Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mathematics Extension 2
SOLUTIONS
Disclaimer: These solutions may contain small errors. If any are found, please feel free to
contact either Carrotsticks or Trebla on www.boredofstudies.org, regarding them.
Thanks: To Trebla, for his many hours spent verifying solutions and suggesting alternate
methods.
Multiple Choice
1. A
2. A
3. D
4. C
5. C
6. B
7. B
8. D
9. A
10. A
Brief Explanations
Question 1 Definition of ellipse.
Question 2 Vector must be longer, since we have the reciprocal of a vector that has
modulus less than 1. The arguments must also be subtracted, since we are dividing two
vectors.
Question 6 Standard resolution of forces. Note that F points upwards since V is less than
the optimal speed.
Question 10 Use the Conjugate Root Theorem to factorise, then the discriminant.
–1–
Written Response
Question 11 (a)
ln e e
x x
0
ee 1
ln
11
e2 1
ln
2e
But recall that sin 2 x cos2 x 1 , so we therefore have, by equating the numerator:
So therefore, we have:
1 1
A x B x cos x A x B x sin x
3 2
11 1 1
A x cos x sin x 2 cos x 3 sin x
23 2 12
Similarly:
11 1 1
B x cos x sin x 2 cos x 3 sin x
23 2 12
–2–
Question 11 (b) (ii)
–3–
Question 11 (c) (i)
R
r
Vn R 2 r 2 x x n
1 x x 1 x x x
2 2 n
1 x 2 1 x x x 1 x
2 2 2
x x
n
2 1 x x x x x
2 n
2 1 x x x n x
2 x x n x 2 x n 1 x
2 x x 2 x n x n 1 x
–4–
Question 11 (c) (ii)
1
lim Vn 2
n 6
3
Since 0 x 1 , we have 0 y 1 . We know that as n gets large, the curve y x n gets lower,
in the domain 0 x 1 .
Hence we see that if n gets large, then the area between the two curves will approach a right-
angled triangle (the lone curve on the right, in the above diagram, is y x 200 ).
So if we rotate this ‘triangle’ about the line x 1 , we will acquire a cone with unit base
radius, and unit height.
1
Using the formula Vcone r 2 h , where r 1 and h 1 , we indeed acquire Vcone .
3 3
–5–
Question 11 (d)
–6–
Question 12 (a) (i)
x y c
1 y
0
2 x 2 y
1 y
0
x y
y 1
y x
y
y
x
y
x
–7–
Question 12 (a) (ii)
y1
y y1 x x1
x1
y1
y1 a x1
x1
1
y1 a x1
x1
a x1 x1 y1
a x1 y1 x1
x1 x1 y1
x1 c
y1
b y1 x1
x1
x1 y1
b x1 y1 y1
y1 x1 y1
y1 c
a b x1 c y1 c
c x1 y1
c c
c
–8–
Alternatively
y1
y y1 x x1
x1
y1
y1 a x1
x1
a x1
y1
x1
x1 y1 a x1 1
Similarly, it passes through 0,b :
y1
b y1 x1
x1
b y1 x1 y1 2
Add the two equations:
2 x1 y1 a b x1 y1
a b x1 y1
a b x1 2 x1 y1 y1
x
2
1 y1
c
2
c
–9–
Question 12 (b)
mg
r 2 r
Divide the two expressions to acquire tan 2 . But we also know that tan 2 ,
g R h1
using the right-angled triangle. Equating the two exprssions yields:
r 2 r
g R h1
2 1
g R h1
g
2
R h1
r 2 R 2 R h1
2
R 2 R 2 2 Rh1 h12
2 Rh1 h12
r 2 h12
R
2h1
– 10 –
g
Substitute this into our expression 2 :
R h1
g
2
r h12
2
h1
2h1
g
r h12 2h12
2
2h1
2 gh1
r h12
2
So therefore to maintain a height greater than h1 , the particle must have angular velocity
2gh1
r h12
2
2gh2
Similarly for h2 , the particle must have angular velocity .
r h2 2
2
2 gh1 2 gh
2 2 2
r h1
2 2
r h2
– 11 –
Question 12 (c) (i)
We simply extend the real component one unit forwards and backwards.
y
We will find Arg z 1 and Arg z 1 , and show that they differ by .
