Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SAR With Digital Beamforming On Receive Only: Manvan - Younis@etec - Uni-Karlsruhe - de
SAR With Digital Beamforming On Receive Only: Manvan - Younis@etec - Uni-Karlsruhe - de
Overall it can be stated that the price that was paid and is
being paid for the advancement of technology is extremely
high. Despite of this, the goal of wide coverage is not
reached. In spot mode operation the resolution is higher but
the coverage is low compared to standard operation. In
standard operation the resolution is marginal. It is also the
intention of the following system proposal to overcome this
dilemma.
The above listed inherent deficiencies of state of the art Each antenna beam has to cover the same area for proper
SAR systems may be overcome by the introduction of operation. This requires equal half power beamwidth for the
several, mostly new ideas for S A R system concepts: transmit antenna and each of the receiving antennas, thus
OBW,uansmitt
= OBW,reccive.See for example the forward looking
- forward looking S A R SAR with digital beamforming on receive only in [4].
- digital beam forming on receive only
- single frequency operation. Transmit Sub-system: For this synthetic aperture radar a
sketch of the transmit sub-system is shown in Fig. 2.
The idea of a forward looking SAR has been reported
&lar, IOU reflector antenna
several times, for example in [2]. Digital beam forming is on
the way to become an important tool in communications for
space division multiple access (SDMA) for the improvement
of network capacities. Totally new is the concept of a single
frequency operation with a forward looking S A R [3]. It has to
be stated, that not each of these items is advantageous for each
operation.
1774
efficiency of phased array transmit subsystem will not exceed The receive subsystem exhibits also several distinct
16%). The swath becomes wider and the synthetic aperture advantages:
longer.
- low gain sub array antennas
Receive Sub-system: The receive sub-system comprises - low noise figure
multiple receive antennas for which a typical configuration is - future growth capability
shown in Fig. 3. Each receiving antenna is connected to a - simultaneous focusing of the whole swath.
filter, a low noise amplifier, a down converter and an V Q
digitizer. Special care has to be taken in this case regarding The system improvements, compared to conventional
the placement of the receive antennas. Although the airborne S A R , are obvious. The single receiving subsystems
positioning is arbitrary, the antennas have to be mounted in a can be used for a multitude of different applications on
way that no ambiguities arise. For typical airbome different aircraft. They can be almost conformally mounted on
applications at least two antennas out of the whole set have to the aircraft body. A high RF isolation, because of the
be closely spaced, e.g. 2h. For a forward looking SAR the separation from the transmitter, can be achieved. Depending
maximum distance between receiving elements gives the on the processing, immediately an interferometric S A R for
achievable resolution. If the receiving antennas are unequally 2l/*-D resolution results.
spaced an optimum can be reached for both resolution and
unambiguous range. CONSIDERATIONS:
The system design requires a trade off between resolution,
swath-width, antenna size and power balance. The lower the
antenna gain, the wider is the illumination angle and the
better is the resolution. A lower gain reduces the receive
power and lowers the signal to noise ratio.
LITERATURE:
[l] Zahn, R., "Hardware Developments for the German
SmartSAR Program", 1998 IEEE International
Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
Proceedings, Seattle, Vol. 3 , pp. 1701-1703.
[21 Carrara, W., Goodman, R., Majewski, R., "Spotlight
Fig. 3 Airborne multi-static receive sub-system
Synthetic Aperture Radar", Artech House, 1995
Compared to phased array systems the above configuration [3] Wiesbeck, W., Fischer, C. "New SAR System
with multiple parallel receiving channels has the following Configuration for Detection of Buried Objects 'I,
1775