Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Base Paper 4
Base Paper 4
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:534948 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
Promotional
Promotional channels of FMCG channels of
firms and tourism FMCG firms
A standardisation/adaptation perspective
5
Konstantinos Poulis
University of Essex, Southend-on-sea, UK, and
Efthimios Poulis
Buckinghamshire New University, High Wycombe, UK
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to shed more light on the influence of a tourism-oriented
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
environment on the promotional channel strategies of fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) firms.
Design/methodology/approach – The study utilises an exploratory, qualitative research design
among 14 case studies of FMCG firms operating in the tourism-oriented environment of Greece.
Findings – Findings show that most firms utilise adapted promotional channels due to the influence
of structural characteristics of the tourism industry and tourists’ modes of behavior.
Research limitations/implications – The outcomes of this qualitative study are limited to the
context that is investigated and thus, future researchers are encouraged to investigate similar contexts
with the goal of generalising findings.
Practical implications – Findings suggest that firms ought to appreciate the contextual
idiosyncrasies of Euro-Mediterranean countries (as a result of international tourism) and thus,
tailor their programs to these idiosyncrasies, which are distinct from other non-tourism-oriented
environments.
Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper that investigates
the effect of tourism-induced idiosyncrasies of Euro-Mediterranean countries on FMCG firms’
promotional strategies. In light of the increasing importance of global consumer mobility, such studies
are expected to increase.
Keywords Greece, Tourism, Promotional methods, Fast moving consumer goods
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
International marketing, as a scientific field with a well-grounded evolution over time,
has offered a holistic picture of how firms market their products across countries.
Pitfalls, blunders, success stories and several models highlighting strategies and factors
have been presented that allow us to better understand how firms serve the needs of
millions of people around the world (Whitelock and Fastoso, 2007; Vrontis, 2003;
Dalgic and Heijblom, 1996; Ricks, 1993; Kashani, 1989; Jain, 1989). In particular, the
international marketing constructs of standardisation vs adaptation (henceforth
described as SA) have been long utilised in order to portray the strategic marketing
alternatives firms have when they deploy their international operations (Vrontis et al.,
2009; Chung, 2009; Lages et al., 2008; Fastoso and Whitelock, 2007; Vrontis and Vronti, EuroMed Journal of Business
Vol. 6 No. 1, 2011
2004; Boddewyn and Grosse, 1995; Cavusgil et al., 1993). pp. 5-23
This literature on the SA debate has been largely developed upon a major premise. q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1450-2194
This is the assumption that all consumer groups in a country are culturally DOI 10.1108/14502191111130280
EMJB homogeneous (or at least, treated as such) or that, intra-country cultural variations
6,1 are less important than inter-country differences. This might have been a necessary
condition for the field to excel however, several studies increasingly highlight the
strong influence of the multi-cultural character of national markets, as a result of,
e.g. immigration or inherent, within-country racial pluralism (Cui, 1997; Chung and
Wang, 2006). Therefore, the relevance of political boundaries as frameworks of national
6 homogeneity is decreased to a certain extent and inducements stemming from
within-country cultural diversity also feature as influential for strategy making.
From the point of view of the present paper, an even more important feature of such
studies is that these researches use the SA construct to explain marketing strategies
of firms in a domestic context. For example, Cui (1997) uses the SA framework to explore
alternative marketing strategies of consumer goods firms operating in the single but
multi-ethnic market of America (as a result of immigration) while Chung and Wang (2006)
recently considered the multi-cultural cities of China and applied the SA framework in the
services sector across culturally diverse Chinese cities. These authors point out that “the
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
firms operating in these countries face “international” marketing tasks but within the
confines of an enlarged country. These firms do not have to serve only the “native”,
permanent population but also a multi-cultural group of consumers on a temporary
basis per annum. For this research though, the most important thing is that it is not only
firms in the tourist sector (e.g. hotels, tour operators, airline companies, travel agents,
etc.) that are thus affected. Clearly, tourists are also consumers of a whole range of
goods and services that are not produced by the tourist industry. For example, tourists
consume beers, soft drinks, ice creams, toothpastes and snack food. Thus, tourists
are consumers of packaged goods belonging to product categories that are sold in the
destination/market even if tourism was not developed at all in the country and also are
sold in the tourists’ usual habitat back home.
