Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revised Survey Questionnaire
Revised Survey Questionnaire
NAME OF RATER :
POSITION :
YEARS OF SERVICE :
BRANCH :
PART I.
Instructions: Assign each factor a weight that ranges from 0.0 to 1.0. The weight indicates the
relative importance of that factors to being successful in the firm’s industry. The sum of all the
weights assigned to the factors must equal to 1.0. Write the weight on the weight column.
Assign a rating between 1 and 4 to each key factors to indicate how effectively the firm’s current
strategies respond to the factor where 4=superior, 3=above average, 2=average and 1=poor. Rating
are thus company-based whereas the weights are industry-based. It is important to note both threats
and opportunities can receive a 1,2,3 and 4. Please check mark your rating.
EXTERNAL FACTORS
Assign a rating between 1 and 4 to each key factors to indicate how effectively the firm’s current
strategies respond to the factor where 4=superior, 3=above average, 2=average and 1=poor. Rating
are thus company-based whereas the weights are industry-based. It is important to note both threats
and opportunities can receive a 1,2,3 and 4. Please check mark your rating.
RATING
1 = Highest Rate
5 = Lowest Rate
Rating
POLITICAL ECONOMIC
Tax Policies/Government Regulatory Inflation Rate
Corruption Level Prices of Raw Materials
Trade Control Cost of Labor
Government Stability Prices of Fuel
Level of Government Subsidies Economic Down Turns
Instructions: Assign each factor a weight that ranges from 0.0 (not important) to 1.0 (most
important). Greater weights should be given to those factors which have greater influence on the
organization performance. The sum of all the weights assigned to the factors must equal to 1.0.
Write the weight on the weight column.
Advertising
Price
Competitiveness
Management
Financial
Customer Loyalty
Market Share
Global Expansion
3-B STRATEGIC POSITION AND ACTION EVALUATION (SPACE) MATRIX
Instruction: Assign a numerical value ranging from +1 (worst) to +7 (best) to each of the variables
that make up the Financial Position (FP) and Industry Position (IP).
SPACE MATRIX FACTORS Rating
Cultural diversity
Local produce of key ingredients
Increasing Chinese population in the country by migration/work
Social media advertising
Tourism
Global brand recognition
New products and services
Growth in franchise restaurant
Pricing issues
Increasing number of competitors
Lifestyle/buying habits of customers
Food safety/Food Borne Illnesses
Legal Challenges
Loyal and skilled employees
Strong management team
Expansion
Financial stability and high profits
Brand image
Strategic Location
Corporate culture
Saturated market
High prices of raw materials
Low advertising
No system upgrade
Absence of strategic partner
Return on Investment Skip this
Leverage Skip this
Liquidity Skip this
Working capital Skip this
Cash flow Skip this
Inventory turn-over Skip this
Earnings per share Skip this
Price earnings ratio Skip this
Growth potential
Profit potential
Financial stability
Extend leveraged
Resource utilization
Ease of entry into market
Productivity, capacity utilization
3-C STRATEGIC POSITION AND ACTION EVALUATION(SPACE) MATRIX
Instruction: Assign a numerical value ranging from -1 (best) highly stable to -7 (worst) highly
unstable to each of the variables that make up the Stability Position (SP) and Competitive Position
(CP).
SPACE MATRIX FACTORS Rating
Cultural diversity
Local produce of key ingredients
Increasing Chinese population in the country by migration/work
Social media advertising
Tourism
Global brand recognition
New products and services
Growth in franchise restaurant
Pricing issues
Increasing number of competitors
Lifestyle/buying habits of customers
Food safety/Food Borne Illnesses
Legal Challenges
Loyal and skilled employees
Strong management team
Expansion
Financial stability and high profits
Brand image
Strategic Location
Corporate culture
Saturated market
High prices of raw materials
Low advertising
No system upgrade
Absence of strategic partner
Technological changes
Rate of inflation
Demand variability
Price range of competing products
Barriers to entry into market
Competitive pressure
Ease of exit from market
Risk involved in business
Market share
Product quality
Product life cycle
Customer loyalty
Capacity utilization
Technological know-how
Control over suppliers and distributors
PART IV : PORTER’S FIVE FORCES MODEL
BARGAINING POWER OF 1 2 3 4 5
SUPPLIERS:
Number and size of suppliers
Uniqueness of each supplier’s
product
Focal company’s ability to substitute
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTE 1 2 3 4 5
PRODUCTS:
Number of substitute products
available
Buyer propensity to substitute
Relative price performance of
substitute
Perceived level of product
differentiation
Switching costs
BARGAINING POWER OF 1 2 3 4 5
BUYERS:
Number of customers
Size of each customer order
Differences between competitors
Price sensitivity
Buyer’s ability to substitute
Buyer’s information availability
Switching costs
STRENGTHS NORTHPARK
WEAKNESSES
What areas are you
avoiding?
Where do you lack
resources?
Where are you losing
money?
What needs improvement?
What do customers or
employees complain
about?
Other Weaknesses
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS