Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Systematic Theology - Berkhof, Louis - Parte99
Systematic Theology - Berkhof, Louis - Parte99
txt
1. THEIR ORIGIN. Besides the good there also are evil angels, who
delight in opposing God and antagonizing His work. Though they are also
creatures of God, they were not created as evil angels. God saw
everything that He had created, and it was very good, Gen. 1:31. There
are two passages in Scripture which clearly imply that some of the
angels did not retain their original position, but fell from the state
in which they were created, II Pet. 2:4; Jude 6. The special sin of
these angels is not revealed, but has generally been thought to consist
in this that they exalted themselves over against God, and aspired to
supreme authority. If this ambition played an important part in the
life of Satan and led to his downfall, it would at once explain why he
tempted man on this particular point, and sought to lure him to his
destruction by appealing to a possible similar ambition in man. Some of
the early Church Fathers distinguished between Satan and the
subordinate devils in explaining the cause of their fall. That of the
fall of Satan was found in pride, but that of the more general fall in
the angelic world, in fleshly lust, Gen. 6:2. That interpretation of
Gen. 6:2 was gradually discarded, however, during the Middle Ages. In
view of this it is rather surprising to find that several modern
commentators are reiterating the idea in their interpretation of II
Pet. 2:4 and Jude 6 as, for instance, Meyer, Alford, Mayor, Wohlenberg.
It is an explanation, however, that is contrary to the spiritual nature
of the angels, and to the fact that, as Matt. 22:30 would seem to
imply, there is no sexual life among the angels. Moreover, on that
interpretation we shall have to assume a double fall in the angelic
world, first the fall of Satan, and then, considerably later, the fall
resulting in the host of devils that now serves Satan. It is much more