The Battle of Marawi (Filipino: Labanan sa Marawi), also known as the Siege of

Marawi (Filipino: Pagkubkob sa Marawi)[44] and the Marawi crisis (Filipino: Krisis sa Marawi),[45] was
a five-month-long armed conflict in Marawi, Lanao del Sur, Philippines, that started on 23 May 2017,
between Philippine government security forces and militants affiliated with the Islamic State of Iraq
and the Levant (ISIL), including the Maute and Abu Sayyaf Salafi jihadist groups.[46] The battle also
became the longest urban battle in the modern history of the Philippines.[33]
According to the Philippine government, the clashes began during an offensive in Marawi to
capture Isnilon Hapilon, the leader of the ISIL-affiliated Abu Sayyaf group, after receiving reports that
Hapilon was in the city, possibly to meet with militants of the Maute group.[47][48] A deadly firefight
erupted when Hapilon's forces opened fire on the combined Army and police teams and called for
reinforcements from the Maute group, an armed group that pledged allegiance to the Islamic
State and which is believed to be responsible for the 2016 Davao City bombing, according to military
spokesmen.[49]
Maute group militants attacked Camp Ranao and occupied several buildings in the city, including
Marawi City Hall, Mindanao State University, a hospital and the city jail.[49] They also occupied the
main street and set fire to Saint Mary's Cathedral, Ninoy Aquino School and Dansalan College, run
by the United Church of Christ in the Philippines (UCCP).[47][50] The militants also took a priest and
several churchgoers hostage.[51]
The Armed Forces of the Philippines stated that some of the terrorists were foreigners who had been
in the country for a long time, offering support to the Maute group in Marawi. Their main objective
was to raise an ISIL flag at the Lanao del Sur Provincial Capitol and declare a wilayat or provincial
ISIL territory in Lanao del Sur.[52][53]
On 17 October 2017, the day after the deaths of militant leaders Omar Maute and Isnilon
Hapilon, President Duterte declared Marawi was "liberated from terrorist influence".[54] Then on 23
October 2017, Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana announced that the five-month battle against the
terrorists in Marawi had finally ended.[55]

WASHINGTON — Among the corporate titans recognized last week by President Trump
during a White House signing ceremony for his China trade deal was Sanjay Mehrotra,
the chief executive of Micron Technology, whose Idaho semiconductor company is at the
heart of Mr. Trump’s trade war.

Micron, which makes memory chips for computers and smartphones, is precisely the
kind of advanced technology company that the Trump administration views as crucial to
maintaining a competitive edge over China. After Micron rebuffed a 2015 takeover
attempt by a Chinese state-owned company, it watched with disbelief as its innovations
were stolen and copied by a Chinese competitor and its business was blocked from
China.

China’s treatment of American companies like Micron fed Mr. Trump’s decision to
unleash a punishing trade war with the world’s second-largest economy, a fight he said
would halt Beijing’s use of unfair practices to undermine the United States. But that
two-year conflagration may wind up being more damaging to American technology
companies.

The initial trade deal announced last week should make operating in China easier for
companies like Micron. The deal contains provisions meant to protect American
technology and trade secrets and allow companies to challenge China on accusations of
theft, including older cases like Micron’s that precede the agreement.
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story

But Mr. Trump’s aggressive trade approach has also accelerated a technology arms race
between the two countries, putting American companies like Micron at risk as the two
nations try to decouple their economies. In an effort to reduce its reliance on American
components, China has expedited efforts to produce its own semiconductors, driverless
cars, artificial intelligence and other technologies. Those efforts, along with the Trump
administration’s desire to restrict the sales of American tech products to China, could
hurt the very companies Mr. Trump set out to protect.

“Let’s be clear, the trade war has been very bad for the semiconductor industry in
several ways,” said Robert D. Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and
Innovation Foundation, a think tank funded by the tech industry. “It’s like China woke
up and said, ‘We’ve relied too much on the United States.’”

 Unlock more free articles.

Create an account or log in

The trade deal does nothing to curtail China’s use of subsidies, industrial plans and
state-owned companies, which have helped it build formidable industries in steel, wind
turbines and solar panels. Those state-directed efforts, which put many American
manufacturers out of business, are now being harnessed for high-tech industries.

The Trump administration is constructing its own walls around American technology,
reducing access to the lucrative Chinese market out of security concerns. It is restricting
exports of sensitive technologies, barring sales to certain Chinese
companies and blocking Chinese entities from investing in the United States.

The administration is considering further restricting sales to Huawei, the Chinese

telecom company that relies on components from Micron and other American suppliers.
And the China trade deal leaves tariffs on more than $360 billion in Chinese goods in
place as Mr. Trump tries to push American companies to bring manufacturing back
home.
Editors’ Picks

A Meticulous Account of Trump’s Tenure Reads Like a Comic Horror Story

 Can ‘Star Trek’ Chart a Way Forward?

Why Do Trump Supporters Support Trump?

Continue reading the main story

ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story
Semiconductor sales to China, which represent more than half the global chip demand,
have fallen, and semiconductor stocks have been whipsawed by the trade war.

Image
Sanjay Mehrotra, chief executive of Micron Technology. The company sells chips to the
Chinese telecom giant Huawei, which was blacklisted as part of Mr. Trump’s fight with
China.Credit...Takaaki Iwabu/Bloomberg

Mr. Trump and his supporters say that conflict is no longer avoidable, and that the
president’s unconventional approach is necessary to take on a growing threat from
China. Officials across the administration look with suspicion on Chinese industrial
plans, including Made in China 2025, which called for $300 billion in financing and
other support for 10 advanced industries, including semiconductors.

American officials worry that gaining an advantage in semiconductors would give China
both a commercial and military edge.

Chips, which serve as the tiny sensors, brains and memories of all high-tech devices, are
crucial to next-generation telecom networks, supercomputers, artificial intelligence and
driverless cars, as well as military ships, satellites and aircraft. They are also one of the
United States’ largest exports, along with airplanes, oil and cars.

While China’s ability to make chips is still far behind the United States’, the Chinese
government, its state-owned enterprises, and provincial and private equity funds have
been pumping billions of dollars into the industry, particularly the kind of memory chips
that Micron makes. In areas where Chinese companies cannot develop or buy
technology, companies say, some will simply steal their intellectual property.
For the Trump administration, which was looking for a fight with China, Micron’s story
proved a formative one. As officials prepared an investigation into Chinese intellectual
property theft that would ultimately spiral into the trade war, Micron provided a
“camera ready” case that fit everything the administration was looking for, one industry
executive said.