Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0021-9797/96 $18.00 82
Copyright q 1996 by Academic Press, Inc.
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1. Materials
The solid surfaces used are polytetrafluoroethylene plates
(PTFE) and microscope glass plates. The PTFE surface is
hydrophobic whereas the glass surface is hydrophilic. The
surfaces of the plates were smooth and homogeneous down FIG. 1. Physical properties: (a) Variation of bitumen viscosity with
to the microscopic scale. The plates were cleaned with chro- shear rate at different temperature. (b) Interfacial tension between bitumen
mic acid and then with hot water to remove all impurities. and water at different pH and temperature. (c) Density of distilled water
The plates were also rinsed with ethanol and then with dis- and bitumen at different temperature.
tilled water and dried before use. The bitumen is a coker
feed bitumen supplied by Syncrude Canada Ltd. A notable
changes with pH and temperature. The interfacial tension
difference between this bitumen and a conventional crude oil
was measured using a ring tensiometer (Fisher surface tensi-
is the presence of higher molecular weight (low volatility)
ometer, Model 21). The effect of pH and temperature on
components in bitumen. About 50% is sufficiently volatile to
the interfacial tension of bitumen/water is illustrated in Fig.
vacuum distill without thermal cracking. A typical bitumen
1b. The interfacial tension decreases with an increase in pH
elemental analysis (wt%) is carbon 83%, hydrogen 10.6%,
and temperature. The increase in pH (due to addition of
nitrogen 0.4%, sulphur 4.8%, Conradson carbon 1.2%, and
NaOH), activates the surface-active agents (carboxylic
carbon:hydrogen Å 7:8 (12). Distilled water was used in
type) present at the bitumen/water interface, leading to a
all the experiments. HCl or NaOH were added to obtain the
decrease in the interfacial tension between bitumen and wa-
desired pH level.
ter (13).
2.2. Physical Properties of Bitumen The bitumen density, at different temperatures, was mea-
sured using a hydrometer and is shown in Fig. 1c. On the
The pertinent physical properties of bitumen were mea- same figure, the variation of the water density with tempera-
sured under varying temperature and pH. The viscosity of ture is also plotted. It can be observed that there is little
bitumen was measured at different temperature using a vis- difference between the density of bitumen and water.
cometer (Contraves, rheomat 115). The change of viscosity
with shear rate is presented in Fig. 1a at different tempera- 2.3. Film Thinning and Film Rupture Experiments
tures. For a given temperature, the bitumen viscosity does
not change with shear rate, indicating Newtonian behavior. Experiments on film thinning and rupture were conducted
The interfacial tension between bitumen and water with glass and PTFE plates in order to study the effects of
interface on the solid surface (25, 26), and the second ap- g( ud , l ) Å g( ue , l ) 0 ca ln e 01
s / O(ca)
proach is based on the triple-phase contact line hydrodynam-
* f ( bd,bl )
u
ics (6, 7, 10, 27–30). In the adsorption/desorption model, g( u, l ) Å [4]
the number of adsorption sites involved per unit area is 0
ud ( u 2d 0 u 2e ) Å 6 ca ln e 01 , [5]
water. During this period, the shape of the bitumen sheet is where
assumed to be a segment of a sphere, i.e., a spherical cap
as shown in Fig. 4. Different segments of a sphere form
different contact angles with the plane on which they are
attached. Thus, if the dynamic contact angle is 907, the drop
R Å (4/3) 1 / 3re YF (1 0 cos ud ) (1 0 cos ud ) 3
2 sin ud
/
6 sin 3ud G 1/3
.
VÅ
1 4
ph(3R 2 / h 2 ) Å pr 3e , [9]
1 HF S 3/
1 0 cos ud
sin ud D GYF S
2
1/
1 0 cos ud
sin ud D GJ
2
6 3
F G
the microscopic scale cut-off region, can be estimated from
1 pR R2
(1 0 cos ud ) 3R 2 / (1 0 cos ud ) 2 the ed value when the L, macroscopic length scale cut-off
6 sin ud sin 2ud region, of, say, 1 mm is used.
