Nama : Ratna Puspitasari

NPM : 20187279089
Kelas : 2B
Dosen : Dr. Mamiek Suendarti, M.Pd

 Bab 2 Latihan Hal. 12

2-15. The diameter of a ball bearing was measured by 12 inspectors, each using two different
kinds of calipers. The results were.

Inspectors Caliper 1 Caliper 2

1 0.265 0.264
2 0.265 0.265
3 0.266 0.264
4 0.267 0.266
5 0.267 0.267
6 0.265 0.268
7 0.267 0.264
8 0.267 0.265
9 0.265 0.265
10 0.268 0.267
11 0.268 0.268
12 0.265 0.269
(a) Is there a significant difference between the means of the population of measurements
from which the two samples were selected? Use 𝛼 = 0.05
(b) Find the P-value for the test in part (a).
(c) Construct a 95 percent confidence interval on the difference in mean diameter
measurements for the two types of calipers.
Jawab:
Input SPSS :

No. A Y
1 1 .265
2 1 .265
3 1 .266
4 1 .267
5 1 .267
6 1 .265
7 1 .267
8 1 .267
9 1 .265
10 1 .268
11 1 .268
12 1 .265 Keterangan :
13 2 .264
A : Cliper
14 2 .265
15 2 .264 Y : Diameter of ball bearing
16 2 .266
17 2 .267
18 2 .268
19 2 .264
20 2 .265
21 2 .265
22 2 .267
23 2 .268
24 2 .269

Output SPSS:
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N

1 Caliper 1 12
Caliper
2 Caliper 2 12

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: The diameter of a ball bearing
Source Type III Sum of Df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
Corrected Model 3.750E-007a 1 3.750E-007 .164 .689
Intercept 1.700 1 1.700 744164.940 .000
A 3.750E-007 1 3.750E-007 .164 .689
Error 5.025E-005 22 2.284E-006
Total 1.700 24
Corrected Total 5.062E-005 23
a. R Squared = .007 (Adjusted R Squared = -.038)

Analisis Data
Hipotesis Statistik
H0 : μ A = μ B
H0 : μ A ≠ μ B
Hipotesis Penelitian

H0 : Terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Caliper terhadap Diameter of Ball bearing
H1 : Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Caliper terhadap Diameter of Ball bearing

Hasil Statistik
Nilai F0 = 0,164 dan Sig = 0,689 > 0,05. Dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa
terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Caliper terhadap Diameter of Ball bearing.

2-19. In semiconductor manufacturing wet chemical etching is often used to remove silicon from
the backs of wafers prior to metalization. The etch rate is an important characteristic of this
process. Two different etching solutions are being evaluated. Eight randomly selected
wafers have been etched in each solution and the observed etch rates are shown below.

Solution 1 Solution 2
9.9 10.2
9.4 10.0
10.0 10.7
10.3 10.5
10.6 10.6
10.3 10.2
 9.3 10.4
9.8 10.3
(a) Do the data indicate that the claim that both solutions have the same mean etch rate is
valid? Use 𝛼 = 0.05 and assume equal variances.
(b) Find a 95 percent confidence interval on the difference in mean etch rates.
(c) Use normal probability plots to investigate the adequacy of the assumptions of normality
and equal variances.

Jawab:
Input SPSS :

No. A Y
1 1 9.9
2 1 9.4
3 1 10.0
4 1 10.3
5 1 10.6
6 1 10.3
7 1 9.3 Keterangan :
8 1 9.8
9 2 10.2 A : Solution
10 2 10.0
Y : Semiconductor manufacturing
11 2 10.7
12 2 10.5
13 2 10.6
14 2 10.2
15 2 10.4
16 2 10.3

Output SPSS :

Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N

1 Solution 1 8
Solution
2 Solution 2 8

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Semiconductor

Source Type III Sum of Df Mean Square F Sig.

