Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [Book1.xlsx]Sheet1
Report Created: 06-11-2019 13:10:17
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.015 Seconds.
Iterations: 12 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegative
Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value Integer
$C$14 PRODUCTION RATE X1 0 0 Contin
$D$14 PRODUCTION RATE X2 0 4.2829443447 Contin
$E$14 PRODUCTION RATE X3 0 45.121723519 Contin
$F$14 PRODUCTION RATE X4 0 72.327468582 Contin
$G$14 PRODUCTION RATE X5 0 104.90197487 Contin
$H$14 PRODUCTION RATE X6 0 89.821184919 Contin
Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$J$20 STAMPING LHS 420 $J$20<=$L$20 Binding 0
$J$21 UPPER FINISHING LHS 1260 $J$21<=$L$21 Binding 0
$J$22 INSOLE STICHING LHS 840 $J$22<=$L$22 Binding 0
$J$23 MOLDING LHS 2100 $J$23<=$L$23 Binding 0
$J$24 SOLE-UPPER JOINING LHS 2100 $J$24<=$L$24 Binding 0
$J$25 INSPECTING LHS 799.342190305 $J$25<=$L$25 Not Binding 40.65780969
$J$26 NON-NEGATIVE(X1) LHS 0 $J$26>=$L$26 Binding 0
$J$27 NON-NEGATIVE(X2) LHS 4.2829443447 $J$27>=$L$27 Not Binding 4.282944345
$J$28 NON-NEGATIVE(X3) LHS 45.1217235189 $J$28>=$L$28 Not Binding 45.12172352
$J$29 NON-NEGATIVE(X4) LHS 72.3274685817 $J$29>=$L$29 Not Binding 72.32746858
$J$30 NON-NEGATIVE(X5) LHS 104.901974865 $J$30>=$L$30 Not Binding 104.9019749
$J$31 NON-NEGATIVE(X6) LHS 89.8211849192 $J$31>=$L$31 Not Binding 89.82118492
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Book1.xlsx]Sheet1
Report Created: 06-11-2019 13:10:17
Q7.
DECREASED PRESENT INCREASED
411.14082 420 533.5815474 FOR THIS RANGE OPTIMAL SOLUTION WONT AFFECT THE OPTIMA
SHADOW PRICE(STAMPING)
FOR EVERY 1 UNIT INC./DEC. IN BINDING CONSTRAINT, OBJECTIVE FUNCTION WILL INC./DEC BY 5.580179533.
Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase
$C$14 PRODUCTION RATE X1 0 0 18 0.05070018
$D$14 PRODUCTION RATE X2 4.282944345 0 23 0.083039285
$E$14 PRODUCTION RATE X3 45.12172352 0 22 0.100842737
$F$14 PRODUCTION RATE X4 72.32746858 0 20 0.25648415
$G$14 PRODUCTION RATE X5 104.9019749 0 18 6.260393168
$H$14 PRODUCTION RATE X6 89.82118492 0 19 0.572583906
Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase
$J$20 STAMPING LHS 420 5.580179533 420 113.5815474
$J$21 UPPER FINISHING LHS 1260 1.793895871 1260 15.4507772
$J$22 INSOLE STICHING LHS 840 0.255655296 840 72.56195965
$J$23 MOLDING LHS 2100 0.203375224 2100 29.90972919
$J$24 SOLE-UPPER JOINING LHS 2100 0.422262118 2100 20.14864865
$J$25 INSPECTING LHS 799.3421903 0 840 1E+030
$J$26 NON-NEGATIVE(X1) LHS 0 -0.05070018 0 71.75080312
$J$27 NON-NEGATIVE(X2) LHS 4.282944345 0 0 4.282944345
$J$28 NON-NEGATIVE(X3) LHS 45.12172352 0 0 45.12172352
$J$29 NON-NEGATIVE(X4) LHS 72.32746858 0 0 72.32746858
$J$30 NON-NEGATIVE(X5) LHS 104.9019749 0 0 104.9019749
$J$31 NON-NEGATIVE(X6) LHS 89.82118492 0 0 89.82118492
LUTION WONT AFFECT THE OPTIMAL SOLUTION, PROFIT MAY VARY
DEC BY 5.580179533.
