Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bearing Capacity of Concrete Blocks or Rock (69-1) PDF
Bearing Capacity of Concrete Blocks or Rock (69-1) PDF
Lehigh Preserve
Fritz Laboratory Reports Civil and Environmental Engineering
1969
D. C. Drucker
Recommended Citation
Chen, W. F. and Drucker, D. C., "Bearing capacity of concrete blocks or rock (69-1) " (1969). Fritz Laboratory Reports. Paper 1993.
http://preserve.lehigh.edu/engr-civil-environmental-fritz-lab-reports/1993
This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted
for inclusion in Fritz Laboratory Reports by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact
preserve@lehigh.edu.
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE BEARING
by
Michael W. Hyland
jrogram Director
Dr. Lambert Tall
Project Supervisor
Dr. Wai-Fah Chen
. February 1969
,II TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. PREVIOUS WORK 3
3. EXPERIMENTAL WORK 5
,.
4. RESULTS 11
5. CONCLUSIONS 16
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 18
7. REFERENCES 19
f .
.
'
-1
1. INTRODUCTION
conservative. (1,2)
(4 5)
by Chen and Drucker ' assume concrete to behave in a prefectly
tests are compared with the predicted values, after Chen and
Drucker.
-3
2. PREVIOUS WORK
•
(7)
Previous load tests have been made; Meyerhof ,
area again has never been undertaken. It was felt that this
reported here.
\ .
-5
3. EXPERIMENTAL WORK
"
3.1 Specimens
3:2 Materials
mixes. The "mortar" mix was made with sand and cement only,
while the concrete mix contained sand, cement, and 1/2 in.
Fig. 3.
Mortar:
with only two layers. The specimens with holes were cast with
a steel pipe placed in the center of the mold and covered with
shown in Fig. 4.
-7
thick and 1.5 and 2.0 in. in diameter, all surfaces machined.
maximum eccentricity of the hole in all tests was 1/4 in. from
SR-4 Type A-X-5 with gage factors varying between 1.98 and 2.04.
position for'testing.
-8
, curing room at about 7soF for four days; six days in tests
by scheduling problems.
recorder, and about 1/2 minute when using the digital recorder.
to 1 kip.
-9
inserted into the hole, and then inflated with air, forcing
the gage against the inside cylinder wall. After each test,
errors that may have been more truly negligible had the scale
-10
inch specimen.
4. RESULTS
loaded tests.
two data sets out of six does the steel base specimen strength
in specimens with and without the center hole! and in both type
either the steel base or the teflon base specimen. The double
does the steel base specimen, with the teflon base specimen
for test results when H/2a is less than 2.0. For H/2a
conclusions are evident, and the need for further study exists
in some areas.
a. Friction effect.
Capacity.
Capacity.
e. Effect of Hole.
\ )
The results of'tests on specimens
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
. .
-19
7. REFERENCES
1. Hawkins, N. M.
THE BEARING STRENGTH OF CONCRETE LOADED
THROUGH RIGID PLATES, Magazine of Concrete
Research Vol. 20, No.2, March 1968, pp. 31-40.
2. Shelson, William
BEARING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE, Journal of the
American Concrete Institute, Vol. 29, No.5,
November 1957, Proceedings Vol. 54, pp. 405-414.
3. Guyon, Y.
CONTRAINTES DANS LES PIECES PRISMATIQUES
SOUMISES A DES FORCES APPLIQUEES SUR LEURS
BASES~ A VOISINAGE DE CES BASES, Publications,
,International Association for Bridge and
Structural Engineering (Zurich), Vol. XI,
1951, pp. 165-226.
5. Chen, W. F.
ENTENSIBILITY OF CONCRETE OR ROCK AND THE
THEOREMS OF LIMIT ANALYSIS, Lehigh University
Institute of Research Publication, Fritz
Engineering Laboratory Report No. 356.5,
November ~ 19'68.
7. Meyerhof, G. G.
THE BEARING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE AND ROCK,
Magazine of Concrete Research, April 1953,
pp. 107-116.
9. Shah, H. H.
STUDY OF SURFACE-FRICTION OF A CYLINDRICAL
SPECIMEN, Masters Thesis, New Mexico State
University, University Park, New Mexico,
August, 1966. .
11. Thaulow, S.
INNFLYTELSEN AV FRIKSJONEN I TRYKKFLATNE
VED BESTEMMELSE AV BETONGENS TRYKKFASTHET
MED PROVE-LEGMER AV FORSKJELLIG HOYDE,
Nordisk Betong, Stockholm, nr. 4, 1960,
pp. 321-24. .
12. Kap la n, M. F.
STRAINS AND STRESSES OF CONCRETE AT
INITIATION OF CRACKING AND NEAR FAILURE,
Journal of the American Concrete Institute,
Vol. 60, pp. 853-879, July 1963.
-21
..
.]
-, ,
.
_._-_.~-----~
)
.. _.....--- L-;;:. . .:.. . . . ~ ...•, :"_.....__...... _I' • _-:, . . . . .
