Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/272158845
CITATION READS
1 6,166
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Navdeep Sharma on 12 February 2015.
AT T I
D E L L A « F ONDA Z ION E GI O RG IO RO NCHI»
EDITORIAL BOARD
VARIETY
SUMMARY. – This paper gives a concise introduction to the space settlement. It expresses the
essential design features and crucial requirements for initiating the structural design. Considering
the previous published structures, different concepts are analyzed e.g. living area, structure, day and
night cycle, gravity, and safety etc. the hybrid design is chosen to be the most reasonable. During
the process of designing the concepts of physics behind the space settlement design were considered.
In the proposed settlement design to enhance mining activities and refining of minerals for the
manufacturing of space based infrastructure (at L5) for 10,000 residents emphasize on the structure
and certain parameters of infrastructure. The structure consists of a residential torus, four quartered
rings, a beaded torus, central cylinder and zero-g heavy manufacturing cylinder with the scope of ex-
pansion plans. The structure rotating at 0.95 rpm ensures different values of g at different structural
components. The beaded torus constituting industrial area rules the pedigree from safety point of
view whereas quartered rings incorporating agricultural activities reflect their importance in future
term stipulations. Two separated ports have been introduced to reduce redundancy in the event of
an accident. An assortment of various facilities like enhanced food production using Nutrient Film
Technique (NFT), competent power generation using solar energy, atmosphere control through
competent and proficient systems like trace contamination control system, accurate management of
waste within the settlement are great supporters to let the residents believe in its incomparability.
1. Introduction
Man has been Earth dweller for millions of years and its resources are being
used continuously which has lead to their depletion, among them one is Power.
In order to overcome the crises of power, world is shifting from hydro to solar
power. To fulfill the energy demands of the entire world; one needs a big structure
of solar panels capable of providing electric energy in giga watts. Firstly, in 1968
Dr. Peter Glaser suggested (1) to construct solar Power Satellite (SPS) contain-
(*) Dept. of Physics, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar- 143005, India. Phone :
09417932547, e-mail: dramanmahajan@yahoo.co.in
(†) Dept of Physics, Police D.A.V. Public School, Jalandhar – 144001, India. Phone:
09814210126, e-mail: navdeep2512@yahoo.co.in
140 N. Sharma - A. Mahajan
ing solar panels. In space, solar energy is 144% more than surface of Earth. Also
the factors like effect of weather and exposure time are in the favor of space. The
structures of such satellite will be very large, which requires continuous human
attention.
The second alluring factor regarding space settlement is space mining. For
example, Platinum group metals (PGMs) (2) are abundant on asteroids and even
Moon; and are scarce on the surface of Earth. So such materials can be fetched on
the Earth for various industrial applications.
Thirdly, the most logical endeavor is space tourism. People want to explore
space as a place to spend vacations and to pursue towards the goal of expanding
humankind into space
In 1869, it was the beginning of the space colonization when, first time, Ed-
ward Everett (3) used the word inhabited artificial satellite. Then, in 1920 various
writers like Bernal, Oberth, Von Pirquet, and Noordung used the word space
colonies in their books. The idea of space colony continued in the publications
by Wernher von Braun (4) in 1952. In 1961, Sagan was the first scientist to hy-
pothesize about terraforming (5) in a technical journal. After the first sponsored
studies (6) at Stanford University in 1975 and 1976, various books like “Colonies
in Space” by T. A. Heppenheimer (7) and articles were published in boosting the
idea in the aerospace technical community. Princeton physicist Gerard O’Neill
(8) in 1970’s, with the help of NASA and Stanford University showed ray of hope
for establishing a giant orbiting spaceships to act as a habitat. In 1975, Johnson
R. D. and Holbrow C. showed that orbital space colonies were practically feasible
(9). By 1976 NASA published the proceedings of a workshop examining the feasi-
bility of terraforming Mars (10). Louis J. Halle (11), formerly of the United States
Department of State, wrote in Foreign Affairs (Summer 1980) that the space colo-
nies will protect us at the time of nuclear warfare. In 2005, NASA, Chief Michal
Griffin (12) identified that the ultimate goal of space flight program will be space
colonization. Physicist Stephen Hawking (13) has said:”The long-term survival of
the human race is at risk as long as it is confined to a single planet. But once we
spread out into space and establish independent colonies, our future will be safe
and we will be able to protect humans from natural disasters like asteroid collision
or human disasters like nuclear war etc”.
