Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Energy Audit
Energy Audit is the key to a systematic approach for decision-making in the area
of energy management. It attempts to balance the total energy inputs with its use, and
serves to identify all the energy streams in a facility. It quantifies energy usage according
to its discrete functions. Industrial energy audit is an effective tool in defining and
pursuing comprehensive energy management programme.
Definition:
"The verification, monitoring and analysis of use of energy including submission of
technical report containing recommendations for improving energy efficiency with cost
benefit analysis and an action plan to reduce energy consumption".
Need for Energy Audit:
In any industry, the three top operating expenses are often found to be energy (both
electrical and thermal), labour and materials. If one were to relate to the manageability of
the cost or potential cost savings in each of the above components, energy would invariably
emerge as a top ranker, and thus energy management function constitutes a strategic area
for cost reduction. Energy Audit will help to understand more about the ways energy and
fuel are used in any industry, and help in identifying the areas where waste can occur and
where scope for improvement exists.
The Energy Audit would give a positive orientation to the energy cost reduction,
preventive maintenance and quality control programmes which are vital for production and
utility activities. Such an audit programme will help to keep focus on variations which
occur in the energy costs, availability and reliability of supply of energy, decide on
appropriate energy mix, identify energy conservation technologies, retrofit for energy
conservation equipment etc.
In general, Energy Audit is the translation of conservation ideas into realities, by lending
technically feasible solutions with economic and other organizational considerations within
a specified time frame.
The primary objective of Energy Audit is to determine ways to reduce energy
consumption per unit of product output or to lower operating costs. Energy Audit provides
a " bench-mark" (Reference point) for managing energy in the organization and also
provides the basis for planning a more effective use of energy throughout the organization.
Type of Energy Audit:
The type of Energy Audit to be performed depends on:
- Function and type of industry
- Depth to which final audit is needed, and
- Potential and magnitude of cost reduction desired
Thus Energy Audit can be classified into the following two types.
i) Preliminary Audit
ii) Detailed Audit
i. Preliminary Energy Audit Methodology
Preliminary energy audit is a relatively quick exercise to:
• Establish energy consumption in the organization
• Estimate the scope for saving
• Identify the most likely (and the easiest areas for attention
• Identify immediate (especially no-/low-cost) improvements/ savings
• Set a 'reference point'
• Identify areas for more detailed study/measurement
• Preliminary energy audit uses existing, or easily obtained data
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
Q) Explain in detail how to conserve electrical energy and explain some of the means
to conserve energy
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
Electrical power is one of the scarce resources in our country. Generation of electricity is
very capital intensive. 1 MW of power generation costs approximately Rs. 4 crores because
of the low plant load factor and high transmission losses prevalent in the country. The
installed capacity of power station has to be therefore, 2.2 times the electrical load.
Energy saving achieved through energy efficiency and conservation also avoids capital
investment in fuel, mining, transport, water and land required for power plant, thereby
mitigating environmental pollution.
Energy Conservation Schemes
Development of an energy conservation programme can provide savings by reduced energy
use. However, it is economical to implement an energy conservation program only when
savings can offset implementation cost over a period of time. Potential areas of conserving
energy and a logical analysis of the methods or techniques of conservation would provide
a systematic and disciplined approach to the entire conservation strategy as a sequel to the
energy audit. Some established conservation trends are replacement, retrofit, process
innovation, fuel conservation and co-generation.
It is generally considered that investment for energy conservation should be judged by
exactly the same criteria as for any other form of capital investment. Energy conservation
measures may be classified on an economic basis and fall into the following three
categories:
(i) Short term: These measures usually involve changes in operating practices resulting in
little or no capital expenditure.
(ii) Medium term: Low-cost modifications and improvements to existing equipment
where the pay-back period is less than two years and often under one year.
(iii) Long term: Modifications involving high capital costs and which frequently involve
the implementation of new techniques and new technologies.
While the first two categories together can achieve savings of the order of 5-10%, capital
expenditure using existing and new technology may achieve a further 10-15%. It is
impossible to give a comprehensive list of all items in each category but selected examples
are given for each section.
i. Short-term energy conservation schemes
Items in this group can be considered as a tightening of operational control and improved
housekeeping.
(a) Furnace efficiencies: Greater emphasis should be placed on minimum excess
combustion air. Oxygen levels of flue gases should be continually monitored and compared
with target values. Oil burners must be cleaned and maintained regularly.
(b) Heat exchangers: In the case of heat where useful heat is transferred from product
streams to feed streams, careful monitoring of performance should be carried out to
determine optimum cleaning cycles. Frequency of cleaning will generally increase as a
result, with consequent improved heat recovery.
(c) Good housekeeping: Doors and windows should be kept closed as much as possible
during the heating season. Wear natural light is sufficient, do not use artificial light. Avoid
excessive ventilation during the heating season. Encourage staff to wear clothing
appropriate to the temperature of the working areas.
(d) Use of steam: Major steam leaks should be repaired as soon as possible after they
occur: often a firm specializing in ‘on stream’ maintenance can be used.
(e) Electrical power: In industries where all the electrical power is ‘imported’
conservation measures can reduce the annual electricity costs by 10–15 percent. Steam
driven turbines may prove more economical as prime movers. Natural air cooling may be
sufficient and therefore induced–draught fans may be taken out of commission. Pumping
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
costs can sometimes be saved by utilizing gravity to move products from one tank to
another. Where possible, use off-peak electricity.
ii. Medium-term energy conservation schemes
Significant savings in energy consumption are often available for quite modest outlays of
Capital based on a pay-back period of less than two years,
(a) Insulation: Improving insulation to prevent cold air leaking into the building and also,
improving insulation of the steam distribution system.
(b) Heating Systems: Improving the time and temperature control of the heating systems
in buildings should result in substantial energy savings.
(c) Replacing air compressors: the damaged air compressors must be replaced by new
ones which gives good compressed air.
(d) Instrumentation: To measure and control the energy conservation parameters,
adequate instrumentation must be provided or operators will soon lose interest in
maintaining efficiencies if they are working with inadequate an unreliable instrument.
(e) Process modifications: Many of these schemes will depend on the nature of the
industry concerned. However, one general scheme will be considered, improved
condensate return systems can increase the amount recovered.
(f) Burners: The control and amount of atomizing stream is important and often in furnaces
and boilers the amount of atomizing steam is far in excess of design.
(g) Electrical Power Savings: Considerable savings may be made by adjusting the
electrical power factor correction.
iii. Long-term energy conservation schemes
To obtain further economics in energy consumption required the spending of significant
amounts of capital, although, in many cases, the return on capital for the long-term
investment may not be as good as that of the medium term. Full financial evaluation is
needed, using the appraisal techniques discussed in Unit-V, to ensure the investment is
economically viable.
(a) Heater modifications: The installation of heating tubes and air pre-heaters to extract
more heat from furnace flue gases.
(b) Improved Insulation: Additional lagging of heated storage tanks. This type of project
often comes within the medium-term group.
(c) Heat recovery: improved heat recovery in the processing areas by additional heat
exchange schemes.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
Sankey diagrams:
Sankey diagrams feature directed arrows that have a width proportional to the flow
quantity visualized: if a flow is twice as wide it represents double the quantity. Flows in the
diagram can show e.g. energy, materials, water or costs.
Within a Sankey diagram the directed flow is always drawn between at least two
nodes (processes). Thus it shows not only flow values but also information about the structure
and distribution of the defined system.
So they are a great alternative to common flow or bar & pie charts. They are gaining
popularity in energy management, facility management, process engineering and process
control and many other kinds of data visualization. Thus Sankey diagrams draw the attention
to the largest entries in the system.
Importance:
In comparison to conventional bar or pie charts and even flow charts, they are more
suitable for visualizing the energy balance or material flows:
The width of the arrows is proportional to the flow quantity: the larger the width of
an arrow, the larger the material or energy flow. The viewer's focus is drawn to the
most significant flows.
The arrows show flows from one node to another node: this fact makes them ideal
for production systems or value chains, as this cannot be achieved using standard
tables (e.g. Excel) or even pie & bar charts.
Thus they communicate your message more attractively: within your team or to
customers and external partners
Through the visualization data inconsistencies can be detected: such as
measurement and transmission error
Sankey diagrams are suitable for a wide range of applications: energy, material flow
& supply chain management or business & marketing analysis
Example:
The illustration shows a Sankey diagram which represents all the primary energy flows
into a factory. The widths of the bands are directly proportional to energy production,
utilization and losses. The primary energy sources are gas, electricity and coal/oil and
represent energy inputs at the left hand side of the Sankey diagram. They can also visualize
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
the energy accounts, material flow accounts on a regional or national level, and also the
breakdown of cost of item or services.
Pie Charts:
A pie chart (or a circle chart) is a circular statistical graphic, which is divided into slices to
illustrate numerical proportion. In a pie chart, the arc length of each slice (and consequently
its central angle and area), is proportional to the quantity it represents. While it is named for
its resemblance to a pie which has been sliced, there are variations on the way it can be
presented.
