You are on page 1of 5

NEUROLOGY/EXPERT CLINICAL MANAGEMENT

Managing Hypertension in Patients With


Acute Stroke
Michael N. Cocchi, MD*; Jonathan A. Edlow, MD
*Corresponding Author. E-mail: mcocchi@bidmc.harvard.edu, Twitter: @MichaelCocchiMD.

0196-0644/$-see front matter


Copyright © 2019 by the American College of Emergency Physicians.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.09.015

[Ann Emerg Med. 2019;-:1-5.] cerebral blood flow is maintained in a normal range
through vasoconstriction and vasodilation of intracranial
vessels. Because the majority of these patients will not
INTRODUCTION have intracranial pressure monitoring, judgments about
For patients presenting to the emergency department elevated intracranial pressure are based on clinical (eg,
(ED) with acute stroke, treatments in the minutes to hours headache, confusion, vomiting, diplopia) or imaging
after the event can affect outcomes. Patients with acute (obliteration of normal cerebral spinal fluid-filled spaces
stroke often present with elevated blood pressure, which on computed tomography or optic nerve sheath diameter
can exacerbate the underlying pathology and drive by ultrasonography) findings.
therapeutic interventions. This article focuses on the Cerebral perfusion pressure can be manipulated by
current evidence-based approach to blood pressure either decreasing intracranial pressure or increasing mean
management in the setting of acute stroke, including acute arterial blood pressure. Elevating the head of the bed to at
ischemic stroke, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and least 30 degrees is appropriate in most cases when the
intraparenchymal hemorrhage. When direct evidence is intracranial pressure is elevated. Given available data and
lacking, we suggest approaches based on what data do exist, guidelines,3,4 in most cases it is reasonable to maintain the
pathophysiologic principles, and our own practice. Table 1 head elevated at 30 degrees, but individual circumstances
provides a concise summary of existing recommendations may be relevant. For example, a patient with acute ischemic
and targets based on cause. stroke and a flow-limiting stenosis may benefit from flat
positioning, whereas an intracerebral hemorrhage patient
GENERAL PRINCIPLES with known elevated intracranial pressure will need head-
Elevated blood pressure in the setting of acute stroke is of-bed elevation. Care should also be taken to avoid
common. In one national data set of greater than 500,000 reductions in venous return from the head (tight cervical
patients presenting to the ED with stroke, nearly 60% had collars or central line dressings) that could elevate
elevated blood pressure.1 Another systematic review of 18 intracranial pressure.
studies found that 52% of patients with acute stroke were In regard to manipulations of mean arterial blood
hypertensive at admission.2 pressure, use of short-acting intravenous agents to manage
Acute blood pressure management in the setting of blood pressure and continuous infusions that can be
acute intracranial pathology centers around the principle carefully titrated may be advantageous in the acute setting
of optimizing cerebral perfusion pressure, which can be (Table 2).
affected by both the mean arterial blood pressure and the
intracranial pressure, as represented by the following Acute Ischemic Stroke
formula: cerebral perfusion pressure¼mean arterial blood The optimal blood pressure management strategy in
pressure–intracranial pressure. As the intracranial acute ischemic stroke remains controversial, in part because
pressure increases, the mean arterial blood pressure must of a lack of clear evidence based on randomized controlled
be maintained at a level that ensures adequate cerebral trial data. Balancing preservation of perfusion to the
perfusion pressure. Autoregulation is the physiologic cerebral ischemic (but not yet infarcted) penumbra to avoid
process by which blood flow in a given circulation (in extension of the infarct with the risk of hemorrhagic
this case, cerebral) is maintained over a wide range of conversion is the goal, both of which can result in worsened
systemic blood pressure. When autoregulation is intact, neurologic outcomes.

Volume -, no. - : - 2019 Annals of Emergency Medicine 1


Managing Hypertension in Patients With Acute Stroke Cocchi & Edlow

Table 1. Guideline-recommended blood pressure targets.


