1

Mohd Adil Ali

Eng 0402

Dr. Raj Kumar

19 April 2019

Kristeva's Cyclical and Monumental Time

In the essay "Women's Time" written in 1979 by Kristeva. She contends that female subjectivity

is separated between cyclical(repetition, development, the natural clock) and monumental time

(everlasting) fantasies of revival, the religion of maternity). These modalities are set off against

the season of direct history (characterised by venture, teleology, movement, Bildung) and its re-

gional correlatives (national spatial imaginaries, supranational social and religious memory).

Cyclic time represents the biological difference of woman to man which is understand, inter-

preted or read in specific ways. The cycles, the biological rhythm of woman which conforms to

that of nature has often been interpreted as a `natural difference' to the norm of man.

Where as Monumental time (eternity) produces a sign or symbol with an inherited history (my-

thology, religious beliefs, scientific discourses). So for example, the sign of `woman' in monu-

mental time refers to the biblical representations of woman, `woman' as inferior to `man' in Dar-

win's theory of survival of the fittest, `black woman's' sexual deviancy as incorporated in the the-

ories of nineteenth century medicine and science.

Accordingly, the present of Women's time (Monumental and cyclical) might be a zone of illustra-

tive shortcoming. That is, the depiction of ladies' in and through the sign 'woman' transforms into

the area of constant challenge and recreation. In this time, `woman' does not signify the female

body as a derivable historical presence, a discursive object; but a discursive subject constructed in

the performance of the narrative..

The underlying women's activists, amid the Suffragette movement and after, needed to partake in

the linear time and space of project and history, and requested equivalent rights there, rejected
 2

numerous feminine attributes. They needed to neglect any sexual contrast totally, their cyclic

time, all female traits, even maternity, and interface totally with that linear time. This movement

was universalist but then attached to specific socio-political substances. It was an endeavour to

associate with 'the intelligent and ontological estimations of an objectivity overwhelming in the

country state. Notwithstanding, this current is universalist and globalises the issues of women’s

of various locales and nationalities and. social class . Along these lines, it isn't intersectional, and

uncovers a racial and a class bias.

In this manner, the present of women’s time can't be abide upon. As such, the outline of women’s

by the sign 'women' can turn into an area of challenge and modification.

Kristeva trusts that the subject is dependably in steady condition of transition among symbolic

and semiotic, along these lines evoking a nervousness attributable to the absence of a fixed char-

acter. She anticipated that women’s should write in linear time that would reflect monumental

time, while additionally grasping the cyclic time.