Squares
 Corrected Model ,681a 1 ,681 5,297 ,037
Intercept 1650,391 1 1650,391 12845,292 ,000
A ,681 1 ,681 5,297 ,037
Error 1,799 14 ,128
Total 1652,870 16
Corrected Total 2,479 15

a. R Squared = ,275 (Adjusted R Squared = ,223)

Analisis Data
Hipotesis Statistik
H0 : μ A = μ B
H1 : μA ≠ μB

Hipotesis Penelitian
H0 : Terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Solution terhadap Semiconductor
H1 : Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Solution terhadap Semiconductor
Hasil Statistik
Nilai F0 = 5,297 dan Sig = 0,037 < 0,05. Dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa
terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Solution terhadap Semiconductor.
 Bab 3 Latihan Hal. 20
3-13 Four chemists are asked to determine the percentage of methyl alcohol in a certain chemical
compound. Each chemist makes three determinations, and the results are the following.

Chemists Percentage of Methyl Alcohol

1 84.99 84.04 84.38
2 85.15 85.13 84.88
3 84.72 84.48 85.16
4 84.20 84.10 84.55

(a) Do chemists differ significantly ? use 𝛼 = 0.05

(b) Analyze the residuals from this experiment
(c) If chemist 2 is a employee, construct a meaningful set of orthogonal contracts that
might have been useful at the start of the experimen
Jawab :

Input SPSS :

No A Y
1. 1 84.99
2. 1 84.04
3. 1 84.38
4. 2 85.15
5. 2 85.13 Keterangan :
6. 2 84.88
7. 3 84.72 A : Compound
8. 3 84.48 Y : Precentage of methyl alcohol
9. 3 85.16
10. 4 84.20
11. 4 84.10
12. 4 84.55

Output SPSS:

Between-Subjects Factors
N

1 3

2 3
Chemical
3 3

4 3
 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Precentage of methyl alcohol

Source Type III Sum of Df Mean Square F Sig.

Squares

Corrected Model 1.045a 3 .348 3.246 .081

Intercept 85984.084 1 85984.084 801529.565 .000
A 1.045 3 .348 3.246 .081
Error .858 8 .107
Total 85985.987 12
Corrected Total 1.903 11

a. R Squared = .549 (Adjusted R Squared = .380)

Analisis data
Hipotesis Statistik
𝐻0 : 𝜇𝐴 = 𝜇𝐵 = 𝜇𝐶 = 𝜇𝐷
𝐻1 : Bukan 𝐻0

Hipotesis Penelitian
H0 : Terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan dari methyl alcohol terhadap chemical compound.
H1 : Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dari methyl alcohol terhadap chemical compound.
Hasil statistik :
Nilai F0 = 3.246 dan sig. = 0.081. dikatakan signifikan apabila nilai Sig. < 0,05
Dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan dari methyl
alcohol terhadap chemical compound.

3. 15 Four catalysts that may affect the concentration of one component in a three component
liquid mixture are being investigated. The following concentrations are obtained.

Catalyst
1 2 3 4
58.2 56.3 50.1 52.5
57.2 54.5 54.2 49.9
58.4 57.0 55.4 50.0
55.8 55.3 51.7
54.9
 (a) Do the four catalysts have the same effect on the concentration ?
(b) Analyze the residuals from this experiment
(c) Construct a 99 percent confidence interval estimate of the mean response for catalyst 1.

Jawab :

Input SPSS :

No A Y
1. 1 58.2
2. 1 57.2
3. 1 58.4
4. 1 55.8
5. 1 54.9 Keterangan :
6. 2 56.3
7. 2 54.5 A : Catalysts
8. 2 57.0 Y : Concentration of one
9. 2 55.3 component in a three- component
10. 3 50.1 liquid
11. 3 54.2
12. 3 55.4
13. 4 52.9
14. 4 49.9
15. 4 50.0
16. 4 51.7

Output SPSS :
Between-Subjects Factors
N

1 5

2 4
Catalyst
3 3

4 4

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Concentration

Source Type III Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.