Space settlement involves the creation of artificial and self-directed
biospheres, which can adapt to the conditions like surface, atmosphere, ventila-
tion, day and night cycle, and so on. In short, we can say that Space settlement
is the home away from home. The fundamental needs of people living in space
mentioned below:
i. Location of the settlement.
ii. Design Considerations (includes exterior and interior).
iii. Life Support System.
iv. Technology used to construct such a huge structure and the technology
for running the various functions of the settlement.
Space settlement design study - An overview 141
There are lots of options available for the settlement in space, such as:
a) On the surface: It can be the surface of Moon, Mars or of some big as-
teroid. Generally, we don’t consider other planets for settlements because of their
unfavorable conditions. Mars (14) and Moon (15) are most suitable as they have
all the necessary materials required for colonization like water, gases and metals.
b) In orbit: In fact, orbital location has nothing except few atoms per cu-
bic centimeter. There are various candidates’ locations (16, 17, 18), prominent
among them are five Lagrange libration points (19) of Earth-Moon orbit. Among
them only L4 and L5 are the points, where station keeping requirements are mini-
mum. For fulfilling the primary requirements these locations suit, as the distance
of NEA’s and Moon is very accessible from Earth. Al Globus (20) in his book
Anon, Orbital Space Colonies, explained the sweeping edge in comparison to the
surface. Overall, the idea of constructing a settlement on the surface is very much
inferior in comparison to the orbit except for the access to the materials. O’Neill
also emphasized on a colony in space as compared to the colony on the surface,
by giving the following considerations:
1. Gravity: The values of g on Moon and Mars are very less as far as the
physical aspect of human beings is concerned but very high in compari-
son to inter orbital motion. To increase the value of g on the surface is
a very tedious and expensive process. While on the free space, we can
produce pseudo-gravity by using the concept of centripetal force.
2. Solar energy: Solar energy is considered to be the first choice for power
production. In an orbit continuous, ample, reliable and free solar ener-
gy can be obtained in comparison to the surface of Mars and Moon. A
square meter of space receives around 7.5 times (21) the sunlight received
by an average square meter on the whole of the Earth.
3. Approaching the surface is More Expensive: The transport cost to get
to the Moon is about twice as high as compared to go out into free space.
Since to reach the moon from Earth, firstly, we will have to use energy in
order to escape from gravitational pull of Earth and then in the second
phase energy is required against gravitation pull of Moon. Similar is the
case of Mars and other planets.
4. Growth Potential: The settlement on the surface will easily get materials.
On the other hand, in the orbital settlements we can easily get materials
from NEO’s, which are more in variety as compared to the surface of
Moon or Mars.
The main consideration for designing the residential area is acceleration due
to gravity. In order to fulfill the physiological needs of human beings (22) we
need value of g around one. There are various alternatives to produce g (23) e.g.
142 N. Sharma - A. Mahajan
straight line accelerated motion, heavy mass at the center of the settlement, tidal
forces by placing heavy mass on the settlement, electromagnetic field, rotation etc.
Among them rotation around an axis is considered to be one of the effective and
efficient methods to produce gravity. The value of the rate of rotation with the
radius of the big structure can be verified by using gravity calculator (24).
While designing the interior of the space settlement we take care of the
operational infrastructure and human factors, which include physiological and
psychological aspects, (9, 25) e.g area required per person, transportation cor-
ridors, safety criteria line of sight, day and night cycle, tree lining, good commu-
nity design, comfortable modern community, economical survivability, access of
entertainment, etc.
In the life support system (26), we can include pressurized and unpressur-
ized areas covering all physiological and psychological needs. The various opera-
tions and infrastructure required for the establishment of the space settlement can
be power generation, atmospheric effect, temperature control, Plantation, waste
management, water management, day and night cycle, communication etc.
iv. Technology
Initially three feasible shapes for orbital settlements Stanford Torus, Bernal
Sphere, O’ Neill Cylinders were proposed.
