92

FEDERAL BUREAUOF INVESTIGATION*

,. L- L ERG-ATE

SUMMARY!

2
PART of 2

FILE NUMBER : 139-4089

.
y.
ii

:2»$

=2;
F:
92i-
-.¢
. _92
5
5...
§"_'...r
.
;'_'

1..
ts n
£
E- ,1
_r,;
I99. 1 4
- ;#
1- ='
";
3%1--_.-
Ra-9.
=1"1-
.-.~<
$3 E~T§ . .
vi&#39;1

lg ;
tif
.4,-.
.§"#-
&#39;1 -4

-2-ti
av
~,__ 7
..
1;; h ...
soc.i!ir.
»._ 92-
-.3 .&#39;
.>0 ».~> /54* D .-A.D.-
19=_.:
:H
3*
&#39; &#39; A n$ii;i§§
Asst. Dir.:
5 WATERGATE
SPECIAL
PROSECUTION
FORCE *{__&#39;~&#39; Admin.
&#39;
7?-»
-1-.
1 ,
a .-3...--
United States Department of Justice
N.
I425 K Street. W.
it 0,»,
" 3
Comp. S &#39;st.
- F

£3 1-_ __,,./&#39; 20005

Washington,D.C. ales 5: C
Gen. Im
.@T.&#39;;»; ,% Ident. ..
Inspection ______
IntelL
5;92 Lab=.&#39;1.-z-
frnr ____
8» 1 October 16, 1975 Plan. & Efval_ _
.-H Spec. Inv. ._____
.
Training _______
i.-*-if
21
Legal Conn.______
92..it
Zr. it
T0 110.
ROUTE FOR
SIGNATURE
Jfa. , Telepho e Rm. _
Dir " e y

%&#39;
:9"
Honorable Clarence Kelley
M.
&#39;."=
151&#39;
fax
"."
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
. sf
-Eh.
1..7
Washington, D. 20537
C.
,&#39;
//Tp! //_}
. 1I
fr?1"
, DearClarence: E
:r§,,.e
 1 92
&#39;
¢I. F. /L" _
J =l.
- .<=-_92
I. --.&#39;
-
-&#39; &#39;2&#39;
if
11&#39;
2--" .,
=2
h.-- ._1,
l
.1 ?i!.¢&#39; &#39;
I -
F; -..*_,
_- » -
gage O
§: ",
re
&#39;.B&#39;,&#39;.
&#39;1-
I .$v_vWeY 9Et9 ??9EEBlt19l5_REP°RT
OF &#39;
, g"
.:
.$-5
&#39;
F -..|-"I
s fwA1"1&#39;-:R@ATE
§I3scI,aL _3RQ$§.Q¥ITl
*1K91;~ 1:?:_
&#39;,&#39;f
, _ .. |.
-a. .
v .&#39;-
.H_H
sswi
The
&#39; Report of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force
sh?»-
92&#39;
/. WSPF! describes the work of WSPF during the 28-month period
I- -12&#39;.
,&#39;
-@y%.
-_ .L*-
§_. ,,, -- 92
office as Special
,____-
5?
..-Y 5_ ,
.92-Ti,- Q
. f .
-Hi £-
a;r
_

H»

b: .
75» 1&#39;
it.-_ &#39;1,"
- 5"-I
~,§. *5!»
,,u:_ .
it a-
"1
-ii
,,_
n*$P 92
..-_.W-
,

5 &#39;
Tr. 1&#39;
~ s

H&#39;-.~
0-.
.= &#39;_,
92!.&#39;~
$~%
&#39;
gt :- - -
..,.

.r ; ii-j
- E,

59$
2 3.
:§=
"w _
7., &#39;:>-
&#39;.1;?
* QI i

"._,
."., _

.-,3,
!=-P &#39;.-.-
1-> :1
H 2&#39;.
»___.+~
»:lLin
N. ll4
_.-.- =7
.2*.
4

I
a
Y
.92.&#39;
92.
,r-
.
*1
,~
_.
1HI--

J31.
1
4:jg-
_-F
&#39;3&#39;
.1.
&#39;
. 92
5
.
§.
&#39;:92-&#39;_¥.

§§
1

_
~;.-.
r
.15;
-
I-I
Z3.," .&#39;;.-= _&#39;- 2-
.__.-.,
1.L 331
.3.- if !
1;, ., -,-.
5:2
1&#39;-&#39;
.
$ ...~
E?&#39;31:.
,92.-
;.
&#39;.
1.,
cg
_j-
92
¥Q",
.
&#39;_
14
I;-.
ti
.e
. -1- E
KJ
2-V
.&#39;_?I _
1 E;
&#39;
[.2
.
._+,-
-12-
"%&#39;
Ev
;_f&.&#39;
;»=§-F,

;
15

11&#39;

I
{e~13I-1&#39;2?
._s_.u-
-. &#39;.
I
,_&#39;

A
J,»

, .41
1 "&#39;
-._.
*3
é
*1

-&#39;7&#39;
.

