You are on page 1of 3

OBLIGATIONS and CONTRACTS DIGEST COMPILATION ASSIGNMENTS 24. Dela Rosa vs. BPI, 51 Phil.

926

ARCIDE CABIJE
Sources of Obligations: 25. Lizares vs. Hernaez, 40 Phil. 981 [G.R. No. 14977]
1. Sagrada Orden vs Nacoco, 91 Phi! 503 [G.R. No. L-3756] 26. Bachrach Motor Co. vs. Lee Tay, 90 Phil 540 [G.R. No. L-3885]
2. Pelayo vs Lauron, 12 Phil. 44—or 4-93 [G.R. No. L-4089] 27. Lawyers Coop. Pub. vs. Tabora, 13 SCRA 762 [G.R. No. L-21263]
3. Leung Ben vs. O'Brien, 38 Phil. 182 [G.R. No. L-13602] 28. Co vs. CA, GR 124922, June 22, 1998
4. People's Car vs. Commando Security, 51 SCRA 40 [G.R. No. L-36840] 29. Aerospace vs. CA, GR 108129, Sept. 23, 1999
5. Pichel vs Alonzo, 111 SCRA 341 [G.R. No. L-36902]

UY LENTORIO
6. Del Rio vs. Palanca, 83 Phil. 867 [G.R. No. L-1271] Non-fulfillment
7. People vs Ritter, 194 SCRA 690 [G.R. No. 88582] 30. Telefast vs. Castro. 158 SCRA 445 [G.R. No. 73867]
8. Andamo vs. IAC, 191 SCRA 195 [G.R. No. 74761] 31. Tanguiling Vs. CA, GR 117190, Jan. 2, 1997
10. Brinas vs. The People, G.R. No. L-30309. November 25, 1983 32. Perez vs. CA, GR No 107737, Oct. 1, 1999
11. Tan vs. Nitafan, G.R. No. 76965. March 11, 1994 Fraud
12. People vs. Abungan, G.R. No. 136843. September 28, 2000 33. Board of Liquidators vs Heirs of Maximo Kalaw 20 SCRA 987, G.R. No. L-
18805
PORCINA 34. lCB vs. Gueco, GR 141968, Feb. 12, 2001
Obligation to GIVE a Determinate Thing
13. Equatorial vs Mayfair. G R. No. 106063. November 21. 1996 DIANA
14. De Leon vs. Soriano. [G R No. L-2724 August 24 1950 Negligence
Obligation to GIVE a Generic Thing 35. Necessito vs Paras, GR L 10605-06, June 30, 1958
15. Norkis vs CA, G. .R No 91029, February 7, 1991 Convention of the tenor of the obligation
16. Phil. Long Distance Co. vs. Jeturian, 97 Phil. 78 36. Arrieta vs. Noric, 10 SCRA 79, G.R. No. L-15645
37. Chavez vs. Gonzales, 32 SCRA 547, [2008-G.R. No. 168338]
DE VILLA Effect of fortuitous event
Effect of Loss 35. Necessito vs Paras, GR L 10605-06, June 30, 1958
17. Bunge Corp. vs. Cannenforte , G P. No L-4440 August 29, 1952
18. Occena vs Jabson. 73 SCRA 637 DONGGAY
Obligation to DO 38. Ampang vs. Guinoo, 92 Phil 1085 [April 30, 1953]
19. Hahn vs. CA G. No L-55372. May 31, 1989 39. Victorias Planters vs. Victorian Milling, 97 Phi! 18, [G.R. No. L-6648]
20. Chaves vs. Gonzales, 32 SCRA 547 40. La Mallorca vs. De Jesus, 17 SCRA 23 [G.R. No. L-21486]
Nakpil vs. CA, 144 SCRA 696 [G.R. No. L-47851]
JAUGAN 41. Austria vs. CA, 39 SCRA 527
21. Woodhouse vs. Halili, 93 Phil. 526
18. Occena vs Jabson. 73 SCRA 637 CATACUTAN
Delay in Performance 42. Vasquez vs. CA, 138 SCRA 553
22. Villaruel vs. Manila Motor, 104 Phil. 926 Usurious Transactions
23. Lopez vs Tan Tioco, 8 Phil. 926
43. Angel Jose Warehousing Co. vs. Chelda, 23 SCRA 119
44. Briones vs. Cammayo, 41 SCPA 404
Presumption of Interest and Installments Retroactivity of Obligation
45. Hill vs. Veloso, 31 Phil. 160 63. Padilla vs. Paterno, 3 SCRA 678
64. Coronel vs. CA, G.R. No. 103577. October 7, 1996
