Copyright © 1991 ASM International®
ASM Handbook, Volume 4: Heat Treating
ASM Handbook Committee, p 601-619
Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated
Parts
Anil Kumar Sinha, Bohn Piston Division
MOST OF THE PROBLEMS in heat-
treated parts are attributed to faulty heat-
treatment practices (such as overheating and
burning, and nonuniform heating and quench-
ing), deficiency in the grade of steels used,
part defect, improper grinding, and/or poor
part design. This article discusses overheat-
ing and burning, residual stresses, quench
cracking, and distortion in some detail and
offers some suggestions to combat them.
Most of these conditions result in a charac-
teristic appearance of the treated parts that
can be easily recognized by simple inspec-
tion. Some of these factors do not produce
any distinguishing features in the semifin-
ished or finished part. In particular, some of
the visual evidence does not recognize the
presence of overheating and burning and the
development of residual stresses leading to
distortion, quench cracking, and eventual
failure of the heat-treated parts; metallurgical
laboratory examination is needed to establish
these problems that contribute significantly to
the service performance of the part. Tool
designers must also be aware of the problems
and difficulties in manufacture, heat treat-
ment, and use.
Overheatin 8 and Burning of
Low-Alloy Steels
When low-alloy steels are preheated to
high temperature (usually > 1200 °C, or 2200
°F), prior to hot mechanical working (such as
forging) for a long period, a deterioration in
the room-temperature mechanical properties
(particularly tensile ductility and impact
strength or toughness) can be obtained after
the steel has been given a final heat treatment
(comprising reaustenitizing, quenching, and
tempering) (Ref 1-3). Linked with the im-
paired mechanical properties is the appear-
ance of intergranular matte facets on the
normal ductile fracture surface of an impact
specimen. This phenomenon is known as
overheating and has been a matter of con-
cern, especially in the case of steel forgings.
Overheating has also been noticed in steel
castings (due to variation in pouring temper-
All rights reserved.
www.asminternational.org
ature and effectiveness of the proprietary
grain inoculants applied to the mold surface),
in heavily ground parts, and in affected zones
of welds (Ref 4). The usual practice is to
reject the overheated products as being un-
suitable for service.
It has now been established that over-
heating is essentially a reversible process
caused by the solution of MnS particles in
austenite during heating or reheating at high
temperatures; the amount increases with
temperature, and its subsequent reprecipi-
tation during cooling occurs at intermediate
rates as very fine ( - 0 . 5 i~m) arrays of
a-MnS particles on the austenite grain
boundaries. On subsequent heat treatment
the intergranular network of sulfides may
provide a preferential, lower-energy frac- 166,6 ~rn
ture path in contrast to a normal transgran-
ular fracture path. As a result, when impact
loaded, a ductile intergranular fracture de-
velops due to decohesion of the MnS/matrix
interface and progress of microvoid coales-
cence. Figures 1 (a) and (b) show the usual
appearance of the fracture surface at differ-
ent magnifications (Ref 1).
When the low-alloy steel is preheated
prior to hot working at too high a tempera-
ture (normally > 1400 °C, or 2550 °F), local
melting occurs at the austenite grain bound-
aries as a result of the segregation of phos-
phorus, sulfur, and carbon (Ref 5). During
cooling, initially dendritic sulfides (proba-
bly type II-MnS) form within the phospho-
rus-rich austenite grain boundary, which
then transforms to ferrite. This results in I 12.5 p,rn I
excessively weak boundaries. Subsequent
heat treatment provides a very poor impact Fracture surface of an impact loaded speci-
strength and almost completely intergranu- Fig 1 men. (a) Appearance of intergranular fracture
lar fracture surface after impact failure. of 4.25Ni-Cr-Mo steel containing 0.34% Mn and
This phenomenon is termed burning. Burn- 0.008% S, in fully heat-treated condition but after
cooling from 1400 °C (2550 °F) at 10 °C/min (20 °F/rain).
ing thus occurs at a higher temperature than (b) Same specimen as in (a) but at higher magnifica-
overheating. If this occurs during forging, tion, showing ductile dimples nucleated by MnS par-
the forging will often break during cooling ticles precipitated at austenite grain boundaries.
o r subsequent heat treatment (Ref 4). Courtesy of The Institute of Metals
Detection of Overheating heating, namely, fracture testing and metal-
There are two basic methods for the lography (or etch testing). Overheating may
determination of the occurrence of over- also be detected by a decrease in mechani-
602 / Process and Quality Control Considerations

Table 1 Etching characteristics of overheated and burned steels

Reagent Method Action on overheated steel Action on burned steel

2.5% nitric acid in ethyl
alcohol
Saturated aqueous solution
o f ammonium nitrate
Aqueous 10% nitric acid +
10% sulfuric acid
85% orthophosphoric acid
(Fine's reagent)
Oberhoffer's reagent
Source: Ref 13
Swab surface for 30 s
Electrolytic, specimen anode,
current density 1.0 A cm -2
(6.5 A in. -2)
Etch for 30 s, swab surface;
repeat three times, then
repolish lightly
Electrolytic, specimen anode,
current density 0.15 A cm -2
(1.0 A in.-2), etching time 15
min
Swab surface for 30 s
May produce grain contrast, but White boundaries outlining
not indicative of overheating preexisting austenite grains
White boundaries outlining Black boundaries outlining
preexisting grains preexisting austenite grains
Black boundaries outlining White boundaries outlining
preexisting austenite grains preexisting austenite grains
Does not differentiate between Attacks inclusions at grain
overheated and nonoverheated boundaries
steel
Does not differentiate between Shows phosphorus segregation at
overheated and n o n o v e r h e a t e d grain boundaries
steel

cal properties. But such changes are not
very marked unless overheating tempera-
ture is high or overheating is too prolonged
or severe; in some instances the mechanical
properties do not change, even after the
observation of extensive faceting. Usually
the two methods mentioned above should
be used in conjunction with some measure
of toughness by impact or other testing in
order to get a clear understanding of the
degree and severity of overheating (Ref 2).
Fracture Testing. The direction of fracture
testing is important in steels manufactured
by conventional methods. It has been ob-
served by some workers (Ref 6) that the
longitudinal fracture test specimens parallel
to the rolling direction do not exhibit face-
ring until the corresponding transverse frac-
tures display extensive faceting. However,
the testing direction in electroslag-refined
(ESR) steels has been found to be insignif-
icant (Ref 7).
The scanning electron microscope is con-
sidered to be the best and most convenient
tool to detect the facets on the overheated
fracture surfaces. These facets are charac-
terized by small, well-defined, ductile dim-
ples; each dimple is usually nucleated, pre-
sumably by fine arrays of inclusion
particles: a-MnS particles (Fig 1) in Mn-
bearing steels (Ref 8, 9) or chromium sul-
fides in Mn-free steels (Ref 10, 11).
It is now well recognized that the fracture
test specimen should always be tested in the
toughest possible state (for example,
quenched and highly tempered [in the range
600 to 650 °C, or I 110 to 1200 °F] steels after
high-temperature austenitization) because
this condition is most prone to overheating
effects. Baker and Johnson (Ref 5) have
suggested that an increased proportion of
facets in the fracture specimens with in-
creasing tempering temperature is attribut-
ed to the corresponding increase of the
plastic zone size. In this case a slight
amount of weakening will be sufficient to
impart faceting because the grain boundary
strength becomes lower (Ref 2). It should be
noted that the existence of facets in the
fractured specimens is not always associat-
ed with a lowering of impact strength (Ref
12).
Metallography (or Etch Testing). The most
widely used etchant technique uses
Austin's reagent (aqueous solution of 10%
nitric and 10% sulfuric acids), ammonium
persulfate, molten zinc chloride, saturated
solution of picric acid at 60 °C (140 °F), and
an electrolytic etch based on saturated
aqueous ammonium nitrate. Table 1 shows
the etching characteristics of overheated
and burned steels (Ref 13). The etchant
procedure with Austin's etchant is as fol-
lows: The sectioned specimen is etched for
30 s in the etchant, removed, washed off,
and repeated three times. If the steel has
been overheated, the original austenite
grain boundaries will be preferentially at-
tacked, and a black network of etch pits will
be observed under the microscope (Ref 14).
According to Preece and Nutting (Ref 13),
the best results are obtained when ammoni-
um nitrate etch is applied on the sectioned
steel specimen in the fully heat-treated con-
dition where this etchant preferentially at-
tacks the matrix (original austenite grains),
leaving the grain boundary unaffected
(which appears as a white network).
Bodimeade (Ref 15) concluded that all these
etchants did not cope with mildly overheat-
ed low-sulfur steels. Table 2 is a summary
of the results of potentiostatic etching tech-
niques carried out by McLeod (Ref 12)
using nitric-sulfuric, saturated aqueous pic-
ric acid (at 60 °C, or 140 °F), and ammonium
nitrate etchants. He considered that when
the suitable etching conditions were estab-
lished, the potentiostatic etching method
rendered more reliable and reproducible
results as compared with the conventional
etching techniques. However, the same
problem with mildly overheated low-sulfur
steels still persisted. Hence, the use of etch
tests for low-sulfur low-alloy steels is not
recommended for the detection of mild
overheating.
Detection and Effects of Burning
Burning is not commonly encountered.
The two etchants (namely, nitric-sulfuric
acid and ammonium nitrate solution) used
for overheating can be successfully em-
ployed for detecting burning. When applied
to burned steels, these etchants react in a
manner opposite to that of overheated
steels. Preece and Nutting (Ref 13) found
ammonium nitrate solution to be the ideal
reagent to detect this phenomenon. Other
reagents are Stead's and Oberhoffer's re-
agents, which may also be used to check the
burning effect. However, these etchants are
unable to differentiate between overheated
and nonoverheated steels.
Factors Affecting Overheating
The occurrence and severity of overheat-
ing depend principally on important factors,
notably steel composition, temperature,
cooling rate, and method of manufacture.
Composition. Sulfur is the constituent
that greatly influences overheating. For
steels with less than 0.002 wt% sulfur, over-
heating does not occur; this is because of
the very low volume fraction of sulfides
formed. However, the commercial produc-
tion of such very-low-sulfur steels (for ex-
ample, ESR steels) is expensive. Above this
level of sulfur, the overheating onset tem-
perature rises with the increasing amount of
sulfur. It has now been explained that steels
with low sulfur content (0.01 to 0.02%) are
more prone to this defect than those with
high sulfur content (>0.3%) because the
transgranular strength is high, and therefore
a small amount of grain-boundary sulfide
precipitation is enough to induce intergran-
ular failure (Ref 16). The phosphorus con-
tent has been regarded with the most con-
cern in connection with burning. At
constant phosphorus level, there is an in-
crease in the overheating temperature with
the increase of sulfur content, whereas the
burning onset temperature decreases. Burn-
ing temperature is reduced with the increase
in phosphorus content. At low sulfur con-
tents, a wide gap between overheating and
burning temperatures exists. For example,
in the case of vacuum remelted steels, the
temperature gap between the onset of over-
heating and burning is - 3 0 0 to 400 °C (-570
 Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 603

Table 2 Summaryof potentiostatic etching experiments produces cracking and distortion of the
Best etching conditions
parts (Ref 2).
Anodic loop
Solution voltage, mV Observed effect Voltage, mV Observed effect Comments Reclamation of Overheated Steel
Saturated aqueous -400 Slight general 2200 (for 2 Classic white Operates best in the Severely overheated steels can often be
ammonium etching min) boundaries on a transpassive region at
nitrate dark background >+1500 mV; time at
completely restored by any of the following
any potential is heat treatments:
important
Underetching: random • Repeated normalizing (as many as six)
array of black pits
Overetching: uniform starting at temperatures 50 to 100 °C (90
black surface film to 180 °F) higher than usual, followed by
Aqueous 10% nitric 200 Vigorous None Most aggressive etchant a standard normalizing treatment (Ref 2)
acid + 10% dissolution of the three examined • Repeated oil-hardening and tempering
sulfuric acid of specimen;
formation of
treatments after prolonged soaking at 950
flaky black to 1150 °C (1740 to 2100 °F) in carburizing
film atmosphere. Rehardening more than
-250 Milder attack; About -250 Discontinuous Polish lightly after etching three times is not advisable
large black (for 30 s) array of to eliminate matrix
pits in grain-boundary etching effects
• Soaking at 900 to 1150 °C (1650 to 2100
mildly pits and some °F) for several hours. This causes growth
etched random pits of MnS particles by the Ostwald ripening
matrix within grains process and results in an excessive scale
Saturated aqueous 100 No real, None Anodic loop very weak,
picfic acid at positive necessitating long
formation and a loss of dimensional accu-
60°C (140 °F) indication of etching times because racy of the forgings
overheating current density is very
low; Teepol additions
gave no improvement Residual Stresses
Source: Ref 12 Heat treatment often causes stress- and
strain-related problems such as residual
stress, quench cracks, and deformation and/
to 750 °F) and there is a remote possibility between a temperature low enough for the or distortion. The residual stress may be
of burning occurring within the forging metal to be safe and high enough to be defined as the self-equilibrating internal or
range, unless the overheating is severe (Ref sufficiently plastic. The better the tempera- locked-in stress remaining within a body with
2). However, at high sulfur content the gap ture control, the better the compromise. no applied (external) force, external con-
becomes narrow. Severe overheating can be reduced to straint, or temperature gradient (Ref 18, 19).
Temperature. To avoid overheating, care mild overheating by soaking the steel at There are two types of residual stresses:
must be exercised in choosing a correct 1200 °C (2200 °F); with care, it may be
• M a c r o - or long-range residual stress is a
heating temperature so that uneven heating, removed completely. Hot working through
first-order stress that represents an aver-
flame impingement, and so forth, do not the overheating range to a low finish tem-
age of body stresses over all the phases in
occur (Ref 3). perature is also reported to remove the
polyphase materials. Macroresidual
Cooling Rates. The cooling rate through effects of overheating.
stresses act over large regions as com-
the overheating range affects the size and The alloying additions with a greater sul-
pared to the grain size of the material.
dispersion of intergranular et-MnS particles. fide-forming tendency, such as calcium, zir- Traditionally, engineers consider only
The intermediate cooling rate generally em- conium, cerium ( - 0 . 3 % of the melt), or
this type Of residual stress when design-
ployed, 10 to 200 °C/min (20 to 360 °F/min), mixed rare earth metals (in the form of
ing mechanical parts
gives rise to maximum faceting as well as to misch metal containing 52% Ce, 25% La,
• Microresidual stress, also t e r m e d tesse-
the greatest loss in impact strength. How- and 12% Nd), have been shown to increase
lated stress or short-range stress is a
ever, slow and rapid cooling rates will sup- significantly both the overheating tempera-
second-order or texture stress, which is
press overheating. At very slow cooling ture and mechanical properties of the steel
associated with lattice defects (such as
rates, the sulfide particles become large, (for example, ductility and toughness). Pro-
vacancies, dislocations, and pile-up of
small in number, and more widely dis- vided that a high Ce/S ratio (>2) existed, a
dislocations) and fine precipitates (for ex-
persed, and they have no more deleterious complete change in sulfide morphology oc-
ample, martensite) (Ref 20-22). Microre-
effects than the other inclusions already curred in low-alloy steels where the elon-
sidual is the average stress across one
present. At rapid rates, the sulfide inclu- gated MnS inclusion occurring in the un-
grain or part of the grain of the material.
sions are too fine to produce any damaging treated steel was totally replaced by small This information is indispensable in
effect (Ref 17). globular type-I rare earth sulfides and ox-
studying the essential behavior of materi-
Methods of Manufacture. Electroslag- ysulfides of high thermal stability even after
al deformation
remelted steels are less susceptible than austenitizing at 1400 °C (2550 °F) (Ref 2).
vacuum-remelted steels, presumably due to This treatment does not show intergranular These two types of residual stresses may
the difference in oxygen level. Similarly, faceting. Burning can also be avoided in the also be classified further as a tensile or
nickel steels are more prone to overheating. same way by treating with calcium, zirconi- compressive stress located near the surface
Vacuum-remelted steels have a lower over- um, cerium, or mixed rare earth addition to or in the body of a material. This section
heating temperature than some comparable form refractory, less-soluble sulfides. focuses on the effects, development, con-
air-melted steels. Control of Cooling Rates. Control of cool- trol, and measurement of long-range resid-
ing rates is not a practical method for large ual stresses.
Prevention of Overheating and forgings because extremely slow cooling is
Burning prohibitively time consuming and causes Effects of Residual Stress
F o r preventing overheating of steels, a excessive scaling and decarburization, and The major effects of residual stress in-
properly selected temperature should lie rapid quenching from high temperatures clude dimensional changes and resistance to
604 / Process and Quality Control Considerations