Pie chart Tips:
Load profiles:
A load profile defines how an electricity customer uses its electricity over time. It is
created using measurements of a customer’s electricity use at regular intervals, typically one
hour, thirty or fifteen minutes, and provides an accurate representation of a customer’s usage
pattern.
Since this requires the use of expensive interval meters, for most customer’s utilities
conduct load studies using interval metering on samples of customer groups or segments and
use the results to represent the segment’s usage pattern. Unless you have an interval meter,
your load profile, for electricity supply pricing purposes will be based on your Rate Code
Average Load Profile and your month-by-month total usage.
A basic fact with electricity pricing is that prices are lowest at night and on
weekends. A fixed price is determined by creating a weighted average price for your
electricity usage for each interval and the cost of electricity for that time period. Since nights
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
and weekends have the lowest cost, the more relative usage during these periods, the lower
your average cost will be.
Example:
This is an average residential load profile. You can see that the usage peaks are
between the hours of 5PM and 10PM, when people come home from work, watch TV,
etc. Usage then drops off, with the lowest point at 3:00AM. You may say, “All my lights are
off at that time!”. Remember, these numbers are averages of all residential users.
Energy Index: -
Energy index is the figure obtained by dividing energy consumption by production output.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
Cost Index:
The cost index is the ratio of cost of energy to the production output.
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 =
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡
The cost index is another parameter which can be used to monitor and assess the
cost of the energy consumptions different energy types.
An individual cost index can be determined for each energy form and total cost index can be
determined for the total energy consumption by the company.
Example:
The table shows below the cost of the different energy forms consumed by company.
The company produce 15x103 tons per year
The cost of particular energy consumption for producing one ton of the produce are given
bellow
Coke cost =108x103/15x103=$ 7.2/ton
Gas cost index=3.6x103/15x103=$ 0.2/ton
Electricity cost index=22.5x103/15x103=$ 1.5/ton
Total cost index=134.1x103/15x103=$ 8.9/ton
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit I Introduction to Energy Auditing
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
Efficiency of EEMs:
whatever input power supplied to the motor is not converted to output due to losses taking
place in the motor is,
stator copper loss 40%
rotor copper loss 20%
iron loss 25%
friction and windage loss 10%
stray loss 5%
Every effort is made to reduce these losses and increase the efficiency in case of an
EEM. Comparison of EEM and STM as per NEMA (national electrical manufacturers
association) is as given table-1
TABLE-1
Comparison of efficiencies and power factor of EEM an STM as per NEMA standards
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
Rotor I2R Use of larger rotor conductor bars increase size of cross section,
lowering conductor resistance (R) and losses due to current flow (I).
Core loss can be reduced by using high grade silicon steel. The silicon
content is up to 4%. The magnetic loss in watts per kg is very low.
Silicon content decreases hysteresis and eddy current loss. Eddy
Core
current loss is further reduced by using very thin laminations for the
core. By employing thinner laminations, core loss reduction is
obtained is up to 10 to 25 %
Friction in the bearing causes the frictional loss. While ventilating fan
and other rotating elements in the motor causes windage loss. In
Friction & EEM, improved bearings are used to reduce the friction loss and
Windage loss optimum design of fan reduces the windage loss. In EEM, less heat
is generated therefore fan size can be reduced to lower the windage
loss.
Features of EEM:
Performance of EEM is better than STM under full, partial and no load conditions. due
to high efficiency, EEMs not only save energy in their own and Contribute to reduced
demand but also energy in the cables and transformer that supply the motor
EEM run cooler. As thermal stresses are low, cooling requirements are low. EEM’s
bearings run about 10˚C cooler than STM bearing. This doubles the insulation life.
EEM’s winding run 20˚ C cooler which increases insulation life by four times
As EEMs have low losses, their slip is smaller than the standard motor. This small slip
causes them to have low starting torque than the standard motor. Therefore, EEM are
not suitable for those applications where high starting torque is required
When slip is small, speed of the motor is high. This high speed causes more power
drawn by the motor as power increases with cube of the speed in some loads. Due to
this, saving obtained due to use of EEM may be lost. Some methods to reduce this
property may be employed for EEM
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
Generally, EEM operate at higher p. f. than the STM. This results in to low losses. Also
amount to be spent in the p. f. correction is saved. Rarely EEM may have lower p. f.
than STM
Starting current is more in case of an EEM than STM. Because of this, sometimes short
circuit protection may trip.
Power Factor
In general power is the capacity to do work. In electrical domain, electrical power is
the amount of electrical energy that can be transferred to some other form (heat, light etc)
per unit time. Mathematically it is the product of voltage drop across the element and current
flowing through it. Considering first the DC circuits, having only DC voltage sources, the
inductors and capacitors behave as short circuit and open circuit respectively in steady state.
Hence the entire circuit behaves as resistive circuit and the entire electrical power is
dissipated in the form of heat. Here the voltage and current are in same phase and the total
electrical power is given by:
Electric Power = Voltage(V) across the element X Current(I) through the element
Now coming to AC circuit, here both inductor and capacitor offer a certain amount of
impedance given by:
The inductor stores electrical energy in the form of magnetic energy and capacitor
stores electrical energy in the form of electrostatic energy. Neither of them dissipates it.
Further, there is a phase shift between voltage and current.
Hence when we consider the entire circuit consisting of a resistor, inductor, and
capacitor, there exists some phase difference between the source voltage and current.
The cosine of this phase difference is called electrical power factor. This factor (0 < cosφ < 1)
represents the fraction of the total power that is used to do the useful work. The other
fraction of electrical power is stored in the form of magnetic energy or electrostatic energy in
the inductor and capacitor respectively.
The total power in this case is:
Total electrical power = Voltage across the element X Current through the element
This is called apparent power and its unit is VA (Volt Amp) and denoted by ‘S’. A
fraction of this total electrical power which does our useful work is called active power. We
denote it as ‘P’.
P = Active power = Total electrical power X cosφ and its unit is watt.
The other fraction of power is called reactive power. Reactive power does no useful
work, but it is required for the active work to be done. We denote it with ‘Q’ and
mathematically is given by:
Q = Reactive power = Total electrical power X sinφ and its unit is VAR (Volt Amp Reactive).
This reactive power oscillates between source and load. To help understand this
better all these power is represented in the form of a triangle.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
Suppose, here is a single phase inductive load which is taking lagging current (I1) and
the load power factor is Cosθ as shown in figure above.
In above figure, a Capacitor (C) has been connected in parallel with load. Now a
current (Ic) is flowing through Capacitor which lead 90° from the supply voltage ( Note that
Capacitor provides leading Current i.e., In a pure capacitive circuit, Current leading 90° from
the supply Voltage, in other words, Voltage are 90° lagging from Current). The load current
is (I). The Vectors combination of (I1) and (Ic) is (I2) which is lagging from voltage at θ1 as shown
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
in phasor diagram. It can be seen from phasor diagram that angle of θ1 < θ2. Therefore, Cosθ2
is less than from Cosθ1.Hence the load power factor is improved by capacitor.
Also note that after the power factor improvement, the circuit current would be less
than from the low power factor circuit current. Also, before and after the power factor
improvement, the active component of current would be same in that circuit because
capacitor eliminates only the re-active component of current. Also, the Active power (in
Watts) would be same after and before power factor improvement.
Advantages:
Capacitor bank offers several advantages over other methods of power factor
improvement.
Losses are low in static capacitors
There is no moving part, therefore need low maintenance
It can work in normal conditions (i.e. ordinary atmospheric conditions)
Do not require a foundation for installation
They are lightweight so it is can be easy to installed
Disadvantages:
The age of static capacitor bank is less (8 – 10 years)
With changing load, we have to ON or OFF the capacitor bank, which causes switching
surges on the system
If the rated voltage increases, then it causes damage it
Once the capacitors spoiled, then repairing is costly
2. Synchronous Condenser
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
In the above phasor, the load current IL lags the voltage by an angle ϕL and the current
through synchronous condenser leads the voltage by an angle ϕM.
So the sum of IL and Im gives the resultant of current I that lags the voltage by angle ϕ. From
the figure it is clear that the angle ϕ is less than ϕL and hence cos ϕ is greater than the cos ϕL.
So the power factor is improved by this method.
Advantages:
We can achieve step less power factor using synchronous condenser method by
changing the magnitude of current with change in excitation.
Faults in synchronous condenser can be removed easily.
The motor windings offer higher thermal stability for higher short circuit currents.
Disadvantages:
3. Phase Advancer
Phase advancer is a simple AC exciter which is connected on the main shaft of the
motor and operates with the motor’s rotor circuit for power factor improvement. Phase
advancer is used to improve the power factor of induction motor in industries.
As the stator windings of induction motor takes lagging current 90° out of phase with
Voltage, therefore the power factor of induction motor is low. If the exciting ampere-turns
are excited by external AC source, then there would be no effect of exciting current on stator
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
windings. Therefore, the power factor of induction motor will be improved. This process is
done by Phase advancer.
