Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reduction of Iron Oxides in Solid Wastes Generated by Steelworks (#145287) - 126710 PDF
Reduction of Iron Oxides in Solid Wastes Generated by Steelworks (#145287) - 126710 PDF
26 (2002) , 37 – 44.
c TÜBİTAK
Received 05.12.2000
Abstract
Solid wastes generated by integrated iron and steel works cause environmental pollution and therefore
must be discarded accordingly. Extensive research is being conducted for the recovery and elimination of the
iron oxide that these wastes contain. The production of sponge iron from these wastes could be considered a
method of beneficiation. In this study, the reduction of cold-bonded pellets produced from the solid wastes
of Ereğli Integrated Iron and Steel Works (ERDEMIR), using different reducing agents, was investigated. A
rotary furnace was utilized for this purpose and the effects of different reducing agents, the ratio of Cf ix /
Fetotal , temperature and time on the reduction were studied. The kinetics of the reduction process were also
investigated and the data obtained were correlated with the Ginstling-Brounshtein model. The activation
energy of the reduction was found to be 48.5 kJ/mol.
Key Words: Solid waste, Reduction, Iron oxides, Steel plants, Sponge iron, Recovery.
37
ÇAMCI, AYDIN, ARSLAN
Table 1. Techniques developed for the beneficiating of solid wastes generated by the integrated iron and steel works.
The raw material used in this study was a mix- in ERDEMIR and the binders (clinker and BF slag)
ture of iron-oxide-containing solid wastes, prepared for the cold bonding agglomeration are shown in Ta-
with respect to their formation ratios in the actual ble 2 with the yearly production values of wastes.
plant. This mixture contained 67% of the stoichio- Powders of coke and graphite were used in the ex-
metrically required carbon coming from blast fur- periments as reducing agents. The chemical analysis
nace dust and sludge. Thus, coke dust, produced in of these reducing agents is shown in Table 3.
the coke plant of integrated steel works, was added
to this charge and reduction tests were performed.
The reduction behavior of the pellets was investi- Experimental Procedure
gated from the viewpoints of both utilization of the Materials were dried to remove the moisture.
cold bonded pellets in the blast furnace and in the Oily mill scale containing 24.6% oil was heated
sponge iron production. to 400◦C to remove the oil. All the materials
were crushed under 325 mesh. A waste mixture
Experimental was prepared, representing the waste generated in
ERDEMIR, containing 40% coarse mill scale, 20%
BF sludge, 15% BF dust, 15% BOF sludge, 5% BOF
Raw materials dust and 5% oily mill scale. This mixture contained
The chemical analysis of solid wastes generated 57.2% total iron and 9.7% C.
Table 2. Chemical analysis (wt %) of the solid wastes generated in ERDEMIR with the production rates of wastes and
binders (clinker and BF slag).
38
ÇAMCI, AYDIN, ARSLAN
Ar
Thermocouple
Gas NiCr-Ni
Output
Gas
Motor Input
Control Unit
39
ÇAMCI, AYDIN, ARSLAN
Experiments were started when the temperature seen in the figures, the amount of reduction increases,
reached the desired value. Pellets weighing 220 g for both Cfix / Fetotal ratios, as the temperature in-
were charged into the rotary furnace and argon was creases. As seen in Figure 3, a reduction period of
sparged in order to prevent re-oxidation during a re- approximately 60 minutes is satisfactory to reach a
duction period of 120 minutes. Samples of the re- reduction degree of 0.7 at 1100◦C, while it takes 110
duced pellets were taken every five minutes for the minutes to reach the same degree of reduction at
first 15 minutes of the experiment and every 15 min- 900◦C. A 22% increase in temperature reduces the
utes thereafter. Samples were placed in graphite cru- reduction period about 45%. At the same tempera-
cibles in order to prevent oxidation and kept in a ture, on the other hand, for a degree of reduction of
desiccator. Reduced samples were crushed, magnet- 0.5, a 22% increase in temperature causes a 67% de-
ically separated from char, and chemically analyzed crease in time required for reduction. As seen, longer
for total iron. reduction periods are required at lower temperatures
There are several terms associated with the ef- in order to reach the same reduction, and this period
fectiveness of the reduction reaction. Since weight increases with the degree of reduction.
