You are on page 1of 76

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region III
Division of Nueva Ecija
SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
San Francisco, San Antonio, Nueva Ecija

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) - RPMS PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR SY 2018-2019
Name of Employee: ARCELI E. INTERIOR Name of Rater: ERICSON S. SABACAN, Ph.D.
Position: Principal IV Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
School: SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Division: NUEVA ECIJA

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING ACTUAL RESULTS


Weight Basic Means of Performance Indicators Midyear Year End
Specific Targets Evident Exceeded Exemplified Superb Means
MFOs KRAs per Evaluation Evaluation
and Performace Verification
KRA 4.5 4.9 5 of Verification Date: Date:
Basic 1. INSTRUCTIONAL
20%
Education LEADERSHIP
Services Instructional 2.0% Instructional  Instructional Implemented the Achieved all the Accomplished □Performance Targets
Supervision Supervision Supervisory Plan (ISP) activities stated in targets and plans more than □Gantt Chart
the ISP indicated in the ISP expected targets in □ISP and Supporting
the ISP with
improved learners
performance
3.0% Checking of  Schedule of Checking of Noted and visited Inspected and Addressed DLP □Enrichment Activities
DLLs/Lesson Plans DLLs/DLPs DLLs/DLPs of all corrected concerns and □Summary of DLL/DLP
teachers inconsistencies in provided Reflection Records
DLLs/DLPs enrichment of the
regularly DLL reflections of
teachers

2.0% Class Observation □Class Observation Tool Completed Utilized COT and Improved teaching □COT and STAR Records
required number of STAR Observation & learning process or Summary
COT religiously and through provision □Pictures and reports of
exceeded the of technical demo teaching or class
number of required assistance, demo observation
observations teaching and
□Coaching and mentoring
constant coaching
and mentoring records
observations teaching and
constant coaching
and mentoring

2.0% Holistic Assessment □Holistic Assessment Provided teachers Conducted Holistic Raised the □Development programs
Tool and Activities with different Assessment status of based on assessment
□Test Results Holistic religiously targeting assessment results
Assessment various learners through skills
development, □Pictures of Holistic
activities assessment activities
exhibits or
recitals with
Basic 2.0% Intervention □Intervention Program Supervised Conducted needs
Initiated and  Innovation or
intervention or skill strengths or Intervention Program
Education Programs remedial class intervention or
Services programs for or development
special skills
innovation which with supporting
documents
specific learners programs resulted to greater
impact
Credit Points for 2.0% Learning Resources  Learning Resource Adopted and Initiated Developed and  New multimedia and
Instructional Development Materials improved development of utilized localized or printed materials
Supervision curriculum curriculum contextualized  Instructional Materials
materials or materials and curriculum  Localized Materials
activities activities materials and  Technology Devices
activities based on
learners’ needs

3.0% Curriculum  Curriculum Offerings Enriched *Utilized enriched Supported special  Approved Special
Enrichment  Curriculum Materials classroom level curriculum curriculum (SPA, Curriculum or Offerings
activities materials ICT, SHS tracks)  Enriched curriculum
*Applying for and growing based learning materials
special curriculum on urgency and
local needs
2.0% Best Practices  Best Practices in Adapted best Practiced best for Institutionalized  Pictures of Application
Curriculum practices from practices for Best practice  Best Practices
benchmarking learners needs and addresses learning Documentation
skills deficiencies  Benchmarking
2.0% Winnings in Contest  Certificate of Participation Won in the district Won in the division Won in different  Certificate, Medal and
in co or co- academic and non- aspect in the Plaque of Recognition
curricular activities academic contest regional or national  Pictures of Winnings
competition
consistently
20.0%

II. LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT 25%

3.0% School Improvement □School Map Improved or with Ensured Established  WOW Structure
proposal to eradication of eye WOW structure, Documentation
□Modernization Program  Pictures of Improved
improve Eye Sore sore and wow facilities and
School Facilities
feature or structure modernization
projedt with high
social & academic
expectations to
improve Eye Sore sore and wow facilities and  Pictures of Improved
School Facilities
feature or structure modernization
projedt with high
social & academic
expectations to
everybody

5.0% Classroom  Pictures of all Classroom Maintained/ Improved and Developed  Pictures of 75%
Improvement and project Painted/Repaired restrcutured classroom facilties Improved Classroom
classrooms classrooms and acquired Fixtures or Facilities
 Acquired 1 project per
equipment for classroom
conducive teaching
and learning
5.0% Infrastructure Project □ Infrastructure Project Acquired any Put-up anu Constrcuted □Documentation of
Plans infrastructure infrastructure infrastructure Infrastructure project
project through projects through projects aimed □Pictures of new
others self-initiative directly to improve constructed facilities
teaching and
Basic
learning process
Education
based on
Services
urgent.priority
needs
5.0% DRRM  DRRM Plans and PAPs Installed DRRM Practiced safety, Institutionalized □Emergency Kits
provisions resilience and DRRM best □Resilience Projects
precautionary practices and □DRRM PAPs and
measures acquired Accomplishements
emergency kits and
faciltities

4.0% School Beautification  Beautification Project Projected school Promoted learning Practiced positive  Positive learning
 Learner Support Facilities aesthetic factor or environment, learning climate, environment and child-
value thermal comfort clean and green, advocate PAPs
and appealing child protection  Learner Support and
ambiance and and child friendly Service Facilities
health and environment  Pictures of Beautification
sanitation positive learning
climate, clean and
green, child
protection and
child friendly
environment

Credit Points for 3.0% School Titling □School Site Delopment Registered title to Acquired Tax Secured School □Certificate of Title
Learning Environment Plan resgistry of deeds Declaration named Title to DepEd □Project OSLO Certificate
(Plus Points) to DepEd without problems □School Site Expansion
on heirs, squatting Project
or outsiders
25.0%
III. HUMAN
RESOURCE 15%
MANAGEMENT
2.0% Technical Assistance □Technical Assistance Provided technical Surpassed the Applied the □TAPs and Aps
AND Plan (TAP) Accomplishments,
assistance and targeted TAPs and learnings and
DEVELOPMENT Reports and Pictures
□Action Plans (Aps) conducted action completed Aps insights on TAPs
plans created proof of and Aps focused □Proof of teachers as
teachers as coach, on the coaches, mentors or
mentors or trainers improvement of tainers with pictures
teaching and
learning and
holistic develoment
of teachers

2.0% In-Service Activities  INSET Plans and Encouraged 20% Employed 40% of Engaged 60%of INSETs and Reports
(INSETs) and SLAC Activities of teachers to be teachers in district teachers to be  Certificate of
 GAD Plan involved in district or higher INSET involved in division Participation or
 SLAC Schedule Recognition
or higher INSET and surpassed of higher LAC or  SLAC Reports
and SLAC activities targeted SLAC INSET activities  GAD Project/Report
plans/activities with positive
results/outcomes

Basic 2.0% Managing □IPCRF of Teachers Completed the Conveyed results Committed  Summary of Ratings
Education Performance □PMCF evaluation of performance and teachers to have  Accomplished PMCF
Services Management □RPMS teachers IPCRF evaluated teachers an improved  RPMS Reports and
and portfolio IPCRF regularly performance to ger Pictorials
following 4 Phases an Oustanding  PBB Best School
rating
2.0% Creating Professional  PPST SAT Analysis *Encouraged Established Enjoined  PPST Needs Analysis and
Learning and  HRD or Learning and teachers to join professional stakeholders and Action Plans
Development (L&D) Development (L&D) professional learning support to partnership to  Teachers Professional
Plans
Community learning group address teachers support PAPs for Groups
*Analyzed PPST requests and teachers  MOA and MOU on
needs for teachers concerns. professionalism, teachers welfare and
and school officials *Conducted scholarship and development
learning and professional L&D personal growth  Established professional
development (L&D) and development L&D
based on PPST
Needs Analysis
and Action Plans

1.0% Incentives Welfare  Welfare and Benefits Checked pertinent Assisted teachers Helped teachers  Incentive or Benefits
and Benefits  PSIPOP papers of teachers get incentives like receive incentives Documentation
(i.e. salary, plantilla scholarship, other through monetary  Cooperative Reports
item, bonus, etc. ) welfare and assistance and  Processed Papers
benefits from arranged teachers
stakeholders welfare and
(i.e. salary, plantilla scholarship, other through monetary  Cooperative Reports
item, bonus, etc. ) welfare and assistance and  Processed Papers
benefits from arranged teachers
stakeholders welfare and
benefits in any
form.

