Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACHELOR’S THESIS
JOHAN WIKSTÉN
MARCUS JOHANSSON
B. Sc. PROGRAMME
Aeronautical Engineering
Arbetet har utförts på Avdelningen för Operation and Maintenance Enginering vid
LTU, under en tio veckors period vårterminen 2006. Uppdragsgivare var Luleå
Flygteknik, som tillhandahöll material och expertis inom flygunderhåll och dess
procedurer. Författarna vill här ta tillfället i akt att tacka alla som på ett eller annat sätt
bidragit till, eller medverkat, i arbetet. Ett speciellt tack tillskrivs följande personer för
deras medverkan och för delgivandet av expertis och kunskaper under arbetets gång,
dessa personer är: Prof. Uday Kumar (examinator LTU), Aditya Parida (handledare
LTU), Arne Nissen (Adjunkt LTU) och Jan Viklund (uppdragsgivare och handledare
LFT).
The study has been performed at the Division of Operation and Maintenance
Engineering at Luleå University of Technology (LTU) during ten weeks in the spring
semester of 2006. Sponsor for the study was Luleå FlygTeknik (LFT) which provided
material and expertise in aviation maintenance and its procedures.
The authors wish to thank every person who has, in one way or another, been
contributing or involved in this study. A especially thank you, are directed to the
following persons for their participation and for sharing their expertise during the
study, they are: Prof. Uday Kumar (examiner LTU), Aditya Parida (supervisor LTU)
and Jan Viklund (sponsor and supervisor LFT).
INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT 2
1.3 PURPOSE 2
1.4 AIM 2
1.6 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS 2
1.7 METHODOLOGY 2
CHAPTER 2 4
2.1 RELIABILITY 4
2.1.1 PROBABILITY THEORY 4
2.1.2 PROBABILITY/RELIABILITY DISTRIBUTION 5
2.1.3 RELIABILITY MEASUREMENTS 6
2.1.4 FAILURE FUNCTION 6
2.1.5 RELIABILITY FUNCTION 7
2.2 MAINTENANCE 8
2.2.1 MAINTAINABILITY AND ITS CONCEPTS 9
2.2.2 MAINTAINABILITY MEASUREMENTS 9
2.2.3 MAINTENANCE AND ITS CONCEPTS 10
2.2.4 MAINTENANCE COST 12
2.3 OPTIMIZATION OF MAINTENANCE 13
2.3.1 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY 13
2.3.2 MSG3, RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE 15
2.3.3 RCM PROCESS 16
2.4 LOGISTICS 19
2.4.1 HISTORY 19
2.5 INTEGRATED LOGISTIC SUPPORT 19
2.5.1 MAINTENANCE PLANNING 20
2.5.2 SUPPLY SUPPORT 20
2.5.3 SUPPORT AND TEST EQUIPMENT 21
2.5.4 MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL 21
2.5.5 TRAINING AND TRAINING DEVICES 22
2.5.6 TECHNICAL DATA 22
2.5.7 COMPUTER RESOURCES SUPPORT 23
2.5.8 HANDLING, STORAGE, AND TRANSPORTATION 23
2.5.9 FACILITIES 24
2.5.10 DESIGN INTERFACE 24
2.6 AVIATION LOGISTICS 24
2.7 INTERVIEWS 25
CHAPTER 3 27
AUTHORITY REGULATIONS 27
CHAPTER 4 31
CHAPTER 5 38
DISCUSSION 38
CHAPTER 6 42
RECOMMENDATIONS 42
CHAPTER 7 43
CONCLUSION 43
CHAPTER 8 44
REFERENCES 44
8.1 LITERATURE 44
8.2 WEB 45
APPENDIX 46
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Maintaining a repairable system can be a complex task from economical and
reliability point of view. High reliability is most essential which may not be connected
with high costs. Due to the multidisciplinary characteristic of maintenance which
consists of management planning, equipment, facilities, inventory and human
resources, it is hard to overview and manage the maintenance tasks. If a system is not
maintained correctly, it will sooner or later cease to perform its required function with
loss of safety and availability, besides reliability which will lead to several losses like
economical, structural and in the worst case fatal injuries to humans.
Within the aviation industry, the operational requirements are high and because of the
consequences of failure, the maintenance procedures governed by strict legislation
under strict directive from regulating authority. These directives are developed in a
structured way of national requirements like international safety standards. The
scheduled maintenance of an aircraft contains hundreds of timely/cyclic based
inspections and replacements of parts. These can be divided into about 40, or more,
groups with different periodic intervals, which are developed from maintenance
strategy like MSG3. Even if a system is maintained, deviations will occur, these
deviations must be considered separately since they have a tendency to occur
randomly at times and these are the unscheduled maintenance tasks. All implemented
maintenance tasks, scheduled as well as unscheduled, must be recorded and archived.
For small and medium companies, it seems like this information is rarely used to
improve the organization. Even if there are already developed software’s available on
the market, which takes care of probability calculations of failures and spare part
optimization, the burden of license fees is too high for the small and medium
maintenance organizations to justify the use of these. Savings can be made by using
the knowledge of previous maintenance data, although the use of an adopted software
would be more effective, a simpler and cheaper analytic method can improve the
logistic tasks like maintenance planning, spares, etc, and will also affect positively on
aircraft availability and unpredicted expenses.
1
1.2 Problem statement
The cost of maintenance in the aviation industry is high and there is always a
continuous process of cutting costs, which has to be done without interfering with
safety and airworthiness. Due to the demands from the authorities, there is a source of
information in the maintenance records. Our task is to compile these information’s
and investigate for analyzing it and further, to give suggestions of how to implement
these statistical results in the maintenance and logistic planning.
1.3 Purpose
The main purpose of this work is to develop a methodology that will, facilitate
improvement of the logistic function of spare part handling, analyze the existing
source of information that has been collected in compliance with regulating
authorities. Additionally, this study may affect areas such as aircraft maintenance
planning, availability and reliability. Altogether, they will have a long term effect on
the safety and economy, we will also enhance our knowledge in the topic of
maintenance reliability.
1.4 Aim
The aim of this study is to improve maintenance decision making, using the existing
maintenance data.
1.7 Methodology
To reach the aim previously stated, we will do the literature study on maintenance
reliability and logistic support theory, besides, analyze the authority regulation by
studying PART-M, PART-145 and a MRB/MPD-AMP system from the aviation
industry including the ATA-100 system. We will also make interviews with, for this
topic, relevant people. We will identify the demanded maintenance tasks performed
during one year, divided into four quarters, for three sample aircrafts which are
recognized in different lifetime periods with few, mid and many running hours to give
some idea of the different characteristics of failure due to age. The process of this
study is illustrated in Figure 1.1.
2
Identification of
problem and
purpose
Literature studies
MRB/MPD
AMP-system
studies
Identifying
maintenance
tasks and data
Report
writing
Compiling
maintenance
tasks
Discussion
Recommendation
Conclusion
3
Chapter 2
LITERATURE STUDIES AND INTERVIEWS
2.1 Reliability
Ever since the very beginning of the industrial era, customers have demanded more,
better and faster deliveries of products and services, all these at lower costs. In other
words, they want to get value for their money spent. This problem is due to the fact
that one produces, what someone else consumes, the consumer has to rely on the
producer, that the product will deliver value as expected and the producer must as far
as possible try to fulfill the consumers needs and demands, this is important due to the
competitive market.
“Operators want infinite performance, at zero life-cycle costs, with 100% availability
from the day they take delivery to the day they dispose it.”
(Kumar et al., 2000)
This is of course the ideal request, but of course impossible to achieve. The operators
demand is to get as close as possible to this extreme, or at least closer than their
competitors. One step to reach a high level of availability is to increase the reliability
of the products, although this on its own, one can’t fulfill all those demands, but it is a
link in the chain consisting of reliability, maintenance and logistic support, where
maintenance comes as a natural part of reliability.
4
2.1.2 Probability/Reliability distribution
There are some theoretical probability distributions that imply to reliability study and
analysis. However, we will only explain functions which are applicable for the
continuous time variable.
Exponential distribution is well defined by a single parameter that controls the scale
of the distribution. The exponential distribution is positively skewed, with the smallest
possible value, zero. A unique property of the exponential distribution is that it is the
only continuous distribution that has memory less property, that mean the conditional
probability depends only on remaining duration and is independent of the current age
of the item. This property is exploited to a great extend in reliability theory.
The general formula for the probability density function of the exponential
distribution is
f (t ) = λe − λt 0<t<∞
The general formula for the reliability function of the exponential distribution is
R(t ) = e − λt
1
where λ =
MTBF
(Leitch, 1995)
μ x ⋅ e −μ
Px (t ) = μ is defined as the expected value λt
x!
(NIST/SEMATECH, web)
5
2.1.3 Reliability measurements
Broadly the reliability metrics are classified as: 1. Basic Reliability Measures, 2.
Mission Reliability Measures, 3. Operational Reliability Measures and 4. Contractual
Reliability Measures. Basic Reliability Measures are used to predict system’s ability
to operate without maintenance and logistic support. Reliability measures like
reliability function and failure function fall under this category. Mission Reliability
Measures are used to predict systems ability to complete mission. Reliability
measures such as mission reliability, Maintenance Free Operating Period (MFOP),
Failure Free Operating Period (FFOP), and hazard function fall under this category.
Operational Reliability Measures are used to predict the performance of the system
when operated in a planned environment including the combined effect of design,
quality, environment, maintenance, support policy, etc. Measures such as Mean Time
Between Maintenance (MTBM), Mean Time Between Overhaul (MTBO),
Maintenance Free Operating Period (MFOP), Mean Time Between Critical Failure
(MTBCF) and Mean Time Between Unscheduled Removal (MTBUR) fall under this
category. Contractual Reliability Measure is used to define measure and evaluate the
manufacturers program. Contractual reliability is calculated by considering design and
manufacturing characteristics. Basically it is the inherent reliability characteristic.
Measures such as Mean Time To Failure (MTTF), Mean Time Between Failure
(MTBF) and Failure rate fall under this category. (Kumar et al., 2000)
6
Applications of the failure function:
F(t) is the probability that an item will fail by time t, F(t) is the fraction of items that
will fail by time t and 1-F(t) is the probability that an item will survive up to time t.
Failure Function
7
2.2 Maintenance
Maintenance and maintainability has always been important to the industry as it
affects the performance as well as the finance. For commercial airlines, maintenance
costs are approximately 10% of the airlines total costs. Operators would like their
systems to be functional and available for safe operation when ever required. To
achieve this there are in fact several ways to go, one of them is to construct systems
that are extremely reliable which consequently will result in higher acquisition cost,
another way is to design systems that are easy and quick to repair when they fail, or
some combination of these two described methods would do. Maintenance is a
necessary action to sustain and restore the performance, reliability and safety of the
item.
The main objective of maintenance is to ensure the availability of the system. For
aircraft, maintenance is an essential part of airworthiness. Further more, critical
failures are under no circumstances allowed to occur during flight. Terminologically,
maintenance is divided in corrective and predictive maintenance in accordance to
ISO/SS 13306 standard, predictive maintenance is further divided into preventive
maintenance (time-based) and conditional maintenance (condition-based). SeeFigure
2.3
Corrective Predictive
Maintenance Maintenance
Condition Predetermined
Based (Time based)
8
2.2.1 Maintainability and its concepts
Even if the ideal situation would be that an item could maintain its performance
and/or function for ever, this can in reality never be achieved. Therefore, it must be
maintained, thus for the user it is important to know; when and how often
maintenance tasks should be performed, how they should be performed, how many
people will be needed and what skills and how much training they will need, how
much restoration will cost, how long the system will be down, and what facilities and
equipment will be required.
In the aviation industry, several of these questions are strictly regulated by the
authorities. It is a common misperception that maintainability is simply the ability to
reach a component for required maintenance tasks, which is called accessibility. There
are other factors like, visibility, testability, simplicity and interchangeability which
must be considered. Additionally, one must consider the environment in which it
operates.
9
2.2.3 Maintenance and its concepts
Maintenance can be explained as all actions taken to keep a system running and to
ensure that it is keeping an acceptable standard in which it is able to operate at the
required levels of efficiency and effectiveness. The objectives of maintenance are to:
10
Corrective maintenance task is a set of activities which is performed with the
intension of restoring the functionality or performance i.e. after failure. The duration
of corrective maintenance task, DMTc, represents the elapsed time needed for
successful completion of the task. See Figure 2.4. Corrective maintenance task is also
referred to as an unscheduled or unplanned maintenance task.
CMT
start
CMT
complet Item failed Fault location Disassembly
MTBF Repair
Verification
?DMT c or
Replacement
Figure 2.4 Corrective maintenance task activities (adapted, source, Kumar et al., 2000)
PMT PMT
complete start
Disassembly
Tp
Verification MTBF
Replacement
p
DMT
Preventive maintenance
task activities
Test and Check Assembly
Figure 2.5 Preventive maintenance task activities (adapted, source, Kumar et al., 2000)
11
Conditional maintenance task recognizes that a change in condition and/or
performance is likely to precede a failure so the maintenance task should be based on
the actual condition of the item. Preventive action is taken when it is believed that an
incipient failure has been detected. Thus through monitoring of some condition
parameters it would be possible to identify the most suitable instant of time at which
preventive maintenance tasks should take place. The duration of conditional
maintenance task, DMTm, represents the elapsed time needed for the successful
completion of the task. See Figure 2.6
COT COT
complete start
Inspection/
I Examination
FMT /FMTE
Decision
making Data
collection
DMTm
Conditional maintenance
task activities
Condition Condition
interpretation assessment
Figure 2.6 Conditional maintenance task activities (adapted, source, Kumar et al., 2000)
12
2.3 Optimization of maintenance
The objective of maintenance optimization models is to determine the optimum
maintenance tasks that minimize the downtime while providing the most effective use
of systems in order to secure the desired results at the lowest possible costs, taking all
possible constraints into account. The models can be either quantitative or procedure
based such as reliability centered maintenance, age related or total productive
maintenance (Kumar et al., 2000) The most frequent criteria for developing
maintenance models are:
The need of adequate maintenance planning is the most common cause of developing
mathematical models and their algorithms. These should provide optimal solutions to
the following question: when should an item be repaired, replaced, inspected or
examined? The mathematical model provides answer to the above question, based on
information available and chosen criteria. Modeling of the relation between the
operating cost per unit time or the system availability and the preventive maintenance
interval is a traditional method in use. An additional measure which also has to be
considered are Mean Down Time (MDT), which represents the total time the aircraft
is out of operation due to maintenance.
Hazard rate
Operating time
R
Figure 2.7 Decreasing hazard rate
13
An items time to failure, is exponential distributed, if it has a constant hazardous rate.
That mean, the probability of failure during the next time increment remains
unchanged throughout the lifetime of the item, indicating that it is as good as new, no
matter how long it has operated. Preventive maintenance is irrelevant in this case
though a replacement will make no difference to the failure probability.
Hazard rate
Operating time
R
Figure 2.8 Constant hazard rate
Hazard rate
Operating time
R
Figure 2.9 Increasing hazard rate
14
2.3.2 MSG3, Reliability Centered Maintenance
Reliability Centered Maintenance, (RCM), has its roots in the aviation industry in the
late 1960s in conjunction with the introduction of the Boeing 747. The maintenance
requirements from the Federal Aviation Administration resulted in a maintenance plan
on which maintenance tasks were so extensive that the airlines probably would not
have been able to operate the 747 with profit. As a result, the Federal Aviation
Authority formed a Maintenance Steering Group, (MSG), consisting operator,
manufacturer and regulator. They researched the maintenance area of particular
importance to various systems, so that a logical and generally applicable approach
could be used for developing maintenance strategies that could ensure maximum
safety and reliability with minimization of cost. Further on, this resulted in MSG-2
and finally in the 1980s in MSG-3.
The RCM study has established that there where six failure related patterns, the most
common failure pattern show a failure rate decreasing with age before going into a
period of random failure pattern, and most uncommon pattern show a failure rate
which is constant with age before going into a period of increasing failure rate. See all
six kinds of patterns established in Figure 2.10.
1) Bathtub curve; decreasing, constant and 2) Low failure rate then item is new,
gradually increasing failure rate quick increase to constant rate
Figure 2.10 Different pattern of failure rate (source, Kumar et al., 2000)
15
2.3.3 RCM Process
The process is used to identify system functions, the way these functions fail and the
consequences of the failures and apply this information to develop an appropriate
maintenance tasks to prevent system failures. Primarily, one can say that the objective
of RCM is to preserve systems functions taking into account objectives as minimizing
costs, safety and environmental goals, and finally meeting operational goals.
Additionally objectives of RCM can be described as follows:
Functional
System Design System Selection Breakdown
FBD
Redesign
Failure Mode,
RCM Decision Effect and
Maintenance Analysis Analysis
No preventive
maintenance task
evaluation
Failure Failure Mode,
Consequences Characteristics
Preventive
maintenance
Failure and
Maintenance Implementation of Maintenance
Schedules Maintenance task Records
Figure 2.11 The RCM closed process (adapted from Kumar et al., 2000)
The RCM process begins with failure mode, effect and analysis, (FMEA), which
identifies the systems failure modes in a systematic and structured manner. Every one
of these failure modes is then examined to determine the optimal maintenance task to
reduce or avoid the severity of each failure. In this process, most of the following
issues have been taken into account, namely cost, safety, and environmental and
operational consequences.
16
The RCM methodology varies within different industrial areas, but the basic steps are
however quite common to all applications, including MSG-3. The RCM compromises
the following steps:
1. System selection.
2. Perform Failure Modes and Effect Analysis.
3. RCM decision logic process. Identification of failure consequences.
4. Selection of maintenance tasks.
System selection are the first step where the areas which is assumed to benefit most
from the analysis are specified, even though all areas would probably draw some
benefit from RCM analysis. It is also necessary to identify the level of assembly at
which the analysis should be conducted. Questions like; will an improvement in
preventive maintenance reduce cost and improve reliability and safety? Does the
current maintenance strategy include a large portion of time based maintenance that
could be replaced with condition based? Is there a known design problem that is
causing failures and results in high maintenance costs? These are common questions
which occur during this phase of the process.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis is a systematic approach to identify all possible
ways in which failure of a system can occur together with its causes and thus the
failures potential effect on the system. It is performed to find out how each item in a
system is likely to fail and what happens if it does. The FMEA does additionally often
include an evaluation of the failure criticality- and assessment of the severity of the
failure effect and its probability of occurrence. This is in fact two steps which is called
failure mode effect critically analysis (FMECA) when combined.
RCM Decision Logic Process analyses the consequences of each failure mode and
identifies an applicable and maintenance task by using the principle that a
maintenance task is worth doing if its deals successfully with the consequences of the
failure mode which it is meant to prevent. For each failure mode, there are some
questions to be asked:
The answers are in the simple “yes” and “no” format which make them easy to record
on a RCM decision worksheet. The consequences of each failure are identified based
on decision logic as illustrated in Figure 2.12.
17
Figure 2.12 Identification of consequences of failures (source, Kumar et al., 2000)
18
2.4 Logistics
Logistics are defined as the process of planning, implementing and controlling the
efficient and cost-effective flow and storage of materials, process inventory, finished
parts and all related information from the point of origin to the point of consumption,
for the purpose of conforming to customers’ requirements (Logistics World, web).
One may say that, it is the science of ensuring that the right products reach the right
place, in the right quantity, at the right time, to satisfy the customers’ demands.
2.4.1 History
The origin of logistics can be found in the Second World War. It was important to
achieve an effective support line to getting the necessary supplies and right equipment
on to the front, this to enhance the fighting moral, as well as the possibilities to hold
on to the captured land. These experiences were adopted by the civil market soon after
the war.
The logistics theory evolved during the early 50s, and with the beginning of the
computer age, it was implemented in the trade market, which contains of
manufacturing and sales management. During this period, a new logistic process
emerged. The new process involved all phases through a products life time, from its
early development on to its disposal. This evolved to what we today know as
Integrated Logistic Support.