Advantages:
Lagging kVAR (Reactive component of Power or reactive power) drawn by the motor is
sufficiently reduced because the exciting ampere turns are supplied at slip frequency (fs).
The phase advancer can be easily used where the use of synchronous motors is
Unacceptable
Disadvantage:
Using Phase advancer is not economical for motors below 200 H.P. (about 150kW)
4. Power Factor correction by using Star – Delta connection
In three phase system, the power factor is improved by connecting the capacitors in star or
delta. The star and delta connected banks are shown in the figure below.
Star Connection
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
The equation (3) shows that the capacitance requires in star connection of three
phase transformer is equal to three times the capacitance requires per phase when the
capacitors are connected in delta. Also, the working voltage of the star connected bank is
1/√3 equal to the delta connected bank.
For these reasons, the capacitors are connected in the delta in three phase system for
power factor improvement. Delta connection is also better if the capacitors are designed for
higher working voltage.
In this scheme, the individual capacitor bank connected with individual load feeder, is
which ON and OFF individually along with load feeder. Hence the scheme provides better
control over reactive power but the scheme is expensive.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
Although installing shunt capacitor bank at every individual load point, compensates
reactive power individually of every load and hence it provides better improvement of voltage
profile, better reduction in individual load losses, and better reduction in energy bill of
individual customer but still it is not practicable as it makes the system complex and
expensive. The main reasons of complexity are in that case, different sizes and capacities of
capacitor bank are required to be installed depending upon the demand of individual load. To
overcome this difficulty, it is always preferable to install a bulk capacitor bank at high voltage
bus system instead of installing smaller capacitor bank at every load point. Although the
control over reactive power of the system is little bit compromised but still it is much practical
approach in the view of complexity and cost. So capacitor bank at load and capacitor bank at
primary systems both have their own benefits. Depending upon the demand of system, both
schemes are used. Capacitor bank can be installed in EHV system, high voltage system,
feeders and individual distribution system.
Distribution System Capacitor Bank
In distribution feeder capacitor bank are installed on pole to compensate reactive
power of that particular feeder. These banks are normally mounted on one of the poles on
which the distribution feeders run. The mounted capacitor banks are normally interconnected
with overhead feeder conductors by means of insulated power cable. The size of the cable
depends upon the voltage rating of the system. The voltage ranges of the system for which
pole mounted capacitor bank can be install, may be from 440 V to 33 KV. The rating of
capacitor bank may be from 300 KVAR to MVAR. The pole mounted capacitor bank can be
either fixed unit or switched unit depending upon varying load condition.
EHV Shunt Capacitor
In extra high voltage system, the generated electrical power may have to be
transmitted a long distance via transmission line. During journey of power, sufficient voltage
may be dropped due to inductive effect of the line conductors. This voltage drop may be
compensated by providing ∑ HV capacitor bank at ∑ HV sub-station. This drop of voltage is
maximum at peak load condition, hence, the capacitor bank installed for in this case should
have switching control to make it off and on as when required.
Substation Capacitor Bank
When high inductive load has to be delivered from a high voltage or medium voltage
substation, one or more capacitor bank of suitable size should be installed at substation to
compensate inductive VAR of the entire load. These capacitors banks are controlled by circuit
breaker and provided with lightening arrestors. Typical protection scheme along with
protection relays are also provided.
Metal Encoder Capacitor Bank
For small and industrial subtraction indoor type capacitor banks may also be used.
These capacitor bank are installed in metal cabinet. This design is compact and bank requires
less maintenance. The uses of these banks are more compared to outdoor bank, as these are
not exposed to external environment.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
the weighted average horsepower is what is significant. RMS calculations determine the
weighted average horsepower.
In addition to reducing the size and cost of a motor for a particular application, RMS loading
also helps improve the overall efficiency and power factor on a duty cycle-type load. For
example, when an oversized motor is operated on a light load, the efficiency is generally fairly
low. So working the motor harder (with a higher average horsepower) will generally result in
improved overall efficiency and reduced operating cost. In order to use the RMS method of
horsepower determination, the duty cycle has to be spelled out in detail as shown in the
following example.
Load (HP) 5 7 1 9 1 8
∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝐻𝑃𝑖 2 × 𝑡𝑖
𝐻𝑃𝑅𝑀𝑆 = √
∑𝑡
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
Over Motoring
In many instances, the practice has been to over motor an application, i.e., to select
a higher-horsepower motor than necessary.
The disadvantages of this practice are
Lower efficiency
Lower power factor
Higher motor cost
Higher controller cost
Higher installation costs
Example: Consider the comparisons of the 40-hp motor that could have been selected based
on the peak load versus the 30-hp motor that can be selected on the basis of the duty cycle:
1. Motor cost: list price of standard open 1800-rpm drip-proof motor:
30 hp = $1160 40 hp = $1446
2. Control Cost: NEMA-1 general-purpose motor, 240-V starter:
30 hp, size 3 = $600 40 hp, size 4 = $1350
This results in a cost difference of $1036, or 59%
Power factor with nonlinear loads
Power factor is a measure of how effectively a specific load consumes electricity to
produce work. The higher the power factor, the more work produced for a given voltage and
current. Figure shows the power vector relationships for both linear and non-linear loads.
Power factor is always measured as the ratio between real power in kilowatts (kW) and
apparent power in kilo volt amperes (kVA).
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit II Energy Efficient Motors and Power Factor Improvement
For linear loads, the apparent power in kVA (S = V•I) is the vector sum of the reactive
power in kVAR (Q) and the real power in kW (P). The power factor is P/S = CosΦ, where Φ is
the angle between S and P. This angle is the same as the displacement angle between the
voltage and the current for linear loads. For a given amount of current, increasing the
displacement angle will increase Q, decrease P, and lower the PF. Inductive loads such as
induction motors cause their current to lag the voltage, capacitors cause their current to lead
the voltage, and purely resistive loads draw their current in-phase with the voltage. For
circuits with strictly linear loads (a rare situation) simple capacitor banks may be added to the
system to improve a lagging power factor due to induction motors or other lagging loads.
For non-linear loads, the harmonic currents they draw produce no useful work and
therefore are reactive in nature. The power vector relationship becomes 3 dimensional with
distortion reactive power, H, combining with both Q and P to produce the apparent power
which the power system must deliver. Power factor remains the ratio of kW to kVA but the
kVA now has a harmonic component as well. True power factor becomes the combination of
displacement power factor and distortion power factor. For most typical non-linear loads, the
displacement power factor will be near unity. True power factor however, is normally very
low because of the distortion component. For example, the displacement power factor of a
personal computer will be near unity but its total power factor is often in the 0.65 – 0.7 range.
The best way to improve a poor power factor caused by non-linear loads is to remove the
harmonic currents.
Most Utilities charge their customers for energy supplied in kilowatt-hours during the
billing period plus a demand charge for that period. The demand charge is based upon the
peak load during the period. The demand charge is applied by the utility because it must
provide equipment large enough for the peak kVA demand even though the customer’s
power demand may be much lower. If the power factor during the peak period (usually a 10-
minute sliding window) is lower than required by the utility (usually 0.9 or 0.95), the utility
may also apply a low PF penalty charge as part of the demand charge portion of the bill.
Suppose the peak demand was 800kW with apparent power consumption of 1000kVA
(a PF of 0.8). If a power factor penalty was applied at 0.9, the Utility would charge the
customer as if his demand was 0.9 x 1000kVA = 900kW even though his peak was really
800kW, a penalty of 100kW. Improving the power factor to 0.85 at 1000kVA demand would
lower the penalty to just 50kW. For power factors of 0.9 to 1.0, there would be no penalty
and the demand charge would be based upon the actual peak kW. The demand charge is
often a substantial part of the customer’s overall power bill, so it is worthwhile to maintain
good power factor during peak loading and reducing the harmonic current as drawn by the
loads can help achieve this
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Lighting Terms
Brightness - the intensity of the sensation which results from viewing a surface or space which
directs light into the eyes.
Colour Rendition - the effect of a light source on the colour appearance of objects in
conscious or subconscious comparison with their colour appearance under a reference or
standard light source.
Contrast - the relationship between the brightness of an object and its immediate
background.
Distribution - the dispensing or spreading of light over a surface.
Ellipsoidal Reflector Lamps - incandescent lamps designed to be placed in canister fixtures;
they direct more light out of the fixture.
Foot-candle - the basic measure used to indicate level of illumination. One-foot candle (fc) is
equal to one unit of light flux distributed evenly over a one-square foot surface area. (See
lumens).
High-Pressure Sodium - the most efficient light source of the high intensity discharge family.
It provides a light golden colour and long life.
Low-Pressure Sodium - presently the most efficient light source available. Applications are
limited because of its poor yellow colour.
Lumens - the measurement of light flux produced by a lamp, as opposed to foot-candles
which represent the amount of all light - reflected or otherwise - within one square foot.
