Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A disease can spread rapidly among chickens because they are usually kept together in a cage or chicken house.
They also share the same food and water bowls, which can spread disease and infections from sick to healthy
chickens.
In an intensive system we place a great deal of pressure on the chickens to grow fast and to lay many eggs. This
situation can cause disease to spread resulting in a lot of damage because of the stress the chickens experience
Management
Environment
Consult your animal health technician or veterinarian to help you find a correct
solution to your problem as soon as possible
Call your animal health technician or veterinarian. They will kill some of the sick
chickens and cut them open. They will also cut open dead chickens and take samples.
They may take blood or egg samples, depending on the disease. The samples taken will be sent to a
laboratory.
You and your animal health technician or veterinarian should then go through the
entire system to identify possible problems in the management and environment that
can be corrected
GENERAL TREATMENT
There are not many forms of treatment or in certain cases no treatment for some diseases, which is why
prevention is so important
The treatment will depend on the cause of the disease
If it is at all possible, try to separate all sick chickens from the healthy ones daily. The sick chickens should
be handled and treated last to prevent the spread of the disease
Correct management problems
GENERAL PREVENTION
Diseases can be prevented through management, environmental and chicken factors
Management
Apply correct methods for raising young chicks (temperature, food, water, bedding)
Disinfect and clean the housing of the different groups of chicks
Maintain the correct stocking density (avoid over-crowding)
Use the best-quality food that is available and provide clean water daily
Use bedding that is not dusty
Prevent the buildup of gases by cleaning and ventilation
Control rats and flies
Ensure that no people from outside your farm visit the chicken house
Have bird-proof houses to keep out wild birds that eat the food and bring diseases to your chickens
Environment
Ensure that the building or house you are going to use is large enough for the chickens
Fix leaky watertroughs
Feed and waterbowls should be cleaned daily and fresh food and water should be supplied
Houses should be warm in winter and cool in summer and well ventilate
Dust causes irritation of the respiratory tract and the environment must therefore not be dusty
Use cages for laying hens that do not have sharp edges that can injure the hens. Make sure that there is
sufficient space per hen
Chickens
DIARRHOEA
Signs in sick chickens
Diarrhoea (also known as scours or dirty vent). The stool or droppings of the chickens
are not firm but very loose, watery, not of the normal colour and may contain blood.
This may cause the feathers of the vent to be soiled and caked together
Depression
Reluctance to eat, drink and move about
Poor growth
Death
Poor condition
The intestines may be red and swollen and the contents watery
There may also be a yellow butter-like substance around the heart, liver and intestines
Causes
There are many different types of organisms that can cause diarrhoea, which include:
Treatment
Use an antibiotic or coccidiostatic drug in the water that was recommended by the animal health technician
or veterinarian in the water for 3 to 5 days.
Stress preparations that contain electrolytes, vitamins and minerals can be added to the water.
The sinuses of the chicken (the area between the eye and the beak) are swollen. These may be swollen in
such a way that the eyes are closed.
Tears and wetness often occur around the eyes and nostrils. The discharge from the nostrils may look like
clear water in the early stages but can become cloudy and yellow when secondary bacterial infections cause
complications.
Sneezing
Coughing
Difficulty in breathing. They breathe with an open beak and you can hear a snoring or clicking sound
Loss of appetite
Weakness
Weight loss
Causes
There are many different types of organisms that can cause disease in the upper respiratory tract. These include:
Mycoplasma
Bacteria (E. coli, Pasteurella, Haemophilus)
Viruses (Newcastle disease, influenza, infectious bronchitis, infectious laryngotracheitis)
Parasites (mites and worms)
Fungi (Aspergillus)
Treatment
Use an antibiotic drug that was recommended by your animal health technician or veterinarian in the water
for 3 to 5 days
Stress preparations that contain electrolytes, vitamins and minerals can be added to the water
Signs may vary, but usually chickens lie down because they cannot stand up
They also walk with a limp or are reluctant to move
Nervous signs may include staring into the sky, not knowing where they are, pulling the head and neck
over their backs, paralysis
Sores on the breast muscles from lying down
Causes
There are many different types of organisms that can cause nervous signs and lameness. These include:
Treatment
A complete hygiene and disinfection programme should be planned together with the animal health
technician or veteri- narian
Antibiotics will only be effective against bacteria and can be used as recommended. If it is a viral disease,
such as Newcastle disease, urgent steps have to be taken to prevent possible spread because it causes
serious production losses
Causes
There are many different types of organisms that can cause a drop in egg production or quality. These include:
Treatment
Your animal health technician or veterinarian may recom- mend a short course of antibiotics but usually it
may only help for bacterial infections
Adding vitamins and minerals to the water or feed may help
NEWCASTLE DISEASE
Newcastle disease is probably the most important disease for poultry farmers around the world. This is a
production disease that causes a large number of deaths in chickens and huge losses to farmers and the
industry
Because there is no treatment and the disease spreads so quickly, sick chickens should be slaughtered
immediately
This disease is caused by a virus
A large number of chickens will die suddenly without any of the following apparent causes:
o Depression
o Nervous signs
o Sneezing, swollen eyes, difficulty in breathing
o Diarrhoea
o Death
Treatment
There is NO treatment for the disease and all the chickens may die within a few days.
