Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Choking
Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version: 2
Summary Guidance to reduce the risk of choking for adults with Learning
Disabilities, Mental Health and physical health diagnoses.
1
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Version Control
Change Record
Reviewers/contributors
2
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Contents
Section Title Page
1 Introduction 4
1.1 Definition
1.2 Prevalence
1.3 Purpose
1.4 Hazards and Emergencies
1.5 Framework
4. Supporting references 11
Appendices
1. Medicine Considerations in Patients at Risk of Choking 13
3
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Choking – managing the risk of choking guidelines
1. Introduction
1.1. Definition
Choking is the introduction of a foreign object (edible or non-edible) into a person’s
airway which becomes lodged and reduces or completely obstructs the airflow to the
lungs. Prolonged or complete choking results in asphyxia, which leads to anoxia and is
potentially fatal.
For the general population choking is a risk whenever food is consumed due to the
closeness of the structures in the throat through which we eat and breathe, and the
close co-ordination of both of these functions. People with a diagnosis of a learning
disability are known to be at a higher risk of choking than other people (Thacker et al,
2007; Samuels et al, 2006). Additional risks for this population include dysphagia; poor
oral health; behaviour such as cramming (overfilling) and self-harm; pica and the side
effects of medication (The Hampshire Safeguarding Board, 2012). Studies of
psychiatric in-patient populations have also shown a significantly increased risk of
choking in patients with chronic schizophrenia (Kulkarni et al 2017).
1.2. Prevalence
In 2007 The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) found 605 reports of choking-
related incidents in England and Wales involving adults with a Learning Disability
(between 30th April 2004 and 30th April 2007). Every year people with a learning
disability die from choking while eating and drinking, which could be prevented
(Glover, 2010).
Allen (2012) summarises the prevalence in the mental health population and claims
that there is between an 8 and 20-fold increased risk of choking in patients with mental
illness compared with the general population. (Kulkarni et al 2017) noted that food-
related choking deaths were far more prominent in schizophrenia than in other serious
mental illnesses. Death was related to either acute asphyxia from airway obstruction,
or more insidious aspiration pneumonia.
1.3. Purpose
The purpose of this document is to provide clear guidance on the roles and
responsibilities of Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (SHFT) staff within the
management of the risk of choking.
The aim of this document is to ensure safe and effective management for service
users who are at an increased risk of choking.
It is mandatory for all SHFT staff to complete and remain up-to-date with Basic Life
Support training which includes knowing the signs of choking and how to respond if a
choking incident occurs. In addition training providers should be requested to advise
4
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
on appropriate interventions for people who use wheelchairs or those with a large or
atypical body shape which can make standard response procedures difficult to carry
out.
Appendix 2 states the documentation procedure that should be followed in the event of
a choking incident occurring.
1.5. Framework
This framework attempts to aid the decision making and care planning for staff within
SHFT when working with people with a Learning Disability and/or Mental Health and/or
physical health diagnoses who are felt to be at risk of choking. It aims to assist
clinicians with identifying hazards and risks associated with choking and offer guidance
in what to do about managing these risks.
The aim of this guidance is to minimise the risk of choking and prevent injury, illness
and death.
This guidance should be used in a holistic way with the service user at the centre.
Whenever possible the service user should be involved in the decision making around
their care. If the person does not have capacity to make an informed decision, despite
all reasonable attempts to provide information that is accessible, then decisions should
be made in their best interests which will include their wishes and preferences, and in
consultation with those that know them best.
Physical - Any significant change in physical health, speech or oral skills should promote a
review of choking.
The person is not able to be Consider:
supported to maintain an Temporary support to maintain upright stable position.
upright posture with Physiotherapy advice around posture.
controlled movement and Occupational Therapy support with specialist
sensation during meals. knowledge of seating and/or adaptive equipment (e.g.
(This may be the result of ‘neater eater’, weighted spoons etc.)
physical disability, injury or DOLS if mechanical restraint is required.
damage- especially Stroke, Liaison with Speech and Language Therapy if
Parkinson’s Disease, postural/physical difficulties are impacting on ability to
Huntington’s Disease, manage current diet.
