Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15
⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦
⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐
⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐
REPOR T ON
EPORT
THE ACTIVITIES OF
⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟼⟎
⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟏⟼⟎⟧⟦⟐⟼⟎
INTRODUCTION
“Shola” is an ancient Tamil word found in the oldest Sangam literature. Today, it
applies to evergreen montane tropical or subtropical natural rainforests growing
at an altitude higher than 1,500 metres above sea level, mostly along the Western
Ghats. Their hallmarks are an extraordinary biodiversity of both flora and fauna
(the result of a million-year-long evolution), and a considerable capacity to retain
rain water and discharge it throughout the year, which makes them ideal natural
reservoirs.
Shola forests were very extensive
in the Nilgiris until British policies
of converting them into man-made
plantations (eucalyptus, acacia,
cypress) and tea plantations made
huge inroads into them. This
shrinking process has been halted
only in recent decades, when the
irreplaceable value of these forests
became finally understood and the
urgency to protect what is left of
them increasingly recognized. But
this understanding often came very
late, as species of Shola trees have a
very slow growth rate (typically five
to ten years for three metres,
depending on local conditions),
and their regeneration is therefore
a great challenge, vulnerable as
they are to human interference of
many kinds and the faster growth of
exotic species.
LSWC Report / May 1998 – November 2001 / p. 2
From the early 1980s, Michel Danino, a French scholar and author at the nearby
Mother’s Institute of Research, waged a lonely battle to protect the forest from
unchecked depredations. Intervention by the Tamil Nadu Forest Department also
helped control the ravage, but the situation tended to relapse periodically.
On 2 May 1998, the Forest Department constituted the LONGWOOD SHOLA
WATCHDOG COMMITTEE (LSWC) in order to assist it in the challenging task of
protecting this endangered forest. The committee consists of a few concerned
citizens of Kotagiri ; among the more active members are M. Balamurugan (a
headmaster in a T. N. Government school), K. J. Raju (a mathematics teacher in
a Central Government school and a social worker), Michael Ezekiel (a music
teacher and a social worker), and Michel Danino. Despite their own heavy
LSWC Report / May 1998 – November 2001 / p. 4
This was the area that called for the most urgent attention. Several methods were
adopted to put a stop to man-made destruction of this forest.
Patrolling : LSWC members conducted frequent patrols (including occasional
joint patrolling with the local Forest staff). They intercepted and confronted
dozens of woodcutters, driving them out after seizing ropes or machetes, or
handing them over to the Forest Department in the more serious cases. Even
mere collection of fallen dead wood was strictly disallowed, as experience had
shown that this concession encouraged many to break hundreds of young trees
by hand and collect them later once they had dried up.
Persistent and systematic
rounds soon paid off as word
spread. Within just a year, wood
collection and cutting was down
by at least ninety percent. For
the first time in decades, fresh
stumps of young or medium-
sized trees became a rarity ; fallen
logs could be seen lying on the
main pathways for weeks or
months, whereas they previously
disappeared in days.
The immediate reward has been a massive spontaneous growth of regenera-
tion, which can be seen in almost all open and degraded parts of Longwood
Shola, especially the fringe areas preferred by depredators.
From the start, LSWC realized that physical protection, however important, can
only remain a short-term solution. Only the collaboration of nearby villagers and
town inhabitants can ensure a long-lasting protection. LSWC has conducted
several programmes to try and secure this collaboration.
In November 1998, LSWC printed and got distributed throughout Kotagiri a
public appeal (4,000 copies in both Tamil and English ; the English version is
reproduced overleaf).
This notice invited the
people’s collaboration in
saving this forest which
is contributing so much
water to many nearby
villages including Kotagiri
town.
