Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER
AGRICULTURE EXTENSIONS
SUMMARY SHEET
For NABARD Grade A/B 2019
Introduction
• The word ‘Extension’ is derived from the Latin roots, ‘tensio’ meaning stretching and 'ex'
meaning out.
• Extension education means that type of education which is stretched out into the villages
and fields beyond the limits of the schools and colleges to which the formal type of
education is normally confined.
• Extension education is a science which deals with the creation, transmission and application
of knowledge designed to bring about planned changes in the behavior complex of people;
with a view to help them to live better by learning the ways of improving their vocations,
enterprises and institutions.
• Various scientists have defined the term “Extension” according to their interest, experience
and training.
• Extension education is used in various fields, such as Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy,
Veterinary, Health, Home Science, Industry, Cooperative and Forestry.
The different concepts of Extension may be studied as:
• Extension service: An organization and or a programme for agricultural development and rural
welfare which employs the extension process as a means of programme implementation.
• Extension process: The extension process is that of working with rural people through out of
school education, along those lines of their current interests and needs which are closely
Agriculture extension
Agriculture extension can be viewed as an educational programme to be undertaken by public
agencies to activate the process of transferring knowledge, science and technology from
laboratories to people or farmer and to help them in farm planning, decision making, record
keeping, use of inputs, storage, processing and marketing, ensure supplies and services, increase
their production, develop people and their leaders, improve their occupation, family, and
community life.
Late 1970s:
• In the late-1970s, the agricultural extension system became mostly involved in the
distribution of agricultural inputs through the state agricultural depots and handling of the
subsidies that were provided through various agricultural development programs.
• The public-sector extension system as a whole seemed to have become a monolithic
organization without specific goals to achieve.
• Sustaining such a large system without added benefits to agricultural productivity became a
big challenge for agriculture ministries at both the central and state levels.
• Therefore, reforming of the system towards goal orientation and better operational
efficiency was sought.
In the 1990s:
• Agricultural extension witnessed a qualitative change in the 1990s, with a new focus on
privatisation and the withdrawal of support to the state-led extension system.
• Reduced spending by government weakened the public-sector extension system. Other non-
governmental agencies stepped in to fill the vacuum.
• The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) is an autonomous organisation under the
Department of Agricultural Research and Education (DARE), Ministry of Agriculture,
Government of India.
• Formerly known as Imperial Council of Agricultural Research, it was established on 16 July
1929 as a registered society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 in pursuance of the
report of the Royal Commission on Agriculture.
• The ICAR has its headquarters at New Delhi.
• The Council is the apex body for co-ordinating, guiding and managing research and education
in agriculture including horticulture, fisheries and animal sciences in the entire country.
Contribution of ICAR
The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) had added a new dimension to agricultural
research in India by launching in 1979 the National Agricultural Research Project (NARP) with World
Bank assistance to strengthen the research capabilities of the State Agricultural Universities (SAUs)
to conduct need-based, location-specific and production-oriented research as an important means
of finding solutions to the location specific problems in different agro-climatic zones in their
respective service areas.
• To harness the potential of ICT in agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture took the initiative of
launching an innovative scheme “Kisan Call Centers” on 21st January, 2004 aimed at offering
solutions to farmers’ queries on a telephone call and to leverage the extensive
telecommunication infrastructure in the country to deliver extension services to the
farming community.
• These Kisan Call Centres (KCCs) are presently operating in 25 locations covering all the States
& UTs with 144 Call Center Agents engaged therein answering farmers’ queries in their
language.
• Training and capacity building of extension functionaries was always given a priority status
in the national extension system.
• Establishment of Extension Education Institutes (EEIs) is aimed at imparting higher training
in extension education.
• EEIs were specifically established to meet the training requirement in the field of
Communication Technology, Extension Methodology, Training Management, Participatory
Rural Appraisal (PRA), Management of Agricultural Information System, etc. extension
functionaries of State Development Departments on a continuing basis.
Four Extension Education Institutes (EEIs) have been established on regional basis as detailed
below:
It includes: (i) programme planning process; (ii) written programme statement; (iii) plan of work; (iv)
programme execution; (v) results; and (vi) evaluation.
An "extension programme" is arrived at co-operatively by the local people and the extension staff
and includes a statement of:
The evaluation of agricultural extension programs implies the systematic collection of information
about the activities, characteristics, and outcomes of a program to make judgments about the
program, improve its effectiveness, and/or inform decisions about future programming.
