Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Composite Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
a
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad 826004, India
b
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
Keywords: The analysis of the non-linear vibration response is carried out for functionally graded (FG) circular cylindrical
Functionally graded material shells subjected to thermal environment along with mechanical in-plane non-uniformly distributed loading along
Non-linear vibration the edges and harmonic radial force. The temperature dependent material properties of the simply supported
Frequency-amplitude response shell are assumed to vary in the radial direction according to power-law distribution. Based on the first-order
Incremental harmonic balance method
shear deformation theory and von-Kármán type geometric nonlinearity, the strain-displacement relationships
Circular cylindrical shells
are established for circular cylindrical shells. The coupled governing equations of motion for functionally graded
cylindrical shells are then derived using Hamilton’s principle. Employing Galerkin’s method, the coupled partial
differential equations of motions are reduced to a set of non-linear ordinary differential equations. In order to
obtain the free and forced vibration response of the FG shell, the incremental harmonic balance method, in
conjunction with the arc-length method, is used. The non-uniform in-plane loading is converted to Fourier series
and the pre-buckling analysis is performed to determine the stress distribution within the shell. The non-linear
frequency-amplitude response is studied to examine the effects of volume fractions of the constituents, static
partial edge loadings, thermal loads, and radial periodic loadings.
1. Introduction static part of the applied harmonic load is less than that of the critical
load [3–5]. Hence vibration analysis of functionally graded cylindrical
The first approach towards a holistic study for thermal load resisting shell in a thermal environment is a matter of considerable importance
material began in 1984 with the introduction of functionally graded in order to assess the structural failure.
material (FGM). FGM belongs to a class of advanced inhomogeneous Non-linear vibration and dynamic instability analysis of cylindrical
composite material characterized by a smooth and continuous variation shells have been investigated extensively in the past few years. Few
of material properties in the thickness direction. Such spatial variation authors reported the hardening type of non-linear behavior for the
of the constituents eliminates the stress concentration and delamina- cylindrical shell [6–11] as they did not consider the axisymmetric terms
tion, which are the major limitations of laminated composites. Usually, in the assumed displacement functions. However, the experimental
FGMs are made from a mixture of ceramic and metal. The ceramic investigation indicated the softening type of non-linear behavior for
constituent of the material provides the high-temperature resistance cylindrical shell [12,13]. Amabili et al. [14] improved mode shape
due to its low thermal conductivity. On the other hand, the ductile function by incorporating the axisymmetric terms in addition to the
metal constituent prevents fracture caused by stresses. driven and companion modes for accurately predicting the behavior of
Functionally graded cylindrical shells find widespread application a circular cylindrical shell. Later, Amabili [15] presented a comparative
in space vehicles, nuclear plants, and chemical vessels due to its ability study of five different non-linear shell theories known as Donnell’s
to withstand high-temperature environment without losing structural shallow-shell, Donnell’s with in-plane inertia, Sanders-Koiter, Flügge-
integrity [1,2]. These structural components are often subjected to Lur’e-Byrne, and Novozhilov’s theories. Based on numerical results it
harmonic loadings. The instability of FG cylindrical shell under certain was reported that the response obtained from Sanders-Koiter, Flügge-
specific relationships between loading amplitude, forcing frequency of Lur’e-Byrne and Novozhilov’s theories are extremely close. However, a
the load and frequency of the structural elements may occur even if the small difference was noticed between above mentioned three theories
Corresponding author.
