MUMBAI NAGPUR EXPRESSWAY CONSTRUCTION

CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS CONTROLLED NAGPUR- MUMBAI SUPER COMMUNICATION
EXPRESSWAY (MAHARASHTRA SAMRUDDHI MAHAMARG) IN THE STATE OF

MAHARASHTRA ON EPC MODE FOR PACKAGE 10, FROM KM. 444+845 TO KM. 502+752
Format No.:T/F 6 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

Client MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SPV NAGPUR MUMBAI SUPER COMMUNICATION EXPRESSWAY LIMITED
Authority Engineer FP Project Management
Construction Contractor Larsen & Toubro Limited - TIIC(RR&EC)
FREE SWELL INDEX

[As per IS 2720 (Part - 40)
Laboratory Job No. Date Sampled 27.09.19
Type of Material Soil Sampled By Jointly
Source BA-57 @ PIT 01 Date Tested 28.09.19
Location 488+700 LHS @ 6 KM Tested By Jointly
Proposed Use EMB/SUB
Sample level in Sample level in Free Swell in Free Swell Index

Average
Water (Vw) kerosene (Vk) Water (Vw-Vk) 100x(Vw-Vk)/Vk
S.No. Free Swell Index
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
13 10 3 30
3 30
Note : 1. Test sample shall be passing 425 micron sieve

2. Take 10gm of each sample.
Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..
Specification Limits as per MoRTH Clause 305.2, Free Swell Index shall not be more than 50%
For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

MUMBAI NAGPUR EXPRESSWAYCONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS CONTROLLED NAGPUR- MUMBAI SUPER COMMUNICATION
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF SOILS

[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]
Type of Material Soil Sampled by Jointly
Location 488+700 LHS @ 6 KM Tested by Jointly
Weight of sample taken(gm): 1000

Cumulative
S Weight Cumulative Cumulative
Sieve Size Weight Remarks
no Retained Retained Passing
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 38.26
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 189.5 18.95 18.95 81.05 33.67
(D-G):%
D 4.75 193.1 19.31 38.26 61.74
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 102.6 10.26 48.52 51.48 28.07
(G):%
F 0.425 90.6 9.06 57.58 42.42
G 0.075 143.5 14.35 71.93 28.07

(From village Fatiyabad to village surala in aurangabad district)

ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
[As per IS 2720, (Part-5)]
Laboratory Job no Date Sampled 27.09.19
Type of material Soil Sampled by Jointly
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
Determination No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Container No. 165 166 167 168 169 170
Empty Wt.of Container (W1) gm 15.87 15.33 15.16 15.55 14.82 14.49
Wt.of Container and Wet material (W2) gm 41.79 43.98 43.61 37.61 18.19 17.95
Wt.of Container and Dry material (W3) gm 35.59 36.96 36.44 31.86 17.41 17.15
Wt.of Moisture (W4=W2-W3) gm 6.20 7.02 7.17 5.75 0.78 0.80
Wt.of dry material (W5=W3-W1) gm 19.72 21.63 21.28 16.31 2.59 2.66
Moisture Content w = 100 x W4/W5 % 31.44 32.45 33.69 35.25 30.12 30.08
No. of Blows / Penetration 34 30 22 17 Average= 30.10
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
6.20 7.02 7.17 5.75 0.78 0.80
% Moisture content
19.72 21.63 21.28 16.31 2.59 2.66

35.00
31.45 32.46 33.69 35.22 30.16 30.04
30.00 30.1
25.00
20.00
10 25 No. of blows 100
Calculation for PI shall made as follows:-

1. The Plasticity index is calculated as the difference between its Liquid limit & Plastic limit
2. In case of sandy soil PL should be determined first, When PL can not be determined, The
PI should be reported as Non-Plastic (NP)
3. When the plastic limit is equal to or greater than the liquid limit, The PI shall be reported as zero
RESULTS:-
Liquid Limit(%)LL = Plastic Limit(%)PL = Plasticity Index PI =


