Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
16
17 JOSEPH M. ROBINSON, ) NO.
18 ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF
19 ) CIVIL RIGHTS (US and WA CONST.)
20 Plaintiff, ) (1ST, 4TH, 5TH and 14th AMENDMENTS),
21 ) BATTERY, ASSAULT, INTENTIONAL
22 ) INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS,
23 ) FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISONMENT
24 v. ) MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, and
25 ) NEGLIGENCE
26 JORDAN BAILEY, Individually and in )
27 his Official Capacity as a SERGEANT) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
28 of the WASHINGTON STATE PATROL )
29 R.E. ELLIS, Individually and in his )
30 Official Capacity as a TROOPER of )
31 the WASHINGTON STATE PATROL; )
32 B.E. LANTZ, Individually, and in his )
33 Official Capacity as a LIEUTENANT )
34 of the WASHINGTON STATE PATROL )
35 JOEY GIBSON, TUSITALA JOHN )
36 TOESE, MATTHEW S. GRZOZWSKI, )
37 WILLIAM TANGER, CARL D. TODD, )
38 WILLIAM KNOX, DOES 1-1000, )
39 )
1 Defendants. )
2 ______________________________ )
3
4 JOSEPH ROBINSON, the Plaintiff herein, by and through his attorney, alleges as
5 follows:
6
7 I. JURISDICTION
8
9
10 1. This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to
11 Title 28, United States Code Sections 1331, 1332, 1343, and 1367, and venue is
12 properly set in the Western District Federal Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391.
13 2. The claims upon which this suit is based occurred in this judicial district.
14 3. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and on that basis allege, that each of the
15 named Defendants, except for Defendant Todd who lives in an immediately adjoining
17
18 II. PARTIES
21 Washington. Plaintiff was the victim of a violent and completely false and unlawful
22 detention and imprisonment carried out by the Patriot Prayer Defendants in this action
23 and then ratified by his immediate arrest by officers and commanders of the
1 Washington State Patrol at the request of Patriot Prayer, despite a complete lack of
2 actual probable cause. This arrest and treatment are consistent with a clear pattern
3 and practice by Troopers and Commanders of the WSP to take arbitrary and
5 demonstrators such as Patriot Prayer, the Proud Boys, and various militia groups, all
6 groups that contain at least a Neo-Nazi and White Supremacist component. The
7 result here, as in many cases was coercive conduct designed to force Plaintiff to
8 relinquish and to take away from him his First Amendment Rights to Free Expression
9 and Free Association as well as his Fourth, Fifth, and 14th Amendment Rights.
12 Upon knowledge and belief, LIEUTENANT LANTZ is and was at the time of the
15 scope of his duties AND AS PART OF A POLICY favoring pro-Trump and so-called
18 government interest.
1 Upon belief, SERGEANT BAILEY is and was at the time of the injuries complained of
3 (hereinafter identified as WSP) acting within the scope of his duties AND AS PART
4 OF A POLICY favoring pro-Trump and so-called alt-right protestors over and against
7 2.5 Defendant WSP TROOPER R.E. ELLIS, upon belief resides in THURSTON
8 or PIERCE County within the Western District of Washington State. Upon belief, R.E.
9 ELLIS is and was at the time of the injuries complained of in this complaint, an
11 as WSP) acting within the scope of his duties AND AS PART OF A POLICY favoring
12 pro-Trump and so-called alt-right protestors over and against those opposing them
14 government interest.
16 COUNTY within the Western District of Washington State. By information and belief,
17 JOEY GIBSON is the founder of “Patriot Prayer” and a leader of the “Proud Boys”,
18 both far right groups with extensive ties to Neo-Nazi, White Supremacists, and Neo-
19 Fascist groups and individuals, and has been linked to and charged with multiple acts
1 of violence and hate crimes. Gibson also has been active in aggressive misogynist
5 and belief, TOSITALA JOHN TOESE is active in both “Patriot Prayer” and the “Proud
6 Boys”, both far right groups with extensive ties to Neo-Nazi, White Supremacists, and
7 Neo-Fascist groups and individuals, and has been linked to and charged with multiple
8 acts of violence and hate crimes and currently has at least one warrant out for his
9 arrest. TOESE also has been active in aggressive misogynist and homophobic
10 actions. By information and belief, TOESE is GIBSON’s chief lieutenant and enforcer.
11 TOESE illegally searched Plaintiff, pulled him up from where GRZOZWSKI had
12 tackled him, dragged Plaintiff over to the police line and gave a false statement to the
16 active in both “Patriot Prayer” and the “Proud Boys”, both far right groups with
18 individuals, and has been linked to multiple acts of violence and hate crimes.
