Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fujipress JACIII-21-2 - 23 Preview
Fujipress JACIII-21-2 - 23 Preview
Development Report:
In recent times, the use of subtitles and audio descrip- sual and hearing disabilities is approximately 14,000 [1].
tions in movies for individuals with either hearing or Twenty-five years have passed since social support was
visual impairment and the need to develop systems to provided to deaf-blind individuals. Act on Compre-
provide these have been realized. However, even the hensive Support for Persons with Disabilities of April
need and possibility for deaf-blind individuals to enjoy 2013 legally provided new welfare measures for deaf-
movies have not been discussed yet. This study created blind individuals, including the necessity for interpreters
an environment for deaf-blind individuals to “watch” and caregivers. Through the process, the living condi-
a film, and conducted a screening of feature-length tions of deaf-blind individuals are better understood, e.g.,
films with subtitles and audio descriptions. Interviews these individuals rarely leave home. There are challenges
of 26 deaf-blind individuals indicated that 56% had for deaf-blind individuals to participate socially, and the
watched films in a theater after becoming deaf-blind ability to socialize ensures a wholesome and cultured
and before the screening session. When watching the life [1, 2]. However, most of the leisure and art works
films, 26.9% of participants used individual monitor- are interpreted by visual and hearing perception. Thus,
ing devices, headphones, or other conventional video deaf-blind individuals have been discouraged to appreci-
or audio equipment. Furthermore, 50% were able ate leisure and arts. Prior studies include a case study on
to use either subtitles or audio descriptions. Regard- education for deaf-blind individuals [3] and basic research
less of their impairment conditions, participants re- on brain function of tactile language communication [4].
sponded positively towards watching the film in the Support technologies for deaf-blind individuals include
screening session. Among the deaf-blind, 42.1% of the the study and development of communication support [5];
partially sighted and deaf, blind and hard of hearing, a robot with mechanical fingerspelling hands [6]; a glove
and partially sighted and hard of hearing individuals translating the alphabet Lorm [7]; Braille pin displays
appreciated a special aspect of the theater, i.e., “shar- and finger Braille interface using vibration motors and
ing an opportunity and communication with others.” piezoelectric actuators [8–10]; and an application soft-
ware conveying Braille using the touchscreen and vibra-
tion on a versatile mobile terminal [11]. There are also
non-verbal communication support devices, such as back-
Keywords: people with visual and hearing impairments, channel feedback vibration devices to support dialogue
deaf-blindness, watching films, leisure, information sup- for deaf-blind individuals [12], and a device that facili-
port tates remote interpersonal communication with touch by
converting hand pressure into vibrational intensity [13].
In the field of broadcasting, a system to provide real time
1. Background information by closed captioning of news and drama us-
ing Braille or a finger Braille interface has been devel-
Currently in Japan, the number of deaf-blind individu- oped [14]. For support of daily living, there are transit
als who have a physical disability certificate for both vi- support devices [15, 16], a human position information
presentation device [17], and a haptic alarm clock [18]. tially sighted and deaf group); five who were blind with
However, there are few studies that include support for hard of hearing (blind and hard of hearing group); and
deaf-blind individuals to enjoy leisure, such as a singing five who had partial sight and hard of hearing (partially
training device [19]. sighted and hard of hearing group).
Focusing on individuals with a single visual or hearing
impairments, the authors have investigated actual condi-
tions of watching films in the theater [20, 21]. People 2.1.2. Films Watched
with visual and hearing impairments may have a desire We conducted our research in a condition with mini-
to watch films just as those without visual or hearing im- mum stress. We chose two films that we thought the par-
pairments. We concluded that individuals with visual and ticipants would be interested in, and asked them to choose
hearing impairments can enjoy films if improved subti- the film they wanted to watch. This choice allowed the
tles and audio descriptions are developed [22]. Not only participants to maintain their motivation for watching the
watching and listening environments for those with visual film. We evaluated the participants’ reactions to the film-
or hearing impairments have been developed, but also the watching experience. To avoid differences between films
effectiveness has been measured and evaluated [23, 24]. in terms of the information acquisition method used by
In addition, development of a conveyance method of non- participants, we chose the following two films which had
verbal information, such as voice volume and intonation, comparatively standard amounts of subtitles and audio de-
which are difficult to convey verbally [25], and the prac- scriptions.
tical use of the technologies to present subtitles and audio
descriptions in the theater [26]. However, support for in- • “Planet of Snail” (Korean documentary film; approx-
dividuals with visual and hearing impairments to watch imately 87 minutes; Director, Seung-jun Yi; Pro-
films has not been provided. The combination of deaf- vision, Siglo; Distribution, Media Access Support
ness and blindness is uniquely different from a single im- Center).
pairment [2], and requires that the communication method
• “Dolphin Blue, Fuji, to the Sky Again” (Japanese
be chosen to meet the specific needs of the individual.
For example, finger Braille, Braille, tactile sign language, film; approximately 105 minutes; Director, Tetsu
partially sighted sign language, mechanical fingerspelling Maeda; Production, “Dolphin Blue” Production
hands, handwriting, writing, and voice [1]. Complexity Committee).
and modality vary depending on the onset and the impair- Both films provided subtitles (for talking as well as en-
ment [27]. It can be difficult to provide appropriate sup- vironmental sounds, sound effects, and music) for peo-
port for deaf-blind individuals. We believe that the abil- ple with hearing impairment and audio descriptions for
ity of deaf-blind individuals to watch a film in a theater the visually impaired. Participants chose the film(s) they
will provide a range of leisure activities and an opportu- wanted to watch: 12 participants watched “Planet of
nity to facilitate social participation. First, we will discuss Snail,” 17 chose “Dolphin Blue,” and three watched both
the possibilities and challenges for deaf-blind individuals films.
to watch films in the theater. We previously conducted a
film screening with a Japanese film of 105 minutes and
a non-Japanese film (Korean film with a theme of deaf- 2.1.3. Building an Environment for Watching the Film
blind) of 87 minutes. Both films had subtitles and audio
(1) Selection and setting of information acquisition
descriptions. We built a facility in a theater for deaf-blind
method
individuals to watch films in the theater. We interviewed
participants after the film session. We evaluated and an- After arriving at the site, the participants selected their
alyzed the conditions as participants watched a film, how seat, with help from the interpreting helper and the screen-
they obtained information as they watched the film, and ing session staff. After sitting, they selected the informa-
their reactions to the film-watching experience. tion acquisition method for watching the film from among
the following three methods: