You are on page 1of 7

Research

Rapid report
NSP1 is a component of the Myc signaling pathway

Authors for correspondence: Pierre-Marc Delaux1, Guillaume Becard2,3 and Jean-Philippe Combier2,3
Jean-Philippe Combier 1
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin Madison, 219 Moore Hall, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA;
Tel: +33 (0)5 34 32 38 11
2
Email: combier@lrsv.ups-tlse.fr Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Vegetales, UMR5546, Universite de Toulouse, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan CEDEX, France;
3
CNRS, UMR5546, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan CEDEX, France
Guillaume B ecard
Tel: +33 (0)5 34 32 38 20
Email: becard@lrsv.ups-tlse.fr
Received: 3 April 2013
Accepted: 23 April 2013

Summary
New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65  Nodulation and arbuscular mycorrhization require the activation of plant host symbiotic
doi: 10.1111/nph.12340 programs by Nod factors, and Myc-LCOs and COs, respectively. The pathways involved in the
perception and downstream signaling of these signals include common and distinct components.
Key words: AM symbiosis, GRAS Among the distinct components, NSP1, a GRAS transcription factor, has been considered for
transcription factor, Medicago truncatula, years to be specifically involved in nodulation.
NSP1, SYM pathway.  Here, we analyzed the degree of conservation of the NSP1 sequence in arbuscular mycorrhizal
(AM) host and non-AM host plants and carefully examined the ability of Medicago truncatula
nsp1 mutants to respond to Myc-LCOs and to be colonized by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus.
 In AM-host plants, the selection pressure on NSP1 is stronger than in non-AM host ones. The
response to Myc-LCOs and the frequency of mycorrhizal colonization are significantly reduced
in the nsp1 mutants.
 Our results reveal that NSP1, previously described for its involvement in the Nod factor
signaling pathway, is also involved in the Myc-LCO signaling pathway. They bring additional
evidence on the evolutionary relatedness between nodulation and mycorrhization.

legume nodulation by Nod factors (Oldroyd et al., 2009).


Introduction
Following these early signaling events, the fungus contacts the
The arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis plays a key role in the plant root epidermis, develops hyphopodia and colonizes the root
nutrient uptake of a majority of land plants and could potentially be inter- and intra-cellularly. Finally, it forms highly branched
an important component of low input sustainable agriculture. The structures, called arbuscules, in cortical cells where the nutrient
establishment of this symbiosis involves signal molecules released exchanges between the two partners take place.
by both partners. The plant produces strigolactones, which are an To date, only two transcription factors of the Sym pathway,
ancient class of plant hormones that are also required for AM RAM1 and NSP2, have been identified as being involved in the
symbiosis (Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008; Myc signaling pathway (Maillet et al., 2011; Gobbato et al., 2012;
Delaux et al., 2012). At extremely low concentrations strigolac- Lauressergues et al., 2012). NSP2 is a GRAS transcription factor
tones stimulate AM fungal metabolism, germination and pre- also involved in the Nod signaling pathway. It interacts with NSP1
symbiotic growth (Akiyama et al., 2005; Besserer et al., 2006, and promotes the activation of symbiotic marker genes, such as
2008). The fungus releases lipochitooligosaccharides (Myc-LCOs) ENOD11 (Hirsch et al., 2009). NSP1 is another GRAS transcrip-
and short oligosaccharides (COs), which prepare the plant for tion factor which has been described as a specific component of the
symbiosis by activating a symbiotic (Sym) signaling pathway and Nod signaling pathway (Catoira et al., 2000; Smit et al., 2005). It
promoting lateral root formation (Maillet et al., 2011; Genre et al., has been proposed that RAM1 could play a role in mycorrhization
2013). The Sym pathway is also involved in the activation of similar to that of NSP1 during nodulation by interacting with

No claim to original French goverment works New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65 59
New Phytologist Ó 2013 New Phytologist Trust www.newphytologist.com
New
60 Research Rapid report Phytologist