MODIFIED PROCTOR'S DENSITY TEST
B Mould No. :- 4 Wt.of mould (A) = 5730 gm

gm Volume of mould (V)= 2250 cc
C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
D Wt.of wet sample + mould gm 9133 9868 10313 10565 10397 10024
E Wt.of wet sample (E = D-A) gm 3403 4138 4583 4835 4667 4294
F Wet density of sample (F = E/V) gm/cc 1.512 1.839 2.037 2.149 2.074 1.908
G Container No. 61 62 63 64 65 66
H Wt.of Empty container gm 21.48 21.50 21.52 21.70 21.30 22.20
J Wt.of wet sample+Cont. gm 136.40 136.37 135.61 133.13 134.18 138.93
K Wt.of dry sample+Cont. gm 132.99 130.35 127.31 122.81 121.12 123.19
L Wt.of water(L=J-K) gm 3.41 6.02 8.30 10.31 13.06 15.74
M Wt.of dry sample(M=K-H) gm 111.51 108.85 105.79 101.11 99.82 100.99
N Water content [N = 100X(L/M)]% 3.06 5.53 7.85 10.20 13.08 15.59
P Dry density[P=100x(F/(100+N))] gm/cc 1.468 1.743 1.889 1.950 1.834 1.651
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 10.20 10.171
1.85 1.3 1.931
1.8
1.950 1.95
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 10.2
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Method used:- Modified Rammer Wt.:- 4.89 kg No. of blows/layer :- 25 / 55 No. of layer :- 5
MDD= 1.950 OMC= 10.2 %

Specification Limits as per MoRTH Clause 305.2, Maximum Dry unit required for
Embankment upto 3m hieght :15.2 kN/cu.m
Embankment exceeding 3m hieght :16 kN/cu.m
Subgrade and Earthen shoulders,verges, backfill :17.5 kN/cu.m

(From Village Fatiyabad to Village Surala in Aurangabad District)
Format No.:T/F 7-1 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TEST
[As per IS 2720(Part-16)]
Laboratory job no. Date sampled 27.09.19
Source/Location BA-57 @ PIT 01&02 Date casted 05-10-2019
MDD of Sample (gm/cc) 1.963 Date tested 09-10-2019

OMC of Sample (%) 10.00 Tested by Jointly
Proposed use EMB/SUB
MOISTURE CONTENT AND UNIT WEIGHT OF TEST SAMPLES
S.No Description Specimen 1 Specimen 2 Specimen 3
A. Mould No. 10 11 12
B. No.Of blows per layer 55 55 55
C. Condition of sample while SOAKING Before After Before After Before After
D. Wt.of mould(gm) 6326 6079 6431
E. Wt.of wet sample+mould(gm) 10973 11030 10783 10866 11129 11104
F. Wt.of wet sample(E-D)(gm) 4647 4704 4704 4787 4698 4673
G. Volume of mould/sample (cc) 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
H. Wet density (F/G)(gm/cc) 2.065 2.091 2.091 2.127 2.088 2.077
J. Moisture determination
K. Container no. 31 32 33 34 35 36
L. Wt.of container(gm) 34.89 32.82 33.64 33.44 31.49 28.86
M. Wt.of wet sample+cont.(gm) 148.86 144.52 145.69 144.22 143.37 142.68
N. Wt.of dry sample+cont.(gm) 139.57 133.96 136.54 133.07 134.04 131.10
P. Wt.of water(M-N)(gm) 9.29 10.56 9.15 11.15 9.33 11.58
Q. Wt.of dry sample(N-L)(gm) 104.68 101.14 102.90 99.63 102.55 102.24
R. Water content[(P/Q)x100](%) 8.87 10.44 8.89 11.19 9.1 11.33
S. Dry density{H/[1+(R/100)]}(gm/cc) 1.897 1.893 1.920 1.913 1.914 1.865
LOAD PENETRATION TEST DATA
Penetrati Proving ring Proving ring Proving ring

