Republic of the Philippines

BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY

Gov. Pablo Borbon Campus I
Rizal Avenue Extension, Batangas City

COLLEGE OF LAW
Bachelor of Laws

COURSE SYLLABUS WITH SPECIFICATION

UNIVERSITY VISION
A globally recognized institution of higher learning that develops competent and morally
upright citizens who are active participants in nation building and responsive to the
challenges of 21st century.

UNIVERSITY MISSION
Batangas State University is committed to the holistic development of productive citizens
by providing a conducive learning environment for the generation, dissemination and
utilization of knowledge through innovative education, multidisciplinary research
collaborations, and community partnerships that would nurture the spirit of nationhood
and help fuel national economy for sustainable development.

COURSE CODE: LAW 628

COURSE TITLE: AGENCY, TRUST and PARTNERSHIP
CREDIT UNIT: 3 units
PRE-REQUISITE: Obligations and Contracts
ACADEMIC YEAR:AY: 2019-2020, First Semester
REFERENCE LEBMO: LEBMO No. 5, Series of 2016 and LEBMO No. 1, Series
of 2011

PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

The College of Law is steadfast in its vision of academic excellence. It is rigorous in the
maintenance of academic standards. It is likewise demanding when it comes to faculty
hiring. Thus, the faculty consists of trial judges, seasoned practitioners, and scholars, all
whom possess the work ethic of a competent and dedicated law professor. Just as Rome
was not built in one day, the Batangas State University College of Law is optimistic that,
guided by its vision of academic excellence, it will in due time produce competent and
socially responsible lawyers.

PHILOSOPHY
A course combining the laws on Agency (Title X), Partnership (Title IX) and Trusts (Title
V) of the Civil Code.

AUDIENCE
This course is intended to the third year students who have already completed their
Obligations and Contracts course.

Page 1 of 13
STUDENT OUTCOMES
Student Outcomes
a. Develop clear understanding of basic principles, rules and doctrines 
b. Define and access information needs; assess and organize information 
and knowledge; produce, share, and utilize information and knowledge
c. Apply the basic principles, rules and doctrines to hypothetical and 
actual cases
d. Demonstrate effective lawyering skills 
e. Conduct legal research 
f. Adhere to ethical standards and practices 
g. Know and practice rights and responsibilities and accountabilities in 
the legal profession
h. Engage in lifelong learning and understanding of the need to keep 
abreast of the developments in the legal profession
i. Effectively communicate orally and in writing using both English and 
Filipino
j. Recognize professional, social and ethical responsibility 

INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES

1. Define the basic legal provisions and principles governing agency, partnership
and trust.
2. Identify and discuss concepts in Agency, Partnership and Trust
3. Apply these basic principles, rules and doctrines to hypothetical and actual cases;
and
4. Analyze provisions of existing laws.

RELATIONSHIP TO STUDENT OUTCOMES

Mapping of Intended Learning Outcomes vs Student Outcomes

Intended Applicable Student Outcomes

Learning a b c d e f g h i j
Outcomes
ILO 1          
ILO 2          
ILO 3          
ILO 4          

SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES

Page 2 of 13
 Topics ILO 1 ILO 2 ILO 3 ILO 4
 Nature, Objective and Kinds of Agencies    
 Formalities of Agency    
 Power, Rights and Duties of Agents and    
Principals
 Extinguishment of Agency    
 Nature of Trusts    
 Kinds of Trusts    
 Rules of Prescription for Trusts    
 Nature, Objective and Classes of    
Partners and Partnership
 Rights, Power and Authority of Partners    
 Dtuies and Obigations of Partners    
 Dissolution, Winding-Up & Termination    
 Limited Partnership    

TEACHING, LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES

Teaching and Learning Strategies
In order to attain the intended learning outcomes for this course, the modified Socratic
method of teaching will be utilized throughout the semester. In this method, students
during class discussions will be required to explain principles and doctrines related to the
topics. They will also be required to analyze specific hypothetical cases to apply the
principles and doctrines.

Assessment Strategies
Students will be assessed through recitation, surprised quizzes and written examinations.

COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Quizzes and Major Examinations
As mandated by the university policy on giving of major examinations, the course will
provide major examinations (i.e., prelim, midterm, semi-final, and final examinations) to
measure the cognitive learning of the course. These examinations will be taken on the
scheduled examination dates especially prepared for this seminar-type class by the course
professor. The papers will be checked, recorded, and computed as major examinations.
Examination papers will be returned to students the soonest time possible within the
respective grading period.