,~ .
TABLE 1·
SPECIMEN CONFIGURATION
,
s Make Type Punch Cylinder Number Tested
e Diameter Height Steel Teflon Double
t (in. ) (in. ) Base Base Punch
1 6 3 3 3
2 1.5 3 3 3 3
0
3 ; '-' 2 3 3 3
4 ....J 6 3 3 3
0
5- P::: U) 2.0 3 3 3 3
<t:
6 E-< 2 3 3 3
7 P::: 6 3 3 3
0
8 ::<:: 1.5 3 3 3 3
9 ::r::r.Ll 2 3 3 3
1 O~': E-<....=l 6 4 4 4
HO
11 ::;::::r:: 2.0 6 3 3 3
12 3 3 \
3 3
13 2 3 3 3
14 6 3 3 3
15 0 1.5 3 3 3 3.
H 2 3 3 3
16 ....=l
17 ·0 6 3 3 3
r.Ll U)
18 E-< 2.0 3 3 3 3
19 r.Ll 2 3 3 3
P:::
20 u 6 3 a 3
21
z 1.5 3 3 0 3
0
22 u ::r::r.Ll 2 3 0 3
E-<....=l
23 HO 6 3 0 3
::;::::r::
24 2.0 3 3 0 3
25 2 3 0 3
TABLE 2
1 LO
6 15,180 16,300 13,400 4.7 8.5 6.8
2
3
0
H
·
...-l
3
2
11,750
9,140
11,400
9,830
14,950
11,620
8.7
3.0
20.
9.4
5.1
3.8
....:l
4 0
(/) 0
6 8,260 9,440' 9,300 6.2 4.7 <5
5
6 ~ N · 3.
2
7,530
8,840
5,800
6,570
8,270
7,220
12.7
3.2
15.7
6.7
<5
8.3
<l;
7 Eo-< 6 16,.090 16,400 17,150 <5 4.9 4.2
~ LO
8
9
0
::8
~
....:l
·
...-l
3
2
" 10,580
8,980
9,250
8,460
18,030
13,770
<5
50
20
7.8
2.3
4.3
0
10;' ::c: 6 11,650 11,450 11,850 - - -
11 ::c: 0 6 8,960 8,370 9,570 <5 5.0 <5
12 Eo-<
H N
· 3 6,820 6,910 11,070 , <5 6.8 8.2
13 ::;:: 2 5,400 5,950 7,330 11.7 15.8 12.4
14 6 12,200 12,970 20,650 4.7 10.1 <5
15 :
0 ..
LO
3 18,475 12,100 18,270 6.0 6.9 '8.6
'16 H
....:l
...-l 2 16,520 10,080 15,230 5.5 10.9 5.9
17 0
(/) 0
6 15,100 9,300 12,470 - - 10.7
I.
.cl
Height U1 t. Bearing Pressure/l. c Predicted by
+-'
(J) ~
(J)
ro
(J)
p.
.c
0
I:: ro
. in. Steel Teflon Double Chen & Drucker
U) :>.. Base Base Punch
::8 E-< ::1 .,.,
p..,p
Loading Punch
o H
Teflon
reese
--L-_ 'Cj~=:;::=:;::=:;::==================~~G
2H
P
(b) Dou ble Punch· Arrangement
Fig. 1
-26
A A
GI '
C'i:1
83
"""'4
<=>6
15
SEC. A-A
<.
0=
W
40 I---+---+----"'~_j_~_T_-_f__-_____l
-lJ..Z 20 I-----+-----+-------f--":l~~+__-__l
(ft
OL----.J..---.L..---..L--_~_.__J
20 6 2 0.6 0.2 .06
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
-
~-_._-
-,
rI
,
I
! )
!
I I
I·.
,-
.1,
-~.
. .
-29
.. ,. ..
.....
.
~
·t.
I
t
,
'1
t• __-4-.,,__....................... ~
.'\-
Fig. 5
a. "Teflon" Base Specimen with Strain
gages ready for testing.
I •
-
---
:~
---,., .. t:7':.~ -i::.:~:::.···
.. _
,:;..•..;... ..........-,.. ..'-
,
.J
_u ,
~
4.0
-I- Prediction of ~ /~ ~I\
W
a::
::)
(j)
Chen and
Drucker· .~, /~......",.----
_/
\-----,
en 3.0
w /" ~Possibie <r,
0:::: /"
'"Tj
f-'.
0- !ll IJ . Cut-off
.
()'Q
(!)
~
())
z &.
tt:
<.t
2.0
~
W
m
x
.
«
:2 1.0
&. Teflon
@ S~eel
E1 Double Punch
o 2 4
Block Area = 16 Specimen Height
Loaded Area Punch Diameter = 1.5 in. I
W
Punch Diameter o
..
-(.)
~ 4.0
·1·
W
0:::
:::>
en
Of}. /
(f)
w 3.0
0:: Prediction ~~:"""'''''''''''-----r------
'"Tj a.. Chen and \.... Possible
f-'.
