Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
ScienceDirect
StructuralIntegrity
Available
Available online
online atProcedia
at 00 (2018) 000–000
www.sciencedirect.com
www.sciencedirect.com
StructuralIntegrity Procedia 00 (2018) 000–000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
ScienceDirect
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
ScienceDirect
Procedia Structural
Structural IntegrityIntegrity
Procedia1300(2018)
(2016)450–455
000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
properties. Higher stiffness and strength of 3D orthogonal woven composites in all three direction makes them
competitive against laminated composites and other 3D textile architectures, Gu and Zhili (2002), Tan et al. (2000).
3D woven architectures can be tailored in accordance with their application in the structure to get more optimized
properties in addition to the better delamination resistance and damage tolerance, Quinn et al. (2003), particularly in
the through-thickness direction, Mouritz et al. (1999).
By adding or replacing the fiber tows with those of different materials, the enhanced material properties can be
achieved for 3D woven composites. Hybridization for the carbon-fiber 3D woven composite has shown improved
notch sensitivity, better impact resistance and improvement in fracture toughness Munoz et al. (2014). However,
some problems associate with these kinds of 3D architectures like during the manufacturing process of liquid resin
molding pockets with rich resin and voids are likely to occur. Due to the crimping of fiber tows during weaving
process it is more likely that mechanical properties of the overall material can be degraded, and most importantly
complex architecture makes it difficult for the designers to predict the mechanical properties and behavior under
impact loadings for such kind of materials. In order to mechanically characterize the 3D woven composites, one way
is to simplify the complex structure without compromising on the overall structure characteristics, some examples
are binary model, unit-cell, and mosaic model, developed in the past.
Both low and high velocity impact behavior of 3D woven composites have been studied in the past. Baucom et al
(2005) compared the low velocity impact behavior of 3D orthogonal woven composites and 2D plain-weave
laminate. It was concluded that the 3D composites absorbed more energy by breaking binder fibers and could take
more strikes before complete penetration. Chen and Hodgkinson (2009) carried out both low and high velocity
impact tests on 3D orthogonal composites and non-crimp fabrics. The results showed that the 3D composites
exhibited superior impact resistance and higher Compression After Impact (CAI) strength than NCF in both low and
high velocity tests, and also showed no delamination. Lv and Gu (2008) compared high velocity impact properties
with quasi static indentation properties of 3D orthogonal woven composites.
The behavior under impact process of 3d woven composites have also been determined through numerical
techniques considering the expensive nature of experimental analysis of the same. Various researchers have
developed different Finite element models and techniques to analyze the behavior of 3D woven composites under
impact loading. Ji et al. (2007) developed an FE model which was built by using solid elements to determine the
failure behavior of 3D woven composite under quasi-static and dynamic loadings. Lv and Gu (2008) and Hao et al.
(2008) characterize the damage behavior of 3d woven composites under high velocity impact by developing the FE
model which was built in ABAQUS and using brick elements. Sun et al. (2009) introduces a unit cell approach to
develop a numerical model to characterize the damage behavior under high velocity impact of 3D woven orthogonal
composites. Munoz et al. (2015) performed experimental and numerical study on the impact behavior of hybrid 3D
orthogonal woven composites. The FE model was based on the embedded element method to depict the through the
thickness z-yarns. It can be concluded that while discussing the numerical modeling of impact behavior of 3D woven
composites, most of the researchers have adopted the solid meshing techniques and to depict the material
constitutive and damage behavior user-subroutine was deployed.
Despite the potential of continuum shell elements, very few researchers adopted the technique to develop the
numerical model for the impact behavior of composites. Current study targets to provide the reliable simulation
technique for the impact behavior of 3D woven composites and the accurate prediction of the impact damage
behavior under high velocity impact. To predict the constitutive and damage behavior of composites during the high
velocity impact process, a combination of cohesive contact and continuum shell elements is proposed in finite
element model. Delamination behavior is characterized by introducing the cohesive contact between the two
adjacent laminas using the traction separation law, while damage, induced during the impact process in the single
layer of composite laminate, is depicted by continuum shell elements with Hashin failure criterion. Connector
elements containing the failure behavior are introduced into the model to represent the z-yarns of the 3D woven
composite. The proposed FE model presented good agreement with experimental results to capture the damage
phenomenon during the impact process.
