Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Suggested time
Based on the RYA syllabus we suggest you allow about 4 hours plus additional time for the RYA
exercises.
Sight Reduction
Once we have LHA and Declination for the body we can obtain the intercept and azimuth in the
normal way.
Considerations
There are some peculiarities with this sight which relate to the fact that the moon is bright, nearby
and has somewhat irregular habits!
Brightness
• We need to be careful with a very bright moon - it can cause us to perceive a false horizon at
night and thus create a potentially huge error.
• The brightness can also allow a moon sight to be crossed with a sun sight to give us a good fix if
the angle of cut is acceptable
Irregular habits
Orbit time
The moon orbits the earth in a period of around 23h 10 minutes. This means that the LMT is NOT
the same on all meridians and we need to correct for this if we plan to use the moon for a Meridian
Passage sight.
It is a simple process and to find UT Mer. Pass for the moon:
1. Extract Moon Mer. Pass - usually the UPPER value is used - the LOWER one is only
applicable to high latitudes and can generally be ignored.
1.1. Take the difference between LMTs.
• E longitude - compare with the previous day.
• W longitude - compare with the next day.
2. Multiply by your longitude to the nearest quarter degree or so, divide the result by 360 and
round to the nearest minute in time. This gives the corrected LMT Mer. Pass for your
longitude.
Here’s an example.
If our longitude were 090°W and we want to find UT Mer. Pass on September 22nd we would work
as follows:
• Mer. Pass Moon on 22 September is 22h 34m and for 23 September it is 23h 29m.
• The difference is 55 minutes and this means that as the moon orbits the earth its LMT Mer. Pass
is changing over the 23 hours by that amount. We can guess that ¼ way round the earth at
Longitude 090°W it will be ¼ of the way through its time change or 13m 45s. so LMT Mer. Pass
will be 22h 48m for planning purposes.
• Applying the formula gives the same result; i.e. 55 x (90 /360) = 13m 45s.
• Now correct as usual to get UT Mer. Pass. for the moon by applying the normal longitude in time
correction.
The declination changes quite fast so the time of Mer. Pass and, indeed, the Sextant Altitude may be
difficult to observe precisely.
Moon sights
The problem is that the moon is relatively close to the earth (1/4 million miles or so) and the distance
varies. The correction factors are therefore slightly more complex. You corrected the AA to TA in a
Lecture 1.
Taking the sight
It’s an easy and big object which can be easily sighted:
• Take the upper or lower limb as with the sun.
• The difference is that the decision will depend on which limb is fully visible, unless the moon is
full. At quarter moon one limb or the other will be visible.
The only real constraints are at the time of new moon, when it cannot be seen at all, and during
periods of cloud cover.
Corrections for the moon
?? If you cannot remember how to correct from AA to TA for the moon then now is the time to
revisit Lecture 1.
The sight reduction process is similar to that for the sun and planets. Here are the main differences:
• The rapid movement of the moon means that we can no longer use a single figure for ‘v’ and ‘d’
over a 3 day period (as in the planets).
• Instead they are tabulated for each hour.
• The ‘v’ (GHA) and ‘d’ corrections (Declination) are tabulated hourly (see RYA page 17)
plus the HP value.
1. Extract all three into the sight form.
2. Follow the rules on page 24 of the RYA booklet for calculation of the TA.
3. Use the applicable ‘v’ and ‘d’ to calculate the moon’s GHA and Declination.
4. Proceed as usual to obtain intercept and azimuth.
If this has totally confused you then don’t worry! There’s a worked example overleaf.
?? Try an example:
Sight data
• Evening twilight on 21 September 1980. EP 49° 49’S, 16° 35’W
• Sight of moon’s lower limb gave an S A of 27° 34’.6 at UT 18h 35m 16s
• IE 2’.8 ON the arc and height of eye 3.2m
What were the chosen position, intercept and azimuth?
Chapter 4 - Polaris
You probably know that the ‘Pole Star’ is a star which is ‘in the North’. In other words it is always
visible at night in N Latitudes and is called a ‘circumpolar’ star. Being circumpolar, we perceive it as
‘rotating’ in a full circle every 24 hours with a diameter of about 1.5°. So, incidentally, do all the
stars but, of course, they spend a lot of their time below our visible horizon. Strictly speaking a
circumpolar body is ‘a heavenly body which is above the (observers) horizon at its lower meridian
passage (i.e. its polar distance is less than the observer’s latitude)’.
?? Chapter 10 of Ocean Sailing also covers the reduction of a Polaris sight. Look at it now.