1. Maintenance planning
2. Supply support
3. Support and Test Equipment and Equipment support
4. Manpower and personnel
5. Training and training support
6. Technical data
7. Computer Resources support
8. Facilities
9. Handling, Storage, and Transportation
10. Design interface
These elements must be developed within the system engineering effort, and in
coordination with each other. (Logistics World, web) Some compromises may be
required between the elements in order to acquire a system that is affordable,
operable, supportable, sustainable, transportable, and environmentally sound within
the available resources. The planning for a system is normally contained in an
Integrated Logistics Support Plan. The planning activities coincide with development
of the system acquisition strategy, and the program will be tailored accordingly. The
above mentioned elements are explained in detail, in numerical order (Wikipedia,
2001, web).
19
2.5.1 Maintenance Planning
Maintenance planning begins early in the acquisition process with development of the
maintenance concept. It is conducted to evolve and establish requirements and tasks to
be accomplished for achieving, restoring, and maintaining the operational capability
for the life of the system. Maintenance planning relies on something called, Level Of
Repair Analysis, which is a function within the system acquisition process. The
maintenance planning contains of:
1. Define the actions and support that is necessary to ensure that the system
attains the specified system readiness objectives within minimum Life Cycle
Cost.
2. Setting up specific criteria for repair, requirements, testability, reliability, and
maintainability, support equipment requirements and manpower skills and
facility requirements.
3. State specific maintenance tasks, to be performed on the system.
4. Define actions and support required for fielding and marketing the system.
5. Address warranty considerations.
6. The maintenance concept must ensure prudent use of manpower and
resources. When formulating the maintenance concept, analysis of the
proposed work environment on the health and safety of maintenance
personnel must be considered.
7. Conduct a Level Of Repair Analysis, to optimize the support system, in terms
of Life Cycle Costs, readiness objectives, design for disposal, maintenance
task distribution, support equipment, and manpower and personnel
requirements.
8. Minimize the use of hazardous materials and the generation of waste.
20
2.5.3 Support and Test Equipment
Support and test equipment includes all required equipments, mobile and fixed, that is
needed to perform all support functions, except that equipment which is an integral
part of the system. This category also encompasses planning and acquisition of
logistic support for the required equipments. It contains of:
21
2.5.5 Training and Training Devices
Training and training devices support encompasses the processes, procedures,
techniques, training devices, and equipment used to train personnel to operate and
support a system. This element defines qualitative and quantitative requirements for
the training of operating and support personnel throughout the life cycle of the
system. It includes requirements for:
1. Factory training.
2. Instructor and key personnel training.
3. New equipment training team.
4. Resident training.
5. Sustain trainings.
6. User training.
7. Disposal and safe procedures training.
Embedded training devices, features, and components are designed and built into a
specific system to provide training or assistance in the use of the system. The design,
development, delivery, installation, and logistic support of required embedded
training features, mockups, simulators, and training aids are also included.
1. Technical manuals.
2. Technical and supply bulletins.
3. Transportability guidance technical manuals.
4. Maintenance expenditure limits and calibration procedures.
5. Repair parts and tools lists.
6. Maintenance allocation charts.
7. Preventive maintenance instructions.
8. Drawings/specifications/technical data packages.
9. Software documentation.
10. Provisioning documentation.
11. Depot maintenance work requirements.
12. Identification lists.
13. Component lists.
14. Product support data.
15. Flight safety critical parts list for aircraft.
16. Lifting and tie down pamphlet/references.
17. Hazardous Material documentation.
22
2.5.7 Computer Resources Support
Computer Resources Support includes the facilities, hardware, software,
documentation, manpower, and personnel needed to operate and support computer
systems and the software within those systems. Computer resources include both
stand-alone and embedded systems. This element is usually planned, developed,
implemented, and monitored by a Computer Resources Working Group, or Computer
Resources Integrated Product Team, that documents the approach and tracks progress
via a Computer Resources Life-Cycle Management Plan. Developers will need to
ensure that planning actions and strategies contained in the Integrated Logistics
Support Plan are complementary and that computer resources support for the
operational software, and Automatic Test Equipment software, support software is
available where and when it is needed.
These factors are measured by Mean Logistic Delay Time (MLDT), which also
includes waiting time for personnel and parts.
23
2.5.9 Facilities
The Facilities logistics element is composed of a variety of planning activities, all of
which are directed toward ensuring that all required permanent or semi permanent
operating and support facilities are available concurrently with system fielding.
Planning must be comprehensive and include the need for new construction as well as
modifications to existing facilities. Facility construction can take from 5 to 7 years
from concept formulation to user occupancy. It also includes studies to define and
establish impacts on life cycle cost, funding requirements, facility locations and
improvements, space requirements, environmental impacts, duration or frequency of
use, safety and health standards requirements, and security restrictions. Also included
are any utility requirements, for both fixed and mobile facilities, with accent on
limiting requirements of insufficient or unique resources.
1. Reliability requirements.
2. Maintainability requirements.
3. Standardization requirements.
4. Interoperability requirements.
5. Safety requirements.
6. Security requirements.
7. Usability requirements.
8. Environmental requirements.
9. Privacy requirements, particularly for computer systems.
10. Legal requirements.
24
2.7 Interviews
During our work, several cost and time-period related questions arose. We needed
answers to these questions, otherwise we should not been able to calculate the time
span, as well as costs related to unscheduled maintenance tasks. By time span, we
mean the different time periods that an aircraft is standing on the ground because of
unexpected failures, i.e. MDT, MTTF and MTTR. The costs are dedicated to the costs
of labour, aircraft standing time (i.e. staff, passenger, etc) and spare parts, until the
failure is rectified. Our questions were asked to, and answered by our sponsor Jan
Viklund at LFT. Some questions were ATA-group related, and were thereby repeated
through the most failure frequent ATA- groups. In our case, the ATA-25, 32, 72, 76
and 79 groups. By getting number and figures related to each question, we were able
to calculate a mean value for every cost and time aspect for the regarding ATA-group.
This means that our figures are all fictive and in some manner even exaggerated.
What were the questions and what answers did we get? They are all listed in Table 2.1
below.
Questions Answers
What is the cost when an An unexpected interruption in operation of a 160 pass aircraft costs approx.
Aircraft is standing on the 100.000Sek / day (≈10.000$ / day).
ground unintentionally?
What is the MTTR figure for ATA-25 ≈1-3h, ATA-32 ≈1-8h, ATA-72 ≈16h
ATA-group 25,32,72,76 and ATA-76 ≈4-5days+ 8h ctr flight, ATA-79 ≈1-5h
79?
What is the MDT figure for Add 20% to the MTTR-figure and you will have the approximate MDT-
the regarding ATA-groups? figure.
What is the cost for spare ATA-25≈500-30000$, ATA-32≈60-80$/h(leasing account, brakes most
parts regarding to the ATA- freq. 1500$ ea), ATA-72 ≈(leasing account)
groups? ATA-76 ≈ 150.000$, ATA-79 ≈100-500$
What is the cost of keeping This is a complex question. In the organizations closure you will regard the
spare parts in stock, like stock as an asset, not an expense. You might have a cost initially when parts
personnel and facilities? are purchased but it will be converted in to an asset in the closure. Usually
consumables are kept in stock, like filters, tires, relays, gaskets and bulbs.
How long does it take to get From the US you will get the part within 12hours.
the parts, ASAP? From the EU you will get the part within 3hours.
Where is the bottleneck in It is often the Toll that creates most of the delays and waiting time. The
the logistic system? figures in the previous question is depending on if the consignment is stuck
in a Toll random sample check or not.
What is the maintenance cost The labor and facility cost can be said to be 65$ per hour plus social fees of
to repair or replace parts, 32%, plus profit margin of 20%. This counts to approximately 103$ per
approximately? hour.
What is the cost to repair or For this question we had prepared a list of maintenance tasks which can be
replace parts, seen in Appendix I
approximately?
Table 2.1 Questions and answers from interview
25
Out of these questions and answers, we were able to create a cost calculation model to
show if savings could bee made out of preventive actions. See chapter 4.5.2 Analyses
of preventive maintenance. Further more, some short, on the spot, interviews with
people of certain knowledge have been done as the questions have emerged. These
questions, mostly reliability and probability related, have been directed to some
people at the Division of maintenance engineering, at LTU. The answers to these
questions were important to create progress of our knowledge in, and the development
of, the theoretical part of our work. Another important event in the work have been
the partly presentations with the examiner, supervisor and sponsor. During these
meetings, we have discussed the work, its progress, and if we have been able to keep
on the track. Answers to any resulting questions have also been given during these
meetings.
26
Chapter 3
AUTHORITY REGULATIONS
3.1 Certifying authority
Each country has a certifying authority, which supervise each and every happening in
the respective aviation industry and its organizations. A standardized system of
regulation is often used as a base for the creations of the national law and regulations.
Swedish authority was earlier complied with Joint Aviation Regulation (JAR), but
now since joining the European Union, regulations are complied with the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) standard.
Since, there are political and cultural differences within the union, the EASA standard
is thought to be a common foundation, on to which the union members can rely on
their regulations. This will make the procedures in the aviation industry alike, no
matter in which country you might be in. To highlight the main thought by the EASA
standard, the following text is brought from the EASA agency structure (EASA, 2005,
web):
In order to ensure that decisions on safety issues are free from all political
interference. Decisions must be in the hands of a neutral and independent decision
maker invested with the necessary powers. This is why the safety decisions of the
agency will be taken by its executive director, as is already the case in most countries
which have developed systems for aviation safety regulation.
Executive
Director
Organization Design
Production
Continuing
Airworthiness
Figure 3.1 EASA organizational chart (modified organizational chart, source EASA, 2005)
27
Since these decisions directly affect people and organizations, the Regulation creates
an independent “Board of Appeal”, whose role is to check that the Executive Director
has correctly applied European legislation in this field.
The Executive Director is appointed by the Agency’s Management Board. The Board,
which brings together representatives of the Member States and the Commission, is
responsible for the definition of the Agency’s priorities, the establishment of the
budget and for monitoring the Agency’s operation.
The Advisory Body of Interested Parties assists the Management Board in its work. It
comprises organizations representing aviation personnel, manufacturers, commercial
and general aviation operators, maintenance industry, training organizations and air
sports.
This study will be performed according to the regulations in EASA Part-145 and Part-
M, advised through the department of Certification-Organization-Continuing
Airworthiness. See figure 3.1 above
Certification
The Agency’s Certification work also includes all post-certification activities, such as
the approval of changes to, and repairs of, aeronautical products and their
components, as well as the issuing of airworthiness directives to correct any
potentially unsafe situation. All type-certificates are therefore now issued by the
European Aviation Safety Agency and are valid throughout the European Union.
On the same date the Agency became the competent authority to approve and oversee
the organizations involved in the design of aeronautical products, parts and
appliances. It also carries out the same role for foreign organizations involved in the
manufacture or maintenance of such products.
To execute its tasks within the present period of building up its resources, the Agency
relies on national aviation authorities who have historically filled this role and
concludes contractual arrangements to this effect.
28
Airworthiness
The Agency is responsible for the design of products, parts and appliances designed,
manufactured or used by persons under the regulatory oversight of European Union
Member States. In that context it shall issue airworthiness directives to ensure the
continuing airworthiness of such products, parts and appliances. When doing so, the
Agency only exercises the responsibilities of a State of Design or those related to the
design of such products, parts and appliances of a State of Registry. Airworthiness
directives are therefore addressed to the holders of the design approvals affected by
such airworthiness directives. The dissemination of airworthiness directives to
aircraft owners is a responsibility of the State of Registry and does not belong to the
Agency.
For products, parts and appliances, for which the Agency only exercises the design
responsibilities of the State of registry, its policy is to endorse automatically the
airworthiness directives issued by the State of design, except if it itself issues a
different airworthiness directive before the date of effectivity of the State of design
airworthiness directive. Only those airworthiness directives issued by the Agency
itself are published.
The complete directives of EASA Part-M and Part-145 regulations can be read at the
EASA website see references.
29
3.3 Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP)
The AMP is based on several publications and documents, such as, aircraft- and
engine manufacturer maintenance manual, airplane flight manual, parts catalogs,
service bulletins, airworthiness directives and other state authority regulations. A list
of the latest revision must be kept by the operators´ technical department. The
operator is responsible for the technical documents. The maintenance program
inspection intervals can be expressed either in flight time as well as in calendar time
and/or cycles. The AMP is often structured in different chapters and related sub-
chapters. First there is a section which consists of different lists and contents and
further, there is a General section containing contents of, Applicability, Cross-
references, Permitted variations and Airworthiness directives, etc. This is followed by
the Maintenance procedures section, which in detail describes what to do, whether it
is a special/periodic inspection or an overhaul. These detailed inspections are
themselves divided into ATA-100 sub-group numbers. The Daily inspection
procedures are also located in this section.
30
Chapter 4
MAINTENANCE TASK COMPILING
4.1 Maintenance task compiling
Maintenance tasks is described as, what to maintain and how, at a certain time. Each
task is connected to a special part on the aircraft. Several tasks can be, and are,
performed at the same time. Maintenance tasks can also consist of inspections, to
determine a parts condition, and if necessary replacement. Scheduled maintenance of
an aircraft is important to withstand the high requests of safety from authorities, and
of course the passengers, after all, they are the customers. For the operator it is
important to get high availability to the aircraft, because, they are running a business
and want it to generate money, preferred profit. Aircrafts are very expensive, and the
operator needs to do down payments according to their instalment plan. This is
easiest done by shuttle people from destination A to B, and not by standing broken
down on the ground. To gain maximum availability and safety, a maintenance plan,
AMP, is developed by the operator with directions from aircraft manufacturer,
MRB/MPD, and with approval from aviation authorities to gain airworthiness. This
plan describes what to do, when to do and how to do the maintenance tasks. The
logistics planning is likewise playing an important roll in an aircraft’s availability.
This by getting the right parts at the right time and at the right quantity, or by keeping
high failure frequent parts in stock. Also tool and facility requirements and human
recourses are a key factor to this subject. Some operators possess facilities and
personnel, or are buying maintenance services from maintenance organizations, at
several airports, which mean that they are able to make their maintenance at different
locations, depending on their, at the time, needed requirements. This will dramatically
improve their aircrafts availability.
By spreading the maintenance tasks through time, the chance to detect any oncoming
failure is vastly improved, because, by dismantling one part from the aircraft for
maintenance or replacement, you might be able to spot any deflections you had not
been able to do otherwise. For example fatigue cracks in mountings, shields, pipes
and airframe that would have been covered by the part or hidden behind. Even just by
glance into the parts mounting compartment may reveal if something is out of order.
This it self will contribute to increase on safety.
To be able to show the spread in time of the maintenance tasks, we will use a sample
aircraft fleet, and show all scheduled tasks during a timeframe of one year. We will
add a randomised result of unscheduled tasks as well. The tasks are then compiled and
analysed. For a visual effect, the compilation is also drawn in graphical diagrams. See
Figure 4.1 or Appendix II.
31
4.2 Sample aircraft fleet
Since the remarks/defects data from aviation operators commonly is confidential, it is
hard to receive data for this study, this is due to its security and the competitive
market with few actors. Although, some data has been provided, covering different
aircraft types and sizes, and to protect the sources of these, we choose to use three
unspecified sample aircrafts which represents the mean average of these data. These
three aircrafts does also represent 10% of a minor to medium average fleet. The
aircrafts are:
• Aircraft s/n 5 with initially 33350 runtime hours i.e. an aircraft near the end of
its life time cycle.
• Aircraft s/n 17 with initially 18620 runtime hours i.e. an aircraft in the middle
of its life time cycle.
• Aircraft s/n 29 with initially 2130 runtime hours i.e. an aircraft in the
beginning of its life time cycle.
To be reasonable we assume that an aircraft in this average fleet flies 5 hours a day 6
days a week i.e. 1560 hours a year. Further on we assume that 1 flying hour equals 1
cycle which is a reasonable assumption for domestic flights. 1 cycle equals one take
off and landing i.e. one flight, notice, this is only valid for short distance flights.
32
The result of this study gives the following probability:
ATA Description Probability to fail/flight hour (%)
25 Equipment/Furnishings 1,67
32 Landing gear 0,83
72 Engine 0,3
76 Engine controls 0,27
79 Oil 0,56
Table 4.1 The probability to fail for each ATA group
When the probability of failure per flight hour is determined for each ATA group, we
can determine the defects spread over the year, by randomize a number between 1-
100 for each run time hour during one year i.e. 1560 times per aircraft and ATA
group. Every time the randomized number is equal to, or less, than the probability
factor it will give us a defect, and also which runtime hour the defect occurs. The
planned and unplanned tasks were compiled into diagrams were the y-axis represents
the amount of tasks, and the x-axis represents days, one diagram for each quarter of
the year. For examples, see Figure 4.1 or Appendix II. The maintenance tasks is
indexed in Table 4.2, see Appendix I for specification of each index.
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-10-08 2006-10-15 2006-10-22 2006-10-29 2006-11-05 2006-11-12 2006-11-19 2006-11-26 2006-12-03 2006-12-10 2006-12-17 2006-12-24
Date
Figure 4.1 The expected maintenance situation for the 4th qtr of 2006
33
4.5 Maintenance data analysis
Maintenance managers and engineers are frequently using the data information that
they do collect as the organizations daily work proceeds. They do not, however, share
their information with other organizations. Maintenance data are available, but not
shared, from many different sites all over the world. If this information is used in an
effective manner, it has the potential to be used by maintenance organizations, to gain
advantages over their competitors. The best way to accommodate this is, to share
relevant information amongst each user which is connected to the regarding system, in
a uniform and accurate manner. The information should also be provided timely, to
improve its statistic impact. Due to the increasing use of the internet, maintenance
organizations can have an on-line access connection to all the supporting information,
and can be used by maintenance engineers and managers for analysis and the
predicting of any future maintenance requirements. By collecting and performing
analysis of gathered maintenance data, the stocking and purchasing process will be
supported. To complete the information share task, it should also contain all
information on the technical system, and the location of the sharing asset. By this,
measurements of the maintenance systems performance and the comparison of the
environmental impact of the maintenance tasks can be made.
The total number of ATA 32 incidents in our fleet was 35, MTBF were calculated to
131 hours. For one quarter during one year, the three aircrafts in our fleet flies 1170
hours (TFh).
TFh
λt is given by λt = and by calculating the Poisson probability distribution
MTBF
function ƒ(t) and the Poisson cumulative distribution function F(t), the following
diagram can be drawn:
Probable number of ATA 32 failures during three months
0,14 1
0,12
distribution
0,75
Probability
0,1
distribution
Cumulatuve
function
function
0,08
0,5
0,06
0,04 0,25
0,02
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Number of failures
Probability distribution function Cumulative distribution function
Figure 4.2 Poisson probability- and cumulative- distribution functions of ATA 32 during three
months.
34
It becomes clear how many times this item is likely to fail, and how certain this
approximation is. The thinner and higher the probability mass function is, the more
certain the prediction is. In this case one may say that it is most likely that this item
will fail 7-10 times within the time frame of three months. Based on this information
decisions about spares provisioning may be possible to take, even though there are
more factors to be considered. This is further discussed in chapter 5.
Let’s say that there are a number of failures expected to randomly occur within a
certain period of time, based on knowledge of the past. Then, if extra checks are
performed in a given time interval, how likely is it, that one inspection will reveal a
failure within its incubation time? Or, as another approach, how many of these
failures are likely to be revealed within their incubation time? The last approach
seems to give some valuable information, let’s keep that track for a moment. If we
consider the probability of survival R(t) and failure rate F(t), within a limited time
period as an exponential distribution, they would be represented by:
1
R (t ) = e − λt and F (t ) = 1 − e − λt where λ =
MTBF
Then, if we know the incubation time ti for the failure, we can calculate the
probability to reveal failures within time ti from time zero, see Figure 4.3, to let’s say
14% i.e it’s probable that 14% of the failures occurs during that period of time. If we
choose to do extra checks at a certain time interval tc, the probability to reveal failures
at time tc would be 14% of the remaining 32% i.e 4,48%.
35
So, with knowledge of the total flight hours within the time frame TFh, the cost of the
unscheduled maintenance i.e down time DTcost, incubation time ti, MTBF, how long a
extra check would take Ct, the interval of extra checks Ci, MTTR (to repair the
failure), MDT, the maintenance cost per hour Mcost and the cost of the part needed
Pcost, we can calculate the approximate savings, or losses, that the extra check would
gain.
The number of the expected failures Nf during the period of time represents by:
TFh
Nf =
MTBF
If no extra checks are performed, we assume that all failures occur during or before
operation, and therefore, instantly results in operational losses, the total cost would
then be approximated to:
Tot .c no.checks = (MTTR ⋅ M cos t + Pcos t + MDT ⋅ DTcos t ) ⋅ N f
The total cost of these extra checks (repair excluded) can be calculated with:
TFh
Tot .cchecks = C t ⋅ M cos t ⋅
Ci
The total costs to repair the failures revealed due to these checks, here we assume that
these repairs do not affect on the operational availability, are then:
Tot .c revealed . f = (MTTR ⋅ M cos t + Pcos t ) ⋅ Frevealed
All failures will probably, and most certain, not be revealed during these checks. So,
the total costs for the rest of the failures will then be:
Tot .cunrevealed . f = (MTTR ⋅ M cos t + Pcos t + MDT ⋅ DTcos t ) ⋅ (N f − Frevealed )
So, to examine if it would give any savings to perform extra checks due to a failure
that randomly and frequently occur, we just calculate the difference between the total
costs when no extra checks are performed, and the total cost when performing extra
checks i.e
result = Tot .c no.checks − (Tot .c checks + Tot .c revealed . f + Tot .cunrevealed . f )
36
This theory was used for ATA 32, we
assumed that this failure has the
incubation time it = 15 flight hours and
extra checks are performed at an interval
of 200 hours, the result is presented in
Figure 4.4. The result are in fact not
realistic, due to our limitation where we
choose to consider the ATA groups as
single parts, though there would be a lot
of different failures, on different parts.
The most common failures in ATA 32
would probably be related to sensors and
switches, but if factors based on statistics
over a certain failure that occurs
randomly and frequent, this model can
be, although not perfect, but anyway an
approximate tool.
To check if Frevealed is likely true, we did a validation of these data where the failures
randomly where distributed over a certain period of time. And when we relate these
data to the extra checks, we can see if we will be able to reveal any failures. See
Figure 4.5, see the complete set for the fleet in Appendix IV.
2006-01-02
2006-01-16
2006-01-30
2006-02-13
2006-02-27
2006-03-13
2006-03-27
2006-04-10
2006-04-24
2006-05-08
2006-05-22
2006-06-05
2006-06-19
2006-07-03
2006-07-17
2006-07-31
2006-08-14
2006-08-28
2006-09-11
2006-09-25
2006-10-09
2006-10-23
2006-11-06
2006-11-20
2006-12-04
2006-12-18
Incidents Checks
Figure 4.5 The test shows that we probable would reveal 2 out of 11 failures with these extra
checks during a period of three months
These tests were randomized several times, some times we where able to spot up to
seven failures other times down to zero failures but most often around three to four
failures. So we must keep in mind that this is due to the characteristics of
randomization.
37
Chapter 5
DISCUSSION
5.1 Analysis reflections
The data analysis in the previous chapter shows very optimistic numbers due to the
limitations which were necessary to keep this study within reasonable limits. There
are a lot of factors left which has to be taken into consideration. First of all, only the
main landing gear ATA 32-10-00 contains of one to two hundred parts with
differentiated prices. So, the reducing of all these parts to only one part gives a
relative high failure rate for this ATA group, and then, we use the most common spare
part price, although, there are most likely some kind of parts which have a higher
failure rate than others, for example the brake system or sensors, switches, actuators,
electrical wires, its connectors and tubing which all are exposed to vibrations and
extreme changes of ambient conditions and some of them to bending and mechanical
wear. Frequent failures among components like these mentioned, can be spotted and
maybe prevented by following up and analyze the maintenance deviation reports.
Another thing to take into consideration is the fact that the operators are commonly
leasing the aircrafts, or parts of it, such as engines and landing gears. This is not
enough, there is also another economical issue which has to be considered, see, if the
part is easy to replace, and the failure consequence is not directly intruding the area of
safety, which is a valid situation with duplex or triplex redundant systems, there are
probably no need for preventive checks. On the other hand, this situation requires a
good logistic support so that the part is available just in time when they are needed.
This is a key to keep a good financial balance.
38
Finally, we would like to attach great importance to the fact that this study doesn’t
consider the influence of the aircrafts certain age, this due to lack of information.
Generally, is that the maintenance costs for an aircraft over its life cycle can be
defined as a bathtub curve. See Figure 5.1. Initially, in sector a, this is the test period,
the aircraft are tested under several operating conditions, after this period, the aircraft
is delivered to the operator and begins to operate. The total maintenance cost are
relatively high at the beginning, this is due to teething troubles, and evaluation of the
actual maintenance needs. The sampling period starts in sector c when the optimal
level of maintenance is reached and no teething troubles remains. The curve will tend
to increase after a while, this is due to structural problems like corrosion and fatigue,
which are strictly connected to the aircrafts age, and due to this, heavy maintenance
tasks must be performed. The organization disposes the aircraft during sector c. To be
more specific one may say that large airline organizations generally buy their aircrafts
at the beginning of sector b, and disposes them somewhere in the first half of sector c,
while small and medium sized airliners generally buy their aircrafts somewhere
around the transition of sector b and c, and disposes them in the beginning of sector d.
The three aircrafts in our sample fleet would be represented like this; Aircraft s/n 5
would be found in the beginning of sector d, aircraft s/n 17 would be found in the
beginning of sector c and aircraft s/n 29 would be found in the beginning of sector b.
This is a reality that must be considered during the maintenance and spare part
planning.
39
5.2 Logistic software
This study were initially performed to find a model to serve as a basis for spares
provisioning strategy as well as improvement of AMP strategy, but, why invent the
wheel once again?, there are a lot of software companies where some of them spent
up to 30 years of data analysis and development of mathematical strategies. The one
and only valid answer of this question would be that the license fees for such a
software tool are too high in comparison with the money saved by using it, at least for
smaller organizations. The license fees for a sufficient software regarding
maintenance and spares provisioning optimization, are commonly quite high,
approximately 10 000$ for one year. For the major sized operators this investment
commonly gives a great payback. What about the minor operators and the
organizations which are contracted by the operators? It may be difficult for a
maintenance organization to convince the operator that more maintenance with higher
maintenance cost, will reduce the long term cost due to increase of availability. So, a
simple tool which gives an approximate result of how much there is, if any, to save,
would be motivated to develop. However, this simple model is not perfect, but it may
be a base for further development.
Example 1:
Once again we will refer to Figure 4.2 Lets say that this figure shows the probable
amount of failures regarding to gear “down and locked” indicator light bulbs, for the
whole fleet. From the figure we estimate that 8 to 9 bulbs will
fail during a period of three months. The price of these bulbs is
relatively low and they don’t require a lot of stocking space, but
the consequence is that the aircraft will not be airworthy until
the bulb is replaced, which is a relatively easy and quick task.
As a conclusion to this example one may say that the cost of
stocking the bulbs constitute a fraction of the cost of aircraft
downtime, so the recommendation would be to keep at least 20
to 25 bulbs in stock for the three months period.
Figure 5.2 Indicators
40
Example 2:
Let’s say that an aircraft in landing configuration are on its final approach and
exposed to wind shear, this result in a hard touch down. After inspection, severe
structural damage to the main landing gears is detected. This situation are commonly
not high frequent in the failure statistics, so it’s not expected to occur very often. The
price of a main landing gear or the cost of repair is quite high, the MTTR is quite long
and the difference between MLDT and MTTR is big, this means that one are able
receive the new landing gear from the
manufacturer or overhaul department during
the time of which it takes to disassemble the
old landing gear from the aircraft. Due to the
high price, the operator usually pays a cycle
based fee to the manufacturer or overhaul
department, in which it includes the costs of
repair, overhaul and storage of landing gears.
Thereby it is no need for the operator to store
landing gears at a tremendous cost.
Figure 5.3 Broken landing gear
Note! The pictures in Figure 5.2 and 5.3 doesn’t have anything to do with the
examples
41
Chapter 6
RECOMMENDATIONS
It would be simple to recommend the organization to keep statistic records over all the
measurements mentioned in chapter 4.5 but, it’s not as easy as it seems. Even if all
organizations keeps records of deviations, they most likely doesn’t keep records of the
exact costs of each individual deviation and the actions taken i.e. the cost of; the
waiting for part and waiting for repair time, the actual mean time to repair, labor and
facility costs and the cost of spare parts needed. From these data and from the data in
the records already kept, it is possible to calculate all important measurements and
develop a strategy like the one mentioned in chapter 4.5. If such a strategy are
developed one may be able to monitor and, in detail, analyze the costs of deviations
regarding to preventive tasks and spare parts in storage. Thereby, the possibility of
savings of unscheduled maintenance costs can be achieved. With a well developed
method one may find the optimal balance in maintenance and its costs, or to be more
precisely, the cost of preventive maintenance vs. unscheduled maintenance for each
component see Figure 6.1. It can clearly be seen that, the lowest total maintenance
cost is at the curves intersection. The graph is pure fictive, but with a well performing
record philosophy, one may be able to create a similar graph with hardcore data.
Optimal balance
n/r actions
Unsceduled Preventive Total cost
Figure 6.1 Illustration of a possible relation between preventive vs. unscheduled maintenance for
one single part.
42
Chapter 7
CONCLUSION
Maintenance is a very vast subject which contains of various disciplines and
components. In the study, we analyzed the operation and maintenance data for
reliability, availability and costs. The study concludes maintenance task compiling
with tasks recognized and divided in to scheduled and unscheduled tasks. The failure
occurrences were analyzed and further, a preventive maintenance effect analysis was
performed. The logistics influence on maintenance planning, including spare parts
provisioning, was theoretically discussed. All aspects were not considered due to the
limited timeframe of the study and the difficulties to receive applicable data.
Although, there is scope for conducting further studies of this topic, because, there are
benefits to gain if the maintenance records is structured and analyzed in a suitable
manner. This makes the overview of the maintenance procedures and decision making
more accurate. Even though the initial cost of restructuring the maintenance record
keeping system may be high, it will certainly give a positive impact on the total
maintenance cost. For large and medium sized maintenance organizations, a well
performing and purposefully developed software will be a good investment. The
maintenance planning and the follow-up are therefore performed by statistics and
experiences. For small maintenance organizations, the cost of such software is higher
than the savings that can be achieved. After all, it is up to the organization to make the
decision, based on its economical circumstances and if it is economically justified to
implement commercial logistic software into the organization, or finance the
development of an adapted, much simpler but less effective system.
43
Chapter 8
REFERENCES
8.1 Literature
Billinton Roy, Allan Ronald N (1983) Reliability Evaluation of Engineering Systems
London: Pitman Books Limited ISBN 0-273-08484-4
Rigdon Steven E, Basu Asit P (2000) Statistical Methods for the Reliability of
Repairable Systems
New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc ISBN 0-471-34941-0
Slack Nigel, Chambers Stuart, Harland Christine, Harrison Alan, Johnston Robert
(1995) Operations management
London: Pitman Publishing ISBN 0-273-60316-7
44
8.2 Web
NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods,
http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/, accessed 18 May 2006
45
Appendix
46
Appendix I
This Appendix contains a table describing which tasks each notation of the scheduled
maintenance in Appendix II consists of.
I
Sceduled inspections Interval (hrs/cycl) Calendar time (months)
1 Phase 1 200 24
2 Phase 2 400 24
3 Phase 3 600 24
4 Phase 4 800 24
Special inspections/htc Pos: ATA nr: Interval (hrs/cycl) Calendar time (months)
a Comp.drive belt, Air conditioner 17 50
b Battery check, Rudder boost filter 12,48 200
c Battery acid check 13 390 3
d Fusulage pressure bulkhead 7 500
e Wing center section 63 600
f Stand by power supply 55 780 6
g Land.gear, Cab.doors, Fusulage, Eng.oil and air filter 1,2,3,5,15,18,20,27,34,36,44,51,58 1000
h Power levers 46 1200
i Sparcap 53 34.20; 26.20; 25.60 1560 12
j Light panel assembles 24 08.00 2000
k Wing center section 64 2340 18
l Fuel probe 38 2400
m Pressure bulkhead 14 2500
n Altim.syst, Oxyg.syst, Pito.syst, Static syst 9,43,45,57 34.00 3120 24
o Engine mount 26 3600
p Landing gear actuators 4,6 3900 30
q Emerg.door, Fire esting, Fligt control pulley brackets 21,31,32 5000
r Fire.esting, Oxyg.cyl, Sparcap, Wing bolt 29,42,54,60 7800 60
s Axel assemb, Drag brace, Retract.gearbox, Shock absorber 10,11,22,23,47,49,50 8000
t Fusel&Pres.bulkhead, Fusel, Frame, String, Skin, Ws corn, Fc br 8,16,33,35,37,41,52,59 10000
u Fire.esting, Main gear actuator 28,3 18720 144
Overhaoul and lifelimits ATA nr: Interval (hrs/cycl) Calendar time (months)
I Instrument air filter 37.00 600
II Engine oil and P3 air filters 72.00; 73.10 1000
III Hot section inspection 72.00 1800
IV Battery check/replacement 3000
V Oxygen shut off valve 35.00 3120 24
VI Engine overhaul 72.00; 61.20; 73.10; 73.20; 75.30; 79.20 3600
VII Propeller 61.10 4000
VIII Cabin door latches 5000
IX Actuators 32.30 7500
X Brakes system and flam.liquid carrying hoses 32.40 7800 60
XI Landing gear motor 32.30 8000
XII All wing attach bolts, nuts and barrel nut assembles 9360 72
XIII Cabin door attaching hardware, ws frame screws 10000
XIV Life limits on engine static and rotating part 72.00 20000
XV All wing attach bolts, nuts and barrel nut assembles 23400 180
XVI Life limits on engine static and rotating part, wing structure fatigue 72.00 30000
XVII Horizontal and vertical stabilizer 45000
Appendix II
This Appendix contains of bar charts over the scheduled and unscheduled
maintenance for the three sample aircrafts together with explanation tables. Be aware
that each task in these charts/tables actually contains of several tasks which is to be
performed at the same timely interval, refer to Appendix I for details.