Cerebral Palsy, Tardive
Dyskinesia and other
problems affecting muscle
tone.)
Poor oral health care (for Consider:
example, missing teeth, ill- Seek dental advice.
fitting dentures) which is new, Improve mouth care
has increased or where there Medical/ dental review
is no previous advice.
Level of alertness, e.g. Consider:
having poor or variable levels Medical review if reason for poor levels of alertness is
of alertness and increase in unknown.
lethargy (this may include Ensure awake and alert before all mealtimes.
those who have epilepsy, are Ensure level of supervision when eating/drinking is
‘end-of-life’, who are frail, or
5
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
who are chronically unwell.) adequate.
Complete a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool
(MUST) and liaise with Dietician if there is significant
unplanned weight loss.
Speech and Language Therapy support if person is
also showing difficulties managing food/drink
consistency.
Medication (see Medicine Considerations in Patients at
Risk of Choking Appendix 1).
Known injury or trauma to Consider:
neck or throat. Medical review/ physiological review
Ensure level of supervision when eating/drinking is
adequate.
Complete a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool
(MUST) and liaise with Dietician if there is significant
unplanned weight loss.
Speech and Language Therapy support if person is
also showing difficulties managing food/drink
consistency.
Excessive salivation Consider:
Dry mouth/ decreased Medical review/ medication review
salivation Ensure level of supervision when eating/drinking is
adequate.
Complete a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool
(MUST) and liaise with Dietician if there is significant
unplanned weight loss.
Speech and Language Therapy support if person is
also showing difficulties managing food/drink
consistency.
Is generally in poor physical Consider:
health Medical review
Treatments for physical health needs
Augmented and alternative diet and nutrition to support
treatment and recovery.
Ensure level of supervision when eating/drinking is
adequate.
Complete a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool
(MUST) and liaise with Dietician if there is significant
unplanned weight loss.
Speech and Language Therapy support if person is
also showing difficulties managing food/drink
consistency.
6
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Syndrome or physical illness Consider associated risks:
(e.g. dementia, Prader-Willi Look out for signs of deterioration in ability to prepare
syndrome, pseudobulbar food appropriately.
palsy.) Look out for deterioration in eating and drinking skills -
consider a referral to Speech and Language Therapy.
Complete a MUST and liaise with Dietician if there is
significant unplanned weight loss or weight gain.
Risk of cramming (overfilling mouth) in Prader-Willi
Syndrome (Stevenson et al, 2006).
Ensure mealtimes are supervised, carers or family are
Basic Life Support trained and use common-sense
approach to preventing access to high risk choking
items.
Epilepsy Knowledge of the triggers to seizures and ensure to
minimise these at meal times.
Knowledge of warning signs of a seizure and stop
feeding if there are concerns that seizures may be due
to take place.
Supporting someone who has food in their mouth
whilst having a seizure (do not attempt to remove
food).
Stop feeding if service user continues to have
seizures/ poor recovery.
Be aware of the possibility of vomiting and hence the
risk of choking.
Behaviour related
7
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Moving around whilst eating Ensure level of supervision when eating is adequate.
Ensure the person has a care plan detailing what
verbal/physical prompts support them to sit down
whilst eating.
Consider liaising with Occupational Therapy around
sensory needs.
Storing food in the mouth or Ensure level of supervision when eating is adequate to
food left in the mouth/cheeks provide prompting to swallow food left in the mouth.
after swallowing. Consider referral to Speech and Language Therapy for
eating and drinking assessment if prompting is not
successful.
Abnormal eating and Consider
swallowing habits e.g. Thorough and focussed history taking and physical
excessively rapid eating and examination.
bolting of food. Taking Multidisciplinary review and treatment as part of risk
inappropriately large boluses management with the patient (whenever possible).
of food. Swallowing without This includes treatment of mental illness, medication
chewing. etc.
Support, aid and help during mealtimes
Ensure level of supervision when around food is
adequate
Size and texture of food as well as size of portions.
Taking food of a texture that Ensure level of supervision when around food is
is beyond their skill level to adequate.
manage safely (e.g. taking a If the person is not felt to have the capacity to
toffee when recommended a understand the risks associated with eating un-safe
pureed diet) foods, make sure that a risk assessment and care plan
detailing how to minimise the risk has been completed.