Very few chickens survive
It is best to prevent the diseases by good management and a vaccination programme
Your animal health technician or veterinarian will give you the best advice in a
Newcastle disease outbreak, especially as this is a controlled disease
Prevention
You should vaccinate all the chickens against this disease by using a good vaccination programme before
any signs appear
It is a very contagious disease, which means it spreads easily to other farms. You should not visit your
neighbours without washing and putting on new clothes and shoes. You should also recommend that your
neighbours vaccinate their chickens as soon as possible
You should clean the chicken house thoroughly with soap and water. All equipment must be washed.
Everything should then be disinfected. You should also wash and disinfect your clothes and shoes. All
chicken litter or dead chickens should be burned to prevent the spread of the disease
AUSVETPLAN
The Australian strategy is to eradicate the virulent disease by immediate
culling and disposal of infected and in-contact birds to remove the major
source of the virus. Additionally, there will be strict quarantine and
movement controls to prevent the spread of infection, decontamination to
remove and destroy the virus, tracing and surveillance to locate the source
of infection, locate other infected premises and determine the extent of the
infection and zoning to define infected and disease-free areas. Vaccination
may be an option in some circumstances and provisions have been made for
emergency vaccine supplies to be available for use in Australia. The current
Emergency Animal Disease Response Agreement applies to both HPAI and
LPAI outbreaks (see AUSVETPLAN – Avian Influenza). Government and the
poultry industries share the costs of eradication under the Emergency
Animal Disease Response Agreement, which is administered by Animal
Health Australia.
H5N1 virus
The spreading Asia outbreak is unprecedented in recent history. The H5N1
virus was first detected in China in 1996 and the infection spread to other
eastern Asian countries in 2003 and evolved to produce severe disease and
deaths in domestic and wild water birds, which is an unusual feature for AI
viruses. Altogether more than 150 million domestic birds have died or been
killed in the attempt to control AI infection in eastern Asia. In mid-2005, the
infection spread eastwards to countries bordering the Black Sea with
infection occurring in both wild birds and poultry. In early 2006, H5N1
infection spread to Nigeria, India and Egypt in poultry and to many
countries in Europe with deaths in wild birds, particularly swans.
Significance of AI outbreaks
Since 1997 when H5N1 virus was shown to infect humans in Hong Kong,
there has been increasing concern about HPAI poultry outbreaks. With more
than 170 confirmed human infections and over 90 deaths in Asia, the World
Health Organisation (WHO) is concerned about a pandemic of human
influenza arising from mutation(s) of the poultry virus or its recombination
with a human influenza virus that will enable the virus to infect and spread
between people easily.
Recently the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) has redefined avian
influenza infection as both HPAI and LPAI viruses of the H5 and H7
subtypes and in so doing indicated there is a need to control both LPAI and
HPAI infections in domestic poultry and other domestic birds. It is not
practical to control AI infections in wild bird populations and it is
recommended that action not be taken to control infection in these species
when outbreaks occur.
Avian influenza in poultry and impact on the poultry industries
The clinical signs of infection with HPAI virus are variable and can be
affected by the existence of other diseases, the age of the birds, the
environment and the severity of the virus itself. In very severe forms the
disease appears suddenly and birds die quickly. Some may appear
depressed, egg production falls and softshelled eggs are produced. There
may be profuse watery diarrhoea, combs and wattles may become blue and
respiration may be laboured. With less virulent forms of HPAI, the clinical
signs may include decreased egg production, depression, respiratory signs
suggestive of a cold, swelling of the face, possibly some nervous signs and
diarrhoea. With LPAI, there may be no clinical signs seen following infection
or mild signs relating to the respiratory, alimentary or reproductive systems
may be seen.
