Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student Retention Natalie Parker
Student Retention Natalie Parker
Natalie Parker
Author Note
Contact: parkern17@students.ecu.edu
COMMUNITY COLLEGE RETENTION !2
Abstract
This paper reviews institutional elements affecting community college student retention. It
describes key findings from recent scholarly research studies on student retention. This paper
Introduction
Measuring and improving community college student retention is critical for students, the
community and higher education institutions (Fike & Fike, 2008). Student retention is most
important for the student to succeed and have a life skill to be independent and successful in the
workforce. The community needs skilled workers and retention is important to producing our
economic workforce (Fike & Fike, 2008). Retention also impacts college funding. If a student
drops out, the institution no longer receives their money. Also, performance funding has used
completion and transfer rates as part of state funding formulas. Students and colleges vary
greatly, which makes tracking student retention a complex endeavor with many factors affecting
both the individual student’s situation and the leadership that shapes the college environment.
Literature Review
Over 70% of community college students never attain a certification or degree after five
years of enrollment (Kraemer, 2013). What impacts student retention at a community college?
Admissions testing, financial aid, student services, curriculum, leadership, peer interaction,
faculty-student interaction, GPA and involvement with extracurricular activities are factors
affecting student retention (Travers, 2016). The factors vary from a community college campus
to a four year university (Fike & Fike, 2008). Students are older at a community college with
over 60% being over 25 (p. 70). Community colleges have a higher percentage of minorities (p.
70). There is a higher percentage of both low-income and part-time students on community
college campuses (p. 70). Because of the lower qualifications for entrance, community college
COMMUNITY COLLEGE RETENTION !4
students can also be less prepared than university students. These differences warrant a specific
focus on how to better address student retention not as a collective in higher education, but
In 2001, Atlantic Cape Community College decided to have faculty make a big effort to
reach out to students to offer advisement. Previously, the “vast majority” of their 5,000 students
had been advised by non-faculty (McArthur, 2005, p.4). The arts and humanities faculty
received training, then the arts and humanities faculty made a huge push to make contact with
students and advise them. The following semester student retention from the arts and humanities
students was 3% higher than the other department at the college (p.14). Duplicating this study at
Institutional Characteristics
Yu’s study on differing models of student retention identified the following elements as
most critical: percentage of part-time faculty, ACT and SAT scores, student working hours,
institution size, percentage of minority students and percentage of female students (2015). He
groups these elements into two categories, student academic integration and student social
integration. Using data from the 2003/04 school year, he analyzed the data of 1940 students to
see the overall impact of elements affecting student retention across 50 colleges. Yu found that
larger community colleges have lower completion rates (p. 96). He also found that the higher the
percentage of female students is, the lower the completion rates are. He noted that childcare was
the number one reason that women drop out of college (p. 96). Yu’s study showed that diversity
is a strength and increased retention was shown for schools with larger minority populations (p.
COMMUNITY COLLEGE RETENTION !5
97). Overall, Yu’s study also found that strong academic and social integration equals strong
Teach Self-Esteem
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave a $3.2-million grant to a coalition of over
1,000 colleges called Campus Compact (Mangan, 2015). Service based learning projects are
used as part of a peer tutoring program on community college campuses in a program called
Connect2Complete. Students are empowered to share their skills and tutor their peers on
remedial classes that they actually took themselves. The students being tutored are able to see
how you can achieve academic success and give back to your community. Student retention
among participating students grew from 26% to 32% during the program (Mangan, 2015).
In a study of over 9,000 first year community college students, Fike and Fike identified
courses, financial aid, education level of their parents, the number of courses dropped during
their first semester, and participation in the student support services (p. 68). Remediation for
students was a critical element for student success in this study, which estimated that “two
million students would drop out of college annually” without remedial classes (p. 80). The
second biggest indicator of student completion was online class (p.81) While the study made no
claims to why this seemed to foster student retention, it seems clear that non-traditional students
are often older with more commitments and need flexible scheduling that online classes offer. If
they have a sick child, they don’t have to miss class. They can make their online class while
staying home with their sick child. Convenience of taking a class is key.
