relevance of instructional 3.58 Excellent 3.34 Excellent


materials use during ALS session

Overall Average 3.44 Excellent 3.21 Good


Weighted Mean
Legend: 3.36 - 4 Excellent, 2.6 - 3.35 Good, 1.76 - 2.5 Fair, 1 .0 – 1.75 Poor

Teaching on the 21st century learners is not easy task, teachers must be

cautious to the methods used and must enrich the skills in dealing our learner

needs. The Table shows for the Implementers, that the overall average weighted

mean of 3.44, interpreted as Excellent. The findings clearly showed that the

Implementers preferences for the availability of instructional materials was directly


86

related to their educational preparations and are versatile in using these materials

depending on the needs and interests of the learners in a certain community. On

the learners perception there were four categories interpreted as good; adequacy

of visual aids used in ALS classes (3.20), adequacy of institutional media for

various subjects (3.00); quality of instructional materials in ALS (3.30), and

appropriateness of instructional materials (3.22). One were interpreted as

excellent which is the relevance and acceptability of instructional materials to ALS

materials learner (3.34). The instructional materials interpreted as good with the

overall average weighted mean of 3.21. This means that the implementers provide

appropriate materials for learning and select them for his learning sessions. It can

be implied that the implementers help best the learners on the learning sessions

and provide instructional materials for the improvement of the lessons. ALS regular

Implementers are entitled to receive allowances that shall be used to cover

transportation expense that they incur to reach all types of ALS learners in far-

flung areas and other types of barangays and teaching aid allowance is intended

to purchase of supplies and/or reproduction of materials they will use in the

teaching-learning process. Implementers must develop and integrate the use of

technology in community learning center to accommodate the K-12 curriculum.

The Implementers must understand that they must be willing to immerse

themselves the world of their learners, they should embrace the new digital reality.

If they cannot relate and just ignore change, then they would not able to make

learning relevant to the current and future needs of the digital generation.
87

Physical Facilities and Equipment

Physical facilities and equipment can have a deep influence on both teacher

and student outcomes and can affect health, behavior, engagement, learning, and

growth in achievement.

Table 11

Physical Facilities and Equipment

Indicator Implementers Learners

WM Interpretation WM Interpretation
1. Facilities and equipment for 3.33 Good 3.31 Good
ALS are always available.

2. Suitable facilities for ALS 3.16 Good 3.27 Good


instruction

3. Enough of materials and 3.16 Good 3.21 Good


facilitates for ALS

4. Relevance of ALS Facilities 3.08 Good 3 Good

5.Appropriateness of available 3.33 Good 3.21 Good


equipment

6. Relevance of learning center 3.33 Good 3.21 Good


instructional materials

7. Quality of learning center 3.33 Good 3.18 Good


resources for ALS

8. Appropriate of learning 3.16 Good 3.10 Good


instructional resources

9. Accessibility and safety of ALS 3.5 Good 3.31 Good


learning center materials

10. Availability of learning center 3.33 Good 3.80 Excellent


materials

Overall Average Weighted Mean 3.27 Good 3.26 Good

Legend: 3.36 - 4 Excellent, 2.6 - 3.35 Good, 1.76 - 2.5 Fair, 1 .0 – 1.75 Poor
88

The table shows that the facilities and equipment used by the ALS

implementers in DepEd Talisay City, Cebu, all the categories was rated Good with

the Overall Average weighted mean of 3.27 which is interpreted as Good. The

Learners perception on facilities and equipment shows that most of the categories

are interpreted as Good except one which were interpreted as excellent; the

availability of learning center materials with weighted mean of 3.80. The overall

average weighted mean is 3.26 interpreted as good. The Findings show that the

implementers know that the learning center climate is one of the most treasured

assets to the teaching-learning situation, they work hard to maintain a healthy

climate, a learner friendly environment in the learning center. Most of the learners

are satisfied with facilities and equipment which being used by the implementers

in the implementation on the program. Although there are learning centers in the

community on which the facilities are not always available just because they are

conducting there sessions on the learners residence or any vacant and available

lot to conduct ALS learning sessions.

Financial Resources and Linkages. The accomplishment of ALS implementation

will depend on the ability to bring partnership to the local level, to the provinces, to

the cities, to the municipalities, and the barangays. Cultivate and coordinate

partnerships with the private sector, international agencies, national government

agencies, LGUs, and other community-based groups involved in mobilizing

donations and to ensure that these are reliable and associated with the goals of

the DepEd.
89

Table 12

Financial Resources and Linkages

Indicator Implementers Learners

WM Interpretation WM Interpretation
1. Provided Funds for overall 3.42 Excellent 3.31 Good
ALS program implementation

2. Immediate release of funds for 3.33 Good 3.21 Good


ALS

3. Appropriation of ALS Projects 4.33 Excellent 3.00 Good

4. Availability of fund for special 3.5 Good 3.10 good


program

5. Sufficiency of funds and 3.08 Good 3.21 Good


personal services

Overall Average Weighted 3.53 Excellent 3.16 Good


Mean

Legend: 3.36 - 4 Excellent, 2.6 - 3.35 Good, 1.76 - 2.5 Fair, 1 .0 – 1.75 Poor

The Table for Financial resources for the Implementers shows that three

categories interpreted as good; Immediate release of funds for ALS with the

weighted mean of 3.33; availability of fund for special program with the weighted

mean of 3.5 and sufficiency of fund for salaries and personal services with the

weighted mean of 3.08. Two categories rated as excellent; provided funds for

overall ALS program implementation with weighted mean of 3.42 and appropriation

of ALS projects with weighted mean of 4.33. The overall average weighted mean

was 3.53 for the financial resources and interpreted as excellent. The perception

of learners on financial resources and linkages; all categories are interpreted as

good and with the overall average weighted mean of 3.16 with the interpretation

as good. The community and the school are two important social bodies. Both
90

community and school have organic linkage as the school cannot be seen as an

independent institution out-of-the-way from the society in which it is located.

The table implies that the support and linkages are sufficient given to the

ALS Implementers. Though there are legal bases on the use of the Special

Education Fund (SEF) “Section 272 of RA No. 7160, provides that the SEF shall

be allocated to the following: operation and maintenance of public schools,

construction and repair of school buildings, facilities and equipment,

educational research, purchase of books and periodicals and sports

development.” The Talisay City Government allocated funds for ALS program of

operation like training and seminars and special program related to ALS, but still

there are factors and areas in the implementation of the program in some of the

barangays in Talisay City the support is not really good simply because the

barangay officials are lack of orientation about ALS or the barangay do not have

funds allocation for ALS. The Implementers can fully implement of the Program if

the barangay officials cooperate and fully aware in the ALS program so that there

is no problem when it reaches in the community. Community involvement is one

of the major objective of the planning, implementation and monitoring of ALS

program. Several NGOs and LGUs have also played active role in activities

relating to strengthening and community awareness activities for the out of school

youth and adult.


91

Table 13

Cooperation from stakeholders


Indicator Implementers Learners

WM Interpretation WM Interpretation
1.Attendance in Meetings and 2 Fair 3.31 Good
Planning Session

2.Attendance and participation in 2.33 Good 3.21 Good


ALS activities

3.Involvement of Parents,Teachers 1.33 Poor 3 Good


and government officials

4. Moral support in ALS activities 1.92 Fair 3.10 Good

5. Provision of Constructive 2 Fair 2.06 Fair


Feedback

Overall Average Weighted Mean 1.92 Fair 2.93 Good

Legend: 3.36 - 4 Excellent, 2.6 - 3.35 Good, 1.76 -2.5 Fair, 1 .0– 1.75 Poor

For the cooperation from stakeholders, none of the Implementers

respondents interpreted as excellent, only one category interpreted as good which

is the attendance and participation in ALS activities with the weighted mean of

2.33. The involvement of parents, teachers and government officials was rated

poor with the weighted mean of 1.33 and three categories was rated fair;

attendance in meetings and planning session with the weighted mean of 2; moral

support in ALS activities with the weighted mean of 1.92 and provision of

constructive feedback with the weighted mean of 2. The overall average weighted

mean was 1.92 and interpreted as fair. As can be seen in the Table for the

learners, most of the indicator in cooperation from stakeholders were interpreted

as good; attendance in meetings and planning session with the weighted mean of

3.31, attendance and participation in ALS activities with the weighted mean of 3.2,
92

involvement of parents, teachers and government officials with the weighted

mean of 3 and moral support in ALS activities with the weighted mean of 3.10. The

category provision of constructive feedback interpreted as fair with the weighted

mean of 2.06. Overall average weighted mean of 2.93 and interpreted as good.

The implications on the data found in the table that, it is lack of the Parents

involvement, teachers and government officials. Implementers, learners, parents

and local authorities must be introduced to the importance and effective ways of

parent involvement and worked together to share their opinion, ideas, suggestions

and recommendations not only for the planning of a cooperation program, but also

for its successful implementation. The Cooperation from stakeholders are

important to sustain the ALS program in a certain barangay or community inviting

the out of school youth and adult to join the project by the Department of Education.