19 GRZOZWSKI grabbed and choked Plaintiff from behind as Plaintiff was peacefully
20 attempting to make his way across Red Square at Evergreen State during the incident
2 ground and held him there, assisted by TOESI, GIBSON, and other Defendants
5 MASON COUNTY within the Western District of WASHNGTON, active in both “Patriot
6 Prayer” and the “Proud Boys”, both far right groups with extensive ties to Neo-Nazi,
7 White Supremacists, and Neo-Fascist groups and individuals, and has been linked to
8 multiple acts of violence and hate crimes. By information and belief, WILLIAM
11 imprisoning Plaintiff and then gave a knowingly false statement to the WSP
12 Defendants to ensure that Plaintiff would be arrested and charged with a crime he had
13 not committed.
16 “Patriot Prayer” and the “Proud Boys”, both far right groups with extensive ties to Neo-
17 Nazi, White Supremacists, and Neo-Fascist groups and individuals, and has been
18 linked to multiple acts of violence and hate crimes. By information and belief, CARL
1 imprisoning Plaintiff, participated with TOESE in dragging Plaintiff to the State Patrol
2 line and then gave a knowingly false statement to the WSP Defendants to ensure that
3 Plaintiff would be arrested and charged with a crime he had not committed.
7 active in both “Patriot Prayer” and the “Proud Boys”, both far right groups with
9 individuals, and has been linked to multiple acts of violence and hate crimes. By
10 information and belief, William Knox was the initial Defendant to block Plaintiff’s path
12 KNOX then began berating and threatening Plaintiff and giving him orders as if Knox
14 imprisoning Plaintiff, and then gave a knowingly false statement to the WSP
15 Defendants to ensure that Plaintiff would be arrested and charged with a crime he had
16 not committed.
17 2.12 There are other persons, identities presently unknown to Plaintiffs, who
18 are and were at all times mentioned herein, supervisors, incident commanders,
20 STATE PATROL and/or other agencies who acted in concert with the above named
1 Defendants and who devised or approved the actions that are the subject of this
3 POLICING IN FAVOR of Right Wing and Far Rightwing groups and putting their
5 against Donald Trump, and anti-fascists and in doing the things hereinafter alleged,
6 acted under color of STATE and FEDERAL LAW as agents of the WSP and other
7 involved but unnamed entities, and/or other involved individuals and/or agencies and
9 2.13 There are other persons, identities presently unknown to Plaintiff, who
10 are and were at all times mentioned herein, members of or affiliated or aligned with
11 Patriot Prayer and/or the Proud Boys, and or other groups sympathetic there to who
12 were involved in the incident in question and participated in the harm inflicted on
13 Plaintiff.
14 2.14 DOES 1-500 are, and were at all times mentioned herein, law
18 Development, training in, policy leading to the biased policing, restricting, false
19 detention, false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and or use of force
20 against Plaintiff and the violations of Plaintiff’s Constitutional Rights in the incidents
1 that are the subject of this action, or Exercise Of Police Force and Control, and/or
2 failing to discipline officers, thus tacitly encouraging these incidents to occur against
3 Plaintiffs that are the subject of this action, and in committing the acts and omissions
4 herein alleged, acted under color of state law as law enforcement employees, agents
5 of the Washington State Patrol and/or any political subdivision thereof, and/or any
6 other governmental entity who came to the scene, and violated Plaintiffs’ rights as
7 discussed.
9 Plaintiff, who are and were at all times mentioned herein, members of or affiliated or
10 aligned with Patriot Prayer and/or the Proud Boys, and or other groups sympathetic
11 there to who were involved in the incident in question and participated in the harm
12 inflicted on Plaintiff.
13 2.16 This action is brought pursuant to the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth
15 2.17 On August 16, 2018 a Tort claim was presented electronically to the
17 Law. Risk Management acknowledged the claim in writing and then rejected the
18 claim. The 60 days for the State to accept the claim has expired.
19
20
1 III. FACTS
4 3.2 The actual controversy did not develop at the time, but later when a
7 students and faculty of color to be allowed to take over the campus for one day to
9 3.4 Into this conflict, Joey Gibson and Patriot Prayer, a far-right group with
11 inserted themselves.