II
Aircraft s/n 5
Aircraft s/n 5 1st qtr 2006
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-01-02 2006-01-09 2006-01-16 2006-01-23 2006-01-30 2006-02-06 2006-02-13 2006-02-20 2006-02-27 2006-03-06 2006-03-13 2006-03-20
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-04-04 2006-04-11 2006-04-18 2006-04-25 2006-05-02 2006-05-09 2006-05-16 2006-05-23 2006-05-30 2006-06-06 2006-06-13 2006-06-20
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-07-07 2006-07-14 2006-07-21 2006-07-28 2006-08-04 2006-08-11 2006-08-18 2006-08-25 2006-09-01 2006-09-08 2006-09-15 2006-09-22
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-10-08 2006-10-15 2006-10-22 2006-10-29 2006-11-05 2006-11-12 2006-11-19 2006-11-26 2006-12-03 2006-12-10 2006-12-17 2006-12-24
Date
II-i
Aircraft s/n 5
Maintenance tasks 1st qtr Maintenance tasks 2nd qtr Maintenance tasks 3rd qtr Maintenance tasks 4th qtr
2006-01-02 ATA 25 2006-04-04 a 2006-07-07 ATA 32 2006-10-08 ATA 25
2006-01-06 ATA 32 2006-04-14 ATA 25 2006-07-07 a 2006-10-08 a
2006-01-12 2,a,b 2006-04-16 ATA 76 2006-07-08 ATA 25 2006-10-17 ATA 79
2006-01-15 ATA 79 2006-04-16 4,a,b 2006-07-12 ATA 32 2006-10-20 4,a,b
2006-01-20 ATA 32 2006-04-21 ATA 32 2006-07-18 3,a,b,e,I,III 2006-10-22 ATA 32
2006-01-24 a 2006-04-27 a 2006-07-19 ATA 32 2006-10-27 ATA 72
2006-02-05 a,d 2006-05-03 ATA 72 2006-07-20 ATA 25 2006-11-01 a
2006-02-06 2006-05-09 a 2006-07-24 ATA 79 2006-11-12 a
2006-02-10 ATA 79 2006-05-14 ATA 72 2006-07-26 ATA 32 2006-11-13 ATA 25
2006-02-14 c,f 2006-05-16 c 2006-07-30 a 2006-11-15 ATA 79
2006-02-16 a 2006-05-20 ATA 32 2006-08-02 ATA 76 2006-11-15 c
2006-02-26 ATA 25 2006-05-21 a 2006-08-11 a 2006-11-24 a
2006-03-03 ATA 32 2006-06-02 1,a,b,d,g,j,II 2006-08-12 ATA 72 2006-11-25 ATA 72
2006-03-23 a 2006-06-03 ATA 25 2006-08-13 ATA 76 2006-11-30 ATA 79
2006-06-04 ATA 79 2006-08-15 c,f,i,n,V 2006-12-06 2,a,b,e,h,I
2006-06-09 ATA 25 2006-08-15 ATA 25 2006-12-08 ATA 32
2006-06-13 ATA 25, ATA 32 2006-08-17 ATA 76 2006-12-10 ATA 72
2006-06-13 a 2006-08-20 ATA 79 2006-12-12 ATA 25
2006-06-25 a 2006-08-21 ATA 25 2006-12-13 ATA 72
2006-08-22 a 2006-12-17 ATA 25
2006-08-25 ATA 32 2006-12-17 a
2006-08-29 ATA 25, ATA 32 2006-12-29 a
2006-08-30 ATA 25
2006-09-03 4,a,b
2006-09-15 a
2006-09-16 ATA 25
2006-09-20 ATA 32
2006-09-26 ATA 25
2006-09-27 a,d
II-ii
Aircraft s/n 17
Aircraft s/n 17 1st qtr 2006
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-01-08 2006-01-15 2006-01-22 2006-01-29 2006-02-05 2006-02-12 2006-02-19 2006-02-26 2006-03-05 2006-03-12 2006-03-19 2006-03-26
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-04-06 2006-04-13 2006-04-20 2006-04-27 2006-05-04 2006-05-11 2006-05-18 2006-05-25 2006-06-01 2006-06-08 2006-06-15 2006-06-22 2006-06-29
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-07-02 2006-07-09 2006-07-16 2006-07-23 2006-07-30 2006-08-06 2006-08-13 2006-08-20 2006-08-27 2006-09-03 2006-09-10 2006-09-17
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-10-02 2006-10-09 2006-10-16 2006-10-23 2006-10-30 2006-11-06 2006-11-13 2006-11-20 2006-11-27 2006-12-04 2006-12-11 2006-12-18
Date
II-iii
Aircraft s/n 17
Maintenance tasks 1st qtr Maintenance tasks 2nd qtr Maintenance tasks 3rd qtr
2006-01-08 a 2006-04-06 ATA 25 2006-07-02 1,a,b
2006-01-13 ATA 25 2006-04-10 ATA 25 2006-07-06 ATA 25
2006-01-17 ATA 32 2006-04-12 a 2006-07-08 ATA 32
2006-01-19 a 2006-04-16 ATA 79 2006-07-13 ATA 76
2006-01-24 c,f,i,k,n,u,V,XII 2006-04-24 a 2006-07-14 a
2006-01-25 ATA 76 2006-04-26 a 2006-07-25 a,c,d,f,p
2006-01-31 a 2006-05-07 a 2006-07-30 ATA 32
2006-02-06 ATA 25 2006-05-13 ATA 32 2006-07-31 ATA 25
2006-02-12 2,a,b 2006-05-15 ATA 32, ATA 79 2006-08-04 ATA 76
2006-02-16 ATA 32 2006-05-18 4,a,b,e,h,l,I 2006-08-06 a
2006-02-18 ATA 25 2006-05-21 ATA 25 2006-08-09 ATA 25
2006-02-23 a 2006-05-30 ATA 25 2006-08-15 ATA 25
2006-03-02 ATA 25 2006-05-30 a 2006-08-18 2,a,b,II
2006-03-07 a 2006-06-04 ATA 25 2006-08-23 ATA 72
2006-03-15 ATA 25 2006-06-08 ATA 25 2006-08-29 ATA 32
2006-03-19 a 2006-06-09 a 2006-08-29 a
2006-03-20 ATA 25 2006-06-12 ATA 32 2006-09-02 ATA 25, ATA 79
2006-03-27 ATA 25, ATA 79 2006-06-13 ATA 32 2006-09-04 ATA 25
2006-03-30 3,a,b,d,g,II 2006-06-14 ATA 25 2006-09-10 a
2006-06-20 a 2006-09-22 a
2006-06-22 ATA 79
2006-06-26 ATA 79
2006-06-30
Maintenance tasks 4th qtr
2006-10-02 ATA 32
2006-10-03 ATA 32
2006-10-04 3,a,b,e,I,III
2006-10-06 ATA 25
2006-10-15 a
2006-10-21 ATA 25
2006-10-25 c
2006-10-27 a
2006-10-29 ATA 25
2006-10-30 ATA 76
2006-10-31 ATA 32
2006-11-04 ATA 25
2006-11-07 ATA 76
2006-11-08 a
2006-11-10 ATA 25
2006-11-19 4,a,b,d,g,j,m,q,t,VII,VIII,XIII,XIV
2006-11-27 ATA 25
2006-12-01 a
2006-12-13 a
2006-12-24 a
II-iv
Aircraft s/n 29
Aircraft s/n 29 1st qtr 2006
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-01-05 2006-01-12 2006-01-19 2006-01-26 2006-02-02 2006-02-09 2006-02-16 2006-02-23 2006-03-02 2006-03-09 2006-03-16 2006-03-23 2006-03-30
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-04-02 2006-04-09 2006-04-16 2006-04-23 2006-04-30 2006-05-07 2006-05-14 2006-05-21 2006-05-28 2006-06-04 2006-06-11 2006-06-18 2006-06-25
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-07-11 2006-07-18 2006-07-25 2006-08-01 2006-08-08 2006-08-15 2006-08-22 2006-08-29 2006-09-05 2006-09-12 2006-09-19 2006-09-26
Date
14
12
Number of tasks
10
8
6
4
2
0
2006-10-01 2006-10-08 2006-10-15 2006-10-22 2006-10-29 2006-11-05 2006-11-12 2006-11-19 2006-11-26 2006-12-03 2006-12-10 2006-12-17 2006-12-24
Date
II-v
Aircraft s/n 29
Maintenance tasks 1st qtr Maintenance tasks 2nd qtr Maintenance tasks 3rd qtr
2006-01-05 a 2006-04-02 ATA 25 2006-07-11 a
2006-01-17 3,a,b 2006-04-04 ATA 79 2006-07-11 ATA 25
2006-01-27 ATA 32 2006-04-10 a 2006-07-17 ATA 25
2006-01-29 a 2006-04-21 1,a,b 2006-07-23 3,a,b,d,g,I,II,IV
2006-01-30 ATA 25 2006-04-21 ATA 25, ATA 79 2006-08-04 a
2006-02-01 ATA 25 2006-04-24 ATA 32 2006-08-08 ATA 76
2006-02-09 a 2006-04-30 ATA 25 2006-08-11 ATA 25
2006-02-10 ATA 25 2006-05-04 a 2006-08-15 a
2006-02-19 c,f,k 2006-05-10 ATA 25 2006-08-16 ATA 76
2006-02-21 a 2006-05-16 a 2006-08-20 c,f,i,n,V
2006-03-05 ATA 25 2006-05-17 ATA 25 2006-08-24 ATA 32
2006-03-06 ATA 25 2006-05-18 ATA 25 2006-08-27 a
2006-03-06 4,a,b,e,h,l,I 2006-05-23 c 2006-08-28 ATA 25
2006-03-11 ATA 25 2006-05-28 a 2006-08-31 ATA 72
2006-03-17 a 2006-05-30 ATA 25 2006-09-08 4,a,b
2006-03-24 ATA 79 2006-05-29 ATA 79 2006-09-13 ATA 25
2006-03-29 a,d,m 2006-06-03 ATA 79 2006-09-14 ATA 25
2006-03-30 ATA 25 2006-06-06 2,a,b 2006-09-17 ATA 25
2006-06-18 a 2006-09-18 ATA 25
2006-06-22 ATA 25 2006-09-20 a
2006-06-23 ATA 72 2006-09-28 ATA 25
2006-06-30 a
Maintenance tasks 4th qtr
2006-10-01 a
2006-10-02 ATA 25
2006-10-03 ATA 76
2006-10-04 ATA 79
2006-10-11 ATA 25
2006-10-13 a
2006-10-14 ATA 72
2006-10-18 ATA 25, ATA 32
2006-10-25 ATA 72
2006-10-25 a,b
2006-10-27 ATA 25
2006-11-02 ATA 25
2006-11-03 ATA 76
2006-11-17 a,d
2006-11-19 a
2006-11-23 ATA 79
2006-11-28 ATA 79
2006-11-29 a
2006-12-06 ATA 32
2006-12-10 ATA 32
2006-12-10 2,a,b,e,h,o,I,III,VI
2006-12-13 ATA 32
2006-12-20 ATA 32
2006-12-22 a
2006-12-29 ATA 79
II-vi
Appendix III
This Appendix contains of combined bar charts and graphs which describes the
probable number of failures during three months for the five ATA groups which was
studied. Based on Poisson’s functions, probability mass function and cumulative
distribution function.
III
Probable number of ATA 25 failures during three months
0,1 1
0,08
0,75
distribution
Cumulatuve
distribution
Probability
function
function
0,06
0,5
0,04
0,25
0,02
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Number of failures
Probability distribution function Cumulative distribution function
0,14 1
0,12
distribution
0,75
Probability
0,1
distribution
Cumulatuve
function
function
0,08
0,5
0,06
0,04 0,25
0,02
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Number of failures
Probability distribution function Cumulative distribution function
0,3 1
0,25
0,75
distribution
Cumulatuve
distribution
Probability
0,2
function
function
0,15 0,5
0,1
0,25
0,05
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Number of failures
Probability distribution function Cumulative distribution function
III-i
Probable number of ATA 76 failures during three months
0,25 1
0,2
0,75
distribution
Cumulatuve
distribution
Probability
function
function
0,15
0,5
0,1
0,25
0,05
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Number of failures
Probability distribution function Cumulative distribution function
0,2 1
0,15 0,75
distribution
Cumulatuve
distribution
Probability
function
function
0,1 0,5
0,05 0,25
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Number of failures
Probability distribution function Cumulative distribution function
III-ii
Appendix IV
This Appendix contains of a test of distribution of failure, relative extra checks for
the sample fleet.
IV
2006-01-02 2006-01-02 2006-01-02
2006-01-16 2006-01-16 2006-01-16
2006-01-30 2006-01-30 2006-01-30
2006-02-13 2006-02-13 2006-02-13
2006-02-27 2006-02-27 2006-02-27
2006-03-13 2006-03-13 2006-03-13
2006-03-27 2006-03-27 2006-03-27
2006-04-10 2006-04-10 2006-04-10
2006-04-24 2006-04-24 2006-04-24
2006-05-08 2006-05-08 2006-05-08
2006-05-22 2006-05-22 2006-05-22
2006-06-05 2006-06-05 2006-06-05
2006-06-19 2006-06-19 2006-06-19
2006-07-03 2006-07-03 2006-07-03
2006-07-17 2006-07-17 2006-07-17
Incidents
Incidents
Incidents
2006-07-31 2006-07-31 2006-07-31
2006-08-14 2006-08-14 2006-08-14
Checks
Checks
Checks
2006-08-28 2006-08-28 2006-08-28
2006-09-11 2006-09-11 2006-09-11
2006-09-25 2006-09-25 2006-09-25
2006-10-09 2006-10-09 2006-10-09
2006-10-23 2006-10-23 2006-10-23
2006-11-06 2006-11-06 2006-11-06
Test of distribution of failure relative extra checks for the sample fleet
IV
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
0 INTRODUCTION
Chapter: Page:
0 INTRODUCTION
1 GENERAL
2 MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES
0 INTRODUCTION
Chapter: Page:
Sign: Stamp:
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Sign: Stamp:
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Sign: Stamp:
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Sign: Stamp:
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Sign: Stamp:
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Sign: Stamp:
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Sign: Stamp:
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
1 GENERAL
This maintenance programme, upon which the SCAA approval of Sample Fleet under JAR-OPS
1 subpart M is based, defines and specifies maintenance that is required to be carried out on the
aircraft specified.
The programme is approved by the undersigned and must be complied with, as applicable, in order
to ensure that the aircraft and material are kept airworthy.
The contents of this programme is subject to periodic (annual or more frequent) review to ensure
that they reflect current Type Certificate holders recommendations, revisions to maintenance
manuals, mandatory requirements and maintenance needs of the aircraft, modifications and service
experience. It is further understood that practices and procedures to satisfy the programme must be
to the standards specified in the Type Certificate holders Maintenance Instructions.
It is accepted that these procedures do not override the necessity of complying with any new or
amended regulation published by EASA/SCAA from time to time where these new or amended
regulations are in conflict with this programme.
It is understood that SCAA will approve Sample Fleet whilst SCAA is satisfied that the
procedures are being followed. It is further understood that SCAA reserves the right to suspend
or cancel the maintenance programme approval of the organisation, as applicable, if SCAA has
evidence that the procedures are not followed or valid.
..........................................
Maintenance Manager
(Nominated Postholder for Maintenance)
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
1.2 APPLICABILITY
1.2.1 The Aircraft Maintenance Programme, AMP is applicable on the following aircraft:
The programme is designed by Luleå Flygteknik ( SE.145.0112) and used by the operator
Sample Fleet , Luleå, in accordance with the companies Maintenance Management Exposition,
MME.
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Contains details of the maintenance organisation structure, the procedures that must be
followed to satisfy the maintenance responsibility of JAR-OPS 1.890 and the quality functions
of JAR-OPS 1.900.
a. All maintenance in accordance with this programme (JAR-OPS 1.890 (a) (3))
b. Rectification to an approved standard of defects and damages (1.890 (a) (2))
c. Any Operational Directive, Airworthiness Directive and any other continued
Airworthiness Requirement made mandatory by the Authority (1.890 (a) (5))
d. Modifications in accordance with an approved standard (1.890 (a) (6))
Note:
For details of documentation from manufacturers and authorities for which this programme is
based on, refer to AMP 1.7.
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
The maintenance programme contains inspection intervals in flight time as well as calendar
time and cycles, for the Phase Inspections 1 to 4, (Ref: chapter 3 to 6). Special inspections (
Ref: chapter 7 and 8 ) and component overhauls having both flight time, calendar time and or
flight cycle inspection or overhaul intervals are also listed with both variables.
Established check periods can only be escalated when at least one of the following criteria’s
exists:
Pos: Criteria:
a. The operator can show that the applicable check period is not relevant in the
Operators operating environment.
c. The operator has received approval from the Type Certificate Holder to escalate the
check period.
In all cases, the operator must get approval from SCAA, to get approval the operator must
send the following to SCAA:
Pos: Criteria:
a. The proposed revision to the maintenance programme
b. Justification to the proposed change (see also 1.8)
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
The maintenance programme is based on the following publications and documents. A list of
the latest revision is kept by the operator Sample Fleet technical department. Responsible for
the technical documents is the operator, ( JAR-OPS 1 subpart M ).
Revisions will be made and send to SCAA for approval, if changes in the procedures is or are
necessarily. At least one of the following criteria below will state an revision.
Pos: Criteria:
1 Additions of tasks.
2 Deletions of tasks.
3 Modifications to tasks.
4 Changes in tasks frequencies.
5 Changes to the list of aircraft subject to the maintenance program.
Amendments are prepared by the operators maintenance manager, who then sends the
following to SCAA:
Pos:
1 The proposed revision of the operators maintenance program.
If the revision are approved, SCAA will stamp and sign the programme list of effective pages
and then send the page of effective list back to the operator.
Until the Authority has approved the amendment, the previously approved revision must be
used.
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
The operator may only vary the periods prescribed by the programme with the approval of
SCAA.
Note 1:
For items controlled by more than one limit, the more restrictive limit shall be applied.
Note 2:
Maximum variations level is in accordance with JAA-Leflet 26.
The operator is NOT allowed to accept variations from the aircraft maintenance programs
procedures as described below.
Pos:
1 Life limitations
2 Airworthiness directives
3 Maintenance Program tasks which have been classified as mandatory by the TC-holder
or by the Authority.
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Pos: Information:
1 Aircraft identifikation
2 Justification of the need for such a variation
3 Proposed extension
4 Current inspection status of the aircraft
5 List of aircraft deferred defects which are affected by the variation
6 Confirmation that continued compliance with mandatory life limitation is not affected
by the variation, and where deemed necessary by the Authority, updated list of AD`s,
life limited parts, etc.
7 Compensation tasks (i. e. additional maintenance tasks undertaken to be performed
before the new proposed limit)
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
The Operators Maintenance Manager is responsible for reviewing the maintenance programme
at regular basis. Upon receipt of revisions of the technical publications, the Maintenance
Manager shall check whether these revisions affects the maintenance program.
Apart from these revisions, the operators Maintenance Manager and/or staff from the
Operators Maintenance Department, shall review the maintenance programme annually for
continued validity in the light of operating experience.
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
The following recurrent airworthiness directives are applicable to the aircraft, but the
inspection intervals do not coincide within the Phase-Inspections 1 to 4.
2. Sample Fleet is using on behalf of Luleå Flygteknik the computerized system “CAMS”
( Computerized Aircraft maintenance System ), for follow-up of all scheduled and
unscheduled items.
2.1 General
Pos:
1 Inspections
2 Component overhaul
3 Mandatory replacement schedules for the aircraft
2.1.1 Documentations
The inspections, overhauls, life limits, etc outlined below in 2.2 to 2.6, should contain a
reference to a document issued by the TC-holder or the Authority and the revision status (date)
of this document unless the item has been introduced by the operator.
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Daily inspection shall be accomplished prior to the first flight of each day. This inspection
consists of visual examinations and functional checks to determine that the aircraft is
completely operational and ready for safe flight.
This inspection can be performed by a pilot, after he/she has received proper training and has
been certified by the operators maintenance manager.
A complete inspection cycle is 800 hours or 24 months. The inspection cycle is divided into
four phases and each inspection cycle is done at 200 hours with each consecutive phase 200
hours after the previous phase. The Phase 1, 2, 3 and 4 inspections provide a thorough
inspection of specific components and systems and occur at 200-hour intervals. A complete
inspection cycle is as follows:
2.3.4 Acceptable deviations from the schedule inspection program of the Raisbeck
- System
This section consists of components that are subject to a thorough inspection based on
calendar time, operating hours or cycles which do not coincide with the intervals established
by the scheduled inspection program.
2.4.1 Limitations
Note:
Structural limitations
Items NOT listed are to be overhauled or replaced “On condition”. If “On condition” items are
worn, inoperative, inaccurate, intermittent and are not repairable through normal maintenance
practices, they must be overhauled or replaced.
Note:
Note 1:
TBO Extension is permitted in accordance with P&W SB 3003, §3.C. Transfer of existing
TBO Extension Programme (7500 hours TBO) from previous operator is allowed, using a
specific formula.
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
Example:
Abbreviated Cycle Factor = 10
No. of Starts = 3000
No. of Flights = 9000
Flight Count Factor = 1
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
Certifies that the work specified except as otherwise specified was carried out in accordance with
PART – 145.50, and in respect to that work the aircraft is considered ready for release to service.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
2. WINDSHIELD 56-10-00
a) INSPECT WINDSHIELD FOR CRACKS AND
VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT
b) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER SEAL
(Silicone) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS OR
WEAR
c) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER HUMP
SEAL (Polysulfide) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS
OR WEAR
d) INSPECT WINDSHIELD ATTACHEMENT
SCREWS FOR 20-INCH-POUNDS OF TORQUE
3. WINDOWS – INSPECT EXTERIOR SURFACE OF 56-15-00
COCKPIT SIDE WINDOWS FOR DEEP
SCRATCHES, CRACKS, CHIPS OR EXCESS
CRAZING OR OTHER DAMAGE
SAMPLE FLEET AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
Mechanical and Hydraulic Landing Gear Systems –
Since battery voltage is not sufficient to properly cycle
The landing gear, use only an external power source
Capable of delivering and maintaining 28.25 +/- 0.25
Volts throughout the extension and retraction cycles
when performing the landing gear retraction inspection.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
CAUTION:
DO NOT MIX different brands of grease as this will cause decreased bearing life. If the grease
is changed, make certain that all the affected components are thoroughly cleaned before
relubrication.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
CAUTION:
DO NOT MIX different brands of grease as this will cause decreased bearing life. If the grease
is changed, make certain that all the affected components are thoroughly cleaned before
relubrication.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
WARNING:
Remove the lubrication fitting opposite the one being serviced. Failure to do so could result in
damage to the propeller bearings and seals.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 1 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
Certifies that the work specified except as otherwise specified was carried out in accordance with
PART – 145.50, and in respect to that work the aircraft is considered ready for release to service.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
2. WINDSHIELD 56-10-00
a) INSPECT WINDSHIELD FOR CRACKS AND
VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT
b) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER SEAL
(Silicone) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS OR
WEAR
c) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER HUMP
SEAL (Polysulfide) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS
OR WEAR
3. WINDOWS – INSPECT EXTERIOR SURFACE OF 56-15-00
COCKPIT SIDE WINDOWS FOR DEEP
SCRATCHES, CRACKS, CHIPS OR EXCESS
CRAZING OR OTHER DAMAGE
4. ALTERNATE AIR VALVE – DRAIN OFF ALL 34-00-00
MOISTURE
5. SEAT TRACKS – INSPECT SEAT TRACKS FOR 25-10-00
DAMAGE AND WEAR
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
30-60-00
1. PROPELLER DEICER – INSPECT PROPELLER CMM
DEICE SYSTEM (spinner removal required)
2. P3 AIR FILTER – INSPECT THE FILTER FOR P&W
CLEANLINESS
3. FUEL FILTERS AND SCREENS - 28-20-00
INSPECT THE FIREWALL FILTER FOR 12-10-00
EVIDENCE OF FOREIGN MATTER,
CORROSION OR MICROBIOLOGICAL
GROWTH IN THE FUEL SYSTEM. IF ANY
MICROBIOLOGICAL GROWTH IS FOUND,
USE BIBOR JF ADDITIVE
4. PROPELLERS 61
a) INSPECT FOR DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
(spinner removal required)
b) INSPECT THE CARBON BLOCK PIN FOR
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
c) CHECK FOR NO METAL-TO-METAL CONTACT
BETWEEN THE BRASS RING AND THE
REVERSING LEVER
d) INSPECT MECHANICAL FEEDBACK RING
STOP RODS AND SPRINGS FOR DAMAGE
e) INSPECT THE REVERSING LINKAGE FOR 76-00-00
CORRECT ADJUSTMENT, EVIDENCE OF
BINDING AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
5. HIGH PRESSURE FUEL PUMP FILTERS – P&W
INSPECT THE ENGINE-DRIVEN HIGH
PRESSURE FUEL PUMP FILTERS
6. ENGINE OIL FILTER – INSPECT FOR METAL P&W
PARTICLES
7. ENGINE-DRIVEN FUEL PUMP COUPLING P&W
SHAFT – (Sundstrand pumps only)-INSPECT FOR 73-10-02
FRETTING AND/OR CORROSION WHEN
REPLACING OUTLET FILTER
8. DRAIN PLUGS – INSPECT ALL DRAIN PLUGS 79-00-00
FOR LEAKAGE, SECURITY AND SAFETYING
9 . RIGHT-HAND ENGINE – INSPECT ALL AC.43.13-
SYSTEMS, ALL COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT. CHECK ALL TUBES AND
HOSES FOR GENERAL CONDITION, LEAKS
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
10.COWLING – REMOVE ENTIRE COWLING AND 71-10-00
INSPECT SKIN, STRUCTURE AND ATTACHING
HARDWARE FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND
CORROSION
11. OIL COOLER – INSPECT OIL COOLER AND 79-00-00
PLUMBING FOR LEAKAGE, DAMAGE AND
ATTACHMENT
12. OIL PRESSURE SNUBBER (p/n: 3R1) WITH 12-10-00
POROUS TYPE ELEMENT – CLEAN
ELEMENT
13. AFT COWLING ACCESS DOOR LATCHES – 71-10-00
CHECK ADJUSTMENT OF LATCHES
14. FIRE SEALS-INSPECT FOR CONDITION 71-00-00
15. ENGINE EXHAUST SYSTEM P&W
a) INSPECT ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR 78-00-00
WEAR, DAMAGE AND CORROSION
b) INSPECT THE EXHAUST SYSTEM AND
VISIBLE PORTIONS OF THE POWER TURBINE
FOR BURNING, DISTORSION, DAMAGE AND
CRACKS
16. ENGINE AND PROPELLERS CONTROLS N/A
a) CHECK CONTROLS AND ASSOCIATED
EQUIPMENT FOR BINDING, STIFF OPERATION
FULL TRAVEL AND FRICTION LOCK
b) INSPECT CONTROLS, BOLTS, NUTS
COTTER PINS AND SAFETIES FOR
CORROSION, DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
NOTE:
Special attention should be made to the cam box.