The Implementers cannot work alone, they really need help and support with the

people in the community.

Table 14
Attitude of ALS Implementers
Indicator Implementers Learners

WM Interpretation WM Interpretation

1. Dedication and Passion 3.42 Excellent 3.31 Good


2.Leadership potential 3.33 Good 3.80 Excellent
3.Knowledge of ALS curriculum 3.58 Excellent 3.34 Excellent
4.Teaching-learning management 4.33 Excellent 3.00 Good
skills/strategies

5.Relationship with both internal 3.5 Good 3.10 Good


and external stakeholders

Overall Average Weighted Mean 3.63 Excellent 3.31 Good


Legend: 3.36 - 4 Excellent, 2.6 - 3.35 Good, 1.76 - 2.5 Fair, 1 .0 – 1.75 Poor
93

As presented in the table, the attitude of ALS teachers as interpreted by the

Implementers; three (3) categories interpreted as excellent, dedication and

passion with the weighted mean of 3.42, knowledge of ALS curriculum with the

weighted mean of 3.58 and teaching-learning management skills/strategies with

the weighted mean of 4.33; two (2) categories interpreted as good, the leadership

potential with the weighted mean of 3.33 and relationship with both internal and

external stakeholders with the weighted mean of 3.5. In the learners interpretation

two(2) categories were interpreted as excellent, the leadership potential with the

weighted mean of 3.80 and knowledge of ALS curriculum with the weighted mean

of 3.34 and three (3) categories were interpreted as good, the dedication and

passion with the weighted mean of 3.31, and teaching-learning management

skills/strategies with the weighted mean of 3.00 and relationship with both internal

and external stakeholders with the weighted mean of 3.10. The overall average

weighted mean of excellent from the implementers and good from the learners.

Teachers attitude contribute much in the learning process of a student. The

dedication and love of the teacher towards their works influence the quality of

learners’ learning the subject. In the interview conducted among the ALS

implementers on how their performance evaluated by the administrators and

coordinators in ALS, all of them answers, that they are monitored and observed in

their community learning centers twice a month, they are required to submit

accomplishment report every month together with their daily time record and they

are also required to submit quarterly report. This implies that the implementers

passion to teach for the learners are commendable and based on teachers’
94

competence, the weakness were identified so the following programs is hereby

recommended for enrichment: conduct a seminar- workshop through the use of

modern technology to enrich mastery of the subject matter. Furthermore, realistic

learning approach in the lessons must be provided to related lessons to real life

positions; provide tools and techniques using the multi-media that will enhance

resourcefulness and innovativeness. To improve teaching performance a training

seminar concerning managing difficult learners and implement program at the

division level. And request stakeholders for funding in implementing ALS program

and intensify campaign/lobby for legislators to take in budget for ALS. As for the

learners’ performance, immersion are recommended for exposures, sessions to

address the weakness on limited awareness to the different cultures together with

their teachers.

Summary of Responses. The summary of responses on the ALS

Implementation as perceived by the implementers and learners is shown in Table

18. The total average responses on the levels of ALS implementation are 3.0

interpreted as Good. Along the area in the levels of ALS implementation, the

respondents described as Good: Instructional materials with the average weighted

mean of 3.32, in physical facilities and equipment with the average weighted mean

of 3.26, in financial resources and linkages with the average mean of 3.34 and in

cooperation from stakeholders with the average weighted mean 2.42.


95

Table 15

Summary on Responses on ALS Implementation

Level of ALS Implementation AS PERCEIVED BY AVERAGE INTERPRETATION

Implementers Learners

Instructional materials 3.44 3.21 3.32 Good

Physical Facilities and Equipment 3.27 3.26 3.26 Good

Financial Resources and Linkages 3.53 3.16 3.34 Good

Cooperation from Stakeholders 1.92 2.93 2.42 Good

Attitude of ALS Implementers 3.63 3.31 3.47 Excellent

Total Average 3.15 3.17 3.16 Good

Interpretation Good Good Good Good

Legend 3.36 - 4 Excellent , 2.6 - 3.35 Good, 1.76 - 2.5 Fair, 1 .0 – 1.75 Poor

It can be discussed that the ALS program in Talisay City are proficient in the

implementation of the program in all aspects of concerns in the communities like

in the instructional materials, physical facilities and equipment, financial resources

and linkages and cooperation from stakeholders. The Implementers of ALS assign

in DepEd Talisay City are skillful enough to implement the program but still they

are open and welcome of any change and suggestions for the improvement of the

ALS program.
96

SIGNIFICANT COEFFICIENT OF CORRELATION BETWEEN ALS

IMPLEMENTATION AND IDENTIFIED VARIABLES

This part of the study dwells in the relationship on the ALS Implementation as

to the instructional materials, physical facilities and equipment, financial resources

and linkages, cooperation from stakeholders and attitude of ALS Implementers

between the identified variables as to age and gender, highest educational

attainment, years of experience as ALS Implementor, appropriate trainings and

seminars and learners combined family monthly income.

Implementers

Significant relationship between the ALS implementers’ profile and the ALS

Implementation. Table 16

Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers Age and the

ALS Implementation

p
Correlation R Decision Interpretation
Parameters value
Fail to Reject Not Significant
.047 .884
Instructional Materials Ho
Facilities and Fail to Reject Not Significant
-.310 .326
Equipment Ho
Fail to Reject Not Significant
.149 .644
Financial Resources Ho

Cooperation of Fail to Reject


-.432 .161 Not Significant
Stakeholders Ho
Pearson

With the use of Pearson R Correlation, the test of significant difference

between the age of the ALS implementer and the implementation of the program,

it was revealed that there is no significant relationship between the age of the
97

implementer and the implementation of ALS. Therefore, the null hypothesis is

confirmed.

Table 17
Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers

Gender and the ALS Implementation

Chi square p
Decision Interpretation
Parameters value value
Instructional Materials Fail to Reject
0.010 .689 Not Significant
Ho
Facilities and Fail to Reject
0.343 .500 Not Significant
Equipment Ho
Fail to Reject
2.857 .159 Not Significant
Financial Resources Ho

Cooperation of Fail to Reject


1.861 .735 Not Significant
Stakeholders Ho
Chi square (Gender)

Using the Chi-Square to test the significant relationship between the ALS

implementers profile with regard to gender, it was shown that there is no significant

relationship between the implementers’ gender and the implementation of ALS,

Therefore, the null hypothesis is confirmed.

Table 18
Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers Educational
Attainment and the ALS Implementation

Correlation
p value Decision Interpretation
Parameters R
Instructional Materials .169 .599 Fail to Reject Ho Not Significant
Facilities and Equipment .333 .290 Fail to Reject Ho Not Significant

Financial Resources -.577* .049 Reject Ho Significant

Cooperation of
.110 .733 Fail to Reject Ho Not Significant
Stakeholders
Spearman Correlation (Education)
98

As what Table 21 presented on the significant relationship between the ALS

implementers profile with regard to educational attainment, it was revealed that

there is no significant relationship between the educational attainment of the

implementers and the success of ALS implementation. Thus, the null hypothesis

is confirmed.

Table 19

Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers


Years of Experience and the ALS Implementation

Correlation R p value Decision Interpretation


Parameters

.099 .761 Fail to Reject Ho Not Significant


Instructional Materials
-.331 .293 Fail to Reject Ho Not Significant
Facilities and Equipment
.000 1.000 Fail to Reject Ho Not Significant
Financial Resources
Cooperation of Stakeholders -.360 .250 Fail to Reject Ho Not Significant
Pearson Correlation (years’ experience)

As what Table 22 presented on the significant relationship between the ALS

implementers profile with regard to years of experience, it was revealed that there is no

significant relationship between the years of experience and the success of ALS

implementation. Thus, the null hypothesis is confirmed.


99

Table 20

Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers Trainings and Seminars

and the ALS Implementation

p
Correlation R Decision Interpretation
Parameters value
Fail to Reject
.406 .190 Not Significant
Instructional Materials Ho
Fail to Reject
.015 .963 Not Significant
Facilities and Equipment Ho
Fail to Reject
-.286 .368 Not Significant
Financial Resources Ho
Cooperation of Fail to Reject
.353 .260 Not Significant
Stakeholders Ho
Pearson Correlation (trainings and seminars)

With the use of Pearson R Correlation, the test of significant difference between the

trainings and the seminars attended by the implementers and the implementation of the

program, it was revealed that there is no significant relationship the trainings and seminars

and the implementation of ALS. Therefore, the null hypothesis is confirmed.

