Technological Institute of the Philippines

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
OF VARIED ATTRIBUTES
SCORES
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

In the previous section, results of real comparison on each processes’

scores were shown using Single-Factor and Two-Factor Sensitivity Analysis

method. However, the scores of the other processes were not comparable enough

to those of Process 1. In this part, lowest scores obtained by Process 2 and Process

3 were changed, correspondingly these changes caused some of the attributes’

scores to be changed as well. Impacts on the processes were tabulated.

Table 6.81 Summary of varied scores on each process

Stirring- Neutralization
Calcination
CRITERIA Crystallization of Sulfuric Acid
Process
Technique Process
For P21, the raw
For P11, the raw For P31, the raw
materials needed
materials needed materials needed
are magnesium
are dolomite and are magnesite
hydroxide and
sulfuric acid, and sulfuric acid,
sulfuric acid,
Price of Raw which are priced which are priced
which are priced
Materials at at
at
₱ 2,706.88/ton ₱ 34,835.17/ton
₱ 25,000.00/ton
and and
and
₱ 20,341.71/ton ₱ 20,341.71/ton
₱ 20,341.71/ton
respectively. respectively.
respectively.
The total capital

The total capital investment for

The total capital
investment for P21 was changed
Total Capital investment for
P11 remained at from
Investment P31 remained at
₱ ₱ 255,842,129.61
to ₱ 240,184,674.01
184,316,219.71.
₱ 230,426,741.06

The Total Annual The Total Annual

Total Annual The Total Annual
Production Cost Production Cost
Production Cost Production Cost
for P11 remained for P11 remained

43
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

at ₱ for P21 changed at

158,370,924.68 from ₱192,690,118.04.
₱ 202,308,269.33
to
₱ 186,110,244.93

The number of
No. of Energy No changes were energy intensive No changes were
Intensive made, remained equipment made, remained
Equipment at 5. changed from 5 at 2.
to 3.
For P11, the For P21, , the For P11, the
operating operating operating
temperature and temperature and temperature and
pressure pressure pressure
Operating
remained which remained which remained which
Parameters
ranges from 20 to ranges from 30 to ranges from 40 to
100 oC and 0.5 to 500 oC and 0.5 to 200 oC and 0.5 to
1 bar 2 bar 1 bar
respectively. respectively. respectively.
The Level of
PPE for P31
The Level of The Level of
remained the
PPE for P11 PPE for P21
same which is
Health Hazard remained the remained the
Level C, but the
same which is same which is
rating changed
Level C. Level B.
from 2.00 to
3.00.
No changes No changes
Toxicological The rating for
made, remained made, remained
Rating P31 is 2.50
at 2.75 at 2.20
Scores for this Scores for this Scores for this
Availability of
criterion remains criterion remains criterion remains
Raw Materials
the same the same the same
No changes were No changes were No changes were
Environmental
made, remained made, remained made, remained
Hazards
at 1.55 at 1.70 at 1.85

44
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.81.1 Quantitative Summary for the three varied processes’ evaluation

ATTRIBUTES P1 P2 P3
Economics (Php, ₱)
Price of Raw Materials 23,048.59 45,341.71 55,176.88
Total Capital Investment 184,316,219.71 230,426,741.06 240,184,674.01
Total Annual Production
158,370,924.68 186,110,244.93 192,690,118.04
Cost
Manufacturability
Number of intensive
5.00 3.00 2.00
equipment
Safety
Operating parameters 25-100oC 30-500oC 40-200oC
Health Hazard Level C PPE Level B PPE Level C PPE
Toxicological Rating 2.75 2.20 2.50
Sustainability
Availability of Raw
3.00 2.00 2.00
Materials
Environmental Impact
Environmental Hazards 1.55 1.70 1.85

45
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.82.1 Normalized scores of the varied three process

ATTRIBUTES P11 P21 P31

Economics
Price of Raw Materials 3.00 2.57 2.04
Total Capital Investment 3.00 2.94 2.82
Total Annual Production 3.00 2.96 2.86
Manufacturability
Number of intensive equipment 1.20 2.40 3.00
Safety
Operating Parameters 3.00 1.00 2.00
Health Hazard 3.00 2.00 3.00
Toxicological Rating 2.40 3.00 2.64
Sustainability
Availability of Raw Materials 3.00 2.00 2.00
Environmental Impact
Environmental Hazard 3.00 2.61 2.45

The scoring for chosen process was done the same way calculating in

Process Selection section. Table 6.83 shows the scores of the varied attributes

scores for Process 1 (P11), Process 2 (P21), and Process 3 (P31).