The NASA-sponsored studies developed the Stanford Torus (6) having inte-
rior cross-section of about 420 feet, for the population of 10,000 people and offers
Space settlement design study - An overview 143
large volume of atmosphere. One rpm was provided to the structure of one mile
in diameter, in order to produce constant 1 g at the end caps. For generation of
day and night cycle, sunlight is reflected by floating mirror taken above the settle-
ment. The solar power was considered to be the major source of electric energy
used inside the settlement. The Bernal Sphere (28) was also intended for the same
number of people, who would reside in the sphere positioned at the middle. At
either end of the spherical section Sunlight was directed into the interior by mir-
rors for day and night cycle. The agriculture area was designed in the banded
torus shape (for providing different climatic conditions for different crops) on
either sides of the sphere. The most striving of the space settlement designs was
O’Neill cylinder also called Island Tree (29). This design considered diameter
of four miles and length twenty miles could accommodate population up to ten
million. To provide natural light to the residents, three window areas of two miles
width, alternative to land areas of same width were provided. Agriculture and
manufacturing area is provided around the other end of every cylinder in small
ringed pods.
Although the above designs are fulfilling the basic requirements, but they
have certain drawbacks like shielding mass, wobble control, rotational instabil-
ity, natural light exposure etc. Therefore, by considering practical possibilities,
the design must be the hybrid one. Lewis One (30) is an example of the hybrid
designs. It is a Sun synchronous cylinder, 1921m long 267m radius with flat end
caps completely shielded for cosmic rays. Cylinder is rotating at 2 rpm to provide
1-g pseudo-gravity at the rim. There are two shielded, micro-g 100 m construction
bays, out of which one is pressurized. Each is large enough to work on complete
gravity-modules with 10m radial and 20m axial clearance. Agriculture is of six
levels within the gravity-module, starting at 1/6 g and working outward in 4m
increments. For more agriculture area, additional levels may be added without
major design modifications. Like all the early settlements, an insufficient area was
allocated in Lewis one for solar energy collection. Thus, it is also under-powered.
Moreover, one of the major engineering problems in this design is that the rotat-
ing part is kept at few meters from non-rotating shielding. Contact between these
is a disastrous failure mode.
Similarly, an orbital settlement Kalpana One (31,32) was suggested by a
group of scientists, having cylindrical shape with a radius of 250m and a length
of 325m with rate of rotation 2rpm. The structure considered the wobbling effect
remedy by computerized control weights attached to cables on motorized winch-
es. Internal cylinder arrangement with low value of g is provided for industrial,
storage and agriculture.
In 2010, a paper (33) was presented on the “Tesla” Orbital Space Settlement
for mining the NEOs. The shape of the settlement is taken to be truncated torus
144 N. Sharma - A. Mahajan
having radius 397m for residential area and cylinder of height 500 m and radius
150 m at the middle for industrial activities and recreation zone. 1g is provided by
rotating torus at 1.5 rpm.
5. Proposed design
FIG. 1
Exterior view of settlement.
FIG. 2
Space allocation in settlement.
FIG. 3
Dimensional side view of settlement.
Space settlement design study - An overview 147
FIG. 4
Cross sectional view of settlement.
FIG. 5
Top view of settlement.
other. In case of emergency the detached capsule will be replaced with a newly
constructed capsule.
Central cylinder (radius 100 m and height 700 m) with micro gravity (≈ 1
ms–2), will be provided with four elevators have access to different operational
units. It will also host different facilities (volume 2.2×106 m3) like a docking port
at the lower end cap, water storage area, recreation, power production and distri-
bution unit and control center.
The upper part of central cylinder (height 50 m and radius 150 m) provides
storage facilities (Volume 3.5×106 m3) with docking port at the top. This portion
having micro g , will refine extra terrestrial material and manufacture the compo-
nents for future space projects.