If the person is felt to have the capacity to decide what
texture they eat consider offering some accessible
information on choking and aspiration. Support the
person to prepare these in a way which reduces risk
(e.g. finely chopping or suggest alternatives).
Consider liaising with the other members of the team
(i.e. Community Nursing, Psychology) for support
around behaviour that is challenging.
Taking food when nil by Ensure level of supervision when around food is
mouth (eg gastrostomy or NG adequate.
fed) If the person is not felt to have the capacity to
understand the risks associated with eating un-safe
foods, make sure that a risk assessment and care plan
detailing how to minimise the risk has been completed.
Consider liaising with the other members of the team
(i.e. Community Nursing, Psychology) for support
around behaviour that is challenging.
Unmanaged Pica (eating Ensure level of supervision is adequate to reduce
non-food items). immediate risk. Pica can cause choking, small bowel
obstruction, parasite infestations, gastrointestinal
perforations and death.
Consider the environmental management of Pica (no
dangerous objects available/in reach).
Check that those supporting the person have a
8
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
detailed risk assessment and care plan in place.
Consider functional assessment, analysis and
intervention.
Consider a nutritional deficiency – liaise with GP.
Consider liaising with Occupational Therapy re:
enriching environment/sensory needs.
Consider liaising with the rest of the MDT (Psychology,
Speech and Language Therapy and Nursing).
Know to whom and how to escalate to if items that are
potentially dangerous (eg batteries, poisons) have
been ingested, and how to manage in the interim.
Eating in a non-ideal position, Ensure the person is supported and encouraged to sit
e.g. lying down. in a stable upright position where possible.
Provide accessible information on posture and eating.
If the person is unable to achieve a safe position
please refer to Physical section above.
Consider referral to OT/ physio to look at equipment
and positioning to aid posture and reduce risk.
Regurgitation of food. Eliminate possible physical health causes. Consider
need for Nursing assessment.
Seek medical advice (e.g. reflux, oesophageal cancer).
Liaise with Occupational Therapy around sensory
assessment.
Liaise with Psychology.
Pushing food, fingers or Ensure the person has adequate supervision to
utensils forcefully to the back intervene if required.
of the mouth. Ensure that a detailed risk assessment and care plan
has been completed detailing how to support the
person to prevent this (e.g. distraction techniques,
removing harmful utensils).
Consider referral to Speech and Language Therapy for
eating and drinking assessment.
Liaise with Occupational Therapy around sensory
assessment.
Secretive bingeing. Ensure the person has adequate supervision to
intervene if required.
Ensure that a detailed risk assessment and care plan
has been completed detailing how to support the
person to prevent this (e.g. distraction techniques).
Consider liaising with Psychology and/or eating
disorder service.
Consider MDT review and care planning with the
patient.
9
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Signs and symptoms of dysphagia
Alcohol or drug misuse Assess the mental health state, patient’s capacity and
level of alertness.
Consider level of supervision.
Consider whether prescribed medication is appropriate
at this time (seek advice from prescriber or Medic).
Problems with swallowing Consider service user’s medication review by a
medication (e.g. tablets). pharmacist, doctor or non-medical prescriber.
NEVER alter medication (e.g. crush, opening capsules,
mixing medications) without consultation with
Pharmacist or prescriber (this is a legal requirement).
Please see Choking Drug Card (Appendix i).
Takes medication known to Liaise with a pharmacist, doctor or non-medical
cause difficulties with prescriber for medication review.
swallowing (i.e. causes dry Explore the barriers to compliance (e.g. can’t swallow
mouth, changes in muscle tablet/s).
control, sedation or extra- Consider liaising with prescriber around administration
pyramidal symptoms). time if medication is felt to be impacting on mealtimes.
Please see Choking Drug Card (Appendix i).
Compliance
10
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Consider staff training around ‘Eating and drinking
awareness’.
The individual is eating foods Access capacity and document this.
which are of a texture that is If they have capacity around food textures and risk,
against specific SLT ensure they have accessible information at an
guidance. appropriate level and format relating to the risks.