46
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.83 Worst-Case and Best-Case Benchmark for each varied attributes
WORST

ECON 1

ECON 2

ECON 3

SAFE 1

SAFE 2

SAFE 3
ATTRIB

MANU
BEST

BEST

BEST

BEST

BEST

BEST

BEST

BEST

BEST
ENVI
SUST
UTES

ECON 1
0.45 0.45 0.45 0.31 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.45 0.45 0.45
ECON 2
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.30
ECON 3
0.60 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.60 0.60 0.59 0.60 0.60 0.60
MANU
0.06 0.06 0.06 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.06
SAFE 1
0.15 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.15
SAFE 2
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.30
SAFE 3
0.24 0.24 0.24 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.30 0.24 0.24 0.24
SUST
0.45 0.45 0.45 0.30 0.45 0.45 0.30 0.45 0.45 0.45
ENVI
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.26 0.30 0.30 0.30

Just like in the table 6.31, Table 6.83 shows the worst – case and best –

case benchmark for each attribute based on the varied scores used in the process

selection.

47
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.84 Scores and weights of varied attributes

LEVEL OF
ATTRIBUTES SCORE WEIGHT
IMPORTANCE
Economics 1 7 87.40 0.16
Economics 2 6 77.77 0.15
Economics 3 9 100.00 0.19
Manufacturability 1 10.00 0.02
Safety 1 2 21.11 0.04
Safety 2 3 36.29 0.07
Safety 3 4 45.92 0.09
Sustainability 8 93.14 0.17
Environmental Impact 5 62.96 0.12
TOTAL 534.59 1.00
Same level of importance and scores were used in determining the chosen

process.

Table 6.85 Process Choice for varied attribute scores

ATTRIBUTES P11 P21 P31

Economics 1 1.00 0.57 0.00
Economics 2 1.00 0.00 0.50
Economics 3 1.00 0.00 0.40
Manufacturability 0.00 0.00 1.00
Safety 1 1.00 0.00 0.50
Safety 2 1.00 0.00 0.00
Safety 3 0.33 1.00 0.00
Sustainability 1.00 0.00 0.00
Environmental Impact 1.00 0.33 0.00
TOTAL 0.92 0.22 0.19
CHOSEN PROCESS P11

After determining the scores of each attribute, we then compared their

newly obtained scores by using Equation 6.2. The chosen process is P11.

48
Technological Institute of the Philippines

SINGLE-FACTOR
METHOD

49
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.86 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Economics 1 Varied Score

BEST ECONOMICS 1
Price of Raw Materials
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P11
800 P11
900 P11
1000 P11
*Base Case score is 87.40

The results in Table 6.86 indicate that the chosen process would still be

Process 1 even if the Best-Economics 1 score is changed from the base case score

of 87.40S. Further increasing the scores even up to 1000, the choice of process is

still Process 1. This implies that the best option in terms of price of raw materials

among the three processes is Process 1 and is the best route for the production of

magnesium sulfate.

50
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.87 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Economics 2 Score

BEST ECONOMICS 2
Total Capital Investment
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P11
800 P11
900 P11
1000 P11
*Base score is 77.77

The results in Table 6.87 indicate that the chosen process would still be

Process 1 even if the Best-Economics 2 score is changed from the base case score

of 77.77. Further increasing the scores even up to 1000, the choice of process is

still Process 1. This implies that the best option in terms of total capital

investment among the three processes is Process 1 and is the best route to produce

magnesium sulfate.

51
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.88 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Economics 3 Score

BEST ECONOMICS 3
Total Annual Production Cost
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P11
800 P11
900 P11
1000 P11
*Base score is 100.00

The results in Table 6.88 indicate that the chosen process would still be

Process 1 even if the Best-Economics 3 score is changed from the base case

score of 100.00. Further increasing the scores even up to 1000, the choice of

process is still Process 1. This implies that the best option in terms of annual

production cost among the three processes is Process 1 and is the best route for

the production of magnesium sulfate.

52
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.89 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Manufacturability Score

BEST MANUFACTURABILITY
No. of Energy Intensive Equipment
SCORE CHOICE
10 P1
20 P1
30 P1
40 P1
50 P1
60 P1
70 P1
80 P1
90 P1
100 P1
200 P1
300 P1
400 P1
500 P3
600 P3
700 P3
800 P3
900 P3
1000 P3
*Base score is 10.00

The results in Table 6.37 indicate with the Manufacturability score of

500, will cause a shift from Process 1 to Process 3. Further increasing of score

value to 1000 will come up with Process 3. It can be assumed that at an analysis

considering manufacturability and holding other attributes constant can result as

best manufacturability for Process 3.