Surface residual stress (root of notch), ks• and nonferrous alloys, and surface harden-
-200 -160 -120 -80 -40 0 40 ing treatments are widely used to produce
1100 8645 notch cold rolled I 8645 notch warm rolled 160 residual compressive stresses at the compo-
0.25 notch radius/~- I 0.25 notch radius nent surface.
~i~ J / 18645 I Residual tensile stresses at the surface of a
1045 j I-"~.~/ I shot peenedI
untempered a~-,,,,L// • j14B35 part are usually undesirable because they
825 I 1045- ~,, " temper~-- 120 can effectively increase the stress levels;
~. tempered ..... may cause unpredicted stress-corrosion
cracking (due to the combined effect of
t e , ~ , e r e d • \ ~\ ~ , temperecl .~ stress and environment), fatigue failure,
._E I 8630-N ~ \ .E_ quench cracking, and grinding checks at
-~
= 550 I I tempered~ 8630 80 °~
N low external stresses; and tend to reduce
Specimen X ~ / o i l quenched fatigue life and strength of a part. In this
case the extent of residual stresses may be
6.75 ~ ~'~1 8660 oil uenched "¢'
i 8645 - - " ~ ~. / closer or even larger than the strength of the
275 -I I tempered [ ~ ' ~ - ~ _ ~ 40 material.
Residual tensile stresses in the interior of
L_ 1.750 in. L1.550 in. diam ~ 8645 oil quenched a component also may be damaging because
60° V-notch 1
diam 0.025 root radiu Compression ~--~-Tension of the existence and consequence of defects
0 i i I I 0 that serve as stress raisers in the interior
-1375 -1100 -825 -550 -275 0 275 part. The uncommon phenomenon of de-
Surface residual stress (root of notch), MPa layed cracking, in the absence of adverse
Effect of surface residual stress on the endurance limit of selected steel. All samples were water environments and large applied stresses,
Fig 2 quenched except as shown, and all specimen dimensions are given in inches. Source: Ref 23, 24 has now been attributed to the action of
residual stresses on minute defects in the
material (Ref 26). For example, a 17.5 cm
crack initiation. Dimensional changes occur with the surface residual compressive stress (6.9 in.) diam × 125 cm (49.2 in.) long steel
when the residual stress (or a portion of it) developed by specific heat treatment and shaft exploded into several pieces while
in a body is eliminated. In terms of crack surface processing. It is also apparent that, lying free of any applied loads, on a labora-
initiation, residual stresses can be either in the presence of high compressive stress, tory floor. Under normal loading, it would
beneficial or detrimental, depending on a poor microstructure in steel samples has a have required a tensile strength larger than
whether the stress is tensile or compressive. small influence on good endurance limit 150 MPa (22 ks•) to rupture the shaft.
Compressive Residual Stress. Because re- fatigue strength (Ref 23-25). These fatigue Hence, the understanding of residual stress
sidual stresses are algebraically summed improvements are of great significance in formation is very important, and this must
with applied stresses, residual compressive components, particularly where stress rais- be given due consideration in the manufac-
stresses in the surface layers are generally ers, such as notches, keyways, oil holes, ture and performance analysis of processed
helpful because the built-in compressive and so forth, are highly desirable in the parts (Ref 26).
stresses can reduce the effects of imposed design of components (for example, crank-
tensile stresses that may produce cracking shafts, half-shafts, and so on) (Ref 26). Development of Residual Stress in
or failure. Compressive stresses therefore Many fabrication methods have been devel- Processed Parts
contribute to the improvement of fatigue oped to exploit this phenomenon. Pre- Variations in stresses, temperature, and
strength and resistance to stress-corrosion stressed parts (including shrink-fits, pre- chemical species within the body during
cracking in a part and an increase in the stressed concrete, interference fits, bolted processing cause the production of mac-
bending strength of brittle ceramics and parts, coined holes, wire-wound concrete roresidual stresses. Various manufacturing
glass (Ref 22). pipe), mechanical surface working pro- processes such as forming, machining, heat
Figure 2 shows that the endurance limit cesses (such as shot peening, surface roil- treatment, shot peening, casting, welding,
fatigue strength of selected steels increases ing, lapping, and so on) of hardened ferrous flame cutting, and plating render their char-
acteristic residual stress pattern to pro-
cessed parts. Table 3 lists a summary of
Table 3 Summary of compressive and tensile residual stresses at the surface of the parts compressive and tensile residual stresses at
created by the common manufacturing processes the surface of parts fabricated by common
Compression at the surface Tension at the surface
manufacturing processes.
I n heat-treated parts, residual stresses
Surface working: shot peening, surface rolling,
lapping, and so on
Rod or wire drawing with deep penetration may be classified as those caused by a
Rolling with deep penetration thermal gradient alone, and a thermal gra-
Rod or wire drawing with shallow penetration(a) Swaging with deep penetration
Rolling with shallow penetration(a) Tube sinking of the outer surface dient in combination with a structural
Swaging with shallow penetration(a) Plastic bending of the shortened side change (phase transformation). When a
Tube sinking of the inner surface
Coining around holes
Grinding: normal practice and abusive conditions steel part is quenched from the austenitizing
Direct-hardening steel (through-hardened)(b) temperature to room temperature, a residu-
Plastic bending of the stretched side Decarburization of steel surface
Grinding under gentle conditions Weldment (last portion to reach room temperature) al stress pattern is established due to a
Hammer peening Machining: turning, milling combination of thermal gradient and local
Quenching without phase transformation Built-up surface of shaft transformation-induced volume expansion.
Direct-hardening steel (not through-hardened) Electrical discharge machining
Case-hardening steel Thermal contraction develops nonuni-
Flame cutting
Induction and flame hardening form thermal (or quenching) stress due to
Prestressing different rates of cooling experienced by
Ion exchange the surface and interior of the steel part.
(a) Shallow penetration refers to ~<1%reduction in area or thickness; deep penetration refers to ~1%. (b) Depends on the efficiency of Transformational volume expansion in-
quenching medium. Source: Ref 22
duces transformation stress arising from
 Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 605

Table 4 Changes in volume during the Table 5 Relevant physical properties in the development of thermal stresses
transformation of austenite into different Coefficient of
phases Modulus of elasticity expansion Thermal conductivity
Change in volume, %, as Metal GPa psi x 10 6 10-6/K 10-6pF W m -1 k -l Btu in./ft 2 • h • ° F
a function of carbon
Transformation content ( % C ) Pure iron (ferrite) 206 30 12 7 80 555
Typical austenitic steel 200 29 18 10 15 100
Spheroidized pearlite - 4 . 6 4 + 2.21 × (% C) Aluminum 71 10 23 13 201 1400
---, austenite Copper 117 17 17 9 385 2670
Austenite ~ 4.64 - 0.53 x (% C) Titanium 125 18 9 5 23 160
martensite
Spheroidized pearlite 1.68 x (% C) Source: Ref 29
martensite
Austenite ~ lower 4.64 - 1.43 × (% C)
bainite
Spheroidized pearlite 0.78 x (% C) ture gradients in good thermal conductors illustration of the distribution of residual
lower bainite (for example, copper and aluminum), but it stress over the diameter of a quenched bar
Austenite ~ upper 4.64 - 2.21 x (% C) is much more likely in steel and titanium due solely to thermal contraction in the
bainite
Spheroidized pearlite 0
(Ref 29). Another term involving thermal longitudinal, tangential, and radial direc-
upper bainite conductivity, called thermal diffusivity tions (Ref 19).
(Dth), is sometimes used in context with The maximum residual stress attained on
Source: Ref 4
temperature gradient. It is defined a s D t h = quenching increases as the quenching tem-
k/pc, where k is the thermal conductivity, p perature and quenching power of the cool-
is the density, and c is the specific heat. It is ant are increased. Tempered glass is made
the transformation of austenite into mar- clear that low Oth (or k) promotes large by utilizing quenching techniques in which
tensite or other transformation products temperature gradient or thermal contrac- glass is heated uniformly to the annealing
(Ref 27). Table 4 lists the changes in vol- tion. It should be emphasized that large size temperature and then surface cooled rapidly
ume during the transformation of austenite of the part and high heating or cooling rates by cold air blasts. This produces compres-
into different structural constituents (Ref (severity) of quenching medium also aug- sive surface stresses to counteract any ten-
28). ment temperature gradients leading to large sile bending stress, if developed during
Thermal Contraction. The relation be- thermal contraction. loading of the glass, thereby increasing its
tween the thermal stress ~th during cooling Table 5 lists some of the relevant material load-carrying capacity (Ref 31).
and the corresponding temperature gradient properties that affect thermal and residual Residual Stress Pattern Due to Thermal
in the component is given by: stresses (Ref 29). and Transformational Volume Changes (Ref
Residual Stress Pattern Due to Thermal 32). During quench hardening of a steel (or
tYth = E- AT" ct (Eq 1)Contraction. Residual stress is developed other hardenable alloy) part, hard martens-
where E is the modulus of elasticity, and tx during quenching of a hot solid part that ite forms at the surface layers, associated
is the thermal coefficient of expansion of involves thermal volume changes without with the volume expansion, whereas the
the material. It is thus apparent that thermal solid-state phase transformation. This situ- remainder of the part is still hot and ductile
stresses are greatest for materials with high ation also exists when a steel part is cooled austenite. Later, the remainder austenite
elastic modulus and coefficient of thermal from a tempering temperature below the A t. transforms to martensite, but its volumetric
expansion. Temperature gradient is also a Figure 3 shows the development of longitu- expansion is restricted by the hardened
function of thermal conductivity. Hence, it dinal thermal and residual stresses in a 100 surface layer. This restraint causes the cen-
is quite unlikely to develop high-tempera- mm (4 in.) diam steel bar on water quench- tral portion to be under compression with
ing from the austenitizing temperature, 850 the outer surface under tension. Figure 4(c)
°C (1560 °F) (Ref 30). At the start of cooling, illustrates the residual stress distribution
Water quenched the surface temperature S falls drastically as over the diameter of a quenched bar show-
100 mm (4 in.)
specimen
compared to the center temperature C (top ing volume expansion associated with phase
1000 left sketch of Fig 3). At time w, the temper- transformation in the longitudinal, tangen-
? c w 1700 ou- ature difference between the surface and tial, and radial directions (Ref 19). At the
core is at a maximum of about 550 °C (1020 same time during the final cooling of the
~ 500
1100 ~ °F), corresponding to a thermal stress of interior, its contraction is hindered by the
~. u 1200 MPa (80 tons/in. E) due to linear differ- hardened surface layers. This restraint in
600
E ential contraction of about 0.6%, if relax- contraction produces tensile stresses in the
~- 0 100 ~- ation does not take place. Under these interior and compressive stresses at the
1 10 103 Time, s conditions, tensile stresses are developed in outer surface. However, the situation as
the case with a maximum value of a (lower shown in Fig 4(c) prevails, provided that the
diagram), corresponding to time w in the net volumetric expansion in the interior,
upper diagram, and the core will contract, after the surface has hardened, is larger
producing compressive stresses with a max- than the remaining thermal contraction. In
imum of b. The combined effect of tensile some particular conditions, these volumet-
and compressive stresses on the surface and ric changes can produce sufficiently large
residual stresses that can cause plastic de-
_

core, respectively, will result in residual

•

e~ e~ stresses as indicated by curve C, where a formation on cooling, leading to warping or