This market feature, while having challenging implications for FMCG firms is a
reality the research community in business studies has not investigated before. Despite
tourism’s importance as one of the largest industries in the world, the fact that it affects
numerous non-tourism-related firms in several countries is still unexplored. Research
has not shown how these FMCG firms selling food, beverage and cosmetics products
tackle this additional and nationally heterogeneous consumer base that temporarily
changes the status quo of the markets they operate. Therefore, the research objective of
this study is the following:
RO. To explore the consequences of within country diversity as a result of inbound
tourism for the promotional channel strategy of FMCG firms operating in the
tourist-receiving country.
France 79.08 60
Spain 58.45 40
Italy 41.05 58
Greece 14.78 11
Table I.
Notes: 2006 data are the latest, more accurate, available annual data with regard to international Foreign and domestic
tourist arrivals by the time of this paper’s submission; World Tourism Organization/World Tourism consumers in a country
EMJB 3. Research questions and literature review
6,1 The literature review revolves around the core SA debate in international marketing
research. This rich body of established knowledge has been developed for many decades
already with proponents of standardization (Yip, 1996; Levitt, 1983; Buzzell, 1968) arguing
for a common marketing strategy across countries. The main premise behind this thesis
is the homogenization of consumer preferences or the convergence of cross-market
8 segments and the increasingly similar environmental characteristics across the world
(Griffith, 2010). On the other hand, advocates of adaptation (Cavusgil and Zou, 1994; Jain,
1989; Kashani, 1989) support the view that strategies must be tailored to the unique
characteristics of each market. The main reason behind this need for local responsiveness
is the cultural diversity that exists across the regions of the world. Cultural differences are
still tenacious and thus, ignoring the need for more responsive strategies (as a result of
these differences) can lead to low performance (e.g. lower market share).
This bipolar approach to international marketing strategy has occupied a significant
position in the marketing literature but in several respects it is considered unfruitful.
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
The “either/or” dichotomy that many researchers advocated seems neither pragmatic
nor efficient for firms. Rather, reality indicates that firms strive to achieve a certain
degree of standardisation but nevertheless, a more customer-oriented view on markets
eventually necessitates elements of an adapted strategy, too (Vrontis et al., 2009). This
contingency approach is dependent on a number of determinants. Behavioural aspects
(reasons) may pull firms towards each side of the continuum while factors moderate the
relative importance of these reasons (Vrontis, 2003).
Given the RO, this paper also builds on such studies which focus on the SA debate.
Thus, this literature was the main pool of insight that guided data collection and
informed case data analysis. Specifically, the SA literature was approached with the
purpose of extracting insights related to the following research questions:
RQ1. How does the contextually idiosyncratic character of a Mediterranean market
as a result of international tourism influence FMCG firms’ promotional
channel strategy towards standardization or adaptation?
RQ2. What are the significant forces that collectively lead to one or the other
approach?
At this point, the following definitions for the two main constructs used in this study
are clarified (adapted from Cui (1997) and Chung and Wang (2006)).
Standardization refers to using the same promotional channel strategies towards
the tourist population with the ones used for the permanent, local population throughout
the year while.
Adaptation refers to using promotional channel strategies which are different to the
ones used for the permanent, local population.
The background forces that influence a firm’s decision to standardize or adapt its
strategy are numerous and the literature has identified and investigated a wide range of
them (Okazaki et al., 2007; Whitelock and Fastoso, 2007; Calantone et al., 2006). Typical
factors that are suggested to favor standardization include business-to-business contexts,
the quest for cost reductions and economies of scale achieved through standardization or
the similarity in stages of economic development and institutional environments between
countries (Griffith, 2010). On the other hand, the culture-bound nature of products,
the variations in consumer preferences or differences in regulations and legal frameworks Promotional
call for a more responsive strategy through adaptation (Lages et al., 2008). channels of
One of the pioneers who modeled aforementioned factors that seem to favor
either approach was Buzzell (1968). He made a thorough analysis of the benefits of FMCG firms
standardization including significant cost savings, consistency with customers, improved
planning and control and the exploitation of good ideas on a worldwide scale. However, he
also considered the barriers to standardization, which impose a limit to the degree of 9
standardization in elements of the marketing mix. Overall, he offered a comprehensive
model of the influential variables with regards to the degree of standardization of
marketing elements. Those variables were classified as market characteristics including
the physical environment, the stage of economic development and cultural factors,
industry conditions including product life cycle and competition, marketing institutions
including the distribution system and the advertising channels and legal restrictions.