c) INSPECT CONTROL CABLES FOR DAMAGE 12-20-00
SUCH AS CRIMPS, CUTS, ABRASIONS OR
TIGHT BENDS. IF EXTERIOR COVERING
IS RUPTURED, PERFORM LEAK TEST
17. CONTROL CABLE BOOTS – INSPECT THE N/A
CONTROL CABLE BOOTS FOR EXCESSIVE
COMPRESSION, TWIST, WEAR OR AGING
WHICH COULD CAUSE BINDING
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
18. COMPRESSOR INLET – REMOVE THE AIR P&W
INLET SCREEN AND INSPECT THE
COMPRESSOR INLET AREA, STRUTS, FIRST
STAGE BLADES AND VANES FOR DIRT
DEPOSITS, CORROSION, EROSION, CRACKS
AND DAMAGE BY FOREIGN OBJECTS. Refer
To the Engine Maintenance Manual for corrective
Action.
19. MAGNETIC CHIP DETECTOR 12-10-00
a) REMOVE AND VISUALLY INSPECT PLUG FOR
METAL PARTICLES AND DAMAGE
b) CHECK LIGHT IN ANNUNCIATOR PANEL FOR
PROPER OPERATION
20. ENGINE P&W
a) INSPECT FUEL NOZZLES PER
MANUFACTURERS MANUAL
b) INSPECT ENGINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE INSTRUCTIONS FOUND IN THE ENGINE
MANUFACTURERS MANUAL
21. IGNITION EXCITER 74-00-00
a) INSPECT EXCITER AND ELECTRICAL
HARNESS FOR DAMAGE AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
b) INSPECT THAT SUPPLY CABLE AND
IGNITION CABLE CONNECTORS ARE
INSTALLED AND SAFETIED
22. SPARK IGNITERS PLUGS – INSPECT THE P&W
IGNITER PLUGS AS DESCRIBED IN THE
ENGINE MAINTENANCE MANUAL
23. FUEL PURGE SYSTEM/FUEL DRAIN 71-70-00
COLLECTOR SYSTEM
1. CHECK TANK, PUMP, PUMP FILTER AND
PLUMBING FOR LEAKS AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
2. PERFORM A PRESSURE TEST ON THE
COLLECTOR TANK
3. CHECK WIRING TO COLLECTOR PUMP AND
TANK FLOAT SWITCH FOR DAMAGE AND
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
4. CHECK COLLECTOR PUMP FOR PROPER
OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
24. ENGINE MOUNT TRUSS ASSEMBLY 71-20-00
a) INSPECT FOR CRACKS, DENTS, CHAFING
AND CORROSION, SPECIAL ATTENTION
SHOULD BE MADE TO AREAS AROUND
CLAMPS
b) INSPECT VIBRATION ISOLATORS (mounts)
FOR DETERIORATION, DAMAGE AND
ATTACHMENT
25. INDUCTION SYSTEM 30-20-00
a) CHECK THE INERTIAL ANTI-ICER VANE
AND BYPASS DOOR FOR FREEDOM OF
MOVEMENT AND CORRECT TRAVEL WITH
THE ELECTRICAL ACTUATOR AND THE
MANUAL OVERRIDE
b) INSPECT THE ENGINE INLET SCREEN,
INERTIAL SEPARATOR AND AIR INLET DUCT
FOR OBSTRUCTION AND DAMAGE
27. ENGINE FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM 26-10-00
a) FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM – CHECK ALL FIRE
DETECTORS FOR SENSITIVITY AND
CONTINUITY
1. CHECK THAT FIRE DETECTION SENSOR
ELEMENT IS NOT KINKED, CHAFED OR
BENT AT A RADIUS OF LESS THAN 2 INCHES
2. CHECK THAT THE FIRE DETECTION SENSOR
ELEMENT DOES NOT TOUCH THE
SOURROUNDING STRUCTURE AND THAT
ATTACHMENT POINTS ARE SECURE
3. CHECK THE FIRE DETECTION SYSTEM FOR
CONTINUITY
28. PROPELLER SYNCHROPHASER – TYPE 1 61-22-00
1. INSPECT FOR PROPER GAP BETWEEN
PICKUPS AND TARGETS
2. INSPECT DRIVE UNIT FOR DAMAGE, CMM
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT, ELECTRICAL
CONNECTIONS, WEAR AND PROPER RIGGING
3. CHECK ROD END BEARING FOR DAMAGE
AND LUBRICATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
29. AUTOFEATHER AND AUTOIGNITION 61-21-00
PRESSURE SWITCHES – INSPECT SECURITY 74-00-00
OF ATTACHEMENT, LEAKAGE AND
ELECTRICAL CONNECTION FOR SECURITY
30. PRIMARY PROPELLER GOVERNOR – 61-20-00
INSPECT FOR SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT,
LEAKAGE, AND SECURITY OF ELECTRICAL
CONNECTORS AND WIRING
31. OVERSPEED GOVERNOR – INSPECT FOR 61-20-00
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT, LEAKAGE
AND SECURITY OF ELECTRICAL
CONNECTORS AND WIRING
32. ENVIRONMENTAL BLEED AIR FLOW 21-10-00
CONTROL VALVE – INSPECT VALVE AND 21-11-00
ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, ELECTRICAL
WIRING AND DUCTS FOR DAMAGE,
SECURITY OF CONNECTIONS AND
ATTACHMENT
33. STARTER GENERATOR – INSPECT ONE SET 24-30-00
OF BRUSHES FOR INDICATIONS OF
EXCESSIVE WEAR OR DAMAGE (determine
Wear by observing diagonal groove on brush)
34. AIR CONDITIONING COMPRESSOR 21-50-00
a) INSPECT FOR SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
AND OIL LEAKS
b) INSPECT FOR WEAR AND LUBRICATE THE
SPLINE ON THE PULLEY END OF THE QUILL
SHAFT
c) INSPECT DRIVE BELT FOR DETERIORATION
WEAR AND PROPER TENSION
d) CHECK FOR PROPER COMPRESSOR OIL 12-10-00
LEVEL
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
NOTE:
Mechanical and Hydraulic Landing Gear Systems –
Since battery voltage is not sufficient to properly cycle
The landing gear, use only an external power source
Capable of delivering and maintaining 28.25 +/- 0.25
Volts throughout the extension and retraction cycles
when performing the landing gear retraction inspection.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
4. UPLOCK INDICATOR SWITCHES 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR SECURITY AND PROPER
OPERATION OF SWITCHES
b) CLEAN TERMINALS AND CONNECTORS
AS REQUIRED
c) CHECK WIRING FOR DAMAGE AND
SECURITY OF CONNECTION
5. WARNING HORN – CHECK OPERATION 32-60-00
6. MAIN GEAR DOWNLOCKS – CHECK LOCKING 32
MECHANISM FOR POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT
IN EXTENDED POSITION
7. SAFETY SWITCH – CHECK FOR PROPER 32-60-00
OPERATION
8. ACTUATORS – CHECK FOR NOISE, BINDING 32-30-00
AND PROPER RIGGING 32-31-00
9. LIMIT SWITCHES – (Mechanical Gear) 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR CORRECT ADJUSTMENT
b) CHECK FOR SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
10. EMERGENCY EXTENSION (Mechanical Gear) 32-30-00
CHECK SYSTEM FOR FREEDOM OF
OPERATION AND POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT
OF DOWNLOCKS.
CAUTION:
Do not continue operation after receiving a gear-down
indication on all gears. Further movement of the handle
could damage the drive mechanism and prevent
subsequent electrical gear retraction. The landing gear
cannot be retracted manually.
11. NOSE GEAR RETRACT CHAIN (Mechanical 32-30-00
Gear)
a) CHECK FOR PROPER CHAIN TENSION
b) CHECK NOSE GEAR AND NOSE GEAR
LINKAGE CLEARANCE FROM ELECTRICAL
WIRES AND OBSTRUCTIONS
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
12. PLACARDS – CHECK THAT ALL PLACARDS 11-00-00
ARE IN PLACE AND ARE LEGIBLE
13. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION – INSPECT AC.43.13-
ALL LANDING GEAR COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE, STRUCTURE
AND HYDRAULIC LINES FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION N/A
NOTE:
The following Operational Inspection procedures are to
be applied during start and run of the engine. Refer to
the Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook and
SCAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual for the engine
start and run procedures.
1. FIREWALL SHUTOFF FUEL VALVES - CHECK Ref: NOTE
FOR PROPER OPERATION
2. CROSSFEED FUEL VALVE – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
3. STANDBY PUMPS – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATIONS
4. STARTER GENERATOR Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK STARTER FOR OPERATION
b) CHECK GENERATOR FOR OUTPUT
5. IGNITION Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
b) CHECK FOR ANNUNCIATOR PANEL LIGHT
ILLUMINATION
6. ENGINE OIL – CHECK FOR PROPER PRESSURE Ref: NOTE
AND TEMPERATURE LIMITS
7. FUEL QUANTITY GAGES – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
8. INTERSTAGE TURBINE TEMPERATURE – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR CORRECT LIMITS ON ENGINE
START
9. VACUUM SYSTEM – CHECK FOR CORRECT Ref: NOTE
LIMITS
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
10. PNEUMATIC PRESSURE GAGE – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
CORRECT PRESSURE
11. PNEUMATIC SYSTEM SHUTOFF VALVES – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
12. GYRO INSTRUMENTS – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
ERRATIC OR NOISY OPERATION
13. PROPELLERS – PERFORM FLIGHT IDLE Ref: NOTE
TOQUE CHECK
14. AUTOFEATHERING CHECK – Refer to: 61-21-00
AUTOFEATHERING SYSTEM OPERATIONAL
CHECK
15. PROPELLER SYNCHROPASER – Refer to: 61-21-00
AUTOFEATHER SYSTEM OPERATIONAL
CHECK
16. PROPELLER GOVERNOR – CHECK Ref: NOTE
GOVERNOR OPERATION ( Including feathering
And reversing)
17. IDLE RPM – CHECK FOR CORRECT RPM Ref: NOTE
( both high and low rpm)
18 AC INVERTERS – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
19. RUDDER BOOST – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
20. AUTO-IGNITION Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
b) CHECK FOR ANNUNCIATOR PANEL
ILLUMINATION
21. PROPELLER DEICER – CHECK FOR PROPER N/A
OPERATION AND CYCLING. Refer to chapter
30 of the Beech King Air Series Component
Maintenance Manual
22. ENGINE INTERIAL ANTI-ICER – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION AND RIGGING
23. SURFACE DEICE SYSTEM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION AND CYCLING
24. BRAKE DEICE SYSTEM (if installed) – CHECK Ref: NOTE
FOR PROPER OPERATION WITH ENGINES
RUNNING
25. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM – PERFORM Ref: NOTE
FUNCTIONAL CHECKS
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
26. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION IN:
a) MANUAL HEAT MODE
b) MANUAL COOL MODE
c) AUTOMATIC MODE
27. REFRIGERANT LEVEL – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER LEVEL
28. AUTOPILOT – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION AS OUTLINED BY THE
APPLICABLE Beech Super King Air 200 and
B200 Pilots Operating Handbook or SCAA
Approved Airplane Flight Manual Supplement
29. STALL WARNING – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
30. ENGINE FIRE DETECTORS – Perform system test N/A
according to instructions found in the Sample Aircraft
Pilots Operating Handbook and SCAA Approved
Airplane Flight Manual
31. ENGINE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS – Perform N/A
system test according to instructions found in the
Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook and SCAA
Approved Airplane Flight Manual
32. PRESSURIZATION SYSTEM – CHECK FOR N/A
PROPER OPERATION
Refer to the Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook
and SCAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual and
perform system test
33. AUXILIARY FUEL TRANSFER JET PUMPS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
34. CONDITION LEVER – CHECK FOR CLEAN Ref: NOTE
SHUTDOWN AT IDLE-CUT-OFF
35. PITOT TUBE – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
HEATING AT THE UNIT AND FOR
OBSTRUCTIONS
36. LANDING AND TAXI LIGHTS – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
37. OUTBOARD WING LIGHTS ( R/H AND L/H) Ref: NOTE
- CHECK OPERATION OF ALL NAVIGATION
AND STROBE LIGHTS
38. COCKPIT LIGHTS – CHECK OPERATION OF Ref: NOTE
ALL COCKPIT LIGHTS
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
39. EFIS COOLING BLOWERS (if installed) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK OPERATION
40. ELECTRIC ELEVATOR TRIM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
41. ENGINE AND PROPELLER CONTROLS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
FULL TRAVEL AND FRICTION-LOCK
OPERATION
42. STATIC SYSTEM – INSPECT ALTERNATE AIR Ref: NOTE
VALVE FOR OPERATION
43. WINDSHIELD – PERFORM HEATED Ref: NOTE
OPERATIONAL CHECK
44. THRESHOLD LIGHT – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
45. AUXILIARY ELECTRIC HEAT (if installed) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION OF THE
ELECTRIC HEAT SYSTEM
46. CABIN AND COMPARTMENT LIGHTS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
47. PILOTS AN COPILOTS SEATS, SEATS BELTS- Ref: NOTE
AND SHOULDER HARNESSES – CHECK SEAT
ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM, SEAT BELTS
AND SHOULDER HARNESS INERTIA REEL
FOR OPERATION
48. CABIN SEATS, SEAT BELTS AND SHOULDER Ref: NOTE
HARNESSES – CHECK SEAT ADJUSTMENT
MECHANISM, SEAT BELTS AND SHOULDER
HARNESS INERTIA REEL FOR OPERATION
49. CABIN ENTRANCE DOOR: Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK THAT FOLDING STEPS DO NOT FOLD
TOO SOON AND THAT THEY FOLD PROPERLY
WITHOUT INTERFERENCE
b) CHECK CABIN DOOR UNLOCK
ANNUNCIATOR FOR PROPER OPERATION
c) INSPECT CABIN DOOR DAMPER FOR
LEAKAGE AND PROPER OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
50. EMERGENCY EXIT Ref: NOTE
( WITH DOOR INSTALLED )
a) CHECK EMERGENCY RELEASE HANDLES
(inside and outside) AND LATCH MECHANISM
FOR OPERATION
b) CHECK THAT LATCHES OPEN AND CLOSE
FREELY
51. EMPENNAGE CONTROL SURFACES Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
b) CHECK OPTIONAL TRIM ACTUATORS
AND MOTORS FOR SMOOTHNESS OF
OPERATION
52. REAR FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE LIGHTS Ref: NOTE
- CHECK OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
53. AILERON (LH AND RH) – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
54. AILERON TRIM TAB – CHECK TRIM TAB Ref: NOTE
ACTUATOR FOR SMOOTHNESS OF
OPERATION AND ATTACHMENT
55. FUEL TANK HEATED VENTS (LH AND RH) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK THE OPERATION OF THE HEATED
VENTS. THEY SHOULD BE WARM TO THE
TOUCH
56. STALL WARNING HEAT – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
57. FLAPS AND ACTUATORS ( Inboard, Outboard, Ref: NOTE
LH and RH) – CHECK FLAPS FOR NOISY
OR ERRATIC OPERATION
58. WING CENTER SECTION LIGHTS – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
59. ENGINE INDUCTION SYSTEM (LH AND RH)- Ref: NOTE
CHECK THE INERTIAL VANE AND BYPASS
DOOR FOR MOVEMENT WITH THE MAIN
AND STANDBY ACTUATOR MOTORS.
60. EXTERNAL POWER RELAY – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
R. POST INSPECTIONS ITEMS CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
1. AIRPLANE CLEANED AND SERVICED AS 12-20-00
REQUIRED
2. LUBRICATE AS NECESSARY 12-20-00
3. ENGINE INSPECTED AFTER GROUND RUN-UP
OR FLIGHT TEST – CHECK FOR OIL LEAKS,
SECURITY AND ATTACHMENT OF ALL
COMPONENTS
4. AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES AND
SERVICE BULLETINS – MUST BE REVIEWED
AND COMPLIED WITH AS REQUIRED
5. ADDITIONAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS-
ENSURE THAT SPECIAL INSPECTION
REQUIREMENTS ARE COMPLIED WITH AT
THE APPROPRIATE INTERVALS
6. IN-FLIGHT WORKSHEETS – ALL
DISCREPANCIES NOTED BY THE PILOT
MUST BE CHECKED AND CORRECTED AS
REQUIRED
7. EMERGENCY LOCATOR TRANSMITTER – 25-60-00
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION AND
ENSURE ELT IS ARMED BEFORE RETURNING
AIRPLANE TO SERVICE
8. OXYGEN SYSTEM PRESSURE – CHECK FOR 12-10-00
PROPER PRESSURE
9. EMERGENCY AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT-
ENSURE ALL NECESSARY EMERGENCY
AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED
IN THE AIRPLANE AND IS SERVICEABLE
10. PLACARDS – DETERMINE THAT ALL 11-20-00
REQUIRED PLACARDS ARE IN PLACE AND POH
LEGIBLE
11. LOGBOOK ENTRY – ENSURE THAT LOG MME
BOOKS ARE FILLED OUT PROPERLY
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
CAUTION:
DO NOT MIX different brands of grease as this will cause decreased bearing life. If the grease
is changed, make certain that all the affected components are thoroughly cleaned before
relubrication.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
WARNING:
Remove the lubrication fitting opposite the one being serviced. Failure to do so could result in
damage to the propeller bearings and seals.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 2 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
Certifies that the work specified except as otherwise specified was carried out in accordance with
PART – 145.50, and in respect to that work the aircraft is considered ready for release to service.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
12-20-00
1. VACCUM REGULATOR VALVE FILTER – 37-00-00
INSPECT FOR BLOCKAGE
C. NOSE LANDING GEAR AREA AC.43.13.1B/2
1. ELECTRICAL WIRING and EQUIPMENT – A
INSPECT ALL EXPOSED ELECTRICAL WIRING
AND EQUIPMENT FOR CHAFING, DAMAGE
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
D. NOSE GEAR 32-40-00
1. WHEEL CMM
a) INSPECT WHEEL FOR WEAR, DAMAGE and
CORROSION
b) INSPECT WHEEL BEARINGS and RACES for
WEAR, PITTING, CRACKS ,DISCOLORATION,
RUST or other indications of damage.