Credit Points for 2.0% Exposure, Rewards  Designation Order Recognized efforts Guided school Honed teachers to  Recognition Program
Human Resource and Recognitions  Rewards and Initiatives of school officials officials or teachers get awards or  Certificate of Recognition
Management and  Recognition Program through awards or to receive awards recognition and  Memo of the Search
Development (Plus development or exposure for exposure which is  Professional/Personal
Points) program personal and institutionalized for Development Programs
professional their personal or
development professional growth
and development

3.0% Education and  201 File Motivated 25% of Assisted 50% of Facilitated 25% of  List of Teachers’
Promotion  Summary of Teachers Teachers to pursue Teachers in teachers to have Educational Attainment
Information graduate studies pursuing graduate finished graduate  TORs and Diploma of
Teachers
and apply for studies and in studies and helped  Appointment of
promotion applying for get promotion or Promoted Personnel
promotion reclassification
1.0% Conflict Management □Rubrics on Conflict *Provided *Addresed *Resolved internal □Feedback Mechanism
and Feedback Resolution feedback or negative feedbacks and external Documentation
System □Feedback system suggestion box conflicts □Certificate of Conflict
*No complaints or *No conflicts, *No administrative Resolution given by
conflicts but with complaints or DTxt case, complaints, immediate superior and
slight issues or malicious text or conflicts, malicious monitoring EPS
internal issues issues and Dtext
15.0%

Basic IV. PARENTS 15%


Education INVOLVEMENT
Services AND COMMUNITY 3.0% Parents Involvement  FPTA PAPs PAPs PAPs PAPs  PAPs Documentation
PARTNERSHIP  Homeroom Class PAPs amounting to: amounting to: amounting to:  PAPs Certification
 Deed of Donation
PI- P26-50K PI- P51-75K PI- P76K  PTA Resolutions
PII- P51-75K PII- P76- and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P76- 100K PII- P101K  Financial Statements
100K PIII- P101- and above
P-IV- P101- 125K PIII- P126K
150K P-IV- P151- and above
3.0% Community  Social Mobilization PAPs PAPs PAPs  PAPs Documentation
Plan 200K P-IV- P250K
Partnership amounting to: amounting to: amounting
and above to:  PAPs Certification
 List of Stakeholders  Immersion Partnership
PI- P101- PI- P151- PI- P251K
150K 250K and above  Financial Reports
PII- P301- PII- P401- PII- P501K  Deed of Donation
400K 500K and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P501- PIII- P601- PIII- P751K  LGU or SEF or
600K 750K and above Stakeholders PAPs
150K 250K and above  Financial Reports
PII- P301- PII- P401- PII- P501K  Deed of Donation
400K 500K and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P501- PIII- P601- PIII- P751K  LGU or SEF or
600K 750K and above Stakeholders PAPs
P-IV- P501- P-IV- P701- P-IV- P1M and
4.0% Brigada Eskwela PAPs
700K PAPs
1MK PAPs
above  Brigada Eskwela
amounting to: amounting to: amounting to: Documentation
PI- P50K to PI- P76K to PI- P100K  Certificate or Plaque of
75K 99K to 199K Recognition
PII- P100 to PII- P151 to PII- P200 to  Won in the regional or
150K 199K 399K national competition
PIII- P150K PIII- P200K PIII- P400K
Credit Points for 5.0% Donations and  Income Generating PAPs PAPs PAPs  Adopt-A-School Program
Project to 199K to 399K to 799K
Parents Involvement Projects (not from amounting
P-IV- P250Kto:
to amounting
P-IV- P500Kto:
to amounting to:
P-IV- P800K to Documents
and Community LGU, SEF or MOOE)  Financial Reports PI-
499K P50-75K PI-
799K P76- PI-
1.2M P101K  PAPs Documentation
 Resolutions
Partnership (Plus PII- P76- 100K and above  PAPs Certification
Points) 100K PII- P101- PII- P201K  Financial Reports
PIII- P101- 199K and above  Deed of Donation
150K PIII- P151- PIII- P301K
15.0%
P-IV- P151- 299K and above
250K P-IV- P251- P-IV- P501K
Basic V. SCHOOL 20% 500K and above
Education LEADERSHIP,
Services MANAGEMENT I.A. School Performance Improvement
AND OPERATIONS 2.0% Access  SF 4 At least 3% At least 5% At least 7%  Community Mapping
 Performance Indicators increase. Or 3.0- increase. increase.  SF Form 2 and 4
last 5 years (Drop-Out, 4.99% Or 5.0-6.99% Or 7.0% and above (Improved Participation
Cohort Survival and Rate)
Completion Rate)
1.0% Efficiency At most 2% At most 4% Has 0 RP or more Performance Indicators with
decrease Or 0.01- decrease Or 2.01 – than 4%. Or 4.01 improved Drop-Out, Cohort
2.0 4.0 and above Survival and Completion Rate
with Supporting Document

3.0% SBM Level of  SBM Level of Performance SBM Level I SBM Level II SBM Level III  SBM Level III of Practice
Practice Certificate Certificate
2.0% Educational Planning  eSIP Involved and Implemented and Institutionalized  AIP Quarterly Report
 AIP and APP reported school outdid the specified strategic planning based on SMEPA
Basic  School Planning and plans and targets plans in eSIP for and accomplishing  School Report Card
Education Quality Assurance Team to school and the current school plans with focused  SOSA
Services stakeholders year on DepEd VMO  Implemented APP
based on school  Accomplishment Report
priority needs  Data Mapping Tool

2.0% Records □e-BEIS/LIS *Updated School *Utilized IT system *Unified personnel  Validated Government
Management □Inventory Report Forms, eBEIS, LIS and updated on organized and School Program
and pertinent reports on systematic  Compilation of Memo
Receipts, Index and
records accurately with reporting on time School Inventory
*Conducted reporoduction and accurately with  Inspection r
2.0% Records *Updated School *Utilized IT system *Unified personnel  Validated Government
Management Forms, eBEIS, LIS and updated on organized and School Program
and pertinent reports on systematic  Compilation of Memo
Receipts, Index and
records accurately with reporting on time School Inventory
*Conducted reporoduction and accurately with  Inspection r
physical inventorymaterials and reproduction
supplies materials and
supplies
2.0% MOOE Liquidation  Work Financial Plan Recorded MOOE Reported MOOE *Revitalized 100%  Certified No AOM, ND or
 Liquidation Report liquidation and liquidation and MOOE properly NS from COA
 CDR financial reports without late and judiciously  Implemented and
 Bank Account
with accuracy submission *No AOM from completed Work Financial
*Put-up additional COA Plans
PAPs from MOOE *All WFP targets  Certificate of Good
have been Liquidator
implemented and
reported to
stakeholders

2.0% Management of  Canteen Funds Updated other Posted or Reported other  Picture of Transparency
Other School Funds  Other Funds financial records published financial funds to school Board
 Transparency Board Transparency work and other and stakeholders  Records of Other School-
Board school funds in who are entrusted Managed Funds/Financial
SRC or with authority, Aids
Transparency responsibility and
Board accountability

2.0% Monitoring and  SMEPA Conducted SMEPA Completed SMEPA Complied results of  SMEPA Report
Evaluation  M&E Program and performance and school-initiated M&E with greater  Results of M&E Program
target M&E programs impact on teaching  Accomplished
accomplishment and learning and Performance Targets
administrative
services
2.0% Abeyance to DepED  No Collection Policy Following DepED Adhered to no Strictly  Certificate or Mechanism
Orders and  Child Protection Policy policy with DepED policy adhered to no of No Collection Policy
Memorandum activities (selective: with DepED policy  Resolutions
enrolment, such as  Deed of Donations or
resolution
absolute no
graduation, (selective: Financial Aid
collection
classroom or enrolment, (enrolment,
school level) graduation, graduation,
classroom or classroom and
Credit Points for 1.0% Use of Technology in  Computer and Printer in Utilized computer United
school information
level) Updated IT and
school level)  ICT and reproduction
School Leadership, SMO the Office in preparing and and media
but w/ less literacy media literacy
but still withand equipment
Management and  Social Media application recording reports and improved to
equipment equipment to
impact  Social Media System
Operations (Plus and support school facilitate  Pictures of Office Solutions
outputs
Points) communication. operations liquidation, & Upgrade
recording, student
1.0% WOW Factor  P1M project *Received high- *Acquired extra- *Put-up innovative  PAPs documentation
tracking and
 Winnings or Participation end facility or P1M ordinary project project (something  Certificate of Merit or
operations
Basic in recognized activities project amounting to P1M new and never Participation
Education *Champion in the *Champion in the been seen PAPs)  MOA/MOU of Sustainable
Services regional citations national citations *Won/Participated Support
in the International  Picture of the WOW
Credit Points for
School Leadership,
Management and
Operations (Plus
Points)
1.0% WOW Factor  P1M project *Received high- *Acquired extra- *Put-up innovative  PAPs documentation
 Winnings or Participation end facility or P1M ordinary project project (something  Certificate of Merit or
Basic in recognized activities project amounting to P1M new and never Participation
Education *Champion in the *Champion in the been seen PAPs)  MOA/MOU of Sustainable
Services regional citations national citations *Won/Participated Support
in the International  Picture of the WOW
activities

20.0%

PLUS FACTOR 5.0%

5.0% Other Performed  Memo of the PAPs or *Acted as chair, *Served as chair, *Performed more  Output of the PAP
Functions and INSETs or Organizations judge or facilitator evaluator, trainer or than as writer,  Certificate of Recognition
Services  Program and Invitation in INSET or PAPs member of TWG validator, evaluator  Picture of the event
or professional in INSETs, PAPs or or coordinator or  ID orl Membership Oath of
clubs or 1 or more clubs in SDO or 3 chair of SDO or Office
coordinatorship or more other agency PAPs
within the district or coordinatorship in or regional
municipality the district or professional club
higher office

5.0%

ARCELI E. INTERIOR
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES Ratee
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding _________________________________
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory Rater
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor ______________________________________ _____________________________

Recommending Approval Approving Authority


he Philippines page 1
of Education
on III
Nueva Ecija
IONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Antonio, Nueva Ecija

OPCRF) - RPMS PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR SY 2018-2019


ERICSON S. SABACAN, Ph.D.
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

ACTUAL RESULTS

Rating Score
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
p6
___________________________________

Approving Authority
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III
Division of Nueva Ecija
SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
San Francisco, San Antonio, Nueva Ecija

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) - RPMS PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR SY 2018-2019
Name of Employee: ARCELI E. INTERIOR Name of Rater:
Position: Principal IV Position:
School: SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Division: NUEVA ECIJA