GENERAL INFORMATION Load(kgf) Load(kgf) Load(kgf)
on (mm) reading reading reading
0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Type of compaction used: Static/ Dynamic
0.5 7 30.6 6 26.2 7 30.6
1.0 15 65.5 14 61.1 14 61.1
Period of soaking: 4 days
1.5 21 91.7 20 87.3 20 87.3
2.0 29 126.6 27 117.9 27 117.9
Wt.of surcharge used (kg): 5
2.5 35 152.8 33 144.1 33 144.1
Proving ring Number & capacity: 4.0 53 231.5 50 218.4 50 218.4
13527 - 50kN 5.0 64 279.5 61 266.4 61 266.4
7.5 88 384.3 82 358.1 83 362.5
Proving Ring Load Factor 4.367
10.0 99 432.3 93 406.1 94 410.5
12.5 103 449.8 97 423.6 98 428.0
Corrected unit load from graph(kg) for 2.5mm 152.8 144.1 144.1
CBR at 2.5mm (%) 11.2 10.5 10.5
CBR at 5.0mm(%) 13.6 13.0 13.0
CBR reported (%) 13.2
For L&T TIIC For FPPM For MMSCEL/ MSRDC

C B R TEST
Source BA-57 @ PIT 01&02 Date tested 09-10-2019
LOAD Vs PENETRATION GRAPH

600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 10
Load at 2.5mm Penetration 152.8
CBR at 2.5mm Penetration 11.2
CBR reported as (%)= 13.6

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 11

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 12


B Mould No. :- 4 Wt.of mould (A) = 5730 gmgm Volume of mould (V)= 2250 cc
C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 67 68 69 70 71 72
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 9.80 9.7911
1.85 1.3 1.967
1.8
1.975 1.975
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 9.8
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 1.975 OMC= 9.8 %



FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
11 10 1 10
3 10

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 38.88
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 168.9 16.89 16.89 83.11 42.97
(D-G):%
D 4.75 219.9 21.99 38.88 61.12
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 123.7 12.37 51.25 48.75 18.15
(G):%
F 0.425 162.7 16.27 67.52 32.48
G 0.075 143.3 14.33 81.85 18.15


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 171 172 173 174 175 176
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
5.55 6.63 7.27 6.94 0.72 0.68
% Moisture content
18.11 20.87 21.99 20.19 2.53 2.38

35.00
30.65 31.78 33.07 34.36 28.51 28.39
30.00 28.45
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-


FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
13 10 3 30
3 30

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 33.17
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 178.6 17.86 17.86 82.14 36.19
(D-G):%
D 4.75 153.1 15.31 33.17 66.83
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 103.6 10.36 43.53 56.47 30.64
(G):%
F 0.425 112.1 11.21 54.74 45.26
G 0.075 146.2 14.62 69.36 30.64


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 177 178 179 180 181 182
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
6.37 6.35 6.00 7.11 0.86 0.68
% Moisture content
19.20 18.56 16.82 19.19 2.86 2.25

35.00
33.19 34.23 35.65 37.04 30.18 30.02
30.00 30.1
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 73 74 75 76 77 78
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 9.60 9.6111
1.85 1.3 1.985
1.8
1.990 1.99
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 9.6
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 1.990 OMC= 9.6 %



A. Mould No. 13 14 15
D. Wt.of mould(gm) 6283 6387 6193
K. Container no. 37 38 39 40 41 42
P. Wt.of water(M-N)(gm) 9.57 11.17 9.29 10.80 9.53 11.18

0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.5 8 34.9 8 34.9 8 34.9
1.0 18 78.6 18 78.6 17 74.2
1.5 25 109.2 26 113.5 25 109.2
2.0 34 148.5 34 148.5 33 144.1
2.5 41 179.0 42 183.4 40 174.7
13527 - 50kN 5.0 75 327.5 76 331.9 73 318.8
7.5 104 454.2 105 458.5 101 441.1
10.0 119 519.7 121 528.4 116 506.6
12.5 125 545.9 126 550.2 122 532.8
CBR at 2.5mm (%) 13.1 13.4 12.8
CBR at 5.0mm(%) 15.9 16.2 15.5

C B R TEST

600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 13

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 14

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 15


FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
12 10 2 20
3 20

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 35.50
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 168.7 16.87 16.87 83.13 33.40
(D-G):%
D 4.75 186.3 18.63 35.50 64.50
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 101.3 10.13 45.63 54.37 31.10
(G):%
F 0.425 85.7 8.57 54.20 45.80
G 0.075 147.0 14.70 68.90 31.10


