You are on page 1of 2

Name:

Topic:

Topic Critical Review

Summary Topics/Concepts (3) New Insights I Had (3) Discussion Questions


I do not Understand After Reading the I Have about the Article
Article

The article focuses on the  The article I used to think that 1. If parents will be
development and unquestionably parents are just included as
implementation of an English pushes the vital informants in researcher and
Language Education role played by researches; however, will be involved in
Curriculum. the teachers in this article sheds light materials
the that parents and other recommendation,
Essentially, it highlights the implementation stakeholders in the to what extend
following points: of the community could be also could they
curriculum, an important partner of participate in
 The curriculum however, this the teachers in doing research work and
guide is loose-leaf, text did not researches. materials
not bound or – offer abundant selection?
stapled which means empirical I used to think that 2. How could ELA
it undergoes with the studies that administrators and teachers expand
process of support this curriculum designers are their interest of
development. claim. the most important doing researches
 The pilot approach as pillars in curriculum which are not only
a sensible middle  Teacher development but this qualitative in
ground between the researches can article reminds me the nature? Could
grassroots and top- be an integral significance of a ‘pilot they possibly do
down approaches part of approach’ where bulky quantitative
treated teachers as developing new teachers are given equal researches
responsible curriculum importance in designing without asking the
professionals that units and a curriculum. help of
could develop a wide materials but in statistician?
range of excellent, this article, it I used to think that 3. How could an ELA
innovative courses. did not mention research seems to be a teacher establish
 Without time for the reasons very tedious task for the a culture of
teachers to work on why most of teachers yet this reading research despite
projects, curriculum the teachers inspires me to be his/her multi
will follow consider engrossed in doing more tasks? Could the
conventional lines. research as a researches as one way in ELA teacher’s
 The teacher-as- “heavy achieving professional passion to do
researcher is above baggage” to growth. research despise
all a writer who gains carry. his/her other core
new power over functions such as
teaching, a sense of  There is no I used to think that extension,
ownership of discussion of publication is equally production, and
instruction that is not evaluating the difficult as doing instruction?
always possible if curriculum in research, in contrary,
curriculum is set by this text. this text encourages me 4. Why are the
outsiders. and other teachers the teachers not
 One of the greatest importance of publishing included in
failures in ELA one’s research output. designing,
curriculum change in developing and
recent years came revising the
about because of I used to think that curriculum
failure to adequately teachers are the ‘perfect despite the fact
inform the eyes’ to select realistic that teachers hold
communities. and relevant books for an explicit
 Engage parents and the learners but this knowledge of
students as article corrects me with what is going on
researchers who that concept that in a certain
could be elbow parents and other classroom?
partners of the stakeholders could be
teachers. partners in material
 A key to successful selection by doing
growth and “scavenger hunt”.
sustenance of the
program itself rests
with opportunities
for continued
professional growth.

You might also like