2. TIRE 12-20-00
a) INSPECT FOR WEAR AND DETEIORATION CMM
b) CHECK FOR CORRECT INFLATION
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
21-50-00
1. RETURN AIR INLET FILTERS – INSPECT
FILTERS IN RETURN AIR INLET OF THE
FORWARD VENT BLOWER
2. WINDSHIELD 56-10-00
a) INSPECT WINDSHIELD FOR CRACKS AND
VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT
b) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER SEAL
(Silicone) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS OR
WEAR
c) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER HUMP
SEAL (Polysulfide) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS
OR WEAR
d) INSPECT WINDSHIELD ATTACHMENT
SCREWS FOR 20-INCH-POUNDS TORQUE
3. WINDOWS – INSPECT EXTERIOR SURFACE OF 56-15-00
COCKPIT SIDE WINDOWS FOR DEEP
SCRATCHES, CRACKS, CHIPS OR EXCESS
CRAZING OR OTHER DAMAGE
4. ALTERNATE AIR VALVE – DRAIN OFF ALL 34-00-00
MOISTURE
5. SEAT TRACKS – INSPECT SEAT TRACKS FOR 25-10-00
DAMAGE AND WEAR
6. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER – INSPECT 26
THE BOTTLE FOR SIGNS OF DAMAGE AND CMM
MOUNT FOR SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
7. SEATS, SEAT BELTS AND SHOULDER 25-10-00
HARNESSES – INSPECT SEATS, SEAT BELTS
AND SHOULDER HARNESSES FOR
DETERIORATION
8. BRAKE FLUID RESERVOIR PRESSURE 32-40-00
EQUALIZATION ORIFICE – INSPECT FOR
BLOCKAGE
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
J. LEFT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA, CERTIFYING STAFF:
continue STAFF:
8. DRAG BRACE 32-10-00
a) INSPECT FOR SECURITY OF ATTACH
FITTINGS
b) INSPECT DOWNLOCK BOLTS FOR PROPER CMM
TORQUE ( finger-tight and safety-wired)
9. LEFT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA – AC.43.13-
INSPECT WHEEL AND GEAR DOOR 1B/2A
STRUCTURE, ALL COMPONENTS AND
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT. IF DAMAGE IS FOUND,
CHECK THE ADJACENT AREA
9. LEFT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA – AC.43.13-
INSPECT WHEEL AND GEAR DOOR 1B/2A
STRUCTURE, ALL COMPONENTS AND
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT. IF DAMAGE IS FOUND,
CHECK THE ADJACENT AREA
K. LEFT-HAND ENGINE 30-60-00
1. PROPELLER DEICER – INSPECT PROPELLER CMM
DEICE SYSTEM (spinner removal required)
2. P3 AIR FILTER – INSPECT THE FILTER FOR P&W
CLEANLINESS
3. FIREWALL FUEL FILTERS AND SCREENS - 28-20-00
INSPECT THE FIREWALL FILTER FOR 12-10-00
EVIDENCE OF FOREIGN MATTER,
CORROSION OR MICROBIOLOGICAL
GROWTH IN THE FUEL SYSTEM. IF ANY
MICROBIOLOGICAL GROWTH IS FOUND,
USE BIBOR JF ADDITIVE
4. PROPELLERS – INSPECT FOR DAMAGE AND 61-10-00
ATTACHMENT (spinner removal required) 61-11-00
61-12-00
5. ENGINE OIL FILTER – INSPECT FOR METAL P&W
PARTICLES
6. LEFT-HAND ENGINE – INSPECT ALL AC.43.13-
SYSTEMS, ALL COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT. CHECK ALL TUBES AND
HOSES FOR GENERAL CONDITION, LEAKS
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
L. RIGHT-HAND OUTBOARD WING CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
28-40-00
1. FUEL PROBES – INSPECT FOR LEAKS AT
POINTS OF ATTACHMENT
2. WING ATTACH FITTING DRAIN HOLES - 57-00-00
DETERMINE THAT THE DRAIN HOLES ARE
OPEN IN THE WING CENTER SECTION AND
OUTBOARD WING UPPER ATTACHMENT
FITTINGS
3. LIGHTS 33-40-00
a) INSPECT THE NAVIGATION AND
RECOGNITION LIGHTS FOR BROKEN OR
CRACKED LENSES
b) INSPECT THE STROBE LIGHT FOR BROKEN
OR CRACKED LENSES
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
M. RIGHT-HAND WING CENTER SECTION CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
28-40-00
1. FUEL PROBES – INSPECT FOR LEAKS AT
POINTS OF ATTACHMENT
2. FUEL TANKS AND VENTS 28-10-00
a) INSPECT THE EXTERIOR OF THE CENTER
SECTION FOR LEAKS
b) INSPECT FUEL CAP AND ANTISIPHON VALVE CMM
FOR DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
c) INSPECT THE EXTERIOR OPENINGS OF THE 28-10-00
VENTS FOR OBSTRUCTIONS
3. ACCESS DOORS (INSPECTION PANELS) - 6-50-00
INSPECT FOR FIT AND ATTACHMENT
4. BATTERY 12-20-00
a) SERVICE BATTERY AS REQUIRED
b) REMOVE BATTERY AND INSPECT THE 24-31-00
BATTERY BOX, CABLES AND VENT TUBES
FOR DETERIORATION OR OBSTRUCTIONS
5. ENGINE FIRE EXTINGHUISER 26-20-00
a) INSPECT PLUMBING FOR SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
b) CHECK FIRE BOTTLE PRESSURE GAUGE
6. FUEL PUMPS – INSPECT THE PUMPS FOR 28-20-00
LEAKS AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
N. RIGHT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA N/A
1. WHEELS
a) INSPECT WHEELS FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND
CORROSION
b) INSPECT WHEEL BEARINGS AND RACES FOR CMM
WEAR, PITTING, CRACKS, DISCOLORATION,
RUST OR OTHER INDICATIONS OF DAMAGE
2. BRAKES – INSPECT BRAKE DISCS, LININGS 32-40-00
AND PLUMBING FOR WEAR DAMAGE, CMM
LEAKS, CORROSION AND SECURITY OF ALL
COMPONENTS
3. BRAKE DEICING ( if installed) 30-21-00
a) INSPECT MANIFOLD FOR BLOCKED
ORIFICES
b) INSPECT EXTERIOR OF LINES, HOSES AND
CONNECTIONS FOR LEAKAGE AND
ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
N. RIGHT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA, CERTIFYING STAFF:
continue STAFF:
4. TIRES – INSPECT TIRES FOR WEAR, 12-20-00
DETERIORATION AND CORRECT INFLATION CMM
5. RIGHT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR STRUT – 12-20-00
CHECK STRUT FOR LEAKS AND PROPER
EXTENSION
6. ELECTRICAL WIRING AND EQUIPMENT – AC.43.13-
INSPECT EXPOSED WIRING AND EQUIPMENT 1B/2A
FOR CHAFING, DAMAGE AND PROPER
ROUTING AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
7. MAIN GEAR ACTUATOR 32-30-00
a) ACTUATOR (Mechanical Gear)
1. INSPECT ACTUATOR SUPPORT BRACKETS
FOR VISIBLE DAMAGE, WEAR AND LOOSE
AND MISSING FASTENERS
2. INSPECT ACTUATOR FOR LEAKAGE OF
INTERNAL LUBRICANT
8. DRAG BRACE 32-10-00
a) INSPECT FOR SECURITY OF ATTACH
FITTINGS
b) INSPECT DOWNLOCK BOLTS FOR PROPER CMM
TORQUE ( finger-tight and safety-wired)
9. RIGHT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA – AC.43.13-
INSPECT WHEEL AND GEAR DOOR 1B/2A
STRUCTURE, ALL COMPONENTS AND
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT. IF DAMAGE IS FOUND,
CHECK THE ADJACENT AREA
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
30-60-00
1. PROPELLER DEICER – INSPECT PROPELLER CMM
DEICE SYSTEM (spinner removal required)
2. P3 AIR FILTER – INSPECT THE FILTER FOR P&W
CLEANLINESS
3. FIREWALL FUEL FILTERS AND SCREENS - 28-20-00
INSPECT THE FIREWALL FILTER FOR 12-10-00
EVIDENCE OF FOREIGN MATTER,
CORROSION OR MICROBIOLOGICAL
GROWTH IN THE FUEL SYSTEM. IF ANY
MICROBIOLOGICAL GROWTH IS FOUND,
USE BIBOR JF ADDITIVE
4. PROPELLERS – INSPECT FOR DAMAGE AND 61-10-00
ATTACHMENT (spinner removal required) 61-11-00
61-12-00
5. ENGINE OIL FILTER – INSPECT FOR METAL P&W
PARTICLES
6. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE – INSPECT ALL AC.43.13-
SYSTEMS, ALL COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT. CHECK ALL TUBES AND
HOSES FOR GENERAL CONDITION, LEAKS
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION N/A
NOTE:
Mechanical and Hydraulic Landing Gear Systems –
Since battery voltage is not sufficient to properly cycle
The landing gear, use only an external power source
Capable of delivering and maintaining 28.25 +/- 0.25
Volts throughout the extension and retraction cycles
when performing the landing gear retraction inspection
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
1. RETRACT MECHANISM – CHECK 32
RETRACTION SYSTEM FOR PROPER
OPERATION OF ALL COMPONENTS
THROUGH AT LEAST TWO COMPLETE
CYCLES
2. DOORS AND LINKAGE 32
a) CHECK DOOR FOR DAMAGE, OPERATION
AND FIT
b) CHECK DOOR LINKAGE FOR WEAR, DAMAGE
AND RIGGING
3. DOWNLOCK INDICATOR SWITCHES 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR SECURITY AND PROPER
OPERATION OF SWITCHES
b) CLEAN TERMINALS AND CONNECTORS AS
REQUIRED
c) CHECK WIRING FOR DAMAGE AND
SECURITY OF CONNECTION
4. UPLOCK INDICATOR SWITCHES 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR SECURITY AND PROPER
OPERATION OF SWITCHES
b) CLEAN TERMINALS AND CONNECTORS
AS REQUIRED
c) CHECK WIRING FOR DAMAGE AND
SECURITY OF CONNECTION
5. WARNING HORN – CHECK OPERATION 32-60-00
6. MAIN GEAR DOWNLOCKS – CHECK LOCKING 32
MECHANISM FOR POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT
IN EXTENDED POSITION
7. SAFETY SWITCH – CHECK FOR PROPER 32-60-00
OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
8. ACTUATORS – CHECK FOR NOISE, BINDING 32-30-00
AND PROPER RIGGING 32-31-00
9. LIMIT SWITCHES – (Mechanical Gear) 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR CORRECT ADJUSTMENT
b) CHECK FOR SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
10. EMERGENCY EXTENSION (Mechanical Gear) 32-30-00
CHECK SYSTEM FOR FREEDOM OF
OPERATION AND POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT
OF DOWNLOCKS.
CAUTION:
Do not continue operation after receiving a gear-down
indication on all gears. Further movement of the handle
could damage the drive mechanism and prevent
subsequent electrical gear retraction. The landing gear
cannot be retracted manually.
11. NOSE GEAR RETRACT CHAIN (Mechanical 32-30-00
Gear)
a) CHECK FOR PROPER CHAIN TENSION
b) CHECK NOSE GEAR AND NOSE GEAR
LINKAGE CLEARANCE FROM ELECTRICAL
WIRES AND OBSTRUCTIONS
12. PLACARDS – CHECK THAT ALL PLACARDS 11-00-00
ARE IN PLACE AND ARE LEGIBLE
13. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION – INSPECT AC.43.13-
ALL LANDING GEAR COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE, STRUCTURE
AND HYDRAULIC LINES FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
N/A
NOTE:
The following Operational Inspection procedures are to
be applied during start and run of the engine. Refer to
the Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook and
SCAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual for the engine
start and run procedures.
1. FIREWALL SHUTOFF FUEL VALVES - CHECK Ref: NOTE
FOR PROPER OPERATION
2. CROSSFEED FUEL VALVE – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
3. STANDBY PUMPS – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATIONS
4. STARTER GENERATOR Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK STARTER FOR OPERATION
b) CHECK GENERATOR FOR OUTPUT
5. IGNITION Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
b) CHECK FOR ANNUNCIATOR PANEL LIGHT
ILLUMINATION
6. ENGINE OIL – CHECK FOR PROPER PRESSURE Ref: NOTE
AND TEMPERATURE LIMITS
7. FUEL QUANTITY GAGES – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
8. INTERSTAGE TURBINE TEMPERATURE – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR CORRECT LIMITS ON ENGINE
START
9. VACUUM SYSTEM – CHECK FOR CORRECT Ref: NOTE
LIMITS
10. PNEUMATIC PRESSURE GAGE – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
CORRECT PRESSURE
11. PNEUMATIC SYSTEM SHUTOFF VALVES – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
12. GYRO INSTRUMENTS – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
ERRATIC OR NOISY OPERATION
13. PROPELLERS – PERFORM FLIGHT IDLE Ref: NOTE
TOQUE CHECK
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
14. AUTOFEATHERING CHECK – Refer to: 61-21-00
AUTOFEATHERING SYSTEM OPERATIONAL
CHECK
15. PROPELLER SYNCHROPASER – Refer to: 61-21-00
AUTOFEATHER SYSTEM OPERATIONAL
CHECK
16. PROPELLER GOVERNOR – CHECK Ref: NOTE
GOVERNOR OPERATION ( Including feathering
And reversing)
17. IDLE RPM – CHECK FOR CORRECT RPM Ref: NOTE
( both high and low rpm)
18 AC INVERTERS – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
19. RUDDER BOOST – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
20. AUTO-IGNITION Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
b) CHECK FOR ANNUNCIATOR PANEL
ILLUMINATION
21. PROPELLER DEICER – CHECK FOR PROPER N/A
OPERATION AND CYCLING. Refer to chapter
30 of the Beech King Air Series Component
Maintenance Manual
22. ENGINE INTERIAL ANTI-ICER – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION AND RIGGING
23. SURFACE DEICE SYSTEM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION AND CYCLING
24. BRAKE DEICE SYSTEM (if installed) – CHECK Ref: NOTE
FOR PROPER OPERATION WITH ENGINES
RUNNING
25. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM – PERFORM Ref: NOTE
FUNCTIONAL CHECKS
26. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION IN:
a) MANUAL HEAT MODE
b) MANUAL COOL MODE
c) AUTOMATIC MODE
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
28. AUTOPILOT – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION AS OUTLINED BY THE
APPLICABLE Beech Super King Air 200 and
B200 Pilots Operating Handbook or SCAA
Approved Airplane Flight Manual Supplement
29. STALL WARNING – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
30. ENGINE FIRE DETECTORS – Perform system test N/A
according to instructions found in the Sample Aircraft
Pilots Operating Handbook and SCAA Approved
Airplane Flight Manual
31. ENGINE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS – Perform N/A
system test according to instructions found in the
Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook and SCAA
Approved Airplane Flight Manual
32. PRESSURIZATION SYSTEM – CHECK FOR N/A
PROPER OPERATION
Refer to the Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook
and SCAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual and
perform system test
33. AUXILIARY FUEL TRANSFER JET PUMPS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
34. CONDITION LEVER – CHECK FOR CLEAN Ref: NOTE
SHUTDOWN AT IDLE-CUT-OFF
35. PITOT TUBE – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
HEATING AT THE UNIT AND FOR
OBSTRUCTIONS
36. LANDING AND TAXI LIGHTS – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
37. OUTBOARD WING LIGHTS ( R/H AND L/H) Ref: NOTE
- CHECK OPERATION OF ALL NAVIGATION
AND STROBE LIGHTS
38. COCKPIT LIGHTS – CHECK OPERATION OF Ref: NOTE
ALL COCKPIT LIGHTS
39. EFIS COOLING BLOWERS (if installed) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK OPERATION
40. ELECTRIC ELEVATOR TRIM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
41. ENGINE AND PROPELLER CONTROLS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
FULL TRAVEL AND FRICTION-LOCK
OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
42. STATIC SYSTEM – INSPECT ALTERNATE AIR Ref: NOTE
VALVE FOR OPERATION
43. WINDSHIELD – PERFORM HEATED Ref: NOTE
OPERATIONAL CHECK
44. THRESHOLD LIGHT – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
45. AUXILIARY ELECTRIC HEAT (if installed) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION OF THE
ELECTRIC HEAT SYSTEM
46. CABIN AND COMPARTMENT LIGHTS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
47. PILOTS AN COPILOTS SEATS, SEATS BELTS- Ref: NOTE
AND SHOULDER HARNESSES – CHECK SEAT
ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM, SEAT BELTS
AND SHOULDER HARNESS INERTIA REEL
FOR OPERATION
48. CABIN SEATS, SEAT BELTS AND SHOULDER Ref: NOTE
HARNESSES – CHECK SEAT ADJUSTMENT
MECHANISM, SEAT BELTS AND SHOULDER
HARNESS INERTIA REEL FOR OPERATION
49. CABIN ENTRANCE DOOR: Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK THAT FOLDING STEPS DO NOT FOLD
TOO SOON AND THAT THEY FOLD PROPERLY
WITHOUT INTERFERENCE
b) CHECK CABIN DOOR UNLOCK
ANNUNCIATOR FOR PROPER OPERATION
c) INSPECT CABIN DOOR DAMPER FOR
LEAKAGE AND PROPER OPERATION
50. EMERGENCY EXIT Ref: NOTE
( WITH DOOR INSTALLED )
a) CHECK EMERGENCY RELEASE HANDLES
(inside and outside) AND LATCH MECHANISM
FOR OPERATION
b) CHECK THAT LATCHES OPEN AND CLOSE
FREELY
51. EMPENNAGE CONTROL SURFACES Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
b) CHECK OPTIONAL TRIM ACTUATORS
AND MOTORS FOR SMOOTHNESS OF
OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
52. REAR FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE LIGHTS Ref: NOTE
- CHECK OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
53. AILERON (LH AND RH) – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
54. AILERON TRIM TAB – CHECK TRIM TAB Ref: NOTE
ACTUATOR FOR SMOOTHNESS OF
OPERATION AND ATTACHMENT
55. FUEL TANK HEATED VENTS (LH AND RH) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK THE OPERATION OF THE HEATED
VENTS. THEY SHOULD BE WARM TO THE
TOUCH
56. STALL WARNING HEAT – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
57. FLAPS AND ACTUATORS ( Inboard, Outboard, Ref: NOTE
LH and RH) – CHECK FLAPS FOR NOISY
OR ERRATIC OPERATION
58. WING CENTER SECTION LIGHTS – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
59. ENGINE INDUCTION SYSTEM (LH AND RH)- Ref: NOTE
CHECK THE INERTIAL VANE AND BYPASS
DOOR FOR MOVEMENT WITH THE MAIN
AND STANDBY ACTUATOR MOTORS.
