Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the learners multiple reasons to use the language, helps them develop skills such as social and
linguistic, serves as a way to make knowledge meaningful, and facilitates learning. Therefore,
it is important to observe how every single person interacts in the classroom because it sets
the bases of how learning processes are going, and it also serves as a way to monitor the
teachers’ practices. The present report aims to analyze the diverse patterns of interaction
observed in a college classroom: Firstly, the report introduces the context of the classroom.
Secondly, some relevant concepts are explained to set the theoretical framework. Then, the
data collected during the observation is analyzed and, finally, some conclusions are
presented. The present analysis pretends to study the existing patterns of interaction and how
effective those patterns were for the learning process in the classroom.
So, what is the context? An English (English 1 / A1) class at a private university in
Cartagena was observed in order to analyze some classroom interaction patterns. The group
of students was composed of 24 students (teenagers – young adults). During the course, a
textbook was used by the teacher and the students (Project Success 1 – Pearson Education
where the teacher assigned activities for the students to practice at home or in the English
laboratory at university. The students had four English classes per week, 50 minutes long,
and they must attend the English laboratory 30 hours per semester.
To review the main concepts involved during the observation, a brief review on the
IRF concept, which was the dominant pattern during the observed class, is presented as
follows: The IRF pattern is well known for being one the dominant patterns of interaction in
the classroom (Hall, 2012) in which the teacher initiates (I), the student responds (R), and the
teacher gives feedback o continues with a follow-up action (F). It is also well known that the
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 3
initiation (I) is usually an instruction or question the teacher makes and serves to present the
topic of the class and the given concepts. Then, it implicates the student response (R), where
students show what they understand and what they can do with the provided contents. Finally,
the feedback serves for the teacher to evaluate whether the student is accurate/proficient or
not (Hall, 2010). This interaction pattern has been widely criticized and, as informed by the
- expression of identity (bringing their home culture or cultural 'niche' into their
classroom participation)”
because this pattern is more focused on what the teacher expects from the students.
Besides, keeping the IRF in a classroom with heterogeneous skill levels can be difficult
because it restricts the interventions from students with low performance, and increases their
anxiety levels. However, and as mentioned before, the IRF pattern has been commonly used
since the teacher can monitor how the students are progressing by questioning them, and
then, provide immediate feedback so the students can track their progress, too. Another
advantage of IRF is that it provides opportunities for the teacher to expand and make
elaborations on the contents of the class by giving further explanations (Su, 2017).
In the analyzed class, the observer detected IRF patterns, expansion and elaboration,
which is a type or input modification; and, recasts, a type of indirect correction. During the
class, there were found 52 complete IRF cycles. During the same time, indirect correction
was used 5 times in the form of recasts and input modification was used 8 times in the form
The cycle starts with the feedback word of another IRF cycle. Then the teacher asks a
question about a picture on the board. The question used by the teacher was closed-ended and
the used feedback to make indirect corrections was a recast. Recasts are very common among
English teachers and can be defined, according to the Longman Dictionary of Teaching and
incorrect o incomplete learner utterance by changing one or more sentence components while
In this cycle, the teacher repeated what the students said in order to give feedback and
introduce the correct content and meaning. This recasting practice was common during the
class and is also common in most English language classes, but its effectiveness needs to be
investigated more thoroughly (Banaruee, Khatin-Zadeh, & Ruegg, 2018) since there are not
many studies that prove it. This method of indirect correction form worked during the class
and the students remembered the concept during the future classes.
In this example, the teacher uses another closed-ended question, but the students
answer in their native language. The teacher tries to ensure that the students use and reinforce
the given concepts in L2 through explaining an example for the students to make mental
utterances which may exceed non-native speakers immediate ability to produce” (p. 108). It
was another effective strategy that worked with the students since they were able to recall the
In this cycle of IRF, which is actually two cycles, an example of scaffolding can be
observed. This term can be defined as “a process of ‘setting up’ the situation to make the
child’s entry easy and successful and then gradually pulling back and handing the role to the
child as he becomes skilled enough to manage it” (Bruner, 1983: 60). Scaffolding serves as a
form for the teacher to guide their students to learn in a more autonomous way which
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 6
promotes the students’ academic and linguistic development, as indicated by Walqui (2006).
Furthermore, in accordance with Wood (1988), scaffolding has three main characteristics that
can be seen in the example: scaffolding is contingent, collaborative and interactive. We can
see contingency because there are actions relying on other actions, collaboration due to the
collective achievement of the correct concept, and interaction, of course, since there are more
than one person engaged with the process. Another important characteristic of scaffolding is
that it occurs within the zone of proximal development (ZPD), which is the distance between
what students know and what they can learn potentially (Vygotzky, 1978). The teacher works
with the students’ ZPD and is able to scaffold them to the concept she wants them to acquire.
This type of classroom interaction worked since students got to know what the teacher
To sum up, the analysis of the class revealed that there was a total lack of other input
modification and indirect correction methods. The learning process throughout the class can
be considered as limited since interaction in L2 was almost null. Despite that, students
interacted with the teacher and they learned the concepts and were able to use them during
the next classes, which demonstrates they somehow learned. There is a tangible learning
process in which students were able not only to acquire certain concepts but recall them and
use them in future tasks. In spite of the lack of interaction in the target language, there was
interaction and it facilitated the students’ learning process. Without interaction, students do
not feel the necessity of using the language and they will not use it if they do not feel it is
necessary. Learning a second language and learning in general can be a complex process, but
interaction only makes it easier and helps learners see how necessary knowledge for life is.