⁎
E-mail addresses: amit.17dr000399@cve.ism.ac.in (A. Yadav), marco.amabili@mcgill.ca (M. Amabili), sarat@iitism.ac.in (S.K. Panda),
tanish@iitism.ac.in (T. Dey).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111430
Received 5 May 2019; Received in revised form 29 June 2019; Accepted 11 September 2019
Available online 14 September 2019
0263-8223/ © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
and Donnell’s shell theory with in-plane inertia. investigation, the asymmetric (driven and companion mode) and ax-
Wu et al. [16] determined the thermal buckling capacity of func- isymmetric modes of vibrations are taken into account to study the
tionally graded cylindrical shell subjected to thermal loadings. The nonlinear response of FG cylindrical shell. The mechanical properties of
authors used three different types of thermal loadings and suggested to functionally graded materials are tailored by using the power-law dis-
check the buckling temperature for the functionally graded cylindrical tribution. The nonlinear strain-displacement and constitutive relation-
shell as it generally has low buckling temperature than the corre- ships are established using first-order shear deformation shell theory
sponding homogeneous cylindrical shell, although FGM has other ad- along with von-Kármán type kinematic nonlinearities, and then the
vantages as a heat resistant material. Kadoli and Ganesan [17] de- non-linear coupled partial differential equations are derived using
termined the thermal buckling load of the functionally graded Hamilton's principle. Following multi-term Galerkin’s method, these
cylindrical shell having clamped–clamped end conditions. The authors partial differential equations are reduced to a set of ordinary differ-
presented finite element method based on the first order shear de- ential equations. To obtain the frequency-amplitude response of the FG
formation theory to analyze the system. Huang and Han [18] in- cylindrical shell, the incremental harmonic balance method accom-
vestigated the nonlinear buckling and post-buckling of functionally panied by arc-length method is used. As the static loading is applied
graded cylindrical shell under the combined action of longitudinal and partially along the circumference of the shell, Ritz method is used to
lateral loading. The nonlinear strain–displacement relationship in obtain the pre-buckling stresses within the cylindrical shell. The time
conjunction with Ritz energy method had been used to derive the history responses are also computed by using Newmark’s method.
governing partial differential equations. Zhao et al. [19] used a mesh-
less method to examine the static response and free vibration char-
2. Functionally graded circular cylindrical shell
acteristics of the functionally graded cylindrical shell. Zhang et al. [20]
performed a nonlinear dynamical analysis of clamped–clamped func-
FGMs are frequently used as thermal shields and thus exposed to
tionally graded cylindrical shell in the thermal environment. von-
extreme temperatures. Since the material properties are a function of
Kármán nonlinear strain–displacement relationship followed by Ha-
temperature T(K), a typical material property P (e.g. Young’s modulus
milton’s principle has been used to derive the non-linear governing
of elasticity E, mass density ρ or thermal expansion coefficient α) of the
differential equations. Thereafter, these equations had been reduced to
constituent material may be expressed as [27].
ordinary differential equations by using Galerkin’s method. Rafiee et al.
[21] analyzed the nonlinear vibration and dynamic behavior of piezo- P = P0 (P 1 T 1 + 1 + P1 T + P2 T 2 + P3 T 3). (1)
electric functionally graded shells under axial and lateral loading in
conjunction with thermal, electrical and aerodynamic loads. Beni et al. where, P0, P-1, P1, P2 and P3 are the temperature dependent coefficients
[22] developed a formulation based on first-order shear deformation and specific for each material. The functionally graded cylindrical shell
and the modified couple stress theory to analyze functionally graded is assumed to be graded along the thickness direction.
cylindrical nanoshell. Sofiyev [23] investigated the nonlinear free vi- The material properties of FGMs (PFGM) have been tailored by
bration of the functionally graded orthotropic shell. The mathematical changing the volume fraction (Vf) of ceramic at the inner surface of the
model of the problem had been constructed in the framework of shear cylinder to metal at the outer surface.
deformation theory. Song et al. [24] carried out an analysis to de- PFGM = Pm V fm + Pc V fc, (2)
termine the vibration characteristics of the Carbon Nanotube (CNT) –
reinforced functionally graded cylindrical shell using Reddy’s higher where, subscript m and c denotes metal and ceramic constituents of the
order shear deformation theory. Wang et al. [25] proposed a formula- FG cylindrical shell, respectively. The volume fraction may be ex-
tion to analyze the functionally graded CNT-reinforced composite pressed using the power-law function as,
shallow shell having the ability to deal with general end conditions.
z
Asadi [26] carried out an instability analysis of functionally graded V fm = + 0.5 and V fm + V fc = 1
h (3)
CNT reinforced composite cylindrical shell exposed to supersonic air-
flow. Using the relation expressed in Eq. (2) and Eq. (3), the material
After an extensive review on nonlinear vibration analysis of cy- properties of FGM can be expressed as,
lindrical shell, it is observed that the non-linear analysis of functionally
graded cylindrical shell is scarcely available. Moreover, to the best of z
PFGM = Pc + (Pm Pc ) + 0.5 ,
the authors’ knowledge, the works on the nonlinear dynamic response h (4)
of functionally graded circular cylindrical shell under the combined
where, Φ is the power-law exponent and a positive real number. The
action of static axial partial loading, harmonic radial point loading, and
radial direction z and thickness h of FG cylindrical shell are shown in
thermal loading are not available in the open literature. In this
Fig. 1.