Spread of infection
CANNIBALISM
Pecking is the natural means by which poultry investigate their
surroundings and establish a stable social order, however this behaviour
can escalate to the stage where birds will literally peck each other to death
(cannibalism). All forms of commercial poultry can experience cannibalism
as it a behavioural problem that can develop into a habit that will persist
and spread within a flock as a learned behaviour, even after the initial
causes of the behaviour have been corrected.
What causes cannibalism?
Cannibalism often starts as feather pulling or picking while the birds are
only a few weeks old, or as investigative pecking at any age. These
behaviours can escalate to aggressive pecking, particularly if injury occurs.
Scientific study has shown that any stressor (or combination of stressors)
can trigger this behaviour and can lead to serious aggressive pecking and
cannibalism.
These stressors include crowding, bright light intensity, high room
temperature, poor ventilation, high humidity, low salt, trace nutrient
deficiency, insufficient feeding or drinking space, nervous and excitable
birds (hereditary), external parasites, access to sick or injured birds, stress
from moving, boredom and idleness, housing birds of different appearance
together and birds prolapsing during egg-laying.
Prevention and treatment of cannibalism
As cannibalism can become a learned behaviour it can be difficult to treat
once it has started in a flock. Therefore prevention should be the main aim
and as such, good husbandry practices should aim to minimise the
stressors listed above as potential causes for cannibalism. Some strains of
birds have been shown to have a higher tendency towards developing
aggressive pecking behaviour and therefore strains that are more placid
should be preferred.
The broad range of factors that can trigger cannibalism can make it very
difficult for management to control all of these factors for the entire life of
the flock. Bright light is a known factor that leads to cannibalism but
control of lighting levels in some poultry housing systems can be very
difficult, if not impossible (such as in free range systems). Where outbreaks
of cannibalism have occurred in a flock, or where there is a reasonable
concern that management strategies can not be guaranteed to prevent an
outbreak, then beak trimming of the birds may be used as a control
measure. Trimming of the sharp tip of the upper, and sometimes also lower,
beak reduces the damage that is caused by aggressive pecking. Further
information on the practice of beak trimming can be found in the section
on Beak Trimming.
The spread of the behaviour may be able to be controlled if the injured and
aggressive birds can be rapidly identified and removed from the flock.
Provision of escape areas may also help in floor-housed flocks. Other control
methods that have been tested include the use of spectacles to prevent
forward vision, bits that prevent complete closure of the beak and coloured
contact lenses to prevent the identification of blood on another bird.
There is evidence that cannibalism may be alleviated through the use of
high fibre diets. It is believed that high fibre diets enhance gut development
and gizzard function, which in turn help reduce aggressive behaviour in
hens.
E. praecox E. tenella
E. necatrix
Methods of Control
Eimeria are present world-wide, and are ubiquitous under intensive farming
methods. Up to six species have been shown to occur simultaneously on one
farm. The omni-present nature of Eimeria precludes eradication as a
practical option for control. Since species-specific immunity develops
rapidly, the management of coccidiosis aims to achieve a balance between
allowing natural immunity to build up and preventing high oocyst exposure
to naïve birds. Hygiene, anticoccidial drugs and vaccines all play major
roles.
Symptoms
Signs of colibacillosis are respiratory distress, reduced appetite and poor
growth. Lesions seen at post mortem are airsacculitis, pericarditis,
perihepatitis and peritonitis. Figures 1, 2 and 3 illustrate the clear airsac of
an uninfected bird, the foamy exudate seen early in infection, and the
caseous exudate later in infection.
Lice and mites are common external parasites of poultry. Lice are
insects, while mites belong to the same family as spiders. There are a large
number of lice and mite species that can infest poultry under the
appropriate conditions. They are either blood-suckers or live on dry skin
scales, feathers or scabs on the skin. Adults can survive for 4-5 days away
from the host. Therefore, infestation can be spread by direct contact
between birds but also through contact with infested litter etc. They are
more common and difficult to control in floor-based housing systems than
in cage systems. Symptoms of infestation can include scratching, poor
feather condition, unthriftiness, nervous behaviour and anaemia can occur
with severe blood-sucking infestations.