Table 21

Significant Relationship between the ALS Implementers Income and the ALS

Implementation

p
Correlation R Decision Interpretation
Parameters value
Fail to Reject Not
.223 .486
Instructional Materials Ho Significant
Fail to Reject Not
-.520 .083
Facilities and Equipment Ho Significant
Fail to Reject Not
-.362 .248
Financial Resources Ho Significant
Cooperation of Fail to Reject Not
-.504 .095
Stakeholders Ho Significant
Pearson Correlation (income)
100

The test reveals that significant relationship between the ALS Implementers income

and the ALS implementation program using the Pearson Correlation, it was revealed that

there is no significant relationship the income of the implementers and the implementation

of ALS. Therefore, the null hypothesis is confirmed.

Only financial resource correlated with education, yielded a significant negative correlation

(p=.049), less than .05. This indicates that those with higher education, those with masters

rated financial resources lesser, while those only with undergraduate rated financial

resources higher.

Leaners

Significant relationship between the ALS learners profile and the ALS Implementation.

Table 22
Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners Age and the ALS
Implementation

p
Correlation R Decision Interpretation
Parameters value
Fail to Reject Not
-.032 .781
Instructional Materials Ho Significant
Facilities and Fail to Reject Not
-.003 .979
Equipment Ho Significant
Fail to Reject Not
-.022 .850
Financial Resources Ho Significant
Not
Fail to Reject
Cooperation of -.075 .510 Significant
Ho
Stakeholders
Pearson R Correlation (age)
p > .05 = not significant
With the use of Pearson R Correlation, the test of significant difference

between the age of the ALS learner and the implementation of the program, it was

revealed that there is no significant relationship between the age of the learner and

the implementation of ALS. Therefore, the null hypothesis is confirmed.


101

Table 23

Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners Gender and the


ALS Implementation

Chi square p
Decision Interpretation
Parameters value value
Fail to Reject Not
2.74 .259
Instructional Materials Ho Significant
Facilities and Fail to Reject Not
1.31 .337
Equipment Ho Significant
Fail to Reject Not
.830 .531
Financial Resources Ho Significant
Cooperation of Fail to Reject Not
.137 .526
Stakeholders Ho Significant
Chi square (gender) p > .05 = not significant

Using the Chi-Square to test the significant relationship between the

learners profile with regards to gender, it was shown that there is no significant

relationship between the learners gender and the implementation of ALS,

Therefore, the null hypothesis is confirmed.

Table 24
Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners Combined Family
Income and the ALS Implementation
p
Correlation R Decision Interpretation
Parameters value
Fail to Reject Not
.011 .926
Instructional Materials Ho Significant
Facilities and Fail to Reject Not
.132 .245
Equipment Ho Significant
Fail to Reject Not
.119 .295
Financial Resources Ho Significant
Cooperation of Fail to Reject Not
-.074 .517
Stakeholders Ho Significant
Spearman rho Correlation
(income)
p > .05 = not significant
102

Table 25
Significant Relationship between the ALS Learners Educational
Attainment and the ALS Implementation

p
Correlation R Decision Interpretation
Parameters value
Fail to Reject Not
-.028 .807
Instructional Materials Ho Significant
Fail to Reject Not
-.003 .980
Facilities and Equipment Ho Significant
Fail to Reject Not
.142 .210
Financial Resources Ho Significant
Cooperation of Fail to Reject Not
-.080 .481
Stakeholders Ho Significant

Spearman rho Correlation (educational attainment) p > .05 = not significant

As what Table 19 presented on the significant relationship between the ALS

learners profile with regards to educational attainment, it was revealed that there

is no significant relationship between the educational attainment and the success

of ALS implementation. Thus, the null hypothesis is confirmed.

Pearson is used correlation for age, since age is a scale or ratio data,

meaning a data that is a true measure. Spearman is for correlation income,

educational attainment since they are in ranks, income was transformed in a form

of rank data, income was ranked based on NEDA categorization. Chi square was

used for relationship for gender since they are categories or nominal data. All of

these statistical tests are for determining relationships between variables. The

results show that, all the p values, for the statistical analysis are all above .05,

which means not significant. This means that age, income, educational attainment,

and gender of the have no bearing on the perceived level of implementation of

ALS.
103

PERCEPTIONS OF THE ALS IMPLEMENTERS ON THE ALS BEST


PRACTICES RELATED TO ALS IMPLEMENTATION

Table 26

Best practices related to ALS implementation in Talisay City Division, Cebu

INDICATOR WM Interpretation

More participation from the out of school youth and 3.31 Good

adult who are interested in ALS program


Talisay City Jail inmates participation in ALS 3.31 Good

program
Positive relationship of learner’s parents and 3.22 Good

implementers
Community cooperation on the affairs of the ALS 3.21 Good

programs and activities


Increase number of passers in ALS A&E Test 3.18 Good

Positive views of learners towards education 3.10 Good

Technical support from DepEd in the program of ALS 3 Good

Permanent community learning centers 2.06 Fair

Average Weighted Mean 3.0 Good

Legend: 3.36 - 4 Excellent, 2.6 - 3.35 Good, 1.76 - 2.5 Fair, 1 .0 – 1.75 Poor

Implementers were made to perceive the different ALS best practices

related as to the implementation of the program in Talisay City, Cebu. As revealed

in Table 20, the enrollment of ALS learners calendar year 2017 that can be found

in the Learners Information System (LIS) there were increased participation of out-

of–school youth and adult in the program maybe because the Secretary of

Education encouraged all the school drop-out and school leavers to attend ALS

sessions if they cannot get into the formal school system so that they can finish
104

their education. There were also increased Inmates enrollment in Talisay City Jail

even though they met only twice every week by the implementers to received

diploma from the ALS that can earned them points if they pass the A&E test. The

active involvement of the parents in the program can create positive relationship

amongst the implementers in the community that encouraged their children to join

the ALS. Most of the community in Talisay City already aware that there is an

existing program for the OSY/ OSA because of the implementers and the

department initiative to promote the program and letting the community attend in

program and affairs in ALS. Through the effort made by the ALS implementers the

ALS A&E passers are increasing every year and because of the advocacy social

mobilization every year made by the teachers there are more support coming from

the LGUs and NGOs received by the program. Most of the best practices related

to ALS implementation in Talisay City Division, Cebu were interpreted as Good

and only one interpreted as fair which is the permanent community learning

centers. The average weighted mean of these best practices are 3.26, 3.33, 3,

3.31, 2.06, 3.31,3.18, 3.10, 3.21 and 3.22 respectively. It had an overall weighted

mean of 3.0.
105

Chapter 4

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of findings

It was established that the developing a scheme of action for enhanced Alternative

Learning System in DepEd Talisay City as basis for Development Plan intervention

for the implementation of the program. This is to encourage active participation of

the out of school youth and adult to join the program in ALS. The ALS

Implementers are already possess experience and knowledge about teaching,

leadership, and wisdom to lead the learners. Female teachers are dominant in the

teaching profession and only few men are entering the craft. It is advantage to the

male teachers to become ALS Implementers to some factors that being an ALS

mobile teachers they have to go to one place to another and have a flexible time

to teach on which the availability of the time of the learners will be followed. The

teachers are very much concerned on their professional growth and had exerted

effort for their professional enhancement. On the years of experience as

implementer, majority of the implementers experienced 6-10 years in teaching.

There are limited number of appropriate seminars attended in their teaching

profession as a mentor of out of school youth/adult and not all of them attended

such seminars for their professional development. A review of climate studies is

necessary when discussing collegial leadership. A parsimonious view of school

climate uses both metaphors of health and openness. Collegial leadership

measured the openness of teacher - principal relationship while teacher

professionalism measured the openness of teacher interactions. Relying on


106

Parsons ’view of healthy service organizations, Hoy and Sabo not only focused on

the three levels of public schools’ culture, the institutional (environmental press),

the managerial (collegial leadership), and the technical (teacher professionalism),

they also concluded that a fourth level existed the client level. Therefore, they

proposed that four important relationships exist in schools: community - school

(environmental press), principal - teacher (collegial leadership), teacher - teacher

(teacher professionalism), and teacher - student (academic press). The high cost

of education is one of the factor that affects the respondents in some barangay in

Talisay, City Cebu and it followed by the learners must need to work to support

family, not only learners who are single but also the married learners are interested

to finish their studies for their future and most of the learner-respondents stopped

their schooling in Grade 8. In reality and very typical of the families of the ALS

learners the income is not sufficient, a reality where finances are in wanting, a lot

of things can happen and can go wrong. The findings clearly showed that the

Implementers preferences for the availability of instructional materials was directly

related to their educational preparations and are versatile in using these materials

depending on the needs and interests of the learners in a certain community. The

implementers knows that the learning center climate is one of the most treasured

assets to the teaching-learning situation. They work hard to maintain a healthy

climate, a learner friendly environment in the learning center. The perception of

learners on facilities and equipment, their implementers help them on the learning

sessions and provide instructional materials for the improvement of the lessons.