53
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.89 Threshold Values for Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Manufacturability

Score
BEST MANUFACTURABILITY
No. of Energy Intensive Equipment
SCORE CHOICE
401 P11
402 P11
403 P11
404 P11
405 P31
410 P31
420 P31
430 P31
440 P31
450 P31
460 P31
470 P31
480 P31
490 P31
500 P31
600 P31
700 P31
800 P31
900 P31
1000 P31

Table 6.89 shows that at Manufacturability value of 405.00, the choice

of process changes from Process 1 to Process 3. And continuously resulted too

Process 3 upon further increased value.

54
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.90 Ranking at Threshold Values for Sensitivity Analysis of Best-

Manufacturability Score

LEVEL OF
ATTRIBUTES SCORE WEIGHT
IMPORTANCE
Economics 1 7 87.40 0.09
Economics 2 6 77.77 0.08
Economics 3 9 100.00 0.11
Manufacturability 1 405.00 0.44
Safety 1 2 21.11 0.02
Safety 2 3 36.29 0.04
Safety 3 4 45.92 0.05
Sustainability 8 93.14 0.10
Environmental Impact 5 62.96 0.07
TOTAL 929.59 1.00

Table 6.90 shows the ranking of attributes at increased score of

Manufacturability. At this condition, the weight percentage of Economics 3

increased from 2% to 44% which makes it the highest of all attributes. This

leaves other attributes equal or less than 11%. Based on the weight calculated,

the expected process would have:

1. Been well manufactured but is expensive.

2. Considerable impact/damage on the environment.

3. Compromised safety since all safety attributes are of less importance. Commented [JO1]: For edit

Commented [JO2]: For edit

55
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.91 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Safety 1 Score

BEST SAFETY 1
Operating Parameters
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P11
800 P11
900 P11
1000 P11
*Base score is 21.11

The results in Table 6.91 indicate that the chosen process would still be

Process 1 even if the Best-Safety 1 score is changed from the base case score of

21.11. Further increasing the scores even up to 1000, the choice of process is still

Process 1. This implies that the best option in terms of operating parameters

among the three processes is Process 1 and is the best route for the production of

magnesium sulfate.

56
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.92 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Safety 2 Score

BEST SAFETY 2
Health Hazard
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P11
800 P11
900 P11
1000 P11
*Base score is 36.29

The results in Table 6.92 indicate that the chosen process would still be

Process 1 even if the Best-Safety 2 score is changed from the base case score of

36.29. Further increasing the scores even up to 1000, the choice of process is still

Process 1. This implies that the best option in terms of operating parameters

among the three processes is Process 1 and is the best route for the production of

magnesium sulfate.

57
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.93 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Safety 3 Score

BEST SAFETY 3
Toxicological Rating
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P21
800 P21
900 P21
1000 P21
*Base score is 45.92

The results in Table 6.93 indicate with the Toxicological Rating score of

600, will cause a shift from Process 1 to Process 2. Further increasing of score

value to 1000 the choice is still Process 2.

58
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.94 Threshold Values for Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Safety 3 Score

BEST SAFETY 3
Toxicological Rating
SCORE CHOICE
600 P11
601 P11
602 P11
603 P11
604 P11
605 P11
606 P11
607 P11
608 P11
609 P11
610 P21
620 P21
630 P21
640 P21
650 P21
700 P21
800 P21
900 P21
1000 P21

Table 6.94 shows that at Toxicological Rating value of 610.00, the choice

of process changes from Process 1 to Process 2. And continuously resulted too

Process 2 upon further increased value.

59
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.95 Ranking at Threshold Values for Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Safety

3 Score

LEVEL OF
ATTRIBUTES SCORE WEIGHT
IMPORTANCE
Economics 1 7 87.40 0.08
Economics 2 6 77.77 0.07
Economics 3 9 100.00 0.09
Manufacturability 1 10.00 0.01
Safety 1 2 21.11 0.02
Safety 2 3 36.29 0.03
Safety 3 4 610.00 0.56
Sustainability 8 93.14 0.08
Environmental Impact 5 62.96 0.06
TOTAL 1098.67 1.00

Table 6.95 shows the ranking of attributes at increased score of

Toxicological Rating. At this condition, the weight percentage of Safety 3

increased from 9% to 56% which makes it the highest of all attributes. This

leaves other attributes less than 10%. Based on the weight calculated, the

expected process would have:

1. Lesser safety concerns because of much focus on handling.

2. Not sustainable, manufacturable and environmental friendly.

60
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.96 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Sustainability Score

BEST SUSTAINABILITY
Availability of Raw Materials
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P11
800 P11
900 P11
1000 P11
*Base score is 93.14

The results in Table 6.96 indicate that the chosen process would still be

Process 1 even if the Best-Sustainability score is changed from the base case

score of 93.14. Further increasing the scores even up to 1000, the choice of

process is still Process 1. This implies that the best option in terms of operating

parameters among the three processes is Process 1 and is the best route for the

production of magnesium sulfate.