2
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
Q11 Q12 0 0 0
Q21 Q22 0 0 0
Q= 0 0 Q66 0 0 .
0 0 0 Q44 0
0 0 0 0 Q55 (9)
For FGM, the elements of stiffness matrix Qij can be defined as,
EFGM FGM EFGM FGM EFGM
Q11 = 1 2 , Q12 = 1 2 , Q21 = 1 2 ,
FGM FGM FGM
EFGM EFGM
Q22 = , Q66 = Q44 = Q55 = .
1 2
FGM 2(1 + FGM ) (10)
The resultant force and moment vectors can be determined as,
Nxx Mxx
N M
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the functionally graded, circular cylindrical shell Nx Mx
under static axial partial loading and adopted coordinate system.
h xx h xx (z )
2 2 Pxx
= h (1, z ) dz h Qij T (z ) (1, z ) dz and P
3. Governing equations 2 x 2
0
h
A functionally graded cylindrical shell is considered with mean ra- 2 xz
= h dz.
z (11)
dius R, length L, and uniform thickness h (see Fig. 1). The displacements 2
of a generic point of the shell in axial, circumferential and transverse The resultant force and moments can be expressed using A, B and D
directions are indicated as u, v and w in the direction x , θ, and z, re- matrix as follows,
spectively. In this investigation, the governing equations of FG circular
cylindrical shells, describing the vibration characteristics under lateral
loading, are obtained by using a first-order shear deformation shell
{MN } = ( AB DB ) { k } NT
MT
and P = K c Hf
(12a)
theory that retains only nonlinear terms in the transverse displacement where, A, B and D are the elastic matrix, coupling matrix, and flexural
w. This is an approximation that is valid for the moderate amplitude of stiffness matrix, respectively. Kc is the shear correction factor for first
w/h. More accurate formulations are introduced in [28–31]. The order shear deformation theory and the value is 5/6.
normal and shear strains at distance z from the middle surface are ex- The elements of A, B and D matrices can be defined as,
pressed as,
h
2
0
(Aij , Bij , Dij ) = h Qij (1, z, z 2) dz (i = 1, 2, 6) and (Hij)
xx xx k xx 2
0 h
= +z k , 2
= h Qij dz (i = 4, 5)
x 0 kx (12b)
x (5) 2
1 2 d dT
u,0x + 2 w ,0x (z ) = 0, T = Tc at z = h/2 and T = Tm at z = h/2.
0
xx 2 k xx dz dz (13a)
0 v,0 w0 w ,0
{ i0} = = + + {ki} = k where
R R 2R2
kx
( )
0 z 1
x u,0 w,0x w ,0 (z ) = cm h + 2 + c and cm = m c.
+ v ,0x +
R R The following expression for the temperature distribution in the
x ,x thickness direction can be obtained [32].
=
,
(i = 1, 2, 6), T (z ) = Tc + (Tm Tc ) (z ), (13b)
R
x,
R
+ ,x (6) 1 2z + h cm 2z + h +1
(z ) =
2h ( + 1) m 2h
2 2 +1 3
2z + h
0
x + w ,0x + cm
2
+ cm
3
{ i} =
xz
= (i = 4, 5), (2 + 1) m 2h (3 + 1) m
0 w,0
z + R (7) 2z + h 3 +1 4
2z + h 4 +1 5
cm cm
+ 3
+ 5
2h (4 + 1) m 2h (5 + 1) m
where, x and are the rotations of the cross-sections about θ and x- 2z + h 5 +1
axis, respectively, and subscript (,) denotes the partial differentiation. ,
2h (13c)
The constitutive relations for FG cylindrical shell subjected to a
uniform temperature T can be written as, cm
2
cm
3
cm
4
cm
5
cm
=1 + 2 3
+ 4 5
.