Both community and school have organic linkage as the school cannot be seen as
107

an independent institution out-of-the-way from the society in which it is located.

Community involvement is one of the major objective of the planning,

implementation and monitoring of ALS program. Several NGOs and LGUs have

also played active role in activities relating to strengthening and community

awareness activities for the out of school youth and adult. Stakeholders are

persons or organizations that have investments in the content of a program, or in

the dissemination and evaluation of a program. Over the last several years the

interpretation of stakeholder involvement has changed as programs have focused

not just on individuals and families, but the broader ecology including

neighborhood, workplace, schools, and places of worship, communities and the

society. Work in the area of teen pregnancy prevention, for example, as in the

general public health, social service and education fields, involves partnerships.

Consequently, decisions regarding programs should include the considerations

and perspectives of multiple stakeholders (Banach and Gregory, 2001).

Stakeholders include funders and administrators of programs, but also include

staff, program participants and their peers, family members, and the wider

community. It would not be unusual for stakeholders in a youth development

program to include elected city, county and state officials, religious leaders,

business owners, neighborhood association members, sports figures and

coaches, students, out-of-school youth, parents, health and social service

providers, educators, representatives of the art community, and any other

interested person or group. They should represent the diversity of the community

in many ways—race, ethnicity, ability, income, sexual orientation, family


108

constellation, etc. Youth development is the responsibility and a domain of interest

for all citizens in a community. Furthermore, the ALS program in Talisay City are

proficient in the implementation of the program in all aspects of concerns in the

communities like in instructional materials, physical facilities and equipment,

financial resources and linkages and cooperation from stakeholders. Hoy, Smith,

and Sweetland (2002) further explored this parsimonious view of climate creating

a new instrument called the Organizational Climate Index (OCI). They reduced the

95 - question survey from the previous study of Hoy, Hannum and Tschannen -

Moran (2008) into a 27 - item questionnaire. The items were taken from th e OHI

and the OCDQ and measured four essential features of school climate: the

relationship between the school and community (institutional vulnerability); the

relationship between the principal and teachers (collegial leadership); the

relationship among teachers (professional teacher behavior) ; and teacher,

parents, and principal press for achievement (achievement press). The OCI have

strong validity and demonstrated that collegial principal leadership is crucial in

developing faculty trust in school heads. Leaders who were open with teachers,

treating them as colleagues while setting reasonable standards were not only

respected by teachers but are rewarded with their trust. Faculty trust was also a

prominent component of healthy and open school climates. The most important

outcome of these studies are the different dimensions of school climate and

responsible for different trust relationships. Collegial leadership has strong links to

other climate factors such as organizational citizenship. Organizational citizenship

is voluntary and discretionary behavior of teachers that exceeds the formal


109

requirements of the job (Di Paola, Tarter, & Hoy, 2005). There is only a few

organizational properties that seem to make a difference in school achievement

beyond socioeconomic status: faculty trust in students and parents, collective

efficacy, academic emphasis, and organizational citizenship behavior. Faculty

trust in clients, collective efficacy, and academic emphasis are the factors that

combine to create academic optimism (DiPaola and Hoy, 2005). The age, income,

educational attainment, and gender of the respondents have no bearing on the

perceived level of implementation of ALS. In addition to the findings on the test of

relationship between the success of implementation to the profile of the

implementers, it was revealed that no relationship was established with regard to

the profile of the implementers and success of ALS implementation. On the ALS

best practices related as to the implementation of the program in Talisay City,

Cebu. The Implementers focus on the Increase learners attendance in

symposiums and activities to updates the learners on the current issues and trends

in the society, prioritize technical support from DepEd in the program of ALS for

the fully implementation of the program, participation of Talisay City Jail inmates

in ALS program to give them access in education, increase number of passers in

ALS A&E Test, positive views of learners towards education, community

cooperation on the affairs of the ALS programs and activities.

Conclusions

The success of the ALS program in developing personal and socio-

economic aspect of the learners has likewise been creditable. The ALS program

is an effective venue to lessen the out of school youth and adults in the country
110

and an effective ways to address unemployment issues in the country. The

implementation of ALS program in Talisay City, Cebu are commendable although

there are some areas that need enhancement like most of the ALS session held in

the barangay hall, make shift “payag-payag”, under the shade of a tree and

residence of a learner, there were no permanent learning centers for the

implementers and they need to move from one place to another where the

numbers of out-of-school youth and adult in the community are located but there

are also school heads provided classroom to our implementers for their sessions

inside the vicinity. However, issues and challenges were identified like: lack of

facilities to implement the learning experience, inadequate Instructional Materials

and Equipment, lack of ALS implementers and lack of Training and workshop for

the implementers. Among the issues are lack of teacher training, lack of teacher

strategies, lack of on the job training for the learners, and the lack of

sponsors/partners/linkages, lack of personality development, the lack of livelihood

Program to implement the learning experience, lack of modules/learning materials,

lack of livelihood program, and the lack of motivation from the learners. The

support from the parents and government officials or the cooperation from

stakeholder also play a big role in the ALS program for the security of the learners

and implementers in the community. Implementers plays a big role in the

implementation of ALS program in the community, the attitude of being humble,

patient and flexible must possessed by the Mobile Teachers and District

Coordinators in order to manage the different attitudes of their learners outside in

the formal school system. The implementers are given comprehensive seminars
111

about basic orientation and updates in ALS program. They are called “specialized”

teachers because they live among the people in remote barangay of the country

to conduct sessions. To give emphasis that the education of the out of school youth

must not only conform to the curriculum content but rather lack of funding in the

program per se.

Recommendations

The following recommendations are offered for related studies on the developing

a scheme of action for enhanced Alternative Learning System.

1. Provide opportunities for ALS Implementers to pursue their professional

growth through scholarship program and encourage them to undergo

further graduate study.

2. Strengthen partnership with the stakeholders and develop teacher

competencies in the implementation through seminars and workshop.

3. Supervisors and School Administrators must also aware the functions of

ALS Implementers to fully understand and appreciate the tasks and

achievements of the District ALS Coordinators and Mobile Teachers.

4. Development plan were created and implemented in the Department of

Education Alternative Learning System program to thoroughly identify

potential learners.

5. Disseminate ALS program and projects in the community.


112

Chapter 5

OUTPUT

Enhanced Development Plan

This output presents the Enhanced Alternative Learning System

Development Plan for ALS Implementers as basis for their personal, leadership,

research and functional improvement as leaders in the school and in the

community.

Rationale

The implementers are given comprehensive seminars about basic

orientation in ALS program, once they will hired as ALS teacher; Mobile Teachers

are “specialized” teachers who live among the people in remote barangay of the

country to conduct sessions for ALS, the District ALS Coordinators are primarily

designated to harmonize ALS initiatives in a district. Attitudes of an Implementers

are very important to understand the least, last and lost learner in the country.

All Mobile Teachers and District ALS Coordinators are entitled to receive

the teaching aid transportation allowance that shall be used to defray

transportation expense that they incur to reach all types of ALS learners in far-

flung areas and other types of barangays, the teaching aid allowance is intended

to purchase of supplies and/or reproduction of materials they will use in the

teaching-learning process. The Implementers are monitored and observed in their

community learning centers twice a month, they are required to submit

accomplishment report every month together with their daily time record and they

are also required to submit quarterly report.


113

The Talisay City Government allocate funds for ALS program operation like

training and seminars and special program related to ALS. The cooperation from

stakeholders are very important factors for the implementation of the ALS program.

There is a need to improve the performance concept of the stakeholders in ALS

program in order to align all indicators to the goals and objectives to the out-of-

school youth and adult to finish their education and can get a better job. The

Development plan is design to improve, effectiveness and efficiency the

Implementation of the ALS program in the DepEd Talisay City, considered the

areas of concern, strategies, time-frame, persons responsible, budget and

success indicator. This development plan must, identify potential learners and

increase public awareness on ALS programs and projects and to increase

participation rate through mapping and information drive, increase number of

Passers, strengthen partnership with community leaders, to improve ALS

Instruction through updates, monitoring, evaluation and research and developed

teachers’ competence in ALS Implementation.

In other words, it is the foundation for evaluating the internal potential and

limitations and the probable opportunities and threats from the external

environment. It views all positive and negative factors inside and outside the firm

that affect the success. Moreover, it was also suggested that a development plan

must be crafted that will address the deficient areas for improvement.
114

Enroll in College

Enter on the field of work


Implemententers
Learners
Promoted as Education
Elementary passers enroll in Junior High School Program Specialist II
Secondary passers enroll in Senior High School
Apply for promotion (Teacher
I,II,III,MT), Designated as District
Pass A&E Test ALS Coordinator

Apply for the position as ALS


Elementary Level
Implementers (Mobile Teacher )
Secondary level
Earned Bachelor’s Degree in
Education and pass the LET

A Career Pathing for ALS Implementers and Learners

Figure 4

Objectives of Scheme of Action for Enhanced Alternative Learning System

Development Plan

The Scheme of Action for Enhanced Alternative Learning System Development

Plan designed by the researcher aims to improve Implementation of ALS program.

