everything and

A feature that there's nothing that

bounds what one can stop you.
can do
We can agree that
“God grant me the some limitations are
serenity to accept nothing but imposed
by our minds and
the things I cannot
others by society.
change, the The problem starts
courage to change when there is
the things I can, something outside
and the wisdom to our boundary of
know the control that seems
difference.” and is, completely
-Unknown random something
that one cannot
change such as
Limitations come in biology.
different forms and
colors, but in People argue that
today's society we biological
have accepted one limitations does not
truth that is: “All exist calming that
limitations are in they only exist if we
your mind,” as if to impose a value
say you control structure over what
we are, if I'm 5 feet army and they are
tall that is not constantly looking
considered as a for more but even
limitation only if I they with their low
impose a value standards have
structure to say the decided that a
value structure of a person with an I.Q.
basketball player lower than 85
then suddenly, I'm cannot be in the
limited by height. military forces.

The problem with I.Q determinates the

this is that biology fast we learn and
has set in ourselves our success in the
humans standards world therefore it
and for doing a narrows our vision
specific job you of it.
need specific It is not the only
characteristics e.g. trade that
to be scientist you determinates our
need an I.Q. at least success in the world
of 145, it's not only and our vision of it,
with the high end of how good looking
our world. The U.S. one is determinates
government is the success in
known for accepting intimate
a lot of people in the relationships,
especially for outputs (grades) to
females, but also the same impute
how forgiven we are (essays) changes
with one another in the way people
a study essays were would see what a
delivered to good thing is (what
supervisors attached a good essay is) the
with a picture of good looking person
good looking person will thing that
and a non-good her/his essay is
looking person the good enough and
ones with the the not good
picture of the good looking person will
looking persons think that her/his
were rated higher essay is terrible.
that the ones of the
not good looking Near perfection or
person. perfection, itself