-A.s
. ~.
.1
--._.
&#39;
l. §_,_.:
-xi

.4-;; T;
&#39;-

?1
is
:;?&#39;
u
.5
=
£1-.
.- -r-
.1-.;

1;
.;, ait _.@ rh
3H &#39;
"i&#39;_-
92
,+
&#39;
3
4-
.2-
f _.
..92,
.-_?..= 3!
T

it
5;.-
-_f F
.-&#39;.
&#39;1-4

g.
-:~&#39;

.K
.H
5 a;
ii iiii
.-FE
ii
. :-,"{-&#39;5
J=2
"1&#39;
.gL._ 592
.%
1;.
.1
s--
1&#39;s1&#39;-
-,1-;.
e "4
92

g £3
ii
is

ai5%
Fea F-k

-41» ,.
I.
-
I--J

--.£3~5
.A
Fa:
?_
-:
PSPF Recogmendations Chapter 5! .
-.
=e3&#39;-.: 1. Protecting the_Integrity and_Effectiyeness_of the
fr ErOSeeuti@n.Fus252Qa
_. ,=< --»
-~I:-: _-e
J! *2
~-.-
|- ,- s
<- H U
&#39;

3 P
:_s
-J- 3 -
." =
4E
g;1
-s
vi +¢i -1
f;
-:_&#39;_r
- iv
&#39;
9s.
~;&#39;.
11! $1
.-we
as

5&#39;1

at
. ;;&#39;_.
.1
.. _-15.
as

=a~rs
.. §r
.5.-
&#39;4.-

Rs
. B-
;4&#39;.-
1;.
-.R.
,1"
&#39;
._ ., __,.
P-5
..,~
,-&#39;.-
.-=
:.0 .92

. [ _ l } "; Qkja
I
J" &#39;.
~r
A:. $-
r_ =
&#39;i : _ g_
92;-_

It&#39;-5
1&#39;-1
regular review
of agency policies, internal inspec-
tion procedures and
other checks on how sensitive
&#39;_!&#39;
u. functions are being performed.
.s
_a.-»_&#39;
-¢.;§. - A constitutional amendment should clarify
if and
w&#39;1 ? when a President in office is subject to criminal
--
.,. prosecution.
"tr.-
3&#39;?"
if."
¥ 3. Control
of Intelligence and ational SecuritZ_
Functions
4-
3; 2 -
Ur as .- All intelligence
agencies should issue written
3" policies setting forth types
of domestic intelli-
». gence to be gathered and methods to be used.
&#39;-
".1:
1
E-I
These policies should
be reviewed by a domestic
intelligence policy review board.
1a3.-
is - The Administration should clarify its Present
._.~
it policy on warrantless searches and seizures
is _.&#39;: in connection with foreign intelligence investi-
;j+ 4:§.- gations. »
2%..r.
_ 4- §Qli i9 l_Fi¥éD¢iH&_8Ud QsmPaign,Ta¢tic§
Lg
,.
} &#39;--&#39;
5&#39;» - The Department
of Justice should take the initia-
 cf-
,_
.
F"
-~=
la
R:
,&#39; .-
..92-.-.-1
¢-&#39;_rn
-:1
,. -P

4-
&#39;*&#39;
..,. .
5- .
-1
;
*15,*0
~;
._9292
Ara
:
:1;
_.¥ .
,_.
A .
Q;
.15}
ll -
55
-J1»
-1
."§..
1?
.-_92
5-. ..
--
:..
%;
_92 92-.&#39;_
-L.

. -if;
i
s
is
-2.4
. ;»§§=
vi
;e~
.-5&#39;
._,.
_.
- 5.
-:=.¬92"&#39;
ha
.;&#39;,_._:
>13
r
rag; ii
se J5.

&#39;1!
,. it
-is . 92 92

at~11: 2-.3?
&#39;2
r$.&#39;;"
if
-5 _

ii ? &#39; _
:1-p->
1 . ii, The authority of the Federal Election Commission
..
at
.
should be broadened with respect to "dirty
.~- W» tricks" to enable it to promulgate standards
~;=
_.~.
1&#39; of unaccepted campaign conduct.
2;;
.; It-1;.
.- -Y
&#39;1
J .&#39; WSPE Policies and Procedures for Investigation and Prosecution
e&#39;_. I hapter Z!
5l A. beginning Investigations
IF Q The Reportdescribes the various sources of infornation
. .,_-_.
&#39; .-,

*: on the basis
of which decisions were made to undertake investi-
.-
. 1.. 1
r
;. J
r.

&#39;1.
1
_.1 .,_.
.
4
1!
<.I
_
92v
P

"-
»92
-1
J. .
,,..92 .§
r
#-5..
>%
?E 73
Jo as
W
31¢.
I
->1 z"-&#39;-
ali-
.~.-"1
,,.
2?
-.s~<="
B.
_92-L-
ff
.vs_ _5 -

.r _-7. .
la; .3
...&#39;r".&#39;
!-.Sr
. - F:
"J:.; &#39;
-Y}
The Report describes the various methods used for obtain-
J-.-
.1. - P. ing information from witnesses, including FBI interviews, of-
.=-
- -_
___.
&#39;5
1;
1} &#39;9 fice interviews and bringing the witness before the grand jury
at~ s and the role each of these methods played in WSPF&#39;s
investiga-
..
92. . .-.1-
M1&#39;
_=_.r tions. It notes that about
only 30 of the several hundred wit-
Ii-&#39;
;&#39;-..»
31
_.. -s ;-gqa-.-_ -Q -A --A-.-aa I-I-4 -n-1--: Au--"ea-I - <A w A » an»-.-I-4-in-I -:q~|-wneq-e~=§--noan In -Inn-unusual A
ll bb b WCLC
W1 ! -Lil -CLVJ-CVl&#39;§:92lWKZLC
E1-Ql.|.|-CL-L .I.-l92lI.|.l.|l92.||>.|..|.J.92.-J
Qlllc -l.I.§
d-D U-L
Y.
-&#39;:
H5"; obtaining crucial information. An important reason for this

.3; was WSPF&#39;s

belief that most of those who were at relatively

.£ it "low" levelsof the conspiracies and

other
wrong-doing it was
.,,. mi-&#39;
it J. investigating held important positions of public trust
and were
if
- L!
.._;_ ._| not entitled complete
to immunity. Whenever possible in such &#39;
.15 -4-.
&#39;.-&#39;.~
i.T .~=
F
f-1 situations, WSPF sought obtain
to the information itneeded on
.1

,.
the basis
of a plea bargain in order
that a court could im-
ié ts;