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING ACTUAL RESULTS


Weight Basic Means of Performance Indicators Midyear Year End
Specific Targets Evident Exceeded Exemplified Superb Means
MFOs KRAs per Evaluation Evaluation
and Performace Verification
KRA 4.5 4.9 5 of Verification Date: Date:
Basic 1. INSTRUCTIONAL
20%
Education LEADERSHIP
Services Instructional 2.0% Instructional  Instructional Implemented the Achieved all the Accomplished □Performance Targets
Supervision Supervision Supervisory Plan (ISP) activities stated in targets and plans more than □Gantt Chart
the ISP indicated in the ISP expected targets in □ISP and Supporting
the ISP with
improved learners
performance
3.0% Checking of  Schedule of Checking of Noted and visited Inspected and Addressed DLP □Enrichment Activities
DLLs/Lesson Plans DLLs/DLPs DLLs/DLPs of all corrected concerns and □Summary of DLL/DLP
teachers inconsistencies in provided Reflection Records
DLLs/DLPs enrichment of the
regularly DLL reflections of
teachers

2.0% Class Observation □Class Observation Tool Completed Utilized COT and Improved teaching □COT and STAR Records
required number of STAR Observation & learning process or Summary
COT religiously and through provision □Pictures and reports of
exceeded the of technical demo teaching or class
number of required assistance, demo observation
observations teaching and
□Coaching and mentoring
constant coaching
and mentoring records
observations teaching and
constant coaching
and mentoring

2.0% Holistic Assessment □Holistic Assessment Provided teachers Conducted Holistic Raised the □Development programs
Tool and Activities with different Assessment status of based on assessment
□Test Results Holistic religiously targeting assessment results
Assessment various learners through skills
development, □Pictures of Holistic
activities assessment activities
exhibits or
recitals with
Basic 2.0% Intervention □Intervention Program Supervised Conducted needs
Initiated and  Innovation or
intervention or skill strengths or Intervention Program
Education Programs remedial class intervention or
Services programs for or development
special skills
innovation which with supporting
documents
specific learners programs resulted to greater
impact
Credit Points for 2.0% Learning Resources  Learning Resource Adopted and Initiated Developed and  New multimedia and
Instructional Development Materials improved development of utilized localized or printed materials
Supervision curriculum curriculum contextualized  Instructional Materials
materials or materials and curriculum  Localized Materials
activities activities materials and  Technology Devices
activities based on
learners’ needs

3.0% Curriculum  Curriculum Offerings Enriched *Utilized enriched Supported special  Approved Special
Enrichment  Curriculum Materials classroom level curriculum curriculum (SPA, Curriculum or Offerings
activities materials ICT, SHS tracks)  Enriched curriculum
*Applying for and growing based learning materials
special curriculum on urgency and
local needs
2.0% Best Practices  Best Practices in Adapted best Practiced best for Institutionalized  Pictures of Application
Curriculum practices from practices for Best practice  Best Practices
benchmarking learners needs and addresses learning Documentation
skills deficiencies  Benchmarking
2.0% Winnings in Contest  Certificate of Participation Won in the district Won in the division Won in different  Certificate, Medal and
in co or co- academic and non- aspect in the Plaque of Recognition
curricular activities academic contest regional or national  Pictures of Winnings
competition
consistently
20.0%

II. LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT 25%

3.0% School Improvement □School Map Improved or with Ensured Established  WOW Structure
proposal to eradication of eye WOW structure, Documentation
□Modernization Program  Pictures of Improved
improve Eye Sore sore and wow facilities and
School Facilities
feature or structure modernization
projedt with high
social & academic
expectations to
improve Eye Sore sore and wow facilities and  Pictures of Improved
School Facilities
feature or structure modernization
projedt with high
social & academic
expectations to
everybody

5.0% Classroom  Pictures of all Classroom Maintained/ Improved and Developed  Pictures of 75%
Improvement and project Painted/Repaired restrcutured classroom facilties Improved Classroom
classrooms classrooms and acquired Fixtures or Facilities
 Acquired 1 project per
equipment for classroom
conducive teaching
and learning
5.0% Infrastructure Project □ Infrastructure Project Acquired any Put-up anu Constrcuted □Documentation of
Plans infrastructure infrastructure infrastructure Infrastructure project
project through projects through projects aimed □Pictures of new
others self-initiative directly to improve constructed facilities
teaching and
Basic
learning process
Education
based on
Services
urgent.priority
needs
5.0% DRRM  DRRM Plans and PAPs Installed DRRM Practiced safety, Institutionalized □Emergency Kits
provisions resilience and DRRM best □Resilience Projects
precautionary practices and □DRRM PAPs and
measures acquired Accomplishements
emergency kits and
faciltities

4.0% School Beautification  Beautification Project Projected school Promoted learning Practiced positive  Positive learning
 Learner Support Facilities aesthetic factor or environment, learning climate, environment and child-
value thermal comfort clean and green, advocate PAPs
and appealing child protection  Learner Support and
ambiance and and child friendly Service Facilities
health and environment  Pictures of Beautification
sanitation positive learning
climate, clean and
green, child
protection and
child friendly
environment

Credit Points for 3.0% School Titling □School Site Delopment Registered title to Acquired Tax Secured School □Certificate of Title
Learning Environment Plan resgistry of deeds Declaration named Title to DepEd □Project OSLO Certificate
(Plus Points) to DepEd without problems □School Site Expansion
on heirs, squatting Project
or outsiders
25.0%
III. HUMAN
RESOURCE 15%
MANAGEMENT
2.0% Technical Assistance □Technical Assistance Provided technical Surpassed the Applied the □TAPs and Aps
AND Plan (TAP) Accomplishments,
assistance and targeted TAPs and learnings and
DEVELOPMENT Reports and Pictures
□Action Plans (Aps) conducted action completed Aps insights on TAPs
plans created proof of and Aps focused □Proof of teachers as
teachers as coach, on the coaches, mentors or
mentors or trainers improvement of tainers with pictures
teaching and
learning and
holistic develoment
of teachers

2.0% In-Service Activities  INSET Plans and Encouraged 20% Employed 40% of Engaged 60%of INSETs and Reports
(INSETs) and SLAC Activities of teachers to be teachers in district teachers to be  Certificate of
 GAD Plan involved in district or higher INSET involved in division Participation or
 SLAC Schedule Recognition
or higher INSET and surpassed of higher LAC or  SLAC Reports
and SLAC activities targeted SLAC INSET activities  GAD Project/Report
plans/activities with positive
results/outcomes

Basic 2.0% Managing □IPCRF of Teachers Completed the Conveyed results Committed  Summary of Ratings
Education Performance □PMCF evaluation of performance and teachers to have  Accomplished PMCF
Services Management □RPMS teachers IPCRF evaluated teachers an improved  RPMS Reports and
and portfolio IPCRF regularly performance to ger Pictorials
following 4 Phases an Oustanding  PBB Best School
rating
2.0% Creating Professional  PPST SAT Analysis *Encouraged Established Enjoined  PPST Needs Analysis and
Learning and  HRD or Learning and teachers to join professional stakeholders and Action Plans
Development (L&D) Development (L&D) professional learning support to partnership to  Teachers Professional
Plans
Community learning group address teachers support PAPs for Groups
*Analyzed PPST requests and teachers  MOA and MOU on
needs for teachers concerns. professionalism, teachers welfare and
and school officials *Conducted scholarship and development
learning and professional L&D personal growth  Established professional
development (L&D) and development L&D
based on PPST
Needs Analysis
and Action Plans

1.0% Incentives Welfare  Welfare and Benefits Checked pertinent Assisted teachers Helped teachers  Incentive or Benefits
and Benefits  PSIPOP papers of teachers get incentives like receive incentives Documentation
(i.e. salary, plantilla scholarship, other through monetary  Cooperative Reports
item, bonus, etc. ) welfare and assistance and  Processed Papers
benefits from arranged teachers
stakeholders welfare and
(i.e. salary, plantilla scholarship, other through monetary  Cooperative Reports
item, bonus, etc. ) welfare and assistance and  Processed Papers
benefits from arranged teachers
stakeholders welfare and
benefits in any
form.

Credit Points for 2.0% Exposure, Rewards  Designation Order Recognized efforts Guided school Honed teachers to  Recognition Program
Human Resource and Recognitions  Rewards and Initiatives of school officials officials or teachers get awards or  Certificate of Recognition
Management and  Recognition Program through awards or to receive awards recognition and  Memo of the Search
Development (Plus development or exposure for exposure which is  Professional/Personal
Points) program personal and institutionalized for Development Programs
professional their personal or
development professional growth
and development

3.0% Education and  201 File Motivated 25% of Assisted 50% of Facilitated 25% of  List of Teachers’
Promotion  Summary of Teachers Teachers to pursue Teachers in teachers to have Educational Attainment
Information graduate studies pursuing graduate finished graduate  TORs and Diploma of
Teachers
and apply for studies and in studies and helped  Appointment of
promotion applying for get promotion or Promoted Personnel
promotion reclassification
1.0% Conflict Management □Rubrics on Conflict *Provided *Addresed *Resolved internal □Feedback Mechanism
and Feedback Resolution feedback or negative feedbacks and external Documentation
System □Feedback system suggestion box conflicts □Certificate of Conflict
*No complaints or *No conflicts, *No administrative Resolution given by
conflicts but with complaints or DTxt case, complaints, immediate superior and
slight issues or malicious text or conflicts, malicious monitoring EPS
internal issues issues and Dtext
15.0%

