You are on page 1of 6

Hydrometallurgy 65 (2002) 31 – 36

www.elsevier.com/locate/hydromet

Kinetics of ilmenite dissolution in hydrochloric acid


Jacobus P. van Dyk a,*, Nanne M. Vegter a,1, P. Chris Pistorius b,2
a
Kumba Resources Limited, P.O. Box 9229, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
b
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Received 12 January 2001; received in revised form 22 May 2002; accepted 22 May 2002

Abstract

The kinetics of ilmenite dissolution in hydrochloric acid is investigated with data previously published in literature. Based
on this, a leaching mechanism is proposed. The factors that influence changes in the rate-controlling step as leaching progresses
are also explained. Finally, the proposed leaching mechanism is used to explain the results of some experiments.
D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Ilmenite; Hydrochloric acid; Leaching

1. Introduction ature, stirring, acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio and addi-


tives. The influence of each of these parameters is
The aim of this paper is to investigate the kinetics illustrated, where possible, through a comparison of
of ilmenite dissolution in hydrochloric acid. This is selected examples available in literature with the study
done through a literature study that allows the pro- conducted by Jackson and Wadsworth (1976).
posal of a mechanism for ilmenite leaching. The
proposed mechanism is used to explain the results 1.1. Particle size
of certain experiments.
The ilmenite leaching reaction can be described by Jackson and Wadsworth (1976) found that particle
the following chemical reaction: size does not influence the rate of ilmenite dissolution.
Three size fractions were used namely  150 + 106,
FeTiO3 þ 2HCl ! Fe2þ þ TiO2þ þ 2Cl þ 2OH  230 + 150 and  328 + 230 Am. The samples were
leached in 6 M HCl at 75 jC at an initial acid-to-
The main parameters that can influence the rate of this
ilmenite mole ratio of 692:1. Both iron and titanium
reaction are particle size, acid concentration, temper-
went into solution under these conditions and almost
100% extraction of both elements was reached within
*
Corresponding author. Fax: +27-12-307-7407. 250 min for all size fractions.
E-mail addresses: jaco.vandyk@kumbaresources.com Olanipekun (1999) found the opposite and showed
(J.P. van Dyk), nanne.vegter@kumbaresources.com (N.M. Vegter),
pistori@postino.up.ac.za (P.C. Pistorius).
that particle size does influence the rate of ilmenite
1
Fax: + 27-12-674-1161. dissolution. Three size fractions were used namely
2
Fax: + 27-12-362-5168. + 20 – 37, + 37 – 53 and + 53 –74 Am. The samples

0304-386X/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 0 4 - 3 8 6 X ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 6 3 - 4
32 J.P. van Dyk et al. / Hydrometallurgy 65 (2002) 31–36

were leached in 7.2 M HCl at 70 jC at an initial acid- less than 50% was extracted at 80 jC. Jackson and
to-ilmenite mole ratio of 8:1. Both iron and titanium Wadsworth (1976) used temperatures ranging from 60
went into solution under these conditions. The rate of to 90 jC. The acid concentration was 6 M HCl and the
iron and titanium extraction increased as the particle initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio was 692:1. After
size decreased. The maximum amount of iron dis- 100 min, 100% of the iron and titanium was extracted
solution achieved was about 62% after 300 min. This at 90 jC, while only 90% was extracted at 70 jC.
was for the + 20 – 37 Am fraction. At the same time,
about 58% of the titanium in this fraction dissolved. 1.4. Stirring

