You are on page 1of 2

Nakajima, S. et al.

Development Report:

The Possibility and Challenges for Deaf-Blind Individuals


to Enjoy Films in Theater
Sawako Nakajima∗1 , Naoyuki Okochi∗2 , Naoko Iizumi∗3 , Motohiko Tsuru∗4 ,
Kazutaka Mitobe∗1 , and Tetsujiro Yamagami∗5
∗1 Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University
1-1 Tegatagakuen-machi, Akita-city, Akita 010-8502, Japan
∗2 Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo

4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan


∗3 Department of Advanced Studies in Anthropology, National Museum of Ethnology

10-1 Senri Expo Park, Suita, Osaka 565-8511, Japan


∗4 Social Welfare Corporation, Yuukari

1005 Okanohara-cho, Kagoshima-city, Kagoshima 891-1201, Japan


∗5 Media Access Support Center, NPO

2-9-1 Chuo, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-0011, Japan


E-mail: nakajima@ie.akita-u.ac.jp
[Received May 20, 2016; accepted December 12, 2016]

In recent times, the use of subtitles and audio descrip- sual and hearing disabilities is approximately 14,000 [1].
tions in movies for individuals with either hearing or Twenty-five years have passed since social support was
visual impairment and the need to develop systems to provided to deaf-blind individuals. Act on Compre-
provide these have been realized. However, even the hensive Support for Persons with Disabilities of April
need and possibility for deaf-blind individuals to enjoy 2013 legally provided new welfare measures for deaf-
movies have not been discussed yet. This study created blind individuals, including the necessity for interpreters
an environment for deaf-blind individuals to “watch” and caregivers. Through the process, the living condi-
a film, and conducted a screening of feature-length tions of deaf-blind individuals are better understood, e.g.,
films with subtitles and audio descriptions. Interviews these individuals rarely leave home. There are challenges
of 26 deaf-blind individuals indicated that 56% had for deaf-blind individuals to participate socially, and the
watched films in a theater after becoming deaf-blind ability to socialize ensures a wholesome and cultured
and before the screening session. When watching the life [1, 2]. However, most of the leisure and art works
films, 26.9% of participants used individual monitor- are interpreted by visual and hearing perception. Thus,
ing devices, headphones, or other conventional video deaf-blind individuals have been discouraged to appreci-
or audio equipment. Furthermore, 50% were able ate leisure and arts. Prior studies include a case study on
to use either subtitles or audio descriptions. Regard- education for deaf-blind individuals [3] and basic research
less of their impairment conditions, participants re- on brain function of tactile language communication [4].
sponded positively towards watching the film in the Support technologies for deaf-blind individuals include
screening session. Among the deaf-blind, 42.1% of the the study and development of communication support [5];
partially sighted and deaf, blind and hard of hearing, a robot with mechanical fingerspelling hands [6]; a glove
and partially sighted and hard of hearing individuals translating the alphabet Lorm [7]; Braille pin displays
appreciated a special aspect of the theater, i.e., “shar- and finger Braille interface using vibration motors and
ing an opportunity and communication with others.” piezoelectric actuators [8–10]; and an application soft-
ware conveying Braille using the touchscreen and vibra-
tion on a versatile mobile terminal [11]. There are also
non-verbal communication support devices, such as back-
Keywords: people with visual and hearing impairments, channel feedback vibration devices to support dialogue
deaf-blindness, watching films, leisure, information sup- for deaf-blind individuals [12], and a device that facili-
port tates remote interpersonal communication with touch by
converting hand pressure into vibrational intensity [13].
In the field of broadcasting, a system to provide real time
1. Background information by closed captioning of news and drama us-
ing Braille or a finger Braille interface has been devel-
Currently in Japan, the number of deaf-blind individu- oped [14]. For support of daily living, there are transit
als who have a physical disability certificate for both vi- support devices [15, 16], a human position information