452 Ahmed Sohail et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 13 (2018) 450–455
Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2018) 000–000 3
2. Modeling Methodology
The finite element model of the impact behavior of 3D hybrid woven composite is modeled using commercial FE
modelling software ABAQUS. The architecture of composite panel included three warp (0 0) and four weft (900)
plies stacked as a cross-ply laminate. Warp and weft fibers are bounded together by z-yarns which run in the warp
fiber direction from top to bottom to bind all the layers. Out of seven layers of the composite laminas, 4 layers are
made up of S2 glass and the other 3 of carbon fibers. Schematic of the architecture for a unit cell of 3D hybrid
woven composite is shown in Fig 1. The warp and weft yarn number 1 and 2 are made up of S2 glass fiber and
remaining fibers are made up of carbon fiber. The overall size of the panel is 100 x 100 mm2 with the thickness of
4.1 mm approximately. A spherical steel projectile with diameter of 5.5mm and 0.706 of mass is selected as an
impactor.
Z-yarn
2 1
3 2
Weft 4 Warp
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of weave architecture in one Unit-cell of 3D hybrid woven composite
Table 1. Elastic constants and strength parameters of composite lamina of 3D hybrid woven composite, Munoz et al. (2015)
Elastic moduli (GPa) Poisson’s ratio Shear Modulus (GPa)
Elastic Constants
E1 E2 E3 υ 12 υ 13 = υ 23 G12 G13 = G23
Carbon 110.1 5.2 7.5 0.32 0.42 4.2 1.95
Glass 42.5 8.6 7.5 0.31 0.41 3.8 1.91
Strength Parameters XT XC YT YC SL
(MPa)
Carbon 2210 1800 69 111 42
Glass 2200 1980 68 109 40
The composite laminate’s constitutive and damage behavior for the impact process of 3D hybrid woven
composite is discussed in previous section. The elastic constants used in the continuum shell elements for the
composite laminas are presented in Table 1. The strength parameters for the Hashin damage failure criterion in this
study are also summarized in Table 1. The interplay properties for the delamination behavior of traction separation
law are listed in Table 2, Shin et al. (2014).
Table 2. Traction separation law for delamination between adjacent plies, Shin et al. (2014)
Density (kg/m3) Effective E (MPa) Damage initiation (MPa) Fracture toughness (mJ/mm2) BK
ρ Knn Kss Ktt 𝑡𝑡𝑛𝑛0 𝑡𝑡𝑛𝑛0 𝑡𝑡𝑛𝑛0 𝐺𝐺𝑛𝑛𝐶𝐶 𝐺𝐺𝑆𝑆𝐶𝐶 𝐺𝐺𝑡𝑡𝐶𝐶 η
1200 100 100 100 40 50 50 0.26 0.52 0.52 1.8
Ballistic performance under high velocity impact of 3D hybrid woven composite panel on the carbon face and the
glass face were simulated using the continuum shell elements for composite laminate and cohesive contact strategy
to capture the delamination under impact. The simulation results are depicted in Fig 2 where residual velocity is
plotted against the impact velocity, together with the experimental results and numerical simulation conducted by
Munoz et al. (2015). The numerical simulation results show that the FE model was able to produce the results which
are in good agreement with the experimental results.
Although the FE simulation presented good results however there are slight variations in terms of residual
velocities measured during the impact process. The residual velocities in the case of impact on carbon face are
slightly over predicted and in the case of impact on glass face the values for residual velocities are under predicted.
Similarly, in the case of ballistic limit the results in both cases are slightly deviated but remains within the 10% of
the experimental data.
In addition to the prediction of the residual velocity, the FE simulations also presented the visual insight about the
impact process when the impactor impacted either on glass or carbon face and shows that how the process unfolds at
different stages of impact which is almost impossible to observe during actual tests. The visual simulation results at
different times of the impact process are presented in Fig 3. Cross-sections of the results of the impact simulations
are shown for the sake of better understanding of the failure behavior during the process. The failed elements are
deleted from the simulation as soon as their failure criteria is reached whether it is fiber compression, fiber tension,
matrix tension and matrix compression. Moreover, the delamination between the adjacent plies is also clearly
evident from the figure.
454 Ahmed Sohail et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 13 (2018) 450–455
Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2018) 000–000 5
Fig. 2. Comparison of residual velocity curves between present study and experimental and numerical study presented by Munoz et al. (2015)
time=0.004 ms time=0.004 ms
time=0.01 ms time=0.01 ms
time=0.02 ms time=0.02 ms
time=0.04 ms time=0.04 ms
Impact at an initial velocity of 350 m/s Impact at an initial velocity of 425 m/s
Fig. 3. Damage within the plies and delamination behavior between the plies at different impact velocities
Ahmed Sohail et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 13 (2018) 450–455 455
6 Author name / StructuralIntegrity Procedia 00 (2018) 000–000
4. Conclusion
The impact behavior of 3D hybrid woven composite under high velocity impact was studied numerically in the
current study. During the FE simulation, to predict the constitutive and damage behavior of composites during the
high velocity impact process, a combination of cohesive contact and continuum shell elements is proposed.