TALEON Rescission in Reciprocal Obligations
46. Vda. De Ongsiako vs. Cabatuando, 105 Phil. 1262 65. llego vs. Interbank, 37 Phil. 631
Action Subrogation
47. Goldstar Mining vs. Lim Jimena, 25 SCRA 597 CONCEPCION
48. Estate of Hernandez vs. Luzon Surety, 100 Phil 388 66. Albert vs. University Publishing, G.R. No. L-9300. April 18, 1958
67. UP vs. Delos Angeles, 33 SCRA 102
CULMINAS 68. Roque vs. Lapuz, G.R. 32811, March 31, 1980
Kinds of Obligations: PURE 69. Fera vs. Leviste G.R. No. 55744. February 28, 1985
49. Pay vs. Palance, 57 SCRA 618 70. Zulueta vs. Mariano, 111 SCRA 206
Kinds of Obligations: CONDITIONAL - SUSPENSIVE AND RESOLUTORY
50. Lichauco vs Figueras-Hermanos. 7 Phil 383 GAMALLO
51. Wise & Co vs Kelly, G R No. L- 11073 February 21, 1918 71. DeIta Motor Corp vs. Gentino, 170
52. Santiago vs. Millar, 68 Phil. 39 Obligations with a period
72. PNB vs Lopes Vito, 84 Phil. 542
DAGPIN 55. Smith Bell vs. Sotelo Matti, 44 Phil. 874
53. Parks vs. Prov. of Tarlac, 49 Phil. 142 73. Gaite vs. Fonacier, 2 SCRA 830
Kinds of Obligations: CONDITIONS - POTESTIVE 74. ___________ vs CA, 66 SCRA 523
54. Shotwell vs. Manila Motor, G.R. No. L-7637. December 29, 1956 ,
55. Smith Bell vs. Sotelo Matti, 44 Phil. 874 MALCAMPO
56. Trilliana vs. Quezon Colleges, 93 Phil. 383 75. Sarmiento vs. Villasenor, 43 Phil 880
76. Daguhoy Enterprises vs Ponce. 96 Phil 15
ACAS 77. NPC vs EIR, Nov. 14, 1986
57. Osmena vs. Rama, 14 Phil. 99 78. Lao Sok vs. Sabay, Aug. 9, 1985
58. Hermosa vs Longara. 93 Phil, 971
Kinds of Obligations: CONDITIONS - IMPOSSIBLE AND ILLICIT YBIO
59. Urdaneta Motor Co. vs. Abad, 67 Phil 79. Arquero vs. RCPI, Dec. 20, 1988
Constructive Fulfilment 80. BPI vs. Bullalia, Dec. 14, 2001
60. Taylor vs. Uy Tieng, 43 Phil. 760 81. Naviera vs. CA, Dec. 14, 1987
82. Baliwag Trans vs. CA, Jan. 31, 1989
BANQUERIGO 83. Adoracion Cruz vs CA, July 27, 1998
61. Herrera, vs. Leviste, G.R. No. 55744, February 28, 1985
62. Tayag vs. CA, G.R. No. 96053. March 3, 1993 LIU
84. People vs. Lacap, Oct. 23, 2001
85. Bataan seedling vs RP july 2 2002
86. Rcpi vs ca aug 29 1986
87. LL and Company Dev vs Huang March 7 2002
88. FGU vs GP Sarmiento Aug 6 2002

DELOS SANTOS
89. Villanueva vs Castaneda sept 21 1987
90. Leal vs IAC Nov 5 1987
91. Topwell Manufacturing vs ECED et al Sept 9 1985
92. UCPB vs Masagana April 4, 2002
93. San Miguel vs NLRC May 31 1988
94. Quano vs CA July 23 1992

GANIR
95. Siredy Ent vs CA sept 17 2002
96. House Intl. vs IAC June 13 1987
97. Liang vs CA Jan 13 1989
98. Associated Bank vs Sarmiento June 29 1998
99. Yu vs CA Jan 21 1993
100. Malbarosa vs CA April 30 2003

FILIPINAS
101. Batchelder case (circulars are not contracts)
102. Que vs Arellano Univ (stipulation is void being contrary to public
policy as it violates the definition of scholarship, being given out of
merit.)
103. Saura vs Sandico (political rights are outside the commerce of men)
104. Velasco vs CA (Art 1729, Accion Directa)
105. Koffman vs PNP (Art 1311(2) Stipulation pour Atrui
106. Sanchez vs Rigos

You might also like