60. EXTERNAL POWER RELAY – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
R. POST INSPECTIONS ITEMS 12-20-00
1. AIRPLANE CLEANED AND SERVICED AS
REQUIRED
2. LUBRICATE AS NECESSARY 12-20-00
3. ENGINE INSPECTED AFTER GROUND RUN-UP
OR FLIGHT TEST – CHECK FOR OIL LEAKS,
SECURITY AND ATTACHMENT OF ALL
COMPONENTS
4. AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES AND
SERVICE BULLETINS – MUST BE REVIEWED
AND COMPLIED WITH AS REQUIRED
5. ADDITIONAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS-
ENSURE THAT SPECIAL INSPECTION
REQUIREMENTS ARE COMPLIED WITH AT
THE APPROPRIATE INTERVALS
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
R. POST INSPECTIONS ITEMS, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
6. IN-FLIGHT WORKSHEETS – ALL
DISCREPANCIES NOTED BY THE PILOT
MUST BE CHECKED AND CORRECTED AS
REQUIRED
7. EMERGENCY LOCATOR TRANSMITTER – 25-60-00
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION AND
ENSURE ELT IS ARMED BEFORE RETURNING
AIRPLANE TO SERVICE
8. OXYGEN SYSTEM PRESSURE – CHECK FOR 12-10-00
PROPER PRESSURE
9. EMERGENCY AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT-
ENSURE ALL NECESSARY EMERGENCY
AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED
IN THE AIRPLANE AND IS SERVICEABLE
10. PLACARDS – DETERMINE THAT ALL 11-20-00
REQUIRED PLACARDS ARE IN PLACE AND POH
LEGIBLE
11. LOGBOOK ENTRY – ENSURE THAT LOG MME
BOOKS ARE FILLED OUT PROPERLY
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
CAUTION:
DO NOT MIX different brands of grease as this will cause decreased bearing life. If the grease
is changed, make certain that all the affected components are thoroughly cleaned before
relubrication.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
WARNING:
Remove the lubrication fitting opposite the one being serviced. Failure to do so could result in
damage to the propeller bearings and seals.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 3 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
Certifies that the work specified except as otherwise specified was carried out in accordance with
PART – 145.50, and in respect to that work the aircraft is considered ready for release to service.
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
A. NOSE SECTION CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
1. NOSE SECTION – INSPECT SKIN, STRUCTURE N/A
AND ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR WEAR,
DAMAGE AND CORROSION. IF DAMAGE
OR CORROSION IS FOUND IN A GIVEN AREA
CHECK THE ADJACENT AREA
2. RADOME – INSPECT THE EXTERIOR SURFACE N/A
FOR CRACKS IN THE PAINT AND
FIBERGLASS SUBSTRATE
B. NOSE AVIONICS COMPARTMENT 12-20-00
1. VACCUM REGULATOR VALVE FILTER – 37-00-00
INSPECT FOR BLOCKAGE
2. INSTRUMENT AIR FILTER – INSPECT FOR 12-20-00
CLEANLINESS 37-00-00
3. AVIONICS EQUIPMENT AND RACKS - N/A
INSPECT FOR SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
4. AVIONICS COMPARTMENT AREA - INSPECT N/A
FOR CORROSION, TRAPPED WATER AND
INDICATIONS OF WATER LEAKAGE
5. ELECTRICAL WIRING AND EQUIPMENT – AC.43.13-
INSPECT FOR CHAFING, DAMAGE, PROPER 1B/2A
ROUTING OF WIRE BUNDLES AND SECURITY
OF ATTACHMENT
6. DOORS, FASTENERS AND SEAL – INSPECT N/A
SEAL FOR DETERIORATION AND DOORS
AND LATCHES FOR PROPER ADJUSTMENT
AND FIT
7. NOSE AVIONICS COMPARTMENT – INSPECT AC.43.13-
SKIN, STRUCTURE, ALL COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
C. NOSE LANDING GEAR AREA AC.43.13.1B/2
1. ELECTRICAL WIRING and EQUIPMENT – A
INSPECT ALL EXPOSED ELECTRICAL WIRING
AND EQUIPMENT FOR CHAFING, DAMAGE
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
2. FORWARD EVAPORATOR FILTER - INSPECT 21-50-00
FORWARD EVAPORATOR FILTER
3. CONDENSER BLOWER – INSPECT FITTINGS 21-50-00
FOR DIRT, GREASE, MOISTURE AND
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
C. NOSE LANDING GEAR AREA, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
4. REFRIGERANT LINES, SERVICE VALVES AND 21-50-00
HIGH PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE – INSPECT
LINES AND VALVES FOR LEAKAGE, DAMAGE
ATTACHMENT AND SURFACE CORROSION
5. NOSE LANDING GEAR AREA – INSPECT SKIN, AC.43.13-
STRUCTURE AND ATTACHING HARDWARE 1B/2A
FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND CORROSION. IF
DAMAGE OR CORROSION IS FOUND IN A
GIVEN AREA, CHECK THE ADJACENT AREA
D. NOSE GEAR 32-40-00
1. WHEEL CMM
a) INSPECT WHEEL FOR WEAR, DAMAGE and
CORROSION
b) INSPECT WHEEL BEARINGS and RACES for
WEAR, PITTING, CRACKS ,DISCOLORATION,
RUST or other indications of damage.
2. TIRE 12-20-00
a) INSPECT FOR WEAR AND DETEIORATION CMM
b) CHECK FOR CORRECT INFLATION
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION: ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
D. NOSE GEAR, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
9. NOSE GEAR COMPONENTS – INSPECT ALL 32
COMPONENTS AND ATTACHING HARDWARE
FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND SURFACE
CORROSION
10. NOSE GEAR – INSPECT NOSE GEAR, AC.43.13-
ATTACHING STRUCTURE AND ALL 1B/2A
COMPONENTS FOR GENERAL CONDITION
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
E. PILOTS COMPARTMENT 21-50-00
1. RETURN AIR INLET FILTERS – INSPECT
FILTERS IN RETURN AIR INLET OF THE
FORWARD VENT BLOWER
2. WINDSHIELD 56-10-00
a) INSPECT WINDSHIELD FOR CRACKS AND
VISIBILITY IMPAIRMENT
b) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER SEAL
(Silicone) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS OR
WEAR
c) INSPECT WINDSHIELD WEATHER HUMP
SEAL (Polysulfide) FOR DEBONDING, CRACKS
OR WEAR
d) INSPECT WINDSHIELD ATTACHMENT
SCREWS FOR 20-INCH-POUNDS TORQUE
3. WINDOWS – INSPECT EXTERIOR SURFACE OF 56-15-00
COCKPIT SIDE WINDOWS FOR DEEP
SCRATCHES, CRACKS, CHIPS OR EXCESS
CRAZING OR OTHER DAMAGE
4. ALTERNATE AIR VALVE – DRAIN OFF ALL 34-00-00
MOISTURE
5. SEAT TRACKS – INSPECT SEAT TRACKS FOR 25-10-00
DAMAGE AND WEAR
F. CABIN SECTION 56-15-00
1. WINDOWS – INSPECT EXTERIOR SURFACES
OF WINDOWS FOR DEEP SCRATCHES,
CRACKS, CHIPS AND EXCESSIVE CRAZING
OR OTHER DAMAGE
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
F. CABIN SECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
2. ROTATING OR (FLASHING) BEACON - 33-40-00
INSPECT FOR CRACKED OR BROKEN LENSES
3. ACCESS DOORS – INSPECT FOR FIT AND N/A
ATTACHMENT
4. OUTFLOW AND SAFETY VALVES – DRAIN 12-20-00
CONTROL LINE
5. SEAT TRACKS – INSPECT SEAT TRACKS FOR 25-20-00
DAMAGE AND WEAR
6. PRESSURIZATION DUCTS – INSPECT FOR 21-20-00
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
7. FLAPPER VALVE – CHECK FOR PROPER 21-20-00
OPERATION AND EXCESSIVE AIR NOISE
G. REAR FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE 53-10-00
1. REAR FUSELAGE DRAINS – INSPECT REAR
FUSELAGE DRAINS
2. ELT - BATTERY 25-60-00
a) INSPECT FOR LEAKAGE, CORROSION OR
LOOSE LEADS
b) DETERMINE REMAINING USEFUL LIFE
3. NAVIGATION LIGHTS AND ROTATING 33-40-00
OR FLASHING BEACONS – INSPECT FOR
BROKEN OR CRACKED LENSES
4. ACCESS DOORS – INSPECT FOR FIT AND N/A
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
5. VENTRAL FIN DRAIN HOLES – INSPECT THE 53-10-00
DRAIN HOLES IN THE BOTTOM OF THE
VENTRAL FIN FOR OBSTRUCTIONS
6. DEICER BOOTS – INSPECT FOR DETERI- N/A
ORATION, DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
7. RUDDER AND TRIM TAB DRAIN HOLES – N/A
INSPECT THE DRAIN HOLES FOR
OBSTRUCTIONS
8. STATIC WICKS 23-60-00
a) INSPECT FOR DAMAGE AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
b) CHECK THE STATIC WICK FOR PROPER
BONDING TO THE AIRPLANE
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
G. REAR FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE, CERTIFYING STAFF:
continue STAFF:
9. EMPENNAGE AND CONTROL SURFACES
a) CHECK ELEVATOR TRIM TAB FREE PLAY 27-30-00
b) CHECK RUDDER TRIM TAB FREE PLAY 27-20-00
c) INSPECT ELEVATOR AND RUDDER HINGE 27-30-00
BRACKETS AND THEIR SPAR ATTACH 27-20-00
AREAS
10. CABIN PRESSURIZATION OVERBOARD N/A
DUMP SYSTEM (if installed)-INSPECT LOUVER
AND SCREEN FOR OBSTRUCTION AND
HOSES FOR SECURITY
11. ELECTRICAL WIRING AND EQUIPMENT- AC.43.13-
INSPECT FOR CHAFING, DAMAGE, PROPER 1B/2A
ROUTING OF WIRE BUNDLES AND
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
12. AVIONICS AND AUTOPILOT EQUIPMENT N/A
AND RACKS – INSPECT AVIONICS AND
AUTOPILOT EQUIPMENT AND RACKS FOR
SECURITY, CORROSION AND SIGNS OF
WATER LEAKAGE
13. VERTICAL STABILIZER – INSPECT FRONT N/A
AND REAR SPARS OF THE VERTICAL
STABILIZER FOR LOOSE OR MISSING
RIVETS OR FASTENERS
14. CONTROL CABLE SEALS – INSPECT FOR 27
DETERIORATION, SECURITY, CLEANLINESS
AND LUBRICATION
15. FLIGHT CONTROL COMPONENTS, CABLES 27
AND PULLEYS
a) INSPECT THE CONTROL SYSTEM
COMPONENTS (pushrods, turnbuckles, castings,
Etc.) FOR BULGES, SPLITS OR CRACKS WHICH
ARE CONDITIONS FOR REPLACEMENT
b) INSPECT CONTROL CABLES, PULLEYS AND
ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT FOR CRACKS,
WEAR, BREAKS, ATTACHMENT, ALIGNMENT,
CLEARANCE AND PROPER OPERATION.
REPLACE CABLES THAT HAVE MORE THAN
THREE BROKEN WIRES IN ANY GIVEN
THREE-FOOT CABLE LENGTH OR HAVE
EVIDENCE OF CORROSION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
G. REAR FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE, CERTIFYING STAFF:
continue STAFF:
16. OXYGEN SYSTEM PLUMBING – INSPECT 35-00-00
PLUMBING FOR SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
17. REAR FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE AREA- AC.43.13-
INSPECT SKIN, STRUCTURE, ALL 1B/2A
COMPONENTS AND ATTACHING
HARDWARE FOR GENERAL CONDITION
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT. IF
DAMAGE OR CORROSION IS FOUND IN A
GIVEN AREA, CHECK THE ADJACENT AREA
H. LEFT-HAND OUTBOARD WING 28-40-00
1. FUEL PROBES – INSPECT FOR LEAKS AT
POINTS OF ATTACHMENT
2. WING ATTACH FITTING DRAIN HOLES - 57-00-00
DETERMINE THAT THE DRAIN HOLES ARE
OPEN IN THE WING CENTER SECTION AND
OUTBOARD WING UPPER ATTACHMENT
FITTINGS
3. LIGHTS 33-40-00
a) INSPECT THE NAVIGATION AND
RECOGNITION LIGHTS FOR BROKEN OR
CRACKED LENSES
b) INSPECT THE STROBE LIGHT FOR BROKEN
OR CRACKED LENSES
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
H. LEFT-HAND OUTBOARD WING, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
7. ACCESS DOORS (INSPECTION PANELS) – 6-50-00
INSPECT FOR FIT AND ATTACHMENT
8. STATIC WICKS 23-60-00
a) INSPECT FOR DAMAGE AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
b) CHECK THE STATIC WICK FOR PROPER
BONDING TO THE AIRPLANE
I. LEFT HAND WING CENTER SECTION 28-40-00
1. FUEL PROBES – INSPECT FOR LEAKS AT
POINTS OF ATTACHMENT
2. FUEL TANKS AND VENTS 28-10-00
a) INSPECT THE EXTERIOR OF THE CENTER
SECTION FOR LEAKS
b) INSPECT FUEL CAP AND ANTISIPHON VALVE CMM
FOR DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
c) INSPECT THE EXTERIOR OPENINGS OF THE 28-10-00
VENTS FOR OBSTRUCTIONS
3. ACCESS DOORS (INSPECTION PANELS) - 6-50-00
INSPECT FOR FIT AND ATTACHMENT
4. ENGINE FIRE EXTINGUISHER 26-20-00
a) INSPECT PLUMBING FOR SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
b) CHECK FIRE BOTTLE PRESSURE GAUGE
J. LEFT-HAND MAIN LANDING AREA N/A
1. WHEELS
a) INSPECT WHEELS FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND
CORROSION
b) INSPECT WHEEL BEARINGS AND RACES FOR CMM
WEAR, PITTING, CRACKS, DISCOLORATION,
RUST OR OTHER INDICATIONS OF DAMAGE
2. BRAKES – INSPECT BRAKE DISCS, LININGS 32-40-00
AND PLUMBING FOR WEAR DAMAGE, CMM
LEAKS, CORROSION AND SECURITY OF ALL
COMPONENTS
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
J. LEFT-HAND MAIN LANDING AREA, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
3. BRAKE DEICING ( if installed) 30-21-00
a) INSPECT MANIFOLD FOR BLOCKED
ORIFICES
b) INSPECT EXTERIOR OF LINES, HOSES AND
CONNECTIONS FOR LEAKAGE AND
ATTACHMENT
4. TIRES – INSPECT TIRES FOR WEAR, 12-20-00
DETERIORATION AND CORRECT INFLATION CMM
5. LEFT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR STRUT – 12-20-00
CHECK STRUT FOR LEAKS AND PROPER
EXTENSION
6. ELECTRICAL WIRING AND EQUIPMENT – AC.43.13-
INSPECT EXPOSED WIRING AND EQUIPMENT 1B/2A
FOR CHAFING, DAMAGE AND PROPER
ROUTING AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
7. MAIN GEAR ACTUATOR 32-30-00
a) ACTUATOR (Mechanical Gear)
1. INSPECT ACTUATOR SUPPORT BRACKETS
FOR VISIBLE DAMAGE, WEAR AND LOOSE
AND MISSING FASTENERS
2. INSPECT ACTUATOR FOR LEAKAGE OF
INTERNAL LUBRICANT
K. LEFT-HAND ENGINE 30-60-00
1. PROPELLER DEICER – INSPECT PROPELLER CMM
DEICE SYSTEM (spinner removal required)
2. P3 AIR FILTER – INSPECT THE FILTER FOR P&W
CLEANLINESS
3. FUEL FILTERS AND SCREENS - 28-20-00
INSPECT THE FIREWALL FILTER FOR 12-10-00
EVIDENCE OF FOREIGN MATTER,
CORROSION OR MICROBIOLOGICAL
GROWTH IN THE FUEL SYSTEM. IF ANY
MICROBIOLOGICAL GROWTH IS FOUND,
USE BIBOR JF ADDITIVE
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
K. LEFT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
4. PROPELLERS 61
a) INSPECT FOR DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
(spinner removal required)
b) INSPECT THE CARBON BLOCK PIN FOR
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
c) CHECK FOR NO METAL-TO-METAL CONTACT
BETWEEN THE BRASS RING AND THE
REVERSING LEVER
d) INSPECT MECHANICAL FEEDBACK RING
STOP RODS AND SPRINGS FOR DAMAGE
e) INSPECT THE REVERSING LINKAGE FOR 76-00-00
CORRECT ADJUSTMENT, EVIDENCE OF
BINDING AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
5. HIGH PRESSURE FUEL PUMP FILTERS – P&W
INSPECT THE ENGINE-DRIVEN HIGH
PRESSURE FUEL PUMP FILTERS
6. ENGINE OIL FILTER – INSPECT FOR METAL P&W
PARTICLES
7. ENGINE-DRIVEN FUEL PUMP COUPLING P&W
SHAFT – (Sundstrand pumps only)-INSPECT FOR 73-10-02
FRETTING AND/OR CORROSION WHEN
REPLACING OUTLET FILTER
8. DRAIN PLUGS – INSPECT ALL DRAIN PLUGS 79-00-00
FOR LEAKAGE, SECURITY AND SAFETYING
9. COWLING – REMOVE ENTIRE COWLING AND 71-10-00
INSPECT SKIN, STRUCTURE AND ATTACHING
HARDWARE FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND
CORROSION
10. OIL COOLER – INSPECT OIL COOLER AND 79-00-00
PLUMBING FOR LEAKAGE, DAMAGE AND
ATTACHMENT
11. OIL PRESSURE SNUBBER (p/n: 3R1) WITH 12-10-00
POROUS TYPE ELEMENT – CLEAN
ELEMENT
12. AFT COWLING ACCESS DOOR LATCHES – 71-10-00
CHECK ADJUSTMENT OF LATCHES
13. FIRE SEALS-INSPECT FOR CONDITION 71-00-00
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
K. LEFT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
14. ENGINE EXHAUST SYSTEM P&W
a) INSPECT ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR 78-00-00
WEAR, DAMAGE AND CORROSION
b) INSPECT THE EXHAUST SYSTEM AND
VISIBLE PORTIONS OF THE POWER TURBINE
FOR BURNING, DISTORSION, DAMAGE AND
CRACKS
15. ENGINE AND PROPELLERS CONTROLS N/A
a) CHECK CONTROLS AND ASSOCIATED
EQUIPMENT FOR BINDING, STIFF OPERATION
FULL TRAVEL AND FRICTION LOCK
b) INSPECT CONTROLS, BOLTS, NUTS
COTTER PINS AND SAFETIES FOR
CORROSION, DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
NOTE:
Special attention should be made to the cam box.
c) INSPECT CONTROL CABLES FOR DAMAGE 12-20-00
SUCH AS CRIMPS, CUTS, ABRASIONS OR
TIGHT BENDS. IF EXTERIOR COVERING
IS RUPTURED, PERFORM LEAK TEST
16. CONTROL CABLE BOOTS – INSPECT THE N/A
CONTROL CABLE BOOTS FOR EXCESSIVE
COMPRESSION, TWIST, WEAR OR AGING
WHICH COULD CAUSE BINDING
17. STARTER GENERATOR – INSPECT ONE SET 24-30-00
OF BRUSHES FOR INDICATIONS OF
EXCESSIVE WEAR OR DAMAGE (determine
Wear by observing diagonal groove on brush)
18. COMPRESSOR INLET – REMOVE THE AIR P&W
INLET SCREEN AND INSPECT THE
COMPRESSOR INLET AREA, STRUTS, FIRST
STAGE BLADES AND VANES FOR DIRT
DEPOSITS, CORROSION, EROSION, CRACKS
AND DAMAGE BY FOREIGN OBJECTS. Refer
To the Engine Maintenance Manual for corrective
Action.
