Introduction to International Relations: POL 131 Professor Shahab-ud-din Ahmad Class Participation Assignment: Populism has been on the rise in the United States, France and India. Keeping this context in mind, can you observe similar trends in political rhetoric expressed by certain Pakistani political parties? Justify your comment and try to be specific. Within the last couple of years, Pakistan has witnessed instances of both implicit and explicit populism. The rise of explicit populism has been two fold. Firstly, it has been the successful creation of Pakistan Tehreek e Insaaf (PTI), led by its charismatic leader Imran Khan, who uses anti-establishment rhetoric and has been successful in popular mobilization against a self-serving system. Secondly, it is the politics that has been employed by Nawaz Sharif, the Pakistan Muslim League (N) leader, after his dismissal post-Panama Papers Scandal. This kind of populism can be directly related to the patterns of populism in the United States under Donald Trump, where Nawaz Sharif has not employed any facts, logic or legal basis and only resorted to claims that his removal was unjust. Based on this, he has also been successful in mobilizing his supporters to protest against the decision of the Judiciary. Traditionally, populism has been based around a leader and the rhetoric employed by him, such as that in India, where Modhi has employed pander based on religion to gather support and implement his policies. This is why, the rise of implicit populism in Pakistan has been different, and a new phenomenon even though it is based on religious dynamics. Radical religious parties who have successful backing of the conservative Pakistani demographic has been rising, and gaining more and more power. A few weeks ago, the Tehreek E Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah Pakistan (TLY) was successful in making the government surrender to all their demands, including that of the Oath. It would be disingenuous to completely ignore the changing political dynamics within Pakistan. This ideology has also gained political recognition, like the candidate backed by Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah, who campaigned on strict blasphemy laws and managed to secure 6% of votes in the National Assembly elections. New radical parties which can also be described as purely radical movements like Tehreek E Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah Pakistan (TLY), Lashkar-e-Taiba and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi have been actively gaining more support in areas like Jhang. This kind of populism has been based around a certain ideology, rather than a leader or charismatic authority these parties. The Tableeghi Jamat, while claiming to be apolitical, has a very strong reach. If needed, they too can stop the entire country. This is why the government has stayed cognizant of these parties and actively make efforts to not anger them. However, the rise of populism in Pakistan comes with its limits. Islamic parties that are strong in their rhetoric don’t have chances of sweeping electoral success, like that in India, since they need a wider voter base for that. There is nothing unusual or out of the ordinary that has been happening in the Pakistani context. Political party structures have been similar here like they have prevailed in the past, Pakistan People’s Party and the Pakistan Muslim League (N) have not shifted their narratives. Considering the trends in Pakistan, patronage and leadership charisma still dominate support. When compared to the vast reach of populist parties in France, India and US, there is still a long time before their rhetoric streamlines within Pakistani Politics. Word Count: 551 words.