1.2. Acid concentration Jackson and Wadsworth (1976) did not investigate
the effect of stirring speed, but Tsuchida et al. (1982)
Both Hussein et al. (1976) and Jackson and Wads- and Sinha (1984) did include this parameter in their
worth (1976) found that the rate of ilmenite dissolu- investigations. Both Tsuchida et al. (1982) and Sinha
tion is strongly dependent on acid concentration. (1984) found no significant increase in the rate of iron
However, in the experiments conducted by Hussein or titanium extraction with in an increase in stirring
et al. (1976), mainly iron was dissolved, while in the speed in the range of 100– 500 min  1. Sinha (1984)
experiments by Jackson and Wadsworth (1976), both did, however, report that higher stirring speeds
titanium and iron went into solution. Hussein et al. resulted in the production of excessive quantities of
(1976) used four different acid concentrations ranging < 10 Am TiO2 fines. Tsuchida et al. (1982) conducted
from 2.16 to 6.48 M HCl. The leaching tests were his experiments with 11.4 M HCl at 70 jC and used
performed at 90 jC at initial acid-to-ilmenite mole an initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio of 69:1. Sinha
ratios that varied between 6:1 and 17:1, depending on (1984) conducted experiments with 6 M HCl at 108
the acid strength. The maximum iron extraction was jC. The initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio used by
about 35% after 160 min in the 6.48 M solution, while Sinha (1984) was 1:1.
only 7% of the iron was removed in the 2.16 M
solution after the same period. Jackson and Wads- 1.5. Acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio
worth (1976) used 4, 5 and 6 M HCl solutions. The
leaching tests were conducted at 90 jC at initial acid- The initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio seems to
to-ilmenite mole ratios, which depending on the acid influence whether both iron and titanium goes into
concentration, ranged from 188:1 to 353:1. After 400 solution or whether only iron goes into solution. In the
min, 100% of the iron and titanium was extracted in experiments conducted by Jackson and Wadsworth
the 6 M HCl solution, while about 10% of the iron and (1976) at initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratios ranging
titanium were dissolved in the 4 M HCl solution in the from 300:1 to 700:1 both iron and titanium tended to
same time period. go into solution, while in the experiments conducted
by Sinha (1984) at initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratios
1.3. Temperature of 1:1 to 1.1:1, mainly iron was dissolved.

The rate of ilmenite dissolution increases rapidly as 1.6. Additives


the leach temperature rises. This was found by both
Jackson and Wadsworth (1976) and Sinha (1984), but The addition of certain additives to the leach
both iron and titanium went into solution in the solution can either increase or decrease the rate of
experiments conducted by Jackson and Wadsworth ilmenite dissolution. Duncan and Metson (1982)
(1976), while mainly iron dissolved in the experi- found that when they added bisulphate and fluoride
ments conducted by Sinha (1984). Sinha (1984) con- to the leach solutions, the dissolution rate of both iron
ducted his experiments at temperatures ranging from and titanium increased, but when they added phos-
80 to 108 jC. A 6 M HCl solution was used at an phoric acid and Ti(IV) to the leach solution, the
initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio of 1:1. After 4 h, dissolution rate of iron and titanium decreased dra-
almost 95% of the iron was extracted at 108 jC, while matically. Girgin (1990) performed a similar experi-
J.P. van Dyk et al. / Hydrometallurgy 65 (2002) 31–36 33

ment using methanol additions. He found that the rate solutions. Nabivanets and Kudritskaya (1967) deter-
of iron and titanium dissolution increased dramatically mined the following criteria to indicate when poly-
when methanol additions were used compared to merisation of titanium would occur: [Ti(IV)] > 10  3
dissolution in the normal hydrochloric acid solution M and [H(I)]>0.5 M. Fig. 1 shows a Ti(IV) – chloride
(3 M HCl). speciation diagram as calculated by Cservenyák et al.
(1996). This confirms that the Ti(IV) species that form
are dependent on the Ti(IV) and Cl(-I) concentrations
2. Mechanism of ilmenite leaching in solution. The Cl(-I) concentration in the leach
solution is usually determined through the choice of
The information presented in the previous section the initial acid strength. The Ti(IV) concentration on
suggests that under certain conditions, the rate of the the other hand increases as the leach reaction pro-
dissolution of ilmenite could be chemically controlled. gresses. Once the Ti(IV) concentration in solution
Under other conditions, it could be controlled by the exceeds the value of 10  3 M, polymerisation will
diffusion of the reacting species and the resulting occur. The diffusion of the resultant polymer chains
products to or away from the reaction interface or it away from the reaction interface will now become the
can be controlled by the diffusion of these species rate-limiting step in the leach reaction. The timing of
through a product layer on the surface of the particles. the change in the rate-limiting step will depend on the
A mechanism for ilmenite leaching in hydrochloric initial acid-to-ilmenite ratio. At high acid-to-ilmenite
acid will now be proposed that will clarify under what ratios such as those used by Jackson and Wadsworth
conditions each of these rate-determining steps oper- (1976), the Ti(IV) concentration in solution may never
ate. reach the critical concentration required for polymer-
Initially, as predicted by the chemical reaction isation, while under the conditions used by some of
equation, when ilmenite comes into contact with the the other investigators, such as Sinha (1984), the
hydrochloric acid leach solution, both iron and tita- critical concentration in solution may be reached very
nium go into solution. At this point, the rate is early in the leach test.
controlled by the rate of the chemical reaction. The next critical event that influences the rate of
The next step in the chain of events will be the reaction is the eventual formation of the solid
determined by the titanium species that form in species TiOCl2 as the Ti(IV) concentration in solution
solution. Ti(IV) polymerises in hydrochloric acid increases. The TiOCl2 can precipitate in the pores of