Lumens-per-watt - the relative measure of efficiency (referred to as efficacy) of a light source,
calculated by dividing the light output (lumens) by the electrical power input to produce that
light (watts) for a given lamp type.
Metal Halide - an efficient high intensity light source with crisp, white colour.
Task Lighting - lighting that falls on a given viewing task or object, supplementary lighting as
opposed to general overall lighting level.
Lighting Energy Audit
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Simple retrofit possibilities, such as switching from general lighting to task lighting are
considered.
For example, by simply lowering the fixture height, a lighting system can be
changed from general to task-oriented with a desirable increase in contrast between
the task area and the general workplace.
Also, painting equipment slightly lighter than the surrounding area adds contrast and
aids workers in discerning moving parts, thereby increasing safety. Possible areas for
these improvements are noted during the audit.
After all the simple retrofit options are examined, a plan for the general modification
of the plant lighting is devised. Such a plan integrates simple modifications and major
improvements into a cohesive, energy efficient system.
Daylighting
Installation of skylights in conjunction with automatic dimming devices can yield significant
savings in some environments.
Control Devices
The installation of various lighting control devices can reduce energy costs. Recent
technological advances in industrial lighting system components and controls make it possible
to reduce consumption significantly through scheduling and automatic control.
Convert to Energy Efficient Fluorescent Lamps
One attractive alternative for energy conservation is replacing existing fluorescent lamps with
the new lower wattage energy efficient ones.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Adequate heat dissipation to prevent over-heating of the lamp, wiring and ancillary
equipment
High light output ratio with the appropriate light distribution
Ease of installation, cleaning and maintenance
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Let’s understand it with an example. If the number of turns in the secondary winding
is 100, then the current induced in the secondary winding will be 1/100th of the current
flowing through the primary winding. This means that for measuring 100 amp of current, only
1 amp will reach to the input of meter. Using this methodology, we can easily measure even
large currents with clamp meter just by increasing the number of turns in the secondary
winding.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Similar to current transformer Clamp Meters, Hall Effect clamp meters also consists of
two clamps made of Ferrite Iron. However, these clamps are not wrapped up with copper
wires like in case of Current transformer clamp meters. In Hall Effect clamp meter, the
magnetic field induced by the current flowing through the conductor is concentrated in the
gap(s) (one or more) of the core whenever the clamps close around the conductor.
When you carefully see the clamp tips, you can notice the existence of Gap. When
both the clamps of Hall Effect clamp meter meet/ close, the Gap in the Clamp core creates an
air pocket where the magnetic field is concentrated. The gap also ensures that the core should
not be saturated by limiting the magnetic flux. There is a small semiconductor component
inside the gap which is known as Hall Effect Sensor. This Hall Effect Sensor is not visible as it
is covered with a plastic molding. The Hall Effect Sensor is a special transducer which can vary
its output voltage depending on the increase or decrease of magnetic field due to current
flowing in the conductor. This property of Hall Effect sensor is used to measure current. The
voltage generated by the Hall Effect Sensor is further amplified and scaled for representing
the current flowing through the conductor.
The Hall Effect Clamp meter can also measure DC current as the core is capable of
concentrating DC magnetic fields also. However, when measuring the current, these clamp
meters must be zeroed to avoid presence of errors due to magnetic field of Earth or any other
magnetic field source in near vicinity.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Thermocouple
Basically thermocouple consists of two different metals which are placed in contact with each
other as shown in the diagram.
First part is called the heater element because when the current will flow through this,
a heat is produced and thus the temperature will increased at the junction. At this junction
an emf is produced which is approximately proportional to the temperature difference of hot
and cold junctions.
The emf produced is a DC voltage which is directly proportional to root mean square
value of electric current. A permanent magnet moving coil instrument is connected with the
second part to read the current passing through the heater. The thermocouple type
instruments employ thermocouple in their construction. Thermocouple type instruments can
be used for both ac and DC applications. Also thermocouple type of instruments has greater
accuracy in measuring the current and voltages at very high frequency accurately.
Now we will look how the temperature difference is mathematically related to generated emf
at the junction in thermocouple type of instruments. Let us consider temperature of the
heater element be Ta and the temperature of cold metal be Tb.
Now it is found that the generated emf at the junction is related to temperature difference
as:
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
There is no requirement of heating element, the electric current which directly passing
through the thermocouple raises the temperature which is directly proportional to the I2R
losses. The bridge works on balanced condition at which there will be no current in the arm
ab. The connected meter will show the potential difference between the junctions a and b.
Advantages:
1. The thermocouple type of instruments accurately indicates the root mean square
value of current and voltages irrespective of the waveform. There is a wide varieties
of range of thermocouple instruments are available in the market.
2. Thermocouple type of instruments give very accurate reading even at high frequency,
thus these types of instruments are completely free from frequency errors.
3. The measurement of quantity under these instruments is not affected by
stray magnetic fields.
4. These instruments are known for their high sensitivity.
5. Usually for measuring the low value of current bridge type of arrangement is used i.e.
ranging from 0.5 Amperes to 20 Amperes while for measuring the higher value of
current heater element is required to retain accuracy.
Disadvantages:
Instead of many advantages these type of instruments possess one disadvantage,
The over load capacity of thermocouple type of instrument is small, even fuse is not able to
the heater wire because heater wire may burn out before the fuse blows out.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Pyrometer
Working Principle –
When temperature being measured is very high and physical contact with the
medium to be measured is impossible or impractical, optical pyrometers based on the
principle of thermal radiation are used. These Pyrometer Working Principle are used under
condition where corrosive vapours or liquids would destroy thermocouples, resistance
thermometer and thermistor, if made to come in contact with the measured medium.
Radiation pyrometers measures the radiant (energy) heat emitted or reflected by a hot
object. Thermal radiation is an electromagnetic radiation emitted as a result of temperature
and lies in the wavelength of 0.1 —100 μm.
According to the principle of thermal radiation, the energy radiated from a hot body
is a function of its temperature. Referring to Fig. 13.54, the heat radiated by the hot body is
focused on a radiation detector. The radiation detector is blackened and it absorbs all or
almost all radiation falling on it (if the temperature is very small compared with that of hot
body, then
Therefore, the heat received by the detector is proportional to the fourth power of the
absolute temperature of the hot body.
Radiation pyrometers are of two types.
i. Total Radiation Pyrometers
ii. Optical Pyrometers
i. Total Radiation Pyrometers:
The total radiation pyrometer receives all the radiation from a particular are of hot
body. The term total radiation includes both the visible and invisible radiations. It consists of
radiation receiving element and a measuring device.
The mirror type radiation pyrometer is shown in figure below. Here, the diaphragm
unit along with a mirror is used to focus the radiation on a thermocouple. The distance
between the mirror and the thermocouple is adjusted for proper focus.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Here, the image of the front diaphragm is focused on the thermocouple by the mirror.
Therefore, the temperature measurements are independent of the distance of the target.
If there is any smoke, dust in the space between the target and transducer, it reduces
the radiation. Hence negative errors. If there are any heat sources like hot gases and flames,
then the meter reading will be high.
The characteristics of this pyrometer is non-linear. It has poor sensitivity. This device
is not used for temperature lower than 600 to 1200 degree Celsius. Output from this
pyrometer is taken to pmmc instrument.
Advantages of Radiation pyrometer:
Non-linear scale
Error will occur
Emissivity of target material affects the measurements
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
An eye piece at one end and an objective lens at the other end.
A power source (battery), rheostat and millivolt meter (to measure current) connected to a
reference temperature bulb.
An absorption screen is placed in between the objective lens and reference
temperature lamp. The absorption screen is used to increase the range of the temperature
which can be measured by the instrument. The red filter between the eye piece and the lamp
allows only a narrow band of wavelength of around 0.65mui
Operation of optical pyrometer:
When a temperature source is to be measured, the radiation from the source are
focused onto the filament of the reference temperature lamp using the objective lens. Now
the eye piece is adjusted so that the filament of the reference temperature lamp is in sharp
focus and the filament is seen super imposed on the image of the temperature source. Now
the observer starts controlling the lamp current and the filament will appear dark as in figure
(a) if the filament is cooler than the temperature source, the filament will appear bright as in
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
figure (b) if the filament is hotter than the temperature source, the filament will not be seen
as in figure (c) if the filament and temperature source are in the same temperature.
Hence the observer should control the lamp current until the filament and the
temperature source have the same brightness which will be noticed when the filament
disappears as in figure (c) in the superimposed image of the temperature source [ that is the
brightness of the lamp and the temperature source are same]. At the instance, the current
flowing through the lamp which is indicated by the millivolt meter connected to the lamp
becomes a measure of the temperature of the temperature source when calibrated.
Temperature of more than 700’C can only be measured since illumination of the
temperature source is a must for measurement. Since it is manually operated, it cannot be
used for the continuous monitoring and controlling purpose.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Lux Meter
Lux is a measurement of the overall intensity of light within an environment for any
given area or distance from the source or lux is the amount of light in an environments
perceived by the human eye. Quality of light in workplace, schools and public buildings affect
the quantity and quality of performance in workers and students.