Basic IV. PARENTS 15%


Education INVOLVEMENT
Services AND COMMUNITY 3.0% Parents Involvement  FPTA PAPs PAPs PAPs PAPs  PAPs Documentation
PARTNERSHIP  Homeroom Class PAPs amounting to: amounting to: amounting to:  PAPs Certification
 Deed of Donation
PI- P26-50K PI- P51-75K PI- P76K  PTA Resolutions
PII- P51-75K PII- P76- and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P76- 100K PII- P101K  Financial Statements
100K PIII- P101- and above
P-IV- P101- 125K PIII- P126K
150K P-IV- P151- and above
3.0% Community  Social Mobilization PAPs PAPs PAPs  PAPs Documentation
Plan 200K P-IV- P250K
Partnership amounting to: amounting to: amounting
and above to:  PAPs Certification
 List of Stakeholders  Immersion Partnership
PI- P101- PI- P151- PI- P251K
150K 250K and above  Financial Reports
PII- P301- PII- P401- PII- P501K  Deed of Donation
400K 500K and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P501- PIII- P601- PIII- P751K  LGU or SEF or
600K 750K and above Stakeholders PAPs
150K 250K and above  Financial Reports
PII- P301- PII- P401- PII- P501K  Deed of Donation
400K 500K and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P501- PIII- P601- PIII- P751K  LGU or SEF or
600K 750K and above Stakeholders PAPs
P-IV- P501- P-IV- P701- P-IV- P1M and
4.0% Brigada Eskwela PAPs
700K PAPs
1MK PAPs
above  Brigada Eskwela
amounting to: amounting to: amounting to: Documentation
PI- P50K to PI- P76K to PI- P100K  Certificate or Plaque of
75K 99K to 199K Recognition
PII- P100 to PII- P151 to PII- P200 to  Won in the regional or
150K 199K 399K national competition
PIII- P150K PIII- P200K PIII- P400K
Credit Points for 5.0% Donations and  Income Generating PAPs PAPs PAPs  Adopt-A-School Program
Project to 199K to 399K to 799K
Parents Involvement Projects (not from amounting
P-IV- P250Kto:
to amounting
P-IV- P500Kto:
to amounting to:
P-IV- P800K to Documents
and Community LGU, SEF or MOOE)  Financial Reports PI-
499K P50-75K PI-
799K P76- PI-
1.2M P101K  PAPs Documentation
 Resolutions
Partnership (Plus PII- P76- 100K and above  PAPs Certification
Points) 100K PII- P101- PII- P201K  Financial Reports
PIII- P101- 199K and above  Deed of Donation
150K PIII- P151- PIII- P301K
15.0%
P-IV- P151- 299K and above
250K P-IV- P251- P-IV- P501K
Basic V. SCHOOL 20% 500K and above
Education LEADERSHIP,
Services MANAGEMENT I.A. School Performance Improvement
AND OPERATIONS 2.0% Access  SF 4 At least 3% At least 5% At least 7%  Community Mapping
 Performance Indicators increase. Or 3.0- increase. increase.  SF Form 2 and 4
last 5 years (Drop-Out, 4.99% Or 5.0-6.99% Or 7.0% and above (Improved Participation
Cohort Survival and Rate)
Completion Rate)
1.0% Efficiency At most 2% At most 4% Has 0 RP or more Performance Indicators with
decrease Or 0.01- decrease Or 2.01 – than 4%. Or 4.01 improved Drop-Out, Cohort
2.0 4.0 and above Survival and Completion Rate
with Supporting Document

3.0% SBM Level of  SBM Level of Performance SBM Level I SBM Level II SBM Level III  SBM Level III of Practice
Practice Certificate Certificate
2.0% Educational Planning  eSIP Involved and Implemented and Institutionalized  AIP Quarterly Report
 AIP and APP reported school outdid the specified strategic planning based on SMEPA
Basic  School Planning and plans and targets plans in eSIP for and accomplishing  School Report Card
Education Quality Assurance Team to school and the current school plans with focused  SOSA
Services stakeholders year on DepEd VMO  Implemented APP
based on school  Accomplishment Report
priority needs  Data Mapping Tool

2.0% Records □e-BEIS/LIS *Updated School *Utilized IT system *Unified personnel  Validated Government
Management □Inventory Report Forms, eBEIS, LIS and updated on organized and School Program
and pertinent reports on systematic  Compilation of Memo
Receipts, Index and
records accurately with reporting on time School Inventory
*Conducted reporoduction and accurately with  Inspection r
2.0% Records *Updated School *Utilized IT system *Unified personnel  Validated Government
Management Forms, eBEIS, LIS and updated on organized and School Program
and pertinent reports on systematic  Compilation of Memo
Receipts, Index and
records accurately with reporting on time School Inventory
*Conducted reporoduction and accurately with  Inspection r
physical inventorymaterials and reproduction
supplies materials and
supplies
2.0% MOOE Liquidation  Work Financial Plan Recorded MOOE Reported MOOE *Revitalized 100%  Certified No AOM, ND or
 Liquidation Report liquidation and liquidation and MOOE properly NS from COA
 CDR financial reports without late and judiciously  Implemented and
 Bank Account
with accuracy submission *No AOM from completed Work Financial
*Put-up additional COA Plans
PAPs from MOOE *All WFP targets  Certificate of Good
have been Liquidator
implemented and
reported to
stakeholders

2.0% Management of  Canteen Funds Updated other Posted or Reported other  Picture of Transparency
Other School Funds  Other Funds financial records published financial funds to school Board
 Transparency Board Transparency work and other and stakeholders  Records of Other School-
Board school funds in who are entrusted Managed Funds/Financial
SRC or with authority, Aids
Transparency responsibility and
Board accountability

2.0% Monitoring and  SMEPA Conducted SMEPA Completed SMEPA Complied results of  SMEPA Report
Evaluation  M&E Program and performance and school-initiated M&E with greater  Results of M&E Program
target M&E programs impact on teaching  Accomplished
accomplishment and learning and Performance Targets
administrative
services
2.0% Abeyance to DepED  No Collection Policy Following DepED Adhered to no Strictly  Certificate or Mechanism
Orders and  Child Protection Policy policy with DepED policy adhered to no of No Collection Policy
Memorandum activities (selective: with DepED policy  Resolutions
enrolment, such as  Deed of Donations or
resolution
absolute no
graduation, (selective: Financial Aid
collection
classroom or enrolment, (enrolment,
school level) graduation, graduation,
classroom or classroom and
Credit Points for 1.0% Use of Technology in  Computer and Printer in Utilized computer United
school information
level) Updated IT and
school level)  ICT and reproduction
School Leadership, SMO the Office in preparing and and media
but w/ less literacy media literacy
but still withand equipment
Management and  Social Media application recording reports and improved to
equipment equipment to
impact  Social Media System
Operations (Plus and support school facilitate  Pictures of Office Solutions
outputs
Points) communication. operations liquidation, & Upgrade
recording, student
1.0% WOW Factor  P1M project *Received high- *Acquired extra- *Put-up innovative  PAPs documentation
tracking and
 Winnings or Participation end facility or P1M ordinary project project (something  Certificate of Merit or
operations
Basic in recognized activities project amounting to P1M new and never Participation
Education *Champion in the *Champion in the been seen PAPs)  MOA/MOU of Sustainable
Services regional citations national citations *Won/Participated Support
in the International  Picture of the WOW
Credit Points for
School Leadership,
Management and
Operations (Plus
Points)
1.0% WOW Factor  P1M project *Received high- *Acquired extra- *Put-up innovative  PAPs documentation
 Winnings or Participation end facility or P1M ordinary project project (something  Certificate of Merit or
Basic in recognized activities project amounting to P1M new and never Participation
Education *Champion in the *Champion in the been seen PAPs)  MOA/MOU of Sustainable
Services regional citations national citations *Won/Participated Support
in the International  Picture of the WOW
activities

20.0%

PLUS FACTOR 5.0%

5.0% Other Performed  Memo of the PAPs or *Acted as chair, *Served as chair, *Performed more  Output of the PAP
Functions and INSETs or Organizations judge or facilitator evaluator, trainer or than as writer,  Certificate of Recognition
Services  Program and Invitation in INSET or PAPs member of TWG validator, evaluator  Picture of the event
or professional in INSETs, PAPs or or coordinator or  ID orl Membership Oath of
clubs or 1 or more clubs in SDO or 3 chair of SDO or Office
coordinatorship or more other agency PAPs
within the district or coordinatorship in or regional
municipality the district or professional club
higher office

5.0%
Very Satisfactory

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ARCELI E. INTERIOR ERICSON S. SABACAN, Ph.D. RONALDO A. POZON, Ph.D., C
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintende
Rater Approving Authority
he Philippines page 1
of Education
on III
Nueva Ecija
IONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Antonio, Nueva Ecija

OPCRF) - RPMS PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR SY 2018-2019

ACTUAL RESULTS

Rating Score

4.5 0.900

4.5 0.090

4.5 0.135

4.5 0.09
4.5 0.090

page 2
4.5 0.09

4.5 0.09

4.5 0.135

4.5 0.09

4.5 0.09

40.5 0.900

4.5 1.125

4.5 0.135
4.5 0.225

4.5 0.225

page 3

4.5 0.225

4.5 0.180

4.5 0.030

27 1.02
4.5 0.675
4.5 0.090

4.5 0.090

4.5 0.09 page 4

4.5 0.090

4.5 0.045
4.5 0.090

4.5 0.135

4.5 0.045

36 0.675
page 5
4.925 0.739

4.9 0.147

4.9 0.147
5 0.200

4.9 0.245

19.7 0.739

4.2 0.83

4.5 0.09

4.5 0.045

5 0.150

4.5 0.090

p6

4.5 0.090
4.5 0.090

4.9 0.098

4.5 0.090

4.5 0.090

4.5 0.090

4.5 0.045

0 0.0
0 0.0

45.9 0.878

4.5 0.225

4.5 0.225

4.5 0.225
Very Satisfactory 4.498

RONALDO A. POZON, Ph.D., CESO V


Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region III
Division of Nueva Ecija
SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
San Francisco, San Antonio, Nueva Ecija