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 183 184 185 186 187 188
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
5.95 5.81 6.75 5.67 0.78 0.67
% Moisture content
19.79 18.43 20.46 16.65 2.92 2.53

35.00
30.08 31.51 32.97 34.04 26.59 26.45
30.00 26.52
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 79 80 81 82 83 84
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 11.00 10.991
1.85 1.3 1.927
1.8
1.930 1.93
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 11
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 1.930 OMC= 11 %



FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
12 10 2 20
3 20

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 38.82
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 156.3 15.63 15.63 84.37 32.68
(D-G):%
D 4.75 231.9 23.19 38.82 61.18
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 88.4 8.84 47.66 52.34 28.50
(G):%
F 0.425 85.1 8.51 56.17 43.83
G 0.075 153.3 15.33 71.50 28.50


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 189 190 191 192 193 194
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
5.62 5.74 5.09 6.16 0.56 0.75
% Moisture content
19.38 19.13 16.32 19.11 2.13 2.83

35.00
28.97 29.98 31.17 32.25 26.51 26.39
30.00 26.45
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 85 86 87 88 89 90
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 9.20 9.1911
1.85 1.3 1.993
1.8
2.000 2
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 9.2
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 2.000 OMC= 9.2 %



A. Mould No. 16 17 18
D. Wt.of mould(gm) 6372 6263 5916
K. Container no. 43 44 45 46 47 48
L. Wt.of container(gm) 31.77 29.19 31.11 30.63 31.31 29
M. Wt.of wet sample+cont.(gm) 142.78 140.71 143.1 144.49 143 140.71
P. Wt.of water(M-N)(gm) 8.45 9.79 9.01 11.36 9.18 11.34

0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.5 8 34.9 7 30.6 7 30.6
1.0 17 74.2 16 69.9 15 65.5
1.5 24 104.8 22 96.1 22 96.1
2.0 32 139.7 30 131.0 29 126.6
2.5 39 170.3 37 161.6 36 157.2
13527 - 50kN 5.0 71 310.1 68 297.0 66 288.2
7.5 99 432.3 94 410.5 91 397.4
10.0 111 484.7 106 462.9 103 449.8
12.5 115 502.2 109 476.0 106 462.9
CBR at 2.5mm (%) 12.4 11.8 11.5
CBR at 5.0mm(%) 15.1 14.5 14.0

C B R TEST

600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 16

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 17

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 18


FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
13 11 2 18
3 18

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 40.10
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 169.8 16.98 16.98 83.02 33.40
(D-G):%
D 4.75 231.2 23.12 40.10 59.90
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 95.7 9.57 49.67 50.33 26.50
(G):%
F 0.425 89.5 8.95 58.62 41.38
G 0.075 148.8 14.88 73.50 26.50


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 195 196 197 198 199 200
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
6.35 7.65 6.88 6.13 0.71 0.62
% Moisture content
18.66 21.47 18.71 16.05 2.29 2.01

35.00
34.05 35.65 36.76 38.16 31.15 31.05
30.00 31.1
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 91 92 93 94 95 96
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 10.00 10.001
1.85 1.3 1.931
1.8
1.945 1.945
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 10
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 1.945 OMC= 10 %



FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
12 10 2 20
3 20

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 32.26
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 178.9 17.89 17.89 82.11 47.59
(D-G):%
D 4.75 143.7 14.37 32.26 67.74
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 123.4 12.34 44.60 55.40 20.15
(G):%
F 0.425 210.7 21.07 65.67 34.33
G 0.075 141.8 14.18 79.85 20.15


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 201 202 203 204 205 206
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
5.90 7.40 7.64 6.65 0.61 0.69
% Moisture content
17.96 21.76 21.80 18.25 2.01 2.29

35.00
32.84 34.02 35.06 36.42 30.19 30.31
30.00 30.25
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 97 98 99 100 130 132
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 9.40 9.3711
1.85 1.3 2.013
1.8
2.030 2.03
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 9.4
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 2.030 OMC= 9.4 %



A. Mould No. 19 20 21
D. Wt.of mould(gm) 5778 6457 6196
K. Container no. 49 50 167 169 171 172
P. Wt.of water(M-N)(gm) 9.97 11.74 9.24 11.42 9.20 11.60