Support the person to prepare foods in a way which
reduces risk – e.g. finely chop.
If they do not have capacity to decide to eat these
items against advice, there needs to be a best interest
decision around restricting these items.
Consider safeguarding, if there appears to be carer
non-compliance around professional advice.
4. Supporting references
Glover, G. Ayub, M. (2010) How people with learning disabilities die. Improving Health
and Lives: Learning Disabilities Observatory: DoH.
Hampshire Safeguarding Adults Board (2012) Reducing the risk of choking for people
with a learning disability: A Multi-agency review in Hampshire.
National Patient Safety Agency. (2007). Ensuring Safer Practice for Adults with
Learning Disabilities who have Dysphagia
11
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
study. Disability and rehabilitation,30(15): 11312-1138.39.
Kulkarni D.P. Kamath V.D. Stewart J.T (2017) Swallowing Disorders in Schizophrenia.
National Center for Biotechnology Information – on line. Springer Science+Business
Media New York (outside the USA) doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9802-6. Epub 2017 Apr
26. 32:467–471.
12
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Appendix 1 – Medicine Considerations in Patients at Risk of Choking
Patient Review;
Who is at risk? Higher risk groups include the very young and old, mental health e.g. dementia, stroke, COPD, learning
disability/ID, neurological disease, head and neck cancer.
Also consider; behaviour (bolting food, pica, cramming, boredom, hunger, taking of food), difficulties swallowing food
(dysphagia) and risk (poor first aid response, poor supervision, and compliance with care plans).
Consequences of choking; non-adherence with treatment, traumatic experience (loss of trust with HCP), aspiration pneumonia
or death
13
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
How to choose a Medicine when a solid form is unsuitable References
NEWT guidelines
NPSA 2011
https://www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/
https://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2012/05/18/i/j/b/120522-med-errors.pdf
http://www.resourceclinical.com/crushing-tablets-and-drug-administration-via-
enteral-feeding-tubes.html
https://www.guidelinesinpractice.co.uk/sep_08_wright_dysphagia_sep08?sect
or=professional#.VB866zd0zIU
http://dysphagia-medicine.com/index.html
http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign119.pdf
https://www.sps.nhs.uk/wp-
content/uploads/2010/01/QA_307_1_Academic_detail_aid_Choosing_medicin
es_for_patients_unable_to_take_solid_oral_dosage_forms.doc
14
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Appendix 2 – Flowchart for reporting choking incidents
15
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Appendix 3 - SOLENT NHS RISK OF CHOKING SCREEN (for use county and service-
wide. Designed to be completed by carers and service providers)
Medical diagnoses……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Are these guidelines being followed? Give reasons for not following guidelines No Yes
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
3. Oral skills:
a) Are they able to chew a normal diet? If ‘No’, give details……………………………………………… No Yes
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
b) Is their food and/or drink currently modified? If ‘Yes’, how and why?................................ Yes No
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
4. Has there been a choking (partial or complete obstruction affecting respiratory function)
incident in the last 12 months? Yes No
If ‘Yes’: Number of occasions …………………………………………….…………………………………….………….
What was being eaten? ………………………………………………………..………………………………….…
5. Has the person had pneumonia or recurrent chest infections in the last 12 months?
If ‘Yes’: Number of occasions ………………………………………………………….………………………………… Yes No
Known respiratory conditions……………………………………………………..…………………….….
6. Has there been a significant change in the last 12 months in any of the following: (Please
provide details for any ‘Yes’ responses)
a) Unexpected weight loss………..……………………………………………………………………………………………. Yes No
b) Fluid intake……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Yes No
c) Time taken to complete meal/drink ……………………….Due to problem using cutlery? yes/ no Yes No
d) Self-feeding skills………………………………………………………Due to problem using cutlery yes/ no Yes No
e) Mealtime Environment……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Yes No
7. Does the person have any other behaviours that increase their risk of choking? Yes No
If ‘Yes’, please circle/ provide details e.g. fast pace/food cramming/pushing fingers/ utensils
into mouth/self-harming at mealtimes (not seen at other times)/storing food in cheeks?