NSP2 and activating symbiotic genes (Gobbato et al., 2012). surface-sterilized and germinated on agar plates in the dark for 5 d
However, the fact that nsp1 mutant is affected in the synthesis of at 4°C. The nsp1 B85 and C54 (Smit et al., 2005), nsp2-1 (Kalo
strigolactones (Liu et al., 2011) strongly suggests that NSP1 could et al., 2005), ram1-1 (Gobbato et al., 2012) and ipd3-1 (Horvath
also be involved in the early steps of the establishment of the AM et al., 2011) alleles were used. The plants were then cultivated in
symbiosis. 200 ml pots on Oil-Dri US-Special Substrate (Damolin, Den-
To test this hypothesis, we performed a phylogenetic study of mark) for 6–8 wk in a growth chamber and watered every 2 d with
NSP1 in plants and carefully examined the mycorrhizal phenotype Long Ashton medium containing 7.5 lM phosphate (Lauresser-
of the Medicago truncatula nsp1 mutant. We found that NSP1 is gues et al., 2012). For inoculation with R. irregularis, we used either
well-conserved in angiosperms across the AM host plants and is 400 or 1200 spores per liter of substrate.
more divergent in the non-AM host plants of the Brassicaceae
family. Also, NSP1 is required for optimum mycorrhization and is
Bioactive chemicals
involved in the Myc signaling pathway. Taken together, our results
show that NSP1 is not specific to the Nod signaling pathway. They Myc-LCOs used in this study are an equimolar mix of the four
bring additional evidence on the evolutionary relatedness between (Syn)Myc-LCOs: LCO-IV(C16 : 0), LCO-IV(C16 : 0,S), LCO-
nodulation and mycorrhization. IV(C18 : 1D9Z) and LCO-IV(C18 : 1D9Z,S) described in Maillet
et al. (2011) at a final concentration of 10 8 M. The plants treated
with Myc-LCOs (12 h) were cultivated on Fahraeus medium as
Materials and Methods
described in Combier et al. (2008), containing a low concentration
of phosphate (7.5 lM) and a high concentration of nitrogen
Phylogenetic analyses
(10 mM NH4NO3). Some plants were grown in the same
The NSP1 sequences of angiosperms, of the moss Physcomitrella conditions but treated with Nod factors of Sinorhizobium meliloti
patens and of the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii were collected (Lerouge et al., 1990) at a final concentration of 10 8 M. COs with
by BLASTp against the GenBank nr database (Supporting four residues (CO4) (Genre et al., 2013) were used at a final
Information Table S1). The gymnosperm sequences were obtained concentration of 10 8 M in the same conditions as Myc-LCOs.
by tBLASTn on the available ESTs. The Marchantia polymorpha
sequence was identified using the http://www.one-KP.com dataset.
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
In addition, the charophyte databases available on GenBank were
(qRT-PCR) analyses
also screened. The collected sequences were aligned using MAFFT
(http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/). The phylogenetic tree RNAs of Medicago truncatula roots were extracted using the
was generated by maximum-likelihood using MEGA5 as previ- RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). The reverse transcription (RT)
ously described (Delaux et al., 2012). AtSHR and AtSCL32 and was performed using the SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase
their orthologs in Gymnosperms, S. moellendorffii and P. patens (Invitrogen) on 500 ng of total RNA. For the experiment
were used as outgroups (Engstrom, 2011). The average pairwise comparing the mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots, six inde-
distances of the LHR domains were calculated between the pendent plants were analyzed per condition. For the experiments
Brassicaceae, AM host dicots and Carica papaya using MEGA5 with molecule treatments, ten independent plants were pooled per
after gap removal (Tamura et al., 2011). replicate. Three replicates (n = 3) were performed with two
technical replicates each. Each experiment has been repeated two
to three times. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
Estimation of x parameter
amplifications were conducted on a Roche LightCycler 480 System
The codon sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (codon) via (Roche Diagnostics) (see Lauressergues et al., 2012).
MEGA5. The gaps were automatically removed. The ratio of non-
synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site (dN) to
Statistical analyses
synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (dS), the x
parameter, was calculated using MEGA5. To determine the x The mean values of relative gene expression or mycorrhization rates
parameter in each branch of the NSP1 gene tree, a branch-specific were compared by using the Kruskal–Wallis test and, when
approach was conducted using codeml (Yang, 1998). The free-ratio significant, a pairwise comparison was made using the non-
and one-ratio models were generated as proposed by Yang (1998). parametric Mann–Whitney test. The error bars represent the
To determine the most likely model, twice the difference between standard error of the mean (SEM). The stars indicate significant
the log likelihood of each model was compared by Chi-square. For differences (P < 0.05).
the Chi-square test, df = number of branches in the free-ratio
model – 1.
Results and Discussion