12 3.5 Gibson and Patriot Prayer were one of a number of extremely violent and
13 intimidating groups of the far right (cleverly calling themselves the “alt-right”) that
14 emerged during and after the 2016 election, attaching themselves to the Trump
16 3.6 Gibson also affiliated himself with a parallel group called the Proud Boys
18 3.7 The two groups have left a trail of violence and disruption around the
1 3.8 These efforts have been aided by sympathy and cooperation from law
2 enforcement personnel and agencies. This has been particularly prevalent with
5 support these far-right groups and arrest, impede, attack, and otherwise disrupt efforts
7 3.10 When Gibson and Patriot Prayer announced their intention to stage a rally
8 in the middle of Red Square, on June 15, 2017, the State Patrol responded by
9 ordering the campus closed, cutting off bus service, and doing their best to give
12 3.11 In order to do so, the involved commanders and supervisors, by their own
13 statements authorized “Patriot Prayer” to make arrests, something the State Patrol
14 had also done with the “Proud Boys” “the 3 Percenters” and other far-right groups.
15 They then backed those arrests by ratification and taking the targeted individuals off
16 to jail and charging them with crimes they had not committed.
17 3.12 All of this is in conformity with the unofficial, but widespread pattern and
18 practice of the Washington State Patrol giving unfettered free and access to locations
19 and carrying out their duties in a biased manner in favor of far right demonstrators and
4 organized.
5 3.14 JOSEPH ROBINSON was on his way across Red Square to the counter-
6 demonstration when his path was blocked by Knox, Todd, and other members of
7 Patriot Prayer, all under the specific direction and control of Gibson.
9 and Gibson informed him that he couldn’t go through that area of a public plaza where
12 again at GIBSON’s direction grabbed ROBINSON by the throat from behind and
13 began choking him, and then assisted by TOESE, KNOX, TODD, GIBSON and others
15 3.17 The State Patrol Officers did not respond to this clear and obvious
16 assault.
1 3.19 When the illegal search revealed a harmless pocket knife of a type
2 typically and lawfully carried by a large number of people, TOESE announced that
5 to the WSP line where ELLIS, at the direction of LANTZ and BAILEY, immediately
8 they simply took contradictory and clearly false statements from the Patriot Prayer
9 Defendants after placing Robinson into custody and then took him off to jail.
10 3.22 When Robinson was released from custody, hours later, his knife,
12 without comment.
13 3.23 The only charge the arresting /charging officers could come up with was
14 disorderly conduct.
15 3.24 No officer ever stated anything about who initiated any altercation or even
16 that Robinson was physically or verbally assaultive, ELLIS simply described pushing
17 and telling and then the decision was made to charge Robinson with causing the
1 3.25 No officer bothered to note that Patriot Prayer’s location was between the
2 entrance to Red Square from the parking lots and the location of the counter-
3 demonstration.
4 3.26 Nor did they ask, or report that Patriot Prayer initiated the confrontation
5 and assaulted Robinson who did not act in any violent or confrontation manner.
6 3.27 Also revealing is the fact that Ellis does not identify Patriot Prayer or the
8 Trump” demonstrators despite the fact that the demonstration, the counter-
9 demonstration, and the issues were not focused in any way on Trump and had
11 3.28 The criminal case against Robinson dragged on for nearly 11 months
13 3.29 The criminal case caused great disruption to Plaintiff’s life and ongoing
15 3.30 The arrest occurred on his 35th birthday, souring the experience.
16
18
20 acts of Defendants, Plaintiff sustained deprivation of his First, Fourth, Fifth, and
1 Fourteenth Amendment Rights, deprivation of liberty, pain and suffering and injury in
4 negligent acts of Defendants, Plaintiff has had to retain legal counsel to vindicate his
6 reimbursed.
10 against him followed by the emotional strain of nearly a year of criminal prosecution
11 for something the involved officers knew or should have known he did not do and the
12 informal deputation of a band of far right thugs as putative law enforcement officers,
13 who allowed to carry out a false arrest, illegal search, and use of excessive force are
14 liable for the same, and a vicious attack on his Constitutional Rights including the
15 Right to speech and assembly, and unbiased and equal law enforcement and incurred
16 medical and legal costs and disruption of his life, all in an amount to be proved at trial.