Squares

Corrected Model 85.676a 3 28.559 9.916 .001

Intercept 45584.001 1 45584.001 15827.015 .000
A 85.676 3 28.559 9.916 .001
Error 34.562 12 2.880
Total 47622.440 16
 Corrected Total 120.237 15

a. R Squared = .713 (Adjusted R Squared = .641)

Analisis data
Hipotesis Statistik
𝐻0 : 𝜇𝐴 = 𝜇𝐵 = 𝜇𝐶 = 𝜇𝐷
𝐻1 : Bukan 𝐻0
Hipotesis Penelitian

H0 : Terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan dari catalyst terhadap concentration of one component in
a three- component liquid.
H1 : Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dari catalyst terhadap concentration of one component in a
three- component liquid.
Hasil statistik :
Nilai F0 = 9, 9169 dan sig. = 0,001 dikatakan signifikan apabila nilai Sig. < 0,05
Dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dari catalyst terhadap
concentration of one component in a three- component liquid.
 BAB 4 latihan hal 52

4.13 An industrial engineer is conducting an experiment on eye focus time. He is interested in the
effect of the distance of the object from the eye on the focus time. Four different distances
are of interest. He has five subjects available for the experiment. Because there may be
difference among individuals, he decides to conduct the experiment in a randomized block
design. The data obtained follow, analyze the data from this experiment (use 𝛼 = 0,05)
and draw appropriate conclusions.
Distance (Ft) subject
1 2 3 4 5
4 10 6 6 6 6
6 7 6 6 1 6
8 5 3 3 2 5
10 6 4 4 2 3
Jawab
Input SPSS :

No A B Y
1. 4 1 10
2. 4 2 6
3. 4 3 6
4. 4 4 6
5. 4 5 6
6. 6 1 7 A : Distance
7. 6 2 6
B : Subject
8. 6 3 6
9. 6 4 1 Y : Eye Focus Time
10. 6 5 6
11. : 8 1 5
12. 8 2 3
13. 8 3 3
14. 8 4 2
15. 8 5 5
16. 10 1 6
17. 10 2 4
18. 10 3 4
19. 10 4 2
20. 10 5 3
Output SPSS :
Univariate Analysis of Variance

Between-Subjects Factors
N

4 5

6 5
Distance
8 5

10 5
1 4

2 4

Subject 3 4

4 4

5 4

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Eye Focus Time

Source Type III Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.

Squares

Corrected Model 69.250a 7 9.893 7.759 .001

Intercept 470.450 1 470.450 368.980 .000
A 32.950 3 10.983 8.614 .003
B 36.300 4 9.075 7.118 .004
Error 15.300 12 1.275
Total 555.000 20
Corrected Total 84.550 19

a. R Squared = .819 (Adjusted R Squared = .713)

Analisis Data
Hipotesis Statistik
Pertama
𝐻0 : 𝜇01 = 𝜇02
𝐻1 : 𝜇01 ≠ 𝜇02
Kriteria Pengujian Hipotesis
Tolak 𝐻0 dan terima 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. < 0.05
Tolak 𝐻0 dan tolak 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. > 0.05
Kedua
𝐻0 : 𝜇10 = 𝜇20
𝐻1 : 𝜇10 ≠ 𝜇20
Kriteria Pengujian Hipotesis
Tolak 𝐻0 dan terima 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. < 0.05
Tolak 𝐻0 dan tolak 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. > 0.05
Hipotesis Penelitian
Pertama
𝐻0 : terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan distance terhadap eye focus time
𝐻1 : terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan distance terhadap eye focus time
Kedua
𝐻0 : terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Subject terhadap eye focus time
𝐻1 : terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Subject terhadap eye focus time
Hasil Statistik
1. Nilai 𝐹0 = 8.614 dan sig. = 0.003. dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa
terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan distance terhadap eye focus time
2. Nilai 𝐹0 = 7.118 dan sig. = 0.004. dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa
terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan subject terhadap eye focus time.

4.23 Suppose that in Problem 4-15 the engineer suspect that the workplace used by the four
operators may represent an additional source of variation . a fourth factor, workplace
(𝛼, 𝛽, 𝛾, 𝛿) may be introduced and another experiment conducted, yielding the Graeco-
Latin square that follower. Analyze the data from this experiment (use 𝛼 = 0.05) and drew
conclusions
Order of Operator
Asembly 1 2 3 4
1 𝐶𝛽 =11 𝐵𝛾 = 10 𝐷𝛿 = 14 𝐴𝛼 = 8
2 𝐵𝛼 = 8 𝐶𝛽 = 12 𝐴𝛾 = 10 𝐷𝛽 = 12
3 𝐴𝛿 = 9 𝐷𝛼 = 11 𝐵𝛽 = 7 𝐶𝛾 = 15
4 𝐷𝛾 = 9 𝐴𝛽 = 8 𝐶𝛼 = 18 𝐵𝛽 = 6