Another set of the numerous factors that dictate SA strategies are the environmental
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
underlines purchasing of such products, the literature only partially confirms such
views empirically. For example, in Michell et al. (1998) research, the type of product was
not associated with the degree of standardization with industrial firms having similar
levels of standardization with consumer firms. The analysis indicated that the degree of
standardization related more to within-firm variables than industry type while the
degree of adaptation was connected more with country variables (customs, consumer
characteristics, culture, legal system, channels structure, etc.). However, the desirability
of culture-bound products’ adaptation is well manifested, at least theoretically, in the
literature (O’Donnell and Jeong, 2000; Cavusgil and Zou, 1994; Samiee and Roth, 1992;
Whitelock, 1987; Rau and Preble, 1987).
Organizational/managerial factors often intermingle and refer to internal characteristics
or processes of the firm (Whitelock and Pimblett, 1997; Cavusgil et al., 1993). They more or
less coincide with the field of research that deals with the resource-based view of the firm
(Barney et al., 2001), i.e. company-specific, internal actions and facts as opposed to
industrial organization theory (Porter, 1980). Items in this category can include the
nationality of the parent company, the nature of company ownership, firm’s international
experience or the attitude toward international operations including the centralization of
decision making and corporate openness towards foreign approaches (Chung, 2009;
Cadogan et al., 2002; Solberg, 2002; Ozsomer et al., 1991; Rau and Preble, 1987). The
implications for companies vary according to the status of the firm (MNE vs local firm and
even further an MNE with a geocentric vs a polycentric approach; Perlmutter, 1969) and one
can expect different influences on each firm. As shown in Ozsomer et al. (1991), the
influencing role of nationality of the parent company was important. For example,
American firms tend to standardize more than most of their European counterparts
whereas findings also supported the view that MNEs tend to desire more globally
integrated marketing programs through higher control over subsidiaries. This is mostly
reflected on product design decisions, brand name, packaging and advertising message.
Yip (1997) also found that parent firm’s characteristics such as nationality and size define in
a way a polycentric, ethnocentric or geocentric orientation while Cavusgil and Zou (1994)
stated that firms’ skills and constraints profoundly influence firms’ strategies.
Therefore, the literature has offered a wide array of factors that may influence the
strategy of firms towards standardization or adaptation. This growth of research has
given rise to classification schemes which summarize factors via meta-analyses, Promotional
modeling and integration of empirical research (e.g. Vrontis, 2003; Papavassiliou and channels of
Stathakopoulos, 1997; Agrawal, 1995). The outcome of these classifications has given
rise to several reasons and/or factors (internal vs external, mandatory vs desirable, FMCG firms
environmental-industrial-organizational, controllable vs uncontrollable factors, etc.)
which offer an insightful portrayal of reality.
A recent development in the literature, though is the need to distinguish between 11
“significant” and “peripheral” forces pinpointing towards either direction (Vrontis et al.,
2009). For example, “market development” and “political reasons” were found by authors
to significantly influence firms towards adaptation whereas “competition” and “culture”
were found to have less influence on adapted practices. In a similar vein, control-and
cost-related considerations significantly call for standardization whereas uniformity of
image and economies of scale were seen as “peripheral reasons” pushing towards the
same direction. This study focuses on the significant forces that collectively dictate
standardized or adapted strategies since these emerge as common after the cross-case
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
analysis.