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) - RPMS PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR SY 2018-2019
Name of Employee: ARCELI E. INTERIOR Name of Rater: ERICSON S. SABACAN, Ph.D.
Position: Principal IV Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
School: SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Division: NUEVA ECIJA

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING ACTUAL RESULTS


Weight Basic Means of Performance Indicators Midyear Year End
Specific Targets Evident Exceeded Exemplified Superb Means
MFOs KRAs per Evaluation Evaluation
and Performace Verification
KRA 4.5 4.9 5 of Verification Date: Date:
Basic 1. INSTRUCTIONAL
20%
Education LEADERSHIP
Services Instructional 2.0% Performed  Instructional Implemented the Achieved all the Accomplished □Performance Targets
Supervision instructional Supervisory Plan (ISP) activities stated in targets and plans more than □Gantt Chart
supervision to the ISP indicated in the ISP expected targets in □ISP and Supporting
achieve learning the ISP with
outcomes at least 2 improved learners
teachers per week performance
3.0% Checked  Schedule of Checking of Noted and visited Inspected and Addressed DLP □Enrichment Activities
DLLs/Lesson Plans DLLs/DLPs DLLs/DLPs of all corrected concerns and □Summary of DLL/DLP
once a week to teachers inconsistencies in provided Reflection Records
address DLP DLLs/DLPs enrichment of the
concerns and to regularly DLL reflections of
provide enrichment of teachers
the DLL reflections of
teachers

2.0% Performed class □Class Observation Tool Completed Utilized COT and Improved teaching □COT and STAR Records
observation to at required number of STAR Observation & learning process or Summary
least 2 teachers per COT religiously and through provision □Pictures and reports of
week to improved exceeded the of technical demo teaching or class
teaching and learning number of required assistance, demo observation
process through observations teaching and
□Coaching and mentoring
provision of technical constant coaching
assistance and and mentoring
constant coaching
teaching and learning number of required assistance, demo
process through observations teaching and
provision of technical constant coaching
assistance and and mentoring records
constant coaching
and mentoring

2.0% Holistic Assessment □Holistic Assessment Provided teachers Conducted Holistic Raised the □Development programs
Tool and Activities with different Assessment status of based on assessment
□Test Results Holistic religiously targeting assessment results
Assessment various learners through skills
development, □Pictures of Holistic
activities assessment activities
exhibits or
recitals with
Basic 2.0% Intervention □Intervention Program Supervised Conducted needs and
Initiated  Innovation or
intervention or skill strengths or Intervention Program
Education Programs remedial class intervention or
Services programs for or development
special skills
innovation which with supporting
documents
specific learners programs resulted to greater
impact
Credit Points for 2.0% Learning Resources  Learning Resource Adopted and Initiated Developed and  New multimedia and
Instructional Development Materials improved development of utilized localized or printed materials
Supervision curriculum curriculum contextualized  Instructional Materials
materials or materials and curriculum  Localized Materials
activities activities materials and  Technology Devices
activities based on
learners’ needs

3.0% Curriculum  Curriculum Offerings Enriched *Utilized enriched Supported special  Approved Special
Enrichment  Curriculum Materials classroom level curriculum curriculum (SPA, Curriculum or Offerings
activities materials ICT, SHS tracks)  Enriched curriculum
*Applying for and growing based learning materials
special curriculum on urgency and
local needs
2.0% Best Practices  Best Practices in Adapted best Practiced best for Institutionalized  Pictures of Application
Curriculum practices from practices for Best practice  Best Practices
benchmarking learners needs and addresses learning Documentation
skills deficiencies  Benchmarking
2.0% Winnings in Contest  Certificate of Participation Won in the district Won in the division Won in different  Certificate, Medal and
in co or co- academic and non- aspect in the Plaque of Recognition
curricular activities academic contest regional or national  Pictures of Winnings
competition
consistently
20.0%

II. LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT 25%

3.0% School Improvement □School Map Improved or with Ensured Established  WOW Structure
proposal to eradication of eye WOW structure, Documentation
□Modernization Program  Pictures of Improved
improve Eye Sore sore and wow facilities and
School Facilities
feature or structure modernization
projedt with high
3.0% School Improvement Improved or with Ensured Established  WOW Structure
proposal to eradication of eye WOW structure, Documentation
improve Eye Sore sore and wow facilities and  Pictures of Improved
School Facilities
feature or structure modernization
projedt with high
social & academic
expectations to
everybody

5.0% Classroom  Pictures of all Classroom Maintained/ Improved and Developed  Pictures of 75%
Improvement and project Painted/Repaired restrcutured classroom facilties Improved Classroom
classrooms classrooms and acquired Fixtures or Facilities
 Acquired 1 project per
equipment for classroom
conducive teaching
and learning
5.0% Infrastructure Project □ Infrastructure Project Acquired any Put-up anu Constrcuted □Documentation of
Plans infrastructure infrastructure infrastructure Infrastructure project
project through projects through projects aimed □Pictures of new
others self-initiative directly to improve constructed facilities
teaching and
Basic
learning process
Education
based on
Services
urgent.priority
needs
5.0% DRRM  DRRM Plans and PAPs Installed DRRM Practiced safety, Institutionalized □Emergency Kits
provisions resilience and DRRM best □Resilience Projects
precautionary practices and □DRRM PAPs and
measures acquired Accomplishements
emergency kits and
faciltities

4.0% School Beautification  Beautification Project Projected school Promoted learning Practiced positive  Positive learning
 Learner Support Facilities aesthetic factor or environment, learning climate, environment and child-
value thermal comfort clean and green, advocate PAPs
and appealing child protection  Learner Support and
ambiance and and child friendly Service Facilities
health and environment  Pictures of Beautification
sanitation positive learning
climate, clean and
green, child
protection and
child friendly
environment

Credit Points for 3.0% School Titling □School Site Delopment Registered title to Acquired Tax Secured School □Certificate of Title
Learning Environment Plan resgistry of deeds Declaration named Title to DepEd □Project OSLO Certificate
(Plus Points) to DepEd without problems □School Site Expansion
on heirs, squatting Project
or outsiders
Learning Environment Plan resgistry of deeds Declaration named Title to DepEd
(Plus Points) to DepEd without problems
on heirs, squatting
or outsiders
25.0%

III. HUMAN
RESOURCE 15%
MANAGEMENT
2.0% Technical Assistance □Technical Assistance Provided technical Surpassed the Applied the □TAPs and Aps
AND Plan (TAP) Accomplishments,
assistance and targeted TAPs and learnings and
DEVELOPMENT Reports and Pictures
□Action Plans (Aps) conducted action completed Aps insights on TAPs
plans created proof of and Aps focused □Proof of teachers as
teachers as coach, on the coaches, mentors or
mentors or trainers improvement of tainers with pictures
teaching and
learning and
holistic develoment
of teachers

2.0% In-Service Activities  INSET Plans and Encouraged 20% Employed 40% of Engaged 60%of INSETs and Reports
(INSETs) and SLAC Activities of teachers to be teachers in district teachers to be  Certificate of
 GAD Plan involved in district or higher INSET involved in division Participation or
 SLAC Schedule Recognition
or higher INSET and surpassed of higher LAC or  SLAC Reports
and SLAC activities targeted SLAC INSET activities  GAD Project/Report
plans/activities with positive
results/outcomes

Basic 2.0% Managing □IPCRF of Teachers Completed the Conveyed results Committed  Summary of Ratings
Education Performance □PMCF evaluation of performance and teachers to have  Accomplished PMCF
Services Management □RPMS teachers IPCRF evaluated teachers an improved  RPMS Reports and
and portfolio IPCRF regularly performance to ger Pictorials
following 4 Phases an Oustanding  PBB Best School
rating
2.0% Creating Professional  PPST SAT Analysis *Encouraged Established Enjoined  PPST Needs Analysis and
Learning and  HRD or Learning and teachers to join professional stakeholders and Action Plans
Development (L&D) Development (L&D) professional learning support to partnership to  Teachers Professional
Plans
Community learning group address teachers support PAPs for Groups
*Analyzed PPST requests and teachers  MOA and MOU on
needs for teachers concerns. professionalism, teachers welfare and
and school officials *Conducted scholarship and development
learning and professional L&D personal growth  Established professional
development (L&D) and development L&D
based on PPST
Needs Analysis
and Action Plans

1.0% Incentives Welfare  Welfare and Benefits Checked pertinent Assisted teachers Helped teachers  Incentive or Benefits
and Benefits  PSIPOP papers of teachers get incentives like receive incentives Documentation
(i.e. salary, plantilla scholarship, other through monetary  Cooperative Reports
1.0% Incentives Welfare  Welfare and Benefits Checked pertinent Assisted teachers Helped teachers  Incentive or Benefits
and Benefits  PSIPOP papers of teachers get incentives like receive incentives Documentation
(i.e. salary, plantilla scholarship, other through monetary  Cooperative Reports
item, bonus, etc. ) welfare and assistance and  Processed Papers
benefits from arranged teachers
stakeholders welfare and
benefits in any
form.