.
()Q
<!> Drucker ~ Cut -off
Z ~; j~
-.l
a:: ..eP
« 2.0
w
co
x
.
«
~
1.0
A Teflon
@ Steel
~ Double Punc h
1------L------~2-----~3--------:4
o
Block Area =9. Specimen Height
Punch Diameter = 2 .in. I
Loaded Area Punch Diameter
W
i-'
TYPE - CONCRETE, SOLID
5.0 ,
~,.
4.0
-....
0"
Prediction of ' ) .
+ Chen and "/ "
w
a::
~
(J)
(J) 3.0
Drucker
/
~ I>~ .-....----
'\----1'
W
0:::
/" ~~ ~Possible
/
'"1
1-'.
a.. rm Cut-off
~
oq
<9
Z
(Xl
-a:: 2.0
<{
w.
co
x
<(
~ 1.0
& Teflon
@ Steel
[1J Double Punch
o 2 :3 4
Block Area = 16. Specimen Heighi
Loaded Area Punch Diameter =1.5 in. I
W
Punch Diameter tV
.. •
_0
..... 4.0
·1·
IJJ
0:
::>
(J)
t-rj
CJ)
w
a::::
3.0
Prediction of1 ~~ ==. . . . . . . . . - . . . . """"" '"'\:' . . . . -- ...- ....- .............. •
f-'. a.. Chen and ~~ L. Possible
.
(Jq
o 2 3 4
Block Area . =9. Specimen Heighi
Loaded Area Punch Diameter = 2.0 in. I
W
Punch Oiema'fer W
TYPE - MORTAR, WITH HOLE
26..-----,....-----r----r------,r-------,
22 1 - - - - - - 1 I - - - - ' - - - 1 - - - - 1 - - - { f - - - 4 4 . ' r - - - - - - - - - I
18 1------1-----1----+--:;----1--\\-----1
(/)
0.. 14 t-----+-----+-----w-----+---',.r-l
~
Z
o
<l
9 10
6 1-------1----v'----+---~I_---_+_---_1
H =6"
20 :: 2 11
Sieel
Base
2t-----R--t-------t-----1-:-----'---t-----I
'16 1-----+----7r-----+---~-_1_---_1
,.,~
;,~Crack Visible
at 14.1 k
C/)
e:
~
121-----+fJ-----+-----t-----t--\'I------l
Z
o
<t
o 8 1------l'--j-----+--------jf--------I---~\__1
-I
41---·fI----j-----+--------jf--------I-----1
H 2"
:i:
11
20 = 2
Steel
Base
o 100 200 300 400 500
DIAL GAGE READING I IN. x 10- 4
Fig. 12
Failure Modes
.--
"
HOriZOn~OI . . . .:
Verr1iiCal__ "'."",. .... 1[Steel IP- _
'\?-... - ... ."",. / - - -0" ~ Ba se
2 1---~--;':-t----_"""O""_·~rT-----l-----:~""'--l-----f-----l------I--------l
f-'
1 ~~Steel \ ,-,,,,//'
.
W
n Base \ /
Z ~ ..,///
t:J<:
1-"
(/l
rt rt
(1)
rj
.. 4
rj 1-'-
Z
1-'- (l W
tT(lJ
C f-'
~
rt U
1-" :r>
0 ;:J W
;:J P- o..
Cf) 6
:r>::r:
D. ouble"""'~r ,P
f-'O
0 t:: Z
\
;:J 1-'- Teflon
(JQ N
0 ::r: Punch -/" / Base
~ ~
O;:J
(1)rt
(lJ a.. n
;:J
W 4
Horizon~al \
rtf-'
rj
(lJ (J)
0 8
f-'rt
rj
r
:r>(lJ
x 1-'-
I
8
I
1-'- ;:J
(/l
I
2
I
W
-.J
-38
-
Compression
,,- ... _ g::;.- _ _ ~ -=:Ie _-=-ce::ED C::=::::=OC:Z:=:O~
-,.
.€It
. , ~ 42)t 10-5 Double
,. \ I I I' Punch
--'-3---'2'------'----'0'------'-1--2'-------'-3---
o
Compression
.~ Teflon
E Base
32023
~
Tension
5
195 X 10-
Compression /
, / A , ",.
/
", / ", , Steel
E t _~~~!.-/----II~_I'----I'----..L....---.l..1-'~. . .,.,. ~'\;).,-I _ Base
+ :3 2 I 0 2:3
Tension
/
,... -- / - -
-
,...
I I I
I +I 1+
I \
\
\
"
STEEL TEFLON
BASE BASE
• /
I
I
I
I I
1+ .
I
I
\ ..
\.
DOUBLE
PUNCH
..
2b
Failure
Cone
•
•
= f/
t
[2 b H t'a n
2
(20, + 0) - 1]
2bH-
a -2 t
a
= tan 0 + sec. 0 [1 + --:f::-c'-:------------J
,_c ~l-sin ~j -sin0:
f t 2
Fig. 16
•