E
o
E
o complete neutralization of stress will occur distortion of the steel part. While plastic
at some lower temperature u. Further de- deformation appears to reduce the severity
D e v e l o p m e n t of thermal a n d residual stresses crease in temperature, therefore, produces of quenching stresses, in most severe
Fig 3 in the longitudinal direction in a 100 m m (4 in.) longitudinal, compressive residual stresses quenching the quenching stresses are so
diameter steel bar on w a t e r q u e n c h i n g from the aus-
tenitizing t e m p e r a t u r e , 850 °C (1560 °F). Transforma-
at the surface and the tensile stresses at the high that they do not get sufficiently re-
tion stresses are not taken into c o n s i d e r a t i o n . Source: core, as shown in the lower right-hand leased by plastic deformation. Consequent-
Ref 30 diagram of Fig 3. Figure 4(a) is a schematic ly, the large residual stress remaining may
606 / Process and Quality Control Considerations
+~
Longitudinal
I L = longitudinal
Tangential
I R = radial
I
Radial
(a)
Schematic illustration of the distribution of residual stress over the diameter of a quenched bar in the
F i g 4 longitudinal, tangential, and radial directions due to (a) thermal contraction and (c) both thermal and
transformational volume changes. (b) Schematic illustration of orientation of directions. Source: Ref 19
reach or even exceed fracture stress of
steel. This localized rupture or fracture is
called quench cracking (Ref 32, 33).
It should be emphasized again that for a
given grade of steel, both large size of the
part and higher quenching speed contribute
to the larger value of thermal contraction,
as compared to the volumetric expansion,
of martensite. In contrast, when the parts
are thin and the quenching rate is not high,
thermal contraction of the part subsequent
to the hardening of the surface will be
smaller than the volumetric expansion of
martensite. Similarly, for a given quenching
rate, the temperature gradients decrease
with decreasing section thickness, and con-
sequently the thermal component of the
residual stress is also decreased (Ref 24).
Figure 5(a) shows the continuous cooling
transformation diagram of DIN 22CrMo44
low-alloy steel exhibiting austenitic decom-
position with the superimposed cooling
curves of the surface and center in round
bars of varying dimensions. If the large-
diameter (100 mm, or 4 in.) bar is water
quenched (that is, for slack quenching),
martensitic transformation occurs at the
surface, and pearlitic + bainitic transforma-
tions occur at the center, resulting in a
residual stress pattern (top of Fig 5) similar
to that due solely to thermal stress (Fig 4a).
I surface transforms before, the stress rever-
Ii
Longitudinal
.~_ T j
I during the tempering and finish-machining
I Residual Stress Pattern after Surface Hard-
i
I temperature (600 to 700 °C, or ll00 to 1300
T= tangential Tang?ntial
I relaxation of any transformation stresses.
t-'--->'
Rad al
(b) (el
During the rapid quenching of the medium-
size (30 mm, or 1.2 in.) bar diameter, the
start of bainite transformation at the center
coincides approximately with the transfor-
mation of martensite on the surface. This
results in compressive stresses at both the
surface and center, with tensile stresses in
the intermediate region (middle of Fig 5).
When the smaller-diameter (10 mm, or 0.4
in.) bar is drastically quenched (for exam-
ple, in brine), the entire bar transforms to
martensite. This is associated with very
little temperature variation between the sur-
face and the center of the part. In this
situation, tensile residual stress is devel-
oped at the surface and compressive stress
at the center of the bar (bottom, Fig 5) (Ref
34, 35).
Although the shallower hardening steels
exhibit higher surface compressive stresses,
deep hardening steels may develop moder-
ately high surface compressive stresses
with severe water quenching. When these
deep hardening steels are through-hardened
in a less efficient quenchant, they may
exhibit surface tensile stresses (Ref 24, 31).
Rose has pointed out the importance of
transformations of core and surface before
and after the stress reversal. According to
him the tensile surface residual stress oc-
curs when the core transforms after, and the
sal (Fig 4c and bottom of Fig 5), whereas
compressive surface residual stress takes
place when the core transforms before, and
the surface transforms after, the stress re-
versal (top of Fig 5). His analysis is capable
of explaining complex stress patterns for
various combinations of part sizes, quench-
ing rate, and steel hardenability (Ref 21).
However, the residual stress pattern in the
hardened steels can be modified either with
different transformation characteristics or
(after hardening) operations.
ening. In general, thermochemical and ther-
mal surface-hardening treatments produce
beneficial compressive residual stresses at
the surface.
Carburized and Quenched Steels. When
low-carbon steels are carburiZed and
quenched, first the core transforms at high
°F) to ferrite and pearlite with the attendant
Later, the high-carbon case transforms to
martensite at much lower temperature (less
than 300 °C, or 570 °F), accompanied by
volume expansion and under conditions of
no (or minimum) stress relaxation. As a
result, residual compressive stress is devel-
oped in the case with a maximum at the
surface.
Large differences in carbon level between
the case and the core determine the se-
quence of phase transformation on cooling
after carburizing and the resultant develop-
ment of compressive residual stress in the
case. Likewise, compressive residual stress
in the case increases as the core carbon
content decreases. Increasing case depth
reduces the contribution from the low-car-
bon core in the development of compressive
stress in the case, thereby adversely affect-
ing the fatigue properties (Ref 36).
In actual practice, a maximum compres-
sive stress develops at some distance away
from the surface (Fig 6 and 7). This effect
occurs because of the presence of retained
austenite, the extent of which depends on
steel composition, carbon content of the
case, quenching temperature, and severity
of quench. According to Koistinen (Ref 38)
and Salonen (Ref 39) the peak compressive
stress takes place at 50 to 60% of the total
case depth corresponding to about 0.5 to
0.6% carbon level, which produces a low
retained austenite content and martensite
hardness around the maximum. Another
factor that might influence this compressive
residual stress profile is that the martensite
formed in the lower-carbon regions of the
case is of the lath type, which also affects
the retained austenite content (Ref 20). The
reversal sign of residual stress takes place at
or near the case/core interface. Later, when
Koistinen's theory was applied to the mea-
sured data, it appeared that the position of
 Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 607

1.0
1000 1830
Distribution of
800 , ~ 1470 residual stresses
+20 +3 c"
o 0.5
600 ~ ~ 1110
8
400 \ ~._ 750

200 " ~ ~ 390

Surface Center -o ,
c.-~_
0 -20 -3
1000 1830 ~ o

800 ~ ~ 1470 m -40 -6

~ Center Surface ~
•~ +20 +3 "~ Tensile
400 - 750 X "o m
E E •"o .-
"~ o o
200 390
er 30 mm
0 Surfacel -20 diam -3 .9_
tt-
1000 1830

800 ( 1470 Center Surface

+20 [ +3 Compressive

600 ~.._.... 1110

Distance from the surface
/ 0 0
400 " ' ~-~,........._. 750 Relationship between carbon content, re-
I~/0 mm Fig 6 tained austenite, and residual stress pattern. It
-20 ~¢ diam -3 shows the development of peak compressive stress
some distance away from the surface. Source: Ref 20
Center Surface
nter
0 + = Tensile stresses
1 10 100 103 - = Compressive stresses strength, which permits the application of
Time, s significantly higher stresses than could nor-
mally be possible in fatigue loading. As in
(a) (b)
the carburizing practice, the surface com-
(a) Continuous cooling transformation diagrams of DIN 22CrMo44 steel showing austenitic decompo- pressive residual stresses are usually found
Fig 5 sition with the superimposed cooling curves of the surface and center during water quenching of round to increase, with depth below the surface
bars of varying dimensions. (b) The corresponding residual stress pattern developed because of thermal and
transformational volume changes. Source: Ref 34, 35
(Ref 45) (Fig 9, Ref 44). A fairly sharp
transition to a tensile state takes place near
the hardness drop-off between the case and
maximum compressive stress depends on trocarburizing, a (macro-) compressive re- unhardened surrounding material. With an
severity of quenching, total case depth, sidual stress is produced in the compound increase in distance from the steep transi-
steel hardenability, and so forth (Ref 21, layer and gamma prime phase (Ref 41). tion, the tensile condition gradually fades
40). Figure 7 shows the details of generation When nitrocarburized parts are rapidly away toward zero stress (Ref 44). In induc-
of axial stress distribution of a carburized quenched, the above properties are further tion hardening, an increase in hardenability
gear (made from deeper hardening steel) enhanced (Ref 42). changes the depth at which transition from
during quenching. In the early stages, the In borided steel processed at 900 °C (1650 compressive to tensile stress occurs. The
contour lines of equal stress were largely °F), a high compressive residual stress is increase in the rate of heating produces an
unaffected by the surface profile. Later a developed at the surface layers (Fig 8), increase in the maximum compressive and
zone of high compressive stress distribution which consists of FeB and Fe2B phases (Ref tensile residual stresses without affecting
occurred in the central portion of the teeth, 43); this is attributed to the lower thermal the mode of stress distribution (Ref 46).
which remained until the end of the quench expansion coefficient and the larger specific Residual Stress in Other ProcessingSteps.
(Ref 37). volume in a borided layer compared to that As welding progresses, the temperature dis-
In nitriding, like carburizing, a compres- in a ferrite matrix (Ref 18, 43). tribution in the weldment becomes nonuni-
sive residual stress is set up in the surface In an induction-hardened steel part, a form and varying as a result of localized
layers. High-temperature nitriding produces compressive surface residual stress is pro- heating of the weldment by the welding heat
a little relaxation of stresses, whereas low- duced when wear-resistant hard martensite source. During the welding cycle, compris-
temperature nitriding imparts a maximum (with slightly lower density) is formed on ing heating and cooling, complex strains
residual stress. In nitrocarburizing, im- the surface of a section concurrently with develop in the weld metal and adjacent
provement in residual surface compressive volume expansion while nonhardened core areas. As a result, appreciable residual
stress and fatigue strength depends on the remains essentially unchanged (Fig 9) (Ref stresses remain after the completion of
hardness and depth of diffusion zone. These 44, 45). The magnitude of the compressive welding. Since the weld metal and heat-
properties, in turn, decrease with increasing stress, which is affected by both thermal affected zone contract on cooling (Fig 10a),
carbon and alloy content (that is, increased contraction and martensite formation, may they are restrained by the cool adjacent
hardenability). During quenching, after ni- be a considerable fraction of the yield part. This produces tensile residual stress in
608 / Process and Quality Control Considerations

Carburized SNC815 Distance from surface, in.

300 0 0.002 0.004 0.006
0300 -900 500
-900 -600 60~j -600
-- 50

i
l
3OO 0 /xA z, /x A 0
Gz = 2 0 0 M P a -600 0 z~ ~
0 #_ - -50
100 ~ -300 -500
- -100

( ~100 -1000 ~ • -150 ~

~ o
--200 "~
'~ -1500 • (b
© FeB - -250 rr
300 300 • • Fe2B
-2000 0 0 /x Ferrite - -300
0
-2500
600 0 0.05 0.10 0.15
Distance from surface, mm
Residual stress distribution of FeB and Fe2B
Fig 8 layers in borided steel processed at 900 °C
t= 3 s 30 s 60 s (1650 °F). Source: Ref 18, 43

Fig 7 Axial stress distribution (given in MPa) in carburized gear during quenching process. Source: Ref 37
the weldment region and compressive resid-
ual stress in the surrounding base metal
region (Fig 10b).
In general, a steep residual stress gradient
is developed because of the steep tendency
of the thermal gradient. This may, in turn,
lead to hot cracking (between columnar
grains) or severe center line cracking in the
weld area (Ref 48). Catastrophic failures of
welded bridges and all-welded ships are
mostly attributed to the existence of large
and dangerous tensile residual stress in
them (Ref 49).
The grinding step in manufacturing is
important, since it is always utilized to
produce the finished surface. It has been
shown that gentle surface grinding, using a
soft sharp wheel and slow downfeed, pro-
duces compressive residual stress at the
surface, whereas conventional (normal
practice) and abrasive grinding result in
surface tensile stresses of very high magni-
tude (Fig l l) (Ref 22, 50). However, the
alloys, and so on, a significant amount of
thermal stress is generated during quench-
gentle grinding method is expensive from ing prior to precipitation hardening. The
the viewpoint of operating time and wear of quenching process in this condition does
the wheel. not invariably involve a phase change; rath-
As a result of temperature gradient during er, this is confined to the postquenching
cooling, castings develop compressive stress- aging treatment. In other nonferrous alloys
es at the surface and tensile stresses in the such as uranium and titanium alloys, the
interior (Ref 22). However, transient temper- final structural condition is not obtained by
ature gradient and phase transformation oc- a slow cool.
curring during the early stages of solidifica- When high-strength titanium alloy is
tion and cooling of continuous steel castings quenched from a solution annealing temper-
in the mold may give rise to the development ature of 850 to 1000 °C (1560 to 1830 °F), it
of harmful residual stresses leading to the develops large residual stress caused by
formation of cracks (Ref 51). poor thermal conductivity of titanium lead-
Chemical processes such as electroplat- ing to high-temperature gradient. This prob-
ing, scale formation, and corrosion of met- lem can, however, be avoided by stress-
als can produce residual stresses due to relief annealing at 650 to 700 °C (1200 to
coherency strains arising from the matching 1290 °F), which produces a slight reduction
tendency of crystal structures of the outer in mechanical properties. When a high-
surface product with the crystal structure of strength aluminum age-hardening alloy is
the adjacent layer (Ref 22). Residual stress- rapidly quenched from the solution temper-
es are also introduced when heat-treated
parts are subjected to successive heating
and cooling cycles during service condi- Depth below surface, mil
tions. 3.15 6.3 9.45 12.6
Residual Stress in the Heat-Treated Non- 800 120

400 (58)
Distance from surface, in.
0.08 0.16 0.24 0.32 0.40
8O
ferrous Alloys. In nonferrous alloys, notably
age-hardenable aluminum alloys, copper- 600
/\. - 9O
500 gm Knoop test beryllium alloys, certain nickel-base super- A
3 m m case I o g_g L~
I I Is ss
A
r~ - 60
200 (29) 60 -r- ~: 400
#_ Residual stress
\ %
-- Abrasive

\
Compression Tension 30
"~ 200
0 40 ~ Conventional

r,~ o 0
-%
-200 (-29) 20 ,~ i i i i i i i i i i I i i ~

/ Hardness - Gentle ,-, . . . .