• Process evaluation focuses on the process of a program rather than the outcome and is
generally carried out during the implementation of a program.
• It involves the collection of information about program activities and about the delivery of
a program.
• Process evaluation is generally formative in nature, but can also be summative, for example
when the stakeholders need to know about the actual delivery of a program for justification
of program spending.
• Outcome evaluation is carried out towards the end of a program’s life and is aimed at
assessing the program to establish whether the desired outcomes have been reached.
Outcome evaluation is generally summative but may be formative when the findings are
used to improve future or other existing programs.
• Goal (or objective) based evaluations are carried out to judge whether the stated goals or
objectives of a program have been achieved.
• In this approach goals are taken as given and decisions about the success of a program are
based on the extent to which the goals are reached.
• In needs-based evaluation the evaluator does not concentrate solely on the stated
objectives of a program but also evaluates the impact of the program with regard to the
needs of the stakeholder group and the needs of society in general.
• Quantitative data analysis in evaluation usually refers to approaches involving heavy use of
numerical measurement and data analysis methods, from social science or from accounting
(e.g. cost–benefit analysis).
• Quantitative research emphasizes standardization, precision, objectivity and reliability of
measurement. Quantitative research is characterized by generating data that can be
analyzed statistically.
• Qualitative data analysis in evaluation refers to the part of evaluation that cannot be
usefully reduced to quantitative measures.
• A large part of contemporary evaluation is qualitative, meaning that description and
interpretation make up most of it.
• The use of qualitative methods can provide evaluators with rich, first-hand information on
questions such as how a program is implemented, the patterns of interaction between
stakeholders, the kind of day-to-day problems that are confronted by program staff, and so
on. It also tends to focus on social processes rather than outcomes.
Vision: Lead India to attaining sustainable food, nutritional, environmental and livelihoods
security through agricultural research and education.
Mission: Harness the power of science and innovation for food security, food safety, farmer
prosperity and enhance natural resources base to promote inclusive g r o w t h and sustainable
development.
Farmers FIRST:
• The objectives of the 'Farmer FIRST' initiative is to move beyond the production and
productivity and to privilege the complex, diverse & risk prone realities of the farmers
through enhancing farmers-scientists contact with multi-stakeholders participation for
technology development and application.
• The project has been conceptualized with focus on Enriching Farmers –Scientist interface;
Technology Assemblage, Application and feedback; Partnership and Institutional Building and
Content Mobilization.
ARYA:
• The ICAR has initiated a program on “Attracting and Retaining Youth in Agriculture (ARYA)”
in selected districts through KVKs with an objective for entrepreneurial development of
Youth in Rural Areas to take up various Agriculture, allied and service sector enterprises for
sustainable income and gainful employment.
• The identified youth are trained on entrepreneurship development skills by providing a
basket of options to start agriculture ventures for self employment.
• An innovative initiative “Mera Gaon Mera Gaurav” has been planned to promote the direct
interface of scientists with the farmers to hasten the lab to land process.
• The objective of this scheme is to provide farmers with required information, knowledge
and advisories on regular basis by adopting villages.
• Under this scheme, scientists will select villages as per their convenience and will remain in
touch with the selected villages and provide information to the farmers on technical and
other related aspects in a time frame through personal visits or on telephone.
• Being a resource person for the village, the scientists are also expected to monitor the
process of adoption of agricultural technologies by the farmers.
• The scientists may make use of community radio, local newspapers, mobile messages,
video, exhibition and local media and make initiatives to have dialogue with the farmers in
their local language.
To modernize and further improve our extension systems the following roadmap needs to be
followed:
• Assess the existing extension organization against farmer’s needs and determine whether to
strengthen or restructure it.
• Decentralize extension but not before capacity-building of the staff and orientation of relevant
elected officials.
• Broaden the technical mandate of extension to aim at broader development of rural human
resources.
• Formulate national policy on extension in order to ensure political and financial commitment.
• Promote pluralism in extension by involving public, private and civil society institutions.
• Privatize extension partially or fully where it is socially and economically feasible.
• Develop and apply information technology tools to facilitate the work of extension workers.
• Develop original, location-specific, participatory, gender-sensitive and inexpensive extension
methodologies and materials instead of applying those methodologies which are promoted as
universally suitable.
• Encourage the extension services to empower farmers through organizing them into legal
associations to constitute a strong lobby for themselves and for extension.