61
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.97 Sensitivity Analysis of Best-Environmental Impact Score

BEST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

Availability of Raw Materials
SCORE CHOICE
10 P11
20 P11
30 P11
40 P11
50 P11
60 P11
70 P11
80 P11
90 P11
100 P11
200 P11
300 P11
400 P11
500 P11
600 P11
700 P11
800 P11
900 P11
1000 P11
*Base score is 62.96

The results in Table 6.97 indicate that the chosen process would still be

Process 1 even if the Best-Sustainability score is changed from the base case

score of 93.14. Further increasing the scores even up to 1000, the choice of

process is still Process 1. This implies that the best option in terms of operating

parameters among the three processes is Process 1 and is the best route for the

production of magnesium sulfate.

62
Technological Institute of the Philippines

TWO-FACTOR
METHOD

63
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.98 Economics 1 – Economics 2 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Economics 2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Economics 2 Base Case Score is 77.77

Table 6.98 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point in

Economics 1 – Economics 2 combination.

64
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.99 Economics 1 – Economics 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Economics 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00

Table 6.99 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point in

Economics 1 – Economics 3 combination.

Table 6.100 Economics 1 – Manufacturability Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Manufacturability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00

Table 6.100 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 1 – Manufacturability combination.

65
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.101 Economics 1 – Safety 1 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Safety 1
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11

Table 6.101 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 1 – Safety 1 combination.

Table 6.102 Economics 1 – Safety 2 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Safety 2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29

Table 6.102 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 1 – Safety 2 combination.

66
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.103 Economics 1 – Safety 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Safety 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Safety 3 Base Case Score is 45.92

Table 6.103 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 1 – Safety 3 combination.

Table 6.104 Economics 1 – Sustainability Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Sustainability Base Case Score is 93.14

Table 6.104 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 1 – Sustainability combination.

67
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.105 Economics 1 –Environmental Impact Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 1 Score
Environmental
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Impact Score
10 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
20 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
30 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
40 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
50 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
60 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
70 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
80 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
90 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
100 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 87.40
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.105 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 1 – Safety 1 combination.

Table 6.106 Economics 2 – Manufacturability Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 2 Score
Economics 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 77.77
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00

Table 6.106 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 2 – Economics 3 combination.

68
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.107 Economics 2 – Manufacturability Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 2 Score
Manufacturability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 2 Base Case Score is 77.77
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00

Table 6.107 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 2 – Manufacturability combination.

Table 6.108 Economics 2 – Safety 1 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 2 Score
Safety 1
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 77.77
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11

Table 6.108 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 2 – Safety 1 combination.

69
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.109 Economics 2 – Safety 2 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 2 Score
Safety 2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 2 Base Case Score is 77.77
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29

Table 6.109 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 2 – Safety 2 combination.

Table 6.110 Economics 2 – Safety 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 2 Score
Safety 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
20 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
30 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
40 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
50 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
60 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
70 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
80 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
90 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
100 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 77.77
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 45.92

Table 6.110 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 2 – Safety 3 combination.

70
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.111 Economics 2 – Sustainability Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 2 Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 2 Base Case Score is 77.77
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 93.14

Table 6.111 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 2 – Sustainability combination.
Table 6.112 Economics 2 – Safety 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 2 Score
Environmental
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Impact Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 1 Base Case Score is 77.77
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.112 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any

point in Economics 2 – Environmental Impact combination.

71
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.113 Economics 3 – Manufacturability Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 3 Score
Manufacturability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00

Table 6.113 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 3 – Manufacturability combination.

Table 6.114 Economics 3 – Safety 1 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 3 Score
Safety 1
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11

Table 6.114 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 3 – Safety 1 combination.

72
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.115 Economics 3 – Safety 2 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 3 Score
Safety 2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29

Table 6.115 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 3 – Safety 2 combination.

Table 6.116 Economics 3 – Safety 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 3 Score
Safety 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00
*Safety 3 Base Case Score is 45.92

Table 6.116 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 3 – Safety 3 combination.