tr
u,l ~. - 2 0 0 - -30
Yl E
-400 (-58) 0 o
2 4 6 8 10 12 (a) -400 -60
(b)
0 80 160 240 320
Distance from surface, m m
Fig 10 (a) The transverse shrinkage occurring in Depth below surface, pm
F i g 9 A typical hardriess and residual stress profile butt weldments. (b) Longitudinal residual
in induction-hardened (to 3 ram, or 0.12 in., stress patterns in the weldment and surrounding re- Residual stress distribution after gentle, con-
case depth) and tempered (at 260 °C, or 500 °F) 1045 gions. This also shows longitudinal shrinkage in a butt F i g 1 1 ventional, and abrasive grinding of hard-
steel. Source: Ref 44 weld. Source: Ref 47 ened 4340 steel. Source: Ref 22
 Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 609
Table 6 A compiled summary of the maximum residual stresses in surface heat-treated
steels
Residual stress (longitudinal)
Steel Heat treatment MPa ksi
832M13 (type) Carburized at 970 °C (1780 °F) to 1 mm (0.04 in.) case with
0.8% surface carbon
Direct-quenched 280 40.5
Direct-quenched, - 8 0 °C ( - 110 °F) subzero treatment 340 49.0
Direct-quenched, - 9 0 °C (-130 °F) subzero treatment, 200 29.0
tempered
805A20 Carburized and quenched 240-340(a) 35.0--49.0
805A20 Carburized to 1.1-1.5 mm (0.043-0.06 in.) case at 920 °C 190-230 27.5-33.5
(1690 °F), direct oil quench, no temper
805A ! 7 400 58
805A17 Carburized to 1.1-1.5 mm (0.043-0.06 in.) case at 920 °C 150-200 22-29
(1690 °F), direct oil quench, tempered 150 °C (300 °F)
897M39 Nitrided to case depth of about 0.5 mm (0.02 in.) 400--600 58.0-87.0
905M39 800-1000 116.0-145.0
Cold-rolled steel Induction hardened, untempered 1000 145.0
Induction hardened, tempered 200 °C (390 °F) 650 94.0
Induction hardened, tempered 300 °C (570 °F) 350 51
Induction hardened, tempered 400 °C (750 °F) 170 24.5
(a) Immediately subsurface, that is. 0.05 mm (0.002 in.). Source: Ref 29
ature, high thermal and residual stresses are called the dissection method, and the non-
induced due to high coefficient of expansion destructive methods comprising mainly
of aluminum. Uphill quenching from liquid x-ray diffraction, neutron diffraction, ultra-
nitrogen temperature ( - 196 °C, or - 320 °F) sonic, and magnetic methods.
in a steam blast alleviates this problem. This Destructive (or Dissection) Method. This
induces stresses opposite in sign to those method is old but reasonably accurate,
developed on water quenching from the practically nondestructive, uses well-estab-
solutionizing and cancels out their effect. lished methods, and can be employed in
This is followed by aging of the alloy in the confined situations at site (Ref 53). Howev-
conventional manner (Ref 29). er, it is tedious, time consuming, and expen-
Fast polyalkylene glycol (PAG) quench- sive (Ref 54). The other drawbacks are the
ing of solution-treated aluminum alloys destructive, or at best semidestructive na-
tends to reduce residual stress levels be- ture of the method, and its ability to mea-
cause of its more uniform heat extraction sure only the macroresidual stresses. The
rate (thermal shock is smaller, and thereby hole-drilling method is used extensively for
machining is less likely to produce further measuring residual stresses, which depends
distortion), thereby helping solve major and on the dissection approach. It consists of
long-standing distortion problems among the mounting of strain gages or a three-
aluminum workpieces (Ref 52). element strain-gage rosette on the surface
and measurement of strains. Then a rigidly
Control of Residual Stresses in guided milling cutter is used to drill a small,
Heat-Treated Parts straight, circular, perpendicular, and fiat-
Table 6 lists some typical values of max- bottomed hole not exceeding 3.2 mm (0.125
imum residual stresses developed in the in.) at the center of the rosette and into the
surface-hardened steels that have been re- surface of the component being analyzed.
ported in the literature (Ref 29). It is worth Strain redistribution occurring at the sur-
noting that there is a marked influence of face in the surrounding area of the hole
tempering on the residual stress level. Tem- (resulting from the residual stress relief) is
pering must be accomplished at about 150 then measured with the previously installed
°C (300 °F) to maintain 50 to 60% retention strain gages. The residual stress is calculat-
of the residual stress level obtained after ed at a large number of points in a surface
quenching because a higher tempering tem- from the strain measurements using the
perature greatly reduces surface compres- well-established method (Ref 22, 28). To
sive stresses. However, a higher stress- minimize the introduction of spurious
relief temperature (-600 °C, or 1110 °F) is strains by the grinding operation, the rate of
used for mechanically deformed compo- metal removal should be less than 3.125 x
nents (for example, hot-rolled bars) or com- 10-4 m/s (1.23 × 10-2 in./s), and readings
ponents with tensile surface residual stress- are recorded after 15 min of the end of the
es. Alternatively, serious residual tensile grinding process to ensure that any heat
stresses may be avoided effectively by gen- generated has been dissipated (Ref 55).
tle grinding of the surface. Nondestructive Methods. The main diffi-
culty with the nondestructive methods is that
Measurement of Residual Stresses measurements of crystallographic lattice pa-
There are two methods of measuring re- rameters, ultrasonic velocities, or magnetiza-
sidual stresses: the destructive method, also tion changes are made that are indirectly
related to the residual stress. The above
quantities are usually dependent on the stress
and material parameters (such as metallurgi-
cal textures), which are difficult to quantify
(Ref 54, 56).
The x-ray diffraction method is the well-
established technique for measuring both
macro- and microresidual stress nondestruc-
tively. In most instances, the x-ray diffraction
method has been employed to provide quan-
titative values for residual stress profiles in
surface or fully hardened components (Ref
57). This technique depends on the determi-
nation of lattice strains and the stress-induced
differences in the lattice spacing. Macroresid-
ual strain is measured from the shift of dif-
fraction lines in the peak position using the
so-called nonlinear SinZC method from which
residual stress is calculated (Ref 57). For the
measurement of microstrain the Voigt single-
line method is applied (Ref 58). Precision in
lattice strain measurement of the order of
0.2% is possible.
Portable x-ray diffraction equipment is
now commercially available in various
forms that allow stress measurement to be
made very quickly (ranging from 4 to 30 s).
The main drawbacks are that it cannot be
applied to noncrystalline materials such as
plastics, and it is only capable of measuring
residual stresses of materials very close to
the surface under examination. That is, the
measurement is purely surface related (a
depth of 0.01 mm, or 0.4 mil, is commonly
quoted) (Ref 59).
Neutron radiography or diffraction, used
for polycrystalline materials, has a much
deeper penetration than x-rays, but has
major safety problems and the disadvantage
of being nonportable.
Ultrasonic method for evaluating residual
stress involves ultrasonic stress birefrin-
gence or sonoelasticity; this depends upon
the linear variation of the velocities of
sound in a body (that is, ultrasonic waves)
with the stress. This method has the poten-
tial for greater capability, versatility, and
usefulness in the future (Ref 53, 56). How-
ever, this has the disadvantage, in common
with the magnetic methods, that it requires
transducers shaped to match the surface
being inspected (Ref 60).
The magnetic method is based on the
stress dependence of the Barkhausen noise
amplitude. Each time an alternating mag-
netic field induced in a ferromagnetic mate-
rial is reversed, it generates a burst of
Barkhausen noise. The peak amplitude of
the burst, as determined with an inductive
coil near the surface of the component
material, varies with the surface stress lev-
el. Since Barkhausen noise depends on
composition, texture, and work hardening,
it is necessary in each application to use
calibrated standard (reference) samples
with the same processing history and com-
position as the component being analyzed.
This method is used to measure residual
610 / Process and Quality Control Considerations
stresses well below the yield strength of the
ferromagnetic materials. This method is
rapid, and the measurements are made with
the commercially available portable equip-
ment. However, this method is limited to
only ferromagnetic materials (Ref 56).
Thermal evaluation for residual stress anal-
ysis (TERSA) is a new nondestructive meth-
od that is in an experimental stage. It has the
advantage that it is completely independent,
remote, and noncontacting. It consists of
merely directing a controlled amount of ener-
gy from a laser energy source into the volume
of the material being inspected and then mak-
ing a precise determination of changes in the
resulting temperature rise by infrared radiom-
etry. However, the working instrument will
also require some form of display to enable
visual examination to be made of any high-
stressed regions (Ref 60).
Quench Cracking
Anything that produces excessive
quenching stress is the basic cause of crack-
ing. Quench cracking is mostly intergranu-
lar, and its formation may be related to
some of the same factors that cause inter-
granular fracture in overheated and burned
steels. The main reasons for cracking in
heat treatment are: part design, steel
grades, part defects, heat-treating practice,
and tempering practice (Ref 61).
Part Design. Features such as sharp cor-
ners, the number, location, and size of holes,
deep keyways, splines, and abrupt changes in
section thickness within a part (that is, badly
unbalanced section) enhance the crack for-
mation because while the one (thin) area is
cooling quickly in the quenchant, the other
(thick) area immediately adjacent to it is cool-
ing very slowly. One solution to this problem
is to change the material so that a less drastic
quenchant (for example, oil) can be em-
ployed. An alternate solution is to prequench,
that is, to cool it prior to the rest of the part.
This will produce an interior of the hole or
keyway that is residually stressed in compres-
sion, which is always desirable for better
fatigue properties (Ref 61). The third solution
is a design change, and the fourth is to use a
milder quenchant.
Steel Grades. Sometimes this can be
checked by means of a spark test, whereas at
other times a chemical analysis must be
made. In general, the carbon content of steel
should not exceed the required level; other-
wise, the risk of cracking will increase. The
suggested average carbon contents for water,
brine, and caustic quenching are given below:
Method Shape Carbon, %
Induction hardening Complex 0.33
Simple 0.50
Furnace hardening Complex 0.30
Simple 0.35
Very simple, such
as bar 0.40
A decrease in carbon content from 0.72 to
0.61% has been shown to slightly increase
the thermal crack resistance of rim-
quenched railroad wheels (Ref 62).
Because of segregation of carbon and
alloying elements, some steels are more
prone than others to quench cracking.
Among these steels, 4140H, 4145H, 4150H,
and 1345H appear to be the worst. A good
option is to replace the 4100 series with the
8600 series. An additional disadvantage
with the use of 1345H steel is the manga-
nese floating effect, which leads to very
high manganese content in the steel rolled
from the last ingot in the same heat. Simi-
larly, dirty steels (that is, steels with more
than 0.05% S, for example, AISI 1141 and
1144) are more susceptible to cracking than
the low-sulfur grades. The reasons for this
are that they are more segregated in alloying
elements, the surface of this hot-rolled high-
sulfur steel has a greater tendency to form
seams, which act as stress raisers during
quenching, and they are usually coarse
grained (for better machinability), which
increases brittleness and therefore pro-
motes cracking. If these high-sulfur grades
are replaced by calcium-treated steels or
cold-finished leaded steels, this problem
can be obviated (Ref 61).
Part Defects. Surface defect or weakness
in the material may also cause cracking, for
example, deep surface seams or nonmetallic
stringers in both hot-rolled and cold-fin-
ished bars. Other defects are inclusions,
stamp marks, and so forth. For large-seam
depths, it is advisable to use turned bars or
even magnetic particle inspection. The forg-
ing defects in small forgings, such as seams,
laps, flash line, or shearing crack, as well as
in heavy forgings, such as hydrogen flakes
and internal ruptures, aggravate cracking.
Similarly, some casting defects, for exam-
ple, in water-cooled castings, promote
cracking (Ref 50).
Heat-Treating Practice. Higher austenitiz-
ing temperatures increase the tendency
toward quench cracking. Similarly, steels
with coarser grain size are more prone to
cracks than fine-grain steels because the
latter possess more grain-boundary area to
stop the movements of cracks, and grain
boundaries help to absorb and redistribute
residual stresses. An outstanding contribu-
tor to severe cracking is improper heat-
treating practice, for example, nonuniform
heating and nonuniform cooling of the com-
ponent involved in the heat-treatment cy-
cle. It is a good heat-treating practice to
anneal alloy steels prior to the hardening
treatment (or any other high-temperature
treatment, for example, forging, welding,
and so forth) because this produces grain-
refined microstructure and relieves stresses
(Ref 63).
Water-Hardening Steel. The water-hard-
ening steels are most susceptible to cracks if
they are not handled properly. Soft spots
(
Typical appearance of thumbnail check as
Fig 1 2 soft spot onchipping chisel. Source:Ref 64
are most likely to occur in the water-hard-
ening steels, especially where the tool is
grabbed with tongs for quenching. Normal-
ly the cleaned surface shows adequate hard-
ening and the scaled surface insufficient
hardening, which can be examined with a
file. Soft spots may occur from the use of
fresh water, or water contaminated with oil
or soap. Most large tools emerging from
hardening operations contain some soft
spots. However, accidental soft spots in the
wrong place should be investigated, and
steps must be taken to eliminate them.
Figure 12 shows the typical appearance of
a thumbnail check as soft spot on chipping
chisels, which occurs on the bit near the
cutting edge. The cracks enclosing the soft
spots should be avoided by switching to
brine quench (Ref 64).
Air-Hardening Steel. Similarly, when air
hardening steels are improperly handled,
they are likely to crack. For example,
avoidance of tempering treatment or use of
oil quenching in air-hardening steel can lead
to cracking. However, the common practice
in the treatment of air-hardening steels is
initially to quench in oil until "black"
(about 540 °C, or 1000 °F), followed by air
cooling to 65 °C (150 °F) prior to tempering.
As compared to air cooling right from the
quenching temperature, this practice is to-
tally safe and minimizes the formation of
scale.
Polymer quenchants have found well-es-
tablished use in the quenching of solution-
treated aluminum alloys, hardening of plain
carbon steels with less than 0.6% C, spring
steels, boron steels, hardenable stainless
steels, and all carburizing and alloy steels
with section thickness greater than about 50
mm (2 in.), through-hardening and carbur-
izing steel parts, and induction and flame-
hardening treatments because of their nu-
merous beneficial effects, including
elimination of soft spots, distortion, and
cracking problems associated with trace