2
y
All we need to really spot, is that Arg z Arg z 1 , since the triangle enclosed by the
2
origin, z and z 1 , is an isosceles triangle. A basic angle chase using the exterior angle
theorem and the angle sum of triangle quickly yields Arg z 1 Arg z , where it
2
follows immediately that Arg z 1 Arg z 1 and thus the result.
2
– 12 –
Alternatively
y
We see immediately that since we have a semi-circle, the angle subtended by the points 1 , 1
and z form a right-angled triangle (Thales’ Theorem), so therefore we have
Arg z 1 Arg z 1 , and thus the result.
2
z 1
The required statement is equivalent to proving that tan , noting that Arg z .
z 1 2
z 1
tan
2 z 1
z 1
z 1
– 13 –
Question 12 (d) (i)
1 1
We know that BOC BC OA ' . We also know that ABC BC AA ' .
2 2
1
BOC BC OA '
2
ABC 1 BC AA '
2
OA '
AA '
OA ' BOC
From (i), we have .
AA ' ABC
– 14 –
Question 13 (a) (i)
To do so, we will substitute the line into the equation of the hyperbola, then let the
discriminant be zero
b2 x 2 a 2 mx c a 2b2
2
b 2 x 2 a 2 m2 x 2 2mcx c 2 a 2b 2
b 2 x 2 a 2 m2 x 2 2a 2 mcx a 2c 2 a 2b 2
x 2 b 2 a 2 m2 2a 2 mcx a 2 b 2 c 2 0
4a 4 m 2c 2 4a 2 b 2 a 2 m 2 b 2 c 2 0
a 2 m 2c 2 b 2 a 2 m 2 b 2 c 2 0
a 2 m 2 c 2 b 4 b 2 c 2 a 2 m 2b 2 a 2 m 2 c 2 0
b 4 b 2 c 2 a 2 m 2b 2 0
b2 c 2 a 2 m2 0
c 2 a 2 m2 b2
y mx a 2 m2 b2
– 15 –
Question 13 (a) (ii)
a 2 m2 b 2 mx y
a 2 m2 b 2 mx y
2
a 2 m2 b 2 m2 x 2 2mxy y 2
Since the two tangents are to be perpendicular to each other, we will let the product of roots
be equal to 1 , such that m1m2 1 .
So immediately, we acquire:
b2 y 2
1
a2 x2
b2 y 2
1
a2 x2
b2 y 2 a 2 x 2
x2 y 2 a 2 b2
– 16 –
Question 13 (a) (iii)
b2
1 e2
a2
b2
e 1 2
2
a
a b2
2
a2
So therefore:
OS 2 a 2 e 2
a 2 b2
a2 2
a
a b
2 2
OT 2
– 17 –
Question 13 (b) (i)
ma mg mkV 4
a g kV 4
g kV 4
dV
V
dx
U
V
xt dV
Vt g kV
4
dy
dy 2V dV V dV
2
Finding limits:
V U y U2
V Vt y Vt 2
– 18 –
U2
1 dy
x
2 Vt 2 g ky 2
U2
1 y k
tan 1
g
2 kg Vt 2
1 1 U 2 k 2 k
1 Vt
tan tan
2 kg g g
U 2 k Vt 2 k
1 1 g g
tan
2 kg U k Vt 2 k
2
1
g g
k
U 2 Vt 2
tan 1
1 g
2 kg kU 2 2
V
1
t
g
k
U 2 Vt 2
tan 1
1 g
2 kg g kU 2 2
V
t
g
1
tan 1
t
k U 2 V 2
2 kg g kU Vt
2 2
g
1 kg U Vt
2 2
tan 1
2 kg g kU 2Vt 2
– 19 –
Question 13 (b) (iii)
1 U 2 kg
x tan 1
g
2 kg
1 2 k
1 U
tan
2 kg g
1 k
tan 1 U 2
2 kg g
1 k 1 1 2 k
lim tan 1 U 2
2 kg U tan U g
lim
U 2 kg g
1
2 kg 2
4 kg
– 20 –
Question 13 (c) (i)
To find PT we group the m people and we will have n m people remaining. However, we
must also include the group as a single element, so we have n m 1! permutations for the
group + everybody else. We then permute the m people in the group, which yields m ! and
therefore PT n m 1!m! .