COMMUNITY COLLEGE RETENTION !6
To improve student retention with online courses an online orientation course benefits
student retention. The online orientation should “address everything from technical issues and
the technical requirements of online learning, to course expectations, etiquette, and course
procedures” (Robichaud, 2016, p. 58). Taylor did a study to see student retention in online
courses comparing the drop rate to courses with and without an online orientation in five
different courses (Taylor, 2015). In four of the five courses, the online orientation increased
student retention in the course. Focus groups with students would be able to attain how to
improve the orientation course. Taylor suggested future research to expand the study to a much
Team Leadership
A study of Inver Hills Community College (IHCC) student retention showed that helping
the student becoming more engaged with an orientation class was important (Stebleton &
Schmidt, 2010). The bigger finding in studying IHCC’s process of creating and implementing
initiatives for better retention was that folding in employees at various levels of authority can
create a healthy boarded perspective on what students need. Particularly to this study, community
college counselors were instrumental in developing the orientation class, building relationships
with students and catching issues before they resulted in a student dropping out. The word,
“governance” was not mentioned in the study, though it describes a wonderful team leadership
style of governance that took the expertise of all key faculty into consideration in planning
leadership initiatives. The study made clear that good two-way communication between all staff
Classroom Management
A central theme of the directives is to be positive. Excitement for a topic is contagious. Faculty
should be enthusiastic and build relationships with their students with two way communications
(Saret, n.d.). It is not enough for an instructor to provide a biography of themselves, faculty must
also listen and learn about their students. Faculty must also listen to student feedback about the
syllabus and be considerate of the class’s other responsibilities (Saret, n.d.). Faculty should be
honest about their own struggles learning and intentional to encourage and praise in feedback
(Saret, n.d.). With students who are struggling academically, faculty should be proactive in
reaching out (Saret, n.d.). As advising is a proven factor in improving student retention, advisors
should be invited to speak and put a face to their name (Saret, n.d.). A representative from
student services could drop in with a few sentences on their offerings. If term papers are part of
the course, faculty can provide resources for researching and required style format. Extra credit
could be given to students for attending relevant on-campus activities and participating in
department clubs (Saret, n.d.). All of these classroom management suggestions are provided by
Discussion
There are two things that can be done to improve student retention nationwide. Reducing
faculty load and implementing programs that have been proven successful at improving student
retention are the keys to more wide spread success in community colleges.
against meaningful interactions with all students should be a big consideration for college
COMMUNITY COLLEGE RETENTION !8
leadership. College governance must weigh staff feedback and initiatives heavily if they are to
carry so much of the weight of student retention. The biggest question that community college
leadership should be asking is- how can the college better support faculty in order for them to
have more time to create meaningful relationships with students? Supporting faculty in a way
that they have more time to develop relationships with students can take the shape of a lost list of
faculty support. Tutoring and writing centers free up faculty. Offering templates for grading
rubrics, lunch delivery, courier service, teachers assistants, streamlined paperwork and valet
parking during peak hours for intercity locations are items that could offer faculty more time to
Community college leaders generally know the elements that are most important to
student retention. There are plenty of best practice articles and resources about increasing
student retention. Getting bogged down in creating initiatives and working through the obstacles
of a new initiative is time consuming. Colleges can skip a great deal of planning and research by
using the footprint of successful programs. Why create the wheel when there are case studies
documenting programs used at community colleges with above average retention? Hanover
Research studied three community colleges with above average two-year graduation rates that
hover around 50% (Hanover Research, 2014, p.24). Hanover Research detailed the programs
used to attain above average student retention at South Florida State College, Community
Conclusion
The average community college student retention is surprisingly bad. There is not a
simple formula to increase it. The many complex elements involved with student retention make
it difficult for faculty with heavy work loads to address. The research studies noted in this paper
provide scholarly research on the different factors that are proven to improve student retention
but none of the factors or initiatives studied made a double digit impact. The gains for improving
each factor affecting student retention were small. Faculty advisement had a three percent
student retention gain (McArthur, 2005, p.14). The other scholarly studies presented had
similarly small gains from addressing individual areas affecting student retention. For future
research, more studies should be done on campuses that have the highest retention rates. The
most impactful student retention programs at the 20 community colleges with the highest student
retention should be detailed and widely shared. If a wide range of successful community
colleges are studied, then help for schools could be available with focus on a similar trade or key
subject area. National organizations should do a better job of communicating with the successful
community colleges on the details and most important aspects of their programs that increase
retention. These best practice programs and case studies should be reviewed and shared widely
References
Fike, D. S., & Fike, R. (2008). Predictors of First-Year Student Retention in the Community
10.1177/0091552108320222
Hanover Research. (2014). Best Practices in Retention at Community Colleges. Retrieved from
https://www.hanoverresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Best-Practices-in-
Retention-at-Community-Colleges.pdf
Kraemer, J. (2013, May 9). Comparing Community College Completion Rates. Retrieved
from http://ncee.org/2013/05/statistic-of-the-month-comparing-community-college-
completion-rates/.
Mangan, K. (2015, April 17). To Improve Retention, Community Colleges Teach Self-
Saret, L. (n.d.). Retaining student in classes: Putting theory into everyday practice. Retrieved on
LauraSaretOaktonWebSite/Ways%20Faculty%20Can%20
Encourage%20Student%20Retention.htm
COMMUNITY COLLEGE RETENTION !11
Stebleton, M. J., & Schmidt, L. (2010). Building Bridges: Community College Practitioners as
Retention Leaders. Journal of Student Affairs Research & Practice, 47(1), 78–98. https://
doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.6018
Taylor, J. M. (2015). Innovative orientation leads to improved success in online courses. Online
Yu, H. (2015). Student retention at two-year community colleges: A structural equation modeling
approach. International Journal of Continuing Education & Lifelong Learning, 8(1), 85–
101.