Fig 13 Microcracking in a Ni-Cr steel. Source: Ref 67
water contamination in quenching oils (Ref
65).
Agitation is an important parameter in
polymer quenching applications both to en-
sure a uniform polymer film around the
quench part and to provide a uniform heat
extraction from the hot part to the adjacent
area of quenchant by preventing a buildup
of heat in the quench region.
Salt bath cooling of induction-hardened
complex-shaped cast iron parts reduces
danger of cracking, which is usually expe-
rienced when air cooling followed by hot-
water quenching is used (Ref 66).
Decarburized Steel. Decarburization usu-
ally arises from insufficient protection as a
result of plant failure (for example, defec-
tive furnace or container seals, defective
valves), poor process control (for example,
insufficient atmosphere-monitoring equip-
ment, poor supervision), or the existence of
decarburizing agents in the furnace atmo-
sphere (for example, CO2, water vapor, and
Hz in the Endogas (Ref 61, 67).
A partially decarburized surface on the
part occurring during tool hardening also
contributes to cracking because martensite
transformation is completed therein well
before the formation of martensite in the
core. Decarburized surface on the tools has
reduced hardness, which will lead to prema-
ture wear and scuffing. Partial decarburiza-
Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 611
4.7 ~m
tion must be avoided, especially on all deep-
hardening steels, either by providing some
type of protective atmosphere during the
heating operation, stock removal by grind-
ing, or carbon restoration process. In addi-
tion to protective atmosphere, salt baths,
inert packs, or vacuum furnaces may be
used to obtain the desired surface chemistry
on the tools or dies. The fact that the better
and more consistent performance of the
tools is observed after regrinding reveals
the existence of partial decarburization re-
maining.
Carburized Alloy Steel. Two types of
peculiar cracking phenomena prevail in the
carburized and hardened case of the car-
burized alloy steels: microcracking and tip
cracking. Microcracking of quenched
steels are small cracks appearing across or
alongside martensite plate (Fig 13) (Ref 67)
and the prior austenite grain boundaries
(Ref 68). They form mostly on those
quenched steel parts that contain chromi-
um and/or molybdenum as the major alloy-
ing elements with or without nickel con-
tent and where the hardening is done by
direct quenching.
Microcracks are observed mostly in
coarse-grained structures, such as large
martensite plates. This is presumably be-
cause of more impingements of the larger
plates of martensite by other large plates.
Another cause of microcracking is the in-
creased carbon content of martensite (that
is, increased hardenability), which is a func-
tion of austenitizing temperature and/or
time (Ref 67). This finding was established
for 8620H steel, which has a higher austen-
itizing temperature prior to quenching
where there is a greater tendency to micro-
crack (Ref 69). This problem can be avoided
by selecting a steel with less hardenability
(that is, with less austenitizing tempera-
ture). Another solution is to change the
heat-treating cycle to carburizing, slow
cooling to black temperature, reheating to,
for example, 815 or 845 °C (1500 or 1550 °F),
and quenching (Ref 61). Microcracking in
case-hardened surfaces may be aggravated
by the existence of hydrogen, which tends
to absorb during carburizing. However, this
hydrogen-enhanced microcracking can be
eliminated by tempering the carburized
parts at 150 °C (300 °F) immediately after
quenching. Tempering exhibits an addition-
al beneficial effect in that it has the ability to
heal the microcracks due to the volume
changes and associated plastic flow that
develop during the first stage of tempering
(Ref 70). No adverse report on the influence
of microcracks on the mechanical proper-
ties has been noted; however, the control-
ling factors should be varied so as to keep
the incidence of microcracks to a minimum
(Ref 67).
Tip cracking refers to the cracking that
appears in the teeth of carburized and
quenched gears and runs partly or fully to
the ends of the teeth in a direction parallel
to the axis of the part. Many heat treaters
have solved this problem to a great extent
by decreasing the carbon content and case
depth to the minimum acceptable design
level or by copper plating the outer diame-
ter of the gear blank prior to hobbing (Ref
66).
Nitrided Steels. The nitrided cases are
very brittle. Consequently, cracking may
occur in service prior to realizing any im-
proved wear and galling resistance. This
can be avoided by a proper tool design, for
example, incorporating all section .changes
with a minimum radius of 3 mm (0.125 in.).
Tempering Practice. The longer the time
the steel is kept at a temperature between
room temperature and 100 °C (212 °F) after
the complete transformation of martensite
in the core, the more likely the occurrence
of quench cracking. This arises from the
volumetric expansion caused by isothermal
transformation of retained austenite into
martensite.
There are two tempering practices that
lead to cracking problems: tempering too
soon after quenching, that is, before the
steel parts have transformed to martensite
in hardening, and skin tempering, usually
observed in heavy sections (=>50 mm, or 2
in., thick in plates and >75 mm, or 3 in., in
diameter in round bars).
612 / Process and Quality Control Considerations
It is the normal practice to temper imme-
diately after the quenching operations. In
this case, some restraint must be exercised,
especially for large sections (>75 mm, or 3
in.) in deep-hardening alloy steels. The rea-
son is that the core has not yet completed its
transformation to martensite with the ex-
pansion, whereas the surface and/or projec-
tions, such as flanges, begin to temper with
shrinkage. This simultaneous volume
change produces radial cracks. This prob-
lem can become severe if rapid heating
practice (for example, induction, flame,
lead, or molten salt bath) is used for tem-
pering. Therefore, very large and very intri-
cate tool steel parts should be removed
from the quenching medium, and tempering
should be started while they are slightly
warm to hold comfortably in the bare hands
( - 6 0 °C, or 140 °F).
Skin tempering occurs in heavy section
parts when the final hardness is >360 HB.
This is due to insufficient tempering time
and is usually determined when the surface
hardness falls by 5 or more HRC points
from the core hardness. This cracking often
occurs several hours after the component
has cooled from the tempering temperature
and often runs through the entire cross
section. This problem can be removed by
retempering for 3 h at the original tempering
temperature, which is associated with a
change in hardness of 2 HRC points maxi-
mum (Ref 61).
Distortion in Heat Treatment
Distortion can be defined as an irrevers-
ible and usually unpredictable dimensional
change in the component during processing
from heat treatment and from temperature
variations and loading in service. The term
dimensional change is used to denote
changes in both size and shape (Ref71). The
heat-treatment distortion is therefore a term
often used by engineers to describe an un-
controlled movement that has occurred in a
component as a result of heat-treatment
operation (Ref 72). Although it is recog-
nized as one of the most difficult and trou-
blesome problems confronting the heat
treater and the heat-treatment industries on
a daily basis, it is only in the simplest
thermal heat-treatment methods that the
mechanism of distortion is understood.
Changes in size and shape of tool-steel parts
may be either reversible or irreversible.
Reversible changes, which are produced by
applying stress in the elastic range or by
temperature variation, neither induce
stresses above the elastic limit nor cause
changes in the metallurgical structure. In
this situation, the initial dimensional values
can be restored to their original state of
stress or temperature.
Irreversible changes in size and shape of
tool-steel parts are those that are caused by
stresses in excess of the elastic limit or by
changes in the metallurgical structure (for respectively; the volume increases involved
example, phase changes). These dimension- in the transformation of austenite to pearlite
al changes sometimes can be corrected by in the same steels are 2.4 and 1.33%, re-
mechanical processing to remove extra and spectively. Such volume increases are less
unwanted material or to redistribute resid- in alloy steels and least in 2C-12Cr and A10
ual stresses or by heat treatment (annealing, tool steels. It should be noted that plastic
tempering, or cold treatment). deformation (or strain) occurs during such
When heat-treated parts suffer from dis- transformations at stresses that are lower
tortion beyond the permissible limits, it may than the yield stress for the phases present
lead to scrapping of the article, rendering it (Ref 75). The occurrence of this plastic
useless for the service for which it was deformation, called the transformation plas-
intended, or it may require necessary cor- ticity effect, influences the development of
rection. Allowable distortion limits vary to stresses during the hardening of steel parts
a large extent, depending on service appli- (Ref 76). During quenching from the austen-
cations; in cases where very little distortion ite range, the steel contracts until the M~
can be tolerated, specially desired tool temperature is reached, then expands dur-
steels are used. These steels possess metal- ing martensitic transformation; finally, ther-
lurgical characteristics that minimize distor- mal contraction occurs on further cooling to
tion. room temperature. As the hardening tem-
perature increases, a greater amount of car-
Types of Distortion bide goes into solution; consequently, both
Distortion is a general term that involves the grain size and the amount of retained
all irreversible dimensional change pro- austenite are increased. This also increases
duced during heat-treatment operations. the hardenability of steel.
This can be classified into two categories: More trouble with distortion comes from
size distortion, which is the net change in the quenching or hardening operation than
specific volume between the parent and during heating for hardening, in which the
transformation product produced by phase faster the cooling rate (that is, the more
transformation without a change in geomet- severe the quenching), the greater the dan-
rical form, and shape distortion or warpage, ger of distortion. When the milder quen-
which is a change in geometrical form or chants are used, the extent of distortion is
shape and is revealed by changes of curva- lessened. The severity of quenching thus
ture or curving, bending, twisting, and/or influences the distortion of components.
nonsymmetrical dimensional change with- The dependence of volume increase, par-
out any volume change (Ref 72, 73). Usually ticularly in tools of different dimensions, on
both types of distortion occur during a grain size (or hardenability) is another im-
heat-treatment cycle. portant factor. Variations in volume during
Dimensional Changes Caused by Changes quenching of a fine-grained shallow-harden-
in Metallurgical Structureduring Heat Treat- ing steel in all but small sections is less than
ment. Various dimensional changes pro- a coarse-grained deep-hardening steel of the
duced by a change in metallurgical structure same composition.
during the heat-treatment cycle of tool Tempering. There is a certain correlation
steels are described below (Ref 74). between the tempering temperature and
Heating (Austenitizing). When annealed volume change. Tempering reduces the vol-
steel is heated from room temperature, ther- ume of martensite but not adequately
mal expansion occurs continuously up to enough to equalize completely the prior
Ac~, where the steel contracts as it trans- volume increase as a result of martensitic
forms from body-centered cubic (bcc) fer- transformation unless the components are
rite to face-centered cubic (fcc) austenite. completely softened. In low-alloy and plain
The extent of decrease in volumetric con- (medium- and high-) carbon steels, during
traction is related to the increased carbon the first and third stages of tempering, a
content in the steel composition (Table 4). decrease in volume occurs that is associated
Further heating expands the newly formed with the decomposition of: high-carbon
austenite. martensite into low-carbon martensite plus
Hardening. When austenite is cooled ~-carbide in the former stage, and aggregate
quickly, martensite forms; at intermediate of low-carbon martensite and t-carbide into
cooling rates, bainite forms; and at slow ferrite plus cementite in the latter stage. In
cooling rates, pearlite precipitates. In all the second stage, however, an increase in
these transformation sequences, the magni- volume takes place (due to the decomposi-
tude of expansion increases with the de- tion of retained austenite into bainite) that
crease in carbon content in the austenite tends to compensate for the early volume
(Table 4). The volume increase is maximum reduction. As the tempering temperature is
when austenite transforms to martensite, increased further toward the A~, more pro-
intermediate with lower bainite, and is least nounced volume reduction occurs. In some
with upper bainite and pearlite (Table 4). highly alloyed tool-steel compositions, the
The volume increases associated with the volume changes during martensite forma-
transformation of austenite to martensite in tion are less striking because of the large
1 and 1.5% carbon steels are 4.1 and 3.84%, proportion of retained austenite and the
 Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 613

Table 7 Typical volume percentages of microconstituents existing in four different tool
steels after their standard hardening treatments
Steel Hardening treatment
W1 790 °C (1450 °F), 30 rain; WQ
L3 845 °C (1550 °F), 30 min; OQ
M2 1225 °C (2235 °F), 6 rain; OQ
D2 1040 °C (1900 °F), 30 rain; AC
Note: WQ, water quenched; OQ, oil quenched; AC, air cooled.
resistance to tempering of alloy-rich mar-
tensite. These hardened steels show sharp
increases both in hardness and volume be-
tween 500 and 600 °C (930 and 1110 °F)
owing to the precipitation of very finely
dispersed alloy carbides from the retained
austenite. This produces a depleted matrix
in alloy content, raising the M~ temperature
of retained austenite. During cooling down
from the tempering temperature, further
transformation of retained austenite into
martensite will occur with an additional
increase in volume.
Size Distortion. Table 7 shows the typical
volume percentages of microconstituents
present in four different tool steels after
their standard hardening treatments. Typi-
cal dimensional changes during hardening
and tempering of several tool steels are
given in Table 8. It is apparent here that
some steels such as M3 and M41 high-speed
steels show appreciable increase in size of
about 0.2% after hardening and tempering
between 540 and 595 °C (1000 and 1100 °F)
to produce complete secondary hardening.
Other types, such as A10, expand very little
when hardened and tempered over the en-
tire temperature range up to 595 °C (1100
°F). Excessive size changes in oil-hardening
nonshrinkable tool steel is usually caused
by lack of stress relief (when necessary),
and hardening and/or tempering at the in-
correct temperature. The golden rule is to
learn to be suspicious of tools that are
seriously off size in only one dimension. It
is further noted that alloying addition in
steels brings about a change in the specific
volume of many microconstituents, but to a
Retained
As-quenched Martensite, austenite,
hardness, HRC vol% vol%
67.0 88.5 9 2.5
66.5 90 7 3.0
64 71.5 20
62 45 40
lesser extent than carbon (Ref 77). This
table provides comparative data on size
distortion in a variety of steels; however,
this information cannot be used alone to
predict shape distortion factor.
Shape Distortion or Warpage. This is
sometimes called straightness or angularity
change. It is found particularly in nonsym-
metrical components during heat treatment.
From the practical viewpoints, warpage in
water- or oil-hardening steels is normally of
greater magnitude than is size distortion and
is more of a problem because it is usually
not predictable. This is caused by the sum
effect of more than one of these factors:
• Rapid heating (or overheating), drastic
(or careless) quenching, or nonuniform
heating and cooling causes severe shape
distortion. Slow heating as well as pre-
heating of the parts prior to heating to
the austenitizing temperature yields the
most satisfactory result. Rapid quench-
ing produces thermal and mechanical
stresses associated with the martensitic
transformation. In the case of low- and
high-hardenability steels, respectively,
this problem becomes severe or very
small
• Residual stresses present in the compo-
nent before heat treating. These arise
from machining, grinding, straightening,
welding, casting, spinning, forging, and
rolling operations, which will also furnish
a marked contribution to the shape
change (Ref 78)
• Applied stress causing plastic deforma-
tion. Sagging and creep of the compo-
nents occur during heat treatment as a
result of improper support of components
Undissolved or warped hearth in the hardening fur-
carbides, nace. Hence, large, long, and complex-
vol%
shaped parts must be properly supported
at critical positions to avoid sagging or
preferably are hung with the long axis on
8.5
15 the vertical
• Nonuniform agitation/quenching or non-
uniform circulation of quenchant around
a part results in an assortment of cooling
rates that creates shape distortion (Ref
79). Uneven hardening, with the forma-
tion of soft spots, increases warpage.
Similarly, an increase in case depth, par-
ticularly uneven case depths in case-hard-
ening steels, increases warpage on
quenching (Ref 80)
• Tight (that is, thin and highly adherent)
scale and decarburization, at least in cer-
tain areas. Tight scale is usually a prob-
lem encountered in forgings hardened
from direct-fired gas furnaces having
high-pressure burners. Quenching in ar-
eas with tight scale is extremely retarded
compared to the areas where the scale
comes off. This produces soft spots, and,
in some cases, severe unpredicted distor-
tion. Some heat treaters coat the compo-
nents with a scale-loosening chemical pri-
or to their entry into the furnace (Ref 79).
Similarly, the areas beneath the decarbur-
ized surface do not harden as completely
as the areas below the nondecarburized
surface. The decarburized layer also var-
ies in depth and produces an inconsistent
softer region as compared to the region
with full carbon. All these factors can
cause a condition of unbalanced stresses
with resultant distortion (Ref 79)
• Long parts with small cross sections (>L
= 5d for water quenching, > L = 8d for oil
quenching, and > L = 10d for austemper-
ing, where L is the length of the part, and
d is its diameter or thickness)
• Thin parts with larger areas (>A = 50t,
where A is the area of the part, and t is its
thickness)
• Unevenness of, or greater variation in,
section

