Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rhetorical Analysis Draft 2 - Michael Duquesnel 1
Rhetorical Analysis Draft 2 - Michael Duquesnel 1
A rhetorical situation is an event of communication between two separate parties. The Commented [LG1]: Is it always between two separate
parties? It certainly can be! But can it be between more
or less?
different parts of a rhetorical situation include the rhetor or author, the audience, the constraints
on the communications, and the exigence or reason for which the communication is happening.
Rhetorical situations occur in any piece of communication whether we are aware of it our not.
For this rhetorical analysis, I will be analyzing a script that I wrote for a film project for
my Modern Thought and Literature class back in the Spring of 2018. The script was titled “Can
You Survive a Horror Movie?” and was a horror-comedy about a group of friends who love to
watch horror movies. One of the guys claims that surviving a horror movie would be pretty
simple, so the rest of the group puts him to the test to see if surviving a horror movie is really as
easy as it sounds. The script was around fifteen pages long and was written in a script format,
similar to what they use in Hollywood. Commented [LG2]: Nice, strong, and brief intro and
summary of the writing experience!
Rhetor Formatted: Left
The rhetor for this situation is me. I was tasked with creating a movie for our final
project. This project would represent what I had learned in the class and my ability to put that
into practice. When creating the script for this movie, I pulled on the knowledge of the horror-
comedy genre and took some inspiration from some of my favorites. Movies like Edgar Wright’s
Shaun of the Dead and Wes Craven’s Scream served as some great examples of how to make an
effective horror-comedy. With a few watches of these films, I picked up on enough tropes to
skillfully apply them to my own writing style. Commented [LG3]: Another strong paragraph that
gives enough detail to progress your analysis and keep
the essay focused on the overall rhetorical situation.
Audience
Formatted: Left
Duquesnel 2
The audience for this project was just the cast and crew who helped in making this script Commented [LG4]: Might you discuss your primary and
secondary audience? While the actors and crew were
the only ones to read the script as you wrote it, you
become reality. The goal of writing this script was to communicate clearly to the actors on how might mention that you wrote the script for the cast and
crew to interpret but also for the viewers or evaluators
their characters should be acting and how the scenes should flow. Without any descriptions and of your movie.
so they would understand what the vision of the film looked like.
The main person in which this project was written for was my teacher, Mr. Bowen, who
would be grading the finished movie. Mr. Bowen was an opinionated man who loved making his
voice and perspective known, and usually, that opinion was incredibly negative. He loved to tell
students that their projects were not up to par, which added some sort of narcissistic enjoyment
to grading projects. This would prove to be a daunting task for me, but I would try to meet his
high expectations in order to please him. Commented [LG5]: Can you give any specific things or
actions you took to try to meet his expectations? What
impact did his role as the audience have over your
Constraints writing choices?
Like all school projects, this one had a specific due date. With that deadline in mind, the
script had to be written quickly, as we could not start filming until the script was written in full.
This led to me as the rhetor to not have enough time to fully flesh out all aspects of the story that
I wished to. Revisions to the script were to be kept to a minimum as there was not an ample
amount of time for them. This would, in the end, have a lasting impact on how the quality of the
finished movie project would turn out. Commented [LG6]: Will you share that impact here or
later in the essay?
The overall guidelines for what the finished product should look like was also a
constraint on this project. The video would have to total at least ten minutes in length. This
meant that the script itself had to reach a certain length so that the film would be long enough.
Duquesnel 3
The film would also have to incorporate aspects of other films from the genre, to show that I, the
rhetor, had a firm understanding of that particular genre. Commented [LG7]: Can you analyze this connection a
bit more (author and constraints)? You gave a little
background information on how you watched movies to
Exigence understand the genre better, what else can you discuss
to connect these two elements and demonstrate that?
The reasons for communication between myself and the cast and crew for the project Commented [LG8]: Is this why you wrote the script
though? The exigence should be your exigence on the
writing as a whole so your purpose and motivations in
were to effectively communicate the vision I had for this film. Without this communication, the creating the script which was a school project. While
you needed to communicate with the cast and crew to
entire project would have seemed scatterbrained, and in the end, would take a longer amount of be successful, was that your exigence for writing?
time to finish the film. I wished to give the cast better ideas for their characters by explaining
each of their personalities on paper so they could have something to refer to during the filming
process. Also, with the camera angles and stage directions already written in the script, it would
lead to a better understanding for the crew and would help to streamline the process.
Final Thoughts
This writing experience overall was one of the more fun and creative experiences that I
have done. I thoroughly enjoyed each and every constraint put on me with the specific guidelines
for the project and also trying to impress my audience. As the rhetor, this allowed me to push
myself into becoming a better writer and work on my communication skills through this
rhetorical situation.
For your next draft, continue to deepen your analysis elements and build on the connections