Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Petitioner,
-versus-
Agrarian Case No. 211-AF
For: Just
Compensation
DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN
REFORM and LAND BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINES.
Respondents.
X----------------------------------------------X
AMENDED ANSWER
with
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
1
issuances relative to the computation of the
value of the subject landholding, thus it cannot
be gainsaid that the valuation arrived at by LBP is
unjust and unfair in the realm of agrarian reform;
For Uncultivated:
LV = (0.90 x ZVI) + (0.10 x MV)
= (0.90 x Php14,000.00) + (0.10 x
Php42,867.86)
= Php12,600.00 + Php4,286.79
= Php16,886.79/hectare
= Php16,886.79 x 8.5739 hectares
=Php144,785.65
2
property subject to agrarian reform. This
uniform system will ensure that they do not
arbitrarily fix an amount that is absurd,
baseless ad even contradictory to the
objectives of our agrarian reform laws as
just compensation. This system will
likewise ensure that the just compensation
fixed represents, at the very least, a close
approximation of the full and real value of
the property taken that is fair and
equitable for both the farmer-beneficiaries
and the landowner. (Ramon M. Alfonso
versus Land Bank of the Philippines and
Department of Agrarian Reform, G.R. Nos.
181912 and 183347, November 29, 2016)
3
11. The proceeding therein yielded a decision
originally favoring the herein petitioner. LBP filed
its Motion for Reconsideration of the decision
which was granted by the DARAB and thereby
affirming the valuation of LBP;
“Xxx
Xxx”
4
executory. The DISMISSAL of the instant petition
shall therefore be in order.
PRAYER
By:
Copy furnished:
5
The PARPO II
Department of Agrarian Reform,
Mabini, Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija
EXPLANATION
(Pursuant to Section 11, Rule 13 of the 1997 Rules of Civil
Procedure)