.
- ..
?&#39;. pose an appropriate penalty.
I51 >=92&#39;;
§
.g C. Chareins
__
Jul.7 and
-H1_4% Disposing il of Cases_ l
if1
:4,»
-:"?,;- The Report analyzes the on
bases which WSPF decided whether
ii .
2»
&#39;.:*_;
to charge persons and particular
what charges bring.
to
K.
&#39; &#39;,r
$1,-&#39;1 ; The case involving the burglary of the office of Dr. Fielding,
.. Il_.
.r__._-V
"5
J a_.- Daniel Ellsberg&#39;s
psychiatrist, is used as an example to
a
describe the factual and legal considerations that led re-
to
jection of certain chargesand the decision to bring others -
2"
v =
.1 ..
&#39;2.
- 1;
J
q- I
.2
if4
.11-
1" -,.»+
i&#39;|&#39;
F
ft
_,
5&#39;?
1 |.
5.X
92-
~.*
*. 1
5. -6
.,.
*3
,-r. _.&#39;i&#39;
-_r-
.3
5?
.:.t;-
_
l&#39;
., :3
J1-
.53
Y1
.&#39;_|_
»a
J gs
-.1
A
ar
2;! . 92. ~»-
F

.&#39;~ ,n._ -7 -
573$
&#39;:*e
.*. =
.325.- #1-
.321.A The Report describes the issues the Special Prosecutor
,3?
-ei
a; - faced indeciding whether to bring perjury charges and whether
I 1:
,, n
.. to invoke federal
the conspiracy in
statute those where
cases
ET
.==.
:&#39;
. 4 3.5.
1
it appeared to be applicable.
3.,-.
-&#39;.;&#39;£
.-r- " - "
; as The Report also explains why
instead of using the ndnimum
E is
1
.at1* required standard of proof for a
ah ;v&#39;v
.
W. Special Prosecutor sought to use
_}&#39;.
.
=2 -=12,
ii ;£_92-
.-&#39;
&#39;=-.1,
.&#39; an
I. vi x.-,
wry
ih -&#39;-Ii":
&#39;
< r-
_-_,»a. -

_k -,.
l . .&#39;
>
Ii.
&#39;-. <

-a AH &#39;_
..-
Tr
*.._:
-1-»-

-a
~@
.a: _" -
.1"-&#39;
,i
&#39;
.
:
=5: .
L" 1
is
s
7" /.92
_. 3;
_&#39; 9-
4.
r
=._. 7
aw
_;
K..
-.-_
1" ,.s
iv .
_.-,
92. "A
,5:v
-&#39;1&#39;
_
.-0, .-&#39;1
-! .&#39;;
; /.5r
I
#5
&#39;92 -7.
4?; i
&
53
ii
.. __q .
&#39;, 4-. &#39;
"..1~1
F J
:
If-4&#39;1
1%
:923:f.§.
5.?
- ._;@_.r
1%:i
~.&#39;!&#39;=
ii
._
2%
1! ._
1;
7°. is
:5- Iii
ti
&#39;1
1-ti-5 ,-
.&#39;
vi ,:r,
E
$5
&#39;g
4.
$1
W;V
II?
1-».
aiii* .> {&#39;9
;_._.
.3!- - 3 _
.92-92
aw
It ;
wff»;
.e The Report describes Special Frosecutor Cox&#39;soffer
of
.1;
?Q
leniency to corporations which volunteered information about
"5!
1-- tp.
.- § their violations of the campaign financing laws. The reasons
fa
3% for Cox&#39;spolicy, which was adhered to by
each succeeding
L-ea Special Prosecutor, are described in full in the Report and
>+ S
include_proof difficulties, prior lack of enforcement and

$9 corporate disclosure of prior practices. The volunteer policy

?E resulted in guilty pleas l2

by corporations and 10 corporate
1"

&#39;~&#39;; officers. These pleas, and others that followed in the campaign
4.1.

4% ~.§=
1.
5..
as

6&#39;
.
__._.1___£I__-.__&#39; _.
uuutriouciuns area,
__-__ ____1
marxéu
I 1
4
1"
4
>1 we. !
n } "Q
as
1; 3,: _9 -
.,1 In 1-&#39;0&#39;!
- f H,
+:_-
"
_,.,
-1, »-- :__.

. as
: 3&#39;1
contenders. In a few
other situations the Special Prosecutor
.* , iii
>1?
;_:11
1i. "s
&#39;.¢
,1
+&#39;?.=&#39;3
3.3 n-a was willing to
accept guilty
pleas that did not fully meet
.~.
E: ;.
-. 12$
f§§I these concerns, and the_Report sets out the range of considera-
.1;_.
1- &#39;
tions that led to the
acceptance of such pleas.
Q,
.|1,, The Report also notes that in considering
a plea agree-
T15"
! &#39;53-
R .
&#39;9- ment, WSPF was concerned that where subordinates had been
_.
&#39;
;.-L"Er --
&#39;-
92 convicted and sentenced, the principle of proportionality
" &#39;7;
&#39;§.-
{Z
ii ~.-:-s
"iv; ** J §
_92.2%? .
prevented accepting a plea to
a lesser charge from
a person
~s§
,.&#39;-;1§a
Q- . who had directed his criminal activities.

IMajor Investigations
andQtherActionsChapter
3!
The most important work of WSPF s five task forces and
.. .
Iv
the counsel&#39;s
office is summarized in Chapter
3 of the Report.
ii-.92-;
5&#39;:-.
.3
5-:1:
Not included are large numbers of investigations
which
t -5;
&#39;
,5
.,?.z
. _ §
involved
a relatively minor commitment of office resources and
.&#39;~"
$-
" =: .
52+ Fe
a lesser number of investigations, requiring more substantial
.&#39;§-
1... ..,_
:- &#39;1&#39;-Y: efforts,
which have not been publicly disclosed in the past
-
.b
2;
_t
and which did not result in charges. Reporting them would
.-. 1,
publicize, for the first time and inan improper forum, allega-
,.