Moreover, Vrontis (2003) and Vrontis et al. (2009) have also noted that international
marketing decisions do not follow an “either/or” approach with standardization
and adaptation being exclusive of each other. Rather, real-life decisions will almost
inevitably incorporate both standardized and adapted elements concurrently. For
example, product decisions may tend to be more standardized but at the same time
pricing decisions may tend to be adapted to local conditions. Moreover, even within each
marketing mix element, both standardized and adapted elements are often found. As
Vrontis (2003) indicates, within, e.g. promotion, adaptation is mostly applicable to sales
promotion, public relations and personal selling whereas this is less evident in direct
marketing and advertising. The standardization/adaptation framework, however, is
often portrayed as a dichotomy in the literature with many authors advocating one or the
other approach and this may mislead the reader. Thus, it is important to note that firms
do not exclusively adopt either standardization or adaptation across their marketing
program or even within each marketing mix element (Vrontis, 2003; Gabrielsson and
Gabrielsson, 2004; Vrontis and Papasolomou, 2005; Soufani et al., 2006).
This study, through an inductive, exploratory mode of investigation aims to identify
which significant reasons indeed come into play when FMCG firms choose their
promotional channel strategy in a typical Mediterranean country such as Greece.
Building on Eisenhardt and Graebner (2007), a model is developed and a posteriori
propositions are generated that reflect the way FMCG firms deal with the contextual
idiosyncrasy of a tourism-oriented market. However, before presenting findings and the
emerging model, the chosen methodology is explained.
4. Methodology
A qualitative approach was deemed as more appropriate because of the non-typical,
under-studied context of the project. Indeed, culturally idiosyncratic markets such as
those identified in Euro-Mediterranean countries are rarely investigated through
a multi-cultural lens (with exceptions such as Poulis and Yamin, 2009). The decision
to embark on a case-based methodology matches with the fundamental objective
of qualitative research (Hyde, 2000; Silverman, 2000), which is to uncover and
illuminate contextual particularities, i.e. in this case, to gain a deeper understanding
EMJB of the interrelationships that shape practices of FMCG firms in a typical “international”
6,1 environment. Therefore, at this point, it must be noted that the purpose of this research is
not to measure causal relationships but rather to explore an unknown phenomenon
through the integration of in-depth views as expressed by respondents. In this respect,
a qualitative, case study-based methodology is adopted, which is the preferred
methodology when currently unexplored and/or complex phenomena need to be studied,
12 and especially when questions of how and why need to be asked (Eisenhardt and
Graebner, 2007; Yin, 2003; Miles and Huberman, 1994).
The study followed a literal replication logic, i.e. each case was selected because it
predicts similar results (Alam, 2005; Johnston et al., 1999). These similar results refer to
FMCG organizations which acknowledge the effect of inward tourism on their
operations. This focus resulted to the selection of 14 firms operating in Greece, for which
the influence of tourism on their promotional strategy is clearly manifested. In order to
have an as maximum variation of sample as possible, the research included packaged
food (F), fast-food (FR) firms, cosmetics (C) and beverages (B) firms, i.e. a wide range of
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
FMCG firms. The focus is on these cases because the main consideration was to use a
sample that was purposefully suited to explore the questions through information-rich
cases (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007; Yin, 2003; Patton, 1990).
In order to enhance the robustness of the sampling framework and consequently the
arguments, the study had to focus on firms which are explicitly influenced by
tourism-induced heterogeneity but at the same time, they are also active in the market
throughout the year. In other words, opportunistic or temporary, sporadic players which
tailor their offering to tourists “by default” cannot be relevant for this study. Relevant
firms were identified by a mixture of techniques (corporate databases, corporate web
sites, four pilot studies) but the most concrete channels to identify them was through
direct observation in diverse retailing outlets of tourism- and non-tourism-related areas
of Greece. Three major types of outlets that can be found in both areas (mini-markets,
convenience stores and kiosks) were visited twice a year by the researchers and a
structured recording of brands that were identified in both areas took place. This
allowed a comparison between brands:
.
sold by firms to locals only; and
.
brands sold to both locals and foreigners.
The process informed researchers on which are the firms that are affected by both
consumer groups. This method resulted to a relevant list of 157 firms, which are influenced
sales-wise by the idiosyncratic character of the market and by both consumer groups.
Out of these firms, sampled firms were chosen based on a maximum variation
(Patton, 1990) logic with the effort to have firms across major FMCG industries. Firms
offered 43 in-depth interviews of almost one hour and a half each and respondents
included trade and marketing directors, senior brand managers, group product
managers, regional sales managers and similar staff from the sales or marketing
departments of firms. This managerial diversity of respondents stems from the request
to firms to “nominate” the respondents themselves. After explaining the nature
and scope of the investigation, firms decided on who are the most suitable managers to
answer this study’s questions.
Individual in-depth interviews were conducted, which are credited as being a largely
valid method of data collection especially, in the international business field
(Marschan-Piekkari et al., 2004; Yeung, 1995). The richness of information they provided, Promotional
the much-needed empathy and direct communication that the interviewer developed with channels of
respondents, the control over the data collection procedure and the chance for dissolving
ambiguity or probing further analysis in the view of the present researcher have FMCG firms
compensated for the drawbacks of cost and time that this approach usually entails (Hall and
Rist, 1999). Interviews started with unstructured questions and allowed respondents to
freely express their knowledge and experience regarding the topic of investigation. The 13
questions did not reduce the flexibility that is required in a qualitative study and were
susceptible to changes during the interview that allowed expansion and better illustration
of responses.
Data analysis commenced with the transcription of interviews and then, data
reduction took place with the purpose of “selecting, focusing, simplifying, abstracting
and transforming the data” (Miles and Huberman, 1994, p. 10). The selection of the
relevant parts of the interviews was a cyclical process that sharpened the analysis and
organized data in such a way that meaningful excerpts were immediately evident to the
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
authors. Analysis of each case followed and the responses to questions reflected a clear
reference to the way tourism influences selection of promotional channels.
FR1 U
FR2
FR3 U
FR4 U
F1 U
F2 U
F3 U
F4 U
F5 U
B1 U
B2 U
C1 U
C2 U Table II.
C3 U Channels of promotion
Total 4 10 by sampled firms
EMJB the firm utilizes promotional channels such as television or radio, during summer,
6,1 a large part of promotional activity takes place through non-conventional channels that
are never used during winter. The following quotes are characteristic:
We cannot use, radio, television, etc. So, the channels are usually outdoor advertising or
collaborations with tour operators such as TUI, which brings masses of tourists into the
country. We also have collaborations with, e.g. rent-a-car offices; we have a joint promotion
14 where we both win. These are tactics that ‘run’ regularly in areas like these (Marketing
Supervisor in a food retailing company).
There was a leaflet distributed in X,Y,Z (airline firms) with a printed map of the country at
the back. On it, there were the spots where FR2 is located; and at the front, it was written what
FR2 is all about. We estimate that through this medium, the message of what FR2 is reached
2.5 million people (Marketing Supervisor in a food retailing company).
the latter, we almost exclusively use above-the-line activities (Group Product Manager in a
packaged food company).
In tourist areas [. . .] we use special promotions with samples, gifts, etc. For example, we have
more promo-packs, which means ‘when buying two brands you get two miniatures as gifts’
[. . .] Within outlets in tourist areas, we also pay attention to the aesthetic part. For example,
we have placed a beautician in the outlets in Santorini and Mykonos constantly promoting
brands for three months. Thus, we had a more specialized promotional strategy in areas with
high tourism activity (Group Product Manager in a cosmetics firm).
Therefore, firms have exercised innovative ways to exploit promotional opportunities
among tourists under conditions of limited time, non-traditional use of channels and
clustered target groups. Empirically grounded data have identified channels such as the
following:
.
in-store promotion is heavily used as it is one of the few instances where firms
have the opportunity to come into contact with prospective consumers;
.
road signage is especially utilized by fast food chains who need to showcase their
location within tourists’ limited time of stay;
.
gates of entrance are used for their enhanced visibility among foreign consumers;
and
.
tourism firms/organizations such as airlines, passenger ships or tour operators
are seen as prime channels of promotion since they are part of the “tourists’ trail”.