Class Participation
Active participation through prescribed and guided activities/requirements is an utmost
goal in this course. The course will delve in group reports, discussions, special readings,
and summary lectures of inclusive topics for the course.

COURSE POLICIES

Grading System
The work of students shall be graded at the end of each term in accordance with the
following system:

Numerical Grade Percentage Equivalent Description

1.00 98-100 Excellent
1.25 94-97 Superior
1.50 90-93 Very Good

Page 3 of 13
 1.75 88-89 Good
2.00 85-87 Meritorious
2.25 83-84 Very Satisfactory
2.50 80-82 Satisfactory
2.75 78-79 Fairly Satisfactory
3.00 75-77 Passing
5.00 Below 75 Failure
Inc. *Incomplete
Drp Dropped

Students who will get a grade of 70-74 must be given a removal examination. A grade of
“3.0’ will be given to those who will pass the removal examination and those who will
fail will be given a grade of “5.0”.

*A grade of “Incomplete” must be complied with by the student within one (1) semester
or one hundred fifty (150) days. A student who fails to complete the
deficiency/deficiencies at the end of the succeeding semester shall automatically obtain a
grade of 5.0 in the course.

Attendance Policy
Prompt and regular attendance of students is required. Total unexcused absences shall not
exceed ten (10) percent of the maximum number of hours required per course per
semester (or per summer term). A semester has 18 weeks. For example, a semestral
subject with :
 3 units (3 hrs lec), 10% x 3 x 18 = 5.4 hrs or 6 hrs.
 3 units (2 hrs lec, 3 hrs lab), 10% x 5 x 18 = 9 hrs.
 5 units (3 hrs lec, 6 hrs lab), 10% x 9 x 18 = 16.2 hrs or 16 hrs.
Please refer to the provisions in the Norms of Conduct for the full text of
guidelines for the attendance.

Missed Exams
In the event a student will miss any of the course requirements, he is solely responsible
for all the course materials/requirements taken in his absence. As a policy of the course,
make-up examination is not given. Grade for the missed major examination due to valid
justification(s) may be considered for a make-up examination.

Academic Dishonesty

Academic dishonesty includes acts such as cheating during examinations or

plagiarism in connection with any academic work. Such acts are considered major
offenses and will be dealt with according to the University’s Student Norms of Conduct.

Dropping

Dropping must be made official by accomplishing a dropping form and submitting it at

the Registrar’s Office before the midterm examination. Students who officially drop out
of class shall be marked “Dropped” whether he took the preliminary examination or not
and irrespective of their preliminary grades.

A student who unofficially drops out of class shall be given a mark of “5.0” by the
instructor.

ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE

References

Page 4 of 13
The references listed in bibliographic entries are lifted from legal references mostly
available in our campus library. All students are encouraged to gain access of these
holdings for better understanding and comprehension of our course. These books are
used as references:

New Civil Code of the Philippines

Cesar Villanueva & Teresa S. Villanueva-Tiansay, Agency & Trusts, Partnerships &
Joint Ventures, 2018 edition
Hector S. De Leon, Comments and Cases on Partnership, Agency and Trusts, latest
edition

Page 5 of 13
TENTATIVE COURSE OUTLINE/CALENDAR

Week Topic/s References

Civil Code
1 Agency, General Concepts Villanueva
De Leon
Civil Code
2 Agency vis-à-vis other contracts Villanueva
De Leon
Civil Code
3-4 Classification of Agency Contracts Villanueva
De Leon
Civil Code
Obligations and Duties of Agents and
5-7 Villanueva
Principals
De Leon
Civil Code
8 Extinguishment of Agency Villanueva
De Leon
9 Midterm Examination
Civil Code
10 Partnership, In General Villanueva
De Leon
Civil Code
11 Kinds of Partnership; of Partners Villanueva
De Leon
Civil Code
Duties and Oblgiations of Partners to
12-14 Villanueva
the Partnership
De Leon
Civil Code
15 Dissolution and Winding Up Villanueva
De Leon
Civil Code
16-17 Trusts Villanueva
De Leon
18 Final Examination

Prepared by:

____________________
Atty. Ma Chere Gracita R. Bilog
Part-time Professor
Date Signed:

Reviewed and Approved by:

____________________
Atty. Edgard E. Valdez
Dean, College of Law
Date Signed

Page 6 of 13
 THE LAW ON AGENCY

I. Introduction
A. How is agency defined? Civil Code, Art. 1868
1. Consent – Arts. 1868, 1869 to 1872, 1898, 1901, 1910, 1317, 1403(1)
a. Express; ratification
b. Implied; ratification
2. Object
3. Consideration – Art. 1875
B. Who are the parties to the contract of agency?
C. Must the parties be capacitated?

