Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is Qualitative Research
What Is Qualitative Research
Qualitative research is a process of naturalistic inquiry that seeks in-depth understanding of social
phenomena within their natural setting. It focuses on the "why" rather than the "what" of social
phenomena and relies on the direct experiences of human beings as meaning-making agents in their
every day lives. Rather than by logical and statistical procedures, qualitative researchers use multiple
systems of inquiry for the study of human phenomena including biography, case study, historical
analysis, discourse analysis, ethnography, grounded theory and phenomenology.
The three major focus areas are individuals, societies and cultures, and language and communication.
Although there are many methods of inquiry in qualitative research, the common assumptions are that
knowledge is subjective rather than objective and that the researcher learns from the participants in
order to understand the meaning of their lives. To ensure rigor and trustworthiness, the researcher
attempts to maintain a position of neutrality while engaged in the research process.
Human beings have always attempted to understand the world in which we live. Before the 19th
century, questions about human existence were answered from the Bible, the church, and from Greek
philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle who believed that the process of "knowing" was absolute,
systematic and logical.
It was during the late 18th century when "the pursuit of knowledge" experienced a scientific crisis.
Other philosophers such as Immanual Kant, William Dilthey, Edmund Husserl and Maurice Merleau-
Ponty believed that life consists of what we experience in our activities and reflections as we live out our
personal histories and that we live in a matrix of complex relationships with others. Therefore, humans
cannot be studied as isolated units but must be understood in the context of their "lived world" or
cultural and social connections. The seminal work of these philosophers paved the way for the birth of
naturalistic or qualitative inquiry.
Most simply put, quantitative research is concerned with measurement and numbers, while qualitative
research is concerned with understanding and words. Qualitative methods allow the researcher to study
selected issues in depth and detail without being constrained by pre-determined categories of analysis.
Quantitative methods require the use of standardized measures in order to fit the different perspectives
and experiences of people into a limited number of predetermined response categories to which
numbers are assigned.
While quantitative research values control, qualitative research values openness and flexibility. The
quantitative researcher maintains an objective, detached stance, but the qualitative researcher is
considered to be the key instrument involved closely with the data collection and analysis. The statistical
data of quantitative methods obtained from a great many people results in a broad, generalizable set of
findings that are succinct and said to be parsimonious. In contrast qualitative methods produce a large
amount of detailed information about a smaller number of people that results in rich understanding but
reduces generalizability.
Qualitative and quantitative methods involve differing strengths and weaknesses and, therefore, should
be seen as alternative but not mutually exclusive strategies for research.
While many qualitative researchers do not believe that the standards used to judge quantitative
methods are appropriate for evaluating qualitative research methods, they do believe that the systemic
protocol of "good science" should be retained. In qualitative research the conventional standards of
reliability and internal and external validity do not apply. However, there are distinct but related aspects
of inquiry on which credibility depends and any credible qualitative study needs to address all of the
following in order to ensure credibility and rigor of findings:
What is most important for the qualitative researcher is to be familiar with the different qualitative
research approaches. Then, researchers can make informed choices about what they will use for their
studies and why they will use them. When the comparisons and distinctions among the approaches are
clear, the researcher can then design a more rigorous study.
References
Abram D. The Spell of the Sensuous. New York: Vintage Books; 1997
Alkin MC, Daillak R, White P. Using Evaluation: Does Evaluation Make a Difference? Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage;1979.
Cresswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage; 1998.
Eisner EW. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Education. Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall; 1998
Ferrer JN. Re-visioning Transpersonal Psychology: A Participatory Vision of Human Spirituality. Albany,
NY: SUNY Press; 2002.
Giorgi A. Psychology as a Human Science: A Phenomenologically Based Approach. New York: Harper &
Row; 1970.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: A sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage; 1984.
Morrow SL, Smith ML. Qualitative research for counseling psychology. In Brown SD, Lent RW, eds. In:
Handbook of Counseling Psychology. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000:199–230.
Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
Polkinghorne D. Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry. Albany, NY: State University
of New York Press; 1983.
Solomon RC, Higgins KM. A Passion for Wisdom: A Very Brief History of Philosophy. New York: Oxford
University Press; 1997.
Tarnas R. The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas That Have Shaped Our World
View. New York: Ballantine Books; 1991.
Tart CT, ed. Transpersonal Psychologies. New York: Harper & Row; 1975.