Stroke Type Target, mm Hg Notes
Acute ischemic stroke
IV tPA eligible5 <185/110
During/after tPA 5
<180/105 AHA/ASA recommendations are to monitor BP every 15 min for 2 h, then every 30 min
for 6 h, and then hourly until 24 h.
No tPA5 <220/120
Mechanical BP 180/105 Maintain this range during and for 24 h after the procedure.
thrombectomy5
Aneurysmal subarachnoid
hemorrhage
Unsecured15 SBP <160 Some experts advocate <140 mm Hg; other recommendations include mean arterial
blood pressure <110 mm Hg, SBP <160 mm Hg,16 or both, or SBP target of <180
mm Hg.17
Secured Unclear May depend on patient-specific factors such as premorbid blood pressure and
presence of vasospasm.
Intraparenchymal
hemorrhage
Initial SBP 150 to 220 Aim for SBP <140 mm Hg
mm Hg21
Initial SBP >220 mm Aim for SBP 140–160 mm Hg
Hg21

IV, Intravenous; BP, blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

For acute ischemic stroke, blood pressure targets will be first 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke.5 The data on
determined by whether the patient is eligible for treatment which the recommendation is made are limited because
with systemic thrombolysis. For acute ischemic stroke these patients have been excluded from clinical trials
patients not undergoing intravenous alteplase or evaluating blood pressure lowering after acute ischemic
endovascular therapy, there is a 2018 Class IIb American stroke, so clinical judgment will be necessary, and
Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association treatment should be individualized. In patients with various
(ASA) position that states that it is reasonable for patients comorbid conditions, such as acute coronary syndrome or
with blood pressure greater than 220/120 mm Hg to heart failure, the decisionmaking involved in blood pressure
experience a decrease in blood pressure of 15% within the management may be driven by these other conditions.
Table 2. Commonly used medications for blood pressure management in acute stroke.
Agent Typical Dose/Range Notes Cautions/Contraindications
Labetalol 10–20 mg IV during 1–2 min; may Onset of action 5 min Avoid use in COPD, asthma, heart failure,
repeat 1 time bradycardia, heart block
Nicardipine IV infusion at 5 mg/h; titrate up by Onset of action 1–5 Avoid in severe aortic stenosis
2.5 mg/h every 5–15 min; min
maximum 15 mg/h
Clevidipine 1–2 mg/h IV; titrate by doubling the Onset of action 2–4 Do not use in patients with egg/soy allergy
dose every 2–5 min until desired min; short half-life because of lipid emulsion carrier
BP reached; maximum 21 mg/h Avoid in severe aortic stenosis
Hydralazine 10–20 mg IV; repeat every 4–6 h Onset of action 10– Can cause reflex tachycardia
20 min
Other agents (eg,
enalaprilat, esmolol)
may also be considered

COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

2 Annals of Emergency Medicine Volume -, no. - : - 2019


Cocchi & Edlow Managing Hypertension in Patients With Acute Stroke

Current AHA/ASA guidelines suggest that decreasing the Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo trial,
blood pressure by 15% in these scenarios is probably safe which randomized patients with an occlusion of the
(Class I). It is important to understand that overtreatment intracranial internal carotid artery, the first segment of the
(decreasing the blood pressure too much) risks worsening middle cerebral artery, or both, and mismatch between
cerebral ischemia,6 and this should be considered when clinical deficit severity and infarct volume, to
medications are titrated. In the China Antihypertensive thrombectomy plus standard care versus standard care
Trial in Acute Stroke, 4,071 patients who presented within alone, recommended maintaining systolic blood pressure at
48 hours of onset of an acute ischemic stroke, with an less than 140 mm Hg in the first 24 hours after reperfusion
elevated blood pressure between 140 and 220 mm Hg, from mechanical thrombectomy.9
were randomized to either antihypertensive treatment There are no data to favor one agent over another for
(decreasing by 10% to 25% within the first 24 hours after decreasing blood pressure after acute ischemic stroke.
randomization to achieve less than 140/90 mm Hg within The most common choices are titratable infusions such
7 days and maintaining that throughout the as nicardipine or clevidipine, but bolus dosing of agents
hospitalization) or the control arm (not receiving such as labetalol is also reasonable (Table 2). Although
antihypertensive treatment, including discontinuation of not specific to stroke, a 2011 multicenter randomized
home antihypertensive medications). There was no controlled trial compared use of nicardipine infusion
significant difference in primary outcome composite versus labetalol bolus dosing for undifferentiated
measure of death or major disability at day 14 or hospital hypertensive emergency in 226 patients and found that
discharge between groups.7 patients who received nicardipine were 2.7 times more
For patients who are potentially eligible for treatment likely to be in target blood pressure range within 30
with intravenous alteplase, the systolic blood pressure minutes compared with those treated with labetalol. In
should be maintained at less than 185 mm Hg and the this trial, overshooting of blood pressure targets was less
diastolic blood pressure at less than 110 mm Hg (Class I than 15% with either medication, and no evidence of
ASA/AHA recommendation). During or after infusion of significant harm was found with either agent.10 In the
a thrombolytic agent, the recommendation is to maintain absence of compelling evidence of superiority, clinicians
blood pressure at less than 180/105 mm Hg. The exact may need to consider resources available, as well as other
blood pressure at which the risk of hemorrhage increases patient-specific parameters such as pulse rate, when
in the setting of systemic thrombolysis is currently deciding on the agent to use. In most cases, we generally
unknown and may differ from patient to patient. In the prefer nicardipine or clevidipine for blood pressure
absence of new and more compelling data, it is management when necessary in acute ischemic stroke,
reasonable to use the blood pressure parameters used in given the ease of titration with these agents.
the original trials.5
For patients who are undergoing mechanical
thrombectomy, there are very limited data about the Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
optimal blood pressure targets during and after the The most feared complication of an aneurysmal
procedure; there is a new Class IIa recommendation for subarachnoid hemorrhage is rebleeding, which may have an
maintaining the blood pressure at less than or equal to 180/ incidence of up to 15% within the first 24 hours and carries
105 mm Hg during and for 24 hours after the procedure.5 with it significant morbidity and mortality, with a fatality
In the Randomized Assessment of Rapid Endovascular rate as high as 70% described.11-13 Despite recognition of
Treatment of Ischemic Stroke trial, patients with a risk of this complication, evidence supporting a specific
proximal intracranial occlusion in the anterior circulation blood pressure management strategy that can reduce this
up to 12 hours after onset were randomized to standard danger is limited, and there remains large variability in
care alone versus standard care plus endovascular therapy blood pressure targets used in this subset of intracerebral
(mechanical thrombectomy); that protocol advised hemorrhage. In one survey study of 128 clinicians (mostly
maintaining systolic blood pressure at greater than 150 mm neurointensivists), systolic blood pressure targets ranged
Hg to maintain flow through collateral vessels, and then in from 140 to 180 mm Hg before aneurysm securement and
the postprocedure period aiming for a target that would be 160 to 240 mm Hg postsecurement.14 The current AHA/
considered normal for the individual patient.8 The ASA guidelines suggest a target of systolic blood pressure
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging or Computerized less than 160 mm Hg before aneurysm securement (Class
Tomography Perfusion Assessment With Clinical IIa, Level of Evidence C),15 whereas the Neurocritical Care
Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-up and Late Presenting Society consensus recommendations endorsed a target of