The few firms that followed a standardized approach and kept using the same
channels of promotion did so because they believe that promotion adaptation is not
as effective as distribution adaptation. Thus, they preferred to standardize their
promotional channels and invest the relevant budget on tailoring their distribution
channels to the specificities of the tourist market (e.g. tailoring the choice of
middlemen):
The effort is to reach the trade and not promote among consumers. Thus, we standardize our
promotional strategy and we prefer to invest the amount that we save on expanding our
distribution base (Group Product Manager in a cosmetics company).
At this point, building on aforementioned findings, the following propositions can be Promotional
suggested: channels of
P1. FMCG firms operating in a tourism-oriented environment adapt the FMCG firms
promotional channels they use in order to promote their brands among tourists.
P2. FMCG firms operating in a tourism-oriented environment use a new mix of
above and below-the-line activities to promote their brands among tourists as 15
opposed to an exclusive use of above-the-line activities that is used for the
permanent population.
P3. FMCG firms operating in a tourism-oriented environment will use the same,
standardized promotional channels as with the permanent population
whenever other marketing mix elements are considered more critical for the
effectiveness of marketing strategy
P3 introduces the RQ2, i.e. the reasons behind the choice of primarily adapted
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
.
high seasonality of the tourism phenomenon in Greece:
The selection of channels through which we communicate our brands to incoming tourists
is largely dictated by seasonality. As you probably know, the vast majority of incoming
tourists in the country come during summer. This, by default, means that we must
adapt our promotional strategy to meet the peculiarities stemming from this seasonality.
This is the first factor we consider in conjunction with the geographical allocation of
tourists.
.
the limited length of tourists’stay in the country:
Each tourist stays here for approximately ten days. If we do not tailor our channels to this
length of stay, then we have no chance to establish any kind of promotional contact with
them (tourists) (Group Product Manager in a packaged food company).
Owing to these forces, promotional channels reflect geographical and time
considerations that firms have when promoting their brands among non-permanent,
mobile consumers. For example, the distinct travel path of tourists and their limited
spatial behavior actually means that firms that want to communicate their brands
to these tourists must follow the latters’ “trail”. Such observations are in line with the
need for fit between deployed strategies and environmental contingencies that several
studies have pointed out in the strategic management (Venkatraman and Prescott,
1990) and international marketing literatures (Okazaki et al., 2006; Katsikeas et al., 2006).
EMJB If firms, especially those operating in Mediterranean resorts, ignore the local peculiarities
6,1 and the unique environmental characteristics of a tourism-oriented environment, they
will fail to communicate what they need across the millions of tourists who visit their
markets of operation. At this point, therefore, the following propositions can be put
forward:
P4. The travel path of tourists dictates adaptation of promotional channels for a
16 FMCG firm operating in a tourism-oriented environment.
P5. The length of stay of tourists dictates adaptation of promotional channels for
a FMCG firm operating in a tourism-oriented environment.
P6. The seasonality of tourism dictates adaptation of promotional channels for a
FMCG firm operating in a tourism-oriented environment.
As a result of the heavy influence of contextual factors on promotional strategy,
traditional factors that can be found in the international promotional literature such as
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
Perceived importance
of other marketing mix elements
Standardization
Adaptation
Figure 1.
Standardization/
adaptation of promotional
channels for FMCGs in a
tourism-oriented market
Length of stay Seasonality Travel path
6. Discussion Promotional
The international marketing literature has identified many families of variables channels of
that affect SA promotional strategies by firms. The nature of the product, cultural
inducements, competitive structures and intensity of competition, organizational FMCG firms
considerations and infrastructure-related inhibitors/facilitators largely influence
promotional decisions (Okazaki et al., 2006; Harvey, 1993). Despite the prevalence of
cultural heterogeneity in the context of this paper, though, cultural forces have not 17
influenced the decisions of firms towards promotional strategy-making. This is not to
claim that cultural inducements do not influence promotional decisions towards either
standardization or adaptation. The literature has manifested this in a robust way across
different product categories with cultural forces being omnipresent and featuring in a
large number of both empirical and conceptual studies (Chung, 2007; Singh et al., 2005;
Vrontis, 2003; Koudelova and Whitelock, 2001; Whitelock and Rey, 1998). However,
it seems that, paradoxically, culture’s influence becomes less relevant in a multi-cultural
market as a result of international tourism.