Latitude by Polaris
A Polaris sight, once reduced to its True Altitude, actually gives a latitude to within about two
degrees without further calculation. As always we can obtain a much more accurate result by some
simple arithmetic. Here’s the background:
• If Polaris were exactly over the N Pole then its True Altitude would equal the latitude.
• It isn’t, though it is close, and we have to apply some corrections.
• They are to be found in the Nautical Almanac (page 18 in our books).
the sun’s Mer. Pass). Polaris is above the north pole rather than the equator and, hence, TA =
ZD = Latitude.
?? There’s a worked example at the bottom of RYA page 18 to help you see how the process
works so study it now.
IN FACT there is still a small error. Look at the Azimuth table at the bottom of RYA page 18.
Here’s the problem. We assume that a parallel of latitude is at 90° to True North – South. That holds
true for all sights except Polaris. Depending on the LHA and Latitude the actual azimuth of Polaris
can be up to 2 degrees off True North.
Technically, therefore, the Polaris position line will have a bearing that differs from the parallel of
latitude. In practice, this introduces a negligible error that can be ignored.
And now you can work on and submit RYA Exercise 11.
Quick revision
• Remember your variation and deviation - you may recall C D M V T and CADET.
• Alternatively, try 'TRAWMA'; i.e. TrueAddWestMAgnetic.
Technique
We are going to measure the bearing of the sun just as it rises or sets and then compare it with,
you’ve guessed it, a tabulated value. Allow for variation (from the chart) and the difference is the
deviation on that heading. Sounds simple and it really is. You can try it anytime the sun is visible at,
or very close to, the horizon.
Now what?
We know:
• The compass bearing of the sun.
• The true azimuth.
• The variation.
One simple way to calculate the deviation is as follows:
• True Azimuth plus/minus variation = magnetic bearing.
• Magnetic bearing plus/minus deviation = compass bearing.
• The difference between the magnetic and compass bearings is what we are trying to
determine - the DEVIATION ON THAT HEADING (i.e. as we steer towards the sun, if that
was the course we chose, or the actual ship’s head if we measured the sun’s angle relative to
the ship’s head with a pelorus or similar device).
Try one
The bearing of the sun at sunrise was 081°C. Declination was 11°N and our EP was 50°N 12°W
Variation 4°W. What is the compass deviation, what would the GPS ground track have been showing
if there was no appreciable leeway or ocean current and the vessel was aimed at the sun as it rose?
• From the table the sun’s bearing = 72.7°N and E.
• True Azimuth = 000° + 72.7 = 73° (rounded).
• Magnetic azimuth = 077°.
• Compass azimuth = 081° C.
• Deviation therefore = 4°W.
• GPS COG would have been 0730 T
If we can measure the sun’s actual bearing and, at the same time, use the sextant to take a sight of it
then we can carry out a compass check at any time. Actually the sun’s altitude (or any other body
come to that) must be sufficiently small that the errors in measuring its azimuth by the ship’s
compass are within a degree. This is real world stuff and we can accept some significant errors (in
astro navigation terms) without affecting the answer.
Armed with the MEASURED bearing of the sun, a rough knowledge of our position, and the sextant
altitude of the sun at a known time and date we can work out the deviation of the steering compass.
Sounds unlikely? Here’s how to do it.
1. Work out the true azimuth of the body - Zn.
• Calculate LHA and declination for body.
• Enter table and look up Z - we can discard the rest of the sight information - and work
out Zn.
2. Proceed as before to calculate the deviation.
?? There is no more new astro to learn. You should now study the lectures on World Weather
and Passage Planning.
Chapter 6 - Answers
1
The words ‘ground track’ say it all. This is the vessel’s actual progress over the ground and, by definition, it includes both
the compass error and the effect of any ocean currents (covered in a later lecture), not to mention the steering errors
caused by the helmsmen and an autopilot if one is fitted. This technique will lead to very accurate navigation but cannot
solve our need - to establish the accuracy of the steering compass.
2
FP Aries 209° 10’.7
Inc 28m 30s 7° 08’.7
GHA Aries 216° 19’.4
Long 17° 19’.4 W
LHA Aries 199°. We’ve corrected to a whole no. LHA but it is not, strictly, necessary.
3
Sex Alt 30° 45’.7
IE - 2’.4
Dip - 2’.8
App Alt 30° 40’.5
Alt Corr - 1’.6
True Alt 30° 38’.9
4
From tables:
a0 1° 46’.8
a1 0’.6
a2 1’.0
Total corr’n 1° 48’.4
Subtract 1°
Correction + 0° 48’.4
Latitude 31° 27’.3
5
We know this one - or at least we should by now! Zn is the true azimuth of the observed body at the time and date of the
observation. Sounds rather like the true bearing of the sun doesn’t it?