( + 1) cm (2 + 1) cm (3 + 1) cm (4 + 1) cm (5 + 1) cm
=Q t. (8)
(13d)
Here, Q is the stiffness matrix, = { xx , , x , xz , z and }T The non-linear equations of motion for a FG cylindrical shell have
t= { txx , t , tx , txz , t z }T are the stress and temperature stress vec- been derived based on first – order shear deformation theory and via
tors. Hamilton’s principle. The governing partial differential equations of FG
3
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
cylindrical shells in terms of force and moment resultants can be 4. Solution procedure
written as,
4.1. Boundary conditions
Nx ,
Nxx , x + = I1 u¨ + I2 ¨x ,
R (14) The boundary conditions of FG circular cylindrical shell having both
ends simply supported are as follows,
N , atx = 0, LNxx = Nxx , w = Mxx = v = = 0. (19)
+ Nx = I1 v¨ + I2 ¨ ,
R
,x
(15)
The displacement functions consisting of asymmetric modes (driven
mode and companion mode) and axisymmetric modes satisfying the
2Mx , x M , N Nx w , geometric boundary conditions are assumed as given below [30]
Mxx , xx + + + Nxx w, x +
R R2 R R
,x
u (x , , t )
Nx w, x N w, M1 N
+ + = I1 w¨ + f (x , , t ), = [um, j, c (t ) cos (j ) + um, j, s (t ) sin(j )] cos(
R R2 m x) +
, (16) m =1 j=1
M2
1 um,0 (t ) cos( m x ),
Mxx , x + Mx Pxx = I2 u¨ + I3 ¨x , (20)
R
,
(17) m=1
3M1 2N
1 v (x , , t ) = [vm, j, c (t ) sin(j ) + vm, j, s (t ) cos(j )] sin( m x ),
Mx + M P = I2 v¨ + I3 ¨ , (21)
,x
R
,
(18) m=1 j =1
where, w (x , , t )
Nxx = (Nxx n xx ); N = (N n ) and Nx = (Nx nx ). M1 N
The internal stress resultants caused by imposed in-plane loading = [wm, j, c (t ) cos(j ) + wm, j, s (t ) sin(j )] sin( m x) +
m =1 j=1
are represented by nxx, nθθ and nxθ. While, Nxx, Nθθ, and Nxθ are the M2
secondary stress resultant induced due to large deformation into FG wm,0 (t ) sin( m x ),
cylindrical shell. In addition to dynamic radial point loading, the static m=1 (22)
axial partial loadings are also applied to the FG cylindrical shell in this
investigation. In order to carry out the analysis, the circumference of x (x , , t)
the shell is divided into four strips and each strip is represented by two M1 N
angles indicating the starting and end point (see Fig. 2). Three different = [ xm, j, c (t ) cos(j ) + xm, j, s (t ) sin(j )] cos( m x) +
spatial distributions of applied loading along the circumference of the
m =1 j=1
M2
shell are considered and shown in Fig. 2. The partial loading is ex-
(t ) cos( m x ),
pressed as an infinite series of harmonic functions using Fourier series. m=1
xm,0
(23)
The pre-buckling analysis is conducted as the applied load is partially
applied along the circumference. The mathematical expressions for M1 N
(x , , t ) = [ (t ) sin(j ) + (t ) cos(j )] sin( m x ),
partial loading and pre-buckling analysis have been presented in Ap- m, j, c m, j, s
m =1 j=1
pendix A.
The notations Nij , Mij are adopted here to represent internal stress (24)
and moment resultants, respectively, and Pij is the additional moment where, m = m /l , m and j are the numbers of longitudinal half-waves
caused by the curvature effect. and circumferential waves, respectively. um, j (t ) , vm, j (t ) , wm, j (t ) , xm,j (t )
Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of partial edge loading on the circumference of the functionally graded circular cylindrical shell.
4
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
and m, j (t ) are the generalized coordinates that are function of time. ¨ + [KL + KNL2 + KNL3 ] X = F cos t ,
MX (31)
The additional subscript c or s indicates if the generalized coordinate is
where, M, KL, KNL2, KNL3 are the mass, linear elastic stiffness, quadratic
associated with cosine or sine function except for v, for which the no-
non-linear stiffness matrix and cubic non-linear stiffness matrix, re-
tations are reversed. To get better accuracy with minimum degrees of
spectively. Increment Harmonic Balance (IHB) method in conjunction
freedom, the integers N, M1 and M2 are selected based on the con-
with arc-length method is adopted to investigate the non-linear free and
vergence study and are presented as given below.
forced vibration responses of FG cylindrical shell.