In other words, the lux is a unit of measurement of brightness, or more accurately,
illuminance. The illumination is how level of luminous flux is falling on a surface area. The
luminous flux is visible component that is defined in radiant flux (light power) divided by
relative sensitivity of human eyes over the visible spectrum. This means the Lux is well fit to
light level from sense of human eyes. Lux is ultimately derives from the candela, the standard
unit of measurement for the power of light.
Measuring Lighting Levels
Measuring lighting or the illumination of an environment requires the use of
an incident Lux meter or foot-candle meter. A lux meter is a device for measuring brightness.
It specifically measures the intensity with which the brightness appears to the human eye.
This is different than measurements of the actual light energy produced by or reflected from
an object or light source.
A lux meter works by using a photo cell to capture light. The meter then converts this
light to an electrical current. Measuring this current allows the device to calculate the lux
value of the light it captured.
The lux light meter’s calculation of illuminance is done by using the Point Source
process. The measure of the lux light meter varies depending on the light’s intensity and
distance. If a point source has no reflections, a portion of the produced light reaches a
surface.
Applications of Lux meter
i) Photography and Video Filming. By measuring the light in luxes, photographers can adjust
their shutter speed and depth of field to get the best picture quality. The device can also be
very useful for filming outdoor scenes of television programs or movies as it allows
adjustments to make sure scenes filmed in different light levels have a consistent brightness
on screen.
ii) Health and Safety regulations: It can be used to check whether the brightness of a room is
enough to meet any rules designed to protect workers from suffering damage to their
eyesight. Using a lux meter takes into account the size of the room in a way that simply
measuring the intensity of the light source in lumens would not.
iii) Photographic Measurements; It also measures the photography subject’s
illuminance. When using a lux light meter, the photographer can determine the aperture
number and the exposure setting.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit III Lighting and Energy Instruments for Audit
Wattmeter
Construction of a Wattmeter:
The internal construction of a wattmeter is such that it consists of two cols. One of the
coil is in series and the other is connected in parallel. The coil that is connected in series with
the circuit is known as the current coil and the one that is connected in parallel with the circuit
is known as the voltage coil. These coils are named according to the convention because the
current of the circuit passes through the current coil and the voltage is dropped across the
potential coil, also named as the voltage coil.
The needle that is supposed to move on the marked scale to indicate the amount of
power is also attached to the potential coil. The reason for this is that the potential coil is
allowed to move whereas the current coil is kept fixed.
The construction of a wattmeter is shown in the figure below.
Working of a Wattmeter:
When the current passes through the current coil, it creates an electromagnetic field
around the coil. The strength of this electromagnetic field is directly proportional to the
amount of current passing through it.
In case of DC current, the current is also in phase with its generated electromagnetic
field. The voltage is dropped across the potential coil and as a result of this complete process,
the needle moves across the scale. The needle deflection is such that it is according to the
product of the current passing and the voltage dropped, that is, P = VI.
This was the case of DC power. We know that the AC power is given by the formula P = VIcosθ,
and we know that this cosθ factor is because of the fact that the current and voltage are not
in phase.
Applications of Wattmeter
1. As other measuring instruments, watt meters are also used extensively in electrical circuit
measurement and debugging.
2. They are also used in industries to check the power rating and consumption of electrical
appliances.
3. Electromagnetic watt meters are used to measure utility frequencies.
4. They are used with refrigerators, electric heaters and other equipment to measure their
power ratings.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
Dedinition: ‘Scientific control of usage and demand of Electricity, for achieving better load
factor and economy, by the Licensee/Supplier’.
Demand Side Management (DSM) means managing of the demand for power, by
utilities and distribution companies, among some or all its customers to meet current or
future needs. DSM programs result in energy and / or demand reduction. Usually, the goal of
demand side management is to encourage the consumer to use less energy during peak
hours, or to move the time of energy use to off-peak times such as night time and weekends
thereby reducing the need for buying expensive imported power during peak hours. Peak
demand management does not necessarily decrease total energy consumption, but could be
expected to reduce the need for investments in networks and/or power plants.
DSM also enables end-users to better manage their load curve and thus improves the
profitability. Potential energy saving through DSM is treated same as new additions on the
supply side in MWs. DSM can reduce the capital needs for power capacity expansion.
Concept of DSM:
Cost reduction: Many DSM and energy efficiency efforts have been introduced in the context
of integrated resource planning and aimed at reducing total costs of meeting energy demand;
Environmental and social improvement: energy efficiency and DSM may be pursued to
achieve environmental and/or social goals by reducing energy use, leading to reduced
greenhouse gas emissions;
Reliability and network issues: ameliorating and/or averting problems in the electricity
network through reducing demand in ways which maintain system reliability in the immediate
term and over the longer term defer the need for network augmentation;
Improved markets: short-term responses to electricity market conditions (“demand
response”), particularly by reducing load during periods of high market prices caused by
reduced generation or network capacity.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
of electricity should logically vary from hour to hour. The efficiency advantages of such a
pricing system are readily apparent.
In theory, marginal cost pricing can be applied with a high degree of exactness: a
different price is charged every hour, depending upon the marginal costs of the system. In
fact, many utilities use this type of pricing system when they interchange power with other
utilities. The actual marginal costs of the selling utility are calculated for each hour when the
power is interchanged; this rate is used as the price charged the purchasing utility.
Realistically, such a pricing system cannot be applied to all customers, even though it is
theoretically possible. When two utilities interchange power, a rather substantial amount of
electricity is normally involved. Thus, the transaction cost of calculating the bill under such a
complicated pricing system is small, relative to the total value of the transaction. But if the
transaction costs per KWH are very high for small customers, a complicated pricing system
would not be appropriate. Furthermore, utilities are fairly sophisticated consumers of
electricity. When they purchase power from another system, they presumably have the
knowledge and the time commitment to make wise purchasing decisions, even under a
pricing system which varies hourly. obviously, most small residential and commercial
customers lack the time and knowledge to constantly monitor their usage of electricity under
highly variable conditions. Finally, implementation of such a pricing structure would require
relatively expensive metering equipment, like magnetic recording. Hence, metering costs
would undoubtedly be prohibitive for very small customers, although a more simplified price
structure may be feasible.
Example:
To illustrate, there are two customers who are the same in every way except for their
consumption patterns. The first customer only uses electricity late at night when the marginal
costs of production are very low, like 1 cent per KWH; the second customer only uses
electricity at the peak usage hours of the day when the marginal costs of production are very
high, like 10 cents per KWH. Given their usage, it is hardly fair to charge them same price.
Under a time-ofday pricing system, this inequity can be corrected because the nocturnal user
is charged less than the peak-hour consumer.
ii. Multi-utility power exchange model
Multi-utility relates to companies offering a wide range of services and/or products.
In the business market, this type of service provision usually relates to energy, environmental
services, waste issues, infrastructure and/or telecom services. In the consumer market, it
often concerns a combined offering of services in the field of energy and digital products and
services (telephony, internet and television).
Providers like these are also referred to as multi-service providers. So it often concerns
services and products in relation to public utilities. Multi-utility has a relation with cross-
selling, offering complementary products and services.
In a multiple (multi-utility or multi-country) integrated system setting, each integrated
system “speaks” with its neighbour in terms of spot prices at their common borders; they buy
or sell energy at the spot price of the specific instant and location. The resulting operating
point is the same as the one achieved under a fully centralized dispatch. When dispatching
the utilities, the control centre associated to each system must not discriminate between its
own generators’ power and power offered by the neighboring systems through tie-lines,
except for economic reasons.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
Multi utility become very popular amongst power companies in the 90’s. As a
consequence of liberalization of the energy market, these companies were looking for
opportunities to widen their product range.
The power exchange is an institution which is created by a regulatory framework whose main
objectives are to employ and run competitive auctions of energy on a non-discriminatory
basis and to ensure electricity supply at market prices. It is the counter party in every purchase
and sale transaction, it manages the settlement process and establishes guarantees. It doesn’t
enter in to any transaction its own, as it is privy to sensitive information.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit IV Introduction to Demand Side Management
and reducing greenhouse gasses emission. Therefore, it will have an impact on operations,
expenditure and performance. Efficient utilization of energy makes the machines more
efficient and an efficient machine gives better performance. Machines operating efficiently
under less duress will have fewer breakdowns, which translate into more output with better
energy intensity. Overall, an efficient operation will not only create a safe work environment
but will also help in grooming a motivated workforce striving for economical operations.
The energy management program structure in an organization is shown below
Most successful organizations and individuals set goals, develop plans to meet them
and continually monitor their progress. To put together a plan that will work for the unique
requirements of your company, follow these six easy steps:
Step 1: Establish a clear vision- Create goals that are specific, measurable, attainable, realistic
and trackable ("SMART").
Step 2: Create the team- Appoint an energy champion who will develop the plan, obtain
approval to proceed, build your team and manage implementation. Build your team to
include decision makers as well as a diverse group that represents your workplace.