A biaxial reflecting mirror made up of polyethylene terephthalate polyester
(36) inclined at 450 to the plain of the settlement for maintaining day and night
cycle. It has the potential to reflect up to 97% of sunlight. To ensure day, the
mirror will reflect sunlight in the torus for 14 hours followed by 10 hours night
by flipping of mirrors. During night solar panels at the back of the strip will face
the sunlight and absorb solar energy. Intensity of light can be controlled by using
electro chromic smart glass (37).
6. Infrastructure
The artificial gravity 9.4 ms-2, in residential torus will be obtained by rotating
the settlement at 0.95 rpm, by using Pulsed Inductive Thrusters (PIT)(38). These
thrusters will provide a pulse of 200 times per second by the input of 1 MW. This
rotation will provide micro g in central cylinder and value of g 5.9 ms-2 and 4 ms-2
in both sets of quarter torii of agriculture area respectively.
The selection of materials for different layers will be done by considering their
properties, so that the layers of outer wall may disperse most of the debris and ra-
diations striking the settlement. The layers of Super adobe (source – lunar soil) (39)
and Silica aero gel (source-Moon) (40) in the wall and Lead crystal glass (source-
Moon) (41) in the window will provide protection from radiations inside the settle-
ment. In addition, to the layers, the plasma shielding (42) around the periphery of the
torus will also provide protection from radiations. When the potential will be sup-
plied to the gas (Argon) it will ionize and repel the radiations by its induced magnetic
field. It will reduce the radiation intensity to less than 0.1 rem which is very less than
the acceptable radiation dosage. Consecutive layer of Nextel (43) (source – Moon)
and Kevlar-49 (44) (source – Moon and NEA) in the outer wall and lead crystal glass
(source – Moon and NEA) in the window will shield the settlement against debris.
Per person requirement of electric power (covering all needs of residential,
agriculture and industry) is taken to be 60 KW. Thus, total electric power re-
quired is 600000 KW. By using solar panel calculator (45), the required covered
area for producing this much power is 5160000 m2. For which Solar panels will
be installed on backside of the mirror (2543400 m2), central cylinder (440000
Space settlement design study - An overview 149
m2), two agriculture rings-1 (532418.4 m2), two agriculture rings-2 (354945.6 m2),
industrial zone (345086 m2) and on the residential torus just covering the curved
surface of the basal area i.e. down surface (1002288 m2).
The volume of the atmosphere required in residential torus (volume above
down surface) is 1.1×108 m3. The partial pressure of O2-170 mmHg, N2 – 200
mmHg, CO2 – < 3 mmHg and water vapors – 7.5 mmHg, is maintained in the
settlement, sufficient enough for human survival. The volume of atmosphere re-
quired in the plantation ring is 9×106 m3. The level of carbon dioxide will be
maintained to get effective productivity from the plants due to photosynthesis by
crop plants. A variety of trace organisms may be present in the atmosphere of resi-
dential area. To ensure the health of residents, thermally re-generable activated
carbon beds (46) will be used to eliminate trace organisms. For the removal of
a broad variety of airborne organic contaminants an excellent sorbent (activated
carbon) can be used. Moreover, airborne solid organisms will be removed with
the help of high efficiency particulate air filters.
Initially, the food will be taken from earth, and after a few months, the settle-
ment will be empowered enough with crops to accomplish the food requirements
using Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) (47). The plants will grow in a constant
flow of nutrient enriched water. Combination of sunlight and LEDs will be used
to provide light to plants.
As the system will be closed loop-like, it needs to be governed by recycling
of waste. Delamination technology (48) will be used to deal with wastes like
electronic components including steel, copper, aluminum and plastics. Organic
wastes will be recycled through an anaerobic digester (49) deployed in the agri-
cultural torus. Methane, formed as a side product in this digester, will be used for
household purposes. Remnant waste would be degraded using microwaves and
then dumped on the asteroids. To manage the inorganic wastes including indus-
trial wastes, a microwave incinerator (50) would be used.