Skin lesions caused by chicken mite Source: The Merck Veterinary Manual
Skin lesions caused by scaly leg mite (Knemidocoptes mutans) Source: The
Merck Veterinary Manual
Flocks should be kept away from backyard or wild birds and individual
birds examined regularly for adult parasites and eggs. Infestations can be
treated with appropriate chemical pesticides, either as dry powders or liquid
sprays. Effective biosecurity procedures such as an all-in/all-out clean out
between flocks will help manage these pests.
Skin lesions from Marek’s disease Source: The Merck Veterinary Manual
There is no treatment for MD. Vaccination is the central strategy for the
prevention and control of MD. While vaccination will prevent clinical disease
and reduce shedding of infective virus it will not prevent infection. Cell-
associated vaccines are generally more effective than cell-free vaccines
because they are neutralised less by maternal antibodies. Over time,
increasingly virulent strains of MD virus have emerged, which has resulted
in an ongoing need to develop new vaccines and vaccination programs to
combat the disease. It was found that better protection from MD was
obtained when certain combinations of serotypes were used together in a
vaccine rather than one serotype alone (protective synergism). This
phenomena, which is unique to MD and is strongly serotype specific, has led
to the development of polyvalent vaccines (vaccines containing more than
one vaccine strain). The efficacy of vaccines can be improved by strict
sanitation to reduce or delay exposure and by breeding poultry for genetic
resistance to MD. Vertical transmission (from parents to offspring) is not
considered to be important. Vaccines administered at hatching require 1-2
weeks to produce an effective immunity, therefore exposure of chickens
vaccinated at hatching to virus should be minimised during the first few
days after hatching. Vaccines are also effective when administered to
embryos at the 18th day of incubation. In ovo vaccination (vaccination of the
embryo prior to hatching) is now performed by automated technology and is
widely used for vaccination of commercial broiler chickens, mainly because
of reduced labour costs and greater precision of vaccine administration.
The history of Marek’s Disease control in Australia
In the early 1970’s, the success of vaccination against MD became apparent
in other countries but Australian quarantine restrictions prevented the
importation of any international vaccines. This necessitated the
development of a local vaccine. In 1974, field trials began using an
Australian isolate of herpesvirus of turkeys (HVT). This serotype 3 vaccine
was shown to be safe and gave an overall protection of 85.2%, which
compared favourably with results reported in other countries. Vaccination
with this strain was very effective and controlled MD in Australia until about
1980. HVT is generally produced as a cell-associated form of vaccine. A cell-
free form also exists but is less protective than its cell-associated
counterpart.
Despite the availability of serotype 1 and 2 vaccines in other countries, HVT
was the most commonly used vaccine throughout the world until the late
1970’s when MD outbreaks of increasing severity were reported in
vaccinated chickens. Viruses isolated at this time were classified as very
virulent Marek’s Disease viruses (vvMDV). The discovery of protective
synergism (better protection when combinations of serotypes were used
together in a vaccine rather than each serotype alone) between Marek’s
Disease vaccines prompted the use of bivalent vaccines (a mixture of two
vaccine strains) containing serotypes 2 and 3.
The importation of breeding stock coincided with increased problems from
Marek’s disease in the Australian poultry industry Source: Australian Egg
Corporation Limited
MD continued to be widespread in Australia, with disease outbreaks despite
vaccination programs during the 1980’s. Consequently, an Australian cell-
associated serotype 2 vaccine “Maravac”, which was licensed for sale in
1977, was used alternatively with HVT or in combination.
In the early 1990’s, despite the use of Maravac, polyvalent vaccines and
increased doses of HVT, an increase in the prevalence of MD was once again
observed. During this time, imported breeds of chickens became available in
Australia. The influx of imported pullets into Australia coincided with
increases in MD mortality to over 50%, which had never been seen
previously in Australia. Field and breed comparison trials demonstrated that
imported breeds were responding poorly to Australian-derived MD vaccines.
The incidence of MD in imported breeds appeared to be higher than in
existing Australian strains of birds.
In view of this situation, and the emergence of strains of increased
virulence, changes in vaccination strategies included the vaccination of
broiler chickens, previously not routine practice in Australia.