To find PS , we will consider the remaining n m people. If we put these people next to each
other in a line, there will be n m 1 ‘gaps’, in which we can place the m people, who are to
be separated. This way, we are guaranteed that they are all separated. Hence to choose
n m 1
positions for the m people, we have . We then permute the m people, which gives
m
us m ! and then the remaining n m people, giving us n m ! Therefore
n m 1
PS n m !m !
m
n m 1
n m !m !
PS m
PT n m 1!m !
n m 1
m
n m 1
n m 1!
m ! n 2m 1 !
n m 1
n m 1!
n m 1 m ! n 2m 1!
n m !
m ! n 2m 1 !
1
n m !
m m 1 ! n 2m 1 !
1 n m
m m 1
– 21 –
Question 13 (c) (ii)
n
Suppose that n is even, we can simply substitute m .
2
PS 1 n n 2
PT n 2 n 2 1
2 n 2
n n 2 1
2
n 2 !
n n 2 1 ! n 2 n 2 1 !
2
n 2 !
n n 2 1 !
2 n
n 2
1
Therefore PS PT .
Alternatively
PS 1 2m m
PT m m 1
1 m
m m 1
1
m
m
1
– 22 –
Question 14 (a) (i)
If we take the xy plane to be along the diagonal of the base, we have the following situation.
However, recall that the base of the vertex lies on the corner of the base, meaning that the
2
vertex is exactly units away from the base. We therefore have the equation of the
2
parabolas being:
2 2
2 2 2 2
y x , 0 x y x , x0
2 2 2 2
To find the value of h in terms of d, we can just use the function. From the diagram, we see
d
that when x , we have y h .
2
– 23 –
Question 14 (a) (ii)
From the diagonal of the slice, we can deduce the area of the slice.
Since the slice is a square, we can use Pythagoras’ Theorem. Let the side length of the square
be s.
s2 s2 d 2
2s 2 d 2
2
2 2h 1
2
s2 2h 1
2
V 2h 1 h
1
Integrate from 0 to :
2
2
V lim 2h 1 h
h 0
0 h 1 2
1
2 2
2h 1 dh
0
1
2 1
2h 2 2h 2 1 dh
0
1
2 2
h 2 2 h h h
2
3 0
1
2
4 2
h2 h h h
3 0
1 4 2 1 1
4 3 2 2 2
1
12
– 24 –
Question 14 (b) (i)
2
zk zk 1 zk zk 2 zk zk cos
2 2 2
n
2
1 1 2 cos ... since zk 1
n
2
2 2 cos
n
2
zk zk 1 2 2 cos
n
– 25 –
Alternatively
2 k 2 k 1
For simplicity, we let x and y .
n n
2k 2 k 1
2 2 cos
n n
2k 2 k 1
2 2 cos
n
2k 2k 2
2 2 cos
n
2
2 2 cos
n
So it is the equivalent of the length of one side of the polygon. But we have an n-sided
regular polygon, in which case the perimeter would be Pn n zk zk 1 .
– 26 –
Question 14 (b) (iii)
2
Let , so as n , 0 .
n
2
lim Pn lim n 2 2 cos
n n
n
2
lim 2 2 cos
0
2
lim 2 2 1 2sin 2
0 2
2
lim 2 2 4sin 2
0 2
2
lim 2sin
0
2
4
lim sin
0
2
sin
lim 4 21
0 2
2
1
4
2
2
Alternatively
Let , so as n , 0 .
n
2
lim Pn lim n 2 2 cos
n n
n
lim 2 2 cos 2
0
lim 2 1 cos 2
0
lim 4sin 2
0
2 sin
lim
0
2
– 27 –
Question 14 (b) (iv)
The above result is the perimeter of a circle, since the circle is a limiting case of an n-gon
when n gets infinitely large.