350 Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence Vol.21 No.2, 2017


and Intelligent Informatics
The Challenges for Deaf-Blind Individuals to Enjoy Films

presentation device [17], and a haptic alarm clock [18]. tially sighted and deaf group); five who were blind with
However, there are few studies that include support for hard of hearing (blind and hard of hearing group); and
deaf-blind individuals to enjoy leisure, such as a singing five who had partial sight and hard of hearing (partially
training device [19]. sighted and hard of hearing group).
Focusing on individuals with a single visual or hearing
impairments, the authors have investigated actual condi-
tions of watching films in the theater [20, 21]. People 2.1.2. Films Watched
with visual and hearing impairments may have a desire We conducted our research in a condition with mini-
to watch films just as those without visual or hearing im- mum stress. We chose two films that we thought the par-
pairments. We concluded that individuals with visual and ticipants would be interested in, and asked them to choose
hearing impairments can enjoy films if improved subti- the film they wanted to watch. This choice allowed the
tles and audio descriptions are developed [22]. Not only participants to maintain their motivation for watching the
watching and listening environments for those with visual film. We evaluated the participants’ reactions to the film-
or hearing impairments have been developed, but also the watching experience. To avoid differences between films
effectiveness has been measured and evaluated [23, 24]. in terms of the information acquisition method used by
In addition, development of a conveyance method of non- participants, we chose the following two films which had
verbal information, such as voice volume and intonation, comparatively standard amounts of subtitles and audio de-
which are difficult to convey verbally [25], and the prac- scriptions.
tical use of the technologies to present subtitles and audio
descriptions in the theater [26]. However, support for in- • “Planet of Snail” (Korean documentary film; approx-
dividuals with visual and hearing impairments to watch imately 87 minutes; Director, Seung-jun Yi; Pro-
films has not been provided. The combination of deaf- vision, Siglo; Distribution, Media Access Support
ness and blindness is uniquely different from a single im- Center).
pairment [2], and requires that the communication method
• “Dolphin Blue, Fuji, to the Sky Again” (Japanese
be chosen to meet the specific needs of the individual.
For example, finger Braille, Braille, tactile sign language, film; approximately 105 minutes; Director, Tetsu
partially sighted sign language, mechanical fingerspelling Maeda; Production, “Dolphin Blue” Production
hands, handwriting, writing, and voice [1]. Complexity Committee).
and modality vary depending on the onset and the impair- Both films provided subtitles (for talking as well as en-
ment [27]. It can be difficult to provide appropriate sup- vironmental sounds, sound effects, and music) for peo-
port for deaf-blind individuals. We believe that the abil- ple with hearing impairment and audio descriptions for
ity of deaf-blind individuals to watch a film in a theater the visually impaired. Participants chose the film(s) they
will provide a range of leisure activities and an opportu- wanted to watch: 12 participants watched “Planet of
nity to facilitate social participation. First, we will discuss Snail,” 17 chose “Dolphin Blue,” and three watched both
the possibilities and challenges for deaf-blind individuals films.
to watch films in the theater. We previously conducted a
film screening with a Japanese film of 105 minutes and
a non-Japanese film (Korean film with a theme of deaf- 2.1.3. Building an Environment for Watching the Film
blind) of 87 minutes. Both films had subtitles and audio
(1) Selection and setting of information acquisition
descriptions. We built a facility in a theater for deaf-blind
method
individuals to watch films in the theater. We interviewed
participants after the film session. We evaluated and an- After arriving at the site, the participants selected their
alyzed the conditions as participants watched a film, how seat, with help from the interpreting helper and the screen-
they obtained information as they watched the film, and ing session staff. After sitting, they selected the informa-
their reactions to the film-watching experience. tion acquisition method for watching the film from among
the following three methods:

2. Research Targeting the Deaf-Blind • Interpretation by an interpreting helper

2.1. Method • Use of auxiliary video and sound equipment, such as


individual monitoring devices and headphones
2.1.1. Participants in Research
• Watching with their own vision and hearing
A total of 26 people who were deaf-blind (16 males and
10 females) participated in the screening sessions and our Based on the selected method, we connected and set up
research. Their average age was 56.3 (standard deviation the auxiliary video and sound equipment, and adjusted the
12.1). Self-reports describing their impairment revealed outputs.
the following four groups: seven individuals who were
completely deaf and blind (completely deaf-blind group); (2) Adjustment of seat position and provision of auxil-
nine individuals who had partial sight and were deaf (par- iary table

Vol.21 No.2, 2017 Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence 351


and Intelligent Informatics

You might also like