Due to concern from the Australian poultry industry over the apparent
failure of Australian vaccines, a meeting was convened by the vaccine
manufacturer, Websters, and the Australian Veterinary Poultry Association
(AVPA) in 1993, where the industry reported to the government and vaccine
manufacturers the full extent of MD in Australia. Websters proposed that a
serotype 1 vaccine be imported from overseas. This option was unpopular
with the majority of the poultry industry and instead, the industry decided
to increase its funding of MD research, particularly aimed at providing
evidence that a serotype 1 vaccine would give better protection than existing
Australian vaccines and to develop an Australian serotype 1 vaccine. An
Australian serotype 1 vaccine was developed by RMIT with industry funding,
however prior to the commercialisation of the vaccine approval was given for
the importation of the Rispen’s serotype 1 vaccine. The Rispen’s vaccine is
derived from a mildly virulent serotype 1 MDV isolate which was further
attenuated (weakened) by 20 cell culture passages. Rispen’s vaccine has
been used extensively for protection against MDV strains of very high
virulence. It has been shown to be mildly virulent for highly susceptible
lines of chickens and maintains its ability to spread by
contact. Bioproperties now has an important role in importing Rispens
vaccine.
Future control of Marek’s Disease in Australia
The introduction of the Rispen’s vaccine to the Australian chicken industry
has lessened the need for an Australian serotype 1 MD vaccine.
Nevertheless, the RMIT vaccine seed has been stored as it may be useful if
further change occurs in the evolution of MDVs. Since the RMIT vaccine
virus is derived from an Australian isolate, it may share more antigens with
recent strains. The Rispen’s vaccine was derived from a mildly virulent
serotype 1 MDV isolated in the 1970s in The Netherlands and, as such, may
not possess antigens common to recent Australian strains.
Trivalent combinations of all three serotypes were introduced in 1990. As at
2004, trivalent vaccines were available in the USA, recommended only for
high risk flocks, but were not available in Australia. Using fowlpox virus and
herpesvirus of turkeys as vectors (an organism that does not cause disease
itself but which spreads infection by conveying pathogens from one host to
another), experimental recombinant (genetically engineered to contain DNA
from different organisms) vaccines have been shown to be effective against
challenge with virulent Marek’s disease virus. As at 2004, recombinant
vaccines were not commercially available.
For an existing farm, other than providing clothing for visitors (disposable
overalls) and using hard fibre based litter materials (wood shavings), risk
can be reduced by being aware that there is a higher seasonal incidence of
MD in Summer/Autumn, which peaks in March. This being so, it is
important to vaccinate broiler flocks that will mature at the end of Autumn,
not just those grown for the Christmas market. In terms of biosecurity, it is
more economically feasible to provide disposable overalls for visitors than to
clean vehicles between farms as cleaning vehicles does not reduce the
spread of MDV.
Future research
The Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (a core partner
in the Australian Poultry CRC) is investing in a new project to develop a
DNA based test to quickly differentiate between wild-type MDV and MDV
from the Rispens vaccine, commonly used to vaccinate broiler-breeders and
layers. Armed with this test, it will be possible to ascertain if MDV on farms
is caused by spread of the vaccine amongst the progeny of broiler-breeders
or if it is a potentially dangerous wild-type. Meanwhile the Poultry CRC will
also look into the possibility of arranging a comparison between the
international reference strains of MDV with the known Australian strains to
establish, once and for all, just how virulent the Australian strains are. This
knowledge will help in the development of new vaccines against MDV. Given
that this work involves moving highly pathogenic virus between countries, it
will be carried out at either an Australian or overseas laboratory with the
highest possible levels of biosecurity.
PARASITIC WORMS
All birds are naturally subject to infection by parasitic worms,
or Helminths. The majority of Helminths infect the digestive tract but some
are also found in other organs, such as the brain, trachea and eye. Not all
Helminth infections cause obvious clinical disease. The roundworms (or
nematodes) and the flatworms (including cestodes and trematodes) are
the two major classes of Helminth.
Parasitic worms have either a direct or indirect lifecycle. Worms that have a
direct lifecycle only need to infect a single host species in order to complete
their entire lifecycle, although some development may take place outside of
the host. Worms that have an indirect lifecycle require two different hosts to
complete their lifecycle – a main host and an intermediate host. Worms with
an indirect lifecycle spend some of their immature phase in an intermediate
host but must then infect the main host in order to be able to reach
maturity and reproduce. Some worms may require very specific intermediate
and/or main host species.
Roundworms (nematodes)
Syngamus trachea (gapeworm) Source: The Merck Veterinary
Manual