_ 92
4. tions from which the prosecutors concluded they should not
as
;+.-.
.__. .-1
,.
"{: I&#39;I-
l .,
.W initiate court action for the various reasons cited in
~-&#39;=:
3
if
vi K-2
er. cv-
. :_ .:_,.
. .1
Chapter2. In the investigationsincludedwithin this chapter,
1+ *3. i?
.31? allegations are cited if they have already received extensive
14$

<1.,
=
publicity or if they had
become public through court proceedings,
.--I ._
~r
&#39;..&#39;7F
&#39;
legislative inquiries or other forums.
-r

:
 ..;&#39;_&#39;
. $.14
.

_-1.
-
1".- !4_
i .&#39;L
$ ~
.. 1.: Q , _§ .
92,_
-:- 5 ;-.-
-- 2"s
=
-,,~-._
_. -r.
. ,&#39;r
2/-&#39;4 3 !
:4; 7! I
:1as;
J&#39;- .
5?»;

i
9;"
I5?
.-"&#39; 9292""&#39;92_
Ks &#39;5 "R.-r
e
£3:- .5"
1- 10 -

5.1. .33
-" : ,.
__ M .
.&#39;~;&#39; 5"&#39;; :
Asection of the work of the Watergate Task Force briefly
__._L&#39;
,.4
.:
_. -
._*
.f
describes its three investigations. The Watergate cover-up
Tr» 2&#39; investigation resulted in the prosecution and felony conviction
,g$§g
. -1 .&#39;~¢=_". of eight men formerly associated with the White House or the
- - _-. -.
&#39;.;-;.
;&#39;-=57
- 112-
$1
F; President&#39;s CampaignComittee. On January 15, 1974, apanel _
_ 1,
3s,
"-92-
... _-2? of tapes experts appointed Judge
by Sirica concluded that
*5 *7!

. H_ an 18 1/2 minute gap in asubpoenaed Presidential tape

. p@- recording of June 20, 1972 had been produced at

by five
least
dis
=$&#39;e separate hand operations of the stop and record buttons of a
~e»e
st: Uher 5000 machine, the same model used by
the President&#39;s
4 secretary, Rose Mary Woods, in transcribing the tape. Since
fr
. .; the experts report made it clear that the gap had been
caused
1, 4 ;
;-:&#39;-&#39;w
. .L intentional
by erasures, and evidence produced at earlier
A; §
-: hearings showed that the erasures had occurred after the tape .
2-
:&#39;.;.&#39;
~
cs had been
subpoenaed, Judge Sirica had referred the matter to
v-.. 2. _
w&#39;
.;-asv.;_ 1}
&#39;.-,&#39;¥ the grand jury for further investigation of the possibility
3Q-2;_ AI: 4921-and-~n-.1-56--Q
I&#39;-
.i,_: &#39;
en -KI-I. 92JUDLLlJL|L-Lilli an Of justice. Agrand 3.553.512
jury,
&#39;.!
--. .; <_
V .=&#39;
fa
, 3*
__K&#39;; _. -.i,_
...-5| .
.9292 -

I
.1
" :2:
§i@§
J%TXi
4.
I

er
Q
IV»-
__
&#39;;
15=
...,:;

5%
Q .&#39;_-1-I
1ll?
.4
op .m
1:"r;
.,
_.,:._ .$
11."
us...
*1 0
_ if £3
"I
.5?-.ii
-1. f;1
.1&#39;0&#39;
£3
1-
&#39;£.§
QQ $-
as =
.p
G_ vi
_92
.._.-1

.. r
5 :-
%
;=~r-&#39;

#-
92
f.-1
1.1 as
-75&#39;.
an.ns.
:14-_
e+ -.1&#39;4.
-.
sg-&#39;~
1;
.,r§§ ?
&#39;
;~gJ
% figs
is $
_ ¢ r £ .~.
-1
, so
E----_-92 __ ?11 _H
F31

&#39;-£2 ?
&#39;
.1
5.
April
Committeeon 1974.
30, Comparison
of the President&#39;s
:. .i
.1- . &#39;
Z.
&#39;-92.§ with
submission transcripts in WSPF&#39;s that
possession showed
Q1
. I,
_5 . the President&#39;s
version contained several omissions of por-
1.!_
- tions of conversations. After an investigation, WSPFconcluded
,1P &#39;_&#39;
G.-1-1
&#39;
_;. that there is strong circumstantial that
evidence some
at least
Q .1.
I if
i of the lengthy were
deletions deliberate, no
but prosecution
I-
0 ;¢
1:5.
3.| -&#39; ; was possible for reasons outlined in the Report.
.;_3-
~%-é.

-2..-
-
The Report also the
describes work of WSPF s "Dirty

&#39;2.-if
Tricks"
1, -.
. ~81.
-r
task force.
resulted in convictions
The "Dirty
of Donald
Tricks"
Segretti
investigation,
and Dwight
which
Chapin,
"Q
,-
A from
sprung that
reports President Nixon&#39;s
re-election cam-
"7:li.
}--&#39;5
1"
.1: 1- -&#39; paign had included an undercover network of agents who had
&#39;3
&#39;#!
:¢.92_,.
~ &#39;-| engaged in various kinds of political espionage and sabotage
 ..92
<.
.3-q..
I
.I n
1.14...
-r
,-
92.. »-Q . :3

Li
.>
f&#39;.:.s-
_-5

eé
_
-p;..