Biological materials NSP1 is divergent in non-AM host species


Rhizophagus irregularis sterile spores were purchased from Agro- To address the question of the involvement of NSP1 in AM
nutrition (Carbonne, France). Medicago truncatula A17 seeds were symbiosis, we first looked at its conservation in the green lineage by

New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65 No claim to original French goverment works
www.newphytologist.com New Phytologist Ó 2013 New Phytologist Trust
New
Phytologist Rapid report Research 61

in silico analysis. Indeed, most of the AM symbiosis-related genes it is a non-Brassicaceae member of the Brassicales order and can
are well conserved in land plants and poorly conserved or absent in form AM symbioses (Khade et al., 2010; Franzke et al., 2011).
the Brassicaceae, a non-AM host family (Delaux et al., 2013). We While no significant differences were found for the LHRII domain,
screened the available genomic data of land plants and chlorophyte the LHRI domain seems to be highly divergent in the Brassicaceae
green algae, the transcriptomic data of Gymnosperms and the compared to the other, AM host, dicots (Fig. 1c).
recently released transcriptomic sequences of charophyte green Most of the genes involved in the AM symbiosis have been lost in
algae (Wodniok et al., 2011; Timme et al., 2012) for the presence the Brassicaceae (Delaux et al., 2013). However, some of them are
of NSP1. We identified GRAS domain-containing proteins in land still present (DMI1 or NSP2 for instance) suggesting the occurrence
plants and charophyte green algae datasets but not in the of alternative functions that led to their conservation. The purifying
chlorophyte sequences. To assess their identity, the collected selection acting on NSP1 and NSP2 (x values < 1) argue for this
sequences were aligned and a maximum-likelihood tree was hypothesis. The involvement of these two genes in the regulation of
resolved. As previously determined by Engstrom (2011), we found the biosynthesis of the plant hormones strigolactones has been
clear orthologs of NSP1 in all the available angiosperm genomes recently demonstrated (Liu et al., 2011) and could explain their
and in the genomes of the Lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii and conservation. By contrast, some domains, LHRI in NSP1 or the
of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Fig. 1a). In addition, we found mir171 h-binding domain in NSP2 (Lauressergues et al., 2012),
orthologs of NSP1 in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha and in which are important for the symbiotic function, are more
the Gymnosperm Pinus taeda (Fig. 1a). By contrast, the GRAS divergent, likely due to a locally relaxed selection pressure.
domain-containing proteins found in the charophyte green algae Taken together, these analyses suggest that NSP1 appeared early
belonged to other clades of the GRAS family (data not shown). in the Embryophytes lineage and diverged in the Brassicaceae, an
To determine whether NSP1 is under different evolutionary evolutionary pattern shared with NSP2, another GRAS transcrip-
constraints in AM host and non-AM host species, we calculated tion factor of the Sym pathway.
several x values. The x value reflects the selection constraints
(Yang, 1998). We applied the pairwise comparison approach and
Mycorrhization and Myc-LCOs induce NSP1 expression
calculated the x values within the symbiotic dicots and the
Brassicaceae for NSP1 and four other GRAS transcription factors: NSP1 is known to play a role during nodulation (Smit et al., 2005)
SCARECROW (Di Laurenzio et al., 1996), SHORTROOT (Benfey and the Medicago gene atlas (http://mtgea.noble.org/v2/) reveals
et al., 1993), PAT1 (Bolle et al., 2000) and NSP2 (Kalo et al., that NSP1 expression is induced during this symbiosis. Interest-
2005). We found that, for NSP1 and NSP2, the x value of the ingly, the Medicago gene atlas also reveals that NSP1 expression is
Brassicaceae is significantly (P < 0.001) higher than that of the AM slightly induced in mycorrhizal roots. We first confirmed by qRT-