4 The equivalent radius, re , for different amounts of bitumen
Å pr 3e . [11] coated on the glass surface was measured experimentally.
3
The volume of bitumen was measured using a photographic
method. After reaching equilibrium, the bitumen droplet was
The validity of the above assumption (viz. the shape of the made to detach from the glass plate when the surrounding
bitumen sheet is a segment of a sphere) has been tested for liquid was slightly disturbed. The rising bitumen droplet
the current set of experiments. was photographed and the radius, re , of the drop was then
3.2.3. Model equations and solution method. Differ- measured. The photographic method was particularly conve-
entiating Eq. [11] and replacing dR/dt in Equation [8] by nient as no daughter droplets were formed during the dis-
dud /dt, yields placement of bitumen or as during the detachment of the
bitumen droplet from the glass plate. An indirect method of
d ud
dt
Å0 S
ud sin ud
3mb R DHF S D GY
3/
1 0 cos ud
sin ud
2 bitumen volume estimation was also performed by weighing
the bitumen-coated glass plate. This procedure required bitu-
men density at different temperatures (Fig. 1c). The esti-
F S D GJS D
2
mated bitumen volumes from both of these methods matched
1 0 cos ud 1 quite well (within 0.2%).
1/ sbw (cos ue 0 cos ud ),
sin ud ln( e 01
d ) The bitumen viscosities at different temperatures and bitu-
men/water interfacial tensions for different pH and tempera-
[12] ture, given, respectively, in Figs. 1a and 1b, were used.
4.1. Observations on Film Thinning and Film Rupture 4.2.1. Effect of pH. In Fig. 6, the dynamic contact angle,
ud , of the bitumen/water interface on the glass surface is
A comparison of the extent of bitumen film thinning and plotted against time for two different pH values of 3 and 11
film rupture on a glass plate and a PTFE plate is shown in at a constant temperature of 407C. The dynamic contact angle
Fig. 5. The glass surface is hydrophilic whereas the PTFE is increases with time toward its new equilibrium value in the
hydrophobic. Figure 5a shows the result of placing a few presence of water. The solid and dashed curves of Fig. 6
drops of water at 507C and pH 11 on top of a bitumen film pertain to two different pH values of 11 and 3, respectively.
on a glass plate. The bitumen film is seen to thin down entirely The dynamic contact angle of bitumen is seen to change
on the glass plate. The thinning of the bitumen film on the more rapidly at a lower pH value than at higher pH values,
glass plate is evident by the change in the film’s color from e.g., at t Å 50 s, ud Å 907 for pH 3, whereas, ud Å 367 for
black to light brown. Figure 5b shows the result of a similar pH 11.
FIG. 6. Effect of pH on the evolution of the dynamic contact angle of FIG. 8. Effect of pH on the equilibrium contact angle of bitumen.
bitumen.
FIG. 10. Effect of temperature on the equilibrium contact angle of FIG. 12. Verification of bitumen shape during the dewetting process.
bitumen.
2. Moore, T. F., and Slobod, R. L., Producers Mon. Penn. Oil. Prod. 22. Redon, C., Brzoska, J. B., and F. Brochard-Wyart, Macromolecules
Assoc. 20, 20–30 (1956). 27, 468–471 (1994).
3. Beynon, L. R., J. Inst. Petrol. 57, 1–6 (1971). 23. Shull, K. R., and Karis, T. E., Langmuir 10, 334–339 (1994).
4. Brown, R. B., J. Inst. Petrol. 57, 8–11 (1971). 24. Foister, R. T., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 136, 266–282 (1990).
5. de Genne, P. G., in ‘‘Liquids at Interfaces’’ (J. Charvolin, J. F. Joanny, 25. Blake, T. D., and Haynes, J. M., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 421–423
and J. Zinn-Justin, Eds.), pp. 273–291, 1990. (1969).