Allowable
Decrease
1E+030
0.239247312
1.120253165
0.055429065
0.529761905
0.040500229
Allowable
Decrease
8.859180036
111.8007117
4.008064516
134.3521595
179.7068966
40.65780969
0
1E+030
1E+030
1E+030
1E+030
1E+030
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [Book1.xlsx]Sheet1
Report Created: 06-11-2019 13:22:17
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.016 Seconds.
Iterations: 12 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance %, Assume NonNegative
Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value Integer
$C$10 PRODUCTION RATE X1 0 0 Contin
$D$10 PRODUCTION RATE X2 4.2829443447 6.7001795332 Contin
$E$10 PRODUCTION RATE X3 45.1217235189 48.897666068 Contin
$F$10 PRODUCTION RATE X4 72.3274685817 74.556552962 Contin
$G$10 PRODUCTION RATE X5 104.901974865 100.44524237 Contin
$H$10 PRODUCTION RATE X6 89.8211849192 85.867145422 Contin
Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$J$16 STAMPING LHS 425 $J$16<=$L$16 Binding 0
$J$17 UPPER FINISHING LHS 1260 $J$17<=$L$17 Binding 0
$J$18 INSOLE STICHING LHS 840 $J$18<=$L$18 Binding 0
$J$19 MOLDING LHS 2100 $J$19<=$L$19 Binding 0
$J$20 SOLE-UPPER JOINING LHS 2100 $J$20<=$L$20 Binding 0
$J$21 INSPECTING LHS 800.057450628 $J$21<=$L$21 Not Binding 39.94254937
$J$22 NON-NEGATIVE(X1) LHS 0 $J$22>=$L$22 Binding 0
$J$23 NON-NEGATIVE(X2) LHS 6.7001795332 $J$23>=$L$23 Not Binding 6.700179533
$J$24 NON-NEGATIVE(X3) LHS 48.8976660682 $J$24>=$L$24 Not Binding 48.89766607
$J$25 NON-NEGATIVE(X4) LHS 74.5565529623 $J$25>=$L$25 Not Binding 74.55655296
$J$26 NON-NEGATIVE(X5) LHS 100.44524237 $J$26>=$L$26 Not Binding 100.4452424
$J$27 NON-NEGATIVE(X6) LHS 85.8671454219 $J$27>=$L$27 Not Binding 85.86714542
LP MAXIMIZATION
PALLAS SPORT SHOE COMPANY
PROFIT MAX
Z=18X1+23X2+22X3+20X4+18X5+19X6
Q1.
IF WE TAKE VALUES INTUTIVELY, WE WONT BE ABLE TO REACH THE OPTIMAL SOLUTION I.E. WE WILL END UP LOOSING ON PRO
OBJ. FUNCTION(PROFIT) 18 23 22 20
CONSTRAINTS:
STAMPING 1.25 2 1.5 1.75
UPPER FINISHING 3.5 3.75 5 3
INSOLE STICHING 2 3.25 2.75 2.25
MOLDING 5.5 6 7 6.5
SOLE-UPPER JOINING 7.5 7.25 6 7
INSPECTING 2 3 2 3
NON-NEGATIVE(X1) 1
NON-NEGATIVE(X2) 1
NON-NEGATIVE(X3) 1
NON-NEGATIVE(X4) 1
NON-NEGATIVE(X5)
NON-NEGATIVE(X6)
WE WILL END UP LOOSING ON PROFIT WHICH WE COULD HAVE RECEIVED BY STAYING IN FEASIBLE REGION
SPRINT ROCKET
X5 X6
100.445242 85.86715
18 19 6160.474
Q6.
FIRST CONSTRAINT IS STILL BINDING. THERE IS A POINT IN ADDING 5 MINUTES BECAUSE IT WILL HELP IN GENERATION OF EXT
LL HELP IN GENERATION OF EXTRA PROFIT