host dicots (Fig. 1b). By contrast, the x parameters of PCR that the expression of NSP1 is slightly (two-fold compared to
SCARECROW and PAT1 are higher (P < 0.001) in the symbiotic the control) but significantly induced during mycorrhization
dicots than in the Brassicaceae (Fig. 1b). For SHORTROOT, the x (Fig. 2a). In parallel, by analogy with the role of NSP1 in the Nod
parameters are similar in both groups (Fig. 1b). Then, to take into signaling pathway, we investigated whether the expression of NSP1
account the evolutionary rate of the most common ancestor, we could be induced by a mixture of sulfated and non-sulfated Myc-
performed a branch-specific analysis on NSP1. In this approach, LCOs. We found, under conditions of high nitrogen fertilization
two models are compared: one which assumes the same x for all the (10 mM NH4NO3), which inhibits the Nod signaling pathway
branches (one-ratio) and the other which assumes a different x (Fig. S1), that NSP1 expression is induced by the Myc-LCO
parameter for each branch in the tree (free-ratio). We found that the treatment (Fig. 2b). Moreover, this induction is still present in the
free-ratio model fits the data significantly better than the one-ratio ram1 and nsp2 mutants but not in the ipd3 mutant (Fig. 2b),
model (P < 0.001). In this model, the branch of the tree at the base suggesting that the induction of NSP1 expression by Myc-LCOs
of the Brassicaceae lineage displays a x value (x = 0.5165) higher requires IPD3, which acts upstream of NSP1 (Horvath et al., 2011)
than the x value of the symbiotic dicot branch (x = 0.1750). These but is independent of RAM1 and NSP2. The high expression of
results obtained with the pairwise and the branch-specific NSP1 in the non-treated ipd3 mutant was not expected but may
approaches suggest that a relaxed selection constraint occurred on suggest the occurrence in the wild-type plant of some negative
NSP1 in the non-AM host Brassicaceae family. feedback regulation by IPD3 of the expression of downstream
Proteins of the GRAS family contain five domains (LHRI, genes. Interestingly, we found no induction of NSP1 expression by
VHIID, LHRII, PFYRE and SAW) which are well-conserved in treatment with CO4 (Fig. S2), confirming that the symbiotic
each sub-clade of the family (Engstrom, 2011). The two LHR signaling pathways induced by Myc-LCOs and COs are distinct
domains are required for the binding of NSP1 to the promoter of (Genre et al., 2013).
MtENOD11, a gene upregulated during the early steps of AM and
root nodule symbioses (Boisson-Dernier et al., 2005; Hirsch et al.,
Mycorrhization is affected in the Mtnsp1 mutant
2009). To determine the impact of the relaxed selection constraint
on NSP1 in the Brassicaceae, the LHR domains of angiosperms The screening for mutants affected in the AM symbiosis was
were aligned. Then, we calculated the pairwise distance of the LHR initially performed with strong fungal inoculants: a high number of
domains of the Brassicaceae and of the symbiotic dicots to the LHR spores or fragments of mycorrhized roots. By using a smaller
domains of Carica papaya. We used C. papaya as reference because inoculum (fewer spores), NSP2, which was initially identified as

No claim to original French goverment works New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65
New Phytologist Ó 2013 New Phytologist Trust www.newphytologist.com
New
62 Research Rapid report Phytologist

(a)

(b)
Fig. 1 The evolution of NSP1 in land plants.
(a) Maximum-likelihood tree of NSP1. (b)
Pairwise estimation of x values in the
Brassicaceae family (Bra) and in the arbuscular
mycorrhizal (AM) host dicots (AM host) for
NSP1, NSP2, SHORTROOT (SHR), PAT1 and
SCARECROW (SCR). Asterisks indicate a
significant difference according to the Mann–
(c)
Whitney test (P < 0.001). (c) Pairwise distance
comparison of the LHR domains (I and II) of
Carica papaya to the same LHR domains of the
Brassicaceae family (Bra) and of the AM host
dicots (AM host). ***, Significant difference
according to Student’s t-test (P < 0.001); ns,
not significant. Accession numbers and species
names are available in Supporting Information
Table S1.