0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.5 8 34.9 7 30.6 7 30.6
1.0 17 74.2 16 69.9 16 69.9
1.5 24 104.8 22 96.1 22 96.1
2.0 32 139.7 30 131.0 29 126.6
2.5 39 170.3 37 161.6 36 157.2
13527 - 50kN 5.0 72 314.4 68 297.0 67 292.6
7.5 99 432.3 94 410.5 92 401.8
10.0 110 480.4 105 458.5 102 445.4
12.5 118 515.3 112 489.1 109 476.0
CBR at 2.5mm (%) 12.4 11.8 11.5
CBR at 5.0mm(%) 15.3 14.5 14.2

C B R TEST

600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 19

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 20

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 21


FREE SWELL INDEX

Source BA-57 @ PIT-08 Date Tested 28.09.19

Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
13 11 2 18
3 18

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 34.58
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 162.4 16.24 16.24 83.76 35.57
(D-G):%
D 4.75 183.4 18.34 34.58 65.42
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 97.8 9.78 44.36 55.64 29.85
(G):%
F 0.425 108.8 10.88 55.24 44.76
G 0.075 149.1 14.91 70.15 29.85


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 207 208 209 226 228 231
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
5.93 5.95 6.89 7.35 0.77 0.53
% Moisture content
18.79 18.07 20.27 20.68 2.88 2.01

35.00
31.57 32.91 33.99 35.53 26.57 26.43
30.00 26.5
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 134 135 137 138 141 143
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 11.60 11.551
1.85 1.3 1.898
1.8
1.900 1.9
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 11.6
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 1.900 OMC= 11.6 %



FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
13 10 3 30
3 30

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 37.50
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 168.9 16.89 16.89 83.11 32.30
(D-G):%
D 4.75 206.1 20.61 37.50 62.50
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 98.6 9.86 47.36 52.64 30.20
(G):%
F 0.425 81.0 8.10 55.46 44.54
G 0.075 143.4 14.34 69.80 30.20


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
Container No. 235 239 240 241 242 244
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
6.72 6.48 6.44 6.44 0.69 0.82
% Moisture content
21.78 20.11 19.28 18.65 2.39 2.83

35.00
30.87 32.24 33.39 34.51 28.76 28.94
30.00 28.85
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 146 147 148 152 154 155
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 10.20 10.181
1.85 1.3 1.995
1.8
1.995 1.995
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 10.2
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 1.995 OMC= 10.2 %



A. Mould No. 22 23 24
D. Wt.of mould(gm) 6388 6366 6642
K. Container no. 173 174 175 176 177 181
P. Wt.of water(M-N)(gm) 9.03 11.07 9.75 11.56 8.98 10.78

0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.5 8 34.9 8 34.9 8 34.9
1.0 18 78.6 18 78.6 17 74.2
1.5 25 109.2 25 109.2 24 104.8
2.0 35 152.8 34 148.5 32 139.7
2.5 41 179.0 41 179.0 39 170.3
13527 - 50kN 5.0 76 331.9 75 327.5 71 310.1
7.5 107 467.3 105 458.5 101 441.1
10.0 120 524.0 117 510.9 112 489.1
12.5 126 550.2 124 541.5 118 515.3
CBR at 2.5mm (%) 13.1 13.1 12.4
CBR at 5.0mm(%) 16.2 15.9 15.1

C B R TEST

600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 22

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
1
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 23

C B R TEST
600
500
### ###
0 8
400
Load (kg)
### ###
0 8
300
200
100
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0
Penetration (mm)
Results:-
Mould no. 24


FREE SWELL INDEX


Average
(%)
(ml) (ml) (ml) (%)
1
12 11 1 9
3 9

Remarks : ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


[As per IS : 2720, (Part 4)]

Cumulative
Retained
(mm) (gms) (gms) (%) (%)
GRAVEL CONTENT
A 100.0 0 0 0 100 37.98
(B-D):%
B 75.0 0 0 0 100
SAND CONTENT
C 19.0 122.1 9.12 9.12 90.88 29.03
(D-G):%
D 4.75 386.5 28.87 37.98 62.02
SILT&CLAY CONTENT
E 2.00 83.0 6.20 44.18 55.82 32.98
(G):%
F 0.425 156.5 11.69 55.87 44.13
G 0.075 149.3 11.15 67.02 32.98