:-&#39;._
; . .%
V
..__.
5-,
35»
L-.
-&#39;_.I
1
J
3.»;
92 :51-
-&#39;£=
.
; &#39;1-
I
-&#39;- L1.
. .g, .
...;&#39;l*
-J
,- ii
&#39;.
.1,» -F ;_&#39;
&#39;5
s.;E
1:?
4-,;
...:.1

£1"
.5 -5"<-
ft"
1&#39;8
&#39;11
,C ?} -2:!
._; J
-_;:&#39;. - 12 -
5
.92_
3! -*1 0 -
;. r&#39;
.4 :
rs
&#39;
.L ITT
WSPF&#39;s task force investigated allegations that the
3
-

.1
Department;of
Justice three
hadsettled antitrust
suitsin
a -.
92&#39;.:
5
lQ7l against International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation
__?.
|.
. -&#39;5&#39;"
-s
12.
one
ITT!, the
of largest conglomerates,inreturn
Nation&#39;s
if
ITT&#39;s
for alleged offer to help finance the 1972 Republican
E ._, V:
.
LR
National Convention. These investigations included the

.53 g.1- that

possibility perjury had been committed in the 1972
,4 1
jj
:1.
T.
:1
F
confirmation hearings of Richard Kleindienst to become Attorney
v; $-
;-+&#39;:
.--iii. 92-.92.&#39;
... E _-*..1_ General that
and an allegation a Securities and Exchange
i we
v,1.-.
5% ii - Comission SEC! inquiry had been obstructed by ITT s failure
4,.M&#39;
IA.
produce
to certain The
documents. Report sumarizes these
 ¢
. gw.
.;._
. ,1.
r .=3&#39;
w
g__=.
- "v<
~¢

:1.
P&#39;
z
_.,1
92.-.j&#39;
: P
:1,
.1:.92.
4
as
=+.,
5&#39;
. . .i
?=¬
fa. is
.. }_

1- #&#39;
if1-&#39;~
-rO-u Q
._-_,K J
_i
..
3!:
15
;-I

.:&#39;
.. . ,_,
--&#39;».
.-
_,,».*,_~
-f.&#39;:£?_
I7
- I _ . ~CI} f{:!
.3Pu-I: - 13 -
__

J. The "Plumbers" task force investigated and prosecuted

.-

._. *:" . those responsible for

a break-in in September 1971 at the
1.,;_=.-
swrs*
4- .
Los Angeles
offices of Dr. Lewis Fielding, conducted to
secure
1
_._ _..
51?".
the psychiatric
records of Fielding s former patient, Daniel
fif.
¢ _. Ellsberg. At the time of the break in, Ellsberg was under_
&#39;5.
=
. *i * * of the classified
5-_
-1? w !-
indictment for his role in the alleged theft
e
Eu
3&#39;-.
"Pentagon Papers." The
report recounts
that prosecution,
...4 _ .
-J ._I f
.1
which
resulted in the
conviction of sin individuals, and a
as--
, -
, ._

number of
other investigations undertaken
by WSPF&#39;s
"Plumbers."
:5, -.
-.
r>-
#3. These included investigations of other break~ins, a "national
- <-
- *5 .;&#39;.
1!: security" wiretap program, the alleged misuse of
federal
2,} 4,-1
&#39;l
3,3. w"..&#39;
1=, .. agencies, the alleged mistreatment of demonstrators, and an
.
~ L.
.1-E-"
5.3 -.
.
inquiry into President Nixon&#39;s
tax returns.
V&#39;.
¢_~-_
.
. The Report also details the work of the Campaign Contri-
, ..».&#39;_
.&#39;
_

Iat"

is

-ss
- =E
.-» Tl
 s.

._,_
?- £-
_;f §t_.

vi J
.&#39;~ 1-,

fi
is
.; My
*5
*3 - Ir
aft
2-.1.
. :17
... §&#39;
&#39;-I-"I,
...- 1.=__-3
Tr
E-
3,
3-.1,
.5-~17
5-
is:F

&#39;2,
.51;.
I» if-,&#39;,
21.:
w-&#39;
.V ,4"hi
=I
iii
*5
I:
"§
E;
X C - !
ii
F221
&#39;-,
$1
> . 92-
rs. - 14 -
s~
.4?
.&#39; ._ _;
I;
rY
_&#39;Jv
:1
=-;,,
is rdFF Associated Milk Producers, Inc., the "Townhouse" program, the
">%
--v, »..

ii"
wit
Hughes-Rebozo allegations and an inquiry into the National
?» 1&#39;!-&#39;.-..-.&#39;_...:..
_ _ _ T1 -3...-..._
I&#39;l,-..-..--_-2|-J-.-...
_
I-1-Lbkldll-LL ; £&#39;J.lld.IlLZB 92.:UL1|.l1l1.l..L.t:l-.:- -Ll],
T I-Al-111 n
_|92d92I92d92092I:
LULIIL, I-1|-LJQLEI-1
nu-an 19211=
92J92J|-I-1-I-¢L|J|J
--,1-.
.92.
-- ".
&#39;<-
>.-r-
he
vEl

9 tions Task Force convicted 32 individuals 19

and corporations.
t u.
i
.-; J
.. 5.
_ Chapter 3 concludes with asummary of the work of -
t. >
I-i 2.
I_.
,,. "» WSPFI s legal task
issues force, the Office of Counsel to the
r
F- <1
r5 if: ,3. Special Prosecutor.
Hid
H &#39;;92
.
2-,:.
E fortsnto Obtain
Cfifst section! Evidence
iii C fromC it the_Hhite Chap.
izlwi C House 4,
ll
_§,,. .:.
F~21
&#39;92 From the first days of Special Prosecutor Cox&#39;s tenure until
n g_ .
*1
in
P
many months after President Nixon&#39;s resignation, much of WSPF&#39;s
2 ,;.
11$ energy and concern was devoted to acontinuing struggle with
-.1
r.
5. .
..
-.__
2&#39;

S
.2
,3. :r_.
.1»:
.. , g
;