Table 8 Typical dimensional changes during hardening and tempering of several tool steels
Hardening treatment
Total change in Total change in linear dimensions~ %, after tempering at
Tool Temperature Quenching linear dimensions 150 *C 205 *C 260 *C 315 *C 370 *C 425 *C 480 *C 510 *C 540 *C 565 *C 595 *C
steel ~U- 1¢ medium after quenching, % 300 *F 400 *F 500 *F 600 *F 700 *F 800 *F 900 *F 950 oF 1000 oF 1050 *F 1100 *F

Ol 815 1500 Oil 0.22 0.17 0.16 0.18 •••

OI 790 1450 Oil 0.18 0.09 0.12 0.13 •-•
06 790 1450 Oil 0.12 0.07 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.00 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07
A2 955 1750 Air 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.07 ••• 0.05 0.04 0.06
A10 790 1450 Air 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02
D2 11)10 1850 Air 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.00 . . . . 0.01 -0.02 0.06
D3 955 1750 Oil 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.01 -0.02
D4 1040 1900 Air 0.07 0.03 0.01 -0.01 -0.03 •• -0.4 -0.03 0.05
D5 1010 1850 Air 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 •' 0.3 0.03 0.05
HII 1010 1850 Air 0.11 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 • • 0.3 0.01 0.12
HI3 1010 1850 Air -0.01 . . . . . 0.00 0.06
M2 1210 2210 Oil -0.02 -0.06 0.10 0.14 0.16
M41 1210 2210 Oil -0.16 -0.17 0.08 0,21 0.23
614 / Process and Quality Control Considerations
Examples of Distortion
Ring Die. Quenching of ring die through
the bore produces the reduction in bore
diameter as a result of formation of martens-
ire, a s s o c i a t e d with the increased volume.
In other words, metal in the bore is upset by
shrinkage of the surrounding metal and is
short when it cools (Ref 24). However,
allover quenching causes the outside diam-
eter to increase and the bore diameter to
increase or decrease, depending upon pre-
cise dimensions of the part. When the out-
side diameter of the steel part is induction-
or flame-hardened (with water quench), it
causes the part to shrink in outer diameter
(Ref 63). These are the examples of the
effect of mode of quenching on distortion
(Ref 81).
Thin die (with respect to wall thickness) is
likely to increase in bore diameter, decrease
in outside diameter, and decrease in thick-
ness when the faces are hardened. If the die
has a very small hole, insufficient quench-
ing of the bore may enlarge the hole diam-
eter because the body of die moves with the
outside hardened portion.
Bore of Finished Gear. Similarly, the bore
of a finished gear might turn oval or change
to such an extent that the shaft cannot be
fitted by the allowances that have been
provided. Even a simple shape such as a
diaphragm or orifice plate may, after heat
treatment, lose its flatness in such a way
that it may become unusable.
Production of Long Pins. In the case of the
production of long pins (250 mm long x 6
mm diameter, or 10 × V4 in.) made from
medium-alloy steel, it was found, after con-
ventional hardening, that when mounted
between centers, the maximum swing was
over 5 mm (0.20 in.). However, the camber
could be reduced to within acceptable limits
by martempering, intense or press quench-
ing.
Hardening and Annealing of Long Bar.
When a 1% carbon steel bar, 300 mm long
(or more) × 25 mm diameter (12 in. long, or
more, × 1 in. diameter), is water quenched
vertically from 780 °C (1435 °F), the bar
increases both in diameter and volume but
decreases in length. When such bars are
annealed or austenitized, they will sag badly
between the widely spaced supports.
Hence, they should be supported along
their entire length in order to avoid distor-
tion.
Hardening of Half-Round Files. Files are
usually made from hypereutectoid steel
containing 0.5% chromium. Files are heated
to 760 °C (1400 °F) in an electric furnace
after being surface coated with powdered
wheat, charcoal, and ferrocyanide to pre-
vent decarburization. They are then
quenched vertically in a water tank. On
their removal from the tank, the files appear
like the proverbial dog's tail. The flat side
has curved down, the camber becomes ex-
cessive, and the files can no longer be used
in service. One practical solution is to give
the files a reverse camber prior to quench-
ing. The dead fiat files could, however, be
made possible, and the judgment with re-
gard to the actual camber needed depends
upon the length and the slenderness of the
recur files (Ref 82).
Similarly, when a long slender shear knife
is heat treated, it tends to curve like a dog's
tail, unless special precautions are taken.
Hardening of Chisels (Ref 63). Chisels
about 460 mm (18 in.) long and made from
13 mm (0.5 in.) AISI 6150 bar steel are
austenitized at 900 °C (1650 °F) for 1.5 h and
quenched in oil at 180 °C (360 °F) by stand-
ing in the vertical position with chisel point
down in special baskets that allow stacking
of two 13 mm (0.5 in.) round chisels per 650
mm 2 (1 infl) hole. Subsequently, hardened
chisels are tempered between 205 and 215
°C (400 and 420 °F) for 1.5 h. These heat-
treated parts show 55 to 57 HRC hardness
but are warped. The reasons for this distor-
tion are:
• The portion of the bar that touches the
basket cools slowly, producing uneven
contraction and thermal stress
• The martensite formation is delayed on
the inner or abutting side of the bar,
causing unequal expansion during trans-
formation. This distortion can be elimi-
nated or minimized by loading the parts in
the screen-basket in such a way that
stacking arrangement permits sufficient
space between each part and by slightly
decreasing the austenitizing temperature
(Ref 62). Distortion can also be mini-
mized by austempering the part, provided
that the carbon content is on the high side
of specification to produce the lower bai-
nitic structure of 55 to 57 HRC. If higher
yield stress is not warranted, only chisel
ends need hardening and subsequent tem-
pering (Ref 63)
Hardening of a Two-Pounder Shot. The
hardness of a two-pounder shot was specified
at 60 HRC on the nose and 35 HRC at the
base. A differential hardening technique was
performed on the shot made of a Ni-Cr-Mo
steel. This technique consisted of quenching
the shot in the ice-cold water by its immersion
in a tank up to the shoulder, followed by
drawing out the water from the tank at a
stipulated rate until the water line reached the
base of the nose. The final step involved
withdrawing the shot from the tank when
completely cold. The back end was then
softened by heating in a lead bath after initial
tempering. The first few shots hardened in
this way were observed to split vertically
across the nose. The failure was, however,
avoided by withdrawal of the shot before
attaining ice-cold temperature and its subse-
quent immersion in warm water (Ref 82).
Hardening of a Burnishing Wheel. In the
manufacture of railway axles, the gearing
surface on which the axle rests in the hous-
ing has to be given a high burnishing polish
employing a circular pressure tool that is
made of !.2C-1.5Cr steel. F o r satisfactory
results, the hardness of the tool surface
should be about 60 HRC. It has been found
that the tool usually cracks before its with-
drawal from the cold-water quenching bath.
This problem may, however, be avoided by
quenching the tool in water for 10 s prior to
transferring it to an oil bath for finish
quenching. Time quenching can be judi-
ciously applied for many heat treatment
problems of distortion or cracking. Stress-
relieving treatment after the use of the tool
for some time may also enhance its perfor-
mance life. As indicated above, martemper-
ing is also one of the solutions for this
problem (Ref 81).
Hardening of Case-Carburized Mild Steel.
If oil-hardening steels are not available for
making a component, mild steel parts are
carburized and water quenched to obtain
the desired hardness, possibly resulting in
excessive distortion, which is very difficult
to straighten without cracking.
Hardening of Carburized Low-Carbon
Steel Rollers. The best course of quenching
carburized En32 steel rollers (25 mm diam
× _->600 mm long, or I in. diam × ->2 ft
long), employed in textile printing, is to roll
them down skids into water-quenching
tanks because this produces less warpage
than when quenched slowly with the bar
either in vertical, horizontal, or inclined
positions. These are the procedures adopt-
ed for hardening of cylinders with length
considerably greater than the diameter.
Hardening of Helix Gears. The distortion
of the helical gears made of IS 20MnCrl
grade steel (similar to AISI 5120) used as
the third speed gear in the gear box of Tara
trucks is an unavoidable natural conse-
quence of the hardening process after car-
burizing. This type of distortion is linked
with increased length and decreased diam-
eter and occasionally increased helical an-
gle (Ref 83). If the extent of distortion can
be controlled, a constant correction to the
helix angle can be imparted in the soft-stage
manufacturing (machining) prior to heat
treatment so that this correction can com-
pensate for the distorted angle and may
result in a gear with desired helix angle.
Thus a constant magnitude of distortion
without minimization is assured in every job
of every batch of production in commercial
manufacturing. However, the residual stress
system and metallurgical properties such as
core strength, case depth, surface hardness,
proper microhardness in the surface regions,
and so forth, are assured (Ref 84). Similarly,
when heavy-duty tooth gear is gas carbur-
ized and quenched to harden the surface
layer, the diameter and tooth span increase
and tapering and bending also occur.
Nitriding of Screw. A rolling mill screw,
after liquid nitriding, may also show a small