Step 3: Know your workplace- Figure out who are your target audiences to determine the
tools you will use to communicate with them. Consider the audience’s size, where it's located
and whether it is located in multiple facilities.
Step 4: Develop your communications plan- Identify and document what you need to say to
your employees, and how to say it. Define your key messages; choose a communications style
that is consistent with that used in your organization, and then list out the activities, schedule
and budget you’ll need to make your plan work.
Step 5: Implement your plan- Educate your employees/occupants/students in energy-
conserving habits and behaviours. Deliver the activities you and your team have selected.
Monitor the program and its effects, and lead by example.
Step 6: Recognize and reward- Reward those who have contributed to achieving your goals.
Annual programs can help remind your employees and occupants of their energy-saving
habits and accomplishments.
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit V Economics and Cost Effectiveness Tests of DSM Programs
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit V Economics and Cost Effectiveness Tests of DSM Programs
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit V Economics and Cost Effectiveness Tests of DSM Programs
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit V Economics and Cost Effectiveness Tests of DSM Programs
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit V Economics and Cost Effectiveness Tests of DSM Programs
S Bhargava Reddy
Unit V Economics and Cost Effectiveness Tests of DSM Programs
S Bhargava Reddy
Chapter 2
Participant Test
Definition
The Participants Test is the measure of the quantifiable benefits and costs to the customer due
to participation in a program. Since many customers do not base their decision to participate in
a program entirely on quantifiable variables, this test cannot be a complete measure of the
benefits and costs of a program to a customer.
In the case of fuel substitution programs, benefits to the participant also include the avoided
capital and operating costs of the equipment/appliance not chosen. For load building programs,
participant benefits include an increase in productivity and/or service, which is presumably equal
to or greater than the productivity/ service without participating. The inclusion of these benefits
is not required for this test, but if they are included then the societal test should also be
performed.
The costs to a customer of program participation are all out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a
result of participating in a program, plus any increases in the customer's utility bill(s). The out-
of-pocket expenses include the cost of any equipment or materials purchased, including sales
tax and installation; any ongoing operation and maintenance costs; any removal costs (less
salvage value); and the value of the customer's time in arranging for the installation of the
measure, if significant.
1
Gross energy savings are considered to be the savings in energy and demand seen by the participant at the
meter. These are the appropriate program impacts to calculate bill reductions for the Participant Test. Net
savings are assumed to be the savings that are attributable to the program. That is, net savings are gross savings
minus those changes in energy use and demand that would have happened even in the absence of the program.
For fuel substitution and load building programs, gross-to-net considerations account for the impacts that would
have occurred in the absence of the program.
8
How the Results can be Expressed
The results of this test can be expressed in four ways: through a net present value per average
participant, a net present value for the total program, a benefit-cost ratio or discounted payback.
The primary means of expressing test results is net present value for the total program;
discounted payback, benefit-cost ratio, and per participant net present value are secondary tests.
The discounted payback is the number of years it takes until the cumulative discounted benefits
equal or exceed the cumulative discounted costs. The shorter the discounted payback, the more
attractive or beneficial the program is to the participants. Although "payback period" is often
defined as undiscounted in the textbooks, a discounted payback period is used here to
approximate more closely the consumer's perception of future benefits and costs.2
Net present value (NPVp) gives the net dollar benefit of the program to an average participant or
to all participants discounted over some specified time period. A net present value above zero
indicates that the program is beneficial to the participants under this test.
The benefit-cost ratio (BCRp) is the ratio of the total benefits of a program to the total costs
discounted over some specified time period. The benefit-cost ratio gives a measure of a rough
rate of return for the program to the participants and is also an indication of risk. A benefit-cost
ratio above one indicates a beneficial program.
For programs that involve a utility incentive, the Participant Test can be used for program design
considerations such as the minimum incentive level, whether incentives are really needed to
induce participation, and whether changes in incentive levels will induce the desired amount of
participation.
These test results can be useful for program penetration analyses and developing program
participation goals, which will minimize adverse ratepayer impacts and maximize benefits.
For fuel substitution programs, the Participant Test can be used to determine whether program
participation (i.e. choosing one fuel over another) will be in the long-run best interest of the
customer. The primary means of establishing such assurances is the net present value, which
looks at the costs and benefits of the fuel choice over the life of the equipment.
2
It should be noted that if a demand-side program is beneficial to its participants (NPVp > 0 and BCRp > 1.0)
using a particular discount rate, the program has an internal rate of return (IRR) of at least the value of the
discount rate.
9
judgment. Participant Test results play only a supportive role in any assessment of conservation
and load management programs as alternatives to supply projects.
Formulae
The following are the formulas for discounted payback, the net present value (NPVp) and the
benefit-cost ratio (BCRp) for the Participant Test.
NPVP = Bp - Cp
NPVavp = (Bp - Cp) / P
BCRp = Bp / Cp
DPp = Min j such that Bj > Cj
Where:
The Benefit (Bp) and Cost (Cp) terms are further defined as follows:
N
BRt + TC t + INC t N
ABat + PAat
BP = ∑ + ∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1 t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
N
PC t + BI t
C=∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
Where:
3
Some difference of opinion exists as to what should be called an incentive. The term can be interpreted broadly
to include almost anything. Direct rebates, interest payment subsidies, and even energy audits can be called
incentives. Operationally, it is necessary to restrict the term to include only dollar benefits such as rebates or
rate incentives (monthly bill credits). Information and services such as audits are not considered incentives for
the purposes of these tests. If the incentive is to offset a specific participant cost, as in a rebate-type incentive,
the full customer cost (before the rebate must be included in the PCt term
10
• Ongoing operation and maintenance costs include fuel cost
• Removal costs, less salvage value
• Value of the customer's time in arranging for installation, if
significant
PACat = Participant avoided costs in year t for alternate fuel devices (costs of
devices not chosen)
Abat = Avoided bill from alternate fuel in year t
The first summation in the Bp equation should be used for conservation and load management
programs. For fuel substitution programs, both the first and second summations should be used
for Bp.
Note that in most cases, the customer bill impact terms (BRt, BIt, and ABat) are further
determined by costing period to reflect load impacts and/or rate schedules, which vary
substantially by time of day and season. The formulas for these variables are as follows:
I I
BRt = ∑ (∆EGit × AC : E it × K it ) + ∑ (∆DGit × AC : Dit × K it ) + OBRt
i =1 i =1
ABat = (Use BRt formula, but with rates and costing periods appropriate for the alternate
fuel utility)
I I
BI t = ∑ (∆EGit × AC : E it × ( K it − 1)) + ∑ (∆DGit × AC : Dit × ( K it − 1)) + OBI t
i =1 i =1
Where:
∆EGit = Reduction in gross energy use in costing period i in year t
∆DG it = Reduction in gross billing demand in costing period i in year t
AC:Eit = Rate charged for energy in costing period i in year t
AC:Dit = Rate charged for demand in costing period i in year t
Kit = 1 when ∆EGit or ∆DGit is positive (a reduction) in costing period i in
year t, and zero otherwise
OBRt = Other bill reductions or avoided bill payments (e.g.,, customer charges,
standby rates).
OBIt = Other bill increases (i.e. customer charges, standby rates).
I = Number of periods of participant’s participation
In load management programs such as TOU rates and air-conditioning cycling, there are often
no direct customer hardware costs. However, attempts should be made to quantify indirect
costs customers may incur that enable them to take advantage of TOU rates and similar
programs.
4
If money is borrowed by the customer to cover this cost, it may not be necessary to calculate the annual
mortgage and discount this amount if the present worth of the mortgage payments equals the initial cost. This
occurs when the discount rate used is equal to the interest rate of the mortgage. If the two rates differ (e.g., a
loan offered by the utility), then the stream of mortgage payments should be discounted by the discount rate
chosen.
11
If no customer hardware costs are expected or estimates of indirect costs and value of service
are unavailable, it may not be possible to calculate the benefit-cost ratio and discounted payback
period.
12
Chapter 3
The Ratepayer Impact Measure Test5
Definition
The Ratepayer Impact Measure (RIM) test measures what happens to customer bills or rates
due to changes in utility revenues and operating costs caused by the program. Rates will go
down if the change in revenues from the program is greater than the change in utility costs.
Conversely, rates or bills will go up if revenues collected after program implementation are less
than the total costs incurred by the utility in implementing the program. This test indicates the
direction and magnitude of the expected change in customer bills or rate levels.
The costs for this test are the program costs incurred by the utility, and/or other entities
incurring costs and creating or administering the program, the incentives paid to the
participant, decreased revenues for any periods in which load has been decreased and increased
supply costs for any periods when load has been increased. The utility program costs include
initial and annual costs, such as the cost of equipment, operation and maintenance, installation,
program administration, and customer dropout and removal of equipment (less salvage value).
The decreases in revenues and the increases in the supply costs should be calculated for both
fuels for fuel substitution programs using net savings.