We can argue that “One must have

our limitations bread; but before
determinate the way bread, one must
we look at the have the ideal.”
world. Taking the Víctor Hugo
behavioral approach
we can say that The ideal is what
offering different some of us have at
the top of our value perfection, so you
structure the perfect don’t have to be in a
something, the relationship because
perfect speech, the if you find the
perfect perfect girl you’ll be
conversation, the trap in a
perfect relationship, relationship, you
the perfect job, you don’t have get a job
name it. The until you find your
problem starts when passion then you
we realize that by can start working in
our limits, we it. The problem with
cannot archive this way of acting is
perfection, when a there are so many
pessimist tells you options that
“there is always probabilities of
something wrong choosing the right
with what you do”. one in the first try is
People approach almost zero, but
this problem in even if you come
different ways. across with
perfection you don’t
The waiting game
have enough
These individuals experience to
believe that you identify it.
must be ready and
free when you find The Nihilist and
Postmodernist
They believe that as your positive
perfection is an emotions increase
unachievable goal by your movement
why should forward.
someone bother A way to address
trying there for, they this problem
act as they please
and they regard The only
themselves as free, conceivable way
the price they pay I’ve eared and
by not pursuing barely understood is
perfection is not to overtry, to move
exploiting their forward towards
ultimate potential. something even if it
They will never try is not perfect.
pushing things Perhaps you won’t
forward, moving find what you want
things forward is but for sure you will
moving then near find what you do
perfection and they not want, sometimes
reject that ideal. As you will have to do
you are not moving drastically changes,
forward you and there might be a
experiment less lot of things that
positive emotion. you hate but that’s
Psychological better that reaming
studies have proved static.
 to us to even
Value structure or
conceive what those
value hierarchy realities are without
help of technology
“You see what you we must dip into the
aim at” Darwinian
-Jordan B. Peterson perspective.
Biology and the
value structure While we were
evolving, we had
The world is too limited resources,
overwhelming for food wasn’t
our limited abundant, humans
sentences we simply were born with
cannot see some source of
everything around difference and those
us we cannot see all who proved to be
the colors, capable of surviving
temperature, and even being
dimensions, successful had
directions at the offspring because
same time or in with limited
darkness. In nature resources privileges
we can see animals as seen temperature
that are capable of couldn’t be
doing this source of supported.
things. To explain
why it’s impossible We limited our
world to nothing but
the most essential structure. We
parts, but what or choose what’s the
whom decided what most important
were those essential thing for us then we
parts? Well it’s both, have secondary
the way we decided priorities.
it, was by what Some people might
made our offspring thing that the goal is
survive, female only a simple thing
decided what was that you set but our
that because they perception of the
were vulnerable world it’s the same
when pregnant as for everyone yet
the risk is big, they that couldn’t be
better choose farther from reality.
wisely.
The gorilla
We can see that we
experiment
had goal (to
survive) which was A group of people is
considered as the asked to count how
most important many times the
thing and we made teams score a point,
sacrifices around there are two a
the way to make white and a black
that happen then we team of three people
had other priorities each. They are
that is the value watching the game
in a video format. more important.
At some point, a
gorilla strolls into You see what you
the middle of the aim at! Then all the
action, faces the other things don’t
camera and thumps matter. You aim at
its chest, and then what’s at the top of
leaves, spending your value structure.
nine seconds on
screen. Half people We act as we see
didn’t see the gorilla
at Harvard When you are told a
University story of a victim
that has suffered a
This experiment lot to the hands of a
reveals two things: tyrant you will help
that we are missing this person and look
a lot of what goes for a way to make
on around us, and this tyrant pay by
that we have no idea his horrible actions.
that we are missing Then with
so much but why investigation you
we miss so much? find that the tyrant
Is it because of our is not really a tyrant
biological limits? In it’s a normal person
part yeas but this is who had made
telling us something mistakes but the
person who told you or positive
the story
exaggerated his
emotion
faults you have Are you happy?
acted incorrectly but
it was shaped by Our society regard
how you saw the happiness as one of
world and the world the most important
were this tyrant and things in one life, so
the victim that never important that it is
were a tyrant nor a written in the
victim. declaration of the
independence of the
The importance of U.S., we often listen
the value structure the idea that we
is that it guides us should be happy.
through life and it The tunnel might be
set not only what dark but there is a
the most important light at the end,
thing is but what implying that there
you see and what is a happy ending or
you don’t at least positive emotions at
but as important the end of the
how you act in the journey.
world.
Putting happiness at
Feeling pleasure the top of the value
hierarchy implies is part of the Fourth
that we’ll do Nobel Truths and
everything to have one of the Three
happiness in our life Marks of Existence
and at first glance it of Buddhism.
might seem as a
reasonable thing to Some people also
do the problem is argue that
that life is not about Christianity is based
happiness, on the idea that life
happiness is as, and, is suffering the
the ideal itself theologist Gilbert
something Bilezikian said that
unattainable at the moment in
multiple religions which Jesus is at the
across different crust when he asks
cultures have “father why have
decided that life is you abandoned me?
suffering. For a brief moment
Jesus himself
The Duhkha becomes atheist.
concept that means Analyzing this we
pain, referring to the can say that the
suffering to the suffering of life is
mundane life, this so overwhelming
concept is so that god doubts of
important that that himself.
 meaning to life it
But even if life were makes it interesting
not suffering you falling it’s
would not want to interesting because
be happy. In a it takes us out of the
physiological study mundane and if we
they measure overcome failure,
positive and we become
negative interaction someone
they concluded that remarkable. But we
if a relationship has can also identify
5 negative with suffering and
interaction to 1 that is not good.
positive the "Don't fall in love
relationship won’t with your suffering.
last. Understandable Never presume that
you don’t want to your suffering in
have unnecessary itself is a proof of
suffering. If a your authenticity." -
relationship has 10 Zizek
positive interactions
to 1 negative the If you were happy
relationship wont you will think that
last as well. It’s too everything is good
boring. all people are good,
there are so many
Suffering gives resources you invest
all your many in Now we are
everything because continuous, and we
everything is good, make one
and you get broken fundamental
because most of the question for our life
things are bad. “How should we
see the world?” we
We want something
look at people
different at the top
around us, we ask
of our hierarchy of
value what is that. for advice that even
I’ll leave it up to when it looks far
you. from the question it
comes from the
Before necessity of answer
continuousness it.
arises, we have Doc. Jordan
already structured Peterson explains
the world and our that the
vision of it it’s fundamental
already narrowed question that we
even farther before are trying to answer
we are born our when we ask, “How
gens have set our should we see the
fate and that alone world?” is not that
have set our vision. question itself but
“How should we
act?” because after
all we don’t care
about the world but
we care about our
success in it.
My question is
“What’s the perfect
way of looking at
world?” but in
reality, my question
is: How should I act
so that someone
else can take this
path and be
successful?