Volume -, no. - : - 2019 Annals of Emergency Medicine 3


Managing Hypertension in Patients With Acute Stroke Cocchi & Edlow

mean arterial blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg, systolic authors identified improvement in functional outcomes as
blood pressure less than 160 mm Hg, or both.16 European measured by modified Rankin Scale scores in the more
guidelines have been more liberal, with a systolic blood intensive control group.23 The Antihypertensive Treatment
pressure target of less than 180 mm Hg.17 of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II trial was a randomized
Given the paucity of data for specific targets, there is controlled trial of 1,000 patients presenting with
even less guidance on specific agents to achieve blood intracerebral hemorrhage that compared an intensive blood
pressure control in this population. As with patients with pressure range of systolic blood pressure 110 to 139 mm
acute ischemic stroke, use of easily titratable agents may be Hg with a more standard-care range of systolic blood
preferred, and we generally prefer nicardipine or pressure 140 to 179 mm Hg; this trial was stopped early for
clevidipine. futility according to a prespecified interim analysis that
demonstrated no difference in mortality or disability
between the groups. There were more renal adverse events
Intracerebral Hemorrhage noted in the intensive treatment group.24
For patients presenting with an intracerebral Guidelines offer a data-driven framework to make
hemorrhage not related to an aneurysm or other vascular decisions, but by necessity, they suggest general approaches
malformation, the focus is on blood pressure management, to individual patients. Target blood pressure goals should
with a concern for worsening the hemorrhage, although the be tailored to individual patients, accounting for baseline
evidence for particular targets is limited. Hematoma growth premorbid blood pressure levels, the likelihood of elevated
is a predictor of morbidity and mortality after intracerebral intracranial pressure, and comorbid conditions. When
hemorrhage, and elevated blood pressure in this context has appropriate, intracranial pressure monitoring allows
been associated with hematoma enlargement.18-20 clinicians to more rationally decide on a target blood
The majority of these patients will not have intracranial pressure for the individual patient.
pressure monitoring devices, and therefore accounting for
elevations in intracranial pressure must be made on clinical
VASOACTIVE MEDICATIONS
and neuroimaging factors. In accordance with the most up-
Choice of agent used to manage blood pressure in the
to-date 2015 guidelines from the AHA/ASA, for patients
acute stroke setting may be based on patient-specific
who present with a systolic blood pressure 150 to 220 mm
factors, and clinical judgment in the overall context of the
Hg without a clear contraindication for acute blood pressure
patient scenario is important. Using a titratable infusion
treatment, immediate reduction to 140 mm Hg is likely safe
such as nicardipine or clevidipine may be preferable to a
(Class I; LOE A) and may improve functional outcome
bolus-dosing agent to more carefully achieve the desired
(Class IIa; LOE B). For patients with systolic blood pressure
response. In a small (n¼54) pseudorandomized trial of
greater than 220 mm Hg, reduction in the blood pressure
nicardipine versus labetalol, patients who received
with a titratable infusion and frequent blood pressure
nicardipine had more effective blood pressure management
monitoring is recommended, with a target of systolic blood
and demonstrated a more reliable dose response.25
pressure 140 to 160 mm Hg (Class IIb; LOE C).21
Clevidipine, which is notable for its rapid onset of action
Data from recent trials support these recommendations.
and short half-life, has demonstrated efficacy in achieving
The Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral
target blood pressure in spontaneous intracerebral
Hemorrhage trial, a randomized pilot study of 204 patients
hemorrhage.26 In general, nitroprusside is avoided in
who presented with intracerebral hemorrhage,
neurocritically ill patients because of its potential to
demonstrated that rapid reduction to a target of systolic
increase intracranial pressure.27 Regardless of the agent
blood pressure 140 mm Hg within 6 hours was safe.22 In
used, it is important to monitor the response closely and
this trial, the authors also found that there was a reduction
avoid inadvertent hypotension.
in hematoma growth in the intensive target group,
although this did not achieve statistical significance. The
follow-up trial randomized 2,839 patients with acute SUMMARY
intracerebral hemorrhage and elevated blood pressure to Optimal blood pressure targets in the setting of acute
either intensive blood pressure management (systolic blood ischemic stroke, acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, and
pressure 140 mm Hg within 1 hour) or more standard spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage remain somewhat
blood pressure management (systolic blood pressure 180 controversial, and the evidence is evolving. Guidelines offer
mm Hg) and found no difference in mortality, severe a data-driven framework to make decisions, but by
disability, or adverse events. In a secondary analysis, the necessity, they suggest general approaches to individual