Credit Points for 2.0% Exposure, Rewards  Designation Order Recognized efforts Guided school Honed teachers to  Recognition Program
Human Resource and Recognitions  Rewards and Initiatives of school officials officials or teachers get awards or  Certificate of Recognition
Management and  Recognition Program through awards or to receive awards recognition and  Memo of the Search
Development (Plus development or exposure for exposure which is  Professional/Personal
Points) program personal and institutionalized for Development Programs
professional their personal or
development professional growth
and development

3.0% Education and  201 File Motivated 25% of Assisted 50% of Facilitated 25% of  List of Teachers’
Promotion  Summary of Teachers Teachers to pursue Teachers in teachers to have Educational Attainment
Information graduate studies pursuing graduate finished graduate  TORs and Diploma of
Teachers
and apply for studies and in studies and helped  Appointment of
promotion applying for get promotion or Promoted Personnel
promotion reclassification
1.0% Conflict Management □Rubrics on Conflict *Provided *Addresed *Resolved internal □Feedback Mechanism
and Feedback Resolution feedback or negative feedbacks and external Documentation
System □Feedback system suggestion box conflicts □Certificate of Conflict
*No complaints or *No conflicts, *No administrative Resolution given by
conflicts but with complaints or DTxt case, complaints, immediate superior and
slight issues or malicious text or conflicts, malicious monitoring EPS
internal issues issues and Dtext
15.0%

Basic IV. PARENTS 15%


Education INVOLVEMENT
Services AND COMMUNITY 3.0% Parents Involvement  FPTA PAPs PAPs PAPs PAPs  PAPs Documentation
PARTNERSHIP  Homeroom Class PAPs amounting to: amounting to: amounting to:  PAPs Certification
 Deed of Donation
PI- P26-50K PI- P51-75K PI- P76K  PTA Resolutions
PII- P51-75K PII- P76- and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P76- 100K PII- P101K  Financial Statements
100K PIII- P101- and above
P-IV- P101- 125K PIII- P126K
150K P-IV- P151- and above
3.0% Community  Social Mobilization PAPs PAPs PAPs  PAPs Documentation
Plan 200K P-IV- P250K
Partnership amounting to: amounting to: amounting
and above to:  PAPs Certification
 List of Stakeholders  Immersion Partnership
PI- P101- PI- P151- PI- P251K
150K 250K and above  Financial Reports
3.0% Community  Social Mobilization PAPs PAPs PAPs  PAPs Documentation
Partnership Plan amounting to: amounting to: amounting to:  PAPs Certification
 List of Stakeholders
PI- P101- PI- P151- PI- P251K  Immersion Partnership
150K 250K and above  Financial Reports
PII- P301- PII- P401- PII- P501K  Deed of Donation
400K 500K and above  Pictures of PAPs
PIII- P501- PIII- P601- PIII- P751K  LGU or SEF or
600K 750K and above Stakeholders PAPs
P-IV- P501- P-IV- P701- P-IV- P1M and
4.0% Brigada Eskwela PAPs
700K PAPs
1MK PAPs
above  Brigada Eskwela
amounting to: amounting to: amounting to: Documentation
PI- P50K to PI- P76K to PI- P100K  Certificate or Plaque of
75K 99K to 199K Recognition
PII- P100 to PII- P151 to PII- P200 to  Won in the regional or
150K 199K 399K national competition
PIII- P150K PIII- P200K PIII- P400K
Credit Points for 5.0% Donations and  Income Generating PAPs PAPs PAPs  Adopt-A-School Program
Project to 199K to 399K to 799K
Parents Involvement Projects (not from amounting
P-IV- P250Kto:
to amounting
P-IV- P500Kto:
to P-IV- P800K to Documents
amounting to:
and Community LGU, SEF or MOOE)  Financial Reports PI-
499K P50-75K PI-
799K P76- PI-
1.2M P101K  PAPs Documentation
 Resolutions
Partnership (Plus PII- P76- 100K and above  PAPs Certification
Points) 100K PII- P101- PII- P201K  Financial Reports
PIII- P101- 199K and above  Deed of Donation
150K PIII- P151- PIII- P301K
15.0%
P-IV- P151- 299K and above
250K P-IV- P251- P-IV- P501K
Basic V. SCHOOL 20% 500K and above
Education LEADERSHIP,
Services MANAGEMENT I.A. School Performance Improvement
AND OPERATIONS 2.0% Access  SF 4 At least 3% At least 5% At least 7%  Community Mapping
 Performance Indicators increase. Or 3.0- increase. increase.  SF Form 2 and 4
last 5 years (Drop-Out, 4.99% Or 5.0-6.99% Or 7.0% and above (Improved Participation
Cohort Survival and Rate)
Completion Rate)
1.0% Efficiency At most 2% At most 4% Has 0 RP or more Performance Indicators with
decrease Or 0.01- decrease Or 2.01 – than 4%. Or 4.01 improved Drop-Out, Cohort
2.0 4.0 and above Survival and Completion Rate
with Supporting Document

3.0% SBM Level of  SBM Level of Performance SBM Level I SBM Level II SBM Level III  SBM Level III of Practice
Practice Certificate Certificate
2.0% Educational Planning  eSIP Involved and Implemented and Institutionalized  AIP Quarterly Report
 AIP and APP reported school outdid the specified strategic planning based on SMEPA
Basic  School Planning and plans and targets plans in eSIP for and accomplishing  School Report Card
Education Quality Assurance Team to school and the current school plans with focused  SOSA
Services stakeholders year on DepEd VMO  Implemented APP
based on school  Accomplishment Report
priority needs  Data Mapping Tool
2.0% Records □e-BEIS/LIS *Updated School *Utilized IT system *Unified personnel  Validated Government
Management □Inventory Report Forms, eBEIS, LIS and updated on organized and School Program
and pertinent reports on systematic  Compilation of Memo
Receipts, Index and
records accurately with reporting on time School Inventory
*Conducted reporoduction and accurately with  Inspection r
physical inventorymaterials and reproduction
supplies materials and
supplies
2.0% MOOE Liquidation  Work Financial Plan Recorded MOOE Reported MOOE *Revitalized 100%  Certified No AOM, ND or
 Liquidation Report liquidation and liquidation and MOOE properly NS from COA
 CDR financial reports without late and judiciously  Implemented and
 Bank Account
with accuracy submission *No AOM from completed Work Financial
*Put-up additional COA Plans
PAPs from MOOE *All WFP targets  Certificate of Good
have been Liquidator
implemented and
reported to
stakeholders

2.0% Management of  Canteen Funds Updated other Posted or Reported other  Picture of Transparency
Other School Funds  Other Funds financial records published financial funds to school Board
 Transparency Board Transparency work and other and stakeholders  Records of Other School-
Board school funds in who are entrusted Managed Funds/Financial
SRC or with authority, Aids
Transparency responsibility and
Board accountability

2.0% Monitoring and  SMEPA Conducted SMEPA Completed SMEPA Complied results of  SMEPA Report
Evaluation  M&E Program and performance and school-initiated M&E with greater  Results of M&E Program
target M&E programs impact on teaching  Accomplished
accomplishment and learning and Performance Targets
administrative
services
2.0% Abeyance to DepED  No Collection Policy Following DepED Adhered to no Strictly  Certificate or Mechanism
Orders and  Child Protection Policy policy with DepED policy adhered to no of No Collection Policy
Memorandum activities (selective: with DepED policy  Resolutions
enrolment, such as  Deed of Donations or
resolution
absolute no
graduation, (selective: Financial Aid
collection
classroom or enrolment, (enrolment,
school level) graduation, graduation,
classroom or classroom and
Credit Points for 1.0% Use of Technology in  Computer and Printer in Utilized computer United
school information
level) Updated IT and
school level)  ICT and reproduction
School Leadership, SMO the Office in preparing and and media
but w/ less literacy media
but still withand
literacy equipment
Management and  Social Media application recording reports and improved to
equipment equipment
impact to  Social Media System
Operations (Plus and support school facilitate  Pictures of Office Solutions
outputs
Points) communication. operations liquidation, & Upgrade
recording, student
tracking and
operations
Credit Points for
School Leadership,
Management and
Operations (Plus
Points)
1.0% WOW Factor  P1M project *Received high- *Acquired extra- *Put-up innovative  PAPs documentation
 Winnings or Participation end facility or P1M ordinary project project (something  Certificate of Merit or
Basic in recognized activities project amounting to P1M new and never Participation
Education *Champion in the *Champion in the been seen PAPs)  MOA/MOU of Sustainable
Services regional citations national citations *Won/Participated Support
in the International  Picture of the WOW
activities

20.0%

PLUS FACTOR 5.0%

5.0% Other Performed  Memo of the PAPs or *Acted as chair, *Served as chair, *Performed more  Output of the PAP
Functions and INSETs or Organizations judge or facilitator evaluator, trainer or than as writer,  Certificate of Recognition
Services  Program and Invitation in INSET or PAPs member of TWG validator, evaluator  Picture of the event
or professional in INSETs, PAPs or or coordinator or  ID orl Membership Oath of
clubs or 1 or more clubs in SDO or 3 chair of SDO or Office
coordinatorship or more other agency PAPs
within the district or coordinatorship in or regional
municipality the district or professional club
higher office

5.0%
Outstanding

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory ARCELI E. INTERIOR ERICSON S. SABACAN, Ph.D. RONALDO A. POZON, Ph.D., C
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintende
Rater Approving Authority
he Philippines page 1
of Education
on III
Nueva Ecija
IONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Antonio, Nueva Ecija

OPCRF) - RPMS PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR SY 2018-2019