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
(iii) The particular role of tourism in the development and structure of Mediterranean
markets
Even more specifically, the Euro-Mediterranean region is the largest recipient of the
world’s tourist inflows and countries such as France or Spain feature as the most popular
destinations on earth. Therefore, the aforementioned two observations become even more
important in this region, whose economic prosperity is partly dependent on tourism.
For the three reasons above, any study that provides a deeper insight on how consumer
mobility to Mediterranean countries affects the operational activity of non-tourism-related
firms is of critical weight. Currently, this knowledge is limited despite indications from
the literature that tourism can, e.g. act as leverage for consumer goods firms’ domestic Promotional
sales performance and internationalization processes (Poulis and Yamin, 2009). channels of
Despite this contribution though, the study has its own limitations. Apparently, the
exploratory nature of this investigation does not allow any generalizations to be made. FMCG firms
More research is needed across similar contexts and only then one will be able to draw
generalized conclusions on the causal relationships between factors and strategies
that work out in such a contextually idiosyncratic environment. For the time being, 19
the outcomes of the current paper can be only utilized as a generic guideline for
firms/researchers operating/investigating similar contexts and should not be seen in a
prescriptive fashion. This is a serious limitation of the current study that must be taken
into consideration by readers.
In this respect, a future study could investigate the developed propositions
and measure causal relationships between SA strategies and factors informing them.
Even more specifically, a large-scale survey conducted across countries with similar
characteristics could yield more grounded insights that will counterbalance the inherent
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
limitations of this effort. Contexts such as France, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus, Malta
and even Mexico, Thailand and Malaysia are popular tourist destinations and several
non-tourism-related firms are interested in how tourism affects their operations.
Therefore, a cross-country investigation with a quantitative research design is a
meaningful research path for the future.
Moreover, a future study could focus on other elements of the promotional mix such
as the message that is used to position the FMCG firm in foreign consumers’ minds.
Perhaps, with regards to this element, the cultural heterogeneity of a tourism-oriented
environment is more influential and dictates the positioning strategy of the firm.
Additionally, the focus could be extended to other marketing mix elements such as price
and distribution. It must be noted therefore, that the lack of focus on product, price and
distribution in this study does not deny their significance in the marketing program of a
firm. Actually, implications for the entire marketing mix were discussed during
interviews with selected firms. However, authors decided that the analytical focus of this
study should be on promotional channels for reasons of conceptual clarity and because
the SA debate is mostly associated with this more controllable element of the marketing
mix (e.g. Fastoso and Whitelock, 2007; Calantone et al., 2006).
Through a synthesis of different insights from additional studies, future researchers
will be able to obtain a more holistic view on the unique characteristics of
tourism-oriented markets. Especially, for Mediterranean countries where these markets
are dominant, such a synthesis promises managerially relevant and research-wise
interesting results. Authors hope that the present effort opens an initial path for the
better appreciation of the unique forces that come into play in these countries.
References
Agrawal, M. (1995), “Review of a 40-year debate in international advertising: practitioner and
academician perspectives to the standardization/adaptation issue”, International
Marketing Review, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 26-48.
Akaah, I.P. (1991), “Strategy standardisation in international marketing”, Journal of Global
Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 39-62.
Alam, I. (2005), “Fieldwork and data collection in qualitative marketing research”, Qualitative
Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 97-112.
EMJB Barney, J., Wright, M. and Ketchen, D. Jr (2001), “The resource-based view of the firm: ten years
after”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 625-41.
6,1
Boddewyn, J.J. and Grosse, R. (1995), “American marketing in the European Union:
standardization’s uneven progress (1973-1993)”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29
No. 12, pp. 23-42.
Boddewyn, J.J., Soehl, R. and Picard, J. (1986), “Standardization in international marketing:
20 is Ted Levitt in fact right?”, Business Horizons, Vol. 29, pp. 69-75.
Buzzell, R.D. (1968), “Can you standardize multinational marketing?”, Harvard Business Review,
Vol. 46, November-December, pp. 102-13.
Cadogan, J.W., Diamantopoulos, A. and Siguaw, J.A. (2002), “Export market-oriented activities:
their antecedents and performance consequences”, Journal of International Business
Studies, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 615-26.