decrease in length, which causes pitch er-
rors in the screws (Ref 83).
Induction and Flame Hardening of Spur
Gears. Spur gears, after induction and flame
hardening, exhibit increased circular pitch,
the error being maximum for the tooth
groove quenched first. Similarly, in line-
heating process, the thin plate undergoes
convex bending and the thick plate concave
bending (Ref 83).
Precautions
Inadequate support during the heat-treat-
ment cycle, poorly designed jigs and quench-
ing fixtures, or incorrect loading of the parts
may cause distortion (Ref 73). In general,
plain-carbon and low-alloy steels have such a
low yield strength at the hardening tempera-
ture that the parts are capable of distorting
under their own weight. Every care, there-
fore, must be taken to ensure that parts are
carefully supported or suspended during heat-
ing; long parts are preferably heated in a
vertical furnace or with the length in the
vertical plane (Ref 85). They should be
quenched in the vertical position with vertical
agitation of the quenchants. Also, it must be
remembered that many tool steels are spoiled
by failure to provide enough support when
they are taken out from the furnace for
quenching. Thus, every precaution is taken to
ensure that parts are adequately supported
during entire heat treatment by employing
well-designed jigs, fixtures, and so on.
Other precautions to minimize distortion
include:
• Tool steels should be heated to hardening
temperature slowly, or in steps, and uni-
formly. Hot salt baths are used to render
fast, uniform heat input
• It is best to heat small sections to the
lower region of the recommended hard-
ening temperature range and to heat large
sections at the higher temperature range.
Overheating by employing too high a tem-
perature or too long a heating time must
be avoided
• It is a good practice to protect the surface
of the component from decarburization
(by packing it in cast iron chips or using a
vacuum furnace, for example). If a sepa-
rate preheating furnace is not available,
the part can be put in a cold furnace, after
which the temperature is raised to proper
preheating temperature and kept at that
temperature to attain uniform heating
throughout, prior to proceeding to the
hardening temperature (Ref 86)
• With the slower cooling rate, which is
consistent with good hardening practice,
a lower thermal gradient will be devel-
oped, thereby producing less distortion
• Thus rapid heating and cooling rates of
irregularly shaped parts must be avoided
• Proper selection of quenchant with desir-
able quenching properties and adequate
Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 615
agitation during hardening must be provid-
ed
Methods of Preventing Distortion
(Ref 82, 87)
Straightening is one method to remove or
minimize distortion. Since straightening (af-
ter hardening) can largely relieve the desir-
able residual compressive stresses (in plain-
carbon and low-alloy steels) that may cause
breakage, it would be better to accomplish
this before the steel cools below the Ms
temperature, that is, when the steel is in the
metastable austenitic state (Ref 35). This
temperature is above 260 °C (500 °F) for
most tool steels and is preferably about 400
°C (750 °F) for long shear knives, which are
usually made of 2C-12Cr steel. Warping on
parts such as shafts and spindles can be
corrected by straightening during or after
hardening, followed by grinding to size (Ref
84). Mostly high-alloy steels are straight-
ened after hardening due to the higher per-
centage of retained austenite and their com-
paratively low yield stress. Straightening
also can be accomplished during the tem-
pering process (Ref 35). However, straight-
ening of hardened parts with higher strength
will cause a loss of fatigue properties and
possibly initiation of cracks at the surface.
Hence, straightening after the hardening
treatment must be very carefully controlled
and should be followed by a low-tempera-
ture tempering treatment.
The case-hardened (for example, nitrided,
carburized) parts can be straightened to a
very large extent as a result of their lower
core hardness. Nitrided parts may be straight-
ened at 400 °C (750 °F) (Ref 35).
Support and Restraint Fixtures. Fixtures
for holding finished parts or assemblies dur-
ing heat treatment may be either support or
restraint type. For alloys that are subjected
to very rapid cooling from the solution-
treatment temperature, it is common prac-
tice to use minimum fixturing during solu-
tion treatment and to control dimensional
relations by using restraining fixture during
aging. Support fixtures are used when re-
straint type is not needed or when the part
itself renders adequate self restraint. Long
narrow parts are very easily fixtured by
hanging vertically. Asymmetrical parts may
be supported by placing on a tray of sand or
a ceramic casting formed to the shape of the
part (Ref 64). Restraint fixtures may require
machined grooves, plugs, or clamps. Some
straightening of parts can be accomplished
in aging fixtures by forcing and clamping
slightly distorted parts into the fixture. The
threaded fasteners for clamping should not
be used because they are difficult to remove
after heat treatment. It is preferable to use a
slotted bar held in place by a wedge (Ref
64). The bore of a hub, the most important
dimension in the hardening of thin spur
gears, can be mechanically plugged to pre-
vent the reduction of the bore and keep the
out-of-roundness close to tolerance limits.
When hardening large hollows, either re-
straining bands on the outside during tem-
pering or articulated fillers serve the same
purpose.
Quenching Fixtures. When water quench-
ing or oil quenching is essential, distortion
can be minimal by employing properly de-
signed quenching fixtures that forcibly pre-
vent the steel from distorting (Ref 88). Fig-
ure 14 shows a typical impingement-type
quenching fixture. The requirements essen-
tial for the better design of this type of
fixture are as follows (Ref 79):
• There must be an accurate positioning of
the part in the fixture. Whenever possi-
ble, round bars should be rotated during
quenching to level out variations in jet
pressure around the part
• There should be an unhindered flow of
quenchant through the sufficiently large
holes (3.3 to 6.4 mm, or 0.13 to 0.25 in. in
diameter). Jets as large as 12.25 mm (0.50
in.) in diameter may be employed with
furnace-heated heavy sections (for exam-
ple, plates). A large portion of the excess
quenchant with these large jets is for the
removal of scale (Ref 89)
• Spacing between the holes should be rea-
sonably wide (for example, 4d, where d is
the hole diameter)
• For oil-quenching fixtures, the facility to
submerge the part is required to reduce
fumes and flashing
• There must be the provision for efficient
cleaning of the holes
• A facility must be available to drain out
the hot quenchant for effective quenching
performance with cold quenchant
Pressure quenching is the most efficient
method of cooling parts from elevated tem-
perature by using a combination of high
pressure (such as 5 MPa, or 5 atm) and
turbulent gas flow throughout the entire
surface area of the workload (Ref 90). This
is economical and fast, provides even cool-
ing, offers a unique design and minimum
distortion and improved metallurgical qual-
ities. As a result of these beneficial effects
this is suited to quench large-diameter tool-
ing for the aluminum extrusion industry;
quench larger-diameter carburized gear,
larger fasteners, and precision gears to be
jigged vertically; harden high-speed steel
tools (such as saw blades, dies, and other
parts with edge configuration) and 718 jet
engine compressor blades (Ref 90). This is
also employed to quench (vacuum pro-
cessed) large sections of titanium alloy cast-
ings for aircraft applications (Ref 91). Fig-
ure 15 is a pressure-quench module that
may be attached to vacuum-sealed
quenched and continuous-vacuum furnace
as a replacement for the oil-quench section.
Press quenching is widely employed in
preventing and controlling quench distor-
tion in components where the geometry
 616 / Process and Quality Control Considerations
f during hardening and to avoid cracking re-
In-hi
Planview
Fig 14 A typical impingement-type quenching fixture. Source: Ref 80
renders them particularly prone to distor-
tion (Ref 92). For example, flat circular
diaphragms of spring steel used in the con-
trol or measurement of pressure are press
quenched between two copper blocks,
which cannot be accomplished by direct
quenching (Ref 80).
Rolling Die Quenching. A rolling die
quench machine can provide uniform wa-
ter quenching with minimal distortion for
large-production runs. When a heated part
is placed on the rollers, the die closes and
the rolls turn. This removes any distortion
incurred during heating. According to
manufacturers of rolling die quench ma-
chines, symmetrical parts with the follow-
ing straightness can be achieved in produc-
tion:
Water Heating Mobile
jacket chamber insulating
~ barrier
F - ' . w°rkin . "~ / hR::r~T L/~
Water Sonicvelocity/
jacket
Fig 15 vacuumPressure'quenchfurnaces,
modulesource:
fOrRefattachment90into standard vacuum-sealed quenched and continuous
Oil level treatment just before the final machining
operation, which decreases the distortion to
an appreciable extent. This is of special
importance for intricate parts with closed
dimensional tolerances (Ref 80). Stress re-
duction is necessary to avoid distortion
~--7i
"//'r///
J . # . , / / / /
sulting from the combination of residual
stress to the thermal stress produced during
I I I /
E
l / / x
heating to the hardening temperature. In the
"///"
, 1 1 ,
" /" /
....
i .,, event that stress relieving is not performed
¢ / / I / / / /
after heat treatment, large distortions of the
i / / . , part can be removed by heavy grinding.
, / / I
i / / . ,
However, the drawbacks of this operation
are: possible elimination of most, if not all,
of the hardened case of the carburized and
hardened part; and danger of burning and
• ~'h,/z
crack formation on the surface layers.
Hence, it is customary to stress relieve
SectionA- A plain carbon or low-alloy steel parts at a
temperature of 550 to 650 °C (1020 to 1200
°F) (for I to 2 h), hot-worked and high-speed
steels at 600 to 750 °C (1110 to 1380 °F), and
the heavily machined or large parts at 650
l °C (1200 °F) (for 4 h) prior to final machining
TIR = K - (Eq2) and heat-treatment operations. Subresonant
d
stress relieving may also be employed to
where TIR is the total indicator reading of neutralize thermally induced stress without
straightness, l is the length (in.), d is the changing the mechanical properties or the
diameter (in.), and K is the constant = shape of the component. These components
10-4" include: large workpieces, premachined or
For minimum yield strength requirements finish-machined structural or tubular, non-
of 310 MPa (45 ksi), air-hardened or normal- ferrous, hardened, nonsymmetrical or vary-
ized parts with negligible distortion can be ing section thickness, stationary, or assem-
produced (Ref 79). bled. However, this does not work on
Stress Relieving. The presence of residual copper-rich alloys and the edges of burned
stresses in the parts caused by cold work- plates (Ref 93).
ing, drawing, extrusion, forging, welding,
machining, or heading operations greatly Control of Distortion
increases the tendency of distortion. How- In order to remove or minimize distor-
ever, these residual stresses can be relieved tion, the modern trend is to shift from
by subcriticai annealing or normalizing water-quenching practice to milder quench-
ing, for example, oil quenching, polymer
quenching, martempering, austempering, or
Pressure Heavy-duty Pressure
even air-hardening practice. Milder quen-
lock finned cooling lock
/ chants produce slower and more uniform
cooling of the parts, which drastically re-
duces the potential distortion. Other strate-
gies of controlling distortion for age-harden-
ing aluminum, beryllium, and other alloys
include: alloy and temper selection, fixtur-
ing, age-hardening temperatures, proper
machining, and stamping operations (Ref
Id r .Work'in 1 '-~ "" 94). The fewer the number of reheats ap-
plied to components in case-hardening
steels following carburizing, the smaller is
the distortion on the finished part. When
top priority is given to minimum distortion,
it is desirable to make the parts from oil-
~ L . . . . / .. hardening steels with a controlled grain size
and to harden them by martempering direct
from carburizing. Presently polyalkylene
glycol-base quenchants, such as UCON
Impellerdrive quenchants HT and HT-NN, are variously
used for direct quenching from the forging
treatment, continuous cast quenching, and
usual hardening of forged and cast steels
and cast iron. In this case boiling does not