Jawab:
A : Order of Assembly
B : Operator
C : Latin Square
D : Graeco
Y : Workplaces used
Input SPSS:
No A B C D Y
1. 1 1 3 2 11
2. 1 2 2 3 10
3. 1 3 4 4 14
4. 1 4 1 1 8
5. 2 1 2 1 8
6. 2 2 3 4 12
7. 2 3 1 3 10
8. 2 4 4 2 12
9. 3 1 1 4 9
10. 3 2 4 1 11
11. 3 3 2 2 7
12. 3 4 3 3 15
13. 4 1 4 3 9
14. 4 2 1 2 8
15. 4 3 3 1 18
16. 4 4 2 4 6

Output SPSS :
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N

1 4

2 4
Order of Assembly
3 4

4 4
1 4
2 4
Operator
3 4
4 4
1 A 4
2 B 4
Latin Square
3 C 4
4 D 4
1 4

2 4
Graeco
3 4

4 4
 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: Workplace used

Source Type III Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.

Squares

Corrected Model 122.500a 12 10.208 1.114 .529

Intercept 1764.000 1 1764.000 192.436 .001
A .500 3 .167 .018 .996
B 19.000 3 6.333 .691 .616
C 95.500 3 31.833 3.473 .167
D 7.500 3 2.500 .273 .843
Error 27.500 3 9.167
Total 1914.000 16
Corrected Total 150.000 15

a. R Squared = .817 (Adjusted R Squared = .083)

Analisis Data
Hipotesis Statistik
Pertama
𝐻0 : 𝜇01 = 𝜇02
𝐻0 : 𝜇01 ≠ 𝜇02
Kriteria Pengujian Hipotesis
Tolak 𝐻0 dan terima 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. < 0.05
Tolak 𝐻0 dan tolak 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. > 0.05
Kedua
𝐻0 : 𝜇10 = 𝜇20
𝐻1 : 𝜇10 ≠ 𝜇20
Kriteria Pengujian Hipotesis
Tolak 𝐻0 dan terima 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. < 0.05
Tolak 𝐻0 dan tolak 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. > 0.05
Ketiga
𝐻0 : 𝜇20 = 𝜇30
𝐻1 : 𝜇20 ≠ 𝜇30
Kriteria Pengujian Hipotesis
Tolak 𝐻0 dan terima 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. < 0.05
Tolak 𝐻0 dan tolak 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. > 0.05
Keempat
𝐻0 : 𝜇30 = 𝜇40
𝐻1 : 𝜇30 ≠ 𝜇40
Kriteria Pengujian Hipotesis
Tolak 𝐻0 dan terima 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. < 0.05
Tolak 𝐻0 dan tolak 𝐻1 : jika nilai sig. > 0.05
Hipotesis Penelitian
Pertama
𝐻0 : terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Order of Assembly terhadap Workplace used
𝐻1 : terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Order of Assembly terhadap Workplace used
Kedua
𝐻0 : terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Operator terhadap Workplace used
𝐻1 : terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Operator terhadap Workplace used
Ketiga
𝐻0 : terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Latin Square terhadap workplace used
𝐻1 : terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Latin Square terhadap workplaced used
Keempat
𝐻0 : terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Graeco terhadap workplaced used
𝐻1 : terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan Graeco terhadap workplaced used

Hasil Statistik
1. Nilai 𝐹0 = 0.018 dan sig. = 0.996. dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa
terdapat pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Order of Assembly terhadap Workplace used
2. Nilai 𝐹0 = 0.691 dan sig. = 0.616 dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat
pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Operator terhadap Workplace used
3. Nilai 𝐹0 = 3 473 dan sig. = 0.167 dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat
pengaruh yang tidak signifikan Latin Square terhadap workplace used
4. Nilai 𝐹0 = 0. 273dan sig. = 0.843 dari hasil data di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat
pengaruh yang yang tidak signifikan Graeco terhadap workplaced used