Fig. 1. Ti(IV) – chloride speciation diagram for 0.1 Ti(IV) activity at 298 K as calculated by Cservenyák et al. (1996).
34 J.P. van Dyk et al. / Hydrometallurgy 65 (2002) 31–36

the leached particle or as fines in the leach solution. Table 1


When a relatively low initial acid-to-ilmenite mole Chemical analysis of the ilmenite feed material that was used for the
leach experiments (wt.%)
ratio is used along with a high leach temperature, the
TiO2 FeO MgO Al2O3 CaO V2O5 Cr2O3 MnO SiO2
titanium polymerisation reaction proceeds very rap-
idly and this results in precipitation of TiOCl2 in the 43.3 47.83 0.58 0.61 0.07 0.33 0.69 0.81 0.9
pores of the particles. At lower temperatures or at
higher initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratios, the poly-
merisation reaction does not proceed as rapidly and unless stated otherwise) was introduced into the
this results in the formation of TiOCl2 fines in the reactor and heated up to the required temperature with
leach solution. When the precipitation occurs in the a heating mantle. The ilmenite sample was then
pores of the particles, the particles retain their shapes introduced. This was taken as the start of the experi-
and a product layer is formed. The rate-determining ment. Solution samples were taken at regular intervals
step in the leach reaction now changes to diffusion of for analysis. After 8 h, the experiment was ended and
the reacting species through the product layer. the leach residue was separated from the spent liquor
Any additives that are added to the leach solution through filtration and washed until the pH of the wash
can influence the titanium species in solution and solution was neutral. The residue was then split into
consequently the rate-determining step. By stabilising two. One part was analysed by ICP to determine the
soluble species of iron and titanium, the rate of chemical composition, and the other was analysed
dissolution can be maintained. On the other hand, with a Malvern Mastersizer to determine its particle
the rate of dissolution can decrease significantly if the size distribution.
additives promote the formation of solid species of
iron and titanium that precipitate from solution to
form a product layer on the surfaces of the particles. 4. Results and discussion
The final event that can influence the leach reaction
is a significant reduction in the hydrogen ion concen- Fig. 2 shows the effect of leach temperature and
tration. This will occur when a low initial acid-to- initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio on the amount of
ilmenite mole ratio is used in a batch leach test. The dissolved titanium. A significant amount of titanium
decrease in acid concentration and the resultant rise in was dissolved when an initial acid-to-ilmenite mole
pH can lead to the formation of a TiO2H2O precip- ratio of 60:1 was used, up to 45% at 105 jC. In
itate in the existing product layer. It will also result in comparison, very little dissolution of titanium
a change in the rate-limiting step. The diffusion of occurred when an initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio
hydrogen ions to the reaction interface will now of 4:1 was used. A higher leach temperature increased
become the rate-limiting step. the quantity of dissolved titanium in both cases but the
effect was much more pronounced when an initial
acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio of 60:1 was used.
3. Experimental This result fits in with the proposed mechanism as
higher initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratios will delay
Selected experiments were conducted to evaluate the polymerisation of titanium and this will allow
the proposed mechanism. A waste stream, containing much more titanium to dissolve from the ilmenite.
mainly ilmenite that is produced during the production The formation of a product layer is also enhanced
of crude ilmenite for smelting was used for the when low initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratios are used;
purpose of the investigation. The chemical composi- consequently, very little titanium dissolved when a
tion of the material is presented in Table 1. The  106 ratio of 4:1 was used.
Am fraction of the material was removed prior to the Fig. 3 shows the percentage of  106 Am material
experiments. that formed during the leach experiments. All the
The leach experiments were conducted in a 1-L  106 Am particles were removed from the feed
batch fluidised leach column, fitted with a reflux material prior to the experiment. The  106 Am
condenser. The premixed acid solution (6 M HCl, material that was present in the residue was therefore
J.P. van Dyk et al. / Hydrometallurgy 65 (2002) 31–36 35