F -8
In
:1;
-=
A&#39;- -.
&#39;-..
if?
.5; .&#39;.
r 4I
.&#39;
.1,
._._-I
75-1
.r_ _;.
&#39;1
..:~
&#39;; .
&#39;.._
Pf
.se 3% . . . >.
7;
fl
1-
J1-:3 . <0
14?
&#39;.
A5 _I. _15 _
if "&#39;
+_ /4
..- J. as
- !- Q
&#39;.- "5
...; i -1 , .8 .
5?. &#39;_
is H. jury&#39;s subpoena which led in October 1973 to Cox&#39;s dismissal
1. - V
~=1".
P1 .,.
are also described. The public uproar over Cox&#39;s
firing led
the President to agree
to comply with the subpoena, and the
.-&#39;»- .2
:r._. Report describes
the disclosurethat two of the tapes
were missing
.. __.A
f.
and one had an
18 l/2 minute gap and the
resulting investiga-
-_;-11
*
d _~
.92§_
tion. It details Special Prosecutor Jaw0rski&#39;s
continuing
r :-rk
:=¢
efforts to obtain additional materials and the issuance in
w
-:
.¢ _;- April 1974 of asubpoena for 64 tapes for
needed the Watergate

I-&#39;1 and
trial ensuing
the litigation resulting in the United
._ _=
-&#39;5
-ta.
1
States Supreme Court&#39;s unanimous decision on July 2Q, l97&,
T r.
.1:-&#39;.
requiring that these be
tapes turned over to the
Special
§ IE
.3
w:
&#39;
Y.- Prosecutor.
-as
92 . After President Nixon&#39;s resignation WSPF took
immediate
7.5
4 ,. action to prevent tapes and documents from the White House
,.s A.
@
a from being shipped to California and there ensued complex
2&#39;
ril
negotiations and litigation, described in the Report, resulting
» L,-
. -1
é in the Special Prosecutor&#39;s obtaining to
access the materials
.,_. if."
.-1&#39; he_believed he to
needed complete his task.
=;
rag; :11 Actions Related to President Nixon&#39;s PossibleCriminal
 1 92- :_
T
=5"Se?
-Y:
. ,,&#39;~I
~.

_i_.,
._
,,-IR
if v._- +5;
&#39;
:
, -..92.¢
;-92_
&#39;5
J"Fir
3?: .
@ §§
&#39;.I_r
"&#39;3
5- &#39;:
H
a§
g;._---.
_+ .~T J
__ A
.;__ _~.~
=
M1

.._. ._-.-_ A
ii.
;¢». - _

. -. .§__
»- - _-1 -&#39; --:1
Qlk ! if"

92
&#39;5"
.§ >-.;_.
.._5_ - 16
..._-_-.._92~-
.i, &#39;
i~_ . - &#39;
5
&#39;1 &#39;
,&#39;,.v
;_ -_-,.
&#39;_;.,
I l_
.4; -_ ,
.r _ .$
- in June, 1973 before the Senate
--if. the President in discussions of

gate burglar E. Howard Hunt and

P
SQ.
_-3
"a f -
1&#39; "hush money. Dean
in &#39;
_* xi . by the hatch 21, "
5&#39;?
..f4 .,_.

#
,9~-
l! ls 92
.,-"~ F&#39; 5&#39;?
i,as 1".
.;&#39;~l.
- . Select Committee implicating
"$1."
- £1 -. executive clemency for Water-
I7
.1.-
- the decision to pay Hunt

s version was corroborated and added to

5?
1,_,,, "Saturday night massacre"
,-:" J
af--2
The Report describes
.&#39;4. President Nixon could and shoul
.6;
.;-1&#39;
-:
.-1.?
-11:5
-Jf &#39;
1&#39;,

..-
-I.._-,=. . ..1»
3:7:__-~ --_ .&#39;.:
-_;&#39;
_,-92._-;~...~&#39;;;,=,192
4__*_ -.;.-.
.1 ".,___r---
- . -;-..92&#39;=-;_-_»
~-92-f
-_.".-V. U --Ly
;,
&#39;1-":_
~ &#39;-_0&#39;.
&#39;Y- .~ _- "I.
. -_;&#39;_
_,_ _.,,1-__1q
v ..2Z",*=¥-:-
4"-2._" ., -&#39;1.-=
.. x._;_
M-.-_
- .,v~.-:<.1,_»,-;
.- .;1-~.~&#39;"-cl
.&#39;.v§&#39;92f"3_~-J
&#39;_- &#39;7
-:_&#39;_15&#39;~l
_jj;j-;_.1_ .?--s;
_-;_tj.~_
_-."-..&#39;-9:4
&#39;-,
,1
1 #."==7}5
&#39;_- -.j&#39;_-_
Ln-~, L2
,
=:3.&#39;-
H.,.
*-e~&#39;--L-
»- T ;8.1+.-=i2:a£.-<=.&#39;;.:&#39;f-5-LP-1-1;!-1.1;.-&#39;3.&-=;-2.1
_._
-I-_ _ . *"* *
_&#39;
., _ ~
*5-_..:a-........3....
- V
. ~&#39;-&#39;
--"- _-" ~ - rt...
&#39;
-
... *"7-1"f
"
-= 1=;:"...:.
~?--_-
* 4..
r4_--.- .~ -
K .. . ei . _- -. .-: 2 -= - -- "K,...,.-i. _.
._ .,_ -_ .-. .- .&#39;
- &#39; -.. ; .-... -.__.
..-.- ...&#39;.
.-- -&#39;.
1.- . - &#39; J &#39;
.. .--I i.--=.¢*1&#39;:--- &#39;5". 4
I-B:
--&#39;- 1..
--- *1: . , , ~
, ~--"
.- - F _, >- &#39;" ~1 &#39; " - .
&#39;
1_ - .;;P;3.§_-&#39;»92_
1&#39;1 E,§3-_.;?Z
.&#39;~:-1...-.;
- ,-~
I--1.E;
>" .I x - 1. r -&#39; .- q .&#39;
"
&#39;
&#39; . /J
. &#39;!?" .
2!.}; .1 --4 *&#39;
m 0
92 ~- .- .1» &#39; - -£.-_--?l .;..--1-
i&#39;~-
--_-M
92