Generally, we consider that the symmetrical structure would be rotationally
stable. But because the movement of people in the settlement cannot be sym-
metrical therefore settlement tends to wobble. Also, there are chances of irregular
motion in the axis of rotation of a large symmetric rotating object known as nuta-
tion (51). Symmetry of rotational objects can’t be maintained on a large scale. In
order to control violent motion we use active mass dampers (52).
7. Design features
• For redundancy in the event of an accident, two docking ports are pro-
vided.
8. Conclusion
Although various proposals are there for first space settlement but, when
we consider the hybrid design of the space settlement following steps are to be
followed:
1. Check the requirement of settlement (whether it is for mining purpose
or it is for tourism purposes). Design the structure with proper size (radius) to
produce 1g or around it.
2. There should be specific location of residential area, agriculture area, in-
dustrial area and storage area. The area requirements can be calculated by taking
NASA summer study as base.
3. The location of docking ports should be specified in the structure. These
will link the settlement with the earth and other mining bases.
4. Then the selection of materials can be done which depends upon the
selection of location of the settlements. e.g.:
i) When the orbital settlement is at one of the libration points, the best
choice is to get raw materials from moon.
ii) When the orbital settlement is near the Mars, then the best choice is to
get raw materials from the surface of Mars.
iii) Similar is the case with the settlements designed in an asteroid belt.
5. The designed settlement should be according to the laws of physics.
6. The details will include exterior and interior designs with the consider-
ations of life support systems.
7. The physiological and psychological needs of human should be fulfilled
in the design.
8. While designing the settlement always keep in mind about the expansion
plans.
9. The contemplation should be given to technology for communication.
10. All the technical planning must have backup plan.
REFERENCES
(1) GLASER P.E., Power from the Sun, It’s Future, Science, 162, 857-886, 1968.
(2) BLAIR B.R., The role of Near-Earth Asteroids in Long-Term Platinum Supply, Space
Resources Roundtable II (Colorado School of Mines), (Golden, Colorado, 2000).
(3) HALE E.E., The Brick Moon, Atlantic Monthly, 24 (141), 1869.
(4) VON BRAUN W., Crossing the Last Frontier, (Colliers, 29, 24-29, March 22,1952).
(5) SAGAN C., The Planet Venus, Science, 133 (3456), 849-858, March 24, 1961.
(6) JOHNSON R.R., VERPLANK W., O’NEILL G.K.., Space Settlements: A Design Study, Report
of NASA-ASEE Engin. Systems Design Summer Program, Ames RC, June-Aug. 1975. Web
version, Dec. 1999, GLOBUS A., YAGER B., SEZEN, T., GLOBUS, R., http://lifesci3.arc.nasa.gov/
Space settlement design study - An overview 151
SpaceSettlement/75SummerStudy/Design.html.
(7) HEPPENHEIMER T.A., Colonies in Space, (Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA, 1977).
(8) O’NEIL G.K., The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space, (Space Studies Inst. Press,
Princeton, NJ, 1976, 1977,1982, 1989).
(9) JOHNSON R.D., HOLBROW C. (Eds.), Space Settlements: A Design Study. NASA SP-413,
1975. Retrieved Dec. 8, 2003. http://lifesci3.arc.nasa.gov/SpaceSettlement/75SummerStudy/
Design.html.
(10) AVERNER M.M., MACELROY R.D., On the Habitability of Mars: An Approach to Plan-
etary Ecosynthesis, NASA SP-414, 1976.
(11) HALLE L.J., A Hopeful Future for Mankind, Retrieved December 1, 2007.
(12) GRIFFIN, Humans Will Colonize the Solar System, Washington Post. Retrieved De-
cember 1, 2007.
(13) HAWKING, Move to new planet, BBC News. Retrieved December 1, 2007.
(14) BOSTON P.J. (Ed.), The Case for Mars, AAS Sci. Technol. Series, 57, 1984.
(15) JÄRVSTRÅT N., Lunar colonization: Why, How and When?, Ad Astra, 14 (2), 32-34,
March/April 2002.
(16) KOELLE H.H., Lunar bases: Strategies, Concepts, Prospects and P Kodistribution, Berlin
Jär lans, draft in limited. (2001).