u (x , , t )
4.3. Incremental harmonic balance (IHB) formulation
= [u1, k, c (t ) cos(k ) + u1, k, s (t ) sin(k )] cos( 1 x ) +
k = 2,4, n
3 The non-dimensional time scale in Eq. (31) is introduced and the
u2m 1,0 (t ) cos( 2m 1 x ), non-linear ordinary differential equations can be rewritten in the fol-
m=1 (25) lowing form,
2 MX + [KL + KNL2 + KNL3 ] X = F cos , (32)
v (x , , t )
= [v1, k, c (t ) sin(k ) + v1, k, s (t ) cos(k )] sin( 1 x ) + [v3,2n, c where, the dimensionless time scale = t and the prime ( ) represents
k = 2,4, n,2n the differentiation with respect to . Let Xj0 and 0 denote a state of
vibration of Eq. (32), the neighboring state can be written by adding the
(t ) sin(2n ) + v3,2n, s cos(2n )] sin( 3 x ), (26)
corresponding increments as,
w (x , , t ) Xj = Xj0 + X and = 0 + (33)
= [w1, k, c (t ) cos(k ) + w1, k, s (t ) sin(k )] sin( 1 x ) + Substituting the Eq. (33) into Eq. (32) and eliminating the higher
k = 2,4, n
3
order incremental terms, the Eq. (32) is reduced to the linearized in-
w 2m cremental form as
1,0 (t ) sin( 2m 1 x ),
m=1 (27) 2
0M X +[KL + 2KNL2 + 3KNL3] X = Re [2 0 MX 0 ] , (34)
The FG cylindrical shell is also subjected to periodic radial point Kmc A = R R mc . (38)
loading. The mathematical expression of this mechanical loading can be where, Kmc =
2
ST [ 2
0 0 MS +(KL + 2KNL2 + 3KNL3) S] d ,
expressed as,
2
2
~ ~ R= ST [Fcos 0 MS (KL + KNL2 + KNL3) S] d A ,
F = F (R R ) (x x~) cos( t ). (30) 0
~ 2
Here, represents Dirac delta function, F is the magnitude of ap- Rmc = ST [2 0 MS ] d A.
~
plied periodic point loading. The notations and x~ are the point of 0
application of loadings in the circumferential direction and longitudinal The frequency-amplitude response of functionally graded circular
direction, respectively. The periodic mechanical loading is applied to cylindrical shell is determined by solving the Eq. (38) using the arc-
~
FG cylindrical shell at = 0 and x~ = L /2 . Adopting the Galerkin length method.
method, the governing partial differential equations (PDEs) of the
functionally graded cylindrical shell which is subjected harmonic radial 5. Results and discussions
point loading along with static axial partial loading and thermal en-
vironment are converted into coupled ordinary differential equations Non-linear vibration analysis of functionally graded circular cy-
(ODEs) with quadratic and cubic non-linearities. lindrical shell which is subjected to mechanical loading and thermal
5
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
5.1. Validation
Table 1
The properties of two constituent materials [33].
P0 P-1 P1 P2 P3
Stainless steel (Metal) E (N/m2) 201.04 × 109 0 3.079 × 10−4 −6.534 × 10−7 0
α (/K ) 12.330 × 10−6 0 8.086 × 10−4 0 0
ν 0.3262 0 −2.002 × 10−4 3.797 × 10−7 0
(W/mK) 15.379 0 −1.264 × 10−3 2.092 × 10−6 −7.223 × 10− 10
ρ (kg/m3) 8166 0 0 0 0
Silicon nitride (Ceramic) E (N/m2) 348.43 × 109 0 −3.070 × 10−4 2.160 × 10−7 −8.946 × 10−11
α (/K ) 5.8723 × 10−6 0 9.095 × 10−4 0 0
ν 0.2400 0 0 0 0
(W/mK) 13.723 0 −1.032 × 10−3 5.466 × 10−7 −7.876 × 10−11
ρ (kg/m3) 2370 0 0 0 0
6
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
Fig. 7. Influence of different magnitude periodic radial loading (F) on the non-
Fig. 5. Effect of height-to- radius (h/R) ratio on the free vibration response
linear behavior of FG circular cylindrical shells (L/R = 2, h/R = 0.1, Φ = 1,
(backbone curve) of functionally graded cylindrical shell (L/R = 2, Φ = 1,
Tc = 400 K and Tm = 300 K).
Tc = 400 K and Tm = 300 K).
Fig. 6. Effect of temperature difference across the thickness (ΔT) on forced Fig. 9. Influence of different load cases on the non-linear behavior of func-
vibration response of FG circular cylindrical shell (L/R = 2, h/R = 0.1, Φ = 1, tionally graded cylindrical shells (L/R = 2, h/R = 0.01, Φ = 1, F = 30 N).
F = 3000 N).
7
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
that the complementary response curve are close to each other when
the power law exponent is maximum.