19. MAGNETIC CHIP DETECTOR 12-10-00
a) REMOVE AND VISUALLY INSPECT PLUG FOR
METAL PARTICLES AND DAMAGE
b) CHECK LIGHT IN ANNUNCIATOR PANEL FOR
PROPER OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
K. LEFT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
20. ENGINE P&W
a) INSPECT FUEL NOZZLES PER
MANUFACTURERS MANUAL
b) INSPECT ENGINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE INSTRUCTIONS FOUND IN THE ENGINE
MANUFACTURERS MANUAL
21. IGNITION EXCITER 74-00-00
a) INSPECT EXCITER AND ELECTRICAL
HARNESS FOR DAMAGE AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
b) INSPECT THAT SUPPLY CABLE AND
IGNITION CABLE CONNECTORS ARE
INSTALLED AND SAFETIED
22. SPARK IGNITERS PLUGS – INSPECT THE P&W
IGNITER PLUGS AS DESCRIBED IN THE
ENGINE MAINTENANCE MANUAL
23. FUEL PURGE SYSTEM/FUEL DRAIN 71-70-00
COLLECTOR SYSTEM
1. CHECK TANK, PUMP, PUMP FILTER AND
PLUMBING FOR LEAKS AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
2. PERFORM A PRESSURE TEST ON THE
COLLECTOR TANK
3. CHECK WIRING TO COLLECTOR PUMP AND
TANK FLOAT SWITCH FOR DAMAGE AND
SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
4. CHECK COLLECTOR PUMP FOR PROPER
OPERATION
24. LEFT-HAND ENGINE – INSPECT ALL AC.43.13-
SYSTEMS, ALL COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT. CHECK ALL TUBES AND
HOSES FOR GENERAL CONDITION, LEAKS
AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
L. RIGHT-HAND OUTBOARD WING CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
1. FUEL PROBES – INSPECT FOR LEAKS AT 28-40-00
POINTS OF ATTACHMENT
2. WING ATTACH FITTING DRAIN HOLES - 57-00-00
DETERMINE THAT THE DRAIN HOLES ARE
OPEN IN THE WING CENTER SECTION AND
OUTBOARD WING UPPER ATTACHMENT
FITTINGS
3. LIGHTS 33-40-00
a) INSPECT THE NAVIGATION AND
RECOGNITION LIGHTS FOR BROKEN OR
CRACKED LENSES
b) INSPECT THE STROBE LIGHT FOR BROKEN
OR CRACKED LENSES
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
M. RIGHT-HAND WING CENTER SECTION CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
28-40-00
1. FUEL PROBES – INSPECT FOR LEAKS AT
POINTS OF ATTACHMENT
2. FUEL TANKS AND VENTS 28-10-00
a) INSPECT THE EXTERIOR OF THE CENTER
SECTION FOR LEAKS
b) INSPECT FUEL CAP AND ANTISIPHON VALVE CMM
FOR DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
c) INSPECT THE EXTERIOR OPENINGS OF THE 28-10-00
VENTS FOR OBSTRUCTIONS
3. ACCESS DOORS (INSPECTION PANELS) - 6-50-00
INSPECT FOR FIT AND ATTACHMENT
4. BATTERY 12-20-00
a) SERVICE BATTERY AS REQUIRED
b) REMOVE BATTERY AND INSPECT THE 24-31-00
BATTERY BOX, CABLES AND VENT TUBES
FOR DETERIORATION OR OBSTRUCTIONS
5. ENGINE FIRE EXTINGHUISER 26-20-00
a) INSPECT PLUMBING FOR SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
b) CHECK FIRE BOTTLE PRESSURE GAUGE
N. RIGHT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA N/A
1. WHEELS
a) INSPECT WHEELS FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND
CORROSION
b) INSPECT WHEEL BEARINGS AND RACES FOR CMM
WEAR, PITTING, CRACKS, DISCOLORATION,
RUST OR OTHER INDICATIONS OF DAMAGE
2. BRAKES – INSPECT BRAKE DISCS, LININGS 32-40-00
AND PLUMBING FOR WEAR DAMAGE, CMM
LEAKS, CORROSION AND SECURITY OF ALL
COMPONENTS
3. BRAKE DEICING ( if installed) 30-21-00
a) INSPECT MANIFOLD FOR BLOCKED
ORIFICES
b) INSPECT EXTERIOR OF LINES, HOSES AND
CONNECTIONS FOR LEAKAGE AND
ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
N. RIGHT-HAND MAIN LANDING GEAR AREA, CERTIFYING STAFF:
continue STAFF:
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
4. PROPELLERS 61
a) INSPECT FOR DAMAGE AND ATTACHMENT
(spinner removal required)
b) INSPECT THE CARBON BLOCK PIN FOR
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
c) CHECK FOR NO METAL-TO-METAL CONTACT
BETWEEN THE BRASS RING AND THE
REVERSING LEVER
d) INSPECT MECHANICAL FEEDBACK RING
STOP RODS AND SPRINGS FOR DAMAGE
e) INSPECT THE REVERSING LINKAGE FOR 76-00-00
CORRECT ADJUSTMENT, EVIDENCE OF
BINDING AND SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
5. HIGH PRESSURE FUEL PUMP FILTERS – P&W
INSPECT THE ENGINE-DRIVEN HIGH
PRESSURE FUEL PUMP FILTERS
6. ENGINE OIL FILTER – INSPECT FOR METAL P&W
PARTICLES
7. ENGINE-DRIVEN FUEL PUMP COUPLING P&W
SHAFT – (Sundstrand pumps only)-INSPECT FOR 73-10-02
FRETTING AND/OR CORROSION WHEN
REPLACING OUTLET FILTER
8. DRAIN PLUGS – INSPECT ALL DRAIN PLUGS 79-00-00
FOR LEAKAGE, SECURITY AND SAFETYING
9. COWLING – REMOVE ENTIRE COWLING AND 71-10-00
INSPECT SKIN, STRUCTURE AND ATTACHING
HARDWARE FOR WEAR, DAMAGE AND
CORROSION
10. OIL COOLER – INSPECT OIL COOLER AND 79-00-00
PLUMBING FOR LEAKAGE, DAMAGE AND
ATTACHMENT
11. OIL PRESSURE SNUBBER (p/n: 3R1) WITH 12-10-00
POROUS TYPE ELEMENT – CLEAN
ELEMENT
12. AFT COWLING ACCESS DOOR LATCHES – 71-10-00
CHECK ADJUSTMENT OF LATCHES
13. FIRE SEALS-INSPECT FOR CONDITION 71-00-00
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
O. RIGHT-HAND ENGINE, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
NOTE:
Mechanical and Hydraulic Landing Gear Systems –
Since battery voltage is not sufficient to properly cycle
The landing gear, use only an external power source
Capable of delivering and maintaining 28.25 +/- 0.25
Volts throughout the extension and retraction cycles
when performing the landing gear retraction inspection.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
1. RETRACT MECHANISM – CHECK 32
RETRACTION SYSTEM FOR PROPER
OPERATION OF ALL COMPONENTS
THROUGH AT LEAST TWO COMPLETE
CYCLES
2. DOORS AND LINKAGE 32
a) CHECK DOOR FOR DAMAGE, OPERATION
AND FIT
b) CHECK DOOR LINKAGE FOR WEAR, DAMAGE
AND RIGGING
3. DOWNLOCK INDICATOR SWITCHES 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR SECURITY AND PROPER
OPERATION OF SWITCHES
b) CLEAN TERMINALS AND CONNECTORS AS
REQUIRED
c) CHECK WIRING FOR DAMAGE AND
SECURITY OF CONNECTION
4. UPLOCK INDICATOR SWITCHES 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR SECURITY AND PROPER
OPERATION OF SWITCHES
b) CLEAN TERMINALS AND CONNECTORS
AS REQUIRED
c) CHECK WIRING FOR DAMAGE AND
SECURITY OF CONNECTION
5. WARNING HORN – CHECK OPERATION 32-60-00
6. MAIN GEAR DOWNLOCKS – CHECK LOCKING 32
MECHANISM FOR POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT
IN EXTENDED POSITION
7. SAFETY SWITCH – CHECK FOR PROPER 32-60-00
OPERATION
8. ACTUATORS – CHECK FOR NOISE, BINDING 32-30-00
AND PROPER RIGGING 32-31-00
9. LIMIT SWITCHES – (Mechanical Gear) 32-60-00
a) CHECK FOR CORRECT ADJUSTMENT
b) CHECK FOR SECURITY OF ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
P. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
10. EMERGENCY EXTENSION (Mechanical Gear) 32-30-00
CHECK SYSTEM FOR FREEDOM OF
OPERATION AND POSITIVE ENGAGEMENT
OF DOWNLOCKS.
CAUTION:
Do not continue operation after receiving a gear-down
indication on all gears. Further movement of the handle
could damage the drive mechanism and prevent
subsequent electrical gear retraction. The landing gear
cannot be retracted manually.
11. NOSE GEAR RETRACT CHAIN (Mechanical 32-30-00
Gear)
a) CHECK FOR PROPER CHAIN TENSION
b) CHECK NOSE GEAR AND NOSE GEAR
LINKAGE CLEARANCE FROM ELECTRICAL
WIRES AND OBSTRUCTIONS
12. PLACARDS – CHECK THAT ALL PLACARDS 11-00-00
ARE IN PLACE AND ARE LEGIBLE
13. LANDING GEAR RETRACTION – INSPECT AC.43.13-
ALL LANDING GEAR COMPONENTS AND 1B/2A
ATTACHING HARDWARE, STRUCTURE
AND HYDRAULIC LINES FOR GENERAL
CONDITION AND SECURITY OF
ATTACHMENT
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
N/A
NOTE:
The following Operational Inspection procedures are to
be applied during start and run of the engine. Refer to
the Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook and
SCAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual for the engine
start and run procedures.
1. FIREWALL SHUTOFF FUEL VALVES - CHECK Ref: NOTE
FOR PROPER OPERATION
2. CROSSFEED FUEL VALVE – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
3. STANDBY PUMPS – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATIONS
4. STARTER GENERATOR Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK STARTER FOR OPERATION
b) CHECK GENERATOR FOR OUTPUT
5. IGNITION Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
b) CHECK FOR ANNUNCIATOR PANEL LIGHT
ILLUMINATION
6. ENGINE OIL – CHECK FOR PROPER PRESSURE Ref: NOTE
AND TEMPERATURE LIMITS
7. FUEL QUANTITY GAGES – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
8. INTERSTAGE TURBINE TEMPERATURE – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR CORRECT LIMITS ON ENGINE
START
9. VACUUM SYSTEM – CHECK FOR CORRECT Ref: NOTE
LIMITS
10. PNEUMATIC PRESSURE GAGE – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
CORRECT PRESSURE
11. PNEUMATIC SYSTEM SHUTOFF VALVES – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
12. GYRO INSTRUMENTS – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
ERRATIC OR NOISY OPERATION
13. PROPELLERS – PERFORM FLIGHT IDLE Ref: NOTE
TOQUE CHECK
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
14. AUTOFEATHERING CHECK – Refer to: 61-21-00
AUTOFEATHERING SYSTEM OPERATIONAL
CHECK
15. PROPELLER SYNCHROPASER – Refer to: 61-21-00
AUTOFEATHER SYSTEM OPERATIONAL
CHECK
16. PROPELLER GOVERNOR – CHECK Ref: NOTE
GOVERNOR OPERATION ( Including feathering
And reversing)
17. IDLE RPM – CHECK FOR CORRECT RPM Ref: NOTE
( both high and low rpm)
18 AC INVERTERS – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
19. RUDDER BOOST – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
20. AUTO-IGNITION Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
b) CHECK FOR ANNUNCIATOR PANEL
ILLUMINATION
21. PROPELLER DEICER – CHECK FOR PROPER N/A
OPERATION AND CYCLING. Refer to chapter
30 of the Beech King Air Series Component
Maintenance Manual
22. ENGINE INTERIAL ANTI-ICER – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION AND RIGGING
23. SURFACE DEICE SYSTEM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION AND CYCLING
24. BRAKE DEICE SYSTEM (if installed) – CHECK Ref: NOTE
FOR PROPER OPERATION WITH ENGINES
RUNNING
25. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM – PERFORM Ref: NOTE
FUNCTIONAL CHECKS
26. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION IN:
a) MANUAL HEAT MODE
b) MANUAL COOL MODE
c) AUTOMATIC MODE
27. REFRIGERANT LEVEL – CHECK FOR PROPER
LEVEL
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
28. AUTOPILOT – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION AS OUTLINED BY THE
APPLICABLE Beech Super King Air 200 and
B200 Pilots Operating Handbook or SCAA
Approved Airplane Flight Manual Supplement
29. STALL WARNING – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
30. ENGINE FIRE DETECTORS – Perform system test N/A
according to instructions found in the Sample Aircraft
Pilots Operating Handbook and SCAA Approved
Airplane Flight Manual
31. ENGINE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS – Perform N/A
system test according to instructions found in the
Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook and SCAA
Approved Airplane Flight Manual
32. PRESSURIZATION SYSTEM – CHECK FOR N/A
PROPER OPERATION
Refer to the Sample Aircraft Pilots Operating Handbook
and SCAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual and
perform system test
33. AUXILIARY FUEL TRANSFER JET PUMPS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
34. CONDITION LEVER – CHECK FOR CLEAN Ref: NOTE
SHUTDOWN AT IDLE-CUT-OFF
35. PITOT TUBE – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
HEATING AT THE UNIT AND FOR
OBSTRUCTIONS
36. LANDING AND TAXI LIGHTS – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
37. OUTBOARD WING LIGHTS ( R/H AND L/H) Ref: NOTE
- CHECK OPERATION OF ALL NAVIGATION
AND STROBE LIGHTS
38. COCKPIT LIGHTS – CHECK OPERATION OF Ref: NOTE
ALL COCKPIT LIGHTS
39. EFIS COOLING BLOWERS (if installed) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK OPERATION
40. ELECTRIC ELEVATOR TRIM – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
41. ENGINE AND PROPELLER CONTROLS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
FULL TRAVEL AND FRICTION-LOCK
OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
42. STATIC SYSTEM – INSPECT ALTERNATE AIR Ref: NOTE
VALVE FOR OPERATION
43. WINDSHIELD – PERFORM HEATED Ref: NOTE
OPERATIONAL CHECK
44. THRESHOLD LIGHT – CHECK FOR PROPER Ref: NOTE
OPERATION
45. AUXILIARY ELECTRIC HEAT (if installed) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION OF THE
ELECTRIC HEAT SYSTEM
46. CABIN AND COMPARTMENT LIGHTS – Ref: NOTE
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION
47. PILOTS AN COPILOTS SEATS, SEATS BELTS- Ref: NOTE
AND SHOULDER HARNESSES – CHECK SEAT
ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM, SEAT BELTS
AND SHOULDER HARNESS INERTIA REEL
FOR OPERATION
48. CABIN SEATS, SEAT BELTS AND SHOULDER Ref: NOTE
HARNESSES – CHECK SEAT ADJUSTMENT
MECHANISM, SEAT BELTS AND SHOULDER
HARNESS INERTIA REEL FOR OPERATION
49. CABIN ENTRANCE DOOR: Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK THAT FOLDING STEPS DO NOT FOLD
TOO SOON AND THAT THEY FOLD PROPERLY
WITHOUT INTERFERENCE
b) CHECK CABIN DOOR UNLOCK
ANNUNCIATOR FOR PROPER OPERATION
c) INSPECT CABIN DOOR DAMPER FOR
LEAKAGE AND PROPER OPERATION
50. EMERGENCY EXIT Ref: NOTE
( WITH DOOR INSTALLED )
a) CHECK EMERGENCY RELEASE HANDLES
(inside and outside) AND LATCH MECHANISM
FOR OPERATION
b) CHECK THAT LATCHES OPEN AND CLOSE
FREELY
51. EMPENNAGE CONTROL SURFACES Ref: NOTE
a) CHECK FOR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
b) CHECK OPTIONAL TRIM ACTUATORS
AND MOTORS FOR SMOOTHNESS OF
OPERATION
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
Q. OPERATIONAL INSPECTION, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
52. REAR FUSELAGE AND EMPENNAGE LIGHTS Ref: NOTE
- CHECK OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
53. AILERON (LH AND RH) – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
54. AILERON TRIM TAB – CHECK TRIM TAB Ref: NOTE
ACTUATOR FOR SMOOTHNESS OF
OPERATION AND ATTACHMENT
55. FUEL TANK HEATED VENTS (LH AND RH) – Ref: NOTE
CHECK THE OPERATION OF THE HEATED
VENTS. THEY SHOULD BE WARM TO THE
TOUCH
56. STALL WARNING HEAT – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
57. FLAPS AND ACTUATORS ( Inboard, Outboard, Ref: NOTE
LH and RH) – CHECK FLAPS FOR NOISY
OR ERRATIC OPERATION
58. WING CENTER SECTION LIGHTS – CHECK Ref: NOTE
OPERATION OF ALL LIGHTS
59. ENGINE INDUCTION SYSTEM (LH AND RH)- Ref: NOTE
CHECK THE INERTIAL VANE AND BYPASS
DOOR FOR MOVEMENT WITH THE MAIN
AND STANDBY ACTUATOR MOTORS.
60. EXTERNAL POWER RELAY – CHECK FOR Ref: NOTE
PROPER OPERATION
R. POST INSPECTIONS ITEMS 12-20-00
1. AIRPLANE CLEANED AND SERVICED AS
REQUIRED
2. LUBRICATE AS NECESSARY 12-20-00
3. ENGINE INSPECTED AFTER GROUND RUN-UP
OR FLIGHT TEST – CHECK FOR OIL LEAKS,
SECURITY AND ATTACHMENT OF ALL
COMPONENTS
4. AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES AND
SERVICE BULLETINS – MUST BE REVIEWED
AND COMPLIED WITH AS REQUIRED
5. ADDITIONAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS-
ENSURE THAT SPECIAL INSPECTION
REQUIREMENTS ARE COMPLIED WITH AT
THE APPROPRIATE INTERVALS
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
This Phase Inspection is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
SECTION / AREA / DESCRIPTION ATA Ref: NON CERTIFYING
R. POST INSPECTIONS ITEMS, continue CERTIFYING STAFF:
STAFF:
6. IN-FLIGHT WORKSHEETS – ALL
DISCREPANCIES NOTED BY THE PILOT
MUST BE CHECKED AND CORRECTED AS
REQUIRED
7. EMERGENCY LOCATOR TRANSMITTER – 25-60-00
CHECK FOR PROPER OPERATION AND
ENSURE ELT IS ARMED BEFORE RETURNING
AIRPLANE TO SERVICE
8. OXYGEN SYSTEM PRESSURE – CHECK FOR 12-10-00
PROPER PRESSURE
9. EMERGENCY AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT-
ENSURE ALL NECESSARY EMERGENCY
AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT IS INSTALLED
IN THE AIRPLANE AND IS SERVICEABLE
10. PLACARDS – DETERMINE THAT ALL 11-20-00
REQUIRED PLACARDS ARE IN PLACE AND POH
LEGIBLE
11. LOGBOOK ENTRY – ENSURE THAT LOG MME
BOOKS ARE FILLED OUT PROPERLY
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
CAUTION:
DO NOT MIX different brands of grease as this will cause decreased bearing life. If the grease
is changed, make certain that all the affected components are thoroughly cleaned before
relubrication.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
NOTE:
After washing the airplane, lubricate all lubrication points.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
WARNING:
Remove the lubrication fitting opposite the one being serviced. Failure to do so could result in
damage to the propeller bearings and seals.
Sample Fleet AMP Date: 2005-03-01
PHASE 4 INSPECTION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
WINGS LUBRICATION
Sample Aircraft
LUBRICATION CARD
This Lubrication Card is based on P/N 101-590010-19 Revision B9 – October, 2004, REPS Revision 20A – December
2004.
Certifies that the work specified except as otherwise specified was carried out in accordance with
PART – 145.50, and in respect to that work the aircraft is considered ready for release to service.