4 Annals of Emergency Medicine Volume -, no. - : - 2019


Cocchi & Edlow Managing Hypertension in Patients With Acute Stroke

patients. Target blood pressure goals should be informed by Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes
Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo (DAWN) trial methods. Int J
existing evidence-based guidelines but tailored to individual Stroke. 2017;12:641-652.
patients. 10. Peacock WF, Varon J, Baumann BM, et al. CLUE: a randomized
comparative effectiveness trial of IV nicardipine versus labetalol use in
the emergency department. Crit Care. 2011;15:R157.
Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD. Specific detailed
11. de Oliveira Manoel AL, Goffi A, Marotta TR, et al. The critical care
information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage. Crit Care.
is available at https://www.annemergmed.com/editors. 2016;20:21.
12. Germans MR, Coert BA, Vandertop WP, et al. Time intervals from
Author affiliations: From the Department of Emergency Medicine
subarachnoid hemorrhage to rebleed. J Neurol. 2014;261:1425-1431.
(Cocchi, Edlow) and Department of Anesthesia Critical Care, 13. Starke RM, Connolly ES Jr; Participants in the International Multi-
Division of Critical Care (Cocchi), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Disciplinary Consensus Conference on the Critical Care Management
Center, Boston, MA. of Subarachnoid H. Rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid
hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:241-246.
Authorship: All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org
14. Brown RJ, Kumar A, McCullough LD, et al. A survey of blood pressure
authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception
parameters after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Int J
or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation Neurosci. 2017;127:51-58.
of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it 15. Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the
critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for
of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/
accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711-1737.
related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are 16. Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Claude Hemphill J 3rd, et al. Critical care
appropriately investigated and resolved. management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid
hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Neurocrit Care.
disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships 2011;15:211-240.
in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict 17. Steiner T, Juvela S, Unterberg A, et al. European Stroke Organization
of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and
that no such relationships exist. subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35:93-112.
18. Davis SM, Broderick J, Hennerici M, et al. Hematoma growth is a
determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral
REFERENCES hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006;66:1175-1181.
1. Qureshi AI, Ezzeddine MA, Nasar A, et al. Prevalence of elevated blood 19. Ohwaki K, Yano E, Nagashima H, et al. Blood pressure management
pressure in 563,704 adult patients with stroke presenting to the ED in in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship between elevated
the United States. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:32-38. blood pressure and hematoma enlargement. Stroke.
2. Willmot M, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PM. High blood pressure in acute 2004;35:1364-1367.
stroke and subsequent outcome: a systematic review. Hypertension. 20. Rodriguez-Luna D, Rubiera M, Ribo M, et al. Ultraearly hematoma
2004;43:18-24. growth predicts poor outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
3. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. Guidelines for the early Neurology. 2011;77:1599-1604.
management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for 21. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. Guidelines for the
healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/ management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline
American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870-947. for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/
4. Anderson CS, Arima H, Lavados P, et al. Cluster-randomized, crossover American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46:2032-2060.
trial of head positioning in acute stroke. N Engl J Med. 22. Anderson CS, Huang Y, Wang JG, et al. Intensive Blood Pressure
2017;376:2437-2447. Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Trial (INTERACT): a
5. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. 2018 Guidelines for the randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:391-399.
early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline 23. Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, et al. Rapid blood-pressure lowering
for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/ in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med.
American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46-e110. 2013;368:2355-2365.
6. Stead LG, Gilmore RM, Vedula KC, et al. Impact of acute blood 24. Qureshi AI, Palesch YY, Barsan WG, et al. Intensive blood-pressure
pressure variability on ischemic stroke outcome. Neurology. lowering in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med.
2006;66:1878-1881. 2016;375:1033-1043.
7. He J, Zhang Y, Xu T, et al. Effects of immediate blood pressure 25. Liu-DeRyke X, Levy PD, Parker D Jr, et al. A prospective evaluation of
reduction on death and major disability in patients with acute ischemic labetalol versus nicardipine for blood pressure management in
stroke: the CATIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:479-489. patients with acute stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19:41-47.
8. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of 26. Graffagnino C, Bergese S, Love J, et al. Clevidipine rapidly and safely
rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. reduces blood pressure in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: the
2015;372:1019-1030. ACCELERATE trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36:173-180.
9. Jovin TG, Saver JL, Ribo M, et al. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging or 27. Rose JC, Mayer SA. Optimizing blood pressure in neurological
Computerized Tomography Perfusion Assessment With Clinical emergencies. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1:287-299.

Volume -, no. - : - 2019 Annals of Emergency Medicine 5

You might also like