Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theoretical aspects
Page | 1
3.1 Management:
Page | 2
3.4 HR responsibilities:
The core responsibilities of HR include transactional and functional activities, such as-
b) Training & Development: After selecting and recruiting individuals in the right
position of the organization the next function is to train and develop them, so that they
can become efficient employees and work toward the achievement of the organization
goal.
c) Motivation: The motivation function is one of the most important functions. After
training and developing the employees the HR manager should stimulate them to work
well. For motivation purpose the HR manager have to give the employees some
compensation and benefit package.
Page | 3
d) Maintenance: The last phase of the HRM function is called the maintenance
function. For maintaining the people HRM should go for some method of providing a
safe and healthy work place, labor relation & collective bargaining.
Page | 4
3.6.1 Importance of performance appraisal for employees:
1. Feedback: This provides a structured format for the discussion of performance issues
on a regular basis.
Page | 5
3.6.2 Key elements of performance appraisal system:
Goal Setting
Collaboration, Feedback,
Teamwork, Review,
Communication Appraisal
Reward&
Development
Recognition
Page | 6
3.6.3 Employees feedback in performance appraisal:
Feedback is given a lot of importance in the performance appraisal process. This is the
stage in which the employee acquires awareness from the appraiser about the areas of
improvements and also information on whether the employee is contributing the
expected levels of performance or not.
The employee receives an open and a very transparent feedback and along with this the
training and development needs of the employee meets the expected outcomes for an
organization through effective personal counseling and guidance, mentoring and
representing the employees and training programs which develop the competencies and
improve the overall productivity.
4. Peer appraisal: For peer appraisal, members of a group evaluate and appraise
the performance of their fellow group members.
Page | 7
3.6.4 People who conduct 360 degree performance appraisal in
organization:
Superiors
Customers customers
Suppliers Suppliers
Subordinates
Page | 8
3.6.5 Performance appraisal process:
The first step in the performance appraisal process is the setting of standards of
performance expected from the employees. The standards set should be the line with the
objectives and the mission of the organization.
It is not enough if just the standards are fixed. The expected level of performance should
be communicated to the employees so that they are all well aware of what is expected of
them.
Page | 9
3. Measuring the actual performance:
This is a crucial step in the performance appraisal process. Here the actual performances
are measured. There are various methods of measuring the performance.
Once the standard levels of performance are set and the actual performances are
measured, the next step will be the comparison of the actual with the standard
performance. This comparison will enable the determination of the gap between the
actual and the expected performance; such gaps can be bridged through training and
development.
5. Discussing results(Feedback):
The performance appraisal process does not end with mere evaluation of the
performance. It is essential to provide feedback to the employees on their performance.
This will help the employees to identify the weak areas and initiate actions to overcome
them. Such feedback motivates them to perform better in future by avoiding the
repetition of the same mistakes.
6. Decision making:
When a gap is found between the actual and the expected level of performance,
corrective actions should be undertaken. By analyzing the reason for a gap, proper action
should be taken so that the gap is bridged. When the actual and the standard performance
match there is no need for any corrective action.
Quantity: Specifies how much work must be completed within a certain period
of time.
Quality: Describes how well the work must be accomplished. Specifies
accuracy, precision, appearance or effectiveness.
Page | 10
Timeliness: Answers the questions, by when?, How soon?, Or within that
period?
Effective use of resources: Used when performance can be assessed in terms of
utilization of resources: money saved, waste reduced.
Effects of effort: Addresses the ultimate effect to be obtained; expands
statements of effectiveness by using phrases such as: so that, in order to, or as
shown by.
Manner of performance: Describes condition in which an individual's personal
behavior has an effect in performance.
Method of performing assignments: Describes requirements; used when only
the officially prescribed policy, procedure, or rule for accomplishing the work is
acceptable.
Broadly all methods of appraisals can be divided into two different categories:
which employees’ are ranked on certain criteria such as trait or characteristic. The
employee is ranked from highest to lowest or from worst to best in an organization. Thus
if there are seven employees to be ranked then there will be seven ranks from 1 to 7.
Page | 11
3. Grading Method: In this method, certain categories are defined well in advance and
employees are put in particular category depending on their traits and characteristics.
Such categories may be defined as outstanding, good, average, poor, very poor, or may
be in terms of alphabet like A, B, C, D, etc. where A may indicate the best and D
indicating the worst. This type of grading method is applied during Semester pattern of
examinations. One of the major limitations of this method is that the rater may rate many
employees on the better side of their performance.
4. Forced Distribution Method: This method was evolved to abolish the trend of rating
most of the employees at a higher end of the scale. The fundamental assumption in this
method is that employees’ performance level conforms to a normal statistical
distribution.
5. Rating Scales: This is the simplest and most popular technique for appraising
employee performance. The typical rating-scale system consists of several numerical
scales, each representing a job-related performance criterion such as dependability,
initiative, output, attendance, attitude, co-operation, and the like. Each scale ranges from
excellent to poor. Rating scales offer the advantages of adaptability, relatively easy use
and low cost.
6. Checklist: Under this method, a checklist of statements on the traits of the employee
in the form of yes or no based questions is prepared. Here rater only does the reporting or
checking and HR department does the actual evaluation.
7. Forced Choice Method: In this, the rater is given a series of statements about an
employee. These statements are arranged in blocks of two or more, and the rater
indicates which statement is most or least descriptive of the employee. HR department
does actual assessment.
Page | 12
9. Performance Test and Observations: With a limited number of jobs, employee
assessment may be based upon a test of knowledge or skills. The test may be of the
paper-and-pencil variety or an actual demonstration of skills. The test must be reliable
and validated to be useful. Even then, performance tests are apt to measure potential
more than actual performance. In order for the test to be job related, observations should
be made under circumstances likely to be encountered. Practicality may suffer if costs of
test development or administration are high.
2. Assessment Centers: Mainly used for executive hiring, assessment centers are now
being used for evaluating executive or supervisory potential. An assessment centre is a
central location where managers may come together to have their participation in job-
related exercises evaluated by trained observers. The principal idea is to evaluate
managers over a period of time, say one to three days, by observing (and later
evaluating) their behavior across a series of select exercises or work samples.
3. 360-Degree Feedback: As said above, where multiple raters are involves in
evaluating performance, the technique is called 360-degree appraisal. The 360-degree
technique is understood as systematic collection of performance data on an individual or
group, derived from a number of stakeholders- the stakeholders being the immediate
supervisors, team members, customers, peers and self. In fact, anyone who has useful
information on ‘how an employee does the job’ may be one of the appraisers.
Page | 13
Page | 14