We know that a circle is unique to a set of three distinct points, in this case D, X and Y. So a
circle can indeed be constructed through those points. Since D is a mutual point, CD is also a
mutual tangent.
Alternatively
Hence CDY DXY , satisfying the converse of the Alternate Segment Theorem.
DC 2 CY CX
DC 2 CZ CW
CY CX CZ CW
CY XC ZC CW
CW CY
XC ZC
– 28 –
But note that CW CX XW and CY CZ ZY . Substitute this in:
CX XW CZ ZY
XC ZC
XW ZY
1 1
XC ZC
XW ZY
XC ZC
– 29 –
Question 15 (a) (i)
a
We evaluate I n 1 lim e x dx .
a
0
a
I n 1 lim e x dx .
a
0
a
lim e x
a 0
a
lim e x
a 0
lim e e0
a
a
1
1
u xn dv e x dx
du nx n 1dx v e x
a
a
I n 1 lim x n e x lim n x n 1e x dx
a 0 a
0
lim a n e a nI n
a
nI n
I n 1 nI n
n n 1 I n 1
n n 1 n 2 I n 2
...
n n 1 n 2 ...2 1 I1
dt
Let x ln t , such that dx .
t
x a t e a
x 0 t 1
But since in the previous integral, we had a , we will similarly have t 0 and thus the
new limit of integration will be some value b getting infinitely small.
b
dt
I n 1 lim ln t eln t
n
b 0
1 t
b
dt
lim 1 ln t t
n 1 n
b 0
1 t
b
lim 1 ln t dt
n 1 n
b 0
1
1
lim 1 ln t dt ... swapping limits uses up a 1
n n
b 0
b
1
1 lim ln t dt
n n
b 0
b
1 J n
n
So thus we have 1 J n I n1 . But from (i), we have I n1 nI n , which implies
n
1 J n nI n .
n
1
n
I
Hence n
Jn n
– 31 –
Alternatively
In
You could work out the actual reduction formula for J n , then find the ratio .
Jn
u ln t
n
dv dt
ln t
n 1
du n dt vt
t
1
J n lim ln t dt
n
b 0
b
1
n 1
lim t ln t n lim ln t dt
n 1
b 0 b b 0
b
1
lim 0 b ln b n lim ln t dt
n n 1
b 0 b 0
b
1
n lim ln t dt ... see Note
n 1
b 0
b
nJ n 1
NOTE
Computing J 0 : All people, who attempted this question and
acquired the result, assumed the limit
1
lim b ln b 0 without proof.
J 0 lim ln t dt
0 n
b 0
b 0
b
1
However, they were not penalised because the
lim dt
b 0
b average would have otherwise been too low.
1 The proof for this, which has been omitted
from this document, uses the Squeeze Law and
So recursively, we acquire J n 1 n!.
n
L’Hopital’s Principle.
I n n 1 !
J n 1n n !
1
n
1
... since
n
= 1
n 1
n
– 32 –
Question 15 (b) (i)
U f 1 1 f 2 1 f 3 1 ... f n 1 1
f 1 f 2 f 3 ... f n 1
1 1 1 1
...
1 2 3 n 1
H n 1
Observe that:
n
En H n 1 dx
1
1 x
H n 1 ln n
1
Adding to both sides, we acquire:
n
1 1
En H n 1 ln n
n n
H n ln n
1
lim H n ln n lim En
n n n
1
Since for large values of n, the term approaches 0.
n
– 33 –
Question 15 (b) (iii)
Base Case: n 1 .