18 personal harms Defendants inflicted on him, and the chilling effect their actions had
20
2
3 COUNT ONE
4 VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS
5 (TITLE 42 U.S.C. SECTION 1983)
6 (As to All Individual Defendants and DOES 1-100)
7
8 5.1. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations set
10 5.2. In committing the acts complained of herein, Defendants acted under color
13 (a) The right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law;
14 (b) The right to be free from invasion or interference with Plaintiffs’ zone of
15 privacy;
19 (f) The right to be free from discriminatory and retaliatory law enforcement;
20 (g) The right to participate in a peaceful and lawful First Amendment exercise,
21 to Freely Express his political views, to Petition the Government for Redress of
22 Grievances, to Freely Associate with and Assemble with others to do so without fear
1 (h) The right to be free from False detention and False Imprisonment, in
4 5.3 In violating Plaintiff’s rights as delineated above, and other rights according
5 to proof, Defendants acted by use of force, ratification of violence by those they were
6 politically sympathetic to, false arrest, malicious prosecution based on knowingly false
7 statements, misuse of their authority and position to advance their own political views
8 or by ratifying personally the above listed conducts, and/or cruel and unusual
9 punishment for purported violations of law that Plaintiff did not commit, and conduct
10 that was legal and protected, Defendants acted to violate Plaintiff’s rights under the
12 5.4 DOES 1-200 are the other officers involved directly in the incident in
13 question.
14 5.5 Dies 501-100 are the Members and participants in Patriot Pride whose
16 5.6 As a direct and proximate result of the violations of his Constitutional rights
17 by Defendants, and each of them, Plaintiff suffered general and special damages as
20
1 COUNT TWO
2 Violation of Civil Rights
3 (Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983)
4 (As to DEFENDANTS BAILEY, LANTZ and Does 201-500)
5
6 5.7 Plaintiff realleges and incorporate herein by reference the allegations set
8 5.8 At all times herein mentioned, the incident commander, Lieutenant Lantz,
9 Sgt. Bailey, their supervisors, and the overall WSP commanders and officials and
10 those of any other agency involved in the planning, response, and execution of the
11 policies and procedures involved with the law enforcement response and actions at
12 this incident and other substantially similar responses by Officers of the Washington
13 State Patrol acted with the deliberate intent to attack and silence the opponents of far
14 right groups, as well as Trump and his supporters no matter how outrageous, created
16 train, supervise, and discipline officers who engaged in this conduct. All of this
17 directly resulted in the harm to and false detention, arrest, imprisonment, and
18 malicious prosecution of Plaintiff, and all of the harm related thereto. This policy and
19 actions based thereon deprived Plaintiff of his rights secured by the Constitution of
20 the United States, including, but not limited to his rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth,
21 and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and rights under the Washington
22 State Constitution.
2 acted deliberately to ratify the above-described policy and actions, and participated in
3 the creation and implementation of this policy, and failed to properly train, supervise,
5 5.10 In committing the acts complained of herein, and in their official and
6 individual capacity, Doe Defendants acted with a design and intention to deprive
7 Plaintiff of rights secured by the Constitution of the United States and acted with
10 Plaintiffs have suffered general and special damages as set forth in this complaint.
23 unlawful as he had violated no law, and certainly not the one he was charged with,
24 and were in direct retaliation for his exercise of his First Amendment Rights and the
2 Plaintiff’s conduct was protected under Article 1 of the Washington State Constitution,
4 5.14 Patriot Prayer Defendants acted as and were allowed to act as de facto
5 law enforcement officers- carrying out an arrest, a use of extreme force, and a search
6 as if they were actual law enforcement officers, and thus are liable for those actions.
7 Plaintiff was forcibly and illegally detained, arrested, held for hours and then charged
8 criminally simply because he exercised his Free Expression rights to dissent under
10 Constitution and for exercising his First Amendment political association, Freedom of
11 Assembly and Free expression rights with content that officers of the State Patrol
12 disagreed with politically and were offended by. Defendants had no legal basis for so
13 treating Plaintiff.
15 of Plaintiff was also part of and calculated to justify the policy discussed in counts one
18 rights by Defendants, and each of them, Plaintiff suffered general and special
2 reckless, and was of such a nature that punitive damages should be imposed in an
7 COUNT FOUR
8 FALSE ARREST
9 (As to All Defendants)
10
14 LANTZ, AND BAILEY and does 201-500 formally arrested Plaintiff, who had not
15 violated any law, because they did not like the specific content of the demonstration
16 and because DEFENDANTS TOESE AND TODD presented Plaintiff for arrest without
17 cause after they and GIBSON, GRZOZWSKI, TANGEN, KNOX, and Does 501-1000
18 stopped Plaintiff, violently seized and choked him, threw him to the ground, and
19 searched him, acting as law enforcement officers with the cooperation and backing of
20 the actual law enforcement officers and met the Hodari definition of an arrest and
1 deliberately had him taken to the jail and charged with a crime that they knew or
4 had not committed any violation of law whatsoever, and should not have been
5 arrested.
7 or a warrant violated Plaintiff’s’ rights under the Washington State and U.S.