Other……………………………………………………………………………...…………………………………………………………
What strategies are in place to manage this behaviour? (prompts/ smaller cutlery etc)
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Questions that relate to possible choking risks in addition to/ not related to dysphagia COLUMN A COLUMN B
8. Oral Health: Does the person have good oral hygiene/healthy teeth? If ‘No’, please provide No Yes
details……………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
9. Does the person have a diagnosis of Pica (a persistent craving & compulsive eating of non- Yes No
food substances)?
10. Is the person currently experiencing any of the following side effects from their medication:
relaxed muscle tone; drowsiness; dryness of the mouth; increased saliva? Yes No
If ‘Yes’, please provide details………………………………………………………………..……………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
16
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Appendix 3 - SOLENT NHS RISK OF CHOKING SCREEN (for use county and service-
wide. Designed to be completed by carers and service providers)
ACTION: If you have circled answers in column A, an updated care plan, adopting a common sense approach,
may be required to manage the risk of choking. Care plan updated (date)
If you have circled an answer in Column A questions 1-7 liaise with Speech & Language Therapy ENCLOSE THIS
SCREEN.
If the person has a Learning Disability, liaise via MDT Referral made to SLT following liaison Referral to
SLT not required following liaison.
For all other client groups, refer to your local Community Learning Disability Team ENCLOSE THIS SCREEN
WITH REFERRAL
If you have circled an answer in Column A questions 8-10 liaise with appropriate health professional/GP
DON’T refer to SLT
Dentist GP Behaviour specialist other…………………………………………….
Date completed:
17
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019
Appendix 4: MDT Eating, Drinking and Choking Risk Screen (in LD Clinical
Assessment)
1. Does the person have eating and drinking guidelines in place? Yes/No
If ‘Yes’ give details:…………………………………………………………………………………………
2. If there are eating and drinking guidelines in place are these being followed? Yes/No
Please give reasons for guidelines not being followed:…………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The following questions relate to signs and symptoms that may indicate a dysphagia
(swallowing difficulty) and/or factors that may contribute to the person being at an increased
risk of choking. If you answer YES to any of the following questions please discuss with the
MDT.
3. Are there any concerns about the person’s ability to eat and drink safely that aren’t being
managed? Yes/No
If ‘Yes’ give details:…………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
4. Does the person frequently cough before, during or after eating and/or drinking? Yes/No
5. Has there been a choking incident (partial or complete obstruction of the airway) in the last
12 months? Yes/No
If ‘Yes’ number of occasions …………………………………………….………………….………………
On what? ………………………………………………………..…………….….…...................................
6. Has the person had recurrent chest infections or aspiration pneumonia in the last 12
months? Yes/No
If ‘Yes’ number of occasions ………………………………………………………………………………..
Known respiratory conditions……………………………………………….……………………………….
7. Has there been a significant change in the last 12 months in any of the following:
a) Unplanned weight loss Yes/No
b) Fluid intake/signs of dehydration Yes/No
c) Time taken to finish meal/drink Yes/No
d) Self-feeding skills Yes/No
e) Mealtime environment Yes/No
If ‘Yes’ give details……………………………………………………………………………......................
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
8. Does the person have any other behaviours that may increase their risk of choking or aspiration
e.g. fast pace/cramming food/possible self-harm at mealtimes e.g. pushing fingers/utensils into
mouth, orstoring food in cheeks/mouth? Yes/No
If ‘Yes’ give details …………………………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
If ‘yes’ has the carer attempted prompting/reminding? Yes/No
If ‘yes’ but not successful discuss with Speech and Language Therapist/MDT
10. Oral Health: Are there concerns about the person’s oral hygiene/teeth? Yes/No
If ‘Yes’ give details……………….……………………………………………………………………………..
11. Does the person have a diagnosis of Pica (eating non-food substances)? Yes/No
12. Is the person currently experiencing any of the following side effects from their medication:
relaxed muscle tone; drowsiness; dryness of the mouth; increased saliva? Yes/No
If ‘yes’, please give details……………………………………………………………………………………
18
SH CP 233 Choking – Managing the risk of choking guidelines
Version 2
July 2019