5
The Ratepayer Impact Measure Test has previously been described under what was called the "Non-Participant
Test." The Non-Participant Test has also been called the "Impact on Rate Levels Test."
13
The lifecycle revenue impact (LRI) is the one-time change in rates or the bill change over the life
of the program needed to bring total revenues in line with revenue requirements over the life of
the program. The rate increase or decrease is expected to be put into effect in the first year of
the program. Any successive rate changes such as for cost escalation are made from there. The
first-year revenue impact (FRI) is the change in rates in the first year of the program or the bill
change needed to get total revenues to match revenue requirements only for that year. The
annual revenue impact (ARI) is the series of differences between revenues and revenue
requirements in each year of the program. This series shows the cumulative rate change or bill
change in a year needed to match revenues to revenue requirements. Thus, the ARIRIM for year
six per kWh is the estimate of the difference between present rates and the rate that would be in
effect in year six due to the program. For results expressed as lifecycle, annual, or first-year
revenue impacts, negative results indicate favorable effects on the bills of ratepayers or
reductions in rates. Positive test result values indicate adverse bill impacts or rate increases.
Net present value (NPVRIM) gives the discounted dollar net benefit of the program from the
perspective of rate levels or bills over some specified time period. A net present value above zero
indicates that the program will benefit (lower) rates and bills.
The benefit-cost ratio (BCR RIM) is the ratio of the total benefits of a program to the total costs
discounted over some specified time period. A benefit-cost ratio above one indicates that the
program will lower rates and bills.
An additional strength of the RIM test is that the test can be used for all demand-side
management programs (conservation, load management, fuel substitution, and load building).
This makes the RIM test particularly useful for comparing impacts among demand-side
management options.
Some of the units of measurement for the RIM test are of greater value than others, depending
upon the purpose or type of evaluation. The lifecycle revenue impact per customer is the most
useful unit of measurement when comparing the merits of programs with highly variable scopes
(e.g.,, funding levels) and when analyzing a wide range of programs that include both electric
and natural gas impacts. Benefit-cost ratios can also be very useful for program design
evaluations to identify the most attractive programs or program elements.
14
Results of the RIM test are probably less certain than those of other tests because the test is
sensitive to the differences between long-term projections of marginal costs and long-term
projections of rates, two cost streams that are difficult to quantify with certainty.
RIM test results are also sensitive to assumptions regarding the financing of program costs.
Sensitivity analyses and interactive analyses that capture feedback effects between system
changes, rate design options, and alternative means of financing generation and non-generation
options can help overcome these limitations. However, these types of analyses may be difficult
to implement.
An additional caution must be exercised in using the RIM test to evaluate a fuel substitution
program with multiple end use efficiency options. For example, under conditions where
marginal costs are less than average costs, a program that promotes an inefficient appliance may
give a more favorable test result than a program that promotes an efficient appliance. Though
the results of the RIM test accurately reflect rate impacts, the implications for long-term
conservation efforts need to be considered.
Formulae: The formulae for the lifecycle revenue impact (LRI RIM)' net present value (NPV
RIM), benefit-cost ratio (BCR RIM)' the first-year revenue impacts and annual revenue impacts
are presented below:
LRIRIM = Lifecycle revenue impact of the program per unit of energy (kWh or therm)
or demand (kW) (the one-time change in rates) or per customer (the change
in customer bills over the life of the program). (Note: An appropriate choice
of kWh, therm, kW, and customer should be made)
FRIRIM = First-year revenue impact of the program per unit of energy, demand, or per
customer.
ARIRIM = Stream of cumulative annual revenue impacts of the program per unit of
energy, demand, or per customer. (Note: The terms in the ARI formula are
not discounted; thus they are the nominal cumulative revenue impacts.
Discounted cumulative revenue impacts may be calculated and submitted if
they are indicated as such. Note also that the sum of the discounted stream of
cumulative revenue impacts does not equal the LRI RIM')
15
The BRIM and CRIM terms are further defined as follows:
N UAC t + RGt N
UAC at
B RIM ∑ +∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
N
UIC t + RLt + PRC t + INC t N RLat
C RIM ∑ +∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1 t =1 (1 + d )
t −1
N
Et
E=∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
Where:
UACt = Utility avoided supply costs in year t
UICt = Utility increased supply costs in year t
RGt = Revenue gain from increased sales in year t
RLt = Revenue loss from reduced sales in year t
PRCt = Program Administrator program costs in year t
Et = System sales in kWh, kW or therms in year t or first year customers
UACat = Utility avoided supply costs for the alternate fuel in year t
Rlat = Revenue loss from avoided bill payments for alternate fuel in year t (i.e.,
device not chosen in a fuel substitution program)
For fuel substitution programs, the first term in the B RIM and C RIM equations represents the
sponsoring utility (electric or gas), and the second term represents the alternate utility. The RIM
test should be calculated separately for electric and gas and combined electric and gas.
The utility avoided cost terms (UACt, UICt, and UACat) are further determined by costing
period to reflect time-variant costs of supply:
I I
UCAt = ∑ (∆EN it × MC : E it × K it ) + ∑ (∆DN it × MC : Dit × K it )
i =1 i =1
UACat = (Use UACt formula, but with marginal costs and costing periods appropriate for
the alternate fuel utility.)
I I
UIC t ∑ (∆EN it × MC : E it × ( K it − 1)) + ∑ (∆DN it × MC : D × ( K it − 1))
i =1 i =1
Where:
16
The revenue impact terms (RGt, RLt, and RLat ) are parallel to the bill impact terms in the
Participant Test. The terms are calculated exactly the same way with the exception that the net
impacts are used rather than gross impacts. If a net-to-gross ratio is used to differentiate gross
savings from net savings, the revenue terms and the participant's bill terms will be related as
follows:
17
Chapter 4
Total Resource Cost Test6
Definition
The Total Resource Cost Test measures the net costs of a demand-side management program as
a resource option based on the total costs of the program, including both the participants' and
the utility's costs.
The test is applicable to conservation, load management, and fuel substitution programs. For
fuel substitution programs, the test measures the net effect of the impacts from the fuel not
chosen versus the impacts from the fuel that is chosen as a result of the program. TRC test
results for fuel substitution programs should be viewed as a measure of the economic efficiency
implications of the total energy supply system (gas and electric).
A variant on the TRC test is the Societal Test. The Societal Test differs from the TRC test in
that it includes the effects of externalities (e.g.,, environmental, national security), excludes tax
credit benefits, and uses a different (societal) discount rate.
Benefits and Costs: This test represents the combination of the effects of a program on both the
customers participating and those not participating in a program. In a sense, it is the summation
of the benefit and cost terms in the Participant and the Ratepayer Impact Measure tests, where
the revenue (bill) change and the incentive terms intuitively cancel (except for the differences in
net and gross savings).
The benefits calculated in the Total Resource Cost Test are the avoided supply costs, the
reduction in transmission, distribution, generation, and capacity costs valued at marginal cost for
the periods when there is a load reduction. The avoided supply costs should be calculated using
net program savings, savings net of changes in energy use that would have happened in the
absence of the program. For fuel substitution programs, benefits include the avoided device
costs and avoided supply costs for the energy, using equipment not chosen by the program
participant.
The costs in this test are the program costs paid by both the utility and the participants plus the
increase in supply costs for the periods in which load is increased. Thus all equipment costs,
installation, operation and maintenance, cost of removal (less salvage value), and administration
costs, no matter who pays for them, are included in this test. Any tax credits are considered a
reduction to costs in this test. For fuel substitution programs, the costs also include the increase
in supply costs for the utility providing the fuel that is chosen as a result of the program.
6
This test was previously called the All Ratepayers Test
18
How the Results Can be Expressed
The results of the Total Resource Cost Test can be expressed in several forms: as a net present
value, a benefit-cost ratio, or as a levelized cost. The net present value is the primary unit of
measurement for this test. Secondary means of expressing TRC test results are a benefit-cost
ratio and levelized costs. The Societal Test expressed in terms of net present value, a benefit-
cost ratio, or levelized costs is also considered a secondary means of expressing results.
Levelized costs as a unit of measurement are inapplicable for fuel substitution programs, since
these programs represent the net change of alternative fuels which are measured in different
physical units (e.g.,, kWh or therms). Levelized costs are also not applicable for load building
programs.
Net present value (NPVTRC) is the discounted value of the net benefits to this test over a
specified period of time. NPVTRC is a measure of the change in the total resource costs due to
the program. A net present value above zero indicates that the program is a less expensive
resource than the supply option upon which the marginal costs are based.
The benefit-cost ratio (BCRTRC) is the ratio of the discounted total benefits of the program to
the discounted total costs over some specified time period. It gives an indication of the rate of
return of this program to the utility and its ratepayers. A benefit-cost ratio above one indicates
that the program is beneficial to the utility and its ratepayers on a total resource cost basis.
The levelized cost is a measure of the total costs of the program in a form that is sometimes
used to estimate costs of utility-owned supply additions. It presents the total costs of the
program to the utility and its ratepayers on a per kilowatt, per kilowatt hour, or per therm basis
levelized over the life of the program.