Fig. 9 represents the effect of three different static axial loadings on
the frequency-response curves. Three load cases are considered by
changing the spatial distribution of applied static axial loadings on the
circumference of the FG circular cylindrical shell as shown in Fig. 2. It is
noticed that the response curve corresponding to Load case I (complete
loading) shows more softening behavior than that of the other two
cases. Moreover, no significant difference is found in the behavior of
Load case II and III. Hence, the total amplitude of the load is a matter of
concern in the analysis of FG cylindrical shell, not the manner in which
the load is applied.
The frequency-amplitude responses of FG cylindrical shell (L/R = 2,
h/R = 0.01) subjected to three different axial compressive pre-loadings
(Nx = 0, 0.3Nxcr, and 0.5Nxcr) along with periodic radial loading (10 N)
are shown in Fig. 10. It is observed that as the magnitude of axial
compressive loading increases, the non-linear behavior of FG shell be-
comes more and more softening type. This is due to the fact that the
Fig. 10. Effect of axial compressive pre-loadings on the non-linear behavior of shell becomes less stiff when it is subjected to higher compressive load.
functionally graded cylindrical shells (L/R = 2, h/R = 0.01, Φ = 1, F = 10 N). In order to investigate the participation of driven mode (w1, n, c ),
companion mode (w1, n, s ) and axisymmetric modes (w1,0 , w3,0 and w5,0 ),
the forced vibration responses of FG cylindrical shell (L/R = 2, h/
direction with the help of power-law exponent (Φ). Since, the power-
R = 0.1) subjected to periodic radial point loading (3000 N) are plotted
law exponent (Φ) governs the mechanical properties of the FG cylind-
in Fig. 11(a–d). It is noticed from Fig. 11(a–d) that the amplitude of first
rical shell, the influence of this mechanical property on the responses of
asymmetric mode (w1, n, c ) is much higher than that of first axisymmetric
FG cylindrical shells are noticed in Fig. 8. The shell with a lower value
mode (w1,0 ). It is also observed that the first axisymmetric mode (w1,0 )
of power-law exponent (Φ) shows more softening behavior as the metal
undergoes a negative amplitude of vibration i.e., radially inward di-
part covers more volume and make the shell less stiff. It is also observed
rection.
Fig. 11. Forced vibration response of different modes of FG circular cylindrical shell (L/R = 2, h/R = 0.1, Φ = 1) subjected to periodic point loading (F = 3000 N).
8
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
Fig. 12. Time history response of different modes of FG circular cylindrical shell (L/R = 2, h/R = 0.1, Φ = 1) subjected to periodic point loading (F = 3000 N).
The corresponding time responses of the same FG cylindrical shell The free vibration response of thin FG cylindrical shell with h/
are given in Fig. 12(a) to (d) for the excitation frequency / 1, n = 0.99 . R = 0.1 shows softening type of nonlinear behaviour, whereas, the shell
From Fig. 12(a) and (b), it is noticed that these two modes of vibration with h/R = 0.1 shows hardening behaviour. For the shell with h/
are having the same frequency. However, there is a phase difference of R = 0.3, it initially shows mild softening which changes to hardening
π/2 between these two modes of vibration resulting in a traveling wave type for a higher value of transverse displacements. With regards to the
response. From frequencies of asymmetric and axisymmetric modes, it different thermal environment, it is observed that the shell subjected to
is evident that the frequencies of axisymmetric modes are much higher higher temperature along the thickness of the shell exhibits more
than that of asymmetric mode. For two particular cylindrical FG shell, it softening type non-linear behaviour because of losing its structural
is observed that the frequency of asymmetric mode is approximately 1.5 stiffness. For the different magnitude of applied periodic radial point
times the frequency of axisymmetric mode. loading, the softening behavior of FG cylindrical shell does not change.
However, two complementary response curves get closer to each other
6. Conclusions as the magnitude of applied periodic load decreases. It is also observed
that the increment in the volume fraction of ceramic causes less soft-
The nonlinear free and forced vibration analysis is carried out for FG ening behaviour of FG cylindrical shell. Moreover, two complementary
cylindrical shell which is subjected to a thermal environment along response curves get closer to each other when the value of power-law
with mechanical edge loading and periodic mechanical transverse exponent increases. The frequency amplitude-response does not change
loading. The mechanical properties of functionally graded materials are as the distribution of the load along the circumference of the shell is
varied by changing the volume fraction of metal and ceramic by using modified The results reveal that the softening type of non-linear be-
the power-law distribution. The nonlinear partial differential equations havior increases as the axial compressive loading is increased due to the
are derived using Donnell type shell theory along with first-order shear fact that the shell becomes less stiff when it is subjected to higher
deformation. The approximate displacement fields consisting of driven, compressive forces. It is also concluded that frequency of the axisym-
companion and axisymmetric modes are assumed and Galerkin’s metric modes of the vibration is much higher than the frequency of
method is employed to obtain a set of ordinary differential equations. asymmetric modes.
