Professional Documents
Culture Documents
223
settled by colonists from Euboea and Boeotia, who drove out the aboriginal
Carians. As we know that the Carians worshipped Hector, this makes the chain
complete. W. C. F. A.
THIS is a very useful work, and sheds light on one of the most difficult questions
in regard to ancient monuments, namely the exact nature, purpose, and date of
archaistic sculptures. Mr, Hauser's method is exhaustive. He gives a detailed
description of the known reliefs of the neo-Attic school, beginning with those
which bear the signatures of Salpion, of Sosibius, and of Pontius, and proceeding
to the consideration of other reliefs which bear the same character as these. He
finds the most general character of these reliefs not in their affectation of the
style of any one period, for the style varies greatly, but in the paratactic principle
of their composition. Their producers seem to have had by them in stock the
schemes of figures taken from reliefs of various ages, and to have combined these
figures into new compositions without regard to unity or consistency. Of these
schemes many are due in the author's opinion to the invention of the toreutic
workers, more particularly to Calamis. Nor do the changes introduced by the
copyists of later ages in types originated by great masters appear to be more than
slight and superficial. ' Im Archaistischen mehr echt Altes steckt, als man
gewohnlich annimmt.' The main arguments on which this view is based are the
occurrence in the same composition of figures belonging to various periods and
schools of art, and the recurrence in reliefs representing quite distinct subjects of
figures identical in design, and bearing no satisfactory relation to the groups into
which they are introduced. Useful sketches of fifty of these recurring schemata
are engraved in the plates. Among the earliest of archaistic reliefs, Mr. Hauser
places those of the Corinthian puteal discussed by Prof. Michaelis in this Journal
(1885, p. 48, PI. INI., LVII.), which he regards as not really dating from early
times, but rather from the fourth century B.C. In the course of the work
Mr. Hauser has occasion to discuss a great number of ancient monuments, and to
glance at a multitude of archaeological problems : his remarks show great care as
well as boldness, and will be very welcome to those to whom the discrimination
of archaistic from archaic work is an attractive subject.
P. Q.