ERICSON S. SABACAN, Ph.D.
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

ACTUAL RESULTS

Rating Score

4.82222 0.964

4.5 0.090

4.9 0.147

4.9 0.098
4.5 0.090

page 2
4.9 0.098

4.9 0.098

5 0.150

4.9 0.098

4.9 0.098

43.4 0.967

4.96667 1.242

4.9 0.147
4.9 0.147

5 0.250

5 0.250

page 3

4.9 0.245

5 0.200

5 0.150
29.8 1.242

4.725 0.709
4.5 0.090

4.9 0.098

4.9 0.098 page 4

4.5 0.090

4.5 0.045
4.5 0.045

5 0.100

5 0.15

4.5 0.045

37.8 0.716
page 5
4.825 0.724

4.9 0.147

4.5 0.135
4.5 0.135

5 0.200

4.9 0.245

19.3 0.727

4.8 0.95

4.5 0.09

4.5 0.045

5 0.150

5 0.100

p6
4.5 0.090

5 0.100

5 0.100

4.9 0.098

4.5 0.090

5 0.050
4.5 0.045

52.4 0.958

4.9 0.245

4.9 0.245

4.9 0.245
Outstanding 4.84

RONALDO A. POZON, Ph.D., CESO V


Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING


Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality
Services Knowledge and knowledge of
Pedagogy content within Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
and across of content and its of content and its of content and its
curriculum integration within integration within integration within
teaching areas. and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used different Used different
Services Knowledge and range of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
skills. 7.5%
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality
Services Environment classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
and Diversity of structure to management management management
Learners engage learners, strategies that strategies that strategies that
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
discovery and Efficiency
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments.
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Services learner behavior management management management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4


of the given of the given of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2
4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
gender, needs, rating of 6
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2


least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied
7.5%
teaching and teaching and
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied
7.5%
teaching and teaching and
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources,
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied


varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner
achievement progress and progress and progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and
clearly the clear communication of clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a


combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services various related performed various performed various performed various
works/activities related related related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF
below 1.499 Poor Ratee R
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

ING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
evidence was
Showed knowledge shown
of content and its
integration within
and across subject
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4
Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
the given MOV evidence was
shown

Facilitated using No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


different teaching evidence was
strategies that shown
promote reading
writing and/or
numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
learner-centered evidence was
lessons as shown
evidently shown in
any of the other
given MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Used different No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
teaching strategies evidence was
that develop critical shown
and creative
thinking skills
and/or other HOTS
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
and/or other HOTS
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


as evidenced by evidence was
any of the other shown
given MOV

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


Used classroom evidence was
management shown
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV

Applied teacher No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


management evidence was
strategies of learner shown
behavior that
promote positive
and non-violent
discipline as shown
in MOV submitted
with a rating of 4

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the given strategies evidence was
as observed in only shown
1 lesson

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Applied No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
differentiated evidence was
teaching strategies shown
to address learner
diversity as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Submitted any 1 No acceptable


differentiated evidence was
teaching strategy in shown
only 1 lesson as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Planned and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
implemented evidence was
developmentally shown
sequenced
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally evidence was
sequenced shown
teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely participated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
meeting to discuss shown
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Participated in 1 No acceptable
LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
as evidently shown shown
in any 1 of the
given MOV

Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


used varied evidence was
teaching and shown
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted any No acceptable


teaching and evidence was
Submitted any No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource, shown
including ICT, as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Designed, selected, No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
organized and used evidence was
diagnostic, shown
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely monitored No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


and evaluated evidence was
learner progress shown
and achievement
using learner
attainment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable


was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely showed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
prompt and clear evidence was
communication of shown
the learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the given MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable


was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown
Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
various related evidence was
work/activities that shown
contribute to the
teaching learning
process as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight Numerical R
Weight per
KRA Objectives per
KRA Q
Objective
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER


Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ent Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) - RPMS FOR SY 2019-2020
Name of Employee: JUAN D. MASIPAG Name of Rater: WANNA PACENCIA
Position: School Principal I Position: Education Program Supervisor
School: MASIGASIG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Mid-Year Review: Date of Final Evaluation:
Division: NUEVA ECIJA

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING ACTUAL RESULTS


KRAs/ Weight Performance Indicators
Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Rating
Evaluation Evaluation
Objectives KRA 4 4.5 5
Basic 1. INSTRUCTIONAL 20%
Education LEADERSHIP
Services 1.A Instructional 1. Instructional Supervision Implemented the Achieved all the targets Accomplished more than
Supervision activities stated in the and plans indicated in expected targets in the
* Performed * To supervise 15 teachers a month for major ISP the ISP ISP with improved
instructional learning areas. Analyze activities performed learners performance
supervision to achieve by the teacher supervised and formulate
learning outcomes at needed intervention
least 3 teachers per
week

2. Checking of DLLs/Lesson Plans Noted and visited Inspected and Addressed DLP
DLLs/DLPs of all corrected concerns and provided
*To check and visit DLLs/DLPs of all 46 JHS teachers inconsistencies in enrichment of the DLL
and 12 SHS teachers and address DLP DLLs/DLPs regularly reflections of teachers
concerns and provided enrichment of the DLL
reflections of teachers

3. Class Observation Completed required Utilized COT and STAR Improved teaching &
*To provide technical assistance to 46 JHS number of COT Observation religiously learning process through
and 12 SHS teachers on matters pertaining to and exceeded the provision of technical
enhancement of classroom management, number of required assistance, demo
skills and instructional competence through observations teaching and constant
coaching and mentoring
Completed required Utilized COT and STAR Improved teaching &
*To provide technical assistance to 46 JHS number of COT Observation religiously learning process through
and 12 SHS teachers on matters pertaining to and exceeded the provision of technical
enhancement of classroom management, number of required assistance, demo
skills and instructional competence through observations teaching and constant
class observation and constant mentoring coaching and mentoring
and coaching

KRAs/ Weight Performance Indicators


Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating
Evaluation Evaluation
Objectives KRA 4 4.5 5
4. Learning Resources Development Adopted and improved Initiated development Developed and utilized
curriculum materials or of curriculum materials localized or
*To encourage teachers developed and activities and activities contextualized
utilized localized or contextualized curriculum curriculum materials and
materials and activties based on learners' activties based on
needs with at least 75% success learners' needs

5. Holistic Assessment Provided teachers with Conducted Holistic Raised the status of
To raise the status of assessment through different Holistic Assessment religiously assessment through
skills development, exhibits or recitals with Assessment activities targeting various skills development,
needs and strengths or special skills with at learners exhibits or recitals with
least 75% success needs and strengths or
special skills
6. Curriclum Enrichment Enriched classroom *Utilized enriched Supported special
*To support special curriculum (SPA, ICT, level activities curriculum materials curriculum (SPA, ICT,
SHS tracks) and growing based on urgency *Applying for special SHS tracks) and
and local needs curriculum growing based on
urgency and local needs
7. Intervention Programs / Best Practices Supervised remedial Conducted intervention Initiated intervention,
class programs for or skill or development innovation or research
*To initiate intervention, innovation or specific learners or programs to various which resulted to greater
research which resulted to greater impact or adapted best practices learners needs and skills impact or best practices
best practices addressing deficiencies with at addressing deficiencies
least 75% success

Basic II. LEARNING 20%


Education ENVIRONMENT:
Services * Provide safe 8. School Improvement Improved Eye Sore Ensured eradication of Established WOW
and child friendly *To establish WOW structure, facilities and eye sore and wow structure, facilities and
learning and school modernization projedt with high social & feature or structure modernization projedt
environmen for academic expectations to everybody with with high social &
students/learners 75% success academic expectations
to everybody
learning and school modernization projedt with high social & feature or structure modernization projedt
environmen for academic expectations to everybody with with high social &
students/learners 75% success academic expectations
to everybody

9. Classroom Improvement Maintained/Painted/Rep Improved and Developed classroom


aired classrooms restrcutured classrooms facilties and acquired
*To develop classroom facilties and acquired equipment for conducive
equipment for conducive teaching and teaching and learning
learning with at least 75% success

10. Infrastructure Project Acquired any Put-up anu infrastructure Constrcuted


*To constrcut infrastructure projects aimed infrastructure project projects through self- infrastructure projects
directly to improve teaching and learning through others initiative aimed directly to
process based on urgent priority needs with improve teaching and
at least 75% success learning process based
on urgent priority needs
KRAs/ Weight Performance Indicators
Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating
Evaluation Evaluation
Objectives KRA 4 4.5 5
11. DRRM Installed DRRM Practiced safety, Institutionalized DRRM
*To institutionalize DRRM best practices and provisions resilience and best practices and
acquired emergency kits and faciltities with at precautionary measures acquired emergency kits
least 75% success and faciltities

12. School Titling Registered title to Acquired Tax Secured School Title to
*To register title to resgistry of deeds and resgistry of deeds Declaration named to DepEd without problems
acquired Tax Declaration named to DpeEd- DepEd on heirs, squatting or
SFNHS with 75% success outsiders

13. School Beautification Projected school Promoted learning Practiced positive


*To practice positive learning climate, clean aesthetic factor or value environment, thermal learning climate, clean
and green, child protection and child friendly comfort and appealing and green, child
environment withb at least 75% success ambiance and health protection and child
and sanitation friendly environment

