Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soufian Lakrit, Hassan Ammor, Soufiane Matah, Radouane Karli, Adil Saadi,
Jaouad Terhzaz & Abdelwahed Tribak
To cite this article: Soufian Lakrit, Hassan Ammor, Soufiane Matah, Radouane Karli, Adil Saadi,
Jaouad Terhzaz & Abdelwahed Tribak (2018) A new small high-gain wideband rectangular patch
antenna for X and Ku bands applications, Journal of Taibah University for Science, 12:2, 202-207,
DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2018.1451105
A new small high-gain wideband rectangular patch antenna for X and Ku bands
applications
Soufian Lakrita, Hassan Ammora, Soufiane Mataha, Radouane Karlib, Adil Saadic, Jaouad Terhzazd and
Abdelwahed Tribake
a
Electronic and Communication Laboratory, EMI, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco; bDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khalifa
University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE; cENSAM, Universite Moulay Ismail, Meknès, Morocco; dCentre Régional des Metiers
de l’Education et de la Formation, Casablanca, Morocco; eInstitut National des Postes Et Telecommunications (INPT), Rabat, Morocco
pattern of the antenna. So a larger patch width increases defined as the dielectric constant of the uniform dielec-
the power radiated and thus gives decreased resonant tric material so that:
resistance, increased bandwidth and increased radiation
1
efficiency. The patch width should be selected to obtain 1r + 1 1r − 1 h −2 W
good radiation efficiency if real state requirements or 1reff = + 1 + 12 ≫ 1. (2)
2 2 W h
grating lobe are not overriding factors. It has been
suggested for patch dimension that 1 < W/L < 2
[14,21]. The patch length determines the resonant fre-
2.3. Length and width
quency, and it is critical parameter in the design;
however, the patch length L for TM10 mode is given Due to fringing effect, electrically the patch dimensions
by the following equation: will be bigger than its physical dimensions. A practical
C approximate formula to calculate the width and length
L= √ , (1) is shown below. The following equation is used to cal-
2fr 1r
culate the width W:
where fr is the resonant frequency.
C
W= , (3)
1r + 1
2fr
2.2. Fringing effect 2
To account for the fringing effect, an effective dielectric where fr is the resonant frequency, C is the free-space
constant εreff is used. The effective dielectric constant is velocity of light (C = 3.108 m/s) and εr is the dielectric
Figure 2. Geometry of the proposed antenna, (a) top view and (b) bottom view.
204 S. LAKRIT ET AL.
Figure 4. E-plane and H-plane radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at different frequencies (a) 11.5 GHz and (b) 12.5 GHz for
proposed antenna without metallic surface Grd 2.
JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE 205
Figure 5. S11 optimization for different values of d between Figure 7. Return loss of the proposed antenna.
Grd1 and Grd2.
Figure 10. Comparison of measured and simulated return loss. Figure 12. Gain of proposed antenna vs. frequencies.
Table 2. Comparison between the measured and simulated For the proposed antenna, two principle planes are
return loss. selected to present the radiation pattern. These are
Bandwidth at −10 dB Resonant Level S11
(GHz) frequency (GHz) (dB)
referred to as the E and H plane. Figure 11 illustrates
HFSS 10.94–12.91 (1.97 GHz) 11.62 −32.99
the radiation patterns, in the H-plane (x–z plane) and
CST 11.06–12.96 (1.9 GHz) 11.6 −22.61 E-plane (y–z plane). It can be seen that the radiation
12.5 −23.19 patterns in x–z plane are nearly omnidirectional for
Measured 10.8–13.55 (2.75 GHz) 11.4 −13.10
13.17 −14.50 the two frequencies.
Figure 12 shows the variation of the gain versus fre-
return loss of the fabricated antenna was measured quency. The average gain of the proposed antenna is
using vector network analyser VNA Master MS2028C. 3.75 dB, whereas the maximum gain is 4.91 dBi which
Figure 10 shows the comparison between the simu- is better than that given in refs [17] and [18]. The
lated and measured return loss of the proposed antenna gain is relatively good and can be improved by
obtained by the experimental and the two tools for simu- making an array of antennas of our prototype. The effi-
lation. We conclude that we have a good agreement ciency was obtained from gain and directivity and is
between simulations and measurements results. There depicted in Figure 13. An overall level of about 82%–
exist some differences if we consider the frequencies of 86% can be attained in the band of 10–14 GHz.
resonance (Table 2); however, in terms of bandwidth, Table 3 presents a comparison between the per-
the results remain very comparable. Little offset may be formance of some recently developed antennas for X-
attributed to the fact that the substrate FR4 used for the band applications and the proposed antenna. Our
fabrication of the antenna does not possess uniform antenna shows wide impedance bandwidth, compact
characteristics in terms of its material properties. size and good gain features.
Figure 11. E-plane and H-plane radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at different frequencies (a) 11.5 GHz and (b) 12.5 GHz.
JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY FOR SCIENCE 207