Calantone, R.J., Kim, D., Schmidt, J.B. and Cavusgil, S.T. (2006), “The influence of internal and
external factors on international product adaptation strategy and export performance:
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
Powers, T.L. and Loyka, J.L. (2007), “Market, industry, and company influences on global
product standardization”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 678-94.
Rau, P.A. and Preble, J.F. (1987), “Standardisation of marketing strategy by multinationals”,
International Marketing Review, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 18-28.
Ricks, D.A. (1993), Blunders in International Business, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
Rosen, B.N. (1990), “Global products: when do they make strategic sense?”, Advances in
International Marketing, Vol. 4, pp. 57-71.
Samiee, S. and Roth, K. (1992), “The influence of global marketing standardisation on
performance”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, pp. 1-17.
Sandler, D.M. and Shani, D. (1992), “Brand globally but advertise locally? An empirical
investigation”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 18-31.
Silverman, D. (2000), Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook, Sage, London.
Singh, N., Kumar, V. and Baack, D. (2005), “Adaptation of cultural content: evidence from B2C
e-commerce firms”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 Nos 1/2, pp. 71-86.
Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. (1994), “Does competitive environment moderate the market
orientation-performance relationship?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 46-55.
Solberg, C.A. (2002), “The perennial issue of adaptation or standardization of international
marketing communication: organizational contingencies and performance”, Journal of
International Marketing, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 1-21.
Sorenson, R.Z. and Wiechmann, U.E. (1975), “How multinationals view marketing
standardization”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 38-51.
Soufani, K., Vrontis, D. and Poutziouris, P. (2006), “Private equity for small firms: a conceptual
model of adaptation versus standardization strategy”, International Journal of
Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 3 Nos 3/4, pp. 498-515.
Theodosiou, M. and Katsikeas, C.S. (2001), “Factors influencing the degree of international
pricing strategy standardization of multinational corporations”, Journal of International
Marketing, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 1-18.
Theodosiou, M. and Leonidou, L.C. (2003), “Standardization versus adaptation of international
marketing strategy: an integrative assessment of the empirical research”, International
Business Review, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 141-71.
Venkatraman, N. and Prescott, J.E. (1990), “Environment-strategy coalignment: an empirical test
of its performance implications”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 1-23.
Vrontis, D. (2003), “Integrating adaptation and standardisation in international marketing: Promotional
the AdaptStand modelling process”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 19 Nos 3/4,
pp. 283-305. channels of
Vrontis, D. and Papasolomou, I. (2005), “The use of entry methods in identifying multinational FMCG firms
companies’ AdaptStand behaviour in foreign markets”, Review of Business, Vol. 26 No. 1,
pp. 13-20.
Vrontis, D. and Pavlou, P. (2008), “The external environment and its effect on strategic marketing 23
planning: a case study for McDonald’s”, Journal of International Business and
Entrepreneurship Development, Vol. 3 Nos 3/4, pp. 289-307.
Vrontis, D. and Vronti, P. (2004), “Levi Strauss: an international marketing investigation”,
Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 389-98.
Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A. and Lamprianou, I. (2009), “International marketing adaptation versus
standardisation of multinational companies”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 26
Nos 4/5, pp. 477-500.
Whitelock, J. (1987), “Global marketing and the case for international product standardization”,
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)
Corresponding author
Konstantinos Poulis can be contacted at: poulisk@hotmail.com
1. Symeon Mandrinos, Nik Malini Nik Mahdi. 2016. Examining knowledge gap and Psychic Distance
Paradox interdependence. European Business Review 28:1, 96-114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
2. Androniki Kavoura, Aikaterini Stavrianeas. 2015. The importance of social media on holiday visitors’
choices – the case of Athens, Greece. EuroMed Journal of Business 10:3, 360-374. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
3. Christos Sarmaniotis, Costas Assimakopoulos, Eugenia Papaioannou. 2013. Successful implementation
of CRM in luxury hotels: determinants and measurements. EuroMed Journal of Business 8:2, 134-153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Downloaded by VIT University At 02:59 19 March 2016 (PT)