Basic III. HUMAN 20%


Education RESOURCE
Services MANAGEMENT
14. Technical Assistance Provided technical Surpassed the targeted Applied the learnings
AND
*To apply the learnings and insights on TAPs assistance and TAPs and completed and insights on TAPs
DEVELOPMENT:
and Aps focused on the improvement of conducted action plans Aps created proof of and Aps focused on the
* To provide
teaching and learning and holistic develoment teachers as coach, improvement of teaching
technical assistance
of teachers with at least 75% success mentors or trainers and learning and holistic
to 46 JHS and 12
develoment of teachers
SHS teachers on
matters pertaining to
classroom
mangement, skills and
SHS teachers on
matters pertaining to
classroom 15. In-Service Activities (INSETs) and Encouraged 20% of Employed 40% of Engaged 60% of
mangement, skills and SLAC teachers to be involved teachers in district or teachers to be involved
teaching competence in district or higher higher INSET and in division of higher LAC
*To engaged 100% of teachers to be involved
and to 8 non teaching INSET and SLAC surpassed targeted or INSET activities with
in division of higher LAC or INSET activities
personnel for suport activities SLAC plans/activities positive results/
with positive results/outcomes
services within the outcomes
RPMS cycle
16. Managing Performance Management Completed the Conveyed results Committed teachers to
evaluation of teachers performance and have an improved
*To commit teachers to have an improved IPCRF and portfolio evaluated teachers performance to get an
performance to get an Oustanding rating with IPCRF regularly Oustanding rating
at least 75% success following 4 Phases
17. Conducting Professional Learning *Encouraged teschers to Established professional
Enjoined stakeholders
and Development (L&D) Community join professional learning support to
and partnnership to
learning group address teachers
support PAPs for
*To enjoin stakeholders and partnnership to requests and concerns
teachers
support PAPs for teachers professionalism, professionalism,
*Analyzed PPST needs
scholarship and personal growth and scholarship and
for teachers and school
development based on PPST Needs Analysis officials learning and *Conducted professional personal growth and
and Action Plans with at least 75% success development based on
development (L&D) L&D
PPST Needs Analysis
and Action Plans
KRAs/ Weight Performance Indicators
Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating
Evaluation Evaluation
Objectives KRA 4 4.5 5
18. Education and Promotion Motivated 25% of Assisted 50% of Facilitated 25% of
teachers to pursue Teachers in pursuing teachers to have
*To facilitate 25% of teachers to have finished graduate studies and graduate studies and in finished graduate
graduate studies and helped get promotion or apply for promotion applying for promotion studies and helped get
reclassification with at least 75% success promotion or
reclassification
19. Welfare, Benefits, Incentives and Recognized efforts of Supported school *Helped teachers to
Recognitions teachers and school officials or teachers facilitate and improve
officials through awards tonreceive awards or their welfare, benefits
*To help teachers to facilitate and improve or incentive program benefits or incentives and processing of
their welfare, benefits and processing of from higher office papers
papers *To provide teachers with
benefits or incentives *Provided teachers with
benefits or incentives
20. Conflict Management and Feedback *Provided feedback or *Addresed negative *Resolved internal and
System suggestion box feedbacks external conflicts
*To provide feedback or suggestion box
*To address negative *No complaints or *No conflicts, complaints *No administrative case,
feedbacks, complaints or conflicts with slight conflicts but with slight or DTxt or malicious text complaints, conflicts,
issues issues or internal issues malicious issues and
Dtext
*To provide feedback or suggestion box
*To address negative *No complaints or *No conflicts, complaints *No administrative case,
feedbacks, complaints or conflicts with slight conflicts but with slight or DTxt or malicious text complaints, conflicts,
issues issues or internal issues malicious issues and
Dtext
Basic IV. PARENTS 20%
Education INVOLVEMENT
Services AND COMMUNITY 21. Parents Involvement PAPs amounting to: PAPs amounting to: PAPs amounting to:
PARTNERSHIP * To establish school family and community P1- P51-100K P1- P101-150K P1- 151K & above
*To establish school partnership with 80% success P11- P151-200K P11- P201-250K P2- 251K & above
and community
P111- P251-300K P111- P301-350K P3- 351K & above
partnership for school
performance and P1V- P351-400K P1V- P401-500K P4- 501K & above
involvement in 22. Community Partnership PAPs amounting to: PAPs amounting to: PAPs amounting to:
community projects
*To organize programs/meetings with P1- P101-150K P1- P151-250K P1- 251K & above
stakeholders especially for academic and P301- P151-400K P11- P401-500K P2- 501K & above
other purposes (Strategic Planning) with at P111- P501-600K P111- P601-750K P3- 751K & above
leat 75% success P1V- P601-700K P1V- P701-1M P4- 1M & above

23. Brigada Eskwela Acquired Brigada Participated in Brigada Won in the regional or
*To actively particpate in the Brigada Eskwwela prescribed Eskwela Plus and won natuonal Brigada
Eskwela 2019 with at least 80% success amount of projects in the division Eskwela Contest

24. Donations and Projects (not from PAPs amounting to: PAPs amounting to: PAPs amounting to:
LGU, SEF or MOOE) P1- P50-75K P1- P76-100K P1- 101K & above
P11- P76-100K P11- P101-199K P2- 201K & above
*To complete school projects initiated by P111- P101-150K P111- P151-299K P3- 301K & above
parents and community stakeholders with at P1V- P151-250K P1V- P251-500K P4- 501K & above
least 75% success
KRAs/ Weight Performance Indicators
Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating
Evaluation Evaluation
Objectives KRA 4 4.5 5
Basic V. SCHOOL 20%
Education LEADERSHIP,
Services MANAGEMENT 25. Educational Planning Involved and reported Implemented and outdid Institutionalized strategic
AND OPERATIONS school plans and targets the specified plans in planning and
* To perform *To institutionalize strategic planning and to school and eSIP for the current accomplishing plans
school leadership, accomplishing plans with focused on DepEd stakeholders school year with focused on DepEd
management and VMO based on school priority needs with at VMO based on school
operations functions least 75% success priority needs

26. Records Management *Updated School Forms, *Utilized IT system and *Unified personnel on
eBEIS, LIS and pertinent updated reports on organized and
*To unify personnel on organized and records accurately with systematic reporting on
systematic reporting on time and accurately *Conducted physical reporoduction materials time and accurately with
with reproduction materials and supplies with inventory and supplies reproduction materials
*Updated School Forms, *Utilized IT system and *Unified personnel on
eBEIS, LIS and pertinent updated reports on organized and
*To unify personnel on organized and records accurately with systematic reporting on
systematic reporting on time and accurately *Conducted physical reporoduction materials time and accurately with
with reproduction materials and supplies with inventory and supplies reproduction materials
at least 75% success and supplies

27. MOOE Liquidation Recorded MOOE Reported MOOE *Revitalized 100%


*To revitalize 100% MOOE properly and liquidation and financial liquidation and without MOOE properly and
judiciously reports with accuracy late submission judiciously
*No AOM from COA
*Put-up additional PAPs *All WFP targets have
from MOOE been implemented and
reported to stakeholders

28. Management of Other School Funds Updated other financial Posted or published Reported other funds to
records Transparency financial work and other school and stakeholders
* To update financial records, posted in Board school funds in SRC or who are entrusted with
Transparency Board and report other funds to Transparency Board authority, responsibility
school and stakeholders who are entrusted and accountability
with authority, responsibility and
accountability
29. Monitoring and Evaluation Conducted SMEPA and Completed SMEPA and Complied results of M&E
performance target school-initiated M&E with greater impact on
*To conduct SMEPA and Performance accomplishment programs teaching and learning
Targets Accomplishments and comply results and administrative
of M&E with greater impact on teaching and services
learning and administrative services with at
least 75% success
30. Abeyance to DepED Orders and Following DepED policy Adhered to no Strictly adhered to
Memorandum with activities (selective:DepED policy no DepED policy
enrolment, graduation, with resolution such as absolute no
classroom or school collection
*To strictly adhere to no DepED policy such (selective:
(enrolment,
as absolute no collection (enrolment, level) enrolment, graduation,
graduation, classroom and school level) but graduation, classroom and
still with impact classroom or school level) but
school level) but still with impact
w/ less improved
KRAs/ Weight Performance
outputs Indicators
Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding Midyear Year End
MFOs per Specific Targets and Performace Rating
Evaluation Evaluation
Objectives KRA 4 4.5 5
31. Use of Technology in SMO Utilized computer in United information and Updated IT and media
preparing and recording media literacy and literacy and equipment
*To update ICT and media literacy and reports and equipment to support to facilitate liquidation,
equipment to facilitate liquidation, recording, communication. school operations recording, student
student tracking and operations with 75% tracking and operations
success
preparing and recording media literacy and literacy and equipment
*To update ICT and media literacy and reports and equipment to support to facilitate liquidation,
equipment to facilitate liquidation, recording, communication. school operations recording, student
student tracking and operations with 75% tracking and operations
success
Final Rating

CONFORME:

Date: ______________Phase I - Performance Planning and Commitment:


Ratee: Noted:
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING JUAN D. MASIPAG WANNA PASENCIA
4.500-5.000 Outstanding School Principal I Monitoring Supervisor
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory Date: ______________Phase II - Performance Monitoring and Coaching
below 1.499 Poor Ratee: Noted:

JUAN D. MASIPAG WANNA PASENCIA


School Principal I Monitoring Supervisor

Date: ______________Phase III - Performance Review and Evaluation (Mid-Year Review with
Ratee: Noted:

JUAN D. MASIPAG WANNA PASENCIA


School Principal I Monitoring Supervisor

________________________
Validator

FINAL AND YEAR-END EVALUATION:

Rater:

ERICSON S. SABACAN, Ed.D.


Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Approving Authority

RONALDO A. POZON, Ph.D., CESO V


Schools Division Superintendent
EVIEW FORM (OPCRF) - RPMS FOR SY 2019-2020
WANNA PACENCIA

ACTUAL RESULTS

Score
Score
Score
Score
Score
Score
WANNA PASENCIA
Monitoring Supervisor

WANNA PASENCIA
Monitoring Supervisor

Phase III - Performance Review and Evaluation (Mid-Year Review with SMEPA)

WANNA PASENCIA
Monitoring Supervisor
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight Numerica
Weight per
KRA Objectives per
KRA Q
Objective
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% Err:509
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER


Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 Err:509 Err:509
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Err:509 0.000 0.000
Final Rating Err:509
Adjectival Rating Err:509

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority

You might also like