Enhanced Alternative Learning System Development Plan is a path to a

greater responsibility and different type of roles for Implementers and

Stakeholders.

Enhanced Alternative Learning System Development Plan for

Implementers and Stakeholders aims to:


115

• immerse ALS Implementers to different trainings, workshop and

seminars that will enhance their personality and leadership skills;

• improve the performance of ALS Implementers by engaging them in

meaningful trainings, seminars and workshop;

• provide personal, leadership, functional and research plan for ALS

Implementers; and,

• educate and orient stakeholders by engaging them in seminars for

ALS program.

Scheme of Implementation

For the fulfillment of the Developing a Scheme of Action for Enhanced

Alternative Learning System, the development plan is provided. This will serve as

the guide for the improvement of ALS program Implementation in Talisay City

Division.

This will also to educate ALS implementers as to what is action research, how to

do an action research and why do action research.


116

eas of Objectives Strategies Persons Budget Source Time Actual


ncern Involved of Frame Expected Accompli
Budget Outcome shment
This section specifically Developed
Venue:
aims to: and
1.School 35,000.00
Division enhanced
Division Meals:
Educate MOOE Intra -nter
Superinte 55,000.00
Implementers Implement (Mainten personal
ndent Speakers:1
on Human ers will ance relationship
2.Assistan 0,000.00
Relations and undergo and of the
t Schools Training
its functions three(3) Other participants
Division Kits:
Develop Day Operatin
Superinte 10,000.00
Implementers Seminar in g
ndent Transportati
personal Capacity Expense 3 Days
3.Public on
onal relationship with Building: s )and
Schools Allowance:
colleagues, “Bridging /or
District 10,000.00
learners, Gaps in SEF(
Superviso Decoration:
parents, the Special
r 5,000.00
stakeholders Community Educatio
4.Educatio Other
and superiors Towards n Fund)
n Program Miscellaneo
Provide the
Superviso us
opportunity to Success of
r expenses:
solve gaps ALS”
5.ALS 10,000.00
encountered in
Implement Total
the community
ers Budget:125,
000.00
This section specifically Barangay 5,000.00 Division Developed
aims to: mapping 1.School MOOE the ALS
Advocate and ,interviews Division (Mainten Implementer
Social and enroll Superinte ance s leadership
Mobilization potential ndent and skills
Develop learners 2.Assistan 80,000.00 Other
learning t Schools Operatin Enhanced
materials in Reproduce Division g the learners
raising Advocacy Superinte Expense talents and
2
k awareness on materials ndent s )and skills
quarter
ALS programs training 3.Public /or
s
and projects facilitated Schools SEF( Involve the
implemented and District Special brgy officials
Develop Skills conducted Superviso 50,000.00 Educatio and sustain
training for the r n Fund) the ALS
learners 4.Educatio projects in
n Program the
Involve Conduct Superviso 20,000.00 community
Learners in different r
Activities Skills
117

training for 5.ALS


the Implement
learners ers
Establish 6.
functional e- Include Barangay 120,000.00
learning center ALS officials
learners in
different Total
activities( Budget:
Brigada 275,000.00
Eskwela,N
utrition
Month and
others)

Create and
Facilitate
Functional
e-Learning
Centers in
every
barangay
This section specifically 1.School computer,
aims to: Division digitized,
Identify the Superinte drawn to
Conduct
location of non- ndent Division scale literacy
Literacy
literate 2.Assistan MOOE maps
maps 6,000.00
members of the t Schools (Mainten Recruited
geograhica
community Division ance more
lly
Conduct Superinte and learners
illustrated
immersion in ndent Other
raising 3.Public Operatin
Immerse 25,000.00
awareness in Schools g
the
order to District Expense 1st
munity Implement
increase Superviso s )and quarter
ers in the Total
enrolment, r /or
community Budget :
completers and 4.Educatio SEF(
31,000.00
A&E passers n Program Special
Report and
Superviso Educatio
enroll
r n Fund)
learners
5.ALS
profile in
Implement
the MIS
ers
generated
6.
Barangay
officials
118
119

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books

Cheng, Yin Cheong. (2003). Profiles of Organizational Culture and Effective


Schools: School Effectiveness and Improvement

Deal, Terrence E. (2003). The Culture of Schools. In Educational Leadership and


School Culture, edited by Marshall Sashkin and Herbert J. Walberg.
Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing,.

Deal, Terrence E. and Kent D. Peterson. (2000). The Principal's Role in Shaping
School Culture. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and
Improvement. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Carlton, Lawrence W., Ed.D. (2009).Illinois High School Principals’ Perception of


Alternative Learning Environments. Illinois State University.

Demarest, E.J., Reisner, E.R., Anderson, L.M., Humphrey, D.C., Farquhar, E., &
Stein, S.E. (2003). Review of Researcch On Achieving the Nation’s
Readiness Goal, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Furtwengler, Willis J., and Anita Micich. (2001). Seeing What We Think: Symbols
of School Culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (2001). Open schools/healthy schools:
Measuring organizational climate. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Fyans, Leslie J., Jr., and Martin L. Maehr. (2000). School Culture, Student
Ethnicity, and Motivation. Urbana, Illinois: The National Center for School
Leadership.

Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2007). The Road to Open and Healthy Schools: A
handbook for change, Elementary Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press.

Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2006). Academic Optimism of
Schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research
Journal.

Keefe, James W. (2003).Leadership for School Restructuring-Redesigning Your


School. High School Magazine.
120

McGuigan, L. & Hoy, W. K. (2006). Principal Leadership: Creating a Culture of


Academic Optimism to Improve Achievement for All Students. Leadership
and Policy in Schools.

Rosenholtz, S.J. (2001). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools.


New York: Teachers College Press.

Senge, Peter M. (2000).The Leader's New Work:Building Learning Organizations.

Thacker, Jerry L., and William D. McInerney. (2002). Changing Academic Culture
To Improve Student Achievement in the Elementary Schools.
Wolters, Andrea, Ed.D.(2008). Alternative Learning Program: Students
Perceptions. Wilmington University.

Journals

Bevans K, Bradshaw C, Miech R, Leaf P. ( 2007). Staff- and School-Level


Predictors of Public School Culture: A Multilevel Analysis.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Framework for Program
Evaluation in Public Health. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Fullan, Michael G. (2002). Visions That Blind. Educational Keadership.

Geertz, Clifford. (2003). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Stolp, Stephen, and Stuart C. Smith.(2004). School Culture and Climate: The Role
of the Leader, Oregon School Study Council.

Pearl Subban , Pearl and Dr. Umesh Sharma. ( 2005). Understanding Educator
Attitudes Toward the Implementation of Inclusive Education. Subban
Disability Studies Quarterly Society for Disability Studies.

Smith, P. A. & Hoy, W. K. (2007). Academic Optimism and Student Achievement


in Urban Elementary Schools. Journal of Educational Administration.

Memoranda

Depedro7.com.ph/.../ALS%20role%20in%20 EFA%202015.pdf on October 20,

2012

DepED Order No.77,s.(2012) amended guidelines for the alternative learning(als)

unified contracting scheme on November 9, 2012.


121

DepEd Memorandum No. 443 s. (2007). Unified Guidelines for the Alternative

Learning System (ALS) Contracting Scheme.

DepEd memorandum No. 443,s. (2007). Unified Guidelines for the Alternative

learning System(ALS) Contracting Scheme. On November 11, 2012.

DepEd Memorandum No. 313,s. (2008). Guidelines on the Disbursement and

utilization of incentives and extra Allowances for ALS Mobile Teachers and

Districts ALS Coordinators.Department of Education. Bureau of

Alternative Learning System on November 12, 2012.

Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.,President of the Philippines. Executive Order No. 356-

Renaiming the Bureau of Non- Formal Education to Bureau of Alternative

Learning System. Malacañang, Manila.

Dissertation

Yango, Divina. (2008). Best Practices in Implementing the Alternative Learning


System. Dissertation, Baguio City.

Internet Sources

Banach, M., & Gregory, P.J. (2001). Essential tasks, skills, and decisions for
developing sustainable community-based programs for children, youth,
and families at risk. Journal of Extension, 39(5)
[URL:http://www.joe.org/joe/2001october/a4.html].

Butler, J.A. & Dickson, K.M. (2004).Improving school culture: Centennial high
School. Northwest Regional Laboratory. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from
the World Wide Web: http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/517
A look at effective school practices.