73
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.117 Economics 3 – Sustainability Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 3 Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00
*Sustainability Base Case Score is 93.14

Table 6.117 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 3 – Sustainability combination.

Table 6.118 Economics 3 – Environmental Impact Sensitivity Analysis

Economics 3 Score
Environmental
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Impact Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Economics 3 Base Case Score is 100.00
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.118 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Economics 3 – Environmental Impact combination.

74
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.119 Manufacturability – Safety 1 Sensitivity Analysis

Manufacturability Score
Safety 1
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11

Table 6.119 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Manufacturability – Safety 1 combination.

Table 6.120 Manufacturability – Safety 2 Sensitivity Analysis

Manufacturability Score
Safety 2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29

Table 6.120 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Manufacturability – Safety 2 combination.

75
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.121 Manufacturability – Safety 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Manufacturability Score
Safety 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00
*Safety 3 Base Case Score is 45.92

Table 6.121 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Manufacturability – Safety 3 combination.

Table 6.122 Manufacturability – Sustainability Sensitivity Analysis

Manufacturability Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00
*Sustainability Base Case Score is 93.14

Table 6.122 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Manufacturability – Sustainability combination.

76
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.123 Manufacturability – Environmental Impact Sensitivity Analysis

Manufacturability Score
Environmental
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Impact Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Manufacturability Base Case Score is 10.00
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.123 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Manufacturability – Environmental Impact combination.

Table 6.124 Safety 1 – Safety 2 Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 1 Score
Safety 2
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29

Table 6.124 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 1 – Safety 2 combination.

77
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.125 Safety 1 – Safety 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 1 Score
Safety 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11
*Safety 3 Base Case Score is 45.92

Table 6.125 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 1 – Safety 3 combination.

Table 6.126 Safety 1 – Sustainability Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 1 Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11
*Sustainability Base Case Score is 93.14

Table 6.126 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 1 – Sustainability combination.

78
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.125 Safety 1 – Environmental Impact Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 1 Score
Environmental
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Impact Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 1 Base Case Score is 21.11
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.125 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 1 – Environmental Impact combination.

Table 6.126 Safety 2 – Safety 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 2 Score
Safety 3
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29
*Safety 3 Base Case Score is 45.92

Table 6.126 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 2 – Safety 3 combination.

79
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.127 Safety 2 – Sustainability Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 2 Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29
*Sustainability Base Case Score is 93.14

Table 6.127 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 2 – Sustainability combination.

Table 6.128 Safety 2 – Environmental Impact Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 2 Score
Environmental
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Impact Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 2 Base Case Score is 36.29
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.128 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 2 – Environmental Impact combination.

80
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.129 Safety 3 – Sustainability Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 3 Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 3 Base Case Score is 36.29
*Sustainability Base Case Score is 93.14

Table 6.129 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 3 – Sustainability combination.
Table 6.130 Safety 3 – Environmental Impact Sensitivity Analysis

Safety 3 Score
Sustainability
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Safety 3 Base Case Score is 36.29
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.130 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Safety 3 – Environmental Impact combination.

81
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

Table 6.131 Sustainability – Environmental Impact Sensitivity Analysis

Sustainability Score
Environmental
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Impact Score
10 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
20 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
30 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
40 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
50 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
60 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
70 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
80 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
90 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
100 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11 P11
*Sustainability Base Case Score is 93.14
*Environmental Impact Base Case Score is 62.96

Table 6.131 shows that Process 1 is an appropriate choice at any point

in Sustainability – Environmental Impact combination.

82
 Technological Institute of the Philippines

SUMMARY OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON VARIED ATTRIBUTE

SCORES

Sensitivity Analysis is a method used to identify and justify which

process best fits to produce Magnesium Sulfate. Three process have undergone
the analysis, namely, Stirring-Crystallization Technique, Calcination Process,
and Neutralization of Sulfuric Acid Process with nine (9) attributes which were
evaluated in the analysis. By changing the base score values of each attribute, we
were able to project the response of the three processes. Single-Factor and Two-
Factor analysis method were done which is presented above.

Based on Single-Factor Sensitivity Analysis, it is observed that in almost

each criterion, Process 11 is the best choice. Base score values were deviated from
10% up to 1000%. Manufacturability and Safety 3 chose different process when
their scores were changed. At 405% for Manufacturability chose P31 while at
610% for Safety 3, P21 was deemed the best. These scenarios were neglected
since threshold scores deviated greatly on their original scores and other
attributes were compromised which puts the process at risk.

Using the Two-Factor Sensitivity Analysis, it can be sought that at all

combinations of attributes and changing their scores from 0% to 100%, the
chosen process is still Process 11.

83