(17) MCKAY C.P., TOON O.B., KASTING J.F., Making Mars Habitable, Nature, 352, 489-496,
1991.
(18) (Rabinowitz 97) RABINOWITZ D.L., Are Main-Belt Asteroids a Sufficient Source for the
Earth-Approaching Asteroids? Part II. Predicted vs. Observed Size Distributions, Icarus, 127 (1),
33-54, May 1997.
(19) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_poin.
(20) ANONIMOUS, Orbital space colonies, in: AL GLOBUS, Reference books title.
(21) STRICKLAND J.K. JR., Space Solar vs Base Load Ground Solar and Wind Power, Online J.
Space Comm., 16: Alternative Energy, 2010.
(22) HALL T.W., Artificial gravity and the architecture of orbital habitats, J. British Inter-
planetary Society, 52, 290-300, 1999.
(23) http://www.verticalfarm.com/designs.html.
(24) http://en.wikipedia.org/artificial_gravity.
(25) MARTINEZ V., Architecture for space habitats. Role of architectural design in planning
artificial environment for long time manned space missions, Acta Astronautica, 60 (4-7), 588-593,
February-April 2007.
(26) JACK SPURLOCK J., COOPER W., DEAL P., HARLAN A., KAREL M., MODELL M., MOE P.,
PHILLIPS J., PUTMAN D., QUATTRONE PH., RAPER C.D. JR., SWAN E., TAUB F., THOMAS J., WILSON
CH., ZEITMAN B., I-2. Research Planning Criteria for Regenerative Life-Support Systems Applicable
to Space Habitats. NASA Sp-428. Space Resources And Space Settlements. I-2. (http://lifesci3.
arc.nasa.gov/SpaceSettlement/spaceres/I-2.html).
(27) KOMERATH N. ET AL., System Design of Large Space Structures Using Tailored Force
Fields, AIAA Space, 2006.
(28) STUART M.L., Aesthetic Considerations in the Bernal Sphere Design, Space Manufac-
turing III, Proc. of the Fourth Princeton/AIAA Conf., May 1979.
(29)SCHMIDT S., ZUBRIN, Islands in the Sky - Bold New Ideas for Colonizing Space, (John
Wiley and Sons, 1996)
(30)GLOBUS A., The Design and Visualization of a Space Biosphere, Space Manufacturing 8,
Energy and Materials from Space, (Space Studies Inst., May 1991), pp. 303–313.
(31)ARORA, N., BAJORIA A., GLOBUS A., Kalpana One: Analysis and Design of a Space Colo-
ny, 47th Conf. on Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials, No. AIAA-2006-2183, AIAA,
ASME, ASCE, AHS, ASC, May 2006.
(32)GLOBUS A., ARORA N., BAJORIA A., STRAUT J., The Kalpana One Orbital Space Settle-
ment Revised, April 2007.
(33)MISRA G., The “Tesla” Orbital Space Settlement, 40th Intern. Conf. on Environmental
Systems, AIAA 2010-6133.
152 N. Sharma - A. Mahajan
(34)GRAYBIEL A., Some Physiological Effects of Alternation Between Zero Gravity and One
Gravity, in: Space Manufacturing Facilities (Space Colonies), ed. J Grey, (Am. Inst. of Aeronautics
and Astronautics, 1977), pp. 137-149
(35) DOHERTY T.J., LEWIS & CLARK, The Psychological Impacts of Global Climate Change,
Am. Psychologist, 265, © 2011, Am. Psychol. Ass., 0003-066X/11, 66 (4), 265–276, May–June
2011.
(36) http://www.amsterdamcannabisseeds.com/increase-light-brightness-with-reflective-
material.html.
(37) DEB S.K., Photovoltaic-Integrated Electrochromic Device For Smart-Window Applica-
tions, presented to the World Renewable Energy Congress, Brighton, U.K. Nrel/Cp-590-28116,
July 1-7, 2000.
(38) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pulsed_inductive_thruster.
(39) HUSAIN Y., Space-Friendly Architecture: Meet Nader Khalili, Space.Com. 17 Nov.