Delamination behavior between the laminas is characterized by introducing the cohesive contact between the two
adjacent plies using the traction separation law, while damage, induced during the impact process in each layer of
composite panel, is depicted by continuum shell elements with Hashin failure criterion. Connector elements
containing the failure behavior are introduced into the model to represent the z-yarns of the 3d woven composite.
The proposed FE model presented good agreement with experimental results in terms of residual velocity of the
impactor and to capture the damage and delamination phenomenon of the composite panel during the impact process
and makes it a valuable tool to estimate the damage under the impact process.
In this paper, continuum shell elements are used for composite laminates because of their efficiency for the
modelling of thin laminated structures as compared to 3D solid elements. Shell elements contain much of the
necessary predictive attributes of complex models while providing the computational efficiency without
compromising the authenticity of the output results. As it is evident from the results of the numerical model that the
shell model can accurately predict the response of the 3D hybrid woven structures efficiently, by that the
computational cost can be greatly reduced.
Overall, the computational strategy, shell elements for composite laminates, Hashin failure criteria for laminated
composite, cohesive contact with cohesive damage for traction separation law and connector element with failure
behavior for incorporation z-yarn, reveals excellent results to determine the impact behavior of 3D woven
composites and can be adopted for different kind of hybrid and non-hybrid composite structures in future.
References
Abaqus, V., 2014. 6.14 Documentation. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation, 651.
Baucom, J.A. and Zikry, M.A., 2005. Low-velocity impact damage progression in woven E-glass composite systems. Composites Part A: Applied
Science and Manufacturing, 36(5), pp.658-664.
Chen, F. and Hodgkinson, J.M., 2009. Impact behaviour of composites with different fibre architecture. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 223(7), pp.1009-1017.
Gu, H. and Zhili, Z., 2002. Tensile behavior of 3D woven composites by using different fabric structures. Materials & Design, 23(7), pp.671-674.
Hao, A., Sun, B., Qiu, Y. and Gu, B., 2008. Dynamic properties of 3-D orthogonal woven composite T-beam under transverse impact. Composite Part
A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 39(7), pp. 1073-1082.
Hashin, Z., 1980. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. Journal of applied mechanics, 47(2), pp.329-334.
Hashin, Z. and Rotem, A., 1973. A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. Journal of composite materials, 7(4), pp.448-464.
Ji, C., Sun, B., Qiu, Y. and Gu, B., 2007. Impact damage of 3D orthogonal woven composite circular plates. Applied Composite Materials, 14(5-6),
pp.343-362.
Lv, L. and Gu, B., 2008. Transverse impact damage and energy absorption of three-dimensional orthogonal hybrid woven composite: Experimental
and FEM simulation. Journal of composite materials, 42(17), pp.1763-1786.
Mouritz, A.P., Bannister, M.K., Falzon, P.J. and Leong, K.H., 1999. Review of applications for advanced three-dimensional fibre textile
composites. Composites Part A: applied science and manufacturing, 30(12), pp.1445-1461.
Muñoz, R., Martínez-Hergueta, F., Gálvez, F., González, C. and LLorca, J., 2015. Ballistic performance of hybrid 3D woven composites: experiments
and simulations. Composite Structures, 127, pp.141-151.
Muñoz, R., Martínez, V., Sket, F., González, C. and LLorca, J., 2014. Mechanical behavior and failure micromechanisms of hybrid 3D woven
composites in tension. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 59, pp.93-104.
Quinn, J., McIlhagger, R. and McIlhagger, A.T., 2003. A modified system for design and analysis of 3D woven preforms. Composites Part A: applied
science and manufacturing, 34(6), pp.503-509.
Shin,D.K., Kim, H.C. and Lee, J.J., 2014. Numerical analysis of the damage behavior of an aluminum/CFRP hybrid beam under three point bending.
Composites Part B: Engineering, 56, pp.397-407.
Sun, B., Liu, Y. and Gu, B., 2009. A unit cell approach of finite element calculation of ballistic impact damage of 3-D orthogonal woven
composite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 40(6), pp.552-560.
Tan, P., Tong, L., Steven, G.P. and Ishikawa, T., 2000. Behavior of 3D orthogonal woven CFRP composites. Part I. Experimental
investigation. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 31(3), pp.259-271.