Boyd, V. (2002). The school culture. School Context: Bridge or Barrier? Southwest
Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from the
World Wide Web: http://www.sedl.org/change/school/culture.html
A look at the impact of school culture.
122

Department of Education.(Office of the Secretary) Press Release.OSEC


Communications. DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue Pasig City 1600:
depedcommunications@gmail.com

Kilian, C. (2009). The Two Sides of the School Culture Coin.TECHNOS Quarterly,
Retrieved January 16, 2017, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.ait.net/technos/tq_08/3kilian.php

Mayeske, G.W., & Lambur, M.T. (2001). How to design better programs: A Staff-
Centered Stakeholder Approach to Program Logic Modeling. Journal of
Extension. [URL:How to Design Better Programs: A Staff-Centered
Stakeholder Approach to Program Logic Modeling .

McDonald,Emma.(2012).SettingExpectations.http://www.inspiringteachers.co
m/classroommanagementdiscipline/setting_expectations.html, retrieved
January 16, 2017

Stolp, S. (2004). Leadership for School Culture. ERIC Digest 91. Retrieved
January 16, 2002, from the World Wide Web:
http://eric.uoregon.edu/publications/digests/digest091.html. A description
of the importance of a positive school culture and how leadership can
affect school culture.

Student Motivation to Learn is a product of the ERIC (Educational Resources


Information Center) Clearinghouse on Educational Management at the
College of Education, University of
Oregon http://eric.uoregon.edu/pdf/digests/digest092.pdf

Crnic, K., & Lamberty G. (1994, April). Reconsidering school readiness:


Conceptual and applied perspectives. Early Education and Development
5(2), 99-105. Available
online:http://readyweb.crc.uiuc.edu/library/1994/crnic1.html

Edited by Lourdes Diaz Soto. (2007).The Praeger Handbook of Latino Education


intheU.Shttp://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/earlycld/ea7refer.
htm retrieved 13 January 2017
Richard Lee (2012). Time to focus on youth and adult education
http://www.osisa.org/open-learning/education/regional/time-focus-youth-
and-adult-education
Sereima Lumelume. The University of the South Pacific Institute of
Educationhttp://www.unesco.org/uil/litbase/?menu=4&programme=32

Plan International (ALL ABOARD THE MUMBAI SCHOOL BUS


INDIAMARGINALISED CHILDRENEDUCATION (2015)https://plan-
international.org/news/2015-08-27-all-aboard-mumbai-school-bus#
123

http://www.deped.gov.ph/als/programs

DepED.gov.ph on November 9, 2012.

Republic Act 9155 also known as Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001.
124

APPENDIX A

TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT

___________
DR.LEAH P.NOVERAS
Schools Division Superintendent
DepEd,Talisay City Division
Talisay City, Cebu

Dear Madame:

The undersigned is currently finishing his dissertation for Doctor in


Development Education at the Graduate School of Cebu Technological University,
Cebu City. In compliance with the degree, the undersigned is presently working on
his dissertation titled “THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALTERNATIVE
LEARNING SYSTEM IN THE DIVISION OF TALISAY CITY.”

In this connection, he would like to seek permission from your good office
to allow me to gather data and to interview the ALS Implementers and learners.

Rest assured that your responses will be treated with utmost respect and
confidentiality.

Thank you.

Respectfully yours,

ALFONSO C. ABASOLO JR.


Researcher

Approved:

LEAH P. NOVERAS, Ed.D.,CESO VI


Schools Division Superintendent
125

Appendix B

TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO THE ADVISER

DR. MARILYN M. MIRANDA


Education Program Supervisor
DepEd,Regional Office
Sudlon,Lahug,Cebu City

Dear Madame:

The undersigned is currently finishing his dissertation for Doctor in


Development Education at the Graduate School of Cebu Technological University,
Cebu City. In compliance with the degree, the undersigned is presently working on
his dissertation titled “THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALTERNATIVE
LEARNING SYSTEM IN THE DIVISION OF TALISAY CITY”.

In this connection, the undersigned would like to ask your approval to be


the adviser of the undersigned.

Thank you.

Respectfully yours,

ALFONSO C. ABASOLO JR.


Researcher

Noted:

REBECCA DC. MANALASTAS,Ed.D.,PH.D


Dean, Graduate School

Approved:
MARILYN M. MIRANDA, Ed.D
Education Program Supervisor
126

Appendix C

Part 1. Teachers Profile

Name :__________________________________________
(Family Name, First Name Middle Name)
Age :_______
Gender (pls check) : Male Female Status : MT DALSC SALC
Highest Educational Attainment :__________________________
Years of experience as ALS Implementor :__________
Training and Seminars :
Title: _____________________________________Year:_________

_____________________________________ __________
_____________________________________ __________
_____________________________________ __________

Part II.

Excellent Good Fair Poor

A.INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS (4) (3) (2) (1)

1. Adequacy of Visual Aids in ALS Classes

2. Integrate on the use of media in the


delivery of the lesson to various subjects

3.Quality Instructional Materials available


during ALS sessions

4. Appropriateness of instructional materials


to ALS learner

5. Relevance of instructional materials use


during ALS session

B.FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT

1. Facilities and equipment for ALS are


always available.

2. Suitable facilities for ALS instruction

3. Enough of materials and facilitates for ALS


127

4. Relevance of ALS Facilities

5.Appropriateness of available equipment

6. Relevance of learning center instructional


materials

7. Quality of learning center resources for


ALS

8. Appropriate of learning instructional


resources

9. Accessibility and safety of ALS learning


center materials

10. Availability of learning center materials

C.FINANCIAL RESOURCES

1. Provided Funds for overall ALS program


implementation

2. Immediate release of funds for ALS

3. Appropriation of ALS Projects

4. Availability of fund for special program

5. Sufficiency of fund for salaries and


personal services

D.COOPERATION FROM
STAKEHOLDERS

1.Attendance in Meetings and Planning

Session

2. Attendance and participation in ALS


activities

3. Involvement of Parents, Teachers and


government officials

4. Moral support in ALS activities


128

5. Provision of Constructive Feedback

E. ATTITUDE OF ALS IMPLEMENTERS

1.Dedication and Passion

2.Leadership potential

3.Knowledge of ALS curriculum

4.Teaching-Learning management

5.Relationship with both internal and external


stakeholders
129

Appendix D

Part 1. Learners Profile

Name : __________________________________________
(Family Name, First Name Middle Name)
Age : _______
Gender (pls check) : Male Female
Highest Educational Attainment: __________________________
Family Income: __________
Reason for not attending school:

___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________

Part II.

Excellent Good Fair Poor

(4) (3) (2) (1)


INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

1. Adequacy of Visual Aids used in ALS


Classes

2. Adequacy of Institutional Media for various


subjects

3. Quality of Instructional Materials in ALS

4. Relevance and acceptability of


instructional materials to ALS materials
learner

5. Appropriateness of instructional materials

FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT

1. Facilities and equipment for ALS are


always available.

2. Quality of facilities for ALS instruction

3. Adequacy of materials and facilitates for


ALS
130

4. Relevance of ALS Facilities

5.Appropriateness of available equipment

6. Relevance of learning center instructional


materials

7. Quality of learning center resources for


ALS

8. Appropriate of learning instructional


resources

9. Accessibility and safety of ALS learning


center materials

10. Availability of learning center materials

ATTITUDE OF ALS TEACHERS

1.Promptness and punctuality of teachers

2.Effectiveness in instructional delivery

3.Counseling and follow-up of ALS Learners

4.Communication and Feed backing with


ALS Learners
131

Appendix E
Teachers Self-rating in Instructional Materials

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1. Adequacy of Visual Aids in ALS 9 75 3 25 0 0 0 0 Excellent


Classes

2. Integrate on the use of media in the 3 25 8 66.66 1 8.33 0 0 Good


delivery of the lesson to various
subjects

3.Quality Instructional Materials available 2 16.66 9 75 1 8.33 0 0 Good


during ALS sessions

4. Appropriateness of instructional 8 66.66 4 33.33 0 0 0 0 Excellent


materials to ALS learner

5. Relevance of instructional materials 8 66.66 3 25 1 8.33 0 0 Excellent


use during ALS session

Rubrics :

4 - 76%-100%- Utilizes complete set of modules, use laptop, LCD projector, printer with visual
aids in the learning center

3 - 51%-75% Utilizes complete set of modules, use laptop, LCD projector, printer

2 - 26%-50% Utilizes complete set of modules,

1 - 0% - 25 % Utilizes not complete set of modules

Legend: Int-Interpretation
132

Appendix F

Teachers Self-rating on Facilities and Equipment

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1. Facilities and equipment for ALS are 6 50 4 33.33 2 16.66 0 0 Excellent


always available.