2000. 19 Jan. 2007 (http://www.space.com/peopleinterviews/khalili_profile.html).
(40) http://www.appliedseparations.com/supercritical/lab_inst/bench_top/x-aerogels.asp.
(41) http://www.drct.com/dss/Lead_glass/lead_glass.htm.
(42) www.3m.com/ceramics/pdfs/outerspace_apps_brochure.pdf.
(43) www.cosis.net/abstracts/COSPAR02/02570/COSPAR02-A-02570.pdf.
(44) DESTEFANIS R., AMERIO E., BRICCARELLO M., BELLUCO M., FARAUD M., TRACINO E.,
LOBASCIO C., Space Environment Characterisation of Kevlar: Good for bullets, debris and radiation
too, TAS-I - Thales Alenia Space-Italia S.p.A., Strada Antica di Collegno, 253 - 10146 Torino
(Italy).
(45) www.settlement.arc.nasa.gov/designer/sphere.html.
(46) RAY CH.D., CARRASQUILLO R.L., MINTON-SUMMERS S., Summary of Current and Fu-
ture MSFC International Space Station Environmental Control and Life Support System Activities,
SAE, 27th Intern. Conf. on Environmental Systems, (Lake Tahoe, Nevada July 1997), pp. 14-17.
(47) WINTERBORNE J., Hydroponics: Indoor Horticulture, (Pukka Press, 2005), p. 113.
http://books.google.com/books?id=Mwv_jnw6QQwC&pg=PT112&lpg=PT112&dq=vertici
llium+wilt+in+hydroponics&source=bl&ots=P1qhxpiqW_&sig=ikcfSN1w3c6RZEYm0jMF
sF-YU4s.
(48) KANG H.-Y, SCHOENUNG J.M., Electronic waste recycling: A review of U.S. infrastruc-
ture and technology options, Elsevier, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 45, 368-400, 2005.
(49) An introduction to anaerobic digestion, anaerobic-digestion.com. Retrieved 2007.
(50) DUCHARME C., Technical and economic analysis of Plasma-assisted Waste-to-Energy pro-
cesses, Dept. Earth and Environmental Eng., Found. of Eng. and Appl. Sci., Columbia Univ.,
September 2010.
(51) SIDI M.J., Spacecraft Dynamics and Control: A Practical Engineering Approach, (Cam-
bridge Aerospace Series).
(52)REINHORN A.M., SOONG T.T., HELGESON R., RILEY M., CAO H., CHU J., Analysis, De-
sign, and Implementation of an active mass Damper, Univ. at Buffalo.
ATTI DELLA “FONDAZIONE GIORGIO RONCHI” ANNO LXVIII, 2013 - N. 1
INDEX
Announcement Pag. 3
Biology
M.S. KARIM, S.S. CHIAD, N.F. HABUBI, H.L. MANSOUR, K.A. MISHJIL,
Study of specific activities of some biological samples for selected Iraqi Governorates » 5
History of Science
D. GALLI, A. GASPERINI, S. BIANCHI, Dalla meccanica celeste alla spettroscopia
stellare - Corrispondenza tra Giovanni Battista Donati e Ottaviano Fabrizio Mossotti » 15
Materials » 85
A. HASHIM, Synthesis and Characterization of PS-BaSO4.5H2O Composites
Pattern Recognition
C.S. KUMAR, D. MANIKAVELAN, M. MURUGESAN, V.P. RAMAMURTHI, » 89
Genetic and ant colony algorithms for face recognition and detection systems
Science of Vision » 97
L.R. RONCHI, Familiarizing with color language. I - Evolution and written language
Thin Films
S.S. BATROS JAMIL, H.M. FADHEL, The effect of irradiation by Cs137 and Co60 » 119
on the optical and spectral response properties of Lead Iodide thin films
S.S. CHIAD, N.F. HABUBI, Estimation of the Dispersion and Optical Parameters
of sprayed CdS Thin Films by Chemical Spray Pyrolysis at Different Substrate Tem- » 131
peratures
» 139
Variety
N. SHARMA, A. MAHAJAN, Space settlement design study. An overview