Hence, teachers must ensure that there are plenty of ways for everybody to interact in the
classroom. Interaction makes learning possible and, more important, makes knowledge
tangible.
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 7
References
Banaruee, H., Khatin-Zadeh, O., & Ruegg, R. (2018). Recasts vs. direct corrective feedback
https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=banaruee+et+al+cogent+e
ducation+recast&btnG=#d=gs_cit&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3A_-
sii5T05qwJ%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl%3
Des
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/initiation-response-feedback-irf
Hall, J. (2012). Teaching and researching language and culture. Pearson Education. Harlow,
UK.
Press.
https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Investigating+the+Effecti
veness+of+an+Interactive+IRF-
Based+English+Grammar+Learning+System&btnG=#d=gs_cit&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 8
%3Dinfo%3AXwrHwDDcIJwJ%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26s
cirp%3D0%26hl%3Des
180.
Wood, D.J. (1988) How Children Think and Learn. Oxford: Blackwell.
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 9
IRE/F RECAST EE
1. Teacher: (Enthusiastically
greets her students and asks them to
make a brief presentation about last
class’ homework. After 10 minutes she
starts a new lesson). Guys! Right now, I
we’re going to watch a video but, first,
we’re going to see some new
vocabulary to understand the video, as
usual, ok?
2. Students: Ok (Almost
inaudible. It is 1:20 pm. They are
R
usually hungry and sleepy at this time
of the day).
3. Teacher: Sooo… (Shows
the first of N flashcards – A woman
carrying a bag with vegetables) you
F, I
guys tell me, what do you see here?
What is there on the picture? (Pointing
at the board).
4. Students 1, 2, 3, 4:
R
Shopping (almost inaudible).
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 10
5. Teacher: Shopping?
Hmmm… You four agree that it’s
shopping, right? May be but, guess
F, I RECAST
what? We have a verb! An action!
(Louder) And the verb is CARRY. You
know what carry is?
6. Students move their heads
saying no. Teacher starts doing
R
gestures like the woman on the
flashcard.
7. Student 5: Ahhh… Como
R
cargar?
8. Teacher: Yes, but in
English. The woman on the photo is
CARRYING (stresses on this word) a
F,I
bag with vegetables, ok? So,
everybody is going to repeat with me,
carry (slow and clear).
9. Students: (loud and clear, a
R
little less sleepy) Carry!
10. Teacher: Good! And…
What is this? (Pointing at the board
F, I
and showing another flashcard of a
man unboxing cans at a supermarket).
11. Student 2: Arreglar? R
12. Student 3: Organizar? R
13. Teacher: Hmm organizing?
Arranging? May be but, this guy is
UNPACKING (shows the verb
UNPACK) you see, he is taking cans F, I RECAST
from a box that was closed so he is
unpacking (emulates the action), right?
So, repeat with me, UNPACK!
14. Students: (in a better mood)
R
UNPACK!
15. Teacher: Very good! Next
F, I
one is easy-peasy! What are these?
16. Students: (Scattered) Box.
R
Box. Box.
17. Teacher: Box? How many
do you see? (Starts counting with her F, I RECAST
fingers)
18. Student 5: One, two,
R
three…
19. Students: Four box! R
20. Teacher: Box? Remember:
one box, four???? (gesture of F, I RECAST
question).
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 11
147. Students:
THEEEESE… (The teacher tells them R
to repeat it two times more).
148. Teacher:
I
THOOOOOSE!
149. Students:
THOOOOSE… (The teacher tells R
them to repeat it two times more).
150. Teacher: Oki doki!
Remember this sound is really special,
ok? Remember at the beginning of the
course I told you that THREE (shows
three fingers) and TREE (draws a tree F, I EE
on the board) sound different? It is
because of this TH sound, right? The
same happens with THIRTY, treinta,
right?
151. Students: Thirty,
R
thirty…
152. Teacher: and the
F, I
number trece, THIRTEEN, right?
153. Students:
R
thirteeeeeeen…
154. Teacher: and tercero,
F, I
THIRD!
155. Students:
R
Theeeeeerrrddd… (drowsily)
156. Teacher: Yes! Very
good! Don’t forget it! TH (mimics
exaggerately putting her tongue
between her teeth, everybody laughs).
HAHAHAH! Good, right now, let’s go
to our next lesson on page hmmm…
37!!!! which is aboooooout… This,
That, These and Those! Grammar!
Wiiiiiiii… (the teacher makes a boring F, I EE
face in purpose for the students to
laugh and engage more. It worked.).
Let’s see… (starts speaking in Spanish
as she sees that most students don’t
understand) estos son los que se llaman
en Inglés “demonstrative pronouns”
(she writes the title on the board) or
pronombres demostrativos.
157. Students:
R
(Inintelligible).
OBSERVING INTERACTION PATTERNS IN A COLLEGE CLASSROOM 20
Recasts: 5
Instances of intersubjectivity: 8
Expansion and elaboration: 10
IRF complete cicles: 52