exclusively involved in nodulation (Oldroyd & Long, 2003), was probably non-essential, suggesting an overlapping function,
recently found to be also involved in the AM symbiosis and to be a perhaps with other GRAS proteins.
member of the common Sym pathway (Maillet et al., 2011). We
first inoculated the Mtnsp1 B85 allele and wild-type plants with a
Nsp1 participates in the Myc-LCO signaling pathway
high number of spores (1200 spores per liter). In this condition, the
mutant and wild-type plants were similarly colonized (Fig. 3a). To further investigate the mycorrhizal phenotype of the Mtnsp1
However, with a smaller fungal inoculum (400 spores per liter), the mutant, we looked at whether NSP1 is involved in the Myc
mycorrhization of Mtnsp1 mutant plants was significantly reduced signaling pathway. For this purpose we tested the effect of Myc-
compared to the wild-type after either 6, 8 or 12 wk post- LCOs on the expression of four symbiotic marker genes: ENOD11
inoculation (Fig. 3a). The colonization rate in the mutant plants (Boisson-Dernier et al., 2005) and three genes known to be up-
was two- to three-fold lower than in the wild-type plants (Fig. 3a– regulated in Medicago truncatula roots treated with Myc-LCOs
c), while in the colonized root sections the frequency and the (Mtr.52092.1.S1_s_at, Mtr.37912.1.S1_at and Mtr.35524.1.S1_at,
structure of the arbuscules were the same (Fig. 3b). In addition to which encode for a putative pectinesterase, a NADP-dependent
the B85 Mtnsp1 allele we tested the Mtnsp1 C54 allele (Smit et al., oxidoreductase, and a member of the subtilase family, respectively;
2005) for its ability to get colonized. As for B85 we found a reduced Maillet et al., 2011; Lauressergues et al., 2012). To make sure that
colonization rate in Mtnsp1 C54 (Fig. 3c), confirming the the Myc rather than the Nod signaling pathway was activated,
requirement of NSP1 for a proper AM symbiosis. These results Mtnsp1 and wild-type plants were treated for 24 h with
suggest that NSP1 has a role in mycorrhization, but the protein is non-sulfated Myc-LCOs. These LCOs are the most remote to

New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65 No claim to original French goverment works
www.newphytologist.com New Phytologist Ó 2013 New Phytologist Trust
New
Phytologist Rapid report Research 63

(a) (a)

(b)

(b)

Fig. 2 NSP1 expression during arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis. (a)


Quantification of NSP1 expression by qRT-PCR in non-inoculated (MYC–)
and inoculated roots (MYC+) of Medicago truncatula with Rhizophagus
irregularis and cultivated for 9 wk (n = 6 independent plants). (b)
Quantification of NSP1 expression by qRT-PCR in wild-type (A17) and
mutant lines treated or not with 10 8 M of a mixture of sulfated and non-
sulfated Myc-LCOs (n = 3 independent pools of 10 plants). Error bars (c)
represent standard error of mean (SEM); *, significant difference between
the two treatments according to the Mann–Whitney test (P < 0.05).

