Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revolt of 1857 Nature Historiography PDF
Revolt of 1857 Nature Historiography PDF
Introduction
The Revolt of 1857, commonly called as the Sepoy Revolt, was the first
organised revolt against British rule in India. It was the culmination of the
manifold grievances that Indians had against the East India Company’s
rule. It was to a great extent a popular revolt led by exiled princes and
displaced landlords. The revolt was largely confined to North and Central
India. The transfer of the Indian administration from the English East
India Company to British Crown was the important result of the Revolt.
The revolt has been hailed as the watershed or the ‘great divide’ in the
colonial history of British India.
Nature
The nature and character of this revolt remained a controversial subject
both among the contemporary British writers and the present ones.
Historians have written treatises full of complex arguments on this
subject.
The historiography of the revolt is as old as the event itself. Almost all the
earlier books and accounts of the events of 1857 were written by
Englishmen. They have dubbed Indians as traitors and mutineers while
they have praised the role of the Englishmen. The Indians did not dare to
write anything because during the period immediately following the
revolt, great atrocities were committed by the British and the Indians
were crushed brutally.
The main strands of debates on the nature of the revolt of 1857 can be
understood by four main questions.
Charles Ball and J.W. Kaye were among the pioneers who wrote about
1857 from the ‘Sepoy mutiny’ perspective. Both attached tremendous
importance to caste status, which the sepoys thought were undermined in
the cantonments. They also represent the outbreak of 1857 as an
organized campaign to drive away the British from India.
P.C. Joshi identifies the elitist nature of leadership. The peasants fought
against the new type of landlords who were created by the policies of the
British and not against the traditional landlords.
Conclusion
On the basis of various arguments forwarded by different authors, it may
be concluded that the revolt of 1857 was anti-imperialist and nationalist,
because both Hindus and Muslims participated in equal measure and in
close cooperation, and both sepoys and the civilians wanted to overthrow
the imperial rulers.