Fig. 2. The influence of initial acid/ilmenite mole ratio during leaching on the percentage of titanium that is lost to the leach solution.

taken to be fines formed during the leaching process. This result also supports the proposed mechanism.
Very few fines formed when a 4:1 initial acid-to- At low initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratios, the Ti(IV)
ilmenite mole ratio was used. In contrast, up to 50% rapidly polymerises and precipitates inside the pores
of the leach residue was fines when an initial acid-to- of the particles. This allows the particles to retain their
ilmenite mole ratio of 60:1 was used at 100 jC. A shape and prevents the formation of TiOCl2 fines. At
higher leaching temperature also increased the quan- high initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratios, the polymer-
tity of fines in the residue. This effect was much more isation reaction is delayed and this result in the
pronounced for the experiment performed with the destruction of the ilmenite particles, and when TiOCl2
60:1 initial acid-to-ilmenite mole ratio. finally forms, it will precipitate as extremely fine

Fig. 3. The effect of initial acid/ilmenite mole ratio on the quantity of TiO2 fines produced during leaching.
36 J.P. van Dyk et al. / Hydrometallurgy 65 (2002) 31–36

particles in the leach solution. The higher leach Duncan, J.F., Metson, J.B., 1982. Acid attack on New Zealand
temperature increased the rate of the leach reaction, ilmenite: I. The mechanism of dissolution. New Zealand Journal
of Science 25, 103 – 109.
and this allowed for the formation of more fines in the Girgin, I., 1990. Leaching of ilmenite in HCl – H 2 O, HCl –
same period of leaching. CH3OH – H2O and HCl – CH3OH solutions. Hydrometallurgy
24, 127 – 134.
Hussein, M.K., Kolta, G.A., El-Tawil, S.Z., 1976. Removal of iron
from Egyptian ilmenite. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry 19 (19),
143 – 152.
5. Conclusion Jackson, J.S., Wadsworth, M.E., 1976. A kinetic study of the dis-
solution of Allard Lake ilmenite in hydrochloric acid. Light
The rate-determining step during the dissolution of Metals 1, 481 – 540.
ilmenite is dependent on the titanium species in Nabivanets, B.I., Kudritskaya, L.N., 1967. A study of the polyme-
solution. This is regulated by the leach conditions at risation of titanium(IV) in hydrochloric acid solutions. Russian
Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 12 (5), 616.
any point in time. The changes in the rate-controlling Olanipekun, E.O., 1999. A kinetic study of the leaching of a Nigerian
step can be predicted by tracking the changes in leach ilmenite ore by hydrochloric acid. Hydrometallurgy 53, 1 – 10.
conditions as the leach reaction progresses. The pro- Sinha, H.N., 1984. Hydrochloric acid leaching of ilmenite. Proceed-
posed mechanism could explain the reported exper- ing of the Symposium on Extractive Metallurgy AusIMM Mel-
imental results as well as previously published results bourne (Australia), The Australasian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy, Level 3, 15-31 Pelham street, Carlton Victoria,
by other authors. 3053, Australia, pp. 163 – 168.
Tsuchida, H., Narita, E., Takeuchi, H., Adachi, M., Okabe, T., 1982.
Manufacture of high pure titanium(IV) oxide by the chloride
References process: I. Kinetic study on leaching of ilmenite ore in concen-
trated hydrochloric acid solution. Bulletin of the Chemical So-
ciety of Japan 55 (6), 1934 – 1938.
Cservenyák, I., Kelsall, G.H., Wang, W., 1996. Reduction of TiIV
species in aqueous sulfuric and hydrochloric acids: I. Titanium
speciation. Electrochimica Acta 41 (4), 563 – 572.

You might also like