the cognitive Nod factors of Medicago whose sulfate group is


essential to activate the nodulation process (Lerouge et al., 1990).
In wild-type plants expression of these genes was up-regulated by
non-sulfated Myc-LCOs, except for ENOD11, which was previ-
ously known to be non-inducible by these molecules (Maillet et al.,
2011) (Fig. 4). By contrast, treatment with non-sulfated Myc-
LCOs did not affect the expression level of these genes in Mtnsp1
mutant plants (Fig. 4). To strengthen this result, wild-type and
Mtnsp1 plants were grown on a medium supplemented with Fig. 3 Mycorrhizal phenotype of the Mtnsp1 mutant. (a) Percentage of
10 mM NH4NO3. This concentration is sufficient to inhibit plant colonization in the roots of wild-type Medicago truncatula A17 and nsp1 B85
response to Nod factors (Fig. S1). The plants were then treated for allele inoculated with 400 or 1200 spores per liter of Rhizophagus irregularis
12 h with a mixture of sulfated and non-sulfated Myc-LCOs. The and cultivated for 6, 8 and 12 wk (wpi, week post-inoculation). (b)
Quantification of mycorrhization in wild-type A17 and nsp1 B85 allele
four genes were up-regulated in wild type plants after treatment 12 wk after inoculation according to Trouvelot et al. (1986). ‘F’, the
with Myc-LCOs (Fig. S3). By contrast, their induction was frequency of colonization in the root system; ‘a’, the arbuscule abundance (in
abolished in the Mtnsp1 mutant plants, confirming that NSP1 is percentage) in the colonized root sections. (c) Percentage of colonization in
required for the normal response of the plant to Myc-LCOs. Once the roots of wild type (A17) and two alleles of nsp1 mutants (B85 and C54),
gene expression and plant responses activated by tetrameric and 8 wk after inoculation. Error bars represent standard error of mean (SEM).
*, Significant difference when compared with control according to the
pentameric chitin oligomers (CO4/CO5, Genre et al., 2013) will Kruskal–Wallis test (n = 6, P < 0.05).
be described, similar experiments can be performed to investigate
the role of NSP1 in CO-induced signaling pathway.
While RAM1 seems to be required for the penetration of the NSP1 and NSP2 activate genes involved in the biosynthesis of
fungus (Gobbato et al., 2012), NSP1, like NSP2 (Lauressergues strigolactones (Liu et al., 2011), this control might require local
et al., 2012), seems to control the fungal colonization in the root. As adjustments of strigolactone content.

No claim to original French goverment works New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65
New Phytologist Ó 2013 New Phytologist Trust www.newphytologist.com
New
64 Research Rapid report Phytologist

(a) (b)

Fig. 4 The response of the nsp1 mutant to


non-sulfated Myc-LCOs (NS-LCOs). qRT-
(c) (d)
PCR analysis of the relative expression levels of
mycorrhization marker genes in response to
NS-LCOs in wild-type Medicago truncatula
A17 and nsp1 mutant roots. (a) ENOD11, (b)
Mtr.52092.1.S1_s_at, (c) Mtr.37912.1.S1_at
and (d) Mtr.35524.1.S1_at. Error bars
represent standard error of mean (SEM).
*, Significant difference between the two
treatments according to the Mann–Whitney
test (n = 3 independent pools of 10 plants,
P < 0.05).