"515 - &#39; *
ii" is .. ..
,_,::;-§,I."&#39;92
After President
1I__ Nixon resigned;
Special Prosecutors.Jawors
-"s &#39; ~. =¢-1%,. ; »_;
.
Q1 *1
;"&#39;iL&#39;
.._,_, .~"*&#39;~-
decided
$ T.
.Q_§¬ that any - .;possible
he would
defer . .-- .-
ac§it"on I_agy
criminal
..-__-; . -;=;
the former
President until
the Watergate
cover-up jury
-- &#39;
3. gj|;{...____.._.~T_:,
g_. _sequestered
- :;§". =;-
,
and
the_ trial . had_-_started.
--
His
, .-
purpose
was
,.._.,_ . *""&#39;
5~"""&#3
- ._ __ A_- . - -~.- i &#39;
f&#39;-
"~-*-Ir".-r"";-"""&#39;"
?= .&#39;"
-&#39;
. j*. .-.
.2 avoid
.&#39;
&#39;
- exposing
.- the jurors
_to__
-.&#39;=*- additional
preetrial
-.- - s.publ_icitxj;_
."i.. ;-.1~.&#39;~:-2-:;.*.
-1,-_.-_._The
of this
result
decision
that Nixon, ifcharged _wit_h&
was
.-.f§_92-&#39;~
i= -&#39;_
_ .0
complicity in- the
Watergate cover-up, would
have been
tri &#39;
ed:;;l1--§§
F ¬: 7 ;&#39;-
-_
1&#39; t;"__&#39;
, ;&#39; .- .".~&#39;."
ch &#3I;-if . ._ ......5.;_-.
- j.<v_
*~ f
t -J; .
--- &#39;
separately
__ Haldeman,
g
from Ehrlichman
Mitchell,
the otheI:
and
i__,. -
_ _ . . . &#39;
.-
1-_2-; Ialleged
~92;-..&#39;-+,__g§_
,
co-conspirators originally
.-
charged. - - - = &#39;&#39;
-
-= ": P; ;:> . .&#39; ». -
- ; . The Report
describes Jaworski&#39;s
meeting withPhillip
_Buchen,
&#39;
Counsel President
to in
Ford, which the
Special p,:F-;
K; 1. . _Prosecutor
told Buchenthat thepre-trial publicity
_ _ ..a delay ofat
least 9to 12 monthsbeforea jurycould
be
&#39;
-" -_
&#39;selected
_- &#39; and
at which
he gave Mr.Buchen list
a of ten -
-
.&#39;_;;. -- ters pending beforeWSPF
"may
which _&#39;
prove to have some ~ -&#39;.-V.-Q ?
_};*- .-,: .- ~-. .- - c- ,- .V
- &#39;
-1%.
*1,; .connectionto activities in which
Mr. Nixon ispersonally :1. .;.<
- *
5&#39;-.3
--
-_. --
_5-T1V°1Ved,"but
as towhich
WSPF lacked evidence
of aprobable-1.-..;.
*7 ~if W
~-1* ~-.5;5 " -
:7 _- _.-_,
&#39;
- ="&#39;_
. .&#39; vii "-: wv
.r&#
s1&#39;
. 21-
~ »M
~I - - - - s c1&#39; &#39;
~- &#39;"
= &#39;
-- .==- &#39;
_v
- &#39;
7%;,:_92,.__
-. .&#39;
gqmi-_-.
-- -F1 3 -:12"
_., :1 On September
,. 8, President
.--. ,. &#39; &#39;
Ford
r- -. - &#39;
pardoned
- -92&#39;
&#39;
Mr. Nixon."
&#39;
-_" - ." &#39;" - ,-
r-r- ,""_?"
-I J-1!-_ -=51
~
--id 7 i__
;_i__-5;. :?"October
I _pe_c SMi
12 aPlrosecutor
P V aworsRiwrote
&#39;
&#39;
&#39;
&#39;
Attorney -"