Following the incremental harmonic balance method along with arc-
length method, the free and forced vibration responses of functionally Acknowledgements
graded cylindrical shell are determined. Since the static load is partial
and applied using four strips along the circumference, the pre-buckling The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support for
analysis using Ritz method is performed and the exact stress distribu- present work under Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB),
tion within the shell is determined. India having sanction no: SR/S3/MERC/0098/2012.
9
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
Appendix A
The expression for the membrane strain energy of functionally graded cylindrical shell with thickness h is expressed as given below.
1
n xx A11 A12 A16 n xx
h
V= n A21 A22 A26 n dxd ,
2 A
nx nx
A61 A62 A66 (A1)
1 2 2 1 2 h /2
n xx = , n = , nx = , Aij = Qij dz
R2 2 x2 R x h /2 (A2)
Adopting Ritz method, the membrane strain energy is minimized to determine the exact stress distribution within the FG circular cylindrical
shell. The end conditions of the cylindrical shell subjected to partial edge loading are considered as,
~
x = 0, L N¯x = 0; N¯xx = Nxx . (A3)
Using Fourier series expansion, the final expression of applied partial edge load as a function of 1, 2. .. 8 is derived and given below.
sin k ( ) cos k (
2
2
1 2+ 1
2 )
+sin k ( ) cos k (
4
2
3 4+ 3
2 )
2
+ cos(k )
+ sin k ( ) cos k ( )
k=1 k
6 5 6+ 5
2 2
+ sin k ( ) cos k (
8 7 8+ 7
)
~ N¯ ( 2 + 4 + 6 + 8 1 3 5 7)
2 2
Nxx = + N¯ .
2
sin k ( ) sin k (
2
2
1 2+ 1
2 )
+sin k ( ) sin k (
4
2
3 4+ 3
2 )
2
+ sin(k )
+ sin k ( ) sin k ( )
k=1 k
6 5 6+ 5
2 2
+ sin k ( ) sin k (
8 7 8+ 7
)
2 2
(A4)
The stress function is assumed in the following form of a series,
= 0 + 1 1 + 2 2 + 3 3 + 4 4 + ... (A5)
The constants ( i ) in Eq. (A3) are determined by imposing the boundary conditions and minimizing the membrane strain energy of FG circular
cylindrical shell. The first four terms in the expansion of are considered in this paper. Hence, the stress function ( ) for partial edge loading can be
expressed as,
sin k ( ) cos k ( 2
2
1 2+ 1
2 )
+ sin k ( ) cos k ( 4
2
3 4+ 3
2 )
2
+ k = 1 k3
cos(k )
+ sin k ( ) cos k ( 6
2
5 6+ 5
2 )
+ sin k ( ) cos k ( 8 7 8+ 7
)
N¯ ( 2 + 4 + 6 + 8 1 3 5 7)
2 2 2
= N¯ + (x 2 + Lx )2 ( 1 + 2x + 3 ).
4
sin k ( ) sin k ( 2
2
1 2+ 1
2 )
+ sin k ( ) sin k ( 4
2
3 4+ 3
2 )
2
+ k = 1 k3
sin(k )
+ sin k ( ) sin k ( 6
2
5 6+ 5
2 )
+ sin k ( ) sin k ( 8 7 8+ 7
)
2 2
(A6)
The unknowns ( 0, 1, 2, and 3) in Eq. (A4) are determined by applying the boundary conditions and satisfying the compatibility conditions.