When examining the lateral root formation of Medicago truncatula Benfey PN, Linstead PJ, Roberts K, Schiefelbein JW, Hauser MT, Aeschbacher
in response to Myc-LCOs, Maillet et al. (2011) found that this RA. 1993. Root development in Arabidopsis: four mutants with dramatically
altered root morphogenesis. Development 119: 57–70.
response was not dependent on NSP1. This result suggested that Besserer A, Becard G, Roux C, Jauneau A, Sejalon-Delmas N. 2008. GR24, a
NSP1 was not involved in the Myc signaling pathway. In light of synthetic analogue of strigolactones, stimulates mitosis and growth of the
our results here, showing that the nsp1 mutants are affected in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora rosea by boosting its energetic
mycorrhizal colonization and in the Myc-LCO induction of metabolism. Plant Physiology 148: 402–413.
mycorrhization marker genes, we hypothesize that the positive Besserer A, Puech-Pages V, Kiefer P, Gomez-Roldan V, Jauneau A, Roy S, Portais
JC, Roux C, Becard G, Sejalon-Delmas N. 2006. Strigolactones stimulate
induction by Myc-LCOs observed by Maillet et al. (2011) of both arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by activating mitochondria. PLoS Biology 4: e226.
mycorrhization and lateral root formation actually involves distinct Boisson-Dernier A, Andriankaja A, Chabaud M, Niebel A, Journet EP, Barker
signaling pathways. Together, these results suggest that NSP1 DG, de Carvalho-Niebel F. 2005. MtENOD11 gene activation during rhizobial
would be necessary to transduce the Myc-LCO promotion of infection and mycorrhizal arbuscule development requires a common AT-rich-
fungal colonization but not the Myc-LCO stimulation of root containing regulatory sequence. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 18: 1269–
1276.
development. Finally, as we know that both RAM1 and NSP1 Bolle C, Koncz C, Chua NH. 2000. PAT1, a new member of the GRAS family, is
interact with NSP2 (Hirsch et al., 2009; Gobbato et al., 2012), involved in phytochrome A signal transduction. Genes and Development 14:
future work will have to further investigate the respective role of 1269–1278.
each interaction during the fungal penetration of the root and, later, Catoira R, Galera C, de Billy F, Penmetsa RV, Journet EP, Maillet F, Rosenberg C,
during the fungal colonization and autoregulation of this coloni- Cook D, Gough C, Denarie J. 2000. Four genes of Medicago truncatula
controlling components of a nod factor transduction pathway. Plant Cell 12:
zation. 1647–1666.
Combier JP, de Billy F, Gamas P, Niebel A, Rivas S. 2008. Trans-regulation of the
expression of the transcription factor MtHAP2-1 by a uORF controls root nodule
Acknowledgements development. Genes and Development 22: 1549–1559.
Delaux PM, Sejalon-Delmas N, Becard G, Ane JM. 2013. Evolution of the plant –
This work was carried out in the Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences microbe symbiotic “toolkit”. Trends in Plant Science. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.
Ve ge tales in Toulouse, which belongs to the Laboratoire d’Excellence 01.008
entitled TULIP (ANR -10-LABX-41). The authors thank Fabi- Delaux PM, Xie X, Timme RE, Puech-Pages V, Dunand C, Lecompte E, Delwiche
enne Maillet (LIPM, Toulouse, France) for providing mutant seeds CF, Yoneyama K, Becard G, Sejalon-Delmas N. 2012. Origin of strigolactones in
and Nod factors, Eric Samain, Sebastien Fort and Sylvain Cottaz the green lineage. New Phytologist 195: 857–871.
Di Laurenzio L, Wysocka-Diller J, Malamy JE, Pysh L, Helariutta Y, Freshour G,
(CERMAV, Grenoble, France) for providing the Myc-LCOs and Hahn MG, Feldmann KA, Benfey PN. 1996. The SCARECROW gene regulates
Kari L. Forshey for critical reading of the manuscript. The authors an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization
would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable of the Arabidopsis root. Cell 86: 423–433.
comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. Engstrom EM. 2011. Phylogenetic analysis of GRAS proteins from moss, lycophyte
and vascular plant lineages reveals that GRAS genes arose and underwent
substantial diversification in the ancestral lineage common to bryophytes and
References vascular plants. Plant Signaling Behavior 6: 850–854.
Franzke A, Lysak MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Koch MA, Mummenhoff K. 2011. Cabbage
Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H. 2005. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal family affairs: the evolutionary history of Brassicaceae. Trends in Plant Science 16:
branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435: 824–827. 108–116.

New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65 No claim to original French goverment works
www.newphytologist.com New Phytologist Ó 2013 New Phytologist Trust
New
Phytologist Rapid report Research 65