-
___ S xbe8letter accompanying resignation
his inwhich
he e2I:?¬
. .%&#39;:
*&#3
&#39;".
: I -. -. ._
__ _-._ his plained reasons, included
in the Report, fornot" &#39
gf-/»"
--1.. - Ha-....
.&#39;E;-If
92
»&#39;.--.-if-"_;
ff _ . II.- ""
;- -t" &#39;
.»-:~ the . Pardon.. _- .
T5-f:-,.-=1 A - -- -- ~-~.2 " -- .f~.;,_&#39;.-._
~ ~ *:. § T_;.- -- "SQ
!,~- _- ..&#39;-
-:».*-- -P --"~
.I&#39;r
1. .;_
, .-,...
-._
l--- &#39;1 ti. _»
-er --""-rJw-.1 92 --..=-
&#39;=-.~-
1&#39; My
I 1~%"~_s-sf, ..&#39;
, ».J.
, &#39; -.x
.&#39;*&#39;§§i*.
_&#39;
&#39;J- ~._&#39;i-
&#39;~&#39;
.¢,£
,&#39; P 1v Q .~==
.IC" . $1,+~.-.
7%-&#39;
_-5*
.~-1.&#39;
.._
.--&#39;-»=w&#3
.-&#39;.
"&#39;.&#39;-Y
1" -,-_-it-&#39;
,_ .=-1---&#3
_
--.&#39;~v-{$9.
Ȣ..= =..":
- 1i?
&#39;
-.»;.
.&#39-
._ *9
; Trab...
.:_,,_ _,;.i_..£92..-."..I
K"&#39;
.. .- _.-,,.
-.__.V.
:~ .-#- _*- ah -J}Elp_4
* 1,§i ,, §" 3&#39;"
.._
_,..
1 --.-~
,4
..-».
"V,~P
=-- . ._;&#39;=y;.-&#39;
.-. ._ .:--.-.
,.. :.-_
5, 2..
. .&#39;.
.._
¢ "--..:;&#39;.
.>-.- .-. ~-..
_., -
54 1-:
.&#39;- .....
_ .=-.- - 1A1-&#39;41.
._-92 ,--
.__.>
a I
1I._-.._-I- ,,.Q44
- " P;" -"-=~&#39;:»&# &#39;
.
. ,..
gn =*r.:._.1
.._,,_
I
.E
"- . ~- .-., &#39; " --..-.i--- -;?Zrr.
.1
.
..~.~w~..~1=~a-.-
,_a_ _., Q- ";.s*"-&#
<1 :i92§
&#39; _- A-,3
- - ,&#39;=L
..- _&#39;_
__;-.-._;;92
. - _ .-&#39;.,,_.=,;;,,-n.;_
-.&#39;;._,.11»;-~-
3&#39;.
..5. " "
>Q
_. . L¬
l 1t ., ,...;.,-....§;;
.. ._
3,,
W _ ,-.7
,.._.
__,..:,_.
_, i::,;92 .-_?;». .._<..;. :"_- ii- ~
Ci
-_. &#39;.._
- - -$5-&#39;1
_I.*1_ &#39;
,1;
-. r. ..
_ ,1. &#39; &#39;
.?»
&#39;
,
ix:
L, ., &#39;.=
.&#39;
-.I&#39;.-
-:_-.,.. _ .-.. . .&#39; .-» --. - - . .&#39;
.-1.. ..-
==- J. &#39;
- - __ s K .
I ~15--J ._ .4_n.!,.c£r
4*
-5 -1=" $
I? __:.*_.,:_.
s-JL&#39;15,.
-=$#"- J. ._
~W ,ék.__
$&#39;¬=§~?
.--&#39;- Z.
..$$9292-" _ _w aw___
V _H I ".-.=. _ V5-T.Tf3&#39;I:.
W i _ :.;§;_ ]L_.,&#39;,_._,:,.,1.M._.:,,F._T:.
.Q<?1-"&#39;=¥i"i9 __rT:yF!__§é?§Y-$7
W __ -,=§5 ,.._
-_~=""E&#39;:".&#39;-*"&#
fl2?.-45"
5&#39;-Y51?:-&#39;~
s&#39;§5- gr
-L
-. .-.&#39;;+.~_-
" L -1 é._ ._ __.:!._»_
;_:.=_,.»
-.:_<V-._~,._.-4:.._;,&#39;.;g_5__
~- -&#39;- -..-.". %:--..~_-:»;_..~_.1-r-_,_
<2-5-&#39;-1:-wt.
W §q:,4.¬:
- =o&#39;-Hr-~=*
:.0. : .92{-E..L¢;¥;._,:._i_=:-_
"&#39;-
1*-&#39;~ &#39;
-&#39;.3 _.,.i-.u~,_:-_=.:.
&#39; &#39; - . .,.I-=_.={:Ei,?:§?_?-=.-3.
:_
¢&#39;.._
92!F__,;1_,::-
:1-, 3-...__
>;§».;.;__.
:_.,.___L
__H..
._
 £
-Y
"" -1.
:1
1
P
.-&#39;
-s
"R
1,
:-&#39;>
-2-p"

SJ?
J-
! 92
.41.
J»
rs
&#39;.&#39;~&#39;~
,=.¢.?»
&#39;.
J1. 55
;_;;92F=
.7}-»
-"1
1. 1
7&#39;-2
.j:_ l&#39;
,,;=. ?&#39;i:.~
F,
... -5.17 .
..r
,1-&#39;I7_
-4 Z
1-2; &#39;

.bi
-J5.
92
F7-
35&#39;
92.
Qt
&#39; ilk
. V
.I".
-me »- - L I nrt H_, ,--....._,_-.._
_.,.. ., ,_ -
,1 -_-431
~r
7&#39;-:9»
1;;
.1 _&#39;
o ~
F, r 92 fj
rr-5&#39;
v$&#39;
. ,_~__
&#39;§
5&#39;2?
92l
I-
7*; 1. _=, ~ e. 0 Q
_i_
..-
:.¬_
&#39;A
cs
&#39;
k . -l8 - j f
-_¢ . 1&#39;
$92 s:~~
I . U
I

_ 92
._-_-,--
,.,__,.
"15-. In addition to the 154 pages in the main body of the
713&#39;
,I _
Report sumarized above, the Report included 13 appendices.
5 ,3!
:&#39;-Z5
-544 include
They acomplete status report of all handled
cases
Ii2 ¢_ £2
.5-P,
;~ f .
WSPF
by up to September 15, 1975, a detailed organizational
i. "55-.:
.."E&#39;."
1*
.92 " -.
history of WSPF, a description of the relationship of the &#39;
I:-Q
.513 T3 Special Prosecutor with the Attorney General and with various
?%:&#39;-
92
|;:{§;.
1
.&#39;,-I federal agencies and legislative comittees, a detailed
e.
LI-,.
.,, . 1&#39;
ii chronology of Watergate they
events as to
related WSPF&#39;s
fa .5
#2- work, and a comprehensive bibliography of the extensive public
f
..,
ii-
; materials relating to matters investigated WSPF.
by

P? -ti.. .:
£31 :1
&#39;5
.we "EA
=-._~&#39;-_%
*" _.
.__,
E.-4&#39;