Cases:
· Rallos v. Felix Go Chan, 81 SCRA 251
· Orient Air Services v. CA, 197 SCRA 645
· Uy v. CA, 314 SCRA 69
· Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553
· Prudential Bank v. CA, 223 SCRA 350
· Litonjua, Jr. v. Eternit Corp. 490 SCRA 204
· Spouses Viloria v. Continental Airlines, 663 SCRA 57
· Yoshizaki vs. Joy Training Center of Aurora, Inc., G. R. No. 174978, July 31,
2013

II. What is the form of the contract of agency? Arts. 1869, 1874
A. Oral
B. Written

Cases:
· Angeles v. Phil. National Railways, 500 SCRA 444
· Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 378
· City-Lite v. CA, 325 SCRA 385
· Cosmic Lumber v. CA, 265 SCRA 168
· San Juan Structural Steel v. CA, 296 SCRA 631
· De los Reyes v. CA, 313 SCRA 632
· AF Realty v. Dieselman Freight, 373 SCRA 385

III. Who has the obligation to determine existence and scope of agency?
Cases:
· Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19
· Yu Eng Cho v. Pan American, 328 SCRA 717

IV. How is agency distinguished from other contracts/relationships?

A. Master-servant – Arts. 1689 to 1699
B. Employer-employee – Art. 1700
C. Lease of service – Art. 1644
D. Independent contractor – Art. 1713
E. Trust – Art. 1440
F. Sale – Art. 1458
G. Partnership – Art. 1767
H. Negotiorum gestio/quasi-contract – Arts. 2144, 2145
I. Judicial administrator
J. Broker

Cases:
· Sevilla v. CA, 160 SCRA 171
· Shell v. Firemen’s Insurance Co., 100 Phil. 757
· De la Cruz v. Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil. 739

Page 7 of 13
 · Nielson & Co. v. Lepanto Consolidated, 26 SCRA 540
· Quiroga v. Parsons Hardware, 38 Phil. 501
· Gonzalo Puyat & Sons v. Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil. 402
· Lim v. People, 133 SCRA 333
· Pacific Commercial v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 398
· Ker v. Lingad, 38 SCRA 524Hahn v. CA, 266 SCRA 537

V. Classifications of agency contracts

A. Express agency; implied agency
B. Agency by estoppel; no consent – Arts. 1900, 1911, 1921, 1922
C. Agency by operation of law – Arts. 1869, 1884(2), 1930, 1931
D. Universal, general and special – Art. 1876
E. Durable agency – Art. 1930
F. Couched in general terms; couched in specific terms – Arts. 1877 to 1880
1. Mortgage – Art. 1878(12)
2. Loan/borrow – Art. 1878(7)
3. Sell – Art. 1878(5)
4. Lease – Art. 1878(8)
5. Compromise – Art. 1878(3)
6. Other acts of strict dominion – Art. 1878(12)
Cases:
Siasat v. IAC, 139 SCRA 238
Dominion Insurance v. CA, 376 SCRA 239
Republic v. Bañez, G.R. No. 169442, October 14, 2015
PNB v. Sta. Maria, 29 SCRA 303
Bank of PI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 594
Hodges v. Salas, 63 Phil. 567
Strong v. Gutierrez Repide, 6 Phil. 680
Katigbak v. Tai Hung Co., 52 Phil. 622
Bautista-Spille v. NICORP Management and Development Corp., G.R. No. 214057,
October 19, 2015
Chua v. IAC, 229 SCRA 99
Dungo v. Lopena, 6 SCRA 1007
Vicente v. Geraldez, 52 SCRA 210
Insular Drug Co. v. National Bank, 58 Phil. 684