2. Suitable facilities for ALS instruction 4 33.33 6 50 2 16.66 0 0 Good

3. Enough of materials and facilitates for 3 25 8 66.66 1 8.33 0 0 Good


ALS

4. Relevance of ALS Facilities 2 16.66 9 75 1 8.33 0 0 Good

5.Appropriateness of available 6 50 4 33.33 2 16.66 0 0 Excellent


equipment

6. Relevance of learning center 5 41.66 6 50 1 8.33 0 0 Good


instructional materials

7. Quality of learning center resources 5 41.66 6 50 1 8.33 0 0 Good


for ALS

8. Appropriate of learning instructional 3 25 8 66.66 1 8.33 0 0 Good


resources

9. Accessibility and safety of ALS 8 66.66 2 16.66 2 16.66 0 0 Excellent


learning center materials

10. Availability of learning center 6 50 4 33.33 2 16.66 0 0 Excellent


materials
133

Appendix G

Teachers Self-rating on Financial Resources

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1. Provided Funds for overall ALS 7 58.33 3 25 2 16.66 0 0 Excellent


program implementation

2. Immediate release of funds for ALS 6 50 4 33.33 2 16.66 0 0 Excellent

3. Appropriation of ALS Projects 9 75 2 16.66 1 8.33 0 0 Excellent

4. Availability of fund for special program 10 83.33 2 16.66 0 0 0 0 Excellent

5. Sufficiency of fund for salaries and 5 41.66 4 33.33 2 16.66 1 8.33 Excellent
personal services

Appendix H

Teachers Self-rating on Cooperation from stakeholders

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1.Attendance in Meetings and Planning 0 0 2 16.66 8 66.66 2 16.66 Fair

Session
2. Attendance and participation in ALS 0 0 7 58.33 2 16.66 3 25 Good
activities

3. Involvement of Parents, Teachers and 0 0 0 0 4 33.33 8 66.66 Poor


government officials

4. Moral support in ALS activities 0 0 3 25 5 41.66 4 33.33 fair

5. Provision of Constructive Feedback 0 0 3 25 6 50 3 25 Fair

Legend: Int-Interpretation
134

Appendix C8
Attitude of ALS Implementers

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int


(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1. Dedication and Passion 9 75 3 25 0 0 0 0 Excellent

2.Leadership potential 10 83.33 2 16.66 0 0 0 0 Excellent

3.Knowledge of ALS curriculum 11 91.66 1 8.33 0 0 0 0 Excellent

4.Teaching-learning management 5 41.66 7 58.33 0 0 0 0 Good


skills/strategies

5.Relationship with both internal and 3 25 5 41.66 4 33.33 0 0 Good


external stakeholders

Legend: Int-Interpretation

Rubrics:
Teaching-learning management
Dedication and Passion skills/strategies

a. Regularly monitor and supervise a. Competent in feed backing


b. Sensitive to the needs of the ALS learners
c. Provide technical Assistance b. Provide technical assistance on
improving teaching learning process
Leadership potential c. Recommend appropriate
interventions
a. Management of the program
b. Share Innovative ideas Relationship with both internal and
c. Respect ones ideas external stakeholders
Knowledge of ALS curriculum
a. Communicating the ALS program
a. Familiar with the ALS Curriculum
b. Listening to the voice of the
b. Provide Technical Assistance on the stakeholders
alignment of k 12 Curriculum
c. Implement the ALS Curriculum c. Recognize the stakeholders
efforts

4- Observed three indicators 3- Observed two indicators 2- Observed one indicator

1- Indicators does not observed


135

Appendix I

Learners Self-rating on Instructional Materials

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1. Adequacy of Visual Aids used in 72 38.70 92 49.46 20 10.75 2 1.07 Good


ALS Classes

2. Adequacy of Institutional Media for 47 25.26 126 67.74 8 4.30 5 2.68 Good
various subjects

3. Quality of Instructional Materials in 65 34.94 120 64.51 1 .53 0 0 Good


ALS

4. Relevance and acceptability of 84 45.16 89 47.84 13 6.98 0 0 Good


instructional materials to ALS
materials learner

5. Appropriateness of instructional 71 38.17 98 52.68 17 9.13 0 0 Good


materials

Rubrics :

4 - 76%-100%- Utilizes complete set of modules, use laptop, LCD projector, printer with visual
aids in the learning center

3 - 51%-75% Utilizes complete set of modules, use laptop, LCD projector, printer

2 - 26%-50% Utilizes complete set of modules,

1 - 0% - 25 % Utilizes not complete set of modules

Legend: Int-Interpretation
136

Appendix J

Learners Self-rating on Facilities and Equipment

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1. Facilities and equipment for ALS 74 39.78 97 52.15 15 8.06 0 0 Good


are always available.

2. Quality of facilities for ALS 61 32.79 116 62.36 9 4.83 0 0 Good


instruction

3. Adequacy of materials and 51 27.41 124 66.66 11 5.91 0 0 Good


facilitates for ALS

4. Relevance of ALS Facilities 45 24.19 110 59.13 17 9.13 14 7.52 Good

5.Appropriateness of available 59 31.72 108 58.06 19 10.21 0 0 Good


equipment

6. Relevance of learning center 64 34.40 98 52.68 24 12.90 0 0 Good


instructional materials

7. Quality of learning center resources 48 25.80 125 67.20 13 6.98 0 0 Good


for ALS

8. Appropriate of learning instructional 49 26.34 113 60.75 18 9.67 6 3.22 Good


resources

9. Accessibility and safety of ALS 71 38.17 109 58.60 0 0 6 3.22 Good


learning center materials

10. Availability of learning center 68 36.55 99 53.22 19 10.21 0 0 Good


materials
137

Appendix K

Learners Self-rating on Financial Resources

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1. Provided Funds for overall ALS 74 39.78 97 52.15 15 8.06 0 0 Good


program implementation

2. Immediate release of funds for ALS 64 34.40 98 52.68 24 12.90 0 0 Good

3. Appropriation of ALS Projects 45 24.19 110 59.13 17 9.13 14 7.52 Good

4. Availability of fund for special program 49 26.34 113 60.75 18 9.67 6 3.22 Good

5. Sufficiency of fund and personal 59 31.72 108 58.06 19 10.21 0 0 Good


services

Appendix L

Learners Self-rating on Cooperation from stakeholders

Excellent Good Fair Poor Int

(4) (3) (2) (1)

f % f % f % f %

1.Attendance in Meetings and Planning 18 9.67 11 60.75 49 26.34 6 3.22 Good


3
Session
2. Attendance and participation in ALS 51 27.41 12 66.66 11 5.91 0 0 Good
activities 4

3. Involvement of Parents, Teachers and 13 6.98 48 25.80 125 67.20 0 0 Good


government officials

4. Moral support in ALS activities 19 10.21 68 36.55 99 53.22 0 0 Good

5. Provision of Constructive Feedback 24 12.90 64 34.40 98 52.68 0 0

Legend: Int-Interpretation
138

Success Story

A success story of an ALS Learner in Talisay City Division and submitted

by the researcher to the DepEd Central office and published in the DepED

Official Gazette with the permission of Mr. Jamon.

The story of Bernard: A life full of failures, challenges and hope


“ALS gives light to those who are lost like me.” – Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon
“I am really thankful to the ALS program. It gave me another chance to prove that I can
succeed. I hope that the Department of Education through ALS would continue to
search for the lost out of school youths and adults.” – Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon
“I hope that the government would continue to enhance ALS program.” – Bernard
Evangelicom V. Jamon

Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon left home at the age of ten and became an out of school
youth; he just finished Grade V at that time. After five years of stopping going to school,
at the age of 15, he transferred in Cebu; there he took the ALS. He is now a high school
teacher, college instructor, and lecturer for the Licensure Examination Test for Teachers
(LET).

Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon was born in Valenzuela, Metro Manila on February


21, 1992. His parents are Evangeline V. Jamon and Bernabe P. Jamon. He has three
siblings; namely, Bernard Evan, Bernie Emmanuel, and Berna Evangelli. He was second
among the four.
Bernard as a young boy showed no interest in education. He used to cut classes and
often told his mother that he did not like to go to school. Though he did not like
schooling because he considered it boring, he excelled in his classes; there is no school
year that he did not receive an award or recognition. As the years go by, Bernard fully
lost his appetite in education. He decided to stop going to school, but her mother
insisted that he should be educated but he was too stubborn to follow her. He
continued to cut classes and if he was in class, he would always create trouble. One day
his mother became tired of him, she asked him to leave their house. Bernard did not
hesitate, he thought that he could stand by himself. He left home at the age of ten (10)
nowhere to go. He was too young then to survive, but he was too proud to be stopped
by anyone. On his first nights on the street, he slept at the pavement, took a bath in a
carwash station, and used to borrow shirts from the carwash boys in exchange for their
errands.
As he went on with his life without any guardian and wanderer, he did his best in
order to survive. He worked as a fruit vendor in Dagonoy Public Market in Manila. He
also learned to huddle fruits and vegetables in Divisoria to have something to sell in the
market. He used to go to Divisoria in the evening to huddle, then sell the fruits and
139

vegetables in whole sale to the vendors in the market and after he would go to the
Philippine National Railway to sell tickets in Vito Cruz Station.
Since he had no guardian, he was greatly influenced by his peers. He learned the
language of the street. He met different kinds of people. He joined gangs, engaged in
gambling (all types of gambling), and he became drug dependent. At the age of 13, he
already knew how to drink liquor and smoke. He also became involved in fraternity
wars. He also used to transfer from one place to another just to find a living. He lived
in Manila, Makati, Pangasinan, and Laguna. He transferred in those places because
someone invited him to work there.
The turning point of his life was when he got sick, probably because of his vices and
work. He told me that he would just sleep for two hours a day, because he had to work
in the morning and play tongits in the evening until dawn, and he would do it almost
everyday. So, the age of fourteen (14) he suffered from over fatigue and diagnosed
with ulcer. Due to his illness, he became bedridden for at least three months. He could
hardly stand due to the pain in his stomach. That made him incapable of working. He
just relied from the contribution of his neighbors and some friends to continuously
survive. He really felt miserable. He even wished that he would die because he felt that
he could not stand anymore the pain.
After few months of suffering, his parents and aunt in Cebu learned his condition
from some unknown people. Probably his friends tried to find some of his relatives and
his relatives after knowing his condition reported to his mother and aunt his situation.
At that time, he was residing in Cabuyao, Laguna. His aunt was first to help him. She
sent money to him for his medication. Then his mother brought him back to their
house. There his condition started to get better.
After few weeks, his mother offered to help him by sending back to school, but he
again refused. But another offer came; it was from his aunt, the one who helped him.
His aunt offered him to live with her in Cebu. She promised that she would send him to
school and gave him a better life. He was first hesitant but later on agreed.
In 2007, he went to Cebu for another opportunity. He was 15 years old. His aunt told
him that there is an Alternative Learning System (ALS) that helps the out of school youth
an opportunity to be educated in a special way. He hesitantly decided to enroll in ALS
under the Mr. Alinsonorin and Mrs. Valde. They helped him by giving him modules and
teaching him regularly. They also kept on encouraging him to be a better person.
In 2008, he took the A&E Test, and fortunately he passed the test. That test made
him eligible to be enrolled in college. And on that year, he enrolled college and took-up
education course at St. Cecilia’s College. He studied well because he knew that he was
behind from his classmates because they have undergone formal education. He spent
most of his vacant time in the library studying and asking his classmates about the
things he did not know. He was also befriended by his professors due to his diligence.
And semester after semester, he was part of the Dean’s List.
After four years, he graduated college With Honors obtaining the General Weighted
Average of 1.32 equivalent for Magna Cum laude. He took the Licensure Examination
Test for teacher in the same year and passed it. And in the same year, he was hired at
the Department of Education as Teacher Aid Volunteer. After a year, he was hired by
140

the DepEd as regular permanent teacher. He was also hired as a part-time faculty
member of Talisay City College and he is serving the college until today. He also taught
at the Graduate School of Cebu Technological University. He is also currently a guest
lecturer of GeenEd CTRC for the Licensure Examination Test for Teachers (LET). He has
written various workbooks and modules, and invited to lecture in various topics in
education.
Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon already finished his Master’s Degree in Education and
now finished the Academic Requirements for the degree of Doctor in Education. He is
hoping that he could finish his Doctorate Degree in 2017.
His life is just like roller coaster ride, but he proved that it is never too late to succeed.
He said in an optimistic gesture, “I want my life, not to be remembered as a miserable
life; I want it to be remembered as a life full of failures, challenges, and hope.” He hopes
that his life would be an inspiration to those who are lost.
His life is truly an inspiration, not just to us, his colleagues at the Division of Talisay
but also to the out of school youth out there that it is not too late to change for the
better.
We salute him! His success story is worth sharing.

Barangay Poblacion, Talisay City, Cebu


Alfonso Abasolo Jr.
0933-389-2443/09163626693
Education Program Specialist in ALS, Talisay City Division
He was the classmate in the Doctorate studies and a good friend of Mr. Bernard
Evangelicom V. Jamon
Bernard Evangelicom V. Jamon (Contact Number: 0923-117-5704 or email him at
jamonbernardevangelicom@yahoo.com)
141

CURRICULUM VITAE

ALFONSO C. ABASOLO JR.

Inayawan,Cebu City

Mobile No.09333892443

Email:alfonsoaxel@yahoo.com

PERSONAL DATA

Date of Birth : June 30, 1970

Gender : Male

Place of Birth : Cebu City

Citizenship : Filipino

Civil Status : Married

Spouse : Ma. Ernestine Alcantara Abasolo

Children : Juliene Luissa A.Abasolo

: Jules Lorenz A. Abasolo

: Justine Louise A. Abasolo

Religion : Roman Catholic


142

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Graduate Studies : Doctor in Development Education

Cebu Technological University-Main Campus

M.J. Cuenco Ave., Cor. R. Palma St., 6000 Cebu

March 2017

:Master of Arts in Teaching (MAT)

Major in Alternative Learning System

University of Visayas

March 2013

Vocational : Comprehensive Live-In Caregiver Program

TESDA-NC II

ABQ, Talisay City, Cebu, 2008

Tertiary : Bachelor of Science in Medical Technology

Southwestern University, Cebu City

October 1991

Certificate of Professional Education

: Cebu Normal University

Cebu City, 2008

Secondary : Holy Rosary School

Cebu City, 1987

Elementary : Inayawan Elementary School

: Inayawan, Cebu City, 1983


143

TEACHING EXPERIENCE

= Education Program Specialist

2015-Present

DepEd Talisay City

Poblacion, Talisay City, Cebu

=District ALS Coordinator

2008-2015

DepEd Talisay City

Poblacion, Talisay City, Cebu

=Mobile Teacher

2004-2008

DepEd Talisay City

Poblacion, Talisay City, Cebu

=Classroom Teacher

2002-2004

Laray Elementary School

San Roque,Talisay City Cebu

=Teacher Aide Volunteer

Tapul Elementary School

Jaclupan Elementary School

Tabunoc Central Elementary School

TRAININGS AND SEMINARS

 Orientation-Seminar for ALS Coordinators/Facilitators in Handling Learners


with Psycho-Social and Emotional Challenges( Children in Conflict with the
Law)
Mibang Hotel,Dipolog City, February 21-24,2017,DepEd
144

 Dualtech 101 Work-life Effectiveness Seminar –Workshop


Canlubang, Laguna City, November 16-17,2016,DepEd DualTech

 Community Caravan Activities ALS


Surigao City, November 14-16, 2016,DepEd

 Field Validation of the Inclusive Education Policy Framework


Deped, Lahug Cebu City, November 8-10, 2016, DepEd

 Consultative Conference on the Implementation of ALS


Deped, Lahug, Cebu City, October 26-28, 2016, DepEd

 Finalization of ALS Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)Forms


Fortuna Hotel, Cebu City,October 10-14,2016, DepEd

 2016 Reg.ALS and Teachers day celebration


DepEd Lahug Cebu City, September 30,2016,DepEd

 Mid Year Review and Planning for Human Resource Training and Development
Cebu City, August 23,2016, DepEd

 Reg.ALS,Abot Alam,Indigenous People Education Conference/Monitoring


Valencia Negros Oriental,July 5-8,2016,DepEd

 Regional Madrasah Focal Persons Conference


Deped Lahug Cebu City, August 4-5, 2016, DepEd

 Regional In Service Training of Arabic Language Islamic values


ANC Banilad,Cebu City,May 14-18,2016,DepEd

 Capacity Building Workshop for Regional and Division


Cebu City, April 25-29,2016, DepEd

 HIV and Aids Educ. Prevention in the workplace(Speaker)


Talisay City Division,July 26,2013,DepEd

 Hope "Child Protection System Training


Laray Elementary School,October 24,2013,Hope
145

 Training of Trainors on HIV and AIDS Educ. Prevention In The Work Place
Ecotech Lahug, Cebu City, August 8-10,2012,DepEd HNC PNAC

 Training on Survival Skills ( ALS Fear Factor ) for District ALS Coordinator and
Core Trainors
Davao City,January 17-20,2011,DepEd BALS

 Orientation on the Registration for the August 2010 ALS Accreditation &
Equivalency Test
Lahug Cebu City ,April 29,2010,DepEd BALS

 Training for Alternative Learning System e-learning Centers Facilitators


UP Diliman Quezon City,September 22-25,2009,DepEd BALS

 ALS Alumni Homecoming and Recognition of Achievers


Teachers Camp Baguio City, August 18-20 ,2009, DepEd BALS

 Basic course on alternative learning system for district als coordinators


ECOTECH Lahug, Cebu City,February 12-14,2008, DepEd BALS

You might also like