ATTERBERG'S LIMITS
3 4 5 6 7 8
Container No. 7 9 10 12 13 14
LIQUID LIMIT CHART
50.00
45.00 25 25
20 40
40.00
6.07 6.52 7.33 6.12 0.59 0.77
% Moisture content
18.53 19.12 20.81 16.64 2.14 2.77

35.00
32.78 34.11 35.21 36.77 27.58 27.62
30.00 27.6
25.00
20.00

RESULTS:-



C Trial No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
G Container No. 158 159 160 161 163 166
2.05
2
1.95
1.9 9.80 9.8011
1.85 1.3 2.004
1.8
2.000 2
1.75
Dry Density (gm/cc)
0 9.8
1.7
1.65
1.6
1.55
1.5
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Moisture
9 10 11 12 13Content
14 15(%)16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
MDD= 2.000 OMC= 9.8 %


MUMBAI NAGPUR EXPRESSWAY CONSTRUCTION

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MUMBAI NAGPUR EXPRESSWAY CONSTRUCTION

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS CONTROLLED NAGPUR- MUMBAI SUPER COMMUNICATION

EXPRESSWAY (MAHARASHTRA SAMRUDDHI MAHAMARG) IN THE STATE OF

Format No.:T/F 6 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

FREE SWELL INDEX

Sample level in Sample level in Free Swell in Free Swell Index

Note : 1. Test sample shall be passing 425 micron sieve

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

Format No.:T/F 8 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

Client MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

SPV NAGPUR MUMBAI SUPER COMMUNICATION EXPRESSWAY LIMITED

Authority Engineer FP Project Management

Construction Contractor Larsen & Toubro Limited - TIIC(RR&EC)

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF SOILS

Type of Material Soil Sampled by Jointly

Source BA-57 @ PIT 01 Date Tested 28.09.19

Location 488+700 LHS @ 6 KM Tested by Jointly

Proposed Use EMB/SUB

Weight of sample taken(gm): 1000

D 4.75 193.1 19.31 38.26 61.74

F 0.425 90.6 9.06 57.58 42.42

G 0.075 143.5 14.35 71.93 28.07

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

Format No.:T/F 5 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

19.72 21.63 21.28 16.31 2.59 2.66

Calculation for PI shall made as follows:-

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

Format No.:T/F 4 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

B Mould No. :- 4 Wt.of mould (A) = 5730 gm

MDD= 1.950 OMC= 10.2 %

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

Source/Location BA-57 @ PIT 01&02 Date casted 05-10-2019

MDD of Sample (gm/cc) 1.963 Date tested 09-10-2019

Penetrati Proving ring Proving ring Proving ring

For L&T TIIC For FPPM For MMSCEL/ MSRDC

LOAD Vs PENETRATION GRAPH

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

LOAD Vs PENETRATION GRAPH

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

LOAD Vs PENETRATION GRAPH

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

Format No.:T/F 4 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

MDD= 1.975 OMC= 9.8 %

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

Format No.:T/F 6 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

FREE SWELL INDEX

Sample level in Sample level in Free Swell in Free Swell Index

Note : 1. Test sample shall be passing 425 micron sieve

For L&T, TIIC For FPPM For NMSCEL/MSRDC

Format No.:T/F 8 Rev no: 0 Rev. Date : 14.01.2019

Client MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

SPV NAGPUR MUMBAI SUPER COMMUNICATION EXPRESSWAY LIMITED

Authority Engineer FP Project Management

Construction Contractor Larsen & Toubro Limited - TIIC(RR&EC)

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF SOILS

Type of Material Soil Sampled by Jointly

Source BA-57 @ PIT 02 Date Tested 28.09.19

Location 488+700 LHS @ 6 KM Tested by Jointly

Proposed Use EMB/SUB

Weight of sample taken(gm): 1000

D 4.75 219.9 21.99 38.88 61.12

F 0.425 162.7 16.27 67.52 32.48

G 0.075 143.3 14.33 81.85 18.15