VI. Obligations and liabilities of agents to their principals

A. Act within scope of authority – Arts. 1879, 1880, 1881, 1882, 1887
B. Carry out the agency – Arts. 1884, 1928, 1929
C. Not to carry out the agency – Art. 1888
D. Loyalty – Art. 1889, 1890, 1491
E. Diligence – Arts. 1885, 1887, 1909
F. Account/deliver – Art. 1891
G. Solidary liability – Arts. 1894, 1895
H. Pay interest – Art. 1896
I. Fraud; negligence – Art. 1909
J. Specific obligations of commission agents – Arts. 1903 to 1908
Cases:
Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 527
PNB v. Manila Surety, 14 SCRA 776
Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131
Severino v. Severino, 44 Phil. 343
Green Valley Poultry v. IAC, 133 SCRA 697
Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil. 290
Abacus Securities v. Ampil, 438 SCRA 315
Oliver v. Philippine Savings Bank and Castro, G.R. No. 214567, April 4, 2016

Page 8 of 13
VII. Responsibility for acts of substitutes – Arts. 1892, 1893
Cases:
Del Rosario v. La Badenia, 33 Phil. 316
International Films v. Lyric Film, 63 Phil. 778
Villa v. Garcia-Gosque, 49 Phil 126
Serona v. Court of Appeals, 392 SCRA 35

VIII. Obligations and liabilities of agents to third parties

A. Agent acting within scope of authority – Arts. 1883, 1897, 1899
B. Agent acting outside of authority – Arts. 1897, 1898, 1911
1. With notice to third parties – Art. 1901
2. Without notice to third parties
C. Agent acting in his own name; exception – Art. 1883
Cases:
PNB v. Agudelo, 58 Phil. 655
Philippine Products v. Primateria, 15 SCRA 301
NPC v. National Merchandising, 117 SCRA 789
National Bank & Welch Fairchild, 44 Phil. 780
Tuazon v. Orosco, 5 Phil 596
Eugenio v. Court of Appeals, 239 SCRA 207
Cervantes v. CA, 304 SCRA 25
Bank of the Philippine Islands, et al. v. Laingo, G.R. No. 205206, March 16, 2016
Smith Bell v. Sotelo, 44 Phil. 874
Rural Bank of Bombon v. CA, 212 SCRA 25
Sy-Juco v. Sy-Juco, 40 Phil. 634
National Food Authority v. IAC, 184 SCRA 166
Gold Star Mining v. Lim Jimenez, 25 SCRA 597
Bacaltos Coal Mines v. Court of Appeals, 245 SCRA 460

IX. Obligations and liabilities of principals to agents

A. Advance/reimburse – Arts. 1912, 1914, 1918
B. Indemnify – Art. 1913
C. Solidary liability – Art. 1915
D. Compensation – Art. 1875
E. Agent’s lien – Art. 1914
Cases:
Macondray v. Sellner, 33 Phil. 370
Danon v. Brim & Co., 42 Phil. 133
Rocha v. Prats, 43 Phil 397
Inland Realty v. CA, 273 SCRA 70
Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 691
Prats v. CA, 81 SCRA 360
Uniland Resources v. DBP, 200 SCRA 757

X. Obligations of principals to third parties

A. Agent acting within scope of authority – Arts. 1883, 1910, 1917
B. Agent acting outside scope of authority – Arts. 1900, 1911, 1916, 1917
C. For crimes; for torts
Cases:
Gonzalez v. Haberes, 47 Phil. 380
Spouses Salvador v. Spouses Rabaja, G.R. No. 199990, February 4, 2015
Nantes v. Madriguera, 42 Phil 389
Manila Remnants v. CA, 191 SCRA 622
De Castro v. CA, 384 SCRA 607

XI. Duty of third parties dealing with agent – Art. 1902

Page 9 of 13
XII. Extinguishment of Agency
A. Revocation; agency coupled with an interest – Arts. 1873, 1919 to 1927
B. Withdrawal – Arts. 1919, 1928, 1929
C. Death; agency coupled with an interest – Arts. 1919, 1930 to 1932
D. Dissolution of the firm/corporation
E. Accomplishment of the object/purpose
F. Expiration of the period
G. Civil interdiction, insanity, insolvency
Cases:
Barreto v. Sta. Maria, 26 Phil. 440
Dialosa v. CA, 130 SCRA 350
New Manila v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824
Valenzuela v. CA, 191 SCRA 1
Dy Buncio v. Ong Guan, 60 Phil. 606
Garcia v. De Manzano, 39 Phil. 577
Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269
Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Diabu, 20 Phil 321
Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 648
Caleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577
Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil 695
Pasno v. Ravina, 54 Phil 378
Ramon v. Caoibes, 94 Phil. 440
Herrera v. Luy Kim Guan, 1 SCRA 406
Guardez v NLRC, 191 SCRA 487