6. Hoffman, R., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 50, 228–241 (1975). 26. Blake, T. D., in ‘‘Wettability’’ (J. C. Berg, Ed.), Surfactant Science
Series 49, p. 293. Dekker, New York, 1993.
7. Cox, R. G., J. Fluid Mech. 186, 169–194 (1986).
27. Dussan, V., J. Fluid Mech. 77, 665–684 (1976).
8. Brown, C. E., and Neustadter, E. L., J. Can. Petrol. Tech. 19(3), 100–
28. Dussan, V., Ramé, E., and Garoff, S., J. Fluid Mech. 230, 97–116
110 (1980).
(1991).
9. Teletzke, G. F., Scriven, L. E., and Davis, H. T., Chem. Eng. Commun. 29. Hocking, L. M., and A. D. Rivers, J. Fluid Mech. 121, 425–442
55, 41–81 (1987). (1982).
10. de Gennes, P. G., Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827–863 (1985). 30. Voinov, O. V., Fluid Dyn. 11, 714–721 (1976).
11. Kistler, S. F., in ‘‘Wettability’’ (J. C. Berg, Ed.), Surfactant Science 31. Tanner, L. H., J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 12, 1473–1484 (1979).
Series 49, pp. 311–429. Dekker, New York, 1993. 32. Hansen, R. J., and T. Y. Toong, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 36, 410–413
12. Liu, J. K., in ‘‘AOSTRA Technical Handbook on Oil Sands, Bitumen (1971).
and Heavy Oils’’ (L. G. Hepler and Chu Hsi, Eds.), Vol. 6, pp. 11– 33. Boender, W., Chesters, A. K., and van der Zanden, A. J. J., Int. J.
31, 1989. Multiphase Flow 17, 661–676 (1991).
13. Takamura, K., and E. E. Isaacs, in ‘‘AOSTKA Technical Handbook 34. Hocking, L. M., in ‘‘Proceedings, 2nd International Colloquium on
on Oil Sands, Bitumen and Heavy Oils’’ (L. G. Hepler and Chu Hsi, Drops and Bubbles, Pasadena, CA, 1982,’’ JPL Publ. 82-7 NASA-JPL,
Eds.), Vol. 6, pp. 101–128, 1989. pp. 315–321.
14. Deryagin, B. V., Kolloid Z. 17, 205–214 (1955). 35. Batchelor, G. K., ‘‘An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,’’ p. 220. Cam-
15. Williams, M. B., and Davis, S. H., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 90, 220– bridge Univ. Press, 1993.
228 (1982). 36. Clayfield, E. J., Dixon, A. G., Foulds, A. W., and Miller, R. J. L., J.
Colloid Interface Sci. 104, 500–511 (1985).
16. Sharma, A., and Ruckenstein, E., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 113, 456–
37. Zisman, W. A., Adv. Chem. Ser. 43, 11, 241, 1964.
479 (1986).
38. Calvo, A., Paterson, I., Chertcoff, R., Rosen, M., and Hulin, J. P. J.
17. Kheshgi, H. S., and L. E. Scriven, Chem. Eng. Sci. 46, 519–526
Colloid Interface Sci. 141, 384–394 (1991).
(1991). 39. Fermigier, M., and Jenffer, P., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 146, 226–241
18. Brochard-Wyart, F., and J. Daillant, Can. J. Phys. 68, 1084–1088 (1991).
(1990). 40. Mumley, T. E., Radke, C. J., and Williams, M. C., J. Colloid Interface
19. Reiter, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 75–78 (1992). Sci. 109, 398–412 (1986).
20. Reiter, G., Langmuir 9, 1344–1351 (1993). 41. Zhou, M. Y., and Sheng, P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 882–885 (1990).
21. Redon, C., Brochard-Wyart, F., and F. Rodelex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 42. Chen, J. D., and Wade, N. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 148, 207–222
715–718 (1991). (1992).