Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Production flow analysis (PFA) is a method for identifying part families and
associated machine groupings that uses the information contained on process plans
rather than on part drawings.
• Work parts with identical or similar process plans are classified into part families.
These families can then be used to form logical machine cells in a group technology
layout.
• The procedure in production flow analysis must begin by defining the scope of the
study, which means deciding on the population of parts to be analyzed.
The procedure of Production flow analysis (PFA) consists of the following steps:
1. Data Collection. The minimum data needed in the analysis are the part number
and operation sequence, which is obtained from process plans.
2. Sortation of process plans. A sortation procedure is used to group parts with
identical process plans.
3. PFA Chart. The processes used for each group are then displayed in a PFA chart
as shown below.
4. Clustering Analysis. From the pattern of data in the PFA chart, related groupings
are identified and rearranged into a new pattern that brings together groups with
similar machine sequences.
3. Computer vision/Machine vision system:
3. Interpretation:
For a given application, the image must be interpreted based on extracted features
Concerned with recognizing the object, called pattern recognition - common
techniques:
a) Template matching – compares one or more features of the image object with
a template (model) stored in memory
b) Feature weighting – combines several features into one measure by weighting
each feature according to its relative importance in identifying the object
4. Integration of CAQC with CAD/CAM
When we talk about automated inspection, we are usually referring to in-line 100%
inspection as opposed to off-line measurement room inspection. There are scenarios
that may be considered as automated off-line such as a programmable CMM.
Whether dedicated inspection stations or process stations with inspection capabilities
there are clear advantages to automated 100% inspection over off-line sampling.
Labor savings and timeliness of detecting a process breakdown or product defect are
three examples.
Another aspect of in-line automated inspection is that it is predominantly non-contact
to avoid wear. Sensor technologies described as laser triangulation, capacitive,
magnetic, eddy current, and 2D and 3D vision have all proven themselves in countless
applications.
Key Decisions
As an example, with automated inspection some critical system life cycle level decisions
include:
The demand for end items is scheduled over a number of time periods and recorded
on a master production schedule (MPS). The master production schedule expresses
how much of each item is wanted and when it is wanted. The MPS is developed from
forecasts and firm customer orders for end items, safety stock requirements, internal
orders. MRP takes the master schedule for end items and translates it into individual
time-phased component requirements.
The product structure records also known as bill of material records(BOM), contain
information on every item or assembly required to produce end items. Information on
each item, such as part number, description, quantity per assembly, next higher
assembly, lead times, and quantity per end item, must be available.
The inventory status records contain the status of all items in inventory, including on
hand inventory and scheduled receipts. These records must be kept up to date, with
each receipt, disbursement, or withdrawal documented to maintain record integrity.
MRP will determine from the master production schedule and the product
structure records the gross component requirements; the gross component
requirements will be reduced by the available inventory as indicated in the
inventory status records.