LSWC conducted
meetings and awareness
camps in nearby villages,
intended not only to
LSWC Report / May 1998 – November 2001 / p. 7
3. ECO-SEMINARS
Even more importantly, the teaching and student community must be the target
of any sustained environmental effort, since that is where the seeds of future atti-
tudes towards Nature can be sown. LSWC has been particularly active on this front,
and has guided into Longwood Shola dozens of visiting groups of students from
Kotagiri, Coonoor, Ooty,
Coimbatore, Erode,
Chennai, Madurai, etc.,
explaining the unique
Shola eco-system and the
importance of its preser-
vation. Two ten-day NSS
camps have also taken
place at Longwood Shola
(with two more sched-
uled in December 2001),
and a Polytechnic Col-
lege of Kotagiri has
adopted it as part of its
ecological activities. Altogether, over 1,500 students have visited Longwood Shola
and many of them have got first-hand experience of the working of the Shola eco-
system and of practical tasks such as removal of exotics, clearing of unwanted
waste, repairing of the fence, etc. Many of these programmes were reported in the
local English and Tamil press (a few articles are reproduced overleaf over the next
three pages).
Moreover, LSWC has reached out directly to hundreds of headmasters and teach-
ers, securing their collaboration in spreading the message of Nature preservation.
Among the numerous programmes involving students and teachers, 35 of the
chief programmes are briefly given below (chronologically) :
LSWC Report / May 1998 – November 2001 / p. 10
Much has been achieved in just over three years, the most important being that
the forest is now well protected and awareness of its precious contribution to the
region has spread. However, for an experiment such as LSWC to be fully success-
ful, several weak areas need to be addressed :
F UEL R EQUIREMENTS : Unless the villagers’ long-term fuel requirements are
addressed, there is always a risk of their falling back on the Shola forests for fire-
wood. LSWC tried to secure gas connections for the people living in the vicinity
of the Shola, but failed owing to poor cooperation from LPG dealers and insuffi-
cient groundwork. Yet such an arrangement — even connections subsidized by
the Government for hill areas — is an urgent necessity. In the meantime, LSWC
has convinced villagers still dependent on firewood to turn to eucalyptus or
acacia (wattle) plantations and draw from them reasonable quantities. Such plan-
tations are found around Longwood Shola and are therefore precious buffers.
LSWC has also requested the Forest Department to open subsidised firewood
depots in surrounding villages, as the main depot located in the town cannot
meet the demand.
THREAT TO BIRD LIFE : Longwood Shola is famous for its rich bird life. Dozens of
species, some of them rare, can be found. But in recent years, they have been
under growing threat from multiplying jungle crows. Crows are actually the town’s
chief scavengers and have been thriving on its rapid expansion. They have
invaded the nearby Longwood Shola, and at every nesting season can be seen
raiding many nests and carrying away the chicks, sometimes with the parents in
hot pursuit. From the tiny white-eye to the jungle fowl, with the bulbul and the
blackbird in between, no species is spared. This is not a “natural” predation but
one that has been growing in proportion to the human population, which
remains the chief feeder of crows. It has led to a sharp decrease in the bird popu-
lation in the last ten or fifteen years, noticeable to bird watchers accustomed to
Longwood Shola. Several species spotted twenty years ago can no longer be seen.
The situation might become irreversible in a few years. But no effective solution
has been found so far to tackle it.
REPLICATION OF THE WATCHDOG COMMITTEE MODEL : Insofar as LSWC offers a viable
model of joint forest management involving both the Forest department and local
citizens, its replication to other areas of the Nilgiris and beyond is a necessity. So
far LSWC has worked mostly in preparing its ground. But it is now trying to
LSWC Report / May 1998 – November 2001 / p. 14
encourage areas of the Nilgiris with similar situations to draw from its experience.
Recently a watchdog committee was started at Banagudi Shola, and work is on
to organize one at Konavakorai. However much more needs to be done in this
area, and farther afield.
CONCLUSION
The result of these first three years is certainly encouraging. It shows that a cor-
dial and fruitful collaboration between the Forest Department and the public is not
only desirable, but the only workable solution to complex conservation problems
caused by a high population density still largely dependent on firewood for fuel,
a general ignorance of the limits to Nature’s bounty, and a polity where protec-
tion of Nature often becomes a casualty of politics and other short-sighted con-
siderations.
Such a collaboration demands sincere efforts both from the Forest Depart-
ment, often too slow to react and bound by antiquated rules and approaches to
Nature, and from the public, often too prompt to complain about the state of
affairs and offer armchair advice but little physical involvement. Such a shared
sincerity has been the key to the success of the Longwood Shola experiment, a
success that needs to be strengthened and built upon.