loss is caused both by the oxygen leaving iron ox- Reduction of iron oxides occurs either by carbon
ides and by the gasification of the carbon containing or by carbon monoxide, formed by the gasification
reductants, it is difficult to calculate the “degree of of carbon. The reduction process carried out by the
reduction” of iron oxides with solid reductants from carbon is called “direct reduction”:
just the weight loss. Therefore, a simple formula
has been recommended that can be used to obtain
the degree of reduction. Equation (1) has been suc- F en Om + mC = nF e + mCO (2)
cessfully used by other workers (Rahman, Haque and
Haque, 1995; Mookherjee, Ray and Mukherjee, 1986; while the reduction process conducted with CO is
Haque, Ray and Mukherjee, 1992) to calculate the called “indirect reduction”:
degree of reduction (R):
F en Om + mCO = nF e + mCO2 (3)
%F ertotal − %F eitotal
R=K × 100 (1)
%F ertotal .%F eitotal
where K = weight ratio of total iron to that of oxygen mCO2 + mC = 2mCO (Boudouard Reaction)
in initial waste mixture, (4)
% Feitotal = percentage of total iron in initial
waste mixture, and The overall reaction involves a cyclic mechanism
% Fertotal = percentage of total iron in reduced in which CO2 reduced as a result of the reduction
mass. of iron oxides gasifies carbon to generate CO, which
in turn produces CO2 through oxide reduction. The
Results and Discussion reduction and gasification reactions are thus neces-
sarily coupled.
The process parameters of the reduction experi- In order to reach a high degree of reduction, the
ments were reaction temperature, Cfix / Fetotal ra- temperature should be higher than 1000◦C. Since the
tio, type of reducing agents, and time. The degree carbon gasification reaction (Boudouard reaction) is
of reduction vs. time data for the reduction reaction highly endothermic, a much larger amount of energy
was obtained under controlled experimental condi- is required (Sharma, 1993). Thus, the rate of reduc-
tions. tion is low at lower temperatures and the process
does not reach completion.
Effect of Temperature
Reduction experiments of the composite pellets
Effect of Reducing Agents
were carried out at 900, 950, 1000, 1050 and 1100◦C
with different coal consumption ratios. Figures 2 and In the sponge iron production experiments, coke
3 show the effect of temperature on the degree of re- and graphite were used as reducing agents. The first
duction for Cfix / Fetotal ratios of 0.17 and 0.38. As group of experiments was carried out without adding
40
ÇAMCI, AYDIN, ARSLAN
any reducing agent. Carbon came from BF dust and In the experiments where graphite powder was
sludge (Cfix / Fetotal = 0.17). In Figure 4, the de- used, the highest reduction attained was 70% at
gree of reduction is presented as a function of tem- 1100◦C and at a Cfix / Fetotal ratio of 0.45. This
perature for different Cfix / Fetotal ratios and at the reduction rate was achieved at a Cfix / Fetotal ratio
120th minute of isothermal reduction. According to of 0.24 when coke powder was used as a reducing
Figure 4, without the addition of reduction agent at agent, again at the same temperature.
Cfix / Fetotal = 0.17 ratio, there was not a sufficient
degree of reduction for the production of sponge iron. Effect of Cfix / Fetotal
This was due to the low stoichiometric ratio (0.67).
Also coke was more effective than graphite as a re- Reduction experiments were carried out at 0.17,
ducing agent in the production of sponge iron since 0.24, 0.31, 0.38 and 0.45 Cfix / Fetotal ratios. Fig-
coke’s reactivity was higher than that of graphite at ures 2 and 3 clearly indicate that increasing Cfix
1050-1100◦C (Schlebushch, 1984). / Fetotal ratios cause an increase in the degree of
reduction. Figure 5 displays the results of experi-
100 ments carried out at different Cfix / Fetotal ratios.
900 As seen from the figure, the required time for R=0.5
90 Cfix / Fe total = 0.17
950 is 38 minutes at a Cfix / Fetotal ratio of 0.24, while
80 1000 it decreases to 20 minutes at a Cfix / Fetotal ratio
70 1050 of 0.45, indicating that the required time decreases
1100 about 90% when the carbon used is 87.5% more than
60
stoichiometrically necessary. As can be seen, using
% Reduction
41
ÇAMCI, AYDIN, ARSLAN
0.4 900
50
0.3 950
40 1000
0.2
30 1050
0.1 1100
20 R = 0.5 R = 0.6
R = 0.7 R = 0.8 0
10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
t/t 0.5
0
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Figure 6. Experimental data compared with three differ-
C fix / Fe total
ent kinetic mechanisms.