8 Constitutions, and further resulted in the incarceration and false charging and
11 and/or reckless, and was of such a nature that punitive damages should be imposed
14 Plaintiff has suffered general and special damages as set forth in this complaint.
16
17 COUNT FIVE
18 FALSE IMPRISONMENT
19 (As to all Defendants)
20
21 5.24 Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations
1 5.25 As a result of the false arrest by Defendants ELLIS, , and DOES 1-200,
2 directed by Defendants LANTZ, AND BAILEY and does 201-500 and DEFENDANTS
4 Plaintiff was held at the scene, and taken to and held in the Thurston County Jail for
6 5.26 Plaintiff was unjustly deprived of liberty for that period and subjected to
7 abuses therein.
8 5.27 As a further direct and proximate result of the false arrest and
10 this complaint.
12 reckless, and was of such a nature that punitive damages should be imposed in an
15
16 COUNT SIX
17 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
18 (As to All Defendants)
19
2 reports and written statements and in sworn testimony Defendants, and each of them,
4 maliciously prosecuted, and to have the arrest and charge permanently on his record,
5 despite its dismissal, resulting in great harm to Plaintiff that continues to this day.
6 That prosecution dragged on for almost 11 months disrupting Plaintiff’s life and
9 rights by Defendants and their tortious conduct against him, Plaintiff suffered general
11 5.32 The acts of Defendants were extreme and outrageous, and would be so
13
14
15
16 COUNT SEVEN
17 NEGLIGENCE
18 (As to All Defendants)
19
20 5.33 Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate herein by reference the allegations
1 5.34 Law Enforcement Defendants, and those acting as law enforcement, and
2 each of them, owed Plaintiffs a duty to use due care in law enforcement and not
6 and each of them, negligently breached said duty, directly and proximately resulting in
10
11 COUNT EIGHT
12 INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
13 (As to All Defendants)
14
17 5.37 In carrying out the detention, arrest, violent assault, illegal search,
19 the exercise of his Constitutional rights, and other acts alleged throughout this
20 complaint, Defendants, and each of them, sought to cause emotional distress and
21 trauma to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff did suffer such emotional distress with accompanying
22 physical symptoms.
2 rights by all Defendants’ tortious conduct against them, Plaintiff suffered general and
4 5.39 The acts of Defendants were extreme and outrageous, and would be so
7 and outrageous and/or reckless, and was of such a nature that punitive damages
8 should be imposed in an amount commensurate with the wrongful acts alleged herein.
10
11 COUNT NINE
12 BATTERY AND ASSAULT
13 (AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS)
14
15 5.40 Plaintiff realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations
17 5.41 In carrying out the detention, false imprisonment, violent assault, illegal
19 TODD, TANGER, KNOX, AND DOES 501-1000 acted in an illegal, and intimidating
20 manner, causing great pain and injury to Plaintiff and causing him, throughout to
21 reasonably fear additional such pain, and continued harmful and offensive touching.
1 5.42 The WSP Defendants, Ellis, Bailey, and Lantz, and Does 1-500 continued
2 the battery against Plaintiff causing him to fear continued harmful and offensive
4 5.43 All of Defendants sought to use force and coercion to force and intimidate
5 Plaintiff into abandoning his First Amendment Rights to express an opinion they
6 disagreed with, to petition the government for redress, and to freely associate with
8 5.44 As a direct and proximate result of the violation of his rights by all
9 Defendants’ tortious conduct against them, Plaintiff suffered general and special
11 5.45 The acts of Defendants were extreme and outrageous, and would be so
14 and outrageous and/or reckless, and was of such a nature that punitive damages
15 should be imposed in an amount commensurate with the wrongful acts alleged herein.
17
18
19
20 VI. JURY TRIAL DEMAND
4 1. For general damages including pain and suffering together with special
5 damages for Plaintiff’s reasonable and necessary legal expenses, and medical
6 expenses both past and future, the exact amount of which will be established at the
7 time of trial;
11 1988;
13 5. For court supervised training and regulations requiring that the involved
14 agencies and officers not adopt procedures and policies and/or take actions designed
15 to suppress First Amendment activity and target participants therein, and or target
17 educate hem that they cannot arrest a subject for refusing to identify themselves,
19 6. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
20
4 __/s/______LAWRENCE A. HILDES_____
5 LAWRENCE A. HILDES, WSBA # 35035
6 P.O. Box 5405, Bellingham, WA 98227
7 (360) 599-4339
8 lhildes@earthlink.net
9 Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH ROBINSON