LHS S 2 RHS H1 H 2
1
r 1
1 2 1
2
rr 1 r 1 r r 1 r
1 1 1 1 1
1 2 1 2 1
1 1
2 2
Inductive Hypothesis: n k .
Inductive Step: k k 1 .
1
r
2k 2
S2 k 2
r 1 r
1 1
r r
2k 2k 2
r 1 r r 2 k 1 r
1 1
S2 k
2k 1 2k 2
1 1
H k H 2k
2k 1 2 k 1
1 1 1
H k H 2k
2k 1 k 1 2 k 1
1 1 1
Hk H 2k
k 1 2k 1 2k 2
H k 1 H 2 k 2
RHS
– 34 –
Question 15 (b) (iv)
Recall that I r 1 r !
lim H n ln n lim H 2 n ln 2n
n n
S2 n H n ln n H 2 n ln 2n ln n ln 2n
n
H n ln n H 2 n ln 2n ln
2n
1
H n ln n H 2 n ln 2n ln
2
1
lim S2 n lim H n ln n H 2 n ln 2n ln
n n
2
1
ln
2
1
ln
2
Ir
But we observe that the summands are , so:
Jr
1
r
n
lim S 2 n lim
n n r
r 1
n
Ir
lim
n Jr
r 1
lim
n
r 1!
n Jr
r 1
n
r!
lim
n J r 1
r 0
n
r! 1
Hence lim ln
n
r 0 J r 1 2
– 35 –
Question 16 (a)
x y x y
x y
x y
k 0
k
k 1
b0 b1 x b2 x 2 ... bn x n b0 x b1 x 2 b2 x 3 ... bn x n 1
b0 b1 b0 x b2 b1 x 2 ... bn bn 1 x n bn x n 1
b0 b1 b0 x b2 b1 x 2 ... bn bn 1 x n bn x n 1
n 1
b0 b1 b0 x b2 b1 x ... bn bn 1 x bn x
2 n
n
b0 bk 1 bk x bn x
k n 1
k 1
– 36 –
Question 16 (b) (i) (2)
n
1 x R x b0 bk 1 bk x
n 1
bn x
k
k 1
n
b0 bk 1 bk bn
k 1
1
We now evaluate T .
1 n 1
T cn k k
k 0
n
cn k k
k 0
n
1
cn k n k
n
k 0
0
– 37 –
Question 16 (b) (ii) (2)
n
1 x T x cn ck ck 1
nk n 1
x c0 x
k 1
Note that the exponent is n k and that we have ck ck 1 as opposed to ck 1 ck like before.
This is due to the nature of the coefficients (in a sense ‘reversed’) of T x .
Again, similarly to (i), having x 1 yields us another Telescoping Sum, which results in
1 x T x 0 . Suppose is some root of T x . We then have 1 , similarly to (i).
1 1
However, recall that due to (b) (ii) (1), hence 1 and therefore 1 .
ak 1
We know that A , for all 1 k n , since A is defined to be the minimum.
ak
Re-arranging, we have:
Ak a
k 1
k 1
A ak
ak Ak ak 1 Ak 1
And hence we have (noting that all the values are positive since ak 0 A 0 ) :
– 38 –
Question 16 (c) (ii)
0 bn bn1 ... b1 b0
Since P 0 , then
a
k 0
k
k
0
n
k
bk
k 0 Ak
0
n k
k 0
bk 0
A
R 0
A
The claim, that the polynomial R appears here, is valid because of the inequality with the
coefficients.
Hence is a root of R x .
A
Similarly to (c) (ii), we have ak 1Bk 1 ak Bk and hence 0 a0 a1B ... an1Bn1 an Bn .
a
k 0
k
k
0
n
k
ck
k 0 Bk
0
n k
k 0
ck 0
B
S 0
B
The claim, that we have the polynomial S, is valid here because of the inequality with the
coefficients.
And hence is a root of S x .
B
– 39 –
Question 16 (d)
Since and 1 , we have 1 and hence B .
B B
Similarly, since and 1 , we have 1 and hence A .
A A
– 40 –