Appendix B
1 A62 ( w,
R2
w,
+
v,
R
+
w,
R )+A ( 66
u,
R
+
w,
R
w, x
+
w, w, x
R
+ v,x )+A 61 (u, x + w, x w, x )
+ A12
w , w, x
+
v,x
+
w,x
+ A16
R B62 w , 2B66 w , x
B61 w , xx R2 R R
R2 R
10
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
1 A22
,
R2(, w w
+ ,R + R, + A26 ,R +
v w
) ( u w,
R
w, x
+
w, w, x
R
+ v,x ) + A62
w , w, x
+
v,x
+
w,x
+ A66
u, x
+
w, x w, x
+
w, w , xx
+ v , xx + A61
R + A21 (u, x + w , x w , x )
B22 w , 2B 26 w, x
B21 w, xx R2 R R R R R
2 R R
B62 w , x 2B66 w, xx
(u, xx + w, x w, xx ) B61 w, xxx = I1 v¨ + I2 ¨ ,
R2 R (B2)
w ,2
A12 w, x ( w,x
R
+
v, x
R
+
w , w, x
R2 )+A 12 2R2
+
w
R
+
v,
R
w, xx
+ A16 ( u,
R
+ v, x +
w , w, x
R )w , xx + A11 ( 1 2
w
2 ,x
+ u, x w, xx )
w,2
A22 +
w
+
v, B22 w ,
+ A26 ( u,
+ v,x +
w, w, x
)
+ w , xx ( B12 w ,
R2
2B16 w, x
R
B11 w, xx + ) 1
w
R2 ,
2R2 R R R2 R R
+ A21 ( 1 2
w
2 ,x
+ u, x ) 2B26 w , x
R
B21 w , xx
w,2
1
R
A22
2R2
+
w
R
+
v,
R
B22 w ,
R2
+ A26 ( u,
R
+ v,x +
w, w, x
R )+A ( 21
1 2
w
2 ,x
+ u, x ) 2B26 w x
R
B21 w , xx
( )+A ( )
2 w2 w v, B62 w , u, w, w, x 1 2 2B66 w, x
+ R w, x A62 + + + A66 + v,x + 61 w
2 ,x
+ u, x B61 w , xx
2R 2 R R R2 R R R
+ A16 w , x ( u, x
R
+
w, x w,x
R
+ v , xx +
w , w , xx
R )+A 11 w , x (u, xx + w, x w, xx )
+
1
w
A22 ( w,
R2
w,
+
w,
R
+
v,
R ) B 22 w,
R2
+ A26 ( u,
R
+
w,
R
w,x
+ v,x +
w, w , x
R )+A 21 (u, x + w,x + w,x )
R2 , 2B26 w , x
R
B21 w, xx
+
1
w
A62 ( w,
R2
w,
+
w,
R
+
v,
R ) B62 w ,
R2
+ A66 ( u,
R
+
w,
R
w, x
+ v,x +
w, w, x
R )+A 61 (u, x + w,x w,x )
R ,x 2B66 w, x
R
B61 w, xx
w,2 w, v, w, w, D22 w ,
B22 R2
+ R
+ R
+ R2 R2
w ,2x w , xx v, xx w , w , xx D12 w, xx 1
+ B12 R2
+ R
+ R
+ R2 R2
+ R2 + B26 ( u,
R
+
w,
R
w, x
+
2w ,
R
w, x
+ v,x +
w , w, x
R )
2D26 w, x
+ B21 (w ,2x + u, x + w,x w,x ) R
D21 w , xx
A62 ( w, x
R
+
v, x
R
+
w, w, x
R2 ) B62 w, x
R2
+ w,x ( B12 w, x
R2
2B16 w, xx
R
B11 w , xxx + ) 1
w
R , + A66 ( u, x
R
+
w, x
R
+ v , xx +
w , w , xx
R )
2B66 w , xx
+ A61 (u, xx + w, x w, xx ) R
B61 w, xxx
2D66 w , xx
+ B61 (w, x w, xx + u, xx + w , x w , xx ) R
D61 w, xxx (B3)
1 B62 ( w, w,
R2
+
v,
R
+
w,
R )+B ( 66
u,
R
+
w,
R
w, x
+
w, w , x
R
+ v,x )+B 61 (u, x + w,x w,x )
+ B16
u, x
+
w,x w,x
+
w, w, xx
+ v , xx + B11
R D62 w , 2D66 w , x
D61 w , xx R R R
R2 R
w, D12 w, x 2D16 w , xx
(u, xx + w, x w, xx ) K c H54 + + H44 (w , x + x) D11 w, xxx = I2 u¨ + I3 ¨x ,
R R2 R (B4)
1 B22 ( w, w,
R2
+
v,
R
+
w,
R )+B ( 26
u,
R
+
w,
R
w, x
+
w, w , x
R
+ v,x )+B 21 (u, x + w,x w,x )
+ B62
w, w ,x
+
v, x
+
w, x
+ B66
R D22 w , 2D26 w , x
D21 w , xx R2 R R
R2 R
11
A. Yadav, et al. Composite Structures 229 (2019) 111430
12