take place at the component surface but
rather at the external surface of the depos-
ited polymer film. More uniform cooling
occurs, and thermal stresses are released.
Because of the lower boiling point and high
thermal conductivity, UCON quenchants
act through the martensite zone more rap-
idly than oil (Ref 95).
Distortion during ferritic nitrocarburizing
is minimal because of low treatment tem-
perature and the absence of subsequent
phase transformations (Ref 66). There are
many methods of reducing distortion in
induction-hardened components; these
methods are usually found by experience
with variables such as the hardening tem-
perature and the type and temperature of
quenching medium employed. Methods of
reducing distortion in induction-hardened
parts include: the hardening of small spin-
dles held vertically in jigs; the plug-quench-
ing of gears to prevent the bores from
closing in; the flattening of cams by clamp-
ing them together during tempering; and the
selective hardening of complex shapes (Ref
96).
As a replacement of medium- or slow-
quenching oils, UCON quenchants E and
E-NN can be readily used in induction- and
flame-hardening operations, both in spray
and immersion types, for high-carbon and
most alloy steels and traditional hardening
of cast iron and cast or forged steels of
complex geometry with better distortion-
reduction properties. Agitation of quen-
chant should be carried out by motor-driven
stirrers to move the medium with respect to
the part being quenched or by pumps that
force the medium through the appropriate
orifice. Alternatively, the parts are moved
through the medium, and for some applica-
tions, spray quenchant is recommended.
Water additives are sometimes employed in
salt baths to increase heat extraction (Ref
64).
Ultrasonic quenching is also effective in
controlling distortion, which involves the
introduction of ultrasonic energy (waves
with a frequency of 25 kHz) in the quench-
ing bath. This breaks down the vapor film
that surrounds the part in the initial stages
of water or oil quenching (Ref 86).
Distortion after Heat Treatment
Straightening. When every possible case
has been employed to minimize distortion,
it may still be essential to straighten after
heat treatment, which has already been
discussed.
Grinding after Heat Treatment. In the
case of carburized or nitrided parts, the
metallurgist and designer, together with the
production engineer, must collaborate re-
garding the amount to be removed by grind-
ing after heat treatment. This grinding al-
lowance must be taken into account when
determining the initial dimensions and also
Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 617
when specification for the case depth is to
be applied.
Distortion may also occur after heat treat-
ment, with time, owing to the completion of
any unfinished transformation or the effect
of increased temperature during grinding.
For example, fully hardened components
such as blade shears may be damaged by
characteristic crazing pattern because of
heavy and careless grinding. Local over-
heating results in the transformation of un-
decomposed austenite, and the accompany-
ing changes in volume produce sufficient
stresses to cause cracking and developing of
a crazing pattern.
Dimensional Stability. To achieve dimen-
sional stabilization or stability (that is, re-
tention of their exact size and shape) over
long periods, which is a vital requirement
for gages and test blocks, the amount of
retained austenite in heat-treated parts must
be reduced because retained austenite slow-
ly transforms and produces distortion when
the material is kept at room temperature,
heated, or subjected to stress. Dimensional
stabilization also reduces internal (residual)
stress, which causes distortion in service.
Stabilization can be obtained by multiple
tempering (with prolonged tempering
times); the first tempering reduces internal
stress and facilitates its transformation to
martensite on cooling. The second and third
retempering reduce the internal stress pro-
duced during the transformation of retained
austenite.
It is the usual practice to carry out a
single or repeated cold treatment after the
initial tempering treatment. In cold treat-
ment, the part is cooled below the Mf,
which will cause the retained austenite to
transform to martensite; the extent of trans-
formation depends on whether the tool part
is untempered or first tempered. Cold treat-
ment is normally accomplished in a refrig-
erator at a temperature of -70 to -95 °C
(-100 to -140 °F). Tools must be retem-
pered immediately after return to room tem-
perature following cold treatment in order
to reduce internal stress and increase the
toughness of the fresh martensite. Finally,
they are ground to size. It may be pointed
out that vibratory techniques are being used
more frequently to achieve dimensional sta-
bility but do not offer any metallurgical
benefits (Ref 80),
Distortion and Its Control in
Heat-Treated Aluminum Alloys
The high levels of residual stress and
distortion that are produced in the water-
quenched aluminum extrusion and forgings
(such as 2000, 6000, and 7000 series) and
aluminum castings can be reduced 60 to
100% by using proper selection of polyalky-
lene glycol quenchant or polyvinyl pyrroli-
done 90 concentration (for example, 25%
solutions for wrought alloys, 20 to 30%
UCON quenchant A for thicknesses up to
25 mm (1 in.), and 17 to 22% for larger than
25 mm (1 in.) section thicknesses in casting
alloys) with sufficient agitation, lower bath
temperature, proper fixture (throughout so-
lutionizing, quenching, and age-hardening
treatments), and straightening (in the as-
quenched state after taking out from the
fixture) procedure. The initial cost of these
polymer solutions as a replacement to the
conventional hot-water quenching method
is easily compensated for by other advan-
tages such as reduced scrap, reduced ma-
chining (compared to two machining opera-
tions required--one before and another
after heat treatment--in the conventional
water-quenching method), and increased fa-
tigue life as a result of reduced convective
heat transfer or film coefficient between the
part and the quenchant, more uniform
quench, precise control of quench rates,
and improved heat-transfer qualities from
the deposition of liquid organic polymer on
the surface of the part being quenched (Ref
97-99). This method costs less, therefore
saves time and allows easy shaping, bend-
ing, and twisting of the parts without estab-
lishing residual stresses. Such parts as lead-
ing edge wing skins, spars, and bulkheads
are used in the aerospace industries (Ref
96).
Importance of Design
The wrong design of the tool material
may result in the establishment of nonuni-
form heating and cooling of the compo-
nents, which produces overload and/or in-
ternal stresses leading to distortion and
failure during or after hardening. Correct
consideration at the design stage plays an
important role in lessening the distortion
and danger of cracking. The basic principle
of successful design is to plan shapes that
will minimize the temperature gradient
through the part during quenching. Funda-
mental rules such as maintaining a simple,
uniform, regular, and symmetrical section
with comparatively few shape changes, en-
suring small and smooth cross-sectional
size changes, and using large radii are still
too frequently overlooked at the design
stage. Thus, successful heat treatment de-
mands a rational design that avoids sharp
corners as well as sudden and undue
changes of section.
It is often possible for tool designers to
compensate for size distortion. For exam-
ple, in preparing precision hobs for gear
cutting, dimensional accuracy must be kept
within very close tolerances. On linear lon-
gitudinal growth, it is the general practice to
go out-of-round in the following high-speed
steel bars as much as 0.3% in M1 type, 0.2%
in M2 type, and 0.15% in T1 type during
heat treatment. These data will alter slightly
with changes in design of the hobs, but
essentially the growth in tungsten-base
high-speed steel is lower than that of the
618 / Process and Quality Control Considerations
molybdenum-base high-speed steel (M1 and
M2). This does not require any difficulty if
the growth is compensated for and if the
steel is consistent in its growth (Ref 87).
The distortion produced in the surface
hardening of long shafts by the scanning
method can be a great problem if the equip-
ment is not in very good condition. Due
consideration must be given so that locating
centers run concentrically, in line and at the
appropriate speed; the coil must be accurate-
ly aligned, and the quench must be correctly
designed with sufficient number of holes of
suitable size and angle. For long shafts with a
relatively small diameter (for example, half-
shafts, which are likely to distort), the use of
hydraulically operated restraining rolls usual-
ly overcomes this (Ref 100).
The designer should bear in mind the
following rules while designing a die or
machine part that is to be heat treated:
• Distribution of the material should be as
uniform as possible
• Provide fillets (large radii) at the base of
keyways, cutter teeth, and gear teeth to
avoid stress concentration; semicircular
keyways, which permit the use of round-
cornered keyways, are the right choices.
Ideally, drives using involute splines are
preferred over keyways
• Avoid abrupt changes of section; in other
words, provide smooth changes of sec-
tion
• Large holes (such as drawing or cutting
openings in die rings or plates) must be
centrally located from the outer contour.
In some cases holes are drilled through
the heaviest section of the tool in order to
help fairly balance the weight of the sec-
tion rather than to unbalance it (Ref 64).
Deep blind holes should always be avoid-
ed because they cause nonuniform
quenching. If this is not possible, the hole
can be ground in after hardening. Drilled
hole junctions in a steel part should be
avoided because they enhance very high
and undesirable cooling conditions. The
problem with these cross holes is to get
sufficient quenchant into them. The in-
side surface of the holes tends to be in a
state of high tensile stress, usually leading
to cracking, at least with water quench-
ing. As a minimum, the corner at the
junction of the holes with outer diameter
of the part should be given a generous
radius to better distribute the tensile
stress (Ref 90). Similarly, grooves and
keyways in highly stressed areas should
be avoided, or, if possible, they should be
located in low-stressed areas of the part.
Alternatively, fixtures should be used
that make it possible for the hole or the
inside of the groove to be quenched in the
beginning or more rapidly than the rest of
the part (Ref 24)
• Round off all the holes, corners, and
outer edges
• If sharp corners are unavoidable, provide
relief notches in place of sharp edges
• The insertion of identification marks on
the hardened component is recommend-
ed, preferably after hardening with tools
having well-rounded edges and minimum
deformation (shallow penetration depth),
and at positions far away from the high-
stress concentration zones (reentrant an-
gles, bends, and so on) (Ref 101)
• Large intricate dies should be made up in
sections, which frequently simplifies heat
treatment (Ref 64)
REFERENCES
1. N.P. McLeod and J. Nutting, Met.
Technol., Vol 9, 1982, p 399-404
2. G.E. Hale and J. Nutting, Int. Met.
Rev., Vol 29 (No. 4), 1984, p 273-298
3. R.W. Gardiner, Met. Technol., Voi 4,
1977, p 536-547
4. T.J. Baker and W.D. Harrison, Met.
Technol., Vol 2 (No. 5), p 201-205
5. T.J. Baker and R. Johnson, J. Iron
Steel Inst., Vol 211, 1973, p 783-791
6. R.C. Andrews, G.M. Weston, and
R.T. Southin, J. Aust. Inst. Met., Vol
21, 1976, p 126-131
7. R.C. Andrews and G.M. Weston, J.
Aust. Inst. Met., Vol 22, 1977, p 171-
176
8. G.D. Joy and J. Nutting, in Effects of
Second Phase Particles on the Me-
chanical Properties of Steels, Iron and
Steel Institute, 1971, p 95-100
9. R.N. O'Brien, D.H. Jack, and J. Nut-
ting, in Proceedings of Heat Treat-
ment '76, Metals Society, 1976, p 161-
168
10. C.L. Briant and S.K. Benerjee, Met-
all. Trans. A, Vol 10A, 1979, p 1151-
1155
11. B.J. Sultz and C.J. McMahon, Jr.,
Metall. Trans. A, Vol 4A, 1973, p
2485-2489
12. N.P. McLeod, Ph.D. thesis, Universi-
ty of Leeds, 1978
13. A. Preece and J. Nutting, J. Iron Steel
Inst., Vol 164, 1950, p 46-50
14. R. Prestner, Met. Mater., April 1974,
p 229
15. A.H. Bodimeade, Ph.D. thesis, Uni-
versity of Leeds, 1974
16. G.D. Joy, Ph.D. thesis, University of
Leeds, 1971
17. D.R. Glue, C.H. Jones, and H.K.M.
Lloyd, Met. Technol., Vol 2, 1975, p
416-421
18. T. Hanabusa and H. Fujiwara, in
Proc. 32nd Jpn. Congr. Mater. Res.,
1989, p 27-36
19. G.E. Dieter, Engineering Design, Mc-
Graw-Hill, 1982
20. G. Parrish and G.S. Harper, Produc-
tion Gas Carburizing , Pergamon
Press, 1985
21. B. Hildenwall and T. Ericsson, in Pro-
ceedings of Hardenability Concepts
with Applications to Steel, D.V.
Doane and J.S. Kirkaidy, Ed., TMS-
AIME, 1978, p 579-606
22. E.B. Evans, in Encyclopaedia of Ma-
terials Science and Engineering, Per-
gamon Press, 1986, p 4183-4188
23. R.F. Kern and M.E. Suess, Steel Se-
lection, Wiley-Interscience, 1979
24. R.F. Kern, Selecting Steels and De-
signing Parts for Heat Treatment,
American Society for Metals, 1969
25. R.B. Liss, C.G. Massieon, and A.S.
McCiosky, "The Development of Heat
Treat Stresses and Their Effect on Fa-
tigue Strength of Hardened Steel," Pre-
sented at Society of Automotive Engi-
neers midyear meeting, 1965
26. R.W. Shin and G.H. Walter, in Pro-
ceedings of Residual Stresses for En-
gineers and Metallurgists, J. Vande
Walle, Ed., American Society for Met-
als, 1981, p 1-20
27. R.W.K. Honeycombe, Steels: Micro-
structure and Properties, Arnold, 1982
28. B.S. Lement, Distortion in Tool Steel,
American Society for Metals, 1959
29. H.C. Child, Heat Treat. Met., No. 4,
1981, p 89-94
30. A. Rose and H.P. Hougardy, in Pro-
ceedings of the Transformation and
Hardenability in Steels Symposium,
Climax Molybdenum Company, 1967,
p 155-167
31. H.P. Kirchner, Strengthening of Ce-
ramics: Treatment Tests and Design
Applications, Marcel Dekker, 1979
32. W. Baldvin, Jr., Residual Stresses, in
Proceedings of the American Society
for Testing and Materials, Vol 49,
1949, p 539-583
33. R.E. Reedhill, Physical Metallurgy
Principles, 2nd ed., Brooks/Cole Engi-
neering Division, 1973
34. A. Rose, Hiirt.-Tech. Mitt., Vol 21
(No. 1), 1966, p 1-6
35. K.E. Thelning, Steel and Its Heat
Treatment, Butterworths, 1985
36. D.E. Diesburg, C. Kim, and W.
Fairhurst, Proceedings of Heat Treat-
ment '81, Metals Society, 1983, p 178-
184
37. T. Yamaguchi, Z.G. Wang, and T.
Inoue, in Proceedings of the 27th Ja-
pan Congress on Materials Research,
1984, p 147; Mater. Sci. Technol., Vol
1, 1985, p 872-876
38. D.P. Koistinen, Trans. ASM, Vol 50,
1958, p 227-241
39. L. Salonen, Acta Polytech. Scand.
Ser., Vol 109, 1972, p 7-26
40. M. Motoyama, R.E. Ricklefs, and
J.A. Larson, "The Effect of Carburiz-
ing Variables on Residual Stresses in
Hardened Chromium Steel," SAE
Technical Paper Series 750050, Socie-
ty of Automotive Engineers, Feb 1975
41. H.C.F. Rozendaal, P.F. Colijn, and

E.J. Mittemeijer, Surf. Eng., Vol 1,
1985, p 30-42
42. Case Hardening of Steel, H.E. Boyer,
Ed., ASM International, 1987
43. T. Endo and M. Kawakami, J. Soc.
Mater. Sci. Jpn., Vol 32, 1983, p 114
44. E.D. Walker, in Proceedings of Resid-
ual Stress for Designers and Metallur-
gists, L.J. Vande Walle, Ed., Ameri-
can Society for Metals, 1981, p 41-50
45. S.L. Semiatin and D.E. Stutz, Induc-
tion Heat Treatment of Steel, Ameri-
can Society for Metals, 1985
46. M. Melander, Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol 1,
1985, p 877-882
47. K. Masubuchi, in Encyclopaedia of
Materials Science and Engineering,
Pergamon Press, 1986, p 4180-4183
48. L. Karlsson, in Thermal Stresses I,
Vol 1, R. Hetnarski, Ed., Elsevier,
1986, p 299-389
49. L. Novikov, Theory of Heat Treat-
ment of Metals, Mir Publishers, 1978
50. R.N. Mittal and G.W. Rowe, Met.
Technol., Vol 9, 1982, p 191-197
51. J.O. Kristiansson, J. Therm. Stresses,
Vol 5, 1982, p 315-330
52. "Polymer Quenchant User Report,"
Tenaxol, Inc.
53. R.G. Bathgate, Met. Forum, Vol 6,
1983, p 11
54. L. Mordfin, in Proceedings of Residu-
al Stress for Designers and Metallur-
gists, L.J. Vande Walle, Ed., Ameri-
can Society for Metals, 1981, p 189-210
55. F. Abbasi and A.J. Fletcher, Mater.
Sci. Technol., Vol 1, p 770-779
56. L. Mordfin, in Encyclopaedia of Ma-
terials Science and Engineering, Per-
gamon Press, 1986, p 4189-4194
57. E.J. Mittemeijer, J. Heat Treat., Vol 3
(No. 2), 1983, p 114-119
58. T.H. De Keijser, J.I. Langford, E.J.
Mittemeijer, and A.B.P. Vogels, J.
Appl. Crystallogr., Vol 15, 1982, p
308-314
59. T.R. Finlayson, Met. Forum, Vol 6,
1983, p 4-10
60. D.S. Mountain and G.P. Cooper,
Defects and Distortion in Heat-Treated Parts / 619
Strain, Vol 25 (No. 1), 1989, p 15-19
61. R.F. Kern, Heat Treat., Vol 17 (No.
4), 1985, p 38-42
62. D.H. Stone, in Proceedings of the
1988 ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Con-
ference, American Society of Mechan-
ical Engineers, 1988, p 43-53
63. C.E. " J o e " Devis, Ask Joe, American
Society for Metals, 1983
64. Chapter 8, in Troubleshooting Manu-
facturing Processes, 4th ed., L.K.
Gillespie, Ed., Society of Manufac-
turing Engineers, 1988
65. A.K. Sinha, Ferrous Physical Metal-
lurgy, Butterworths, 1989
66. G. Wahl and I.V. Etchells, in Proceed-
ings of Heat Treatment '81, Metals
Society, 1983, p 116-122
67. G. Parrish, The Influence of Micro-
structure on the Properties of Case-
Carburized Components, American
Society for Metals, 1980
68. R.P. Brobst and G. Krauss, Metall.
Trans. A, Vol 5A, 1974, p 457-462
69. C.A. Apple and G. Krauss, Metall.
Trans. A, Vol 4A, 1973, p 1195-1200
70. T.A. Balliett and G. Krauss, Metall
Trans. A, Vol 7a, 1976, p 81-86
71. G.E. Hollox and R.T. Von Bergn,
Heat Treat. Met., No. 2, 1978, p 27-31
72. T. Bell, Survey of Heat Treatment of
Engineering Components, Iron and
Steel Institute, 1973, p 69-72
73. K.W, Chambers, Heat Treatment of
Metals, Iron and Steel Institute, 1966,
p 94-95
74. R. Wilson, Metallurgy and Heat
Treatment of Tool Steels, McGraw-
Hill, 1975, p 93-95
75. P.G. Greenwood and R.H. Johnson,
Proc. R. Soc., Vol A283, 1965, p 403
76. B.L. Josefson, Mater. Sci. Technol.,
Vol 1 (No. 10), 1985, p 904-908
77. A. Ferrante, Met. Prog., Vol 87, 1965,
p 87-90
78. B.R. Wilding, Heat Treatment of En-
gineering Components, Iron and Steel
Institute, 1970, p 20-25
79. R.F. Kern, Heat Treat., Vol 17 (No.
3), 1985, p 41-45
80. D.J. Grieve, Metall. Mater. Technol.,
Vol 7 (No. 8), 1975, p 397-403
81. F.D. Waterfall, in Met. Treat Drop
Forg., April 1985, p 139-144
82. S. Visvanathan, TISCO J., Vol 23
(No. 4), 1976, p 199-204
83. Y. Toshioka, Mater. Sci. Technol.,
Vol 1 (No. 10), 1985, p 883-892
84. R. Verma, V.A. Swaroop, and A.K.
Roy, TISCO J., Oct 1977, p 157-160
85. Section 8 in Cassels Handbook, 9th
ed., ICI Ltd., 1964
86. R.F. Harvey, Met. Prog, Vol 79 (No.
6), 1961, p 73-75
87. A.K. Sinha, Tool Alloy Steels, Aug
1980, p 219-224
88. G.F. Melloy, Hardening of Steel, Les-
son 5, in Heat Treatment o f Steels,
Metals Engineering Institute, Ameri-
can Society for Metals, 1979, p 1-28
89. R.F. Kern, Heat Treat., Vol 18 (No.
9), 1986, p 19-23
90. Hayes, Inc., private communication,
Oct 1989
91. J.M. Neiderman and C.H. Luiten,
Proceedings of Heat Treatment '84,
Metals Society, 2984, p 43.1-43.8
92. Met. Mater., Vol 9, July/August 1975,
p 52-53
93. T.E. Hebel, Heat Treat., Vol 21 (No.
9), 1989, p 29-31
94. F. Dunlevey, Heat Treat., Vol 21 (No.
2), 1989, p 34-35
95. " U C O N Quenchants for Ferrous and
Nonferrous Metals," Tenaxol, Inc.,
1988
96. R. Creal, Heat Treat., Vol 18 (No. 12),
1986, p 27-29
97. C.E. Bates, J. Heat Treat., Vol 5 (No.
1), 1987, p 27-40
98. "Information on Polymer Quen-
chants," Tenaxol, Inc., 1989
99. C.E. Bates and G.E. Totten, Heat
Treat. Met., No. 4, 1988, p 89-97
100. P.D. Jenkins, Metallurgia, Vol 45
(No. 4), 1978, p 196-199
101. F. Strasser, Heat Treat. Met., No. 4,
1980, p 91-96