THE LAW ON PARTNERSHIP

I. In General
A. Definition; essential features – Art. 1767
B. Creation – Arts. 1770, 1771, 1772, 1784, 1815, Code of Professional Responsibility
Rule 3.02, Art. 1411
C. Separate juridical personality – Arts. 1768, 1775; National Internal Revenue Code Sec.
22(b), NIRC Sec. 26; Art. 1811 par. (2)
D. Mutual agency – Arts. 1803, 1818, 1819, 1820, 1821, 1822, 1825; Revised Rules of
Court, Rule 130, Sec. 29; 1997 Revised Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 14, Section 11;
Arts. 1800, 1801, 1802, 1832, 1833, 1834
E. Distinguish from:
1. Co-ownership; co-possession
2. Tenancy in common; joint tenancy
3. Joint ventures
4. Joint adventures
5. Joint accounts
6. Cuentas en participación
7. Agency, Arts. 1769, 1825, Arts. 239-243, Code of Commerce
Cases:
Lyons v. Rosentock, 56 Phil 632
Agad v. Mabato, 23 SCRA 1223
Torres v. CA, 320 SCRA 428
Arbes v. Polistico, 53 Phil. 489
Tocao v. CA, 342 SCRA 20
Aguila v. CA, 319 SCRA 246
Tan v. Del Rosario, 237 SCRA 324
Mendiola v. CA, 497 SCRA 346
Angeles v. Secretary of Justice, 465 SCRA 106
Gatchalian v. CIR, 67 Phil 666
Pascual v. CIR, 166 SCRA 560
Obillos v. CIR, 139 SCRA 436
Tuason v. Bolanos, 95 Phil 106

Page 10 of 13
Heirs of Tan Eng Kee v. CA, 341 SCRA 740
Aurbach v. Sanitary Wares, 180 SCRA 130
Litonjua v. Litonjua, 477 SCRA 576
Sevilla v. CA, 160 SCRA 171
Philex Mining Corp v. CIR, 551 SCRA 428

II. Kinds of partnership

A. Universal – Arts. 1776 – 1782, 739
B. Particular – Arts. 1776, 1783
C. General – Art. 1776
D. Limited – Art. 1776E. At will – Art. 1785
F. For a term or undertaking – Art. 1785
G. Commercial – Art. 1767
H. Professional – Art. 1767
I. By estoppel/apparent – Art. 1825
Case:Ortega v. CA, 245 SCRA 529

III. Kinds of partners

A. Industrial – Arts. 1789, 1797
B. Capitalist – Arts. 1789, 1790, 1797, 1808
C. Managing – Arts. 1792, 1800, 1801, 1802
D. By estoppel – Art. 1825

IV. Partner’s obligations to the partnership

A. To contribute; warrant – Arts. 1786, 1787, 1788, 1790, 1791, 1795
B. To apply sums collected pro rata – Art. 1792
C. To compensate – Art. 1794
D. To be loyal; fiduciary duty – Art. 1807
Cases:
Lim Tanhu v. Remolete, 66 SCRA 425
Liwanag v. CA, 281 SCRA 225
US v. Clarin, 17 Phil 84
Pang Lim v. Lo Seng, 42 Phil 282
Catalan v. Gatchalian, 105 Phil 1270

V. Partner’s obligations inter se

A. To bring to collation – Art. 1793
B. To share in the profits/losses – Arts. 1797, 1798, 1799
C. To render true and full information – Art. 1806
D. Not to engage in another business – Arts. 1789, 1808
Cases:
Pioneer Insurance v. CA, 175 SCRA 668
Evangelista v. Abad Santos, 51 SCRA 416
Moran v. CA, 133 SCRA 88
Martinez v. Ong Pong Co, 14 Phil 726
Agustin v. Inocencio, 9 Phil 134
Soncuya v. De Luna, 67 Phil 646

VI. Partner’s obligations to personal and partnership creditors; third parties

A. To have his partnership interest charged for personal debts (primary) Arts. 1814, 1827
B. To be liable pro rata for partnership debts (subsidiary & joint) – Arts. 1816, 1817,
1835
C. Tort liability; breach of trust liability (primary & solidary) – Arts. 1822 to 1824
D. Liability in case of estoppel – Art. 1825; Corporation Code, Sec. 21
E. Liability of new partners (subsidiary) – Art. 1826
Cases:
In re: SyCip, 92 SCRA 1