The Societal Test is structurally similar to the Total Resource Cost Test. It goes beyond the
TRC test in that it attempts to quantify the change in the total resource costs to society as a
whole rather than to only the service territory (the utility and its ratepayers). In taking society's
perspective, the Societal Test utilizes essentially the same input variables as the TRC Test, but
they are defined with a broader societal point of view. More specifically, the Societal Test
differs from the TRC Test in at least one of five ways. First, the Societal Test may use higher
marginal costs than the TRC test if a utility faces marginal costs that are lower than other
utilities in the state or than its out-of-state suppliers. Marginal costs used in the Societal Test
would reflect the cost to society of the more expensive alternative resources. Second, tax credits
are treated as a transfer payment in the Societal Test, and thus are left out. Third, in the case of
capital expenditures, interest payments are considered a transfer payment since society actually
expends the resources in the first year. Therefore, capital costs enter the calculations in the year
in which they occur. Fourth, a societal discount rate should be used7. Finally, Marginal costs
used in the Societal Test would also contain externality costs of power generation not captured
by the market system. An illustrative and by no means exhaustive list of ‘externalities and their
components’ is given below (Refer to the Limitations section for elaboration.) These values are
also referred to as ‘adders’ designed to capture or internalize such externalities. The list of
potential adders would include for example:
1. The benefit of avoided environmental damage: The CPUC policy specifies two ‘adders’ to
internalize environmental externalities, one for electricity use and one for natural gas use.
Both are statewide average values. These adders are intended to help distinguish between
7 Many economists have pointed out that use of a market discount rate in social cost-benefit analysis
undervalues the interests of future generations. Yet if a market discount rate is not used, comparisons with
alternative investments are difficult to make.
19
cost-effective and non cost-effective energy-efficiency programs. They apply to an average
supply mix and would not be useful in distinguishing among competing supply options.
The CPUC electricity environmental adder is intended to account for the environmental
damage from air pollutant emissions from power plants. The CPUC-adopted adder is
intended to cover the human and material damage from sulfur oxides (SOX), nitrogen
oxides (NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOC, sometimes called reactive organic gases
or ROG), particulate matter at or below 10 micron diameter (PM10), and carbon. The adder
for natural gas is intended to account for air pollutant emissions from the direct combustion
of the gas. In the CPUC policy guidance, the adders are included in the tabulation of the
benefits of energy efficiency programs. They represent reduced environmental damage
from displaced electricity generation and avoided gas combustion. The environmental
damage is the result of the net change in pollutant emissions in the air basins, or regions, in
which there is an impact. This change is the result of direct changes in powerplant or
natural gas combustion emission resulting from the efficiency measures, and changes in
emissions from other sources, that result from those direct changes in emissions.
2. The benefit of avoided transmission and distribution costs – energy efficiency measures that
reduce the growth in peak demand would decrease the required rate of expansion to the
transmission and distribution network, eliminating costs of constructing and maintaining
new or upgraded lines.
3. The benefit of avoided generation costs – energy efficiency measures reduce consumption
and hence avoid the need for generation. This would include avoided energy costs, capacity
costs and T&D line
4. The benefit of increased system reliability: The reductions in demand and peak loads from
customers opting for self generation, provide reliability benefits to the distribution system in
the forms of:
a. Avoided costs of supply disruptions
b. Benefits to the economy of damage and control costs avoided by customers and
industries in the digital economy that need greater than 99.9 level of reliable electricity
service from the central grid
c. Marginally decreased System Operator’s costs to maintain a percentage reserve of
electricity supply above the instantaneous demand
d. Benefits to customers and the public of avoiding blackouts.
5. Non-energy benefits: Non-energy benefits might include a range of program-specific
benefits such as saved water in energy-efficient washing machines or self generation units,
reduced waste streams from an energy-efficient industrial process, etc.
6. Non-energy benefits for low income programs: The low income programs are social
programs which have a separate list of benefits included in what is known as the ‘low
income public purpose test’. This test and the sepcific benefits associated with this test are
outside the scope of this manual.
7. Benefits of fuel diversity include considerations of the risks of supply disruption, the effects
of price volatility, and the avoided costs of risk exposure and risk management.
20
extent supply-side project evaluations also include total costs of generation and/or transmission,
the TRC test provides a useful basis for comparing demand- and supply-side options.
Since this test treats incentives paid to participants and revenue shifts as transfer payments
(from all ratepayers to participants through increased revenue requirements), the test results are
unaffected by the uncertainties of projected average rates, thus reducing the uncertainty of the
test results. Average rates and assumptions associated with how other options are financed
(analogous to the issue of incentives for DSM programs) are also excluded from most supply-
side cost determinations, again making the TRC test useful for comparing demand-side and
supply-side options.
In addition, the costs of the DSM "resource" in the TRC test are based on the total costs of the
program, including costs incurred by the participant. Supply-side resource options are typically
based only on the costs incurred by the power suppliers.
Finally, the TRC test cannot be applied meaningfully to load building programs, thereby
limiting the ability to use this test to compare the full range of demand-side management
options.
Formulas
The formulas for the net present value (NPVTRC )' the benefit-cost ratio (BCRTRC and levelized
costs are presented below:
Where:
NPVTRC = Net present value of total costs of the resource
BCRTRC = Benefit-cost ratio of total costs of the resource
LCTRC = Levelized cost per unit of the total cost of the resource (cents per kWh for
conservation programs; dollars per kW for load management programs)
BTRC = Benefits of the program
CTRC = Costs of the program
LCRC = Total resource costs used for levelizing
IMP = Total discounted load impacts of the program
PCN = Net Participant Costs
The BTRC CTRC LCRC, and IMP terms are further defined as follows:
N
UAC t + TC t N
UAC at + PAC at
BTRC = ∑ + ∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
21
N
PRC t + PCN t + UIC t
CTRC = ∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
N
PRC t + PCN t − TC t
LCRC = ∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
n
n
IMP = ∑ (∑ ∆EN it ) or (∆DN it where I = peak period )
t =1 i =1
(1 + d ) t −1
The first summation in the BTRC equation should be used for conservation and load
management programs. For fuel substitution programs, both the first and second summations
should be used.
22
Chapter 5
Program Administrator Cost Test
Definition
The Program Administrator Cost Test measures the net costs of a demand-side management
program as a resource option based on the costs incurred by the program administrator
(including incentive costs) and excluding any net costs incurred by the participant. The benefits
are similar to the TRC benefits. Costs are defined more narrowly.
The costs for the Program Administrator Cost Test are the program costs incurred by the
administrator, the incentives paid to the customers, and the increased supply costs for the
periods in which load is increased. Administrator program costs include initial and annual costs,
such as the cost of utility equipment, operation and maintenance, installation, program
administration, and customer dropout and removal of equipment (less salvage value). For fuel
substitution programs, costs include the increased supply costs for the energy-using equipment
chosen by the program participant only in the case of a combination utility, as above.
In this test, revenue shifts are viewed as a transfer payment between participants and all
ratepayers. Though a shift in revenue affects rates, it does not affect revenue requirements,
which are defined as the difference between the net marginal energy and capacity costs avoided
and program costs. Thus, if NPVpa > 0 and NPVRIM < 0, the administrator’s overall total
costs will decrease, although rates may increase because the sales base over which revenue
requirements are spread has decreased.
Net present value (NPVpa) is the benefit of the program minus the administrator's costs,
discounted over some specified period of time. A net present value above zero indicates that this
demand-side program would decrease costs to the administrator and the utility.
The benefit-cost ratio (BCRpa) is the ratio of the total discounted benefits of a program to the
total discounted costs for a specified time period. A benefit-cost ratio above one indicates that
the program would benefit the combined administrator and utility's total cost situation.
23
The levelized cost is a measure of the costs of the program to the administrator in a form that is
sometimes used to estimate costs of utility-owned supply additions. It presents the costs of the
program to the administrator and the utility on per kilowatt, per kilowatt-hour, or per therm basis
levelized over the life of the program.
The Program Administrator Cost Test shares two limitations noted previously for the Total
Resource Cost test: (1) by treating revenue shifts as transfer payments, the rate impacts are not
captured, and (2) the test cannot be used to evaluate load building programs.
Formulas
The formulas for the net present value, the benefit-cost ratio and levelized cost are presented
below:
Where:
NPVpa Net present value of Program Administrator costs
BCRpa Benefit-cost ratio of Program Administrator costs
LCpa Levelized cost per unit of Program Administrator cost of the resource
Bpa Benefits of the program
Cpa Costs of the program
LCpc Total Program Administrator costs used for levelizing
N N
UAC t UAC at
B pa = ∑ + ∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
t +1 (1 + d )
t −1
N
PRC t + INC t + UIC t
C pa = ∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
24
N
PRC t + INC t
LCpc = ∑
t =1 (1 + d ) t −1
The first summation in the Bpa equation should be used for conservation and load management
programs. For fuel substitution programs, both the first and second summations should be
used.
25