Professional Documents
Culture Documents
‘Garden City’
Strong community
Ordered development
Environmental quality
These were to be achieved by:
Unified ownwership of land to prevent individual land
Speculation and maximize community benefit
Careful planning to provide generous living and
Working Space while maintaining natural qualities
Social Mix and good community facilities
Limits to growth of each garden city
Local participation in decisions about development
-a New York planner. Perry’s neighborhood unit concept began as a means of insulating the
community from the ill-effects of burgeoning sea of vehicular traffic.
Evolved due to the advent of industrial revolution and degradation of the city environment
caused due to:
High congestion
Heavy traffic movement through the city
Insecurity to school going children
Distant location of shopping and recreation activities; etc.
NEIGHBORHOOD UNIT
Children will have no traffic streets to cross on their way to school, schools which are within
walking distance from home;
An environment in which women may have an easy walk to a shopping centre where they may
get the daily household goods.
Employed people may find convenient transportation to and from work
Well equipped playground is located near the house where children may play in safety with their
friends for healthy development of their mind and spirit.
Compact in Size
Mix of Uses
Network of Streets
Public Open Space
Building Typologies
Parking Strategies
Transit Opportunities
Compatibility
3. SATTELITE TOWNS
A Satellite town or satellite city is a concept in urban planning that refers essentially to smaller
metropolitan areas which are located somewhat near to, but are mostly independent of larger
metropolitan areas.
Characteristics:
The City Beautiful Movement was a reform philosophy of North American architecture and
urban planning that flourished during the 1890s and 1900s with the intent of introducing
beautification and monumental grandeur in cities.
The movement, which was originally associated mainly with Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, and
Washington, D.C., promoted beauty not only for its own sake, but also to create moral and civic
virtue among urban populations.
Advocates of the philosophy believed that such beautification could promote a harmonious
social order that would increase the quality of life, while critics would complain that the
movement was overly concerned with aesthetics at the expense of social reform.
Burnham believed that a city needed a grand entrance and that was the railway depot.
The grand boulevard was justified as a solution to traffic problems encountered by suburban commuters
and a way to provide housing for higher people in the city.
Burnham also wanted all the bridges over the rivers rebuilt to be more attractive.
City Beautiful Movement superimposed a system of diagonals and rotundas over the basic rectangular
grid street patterns of American cities
City Beautiful" planning concentrated on public buildings as focal points of wide and grandiose avenues
Patrick Geddes:
Gave new approach to the development of existing towns and new techniques of
planning.
A town is integration of ‘folk, work and place’
This means that in preparing a plan we must take into consideration:
-The no. and the kind of people
-Their needs for work
-And place (housing, education recreation and amenities)
All data must be analysed and then developed.
His technique of planning were
a) Survey before plan
b) Plan Before Development
c) Observe to understand and understand to foresee.
Rural development, Urban Planning and City Design are not the same and
adopting a common planning process is disastrous.
Conurbation- Waves of population inflow to large cities, followed by
overcrowding and slum formation, and then the wave of backflow- the wholw
process resulting in amorphous sprawl, waste, and unnecessary obsolescence.
6. RADBURN THEORY
Radburn was going to meet the problems of "modern society" is best illustrated in
architect Henry Wright's "Six Planks for a Housing Platform". These ideas formed the
basic philosophy that he followed in designing Radburn. His planks were:
1. Plan simply, but comprehensively. Don't stop at the individual property line. Adjust
paving, sidewalks, sewers and the like to the particular needs of the property dealt with -
not to a conventional pattern. Arrange buildings and grounds so as to give sunlight, air and a
tolerable outlook to even the smallest and cheapest house.
2. Provide ample sites in the right places for community use: i.e., playgrounds, school
gardens, schools, theatres, churches, public buildings and stores.
3. Put factories and other industrial buildings where they can be used without wasteful
transportation of goods or people.
4. Cars must be parked and stored, deliveries made, waste collected - plan for such services
with a minimum of danger, noise and confusion.
5. Bring private and public land into relationship and plan buildings and groups of buildings
with relation to each other. Develop collectively such services as will add to the comfort of
the individual, at lower cost than is possible under individual operation.
6. Arrange for the occupancy of houses on a fair basis of cost and service, including the
cost of what needs to be done in organizing, building and maintaining the community.