Page 11 of 13
Litton v. Hill, 67 Phil 509
Goquiolay v. Sycip, 9 SCRA 663
Goquiolay v. Sycip, 108 Phil 947
MacDonald v. National City Bank, 99 Phil 156
Compañia Maritima v. Munoz, 9 Phil 326
Co-Pitco v. Yulo, 8 Phil 544
Pacific Commercial v. Aboitiz, 48 Phil 841
Magdusa v. Albaran, 5 SCRA 511
Island Sales v. United, 65 SCRA 554
Muñasque v. CA, 139 SCRA 533
Lim Tong Lim v. Philippine Fishing Gear, Inc. 317 SCRA 728
Bachrach v. La Protectora, 37 Phil 441
Guy v. Gacott, G.R. No. 206147, January 13, 2016

VII. Rights of a partner

A. To associate another in his share – Art. 1804
B. To access, inspect and copy partnership books – Art. 1805
C. To have a formal account – Arts. 1809, 1842
D. Property rights – Art. 1810
1. To possess specific partnership property – Art. 1811
2. To convey partnership interest – Arts. 1812, 1813
E. To ask for dissolution – Arts. 1830 (2), 1831
Cases:
Emnace v. CA, 370 SCRA 431
Dan Fue Leung v. IAC, 169 SCRA 746

VIII. Partnership’s obligations to the partners

A. To reimburse; to answer for obligations contracted – Art. 1796
Cases:
Martinez v. Ong Pong, 14 Phil 726
Agustin v. Inocencio, 9 Phil 134

IX. Rights of assignees

A. To receive the interest – Art. 1813
B. To require an account – Art. 1813
C. To ask for dissolution – Art. 1831

X. Dissolution & Winding Up

A. Dissolution; winding up; termination – Arts. 1828, 1829
B. Causes of dissolution
1. Without violating the agreement – Art. 1830(1)
2. In contravention of the agreement – Art. 1830(2)
3. By operation of law – Art. 1830(3)-(7)
4. By court decree – Arts. 1830(8), 1831
C. Effects of dissolutionPartnership
1. Termination of mutual agency; exceptions – Arts. 1832, 1833, 1834
D. Right to wind up – 1836
E. Settling of accounts/application of properties/sharing of profits & losses – Arts. 1797,
1798, 1799, 1827, 1837, 1838
F. Effects of rescission – Arts. 1838, 1839
G. Effects of continuation of the business – Arts.1840, 1841
H. Prescription of action – Arts. 1153, 1144
Cases:
Idos v. CA, 296 SCRA 194
Ortega v. CA, 245 SCRA 529Rojas v. Maglana, 192 SCRA 110Lichauco v. Lichauco, 33
Phil 350Bearneza v. Dequilla, 43 Phil 237Singson v. Isabela Sawmill, 88 SCRA 623
Bonnevie v. Hernandez, 95 Phil 175Yu v. NLRC, 224 SCRA 75Sunga-Chan v. CA, 555

Page 12 of 13
SCRA 275Primelink Properties v. Lazatin-Magat, 493 SCRA 444

XI. Limited Partnership – Arts. 1843 to 1867

Case:
Najim v. De Mesa, SEC-SICD Case No. 2526, September 21, 1987

TRUSTS

I. In General – Articles 1440 to 1442

Cases
Salao vs. Salao, 70 SCRA 65 [1976]
De Leon vs. Molo-Peckson, 6 SCRA 978
Government vs. Abadilla, 46 Phil. 642
Cristobal vs. Gomez, 50 Phil. 810
Araneta vs. Perez, 5 SCRA 338
Mindanao Development Authority vs. Court of Appeals, 113 SCRA 429
Roa, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, 123 SCRA 3
Perez vs. Araneta, 4 SCRA 430

II. Kinds
A. Express Trust – Articles 1443 to 1446
B. Implied Trust – Articles 1447 to 1457
Cases
Cuaycong vs. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192
Sinaon vs. Soroñgon, 136 SCRA 407
O’Laco vs. Co Cho Chit, 220 SCRA 656
Special Services Corporation vs. Centro La Paz, 121 SCRA 748
Chiao Liong Tan vs. Court of Appeals, 228 SCRA 75
Homena vs. Casa, 157 SCRA 232
Heirs of Candelaria vs. Romero, 109 Phil. 500
PNB vs. CA, 217 SCRA 347
Diaz v Gorricho and Aguado, 103 Phil 261

Page 13 of 13