Genre A, Chabaud M, Balzergue B, Puech-Pages V, Novero M, Rey T, Fournier J, Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5:
Rochange S, Becard G, Bonfante P et al. 2013. Short-chain chitin oligomers molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary
from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi trigger nuclear Ca2+ spiking in Medicago distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28:
truncatula roots and their production is enhanced by strigolactone. New 2731–2739.
Phytologist 198: 190–202. Timme RE, Bachvaroff TR, Delwiche CF. 2012. Broad phylogenomic sampling
Gobbato E, Marsh JF, Vernie T, Wang E, Maillet F, Kim J, Miller JB, Sun J, Bano and the sister lineage of land plants. PLoS ONE 7: e29696.
SA, Ratet P et al. 2012. A GRAS-type transcription factor with a specific function Trouvelot A, Kough JL, Gianinazzi-Pearson V. 1986. Mesure du taux de
in mycorrhizal signaling. Current Biology 22: 2236–2241. mycorhization VA d’un systeme radiculaire. Recherche de methodes d’estimation
Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, Puech-Pages V, Dun EA, Pillot JP, ayant une signification fonctionnelle. In: Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S, eds.
Letisse F, Matusova R, Danoun S, Portais JC et al. 2008. Strigolactone Physiologicalandgeneticalaspectsofmycorrhizae.Paris,France:INRAPress,217–221.
inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455: 189–194. Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, Akiyama K, Arite T, Takeda-Kamiya N,
Hirsch S, Kim J, Mu~ noz A, Heckmann AB, Downie JA, Oldroyd GE. 2009. GRAS Magome H, Kamiya Y, Shirasu K, Yoneyama K et al. 2008. Inhibition of shoot
proteins form a DNA binding complex to induce gene expression during branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455: 195–200.
nodulation signaling in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 21: 545–557. Wodniok S, Brinkmann H, Gl€ockner G, Heidel AJ, Philippe H, Melkonian M,
Horvath B, Yeun LH, Domonkos A, Hala sz G, Gobbato E, Ayaydin F, Miro K, Becker B. 2011. Origin of land plants: do conjugating green algae hold the key?
Hirsch S, Sun J, Tadege M et al. 2011. Medicago truncatula IPD3 is a member of BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 104.
the common symbiotic signaling pathway required for rhizobial and mycorrhizal Yang Z. 1998. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application
symbioses. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 24: 1345–1358. to primate lysozyme evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 568–573.
Kal
o P, Gleason C, Edwards A, Marsh J, Mitra RM, Hirsch S, Jakab J, Sims S, Long
SR, Rogers J et al. 2005. Nodulation signaling in legumes requires NSP2, a
member of the GRAS family of transcriptional regulators. Science 308: 1786– Supporting Information
1789.
Khade SW, Rodrigues BF, Sharma PK. 2010. Symbiotic interactions between Additional supporting information may be found in the online
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and male papaya plants: its status, role and version of this article.
implications. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48: 893–902.
Lauressergues D, Delaux PM, Formey D, Lelandais-Briere C, Fort S, Cottaz S, Fig. S1 The response of Medicago truncatula roots to Sinorhizobium
Becard G, Niebel A, Roux C, Combier JP. 2012. The microRNA miR171 h
modulates arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of Medicago truncatula by
meliloti Nod factors on a low or high nitrogen medium.
targeting NSP2. Plant Journal 72: 512–522.
Lerouge P, Roche P, Faucher C, Maillet F, Truchet G, Prome JC, Denarie J. 1990. Fig. S2 The response of Medicago truncatula roots to COs.
Symbiotic host-specificity of Rhizobium meliloti is determined by a sulphated and
acylated glucosamine oligosaccharide signal. Nature 344: 781–784. Fig. S3 The response of Medicago truncatula roots to Myc-LCOs
Liu W, Kohlen W, Lillo A, Op den Camp R, Ivanov S, Hartog M, Limpens E, Jamil
M, Smaczniak C, Kaufmann K et al. 2011. Strigolactone biosynthesis in
on a high nitrogen medium.
Medicago truncatula and rice requires the symbiotic GRAS-type transcription
factors NSP1 and NSP2. Plant Cell 23: 3853–3865. Table S1 Accession numbers and species names of genes used in
Maillet F, Poinsot V, Andre O, Puech-Pages V, Haouy A, Gueunier M, Cromer L, Fig. 1
Giraudet D, Formey D, Niebel A et al. 2011. Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide
symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 469: 58–63.
Oldroyd GE, Harrison MJ, Paszkowski U. 2009. Reprogramming plant cells for
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or
endosymbiosis. Science 324: 753–754. functionality of any supporting information supplied by the
Oldroyd GE, Long SR. 2003. Identification and characterization of nodulation- authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be
signaling pathway 2, a gene of Medicago truncatula involved in Nod actor directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.
signaling. Plant Physiology 131: 1027–1132.
Smit P, Raedts J, Portyanko V, Debelle F, Gough C, Bisseling T, Geurts R. 2005.
NSP1 of the GRAS protein family is essential for rhizobial Nod factor-induced
transcription. Science 308: 1789–1791.

No claim to original French goverment works New Phytologist (2013) 199: 59–65
New Phytologist Ó 2013 New Phytologist Trust www.newphytologist.com

You might also like