Figure 5. Effect of Cf ix / Fetotal ratios on the degree of
reduction with increasing time at 1100◦ C, us-
ing coke as reducing agent. G(R) = 1 − 2/3R − (1 − R)2/3 = kt. (8)
42
ÇAMCI, AYDIN, ARSLAN
1050
1100
nace and/or in the production of sponge iron.
0.1 Higher reduction rates were attained by utilizing
coke powder, another form of solid waste produced in
integrated plants, as compared to the use of graphite
0.05 powder.
Cfix / Fe total = 0.38 With increasing temperature, the degree of re-
0 duction was increased and, in comparison, equal de-
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 grees of reduction were obtained in low reduction
Time (min) times. In order to reach a high degree of reduction,
Figure 7. Experimental data correlated by the Ginstling- the temperature should be higher than 1000◦C.
Brounshtein equation. For the economics of the process and from the
environmental point of view, the reduction should
-6 be carried out at the optimum time and Cfix /Fetotal
-6.2 ratio. In this study, this ratio is about 0.35 or the
C fi / Fe total = 0.38 stoichiometric ratio should be about 1.4.
-6.4
The kinetic study was carried out using coke as
-6.6 the reducing agent for the production of sponge iron.
ln k
References
Bryk, C. and Ku, W.K., “Reduction Phenomena in Metallurgical Engineering Department, 1998, (in
Composites of Iron Ore Concentrates And Coals”, Turkish).
Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 13, (2), 70-75, 1986. Dey, K.S., Biswanath, J. and Basumallick, A., “Ki-
Çamcı, L. and Aydın, S., “Entegre Demir- netics and Reduction Characteristics of Hematite-
Çelik Tesislerinde Ortaya Çıkan Katı Atıkların Noncoking Coal Mixed Pellets Under Nitrogen Gas
Değerlendirilmesi”, Proceedings of the 9th Interna- Atmosphere”, ISIJ International, 33, (7), 735-739,
tional Metallurgy and Materials Congress, 1, 97-103, 1993.
1997. Dutta, S.K. and Ghosh, A., “Study of Nonisother-
Çamcı, L., Masters Thesis, “Entegre Demir- mal Reduction of Iron Ore-Coal/Char Composite
Çelik Tesislerinden Ortaya Çıkan Katı Atıkların Pellet”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B,
Değerlendirilmesi”, Istanbul Technical University, 25B, 15-26, 1994.
43
ÇAMCI, AYDIN, ARSLAN
Haque, R., Ray, H.S. and Mukherjee, A., “Packed Schlebushch, D.W., “Kömüre Dayalı SL/RN Direkt
Bed Reduction of Iron Ore Fines by Coal Fines: Ef- Redüksiyon Yöntemi”, Symposium on Direct Re-
fect of Operating Variables”, Ironmaking & Steel- duction of Iron Ores, Middle East Technical Uni-
making, 19, (1), 31-35, 1992. versity, 1984.
Mookherjee, S., Ray, H.S. and Mukherjee, A., Seaton, C.E., Foster, J.S. and Velasco, J., “Re-
“Isothermal Reduction of Iron Ore Fines Sur- duction Kinetics of Hematite and Magnetite Pellets
rounded by Coal or Char Fines”, Ironmaking & Containing Coal Char”, Transactions ISIJ, 23, 490-
Steelmaking, 13, (5), 229-235, 1986. 496, 1993.
Philipp, J. and Endell, R., “How German Steel In- Sharma, T., “Non-Coking Coal Quality and Com-
dustry is Managing Waste Disposal”, Steel Technol- posite Pre-Reduced Pellets”, International Journal
ogy, 275-279, 1996. of Mineral Processing, 39, 299-311, 1993.
Rahman, M., Haque, R. and Haque, M.M., “Kinet- Szekely, J., “Steelmaking and Industrial Ecology Is
ics of Reduction of Millscale by Coal: Effect of Pro- Steel a Green Material ?”, ISIJ International, 36,
cess Variables”, Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 22, (2), (1), 121-132, 1996.
166-170, 1995.
44